A comparative study of two hormone replacement therapy regimens on safety and efficacy variables

Nonestrogen Therapies for Treatment of Genitourinary Syndrome of Menopause: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVE

To systematically review the literature and provide clinical practice guidelines regarding various nonestrogen therapies for treatment of genitourinary syndrome of menopause (GSM).

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE, EMBASE, ClinicalTrials.gov , and Cochrane databases were searched from inception to July 2021. We included comparative and noncomparative studies. Interventions and comparators were limited to seven products that are commercially available and currently in use (vaginal dehydroepiandrosterone [DHEA], ospemifene, laser or energy-based therapies, polycarbophil-based vaginal moisturizer, Tibolone, vaginal hyaluronic acid, testosterone). Topical estrogen, placebo, other nonestrogen products, as well as no treatment were considered as comparators.

METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION

We double-screened 9,131 abstracts and identified 136 studies that met our criteria. Studies were assessed for quality and strength of evidence by the systematic review group.

TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS

Information regarding the participants, details on the intervention and comparator and outcomes were extracted from the eligible studies. Alternative therapies were similar or superior to estrogen or placebo with minimal increase in adverse events. Dose response was noted with vaginal DHEA and testosterone. Vaginal DHEA, ospemifene, erbium and fractional carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) laser, polycarbophil-based vaginal moisturizer, tibolone, hyaluronic acid, and testosterone all improved subjective and objective signs of atrophy. Vaginal DHEA, ospemifene, tibolone, fractional CO 2 laser, polycarbophil-based vaginal moisturizer, and testosterone improved sexual function.

CONCLUSION

Most nonestrogen therapies are effective treatments for the various symptoms of GSM. There are insufficient data to compare nonestrogen options to each other.

The Effects of Menopause Hormone Therapy on Lipid Profile in Postmenopausal Women: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Importance: The incidence of dyslipidemia increases after menopause. Menopause hormone therapy (MHT) is recommended for menopause related disease. However, it is benefit for lipid profiles is inconclusive. Objective: To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to evaluate the effects of MHT on lipid profile in postmenopausal women. Evidence Review: Related articles were searched on PubMed/Medline, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases from inception to December 2020. Data extraction and quality evaluation were performed independently by two reviewers. The methodological quality was assessed using the "Cochrane Risk of Bias checklist". Results: Seventy-three eligible studies were selected. The results showed that MHT significantly decreased the levels of TC (WMD: -0.43, 95% CI: -0.53 to -0.33), LDL-C (WMD: -0.47, 95% CI: -0.55 to -0.40) and LP (a) (WMD: -49.46, 95% CI: -64.27 to -34.64) compared with placebo or no treatment. Oral MHT led to a significantly higher TG compared with transdermal MHT (WMD: 0.12, 95% CI: 0.04-0.21). The benefits of low dose MHT on TG was also concluded when comparing with conventional-dose estrogen (WMD: -0.18, 95% CI: -0.32 to -0.03). The results also showed that conventional MHT significantly decreased LDL-C (WMD: -0.35, 95% CI: -0.50 to -0.19), but increase TG (WMD: 0.42, 95%CI: 0.18-0.65) compared with tibolone. When comparing with the different MHT regimens, estrogen (E) + progesterone (P) regimen significantly increased TC (WMD: 0.15, 95% CI: 0.09 to 0.20), LDL-C (WMD: 0.12, 95% CI: 0.07-0.17) and Lp(a) (WMD: 44.58, 95% CI:28.09-61.06) compared with estrogen alone. Conclusion and Relevance: MHT plays a positive role in lipid profile in postmenopausal women, meanwhile for women with hypertriglyceridemia, low doses or transdermal MHT or tibolone would be a safer choice. Moreover, E + P regimen might blunt the benefit of estrogen on the lipid profile. Clinical Trial Registration: [https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42018092924], identifier [No. CRD42018092924].

Short-term and long-term effects of tibolone in postmenopausal women

BACKGROUND

Tibolone is a synthetic steroid used for the treatment of menopausal symptoms, on the basis of short-term data suggesting its efficacy. We considered the balance between the benefits and risks of tibolone.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of tibolone for treatment of postmenopausal and perimenopausal women.

