Improved high-performance liquid chromatographic method for the analysis of serum sotalol

Development an ion-pair liquid chromatographic method for determination of sotalol in plasma using a monolithic column

A rapid and sensitive ion-pair HPLC method using a monolithic column and fluorescence detection has been developed for quantification of sotalol in plasma. The assay enables the measurement of sotalol for therapeutic drug monitoring with a minimum quantification limit of 10 ng ml(-1). The analytical method involves simple, one-step protein precipitation and no extraction procedure is needed. Sample preparation is fast and the analytical recovery was complete. The separation was carried out in reversed-phase conditions using a Chromolith Performance (RP-18e, 100 mm x 4.6 mm) column at ambient temperature. The mobile phase was 10% acetonitrile, 0.001 M heptane sulfonic acid, 0.02 M sodium dihydrogen phosphate, and distilled water to 100%, adjusted to pH 5.5 at a flow rate of 1.8 ml/min. The excitation wavelength was set at 235 nm, emission at 300 nm. The calibration curve was linear over the concentration range 20-1500 ng ml(-1). The coefficients of variation for inter-day and intra-day assay were found to be less than 7%. The method has been applied to the determination of sotalol in plasma from 12 subjects dosed with racemic sotalol.

Fully automated LC method for the determination of sotalol in human plasma using restricted access material with cation exchange properties for sample clean-up

A simple and rapid fully automated bio-analytical method for the liquid chromatographic (LC) determination of sotalol in human plasma has been described. The method is based on the use of a new kind of porous silica restricted access material (RAM) with cation exchange properties for sample clean-up. 100 microl of plasma samples were directly injected into the precolumn coupled on-line to a reversed-phase column (RP-Select B) by means of column switching system. The plasma matrix was washed out for 10 min using a washing liquid composed of 2 mM lithium perchlorate and methanol (97:3; v/v). By rotation of the switching valve, the analytes were then eluted in back-flush mode for 2 min and transferred to the analytical column by the LC mobile phase constituted of a mixture of methanol and 50 mM potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.0) containing 1 mM 1-octanesulphonic acid sodium salt (20:80; v/v). The flow-rate was 1.0 ml/min and sotalol was detected using fluorescence detection at 235 and 300 nm as excitation and emission wavelengths, respectively. The method was then validated using a new approach based on accuracy profile over a concentration range from 5 to 500 ng/ml. The limit of quantitation (LOQ) was 5 ng/ml and the total analysis time was 19 min.

Enantioselective determination of (R)- and (S)-sotalol in human plasma by on-line coupling of a restricted-access material precolumn to a cellobiohydrolase I-based chiral stationary phase

A liquid chromatographic column-switching method for the enantioselective determination of (RS)-sotalol in plasma was developed and validated. The method is based on the on-line coupling of a precolumn filled with the restricted access material LiChrospher ADS to a cellobiohydrolase I-based chiral stationary phase (CSP). The plasma samples were injected onto the precolumn using a mobile phase containing 1% methanol in 10 mM phosphate buffer at pH 7.4 for 10 min for the removal of matrix components. The analytes were transferred to the CSP for their enantiomeric separation by backflushing the precolumn with 15% 2-propanol in 10 mM phosphate buffer (pH 7.0) including 0.05 mM EDTA. The quantitative determination of the sotalol enantiomers was possible upon addition of the internal standard (S)-atenolol. The method was validated showing a good linearity in the concentration range from 25 to 1000 microg l(-1) for each enantiomer. The average values of the intra- and inter-day variability were 1.17% and 3.42%, respectively, for (R)-sotalol and 1.24% and 1.99%, respectively, for (S)-sotalol. The applicability of the method to real world samples has been proven by means of two pharmacokinetic studies. They revealed that the pharmacokinetic properties of the sotalol enantiomers do not differ significantly neither for healthy young volunteers after single dose application nor for elder patients in the steady state.

