Evaluation of the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in the detection of cattle infected with Brucella abortus

Seroprevalence and risk factors of brucellosis in Arabian horses

Background

Brucellosis, as a zoonotic disease, mainly occurs in horses by Brucella abortus, Brucella canis and Brucella suis. The disease in equines is often asymptomatic, but the clinical signs in horses are mostly characterized by bursitis, arthritis and tenosynovitis.

Objectives

This study, thus, aimed to determine the seroprevalence of brucellosis and its associated risk factors in the Arabian horses of Khuzestan province, South‐west Iran.

Methods

To that end, the blood samples randomly collected from 180 Arabian horses were analyzed for the presence of anti‐Brucella antibodies by Rose Bengal plate test (RBPT), serum agglutination test (SAT), 2‐mercaptoethanol test (2‐ME) and a commercial i‐ELISA kit.

Results

The ROC curve analysis showed that the best cut‐off point for S/P values in i‐ELISA turned out to be 26.25%. The results showed that the overall seroprevalence of brucellosis based on parallel interpretation of the test results was 12.22% (Positive/Tested = 22/180). The prevalence of acute and chronic brucellosis was 8.3 and 3.9%, respectively. The seroprevalence of brucellosis with RBPT and i‐ELISA methods was 1.11% (2/180) and 7.22% (13/180), respectively. According to what SAT revealed, 9.44% (17/180) of sera had a titer of 40 or greater, and at 2‐ME, 7.22% of samples (13 out of 180 samples) depicted a titer of 40. The results of i‐ELISA, SAT and 2‐ME were significantly different from those of RBPT (p < 0.01); however, there was no significant difference between i‐ELISA, SAT and 2‐ME in findings (p > 0.05).

Conclusions

The results of this study recommend that i‐ELISA be used for screening purposes of brucellosis in horses. The findings confirmed that Arabian horses are natural hosts for the Brucellae. It is, thus, necessary to adopt appropriate prevention and control programs by health authorities and horse owners so as to reduce the distribution and transmission of the infection in the regions where brucellosis is prevalent.

Evaluation of the sensitivity and specificity of the lateral flow assay, Rose Bengal test and the complement fixation test for the diagnosis of brucellosis in cattle using Bayesian latent class analysis

This study was conducted to evaluate the sensitivity (Se) and specificity (Sp) of the Rose Bengal test (RBT), complement fixation test (CFT), the serum lateral flow assay (LFA_serum) and the blood lateral flow assay (LFA_blood) for the detection of antibodies to Brucella spp. using Bayesian latent class models (BLCMs). Sera and whole blood were collected from naturally infected cattle reared in smallholder, small-scale commercial and large-scale commercial farms in Zimbabwe (n = 1022) and Botswana (n = 770). The BLCMs were fitted under the assumption that conditional dependences existed between the tests. Based on the conditional dependence model, the RBT had the highest Se of 0.897 (95 % Probability Intervals: 0.854; 0.932) compared to 0.827 (0.773; 0.872), 0.812 (0.76; 0.858) and 0.809 (0.785; 0.832) for the LFA_serum, LFA_blood and CFT, respectively. The CFT recorded a higher Sp of 0.999 (0.995; 1.000) than the LFA_serum 0.996 (0.99; 1.000), the LFA_blood 0.984 (0.976; 0.991) and the RBT 0.969 (0.959; 0.978). The data indicated that both the Se and Sp of RBT and CFT and the Sp of LFA_serum and LFA_blood were conditionally independent, while the Se appeared to be conditionally dependent. These results indicated that none of the evaluated tests had perfect Se and Sp and consequently could not be used alone for the diagnosis of brucellosis in cattle from the studied farming sectors. Thus, based on high Se and Sp, respectively, a brucellosis testing regimen using the RBT (screening) and the LFA (confirmatory) may be considered.