SEARCH METHODS

In October 2015, we searched the Gynaecology and Fertility Group (CGF) Specialised Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, Embase and PsycINFO (from inception), the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) and clinicaltrials.gov. We checked the reference lists in articles retrieved.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing tibolone versus placebo, oestrogens and/or combined hormone therapy (HT) in postmenopausal and perimenopausal women.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard methodological procedures of The Cochrane Collaboration. Primary outcomes were vasomotor symptoms, unscheduled vaginal bleeding and long-term adverse events. We evaluated safety outcomes and bleeding in studies including women either with or without menopausal symptoms.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 46 RCTs (19,976 women). Most RCTs evaluated tibolone for treating menopausal vasomotor symptoms. Some had other objectives, such as assessment of bleeding patterns, endometrial safety, bone health, sexuality and safety in women with a history of breast cancer. Two included women with uterine leiomyoma or lupus erythematosus. Tibolone versus placebo Vasomotor symptomsTibolone was more effective than placebo (standard mean difference (SMD) -0.99, 95% confidence interval (CI) -1.10 to -0.89; seven RCTs; 1657 women; moderate-quality evidence), but removing trials at high risk of attrition bias attenuated this effect (SMD -0.61, 95% CI -0.73 to -0.49; odds ratio (OR) 0.33, 85% CI 0.27 to 0.41). This suggests that if 67% of women taking placebo experience vasomotor symptoms, between 35% and 45% of women taking tibolone will do so. Unscheduled bleedingTibolone was associated with greater likelihood of bleeding (OR 2.79, 95% CI 2.10 to 3.70; nine RCTs; 7814 women; I2 = 43%; moderate-quality evidence). This suggests that if 18% of women taking placebo experience unscheduled bleeding, between 31% and 44% of women taking tibolone will do so. Long-term adverse eventsMost of the studies reporting these outcomes provided follow-up of two to three years (range three months to three years). Breast cancerWe found no evidence of differences between groups among women with no history of breast cancer (OR 0.52, 95% CI 0.21 to 1.25; four RCTs; 5500 women; I2= 17%; very low-quality evidence). Among women with a history of breast cancer, tibolone was associated with increased risk (OR 1.5, 95% CI 1.21 to 1.85; two RCTs; 3165 women; moderate-quality evidence). Cerebrovascular eventsWe found no conclusive evidence of differences between groups in cerebrovascular events (OR 1.74, 95% CI 0.99 to 3.04; four RCTs; 7930 women; I2 = 0%; very low-quality evidence). We obtained most data from a single RCT (n = 4506) of osteoporotic women aged 60 to 85 years, which was stopped prematurely for increased risk of stroke. Other outcomesEvidence on other outcomes was of low or very low quality, with no clear evidence of any differences between the groups. Effect estimates were as follows:• Endometrial cancer: OR 2.04, 95% CI 0.79 to 5.24; nine RCTs; 8504 women; I2 = 0%.• Cardiovascular events: OR 1.38, 95% CI 0.84 to 2.27; four RCTs; 8401 women; I2 = 0%.• Venous thromboembolic events: OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.37 to 1.97; 9176 women; I2 = 0%.• Mortality from any cause: OR 1.06, 95% CI 0.79 to 1.41; four RCTs; 8242 women; I2 = 0%. Tibolone versus combined HT Vasomotor symptomsCombined HT was more effective than tibolone (SMD 0.17, 95% CI 0.06 to 0.28; OR 1.36, 95% CI 1.11 to 1.66; nine studies; 1336 women; moderate-quality evidence). This result was robust to a sensitivity analysis that excluded trials with high risk of attrition bias, suggesting a slightly greater disadvantage of tibolone (SMD 0.25, 95% CI 0.09 to 0.41; OR 1.57, 95% CI 1.18 to 2.10). This suggests that if 7% of women taking combined HT experience vasomotor symptoms, between 8% and 14% of women taking tibolone will do so. Unscheduled bleedingTibolone was associated with a lower rate of bleeding (OR 0.32, 95% CI 0.24 to 0.41; 16 RCTs; 6438 women; I2 = 72%; moderate-quality evidence). This suggests that if 47% of women taking combined HT experience unscheduled bleeding, between 18% and 27% of women taking tibolone will do so. Long-term adverse eventsMost studies reporting these outcomes provided follow-up of two to three years (range three months to three years). Evidence was of very low quality, with no clear evidence of any differences between the groups. Effect estimates were as follows:• Endometrial cancer: OR 1.47, 95% CI 0.23 to 9.33; five RCTs; 3689 women; I2 = 0%.• Breast cancer: OR 1.69, 95% CI 0.78 to 3.67; five RCTs; 4835 women; I2 = 0%.• Venous thromboembolic events: OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.09 to 2.14; four RCTs; 4529 women; I2 = 0%.• Cardiovascular events: OR 0.63, 95% CI 0.24 to 1.66; two RCTs; 3794 women; I2 = 0%.• Cerebrovascular events: OR 0.76, 95% CI 0.16 to 3.66; four RCTs; 4562 women; I2 = 0%.• Mortality from any cause: only one event reported (two RCTs; 970 women).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Moderate-quality evidence suggests that tibolone is more effective than placebo but less effective than HT in reducing menopausal vasomotor symptoms, and that tibolone is associated with a higher rate of unscheduled bleeding than placebo but with a lower rate than HT.Compared with placebo, tibolone increases recurrent breast cancer rates in women with a history of breast cancer, and may increase stroke rates in women over 60 years of age. No evidence indicates that tibolone increases the risk of other long-term adverse events, or that it differs from HT with respect to long-term safety.Much of the evidence was of low or very low quality. Limitations included high risk of bias and imprecision. Most studies were financed by drug manufacturers or failed to disclose their funding source.

Short and long term effects of tibolone in postmenopausal women

BACKGROUND

Tibolone is an option available for the treatment of menopausal symptoms, based on short-term data on its efficacy. However, there is a need to consider the balance between the benefits and risks of tibolone as there are concerns about breast and endometrial cancer as well as stroke.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of tibolone in treating postmenopausal women.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Menstrual Disorders and Subfertility Group (MDSG) Specialised Register (19 April 2011), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2011, 2nd Quarter), MEDLINE (from inception to 19 April 2011), EMBASE (1980 to week 3 April 2011), PsycINFO (1806 to week 3 April 2011), Clinical Trials.gov (30 April 2011). Individual researchers and the current manufacturer of tibolone were contacted to identify unpublished and ongoing trials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compared tibolone versus placebo, estrogens or combined hormone replacement therapy (HT) by assessing the percentage of women with menopausal symptoms, the severity of those symptoms and the occurrence of safety outcomes in postmenopausal women.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Four review authors independently extracted information from the articles, resolving discrepancies by consensus. All outcomes studied were dichotomous. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using the random-effects model. Heterogeneity of studies was taken into account before deciding to combine the data.