Development and validation of an automated method for the liquid chromatographic determination of sotalol in plasma using dialysis and trace enrichment on a cation-exchange pre-column as on-line sample preparation

A fully automated method for the determination of sotalol in human plasma was developed, involving dialysis through a cellulose acetate membrane, clean-up and enrichment of the dialysate on a strong cation-exchange pre-column and subsequent liquid chromatographic (LC) analysis with UV detection. All sample handling operations were carried out by means of an ASTED system. Before starting dialysis, the trace enrichment column (TEC) was conditioned. The plasma sample, to which the internal standard (atenolol) was automatically added, was then loaded in the donor channel and was kept static while the dialysis liquid, consisting of 0.017 M acetic acid, was passed through the acceptor channel in successive pulses. After each pulse, the dialysate was dispensed onto the TEC. When dialysis was discontinued, the analytes were eluted from the TEC by the LC mobile phase by rotation of a switching valve and transferred to the analytical column packed with octyl silica. The LC mobile phase was a mixture of methanol and pH 7.0 phosphate buffer containing 1-octanesulfonate at a concentration of 7.5 x 10(-4) M (19:81; v/v). The UV detection was performed at 230 nm. The influence of several parameters of the dialysis and trace enrichment processes on analyte recovery and method selectivity was investigated. The method was then validated. The mean absolute recovery for sotalol was about 60%. The limit of quantitation was 25 ng/ml and R.S.D. for repeatability and intermediate precision obtained at a concentration level of 50 ng/ml were 4.3 and 5.8%, respectively.

A comparison of transvenous atrial defibrillation of acute and chronic atrial fibrillation and the effect of intravenous sotalol on human atrial defibrillation threshold

The comparative efficacy and safety of transvenous defibrillation for acute and chronic AF and the effect of antiarrhythmic agents on this therapy have not been evaluated. Transvenous atrial defibrillation was performed in 25 patients with chronic AF and 13 patients with acute AF by delivering R wave synchronized, biphasic shocks between the right atrium and coronary sinus. The lowest energy and voltage resulting in successful defibrillation were considered to be atrial defibrillation threshold (ADFT). Intravenous sotalol (1.5 mg/kg) was then given over 15 minutes and ADFT was determined again. The mean ADFT was 1.5 J and 3.6 J for acute and chronic AF, respectively, and the threshold was highly reproducible. Sotalol reduced ADFT in patients with acute AF while the reduction in chronic AF group was not significant. There was no significant increase in creatinine kinase nor reduction in blood pressure, but prolonged pause after successful defibrillation required ventricular supporting pacing. We conclude that transvenous atrial defibrillation is a safe and effective means for defibrillating both acute and chronic AF. ADFT was lower in acute AF than in chronic AF. ADFT was highly reproducible during repeated defibrillation. Sotalol reduced ADFT in acute AF and to a lesser extent in chronic AF, and increased the defibrillation success rate. Ventricular pacing will often be required because of prolonged pause after successful defibrillation.

Solid-phase extraction and derivatisation methods for beta-blockers in human post mortem whole blood, urine and equine urine

This paper details various rapid and sensitive methods for the extraction and derivatisation of propranolol, metoprolol, sotalol, atenolol, pindolol, timolol, oxprenolol, alprenolol and penbutolol in equine urine and in human post mortem whole blood and urine. Three solid-phase extraction methods are described involving the use of either XtrackT XRDAH515, Bond Elut Certify or Sep-Pak C18 cartridges. Two derivatisation methods are also described involving the formation of cyclised silyl or pentafluoropropionate derivatives with either chloromethyldimethylchlorosilane or pentafluoropropionic anhydride, respectively. Gas chromatographic-mass spectrometry analysis was carried out in select-ion monitoring mode. All these methods were evaluated using drug-free human post mortem blood, urine and equine urine fortified at various levels with the beta-blockers mentioned above. The application of some of these methods on a forensic case study is also presented. This work does not include samples from equine administration trials of beta-blockers.