Evaluation of three serological tests for diagnosis of bovine brucellosis in smallholder farms in Pakistan by estimating sensitivity and specificity using Bayesian latent class analysis

The present study aimed to estimate the herd-level sensitivity (Se) and specificity (Sp) of three commonly used serological tests in naturally-infected cattle and buffalo in smallholder farms in Pakistan. Between February and June 2015, a cross-sectional study was carried out in five districts of Punjab (Kasur, Okara, Pakpattan, Jhelum, and Bhakkar) and two districts of Sindh (Badin and Thatta). Serum samples from mixed farms of cattle (n=441) and buffalo (n=621) were collected and tested using the Rose Bengal test (RBT), indirect ELISA (I-ELISA) and competitive ELISA (C-ELISA). A Bayesian latent class analysis (LCA) approach was used to estimate the Se and Sp of these three serological tests and the true herd-level prevalence in each district. The model was fitted under the assumption of conditional independence between three tests and also conditional dependence by including covariances between the two ELISAs. In addition, the model was fitted using three different shapes of beta distributions to incorporate prior information in the model. The test with the highest Se was the C-ELISA, with a range from 76.3% (95% PCI (Posterior Credibility Interval), 62.6-88.2%) to 81.4% (95% PCI, 68.2-92.8%). The RBT was found to have the highest Sp (99.1-99.4%) of the tests. The highest estimated herd-level prevalence, 45% (95% PCI, 32-59%), was found in Jhelum district and the lowest in Thatta district, 1.1% (95% PCI 0.04-6.0%). The results of this study identified some discrepancy between the published literature on the level of Se of these tests, especially for RBT. It appears that RBT has lower Se and higher Sp when used in the field conditions of the present study. Consequently, it is recommended that none of the evaluated tests should be performed in isolation for the diagnosis of bovine brucellosis in the field conditions of Pakistan, but the use of tests in combination, with RBT and C-ELISA used in parallel returning optimal Se and Sp, is warranted.

Identification of Brucella spp. in feral swine (Sus scrofa) at abattoirs in Texas, USA

Various tissues, nasal swabs, urine and blood samples were collected from 376 feral swine at two federally inspected abattoirs in Texas during six separate sampling periods in 2015. Samples were tested for Brucella spp. by culture and serology. Brucella spp. were cultured from 13.0% of feral swine, and antibodies were detected in 9.8%. Only 32.7% of culture-positive feral swine were also antibody positive, and 43.2% of antibody-positive feral swine were culture positive. Approximately, the same number of males (14.0%) and females (12.1%) were culture positive, and slightly more males (10.5%) than females (8.7%) were antibody positive. Our results indicate that serology likely underestimates the prevalence of feral swine infected, and that those who come in contact with feral swine should be aware of the symptoms of infection with Brucella spp. to ensure prompt treatment.

Comparative Brucella abortus antibody prevalence in cattle under contrasting husbandry practices in Uganda

A study was conducted in the Luwero and Nakasongola districts in central Uganda to determine and compare the prevalence and distribution of antibodies against Brucella abortus in cattle under contrasting husbandry practices, using two serological tests. Three hundred and fifteen serum samples were systematically sampled from 29 farms and subsequently tested using the Rose Bengal plate test (RBPT) and Indirect Antibody Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay (I-ELISA). The overall prevalence of antibodies against Brucella abortus in the Nakasongola and Luwero districts was 2.4% and 4.7% on RBPT, compared with 1.2% and 3.34 % on I-ELISA. There was no significant difference between the results obtained by RBPT and indirect antibody ELISA (p 0.05). It was noted that antibodies against Brucella abortus were widely spread over different farms regardless of the cattle grazing system (p 0.05). Based on the findings, it is feasible to use RBPT as a cheaper screening alternative for brucellosis. A comprehensive national brucellosis study should be undertaken to study the epidemiology and prevalence of brucellosis in Uganda.

Diagnosis of brucellosis in livestock and wildlife

AIM

To describe and discuss the merits of various direct and indirect methods applied in vitro (mainly on blood or milk) or in vivo (allergic test) for the diagnosis of brucellosis in animals.

METHODS

The recent literature on brucellosis diagnostic tests was reviewed. These diagnostic tests are applied with different goals, such as national screening, confirmatory diagnosis, certification, and international trade. The validation of such diagnostic tests is still an issue, particularly in wildlife. The choice of the testing strategy depends on the prevailing brucellosis epidemiological situation and the goal of testing.

RESULTS

Measuring the kinetics of antibody production after Brucella spp. infection is essential for analyzing serological results correctly and may help to predict abortion. Indirect ELISAs help to discriminate 1) between false positive serological reactions and true brucellosis and 2) between vaccination and infection. Biotyping of Brucella spp. provides valuable epidemiological information that allows tracing an infection back to the sources in instances where several biotypes of a given Brucella species are circulating. Polymerase chain reaction and new molecular methods are likely to be used as routine typing and fingerprinting methods in the coming years.