MAIN RESULTS

When compared to placebo, tibolone was more effective in relieving the frequency of vasomotor symptoms (two RCTs, n = 847; OR 0.42, 95% CI 0.25 to 0.69), although only the 2.5 mg/day dose of tibolone was significantly better than placebo; but with increased vaginal bleeding (seven RCTs, n = 7462; OR 2.75, 95% CI 1.99 to 3.80). When compared to equipotent doses of combined HT, tibolone reduced vaginal bleeding (15 RCTs, n = 6342; OR 0.32, 95% CI 0.24 to 0.42) but was less effective in relieving the frequency of vasomotor symptoms (two RCTs, n = 545; OR 4.16, 95% CI 1.50 to 11.58).As for long term safety, two major RCTs of tibolone versus placebo provided the most relevant data. An RCT of 3098 women with breast cancer and menopausal symptoms was halted after 3.1 years because of increased tumour recurrence (OR 1.50; 95% CI 1.21 to 1.85). However, in another RCT that selected osteoporotic women with negative mammograms (n = 4506) tibolone was associated with a reduction in breast cancer compared to placebo after 2.8 years (OR 0.32, 95% CI 0.13 to 0.79) although the trial was not specifically designed to assess that outcome and the number of overall events was low. In the same RCT, an excess risk of stroke was observed (OR 2.18, 95% CI 1.12 to 4.21). There was no clear evidence of a tibolone effect on endometrial cancer compared with placebo given the low number of events (seven RCTs, n = 8152; OR 1.98, 95% CI 0.73 to 5.32).There was no evidence of a difference in long term safety between tibolone and combined HT.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Tibolone, used at the daily dose of 2.5 mg, may be less effective than combined HT in alleviating menopausal symptoms although it reduced the incidence of vaginal bleeding. There was evidence that treatment with combined HT was more effective in managing menopausal symptoms than was tibolone. Available data on the long term safety of tibolone is concerning given the increase in the risk of breast cancer in women who had already suffered from breast cancer in the past and in a separate trial the increase in the risk of stroke in women whose mean age was over 60 years. Similar concerns may exist for estroprogestins but their overall benefit-risk profile is better known and is more directly related to women with menopausal symptoms.

An open-label study of subdermal implants of estradiol-only versus subdermal implants of estradiol plus nomegestrol acetate: effects on symptom control, lipid profile and tolerability

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effects of continuous 17-beta estradiol-only silastic implants with those of continuous 17-beta estradiol plus continuous nomegestrol acetate silastic implants on symptom control, lipid profile and tolerability in postmenopausal women.

METHODS

This was an open-label, parallel-group study. Women with and without uterus and no contraindications to hormone therapy (HT) in this study, we consider as HT the replacement of Estrogens-only and Estrogens + Progestogens Therapy, were enrolled. Each subject was assigned to receive four 17-beta estradiol-only silastic implants (women without uterus), or four 17-beta estradiol plus one nomegestrol acetate silastic implant (women with intact uterus), for 1 year.

RESULTS

A total of 40 subjects were enrolled and received, the silastic implants of which 40 (100.0%) subjects completed the study (n = 20, estradiol only; n = 20, estradiol plus nomegestrol acetate). The incidence of postmenopausal symptoms decreased significantly. No significant decreases in total cholesterol (1.3%), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (1.1%), triglycerides (1.2%) and fasting glucose ((1.3%) serum levels were observed in both groups, whereas high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol increased significantly (2.8%), during the study in both groups. The incidences of adverse events were similar in both treatment groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Women treated with 17-beta estradiol-only silastic implants or 17-beta estradiol plus nomegestrol acetate silastic implants showed significant improvement of postmenopausal symptoms, including urogenital and sexual health symptoms and a significant increase in HDL cholesterol and no significant differences in other lipid profiles and tolerability.

Tibolone for the treatment of moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms and genital atrophy in postmenopausal women

OBJECTIVE

To demonstrate the safety and efficacy of tibolone (1.25 and 2.5 mg) in the treatment of moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms and symptoms associated with vaginal atrophy.

DESIGN

A placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized, multicenter study was conducted on 396 healthy postmenopausal women experiencing a minimum of 7 moderate to severe hot flashes per day (60 per week). Participants were randomized to receive tibolone 1.25 or 2.5 mg or placebo once daily for 12 weeks. Assessments were done at weeks 4, 8, and 12. The severity and frequency of hot flashes were recorded in patient diaries on a daily basis.

RESULTS

Tibolone 2.5 mg significantly (P < 0.001) reduced the average number of hot flashes compared with placebo at week 4 (-7.82 vs -5.27), week 8 (-9.71 vs -5.86), and week 12 (-10.14 vs -5.85). The difference between tibolone 1.25 mg and placebo was significant (P < 0.001) at week 8 (-7.96) and week 12 (-8.32). Findings for the average daily severity of hot flashes were similar, with significantly greater reductions at week 4 (P < 0.05) and weeks 8 and 12 (P < 0.001) for tibolone 2.5 mg versus placebo and at weeks 8 and 12 for tibolone 1.25 mg versus placebo (P < 0.001). A menopausal atrophic symptom questionnaire revealed that tibolone 2.5 mg significantly (P < 0.05) reduced nocturia compared with placebo at weeks 4, 8, and 12 and urinary urgency at week 4. Compared with placebo, both doses of tibolone also significantly (P < 0.001) increased the vaginal maturation value from baseline. The overall incidence of adverse events was similar in all treatment groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Tibolone is effective and well tolerated for the treatment of moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms and the effects of vaginal atrophy associated with menopause.