Sotalol. An updated review of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic use in cardiac arrhythmias

Sotalol is a nonselective beta-adrenoceptor antagonist which prolongs cardiac repolarisation independently of its antiadrenergic action (class III antiarrhythmic properties). The antiarrhythmic action of sotalol appears to arise predominantly from its class III properties, and the drug exhibits a broader antiarrhythmic profile than the conventional beta-blockers. Sotalol is effective in controlling paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardias and the ventricular response to atrial fibrillation/flutter in Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome, in maintaining sinus rhythm after cardioversion of atrial fibrillation/flutter, and in preventing initiation of supraventricular tachyarrhythmias following coronary artery bypass surgery. Sotalol shows promise in the control of nonmalignant and life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias, particularly those associated with ischaemic heart disease. It is effective in suppressing complex forms of ventricular ectopy, displaying superior antiectopic activity to propranolol and metoprolol. The acute efficacy of sotalol in preventing reinduction of sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias and suppressing spontaneous episodes of these arrhythmias on Holter monitoring is translated into long term prophylactic efficacy against arrhythmia recurrence in approximately 55 to 85% of patients with refractory life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias. In addition, sotalol offers the advantage over the class I agents of reducing cardiac and all-cause mortality in the high risk population with life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias. The adverse effects of sotalol are primarily related to its beta-blocking activity and its class III property of prolonging cardiac repolarisation. Sotalol is devoid of overt cardiodepressant activity in patients with mild or moderate left ventricular dysfunction. The overall arrhythmogenic potential is moderately low, but torsade de pointes may develop in conjunction with excessive prolongation of the QT interval due to bradycardia, hypokalaemia or high plasma concentrations of the drug. In summary, sotalol displays a broad spectrum of antiarrhythmic activity, is haemodynamically well tolerated, and confers a relatively low proarrhythmic risk. It is likely to prove particularly appropriate in the treatment and prophylaxis of life-threatening ventricular tachyarrhythmias.

Simplified procedure for the determination of sotalol in plasma by high-performance liquid chromatography

A simple, specific and rapid reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatographic (HPLC) procedure for sotalol determination is described requiring small plasma volumes. The high recovery of sotalol from plasma and the high precision of measurement obviate the need for an internal standard. Plasma samples (300 microliters) were deproteinised with 50 microliters of 70% (w/w) perchloric acid in disposable glass tubes. After vortex-mixing and centrifugation, 30 microliters of 4 M K2HPO4 were added followed by gentle shaking. A 20-microliters aliquot was then injected (by autosampler) for HPLC analysis. Chromatography was performed on a glass-lined 250 mm x 4 mm 5-micron C18 steel column. The mobile phase was 6% (v/v) acetonitrile in 0.08 M KH2PO4 buffer (pH 4.6). The flow-rate was 0.8 ml/min. Detection was by fluorescence with excitation and emission wavelengths at 235 and 310 nm, respectively. The retention time for sotalol was 7.1 min. Calibration was linear from 0.16 to 10 micrograms/ml in plasma (r greater than 0.999 for detector response to sotalol). The minimum concentration for quantitation was 0.08 micrograms/ml [within assay coefficient of variation (C.V.) less than 5%]. Recovery was near quantitative (greater than 98%) and replicate (intra-assay precision was less than 5% C.V.). Analysis of samples (n = 10) at concentrations of 0.42 and 4.2 micrograms/ml gave mean values of 0.44 and 4.3 micrograms/ml, respectively. The inter-assay C.V. values were 4.5 and 2.2%, respectively. Other clinically used antiarrhythmic drugs did not interfere. This assay can be performed using other commercial C18 analytical columns by suitable adjustment of mobile phase flow-rate and acetonitrile composition.

Chromatography of beta-adrenergic blocking agents

The determination of beta-blockers has posed pharmaceutical analysts with a variety of problems arising from the essential characteristics of these compounds as bases and the variability of physicochemical properties of individual drugs. Liquid chromatography has become the favoured method of analysis and to a certain extent there is a standardised approach to analysis based on either solvent or solid-phase extraction and reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography coupled to fluorescence detection. The analyst must be aware of interactions occurring during extraction stages. All manipulations should be fully evaluated for individual drugs and metabolites prior to use. Other analytical options are chosen for specific or more demanding applications. The use of unmodified silicas for the liquid chromatography of beta-blockers (and other basic drugs) is an example of a potential alternative mode of chromatography. The stereoselectivity of the pharmacology of beta-blockers has spawned a great deal of literature describing the resolution of enantiomers by chromatographic methods. It is envisaged that this area will achieve greater prominence in the future as drug development pursues optical purity. The demand for the availability of enantiomerically pure pharmaceutical preparations will certainly see developments for preparative-scale separations as well as analytical methods and will surely promote developments in new and established methods of chromatography.