CONCLUSION

The diagnosis of brucellosis in livestock and wildlife is complex and serological results need to be carefully analyzed. The B. abortus S19 and B. melitensis Rev. 1 vaccines are the cornerstones of control programs in cattle and small ruminants, respectively. There is no vaccine available for pigs or for wildlife. In the absence of a human brucellosis vaccine, prevention of human brucellosis depends on the control of the disease in animals.

ESTUDO COMPARATIVO ENTRE OS TESTES ADOTADOS PELO PNCEBT PARA O DIAGNÓSTICO SOROLÓGICO DA BRUCELOSE EM BOVINOS

RESUMO Avaliaram-se comparativamente as provas do antígeno acidificado tamponado (AAT), a combinação das provas de soroaglutinação lenta e 2-mercaptoetanol (2-ME) e a reação de fixação de complemento (RFC), provas preconizadas pelo Programa Nacional de Controle e Erradicação de Brucelose Tuberculose (PNCEBT). Para tanto, foram alisadas 1.061 amostras de soros bovinos. Os dados foram analisados pelo indicador kappa, adotando-se como ponto de corte o título 25 no 2-ME e 4 na RFC. Constatou-se sensibilidade relativa de 99,6%, 98,8% e 91,1%, respectivamente, para o AAT, a 2-ME e a RFC, e especificidade relativa de 83,9%, 96,2% e 100,0%. A comparação entre os testes adotados pelo programa apontou concordância boa entre o teste de triagem (AAT) e os testes confirmatórios (kappa: 2-ME = 0,80; e RFC = 0,73) e concordância ótima quando os testes confirmatórios foram comparados entre si (kappa = 0,86). No entanto foram encontrados soros com título elevado em um dos testes confirmatórios e resultado negativo no outro, o que reforça a ideia de que o diagnóstico sorológico da brucelose é mais confiável quando obtido por meio dos resultados de vários testes.

Incidence of brucellosis in Sri Lanka: an overview

Infection by Brucella abortus seems to be a major cause of abortions among cattle and buffaloes in Sri Lanka. The incidence of this disease is more prominent among the animals in the Dry zone of the country raised under extensive management systems. The present low incidence of this disease and the small size of the country may facilitate launching of an effective disease control scheme. The milk ring test (MRT) has proven to be usable in testing milk for the infection at farm level. An ELISA technique could be employed to test the seroprevalence of infection among MRT-positive animals. A program to purchase the diseased animals by the state for slaughter, and a countrywide vaccination program with B. abortus strain RB51 would enable the country's livestock industry to eventually eradicate this disease.

Seroepidemiology of Brucella abortus infection in bovids in Sri Lanka

From 1992 to 1995, 0.15% (n=3916) of the bovids (cattle and buffalo) in Sri Lanka were sampled, using a multi-stage sampling procedure. Serum antibodies for Brucella abortus were detected using the indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The age, the agroecological zone and the management system practiced in the farms of the sampled bovids were studied as risk factors for seropositivity. The overall seroprevalence of brucellosis in cattle was 4.7% (n=3076) and 4.2% in buffaloes (n=840). Bovids that were over 3 years of age, from the dry zone (annual rainfall 20-35 in.), and reared under an extensive management system had higher odds of being seropositive. Bovids from the dry zone were at approximately six times higher odds of being seropositive even after controlling for the possible effects of age and management system. Approximately 75% of the seropositive males were from the dry zone. Most bovids (84%) from the dry zone in this study were reared under an extensive management system (free grazing) which allows unrestricted contact between animals. These factors may have contributed to the spread of brucellosis in bovids in the dry zone. This infection might be an important cause of abortion in bovids in Sri Lanka. However, there is also evidence of other causes for abortion, repeat breeding and retained placenta.