The need for tissue selective menopausal agents

For decades, hormone therapy (HT) has been the mainstay for managing menopausal symptoms. However, fear of breast cancer, as well as side-effects such as breast pain and return of vaginal bleeding, have made many women stop HT or refuse to take it. There is therefore a clear need for alternative treatments. Recent years have seen the development of hormonal agents with selective effects, such as tibolone. Tibolone has a unique mode of action and is described as a STEAR (Selective Tissue Estrogenic Activity Regulator). The main action of tibolone is mediated through two 3-hydroxy metabolites; small amounts of a third metabolite are also found in the circulation. In the brain, the effect is estrogenic and perhaps androgenic and, as such, tibolone relieves hot flushes and improves energy and sexual well-being. The uterus converts tibolone and its hydroxy metabolites into a Delta4 metabolite that has a progestogenic effect. In the breast, the metabolites of tibolone inhibit key enzymes that result in estrogen depletion within the breast itself. Clinically, tibolone does not stimulate the breast and it does not increase mammographic density. There are several key large, placebo-controlled international trials of tibolone currently underway, one of which (LIBERATE) aims to test the safety of tibolone (vs placebo) in women with a history of breast cancer who are suffering from climacteric symptoms.

Hormone replacement therapy, selective estrogen receptor modulators, and tissue-specific compounds: cardiovascular effects and clinical implications

In industrialized countries, coronary heart disease (CHD) is not only the leading cause of death in women but of disability as well. Menopause, regardless of age at onset, is associated with a marked increase in CHD risk. Based on epidemiologic studies demonstrating mainly positive biologic effects of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) on CHD risk factors and outcomes, earlier recommendations decreed that most, if not all, postmenopausal women should be treated with long-term HRT. Recent randomized controlled trials with clinical CHD endpoints have shown that previously held dicta may not be accurate. Selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) such as tamoxifen and raloxifene are alternatives to HRT. SERMs represent a growing class of compounds that act as either estrogen receptor agonists or antagonists in a tissue-selective manner. This pharmacologic profile may offer the opportunity to dissociate favorable cardiovascular effects of estrogen from unfavorable stimulatory effects on the breast and endometrium. The only data available regarding the effects of tamoxifen on cardiovascular events in postmenopausal women are from breast cancer trials. They showed fewer fatal myocardial events in women randomly assigned to tamoxifen compared with women assigned to placebo. Raloxifene is a so-called second-generation SERM. It seems clear that raloxifene increases bone mineral density, has no effect on the endometrium, and holds high promise for the prevention of breast cancer. The effect of raloxifene on cardiovascular disease is uncertain. On the basis of the Multiple Outcomes of Raloxifene Evaluation (MORE) trial, raloxifene may offer some protection to women with cardiovascular disease or to those who are at high risk. Proof that raloxifene reduces the risk of CHD requires a clinical trial with hard clinical endpoints. Such a study is currently underway. Clinical trials have demonstrated that the synthetic 19-nortestosterone derivative tibolone reduces climacteric complaints and prevent osteoporosis without causing menstrual bleeding. Tibolone lowers lipoprotein(a), fibrinogen, and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 levels and improves glucose tolerance, insulin sensitivity, and endothelial function; however, it also lowers high-density lipoprotein cholesterol by >20%. The long-term impact of tibolone on the risk of CHD is not known and needs to be studied.

A randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover study of tibolone (Livial) on menopause symptoms, psychological well-being, and dyadic relationship of postmenopausal Chinese women and their spouses

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effects of 6-month treatment of tibolone on menopause symptoms, psychological well-being, and the dyadic relationship of postmenopausal Chinese women and their spouses.

DESIGN

A randomized, double-blind, crossover study was conducted in 100 postmenopausal Hong Kong Chinese women who received tibolone (2.5mg/day) and placebo. At baseline, 6-month and 13-month visits, the women filled in the Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS), 12-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ) and Dyadic Adjustment Scale (DAS), and their spouses completed GHQ and DAS.

RESULTS

Both tibolone and placebo treatment were associated with a significant reduction in the GCS total scores after the first 6-month interventional period (95% CI: -8.0 to -2.5 for tibolone, and -5.7 to -0.7 for placebo). After the correction for placebo response, tibolone treatment was associated with a significant reduction in the GCS somatic subscore (-1.1 +/- 0.4 for tibolone group versus 0.6 +/- 0.5 for placebo group, P < 0.05). There were no significant changes in the GHQ and DAS total scores of the women and their spouses after tibolone treatment, both with and without the correction for placebo response.

CONCLUSIONS

Tibolone treatment had a significant beneficial effect on the somatic menopause symptoms but had no effect on the psychological well-being or marital relationship of the postmenopausal Chinese women and their spouses.

