Time course of purine protection against kainate-induced increase in hippocampal [3H]-PK11195 binding

Adenosine receptors and neurological disease: neuroprotection and neurodegeneration

Adenosine receptors modulate neuronal and synaptic function in a range of ways that may make them relevant to the occurrence, development and treatment of brain ischemic damage and degenerative disorders. A(1) adenosine receptors tend to suppress neural activity by a predominantly presynaptic action, while A(2A) adenosine receptors are more likely to promote transmitter release and postsynaptic depolarization. A variety of interactions have also been described in which adenosine A(1) or A(2) adenosine receptors can modify cellular responses to conventional neurotransmitters or receptor agonists such as glutamate, NMDA, nitric oxide and P2 purine receptors. Part of the role of adenosine receptors seems to be in the regulation of inflammatory processes that often occur in the aftermath of a major insult or disease process. All of the adenosine receptors can modulate the release of cytokines such as interleukins and tumor necrosis factor-alpha from immune-competent leukocytes and glia. When examined directly as modifiers of brain damage, A(1) adenosine receptor (AR) agonists, A(2A)AR agonists and antagonists, as well as A(3)AR antagonists, can protect against a range of insults, both in vitro and in vivo. Intriguingly, acute and chronic treatments with these ligands can often produce diametrically opposite effects on damage outcome, probably resulting from adaptational changes in receptor number or properties. In some cases molecular approaches have identified the involvement of ERK and GSK-3beta pathways in the protection from damage. Much evidence argues for a role of adenosine receptors in neurological disease. Receptor densities are altered in patients with Alzheimer's disease, while many studies have demonstrated effects of adenosine and its antagonists on synaptic plasticity in vitro, or on learning adequacy in vivo. The combined effects of adenosine on neuronal viability and inflammatory processes have also led to considerations of their roles in Lesch-Nyhan syndrome, Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease, Huntington's disease and multiple sclerosis, as well as the brain damage associated with stroke. In addition to the potential pathological relevance of adenosine receptors, there are earnest attempts in progress to generate ligands that will target adenosine receptors as therapeutic agents to treat some of these disorders.

Nutritional iron deprivation attenuates kainate-induced neurotoxicity in rats: implications for involvement of iron in neurodegeneration

There is evidence suggesting that oxidative stress contributes to kainate neurotoxicity. Since iron promotes oxidative stress, the present study explores how change in nutritional iron content modulates kainate-induced neurotoxicity. Rats received an iron-deficient diet (ID) from 22 days of age for 4 weeks. One control group received the same diet supplemented with iron and another control group received standard rodent diet. Cellular damage after subcutaneous kainate (10 mg/kg) was assessed by silver impregnation and gliosis by staining microglia. ID reduced cellular damage in piriform and entorhinal cortex, in thalamus, and in hippocampal layers CA1-3. ID also attenuated gliosis, except in the hippocampal CA1 layer. Given involvement of zinc in hippocampal neurotransmission and in oxidative stress, we tested for a possible interaction of nutritional iron with nutritional zinc. Rats were made iron-deficient and then assigned to supplementation with iron, zinc, or iron + zinc. Controls were continued on ID diet. After 2 weeks, rats were treated with kainate. Iron supplementation abolished the protective effect of ID in piriform and entorhinal cortex. In hippocampal CA1 and dorsal thalamus, neither iron nor zinc supplementation alone abolished the protective effect of ID against cellular damage. Iron + zinc supplementation abolished ID protection in dorsal thalamus, but not in reuniens nucleus. Kainate-induced gliosis in CA1 remained unaffected by nutritional treatments. Thus, in piriform and entorhinal cortex, nutritional iron has a major impact on cellular damage and gliosis. In hippocampal CA1, gliosis may associate with synaptic plasticity not modulated by nutritional iron, while cellular damage is sensitive to nutritional iron and zinc.

Purines and neuroprotection

The activation of adenosine A1, A2 andA3 receptors can protect neurones against damage generated by mechanical or hypoxic/ischaemic insults as well as excitotoxins. A1 receptors are probably effective by suppressing transmitter release and producing neuronal hyperpolarisation. They are less likely to be of therapeutic importance due to the plethora of side effects resulting from A1 agonism, although the existence of receptor subtypes and recent synthetic chemistry efforts to increase ligand selectivity, may yet yield clinically viable compounds. Activation of A2A receptors can protect neurons, although there is much uncertainty as to whether agonists are acting centrally or via a peripheral mechanism such as altering blood flow or immune cell function. Selective antagonists at the A2A receptor, such as 4-(2-[7-amino-2-(2-furyl)(1,2,4)triazolo(2,3-a)(1,3,5)triazin-5-yl-amino]ethyl)phenol (ZM 241385) and 7-(2-phenylethyl)-5-amino-2-(2-furyl)-pyrazolo-[4,3e]-1,2,4-triazolo[1,5-c]pyrimidine (SCH 58261), can also protect against neuronal death produced by ischaemia or excitotoxicity. In addition, A2A receptor antagonists can reduce damage produced by combinations of subthreshold doses of the endogenous excitotoxin quinolinic acid and free radicals. Since the A2A receptors do not seem to be activated by normal endogenous levels of adenosine, their blockade should not generate significant side effects, so that A2A receptor antagonists appear to be promising candidates as new drugs for the prevention of neuronal damage. Adenosine A3 receptors have received less attention to date, but agonists are clearly able to afford protection against damage when administered chronically. Given the disappointing lack of success of NMDA receptor antagonists in human stroke patients, despite their early promise in animal models, it is possible that A2A receptor antagonists could have a far greater clinical utility.