Kinetic determination of sotalol by oxidation with sodium vanadate

A kinetic method is described for the determination of sotalol. The method uses 0.033 M sodium vanadate to oxidize sotalol in 4 M sulphuric acid. The solution is heated at 90 degrees C and the absorbance is measured at 750 nm at a fixed time of 30 min. The concentration (c) of sotalol is calculated from the absorbance (A) by the equation: A = 0.04 + 0.0015625 c.

High-performance liquid chromatographic determination of beta-adrenoceptor blocking agents in body fluids

Several reports have been published reviewing high-performance liquid chromatographic (HPLC) methods for the determination of beta-adrenoceptor blocking agents (beta-blockers) in biological materials (Flouvat et al., 1981; Mehta, 1983; Marko and Soltés, 1984; Ahnoff et al., 1985; Tkaczyková and Safarík, 1987). Of these, the paper by Mehta (1983) briefly summarizes the interrelationship between physiocochemical properties of beta-blockers with prechromatographic treatment of biological samples, as well as with the HPLC methods used for the determination of 12 beta-adrenoceptor blocking drugs. The work by Ahnoff et al. (1985) concerning the monitoring of cardiovascular drugs also deals with HPLC assays of 18 beta-blockers in plasma. The Appendix to this report presents the great majority of HPLC methods for determining 30 beta-blockers in various body fluids. HPLC methods providing resolution and determination of individual beta-blocker enantiomers have not been included since this topic is being covered by Walle and Walle (1989). The Appendix is just a guide to the methods reviewed for the HPLC determination of parent beta-blockers as well as some of their metabolites co-assayed in various body fluids. It does not include details such as the internal standard, recovery, setting of the detector, limit of determination, etc., given in the individual methods listed. The isolation technique of the drug(s) from the given body fluid represents the main step in the sample work-up procedure. Along with this information, only the type of the HPLC column packing and the detection principle used by each method's developers are given.

Improved screening method for beta-blockers in urine using solid-phase extraction and capillary gas chromatography-mass spectrometry

An improved screening method for beta-blockers in urine is proposed, involving enzymatic hydrolysis, solid-phase extraction and capillary gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Several extraction methods for beta-blockers, such as conventional liquid-liquid and solid-phase extraction procedures, have been evaluated for at least eight beta-blockers. Additionally, the gas chromatographic properties and mass fragmentation of the trimethylsilyl-trifluoroacetyl, trifluoroacetyl and cyclic n-butylboronate derivatives of beta-blockers have been compared and evaluated with respect to their efficiency for screening urine. The resulting screening method proved to be a specific and sensitive procedure, enabling these analytes to be detected and identified up to 48 h after the administration of a dosage, usually encountered in doping cases.

A strategy for the determination of beta blockers in plasma using solid-phase extraction in combination with high-performance liquid chromatography

This paper describes a general approach for the therapeutic drug monitoring of 13 different beta blockers in plasma. The chromatographic system contains a cyanopropyl-bonded phase as a stationary phase in combination with a mobile phase composed of acetonitrile and phosphate buffer (pH = 3, mu = 0.05). Two modes of detection are used, namely, UV detection and fluorescence detection. The sample pretreatment is performed with a nitrile-sorbent in combination with methanol-phosphate buffer (pH = 3, mu = 0.05) or with methanol containing 0.1% propylamine as eluent. Acceptable recoveries are obtained for practolol, acebutolol, pindolol, oxprenolol, mepindolol, atenolol, propranolol, prenalterol, alprenolol, metoprolol, sotalol and nadolol. For labetalol, however, the elution recovery has to be improved. Finally, this approach is illustrated by the assay of nadolol in the plasma of patients suffering from hypertension, who had received an oral formulation of the drug.