Effect of tibolone and its metabolites on vascular endothelial growth factor isoforms 121 and 165 and thrombospondin-1 mRNA in Ishikawa cells

OBJECTIVE

To compare the mRNA expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) 121 and 165 isoforms and thrombospondin-1 (TSP-1) after incubation with tibolone and tibolone metabolites 3alpha-hydroxytibolone, 3beta-hydroxytibolone, Delta4-tibolone, and 17beta-estradiol (E2) in cultured Ishikawa cells.

DESIGN

Ishikawa cells (immortalized from a well-differentiated human adenocarcinoma cell line) were cultured in vitro to confluence. Tibolone, 3alpha-hydroxytibolone, 3beta-hydroxytibolone, Delta4-tibolone and E2 at concentrations of 1.0, 0.1 and 0.01 micromol/L were added to confluent cells and further cultured for an additional 24 h. Control cells were treated with medium in absence of hormone. Total RNA was extracted from control and treated Ishikawa cells. After reverse transcription, VEGF, TSP-1 and the housekeeping gene, beta-actin cDNAs, were amplified in a polymerase chain reaction spiked with 33p-dCTP. Relative abundance of VEGF 121 and 165 isoforms and TSP-1 mRNA was measured by scintillation spectroscopy.

RESULTS

E2, tibolone, 3alpha-hydroxytibolone, and 3beta-hydroxytibolone increased both VEGF 121 and 165 mRNA compared with the control. However, Delta4-tibolone had no effect on either VEGF 121 or 165 mRNA compared with the control. Delta4-Tibolone increased TSP-1 mRNA expression compared with control levels. E2, tibolone, 3alpha-hydroxytibolone, and 3beta-hydroxytibolone did not increase TSP-1 mRNA expression at any concentration.

CONCLUSIONS

Tibolone and the 3alpha- and 3beta-tibolone metabolites with E2 increased VEGF 121 and 165 isoforms. Conversely, Delta4-tibolone, which is reported to have progestational-like activity, did not stimulate VEGF 121 and VEGF 165 but increased TSP-1 mRNA synthesis in cultured Ishikawa cells. We hypothesize, based on these data, that the clinical finding of no endometrial growth in women using tibolone may be partly related to alterations in these angiogenic factors.

Les alternatives au traitement hormonal substitutif de la ménopause : le point épidémiologique

OBJECTIVE

Recent results put into question the risks/benefits ratio of hormone replacement therapy and emphasize the importance of precise knowledge of the effects of other treatments that exist for postmenopausal symptoms or diseases. Our aim is to analyze their effect.

METHODS

A review of randomized trials or epidemiological studies was undertaken.

RESULTS

Bisphophonates, calcitonin, parathormone, strontium ranelate, calcium and vitamin D have specific effects on bone. The efficacy of bisphophonates for prevention and treatment of osteoporosis has been proven and parathormone and strontium ranelate seem promising. These treatments are useful for women at high risk of osteoporosis who do not suffer from menopausal symptoms. Tibolone, SERMs and phytoestrogens exert effects on various tissues. SERMs are very promising, but they do not improve climacteric symptoms and their long term effects are still unknown. Tibolone has beneficial effects on climacteric symptoms and on bone loss, but recent results concerning its effects on the risk of breast cancer call into question its interest. The beneficial effects of phytoestrogens on bone and on vasomotor symptoms need to be confirmed.

CONCLUSION

At this time, none of the existing treatments for postmenopausal symptoms or diseases is ideal. The existence of several options for treatments of symptoms or diseases of the postmenopause is helpful as it affords several choices for physicians and for women who sometimes need to be treated for many years. However several questions remain unanswered concerning the long term effects of these treatments.

A comparative review of the risks and benefits of hormone replacement therapy regimens

The Women's Health Initiative (a large, randomized, placebo-controlled trial) investigated the effect of conjugated equine estrogens combined with medroxyprogesterone acetate on specific potential long-term benefits and risks. A review of the clinical studies that have investigated different types and regimens of estrogens combined with progestins was conducted to assess how applicable the results of the Women's Health Initiative are to hormone replacement therapy regimens in general. The studies that were reviewed were limited to randomized clinical trials and observational studies that have been published over the last 15 years (1987-2002) and to meta-analyses and reviews that may have included the literature before 1987. The increased risks for venous thromboembolism, stroke, coronary heart disease, and breast cancer that were identified in the Women's Health Initiative trial have also been reported with postmenopausal hormone therapies that contain a variety of estrogen and progestin products. The beneficial effects that were noted in the Women's Health Initiative, with respect to reductions in fractures and colorectal cancer, have not been evaluated in large, randomized controlled trials that use different estrogen/progestin combinations; however, observational trials that used a variety of estrogen or hormone replacement therapy products and randomized clinical studies that evaluated bone mineral density (an excellent predictor of fracture risk) with different estrogen/hormone replacement therapy regimens would suggest that results would be similar to those found in the Women's Health Initiative. Although the relief of menopausal symptoms, the primary reason women seek treatment, was not included in the overall benefit/risk analysis of the Women's Health Initiative, numerous trials suggest that all therapies are effective. Overall, these data indicate that the benefit/risk analysis that was reported in the Women's Health Initiative can be generalized to all postmenopausal hormone replacement therapy products.