Avaliação do teste de imunodifusão mediante emprego do polissacarídeo "O" no diagnóstico da brucelose bovina

Comparou-se o teste de imunodifusão dupla em ágar gel (IDGA) pelo emprego do polissacarídeo "O" como antígeno com os testes de soroaglutinação rápida, soroaglutinação lenta, 2-mercaptoetanol, reação de fixação de complemento e antígeno tamponado acidificado no diagnóstico da brucelose, em bovinos infectados, não infectados e recém-vacinados com a amostra B-19, visando à diferenciação de anticorpos vacinais daqueles associados à infecção natural pela Brucella abortus. Nenhum dos testes realizados permitiu diferenciar precisamente anticorpos vacinais daqueles induzidos pela infecção brucélica e, nas condições do presente trabalho, a utilização do IDGA com este objetivo poderia levar à retenção de animais infectados no rebanho.

Maintenance of Brucella abortus-free herds: a review with emphasis on the epidemiology and the problems in diagnosing brucellosis in areas of low prevalence

This review covers some epidemiological aspects that allow Brucella to survive, spread, and maintain itself in the environment. Because the success of maintaining Brucella-free herds is determined by the efficiency of the serological tests to detect a single infected animal the limitations of the traditional serological tests are emphasized. Serological tests cannot differentiate between cattle infected with Brucella and cattle infected with microorganisms that serologically cross-react with B. abortus antigen. These cattle and cattle with 'natural' antibodies jeopardize the Brucella-free status of a herd. Likewise, infected cattle with serologically inconclusive test results or which elude detection are also a hazard to Brucella-free herds. Since cattle that elude detection with serological tests and the presence of non-specific serum antibodies in healthy cattle have long been recognized as problems, it is opportune to reconsider the procedures currently used to diagnose brucellosis in individual animals. Use of the skin delayed-type hypersensitivity test in addition to serological tests will significantly improve the diagnosis of brucellosis. This will limit the financial loss incurred by outbreaks of brucellosis.

Field evaluation of an indirect ELISA for detection of brucellosis in lowland Bolivia

Bovine brucellosis exists endemically at an estimated prevalence of 10% in the developing dairy industry of Santa Cruz in tropical Bolivia. This paper describes field testing of an FAO/IAEA indirect ELISA for brucellosis, as a possible replacement confirmatory test for the complement fixation test (CFT). The ELISA and CFT were compared on sera from 3 cattle populations: a non-vaccinated negative population, an S19-vaccinated negative population, and a brucellosis-positive population of unknown vaccination status. The CFT and ELISA showed excellent specificities of 100% and 98% respectively against the negative non-vaccinated group. The CFT maintained a specificity of 98% against the S19-vaccinated negative group, but ELISA specificity fell to 83% using a cut-off of 20% of positive control, and 94% using a cut-off of 40% of positive control. Against sera from the positive population, the ELISA gave many more positive reactions than the CFT, probably a combination of both higher sensitivity and lower specificity. It is concluded that as Santa Cruz is entering a phase of brucellosis control rather than eradication, the extra sensitivity of the ELISA is not valuable enough to risk a higher level of false positive reactions, especially as S19 vaccination is being increasingly used.

Comparative evaluation of microagglutination test and serum agglutination test as supplementary diagnostic methods for brucellosis

The diagnosis of brucellosis in cattle and small ruminants requires the use of more than one serological test. The complement fixation test (CFT), the rose bengal test (RBT), and the serum agglutination test (SAT) are among the most useful tests for routine diagnosis. The microagglutination test (MAT) was developed as a simpler and more efficient test than the SAT. The relative efficacy of this test compared with that of the SAT was evaluated by using brucella-free sheep and goats prior to and after vaccination treatment. The specificities of the MAT and the SAT were 100%. Of the ewes and goats with a vaccination history, one ewe, expectedly a negative responder, had reactions in the MAT, the complement fixation test, and the rose bengal test but not in the SAT, suggesting a lower sensitivity of the SAT in this case. The calculated sensitivities of the MAT and the SAT were 93.9%. The agreement between MAT and SAT results from nonresponders was examined by using sera from unvaccinated lambs and kids (95.2% agreement), unvaccinated ewes and goats (84.4%), and ewes and goats with a vaccination history (43.9%). For the latter group higher levels of agglutination units were observed by the MAT than by the SAT in 51.5% of the samples. In testing sera from positive reactors after vaccination neither method was superior (MAT values were greater than SAT values for 23.5% of the samples, and MAT values were less than SAT values for 21.9% of the samples). Comparison of the methods on the individual sample level revealed a significant correlation between the MAT and the SAT (r = 0.96 +/- 0.005; P < 0.001). Since the MAT is simpler to perform than the SAT and can potentially be automated, the inclusion of the MAT as a supplementary test in brucellosis control programs is recommended.

