Zhao YJ, Li XL, Lin L, Aou S, Oomura Y. Effects of acidic fibroblast growth factor fragments on nocturnal feeding in rats by intracerebroventricular and hypodermic injection.
Shijie Huaren Xiaohua Zazhi 2009;
17:259-264. [DOI:
10.11569/wcjd.v17.i3.259]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
AIM: To investigate the active region of aFGF responsible for food intake by calculating nocturnal food consumption to examine the efficacy of peripheral administration of the active fragments.
METHODS: For intracerebroventricular infusion, a guide cannula made of stainless steel tubing was fixed into the third cerebral ventricle one week before the experiments. Under no anesthesia seven synthesized aFGF fragments aFGF-(1-15), [D-Trp6]-aFGF-(1-15), [desaminoPhe1.D-Trp6]-aFGF-(1-15), [desaminoPhe1.Lys (ε-myristyl)16]-aFGF-(1-16), [Lys (ε-myristyl)16]-aFGF-(1-16), [D-Trp6.Lys (ε-myristyl)16]-aFGF-(1-16) and [Ala16] aFGF-(1-29) were injected into the third ventricle of rats during the period from 18:30 to 19:00. Powdered food in the animal food boxes were weighed at 19:00, 22:00, and 7:00 for calculating food consumption by rats in 3 hours and 12 hours. Then the two active aFGF fragments aFGF-(1-15) and [Ala16] aFGF-(1-29) were injected into the subcutaneous tissue of rats during the period from 18:30 to 19:00, to calculate nocturnal food consumption.
RESULTS: For intracerebroventricular infusion, aFGF-(1-15) (per rat 200 ng) had no effect on the feeding, while aFGF-(1-15) (per rat 400 ng) suppressed the food intake (3 h: 3.0 ± 0.2 vs 2.1 ± 0.2; 12 h: 18.5 ± 0.5 vs 16.1 ± 0.5, both P < 0.01). As for [Ala16] aFGF-(1-29), not only per rat 200 ng (3 h: 4.9 ± 0.2 vs 3.4 ± 0.2; 12 h: 19.3 ± 1.2 vs 17.3 ± 1.1, both P < 0.01) but also per rat 400 ng (3 h: 3.6 ± 0.1 vs 1.6 ± 0.2; 12 h: 19.9 ± 0.8 vs 16.4 ± 1.6, both P < 0.01) suppressed the food intake. Other five aFGF fragments had no effect on the feeding in the dose of per rat 200 ng and per rat 400 ng. For hypodermic injection, [Ala16] aFGF-(1-29) (300 mg/kg) suppressed the food intake (3 h: 3.9 ± 0.2 vs 2.1 ± 0.3; 12 h: 19.8 ± 0.5 vs 11.2 ± 0.8, both P < 0.01), while others had no effect.
CONCLUSION: These findings suggest the amino-terminal portion of aFGF is active in food intake suppression. The replacement of cysteine residue by alanine is important in some amino-terminal aFGF fragments. Other aFGF fragments, in which glycine at position 6 was replaced with D-tryptophane, phenylalanine at position 1 with desaminoPhe, and cysteine at position 16 with Lys (ε-myristyl) has no effect on nocturnal feeding in rats. Peripheral administration of one fragment is also effective on nocturnal feeding in rats.
Collapse