Menopause: new therapies

The risk-benefit ratio of traditional postmenopausal hormone therapy is considered by many to be unacceptable. Low-dose oestrogen-progestin therapy (oral or non-oral and continuous or pulsatile) may have a better risk-benefit ratio, but this remains unproven. Steroids with selective tissue activation, such as tibolone, alleviate symptoms and protect against bone loss, but long-term safety data are lacking. Selective oestrogen receptor modulators (SERMs), such as raloxifene, prevent bone loss when used alone, and may soon be combined with oestradiol to treat symptoms and prevent osteoporotic fracture. Effects of SERMs on the cardiovascular system are currently being evaluated.

Hormone replacement therapy: current controversies

Postmenopausal hormonal therapy is used to manage the climacteric symptoms that impair the quality of life of a substantial number of women. The difficulty is achieving the desired effects with minimal side-effects and no adverse health risks. Fundamental to this is understanding the physiology of oestrogen in women and the metabolism of the therapeutic compounds. Although the effects of oral oestrogen therapy have been studied extensively, there is insufficient evidence to assess adequately the independent effects of progestin use, other oestrogen compounds, differing doses and duration of treatment. We have reviewed some basic concepts of oestrogen physiology and how these relate to exogenous oestrogen administration, the risks of greatest concern, and the role of androgens and newer treatment alternatives.

Dose-response analysis of effects of tibolone on climacteric symptoms

OBJECTIVE

To assess the clinically optimal tibolone dose for the relief of climacteric complaints.

DESIGN

A randomised, double blind, placebo-controlled trial.

SETTING

Twenty-eight centres in Norway, The Netherlands, Sweden and Finland.

POPULATION

Seven hundred and seventy-five healthy postmenopausal women were randomised to tibolone in a daily dose of 0.625, 1.25, 2.5 or 5.0 mg or placebo for 12 weeks.

METHODS

At baseline, and after 4, 8 and 12 weeks, hot flushes, sweating, vaginal bleeding and adverse experiences were recorded.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Change in frequency and intensity of hot flushes and sweating over 12 weeks.

RESULTS

From week four onwards, 2.5 and 5.0 mg tibolone were significantly more effective than placebo, regarding the frequency of hot flushes and sweating (P < 0.001), whereas the 0.625 mg dose was not significantly different from placebo during the study. The frequency of hot flushes with the 1.25 mg dose was statistically significantly different from placebo, only from week eight onwards. The incidence of dropouts due to insufficient therapeutic effect was much higher in the tibolone 1.25 mg group (9.5%) than in the 2.5 (1.9%) and 5.0 mg (1.3%) groups. A dose-related increase in incidence of vaginal bleeding or spotting was observed (P < 0.0001). Bleeding incidence in the 5.0 mg dose group was about twice as high as in the 2.5 mg dose group. There was no difference in incidence of adverse experiences between the 2.5- and the 1.25 mg dose group.

CONCLUSION

A daily dose of 2.5 mg tibolone is the clinically optimal dose for the treatment of climacteric complaints in postmenopausal women.

The effects of tibolone on mood and libido

OBJECTIVE

To review published data pertaining to the effects of tibolone on sexual parameters, mood, and cognitive function in postmenopausal women.

DESIGN

A review of all relevant published, peer-reviewed studies.

RESULTS

Tibolone is a compound that can be selectively metabolized by individual tissues to its estrogenic, progestogenic, or androgenic metabolites and hence exhibits tissue-specific hormonal effects. Tibolone also lowers sex hormone binding globulin, thus increasing free estradiol and testosterone levels. Tibolone alleviates climacteric vasomotor symptoms and displays a dominant progestogenic effect on the endometrium. Tibolone normalizes the vaginal karyopyknotic and maturation indexes and alleviates symptomatic atrophic vaginitis. Women treated with tibolone report significant reductions in vaginal dryness and dyspareunia, effects that may be secondary to both estrogenic and androgenic actions. Randomized studies indicate tibolone has positive effects on mood compared with placebo and alleviates several adverse mood parameters to a similar extent as conventional hormone replacement therapy. Improved mood is associated with increased plasma beta-endorphin. With respect to cognition, tibolone seems to improve semantic memory but does not significantly improve recognition memory. Tibolone is associated with improvements in sexual function that seem to be greater than those achieved with standard hormone replacement therapy.

CONCLUSION

Published studies indicate beneficial effects of tibolone on both libido and mood, which otherwise significantly compromise physical, psychological, and social well-being. Hence, tibolone provides another option for menopausal women experiencing loss of libido as part of their symptomatology or who have persistent low libido despite adequate estrogen/progestin replacement therapy.

Effects of postmenopausal hormone replacement therapy on lipid, lipoprotein, and apolipoprotein (a) concentrations: analysis of studies published from 1974-2000

OBJECTIVE

To establish reference estimates of the effects of different hormone replacement therapy (HRT) regimens on lipid and lipoprotein levels.

DESIGN

Review and pooled analysis of prospective studies published up until the year 2000.

SETTING

Clinical trials centers, hospitals, menopause clinics.

PATIENT(S)

Healthy postmenopausal women.

INTERVENTION(S)

Estrogen alone, estrogen plus progestogen, tibolone, or raloxifene in the treatment of menopausal symptoms.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Serum high- and low-density lipoprotein (HDL and LDL) cholesterol, total cholesterol, triglycerides, and lipoprotein (a).