Differentiation by western blotting of immune responses of cattle vaccinated with Brucella abortus strain 19 or infected experimentally or naturally with virulent Brucella abortus

Brucella abortus strain 19 salt-extractable proteins fractionated by differential ammonium sulfate precipitation were used in a western blotting method to detect bovine immunoglobulin G antibodies to B. abortus. Sera from infected cattle and from cattle vaccinated with strain 19 and subsequently exposed to virulent B. abortus bound to a common group of antigens ranging in molecular weights from 31,000 to 45,000 daltons. Immunoglobulin G antibodies in sera from the latter group in addition also bound to antigens with molecular weights of 66,000 to 71,000 daltons. Some sera from cattle vaccinated when sexually mature reacted similar to those from infected cattle, while immunoglobulin G antibodies in sera from Brucella-free cattle and vaccinated calves did not bind to either group of antigens. In general, fractionation of the proteins by ammonium sulfate precipitation offered no advantage for detecting differences between groups of sera. Ammonium sulfate fraction 0 to 35% reacted with a larger number of sera from a naturally infected group than fraction 0 to 70%. Both fractions reacted equally well with sera from the other groups of cattle, while fractions 35 to 70% and 70 to 100% reacted poorly in this technique. The attractive feature of the blot is that sera from calfhood-vaccinated cattle did not react.

Bovine brucellosis: evaluation of field sera by a competitive and superimposable ELISA utilising a monoclonal antibody against Brucella abortus lipopolysaccharide

With the aid of a horseradish peroxidase (HRP) tagged monoclonal antibody against smooth lipopolysaccharide from Brucella abortus (Bruce 1), a competitive and superimposable ELISA test procedure for bovine brucellosis has been evaluated for its ability to discriminate between Strain 19-vaccinated (S19-Vacc) and Biotype 1-infected (B1-Inf) cattle. In the competitive assay, all sera from S19-Vacc animals competed effectively against HRP-Bruce 1 (low HRP activity), while 10 out of 40 B1-Inf animals competed less effectively with Bruce 1 (high HRP activity). Successful competition by cattle antibodies would result in an increased proportion of cattle Igs binding to the assay antigen. This was confirmed by superimposing an alkaline phosphatase conjugated rabbit anti-cattle Ig after the competitive ELISA had been completed. With the superimposable assay, alkaline phosphatase activity was correspondingly high for S19-Vacc animals, and low for 36 out of 40 B1-Inf animals. The superimposable ELISA had therefore improved the discriminatory capabilities of the assay procedure from 75% to 90%.

A review of enzyme immunoassay for detection of antibody to Brucella abortus in cattle

Enzyme immunoassay has gained wide acceptance for serological diagnosis of bovine brucellosis because of its ability to detect antibody of all isotypes unlike the conventional tests. The indirect enzyme immunoassay, however, presents several parameters that require careful analysis. These parameters include the choice of antigen and antiglobulin-enzyme conjugate reagents for use in the assay, dealing with the large amount of data the semi-automatic or automatic assay can generate and the inter- and intralaboratory standardization and quality control. This review considers the various methods described in the literature and, briefly, how some of the problems have been overcome or how they might be dealt with.

Comparison of an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay using monoclonal antibodies and a complement fixation test for cattle vaccinated and infected with Brucella abortus

A competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) using a monoclonal antibody conjugated to horseradish peroxidase MA(A) and a complement fixation test (CFT) were applied to sera collected over a two-year period from 60 cattle challenged with Brucella abortus strain 544. Forty-eight of the cattle were previously vaccinated with B. abortus strain 19 (S19) or B. abortus strain 45/20 (45/20). After challenge 33 of the cattle remained uninfected and nine of the 27 infected cattle showed aberrant reactions by the CFT. The performance of the MA(A) ELISA was as follows: after vaccination, the MA(A) ELISA, like the CFT, was unable to differentiate infected cattle from those recently vaccinated with S19. After challenge the MA(A) ELISA gave results comparable with the CFT for those cattle with aberrant reactions. For the non-infected cattle there was a similar number of weeks after challenge when both tests were negative. It is suggested that the main advantage of the MA(A) ELISA when compared with the CFT lies in its relatively simple test procedure.