RESULT(S)

Two-hundred forty-eight studies provided information on the effects of 42 different HRT regimens. All estrogen alone regimens raised HDL cholesterol and lowered LDL and total cholesterol. Oral estrogens raised triglycerides. Transdermal estradiol 17-beta lowered triglycerides. Progestogens had little effect on estrogen-induced reductions in LDL and total cholesterol. Estrogen-induced increases in HDL and triglycerides were opposed according to type of progestogen, in the order from least to greatest effect: dydrogesterone and medrogestone, progesterone, cyproterone acetate, medroxyprogesterone acetate, transdermal norethindrone acetate, norgestrel, and oral norethindrone acetate. Tibolone decreased HDL cholesterol and triglyceride levels. Raloxifene reduced LDL cholesterol levels. In 41 studies of 20 different formulations, HRT generally lowered lipoprotein (a).

CONCLUSION(S)

Route of estrogen administration and type of progestogen determined differential effects of HRT on lipid and lipoprotein levels. Future work will focus on the interpretation of the clinical significance of these changes.

Lipid effects, effectiveness and acceptability of tibolone versus transdermic 17 beta-estradiol for hormonal replacement therapy in women with surgical menopause

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effectiveness of tibolone and 17 beta-estradiol on climacteric symptoms, lipid and biochemical parameters in women with surgical menopause.

METHODS

In a prospective randomised clinical trial group comparative study, the effects on the aforementioned parameters, as well as treatment compliance and side effects were studied with oral tibolone 2.5 mg per day and with transdermic 17 beta-estradiol at 50 microg per day for a period of 12 months. Statistical analysis was carried out using the Fisher-test, analysis of the variance (ANOVA) for the two factors and the Bouferoni test.

RESULTS

Lipid metabolism analysis showed lower levels of HDL and triglycerides in the tibolone group. Other biochemical parameters were not affected. Similar reductions in climacteric symptoms were found in both the groups, but the tibolone group revealed a greater improvement in psychological problems and in sexual behaviour. No differences were observed with respect to compliance and side effects.

CONCLUSIONS

Tibolone is as effective or more than 17 beta-estradiol in reducing climacteric symptoms, and shows greater triglyceride and total cholesterol improvements. Tibolone is a good alternative to estrogens in women with surgical menopause.

The comparison of effects of tibolone and conjugated estrogen-medroxyprogesterone acetate therapy on sexual performance in postmenopausal women

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effects of two different postmenopausal regimens on sexual performance.

METHODS

A single blind prospective clinical study was planned on fifty natural postmenopausal women with no absolute contraindication for hormone replacement therapy (HRT). A total of 25 women were randomized for tibolone therapy (group T) and the rest 25 for continuous conjugated estrogen (CE) 0. 625 mg plus medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) 2.5 mg (group E) for a year. Two women in group T and four women in group E were excluded from the study as they didn't attend the control visit. At baseline and after a year, sexual performance parameters (sexual desire, coital frequency, orgasm frequency, vaginal dryness/dyspareunia) and after therapy subjective well-being, vasomotor symptoms, and side effects were assessed by score method designed by us.

RESULTS

Treatment with either preparation significantly improved subjective well-being, vasomotor symptoms and vaginal dryness. The rates of overall side effects between two groups were not found statistically different (P=0.84). Tibolone therapy increased sexual desire and coital frequency (P=0.001, P=0.014).

CONCLUSIONS

Both tibolone and continuous combined CE/MPA effectively improve the findings of hypoestrogenism and subjective well being. Moreover, tibolone effectively increases sexual performance. It is seen that tibolone with acceptable androgenic side effects can be an appropriate selection for HRT in postmenopausal women with decreased sexual desire.

High resolution ultrasound assessment of the carotid artery: its relevance in postmenopausal women and the effects of tibolone on carotid artery ultrastructure

OBJECTIVES

Hormone replacement therapy protects from cardiovascular disease at the menopause in part by reduction of menopausal pro-atherogenic serum lipid changes. Tibolone has beneficial effects on lipids, although serum high density lipoprotein levels decrease. This study aimed primarily to establish the effects of long-term administration of tibolone on a new surrogate marker for cardiovascular disease risk, the measurement of carotid artery intima-media thickness (CIMT) using high-resolution ultrasound.

METHODS

Measurement of CIMT and assessment of carotid atherosclerotic plaques were undertaken in 31 women on tibolone and 30 voluntary controls from an ongoing open-label study of tibolone.

RESULTS

The two groups were comparable, except for mean age and prevalence of current smokers. Repeatability of CIMT measurements was acceptable (CV, 10.0%). CIMT was significantly thicker in those with atherosclerotic plaques and increased systolic blood pressure. Prevalence of plaques was raised in those who had ever smoked, and those with elevated systolic blood pressure. There was no influence of tibolone on CIMT, whether plaques were present or not.

CONCLUSIONS

This reliable technique demonstrates associations between CIMT and established risk factors. CIMT was significantly thicker in those with existing plaques. We did not demonstrate an effect of long-term tibolone use on either CIMT or prevalence of plaques.

Wellness in women after 40 years of age: the role of sex hormones and pheromones

In the past twenty years hundreds of peer-reviewed studies have provided a significant body of information to guide the health care of women in the second halves of their lives. The harmonic nature of the fertile reproductive system forms the background against which hormonal replacement therapy can be understood to best serve women. In addition, the 1986 discovery of human pheromones and the subsequent 1998 confirmation of their existence increases certain sexual options for maturing women. Not all hormonal replacement therapies and wellness regimens serve women well. Some regimens have the potential to produce disease, especially over-the-counter remedies like dehydroepiandrosterone and the formulas that contain estrogen. Some regimens profoundly improve the quality of life of many women; some women do not need or want such regimens. All sex hormones affect physiologic systems including the cardiovascular system, bone metabolism, cognitive function, sexual response, and sexual attractiveness. The 7 years before menopause have recently been revealed to be an extremely complex era. During this period, some women increase their estrogen levels to new lifetime highs; others start an unequivocal decline, and still others vary from month to month. Coupled to this variability in estrogen is an equally variable set of changes in progesterone secretion by the ovary as androgen secretion patterns also change. Many women show increases in circulating androgens while many others show deficiencies. Both the adrenal and the ovarian sources of these hormones show age-related changes that alter a woman's capacity to attract sexual attention through both her physical appearance (and condition) and her pheromonal excretions. The complex contributions to the overall health of a woman may not always be understood. Often a hysterectomy can exacerbate--rather than ameliorate--the conditions that led to the surgery. One in 2 American women is offered a hysterectomy, a rate 5 times higher than that of the European countries for which data are available. Ninety percent of hysterectomies are not related to cancer; they are elective procedures. Avoidance of elective hysterectomy helps prevent its side effects: sexual deficits, acceleration of cardiovascular and bone disease, and more rapid aging. No efficacy data exist that suggest that elective hysterectomy works better than the alternative approaches that do not induce these side effects. The health and well-being of women who have already had hysterectomies, with or without ovariectomies, can be improved by a recognition of the cascade of difficulties that must addressed. Estrogen, progesterone, and androgens all tend to be compromised by hysterectomy; all should be considered for replacement. Because hormonal regimens can be prescribed to enhance the quality of life, the review of the available research can allow the medical art to greatly benefit mature women. Not surprisingly, the emerging conclusion reveals that structurally human hormones, prescribed appropriately, almost always best serve the patient.

A double-blind, randomised trial comparing the effects of tibolone and continuous combined hormone replacement therapy in postmenopausal women with menopausal symptoms

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effects of two postmenopausal regimens on menopausal symptoms, bleeding episodes, side effects and acceptability.

DESIGN

Double-blind, randomised controlled trial.

SETTING

Twenty-nine sites in Denmark, nine in Norway and six in Sweden.

PARTICIPANTS

Four hundred and thirty-seven postmenopausal women with menopausal complaints. None of these women had had a hysterectomy.

INTERVENTIONS

Daily treatment with tibolone 2.5 mg (n = 218) or 17beta-oestradiol 2 mg plus norethisterone acetate 1 mg (E2/NETA) (n = 219).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Hot flushes, sweating episodes, vaginal dryness, assessment of sexual life and bleeding patterns; at baseline and after 4, 12, 24 and 48 weeks.

RESULTS

Treatment with either preparation significantly reduced mean scores for hot flushes, sweating episodes and vaginal dryness. The overall discontinuation rate was 28% (tibolone 25%, E2/NETA 31%; P = 0.14), mostly during the first six months. There was a markedly lower cumulative incidence of bleeding or spotting episodes with tibolone compared with E2/NETA (P < 0.0001), mainly during the first six treatment cycles.

CONCLUSIONS

Both tibolone and E2/NETA effectively alleviate menopausal symptoms. However, tibolone caused significantly fewer bleeding or spotting episodes, which were reflected by lower overall rates of bleeding, as well as lower drop-out rates due to bleeding.

Nonestrogen management of menopausal symptoms

Women who cannot or choose not to take estrogens do have alternatives; however, the options are few and unproven in longterm clinical trials with respect to safety and efficacy. Many available alternative treatments may alleviate the symptoms of the menopause, but do not convey long-term protection against osteoporosis and cardiovascular disease. This article reviews treatment alternatives to estrogen replacement therapy for symptomatic relief.

Vaginal ultrasound of the endometrium in postmenopausal women with symptoms of urogenital atrophy on low-dose estrogen or tibolone treatment: a comparison

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy of locally administered low-dose estrogens (0.625 mg of conjugated estrogens) and orally administered tibolone in postmenopausal women with symptoms and signs of atrophic vaginitis. Vaginal ultrasound was performed for the evaluation of endometrial or ovarian abnormalities.

METHODS

A 6-month comparative randomised prospective study of women taking tibolone and locally administered low-dose estrogens. Seventy two postmenopausal women with symptoms of atrophic vaginitis were examined with vaginal ultrasound. The endometrial thickness, the endometrial volume, the uterus and the ovaries were measured before and after 6 months of treatment with low-dose estrogens or tibolone.

RESULTS

In group A (low-dose estrogens treatment) the mean endometrial thickness, before and after treatment, was 3.0 +/- 0.1 mm and 2.9 +/- 0.8 mm, respectively. The mean ovarian volume was 3.9 ml. There were no changes in uterine volume during the treatment period. In group B (treated with tibolone) endometrial thickness was 3.2 +/- 0.3 mm and 3.2 +/- 0.7 mm, respectively. One women experienced vaginal bleeding. The volume of corpus uteri was unchanged after treatment. The volume of both ovaries was 4.2 ml and 3.9 ml, respectively. The overall acceptability of both types of administration was good.

CONCLUSIONS

This study, using vaginal ultrasound, has shown that either hormone replacement therapy with tibolone or symptomatic treatment with low-dose estrogens, gives no sign of endometrial proliferation measured as endometrial thickness.