Cyclical pamidronate infusions in postmenopausal osteoporosis

Lipid metabolism within the bone micro-environment is closely associated with bone metabolism in physiological and pathophysiological stages

Recent advances in society have resulted in the emergence of both hyperlipidemia and obesity as life-threatening conditions in people with implications for various types of diseases, such as cardiovascular diseases and cancer. This is further complicated by a global rise in the aging population, especially menopausal women, who mostly suffer from overweight and bone loss simultaneously. Interestingly, clinical observations in these women suggest that osteoarthritis may be linked to a higher body mass index (BMI), which has led many to believe that there may be some degree of bone dysfunction associated with conditions such as obesity. It is also common practice in many outpatient settings to encourage patients to control their BMI and lose weight in an attempt to mitigate mechanical stress and thus reduce bone pain and joint dysfunction. Together, studies show that bone is not only a mechanical organ but also a critical component of metabolism, and various endocrine functions, such as calcium metabolism. Numerous studies have demonstrated a relationship between metabolic dysfunction in bone and abnormal lipid metabolism. Previous studies have also regarded obesity as a metabolic disorder. However, the relationship between lipid metabolism and bone metabolism has not been fully elucidated. In this narrative review, the data describing the close relationship between bone and lipid metabolism was summarized and the impact on both the normal physiology and pathophysiology of these tissues was discussed at both the molecular and cellular levels.

Use of pamidronate for osteoporosis treatment in public health care in Brazil

PURPOSE

The use of bisphosphonates for osteoporosis is effective in reducing the risk of fractures. However, oral formulations are sometimes not well tolerated or are contraindicated. Due to its availability in Brazilian public health system, pamidronate is frequently prescribed for osteoporosis, despite the lack of studies demonstrating its anti-fracture efficacy and the absence of FDA or EMEA approval for this purpose. The aim of this study was to evaluate the bone mineral density (BMD) response to pamidronate in a group of women with osteoporosis in a tertiary care hospital.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The medical records of women with osteoporosis who received pamidronate for up to two years of treatment were reviewed. Patients were stratified at high or intermediate risk of fracture.

RESULTS

A total of 70 women were in treatment with pamidronate. Among them, 74% were at high risk of fracture. A significant gain in spine BMD after 24 months of treatment was observed (p=0.012). There was no difference between the groups of high and not high risk of fracture. At the femur, no significant increase in BMD was present, though, a strong negative correlation with high PTH levels (r=-0.61; p=0.003) was seen. In the multivariate analysis BMI at 12 months had impact in the response to the treatment.

CONCLUSION

The intravenous pamidronate in a group of postmenopausal women with predominant high risk of fracture promoted an isolated gain in the spine BMD, even though, clinical randomized trials are needed to confirm its anti-fracture efficacy.

Trial watch: Tumor-targeting monoclonal antibodies for oncological indications

An expanding panel of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) that specifically target malignant cells or intercept trophic factors delivered by the tumor stroma is now available for cancer therapy. These mAbs can exert direct antiproliferative/cytotoxic effects as they inhibit pro-survival signal transduction cascades or activate lethal receptors at the plasma membrane of cancer cells, they can opsonize neoplastic cells to initiate a tumor-targeting immune response, or they can be harnessed to specifically deliver toxins or radionuclides to transformed cells. As an indication of the success of this immunotherapeutic paradigm, international regulatory agencies approve new tumor-targeting mAbs for use in cancer patients every year. Moreover, the list of indications for previously licensed molecules is frequently expanded to other neoplastic disorders as the results of large, randomized clinical trials become available. Here, we discuss recent advances in the preclinical and clinical development of tumor-targeting mAbs for oncological indications.

Tolerability of intravenous pamidronate for the treatment of osteoporosis and other metabolic osteopathies: A retrospective analysis

BACKGROUND

Intravenous disodium pamidronate has been described in the treatment of several osteopathies. Although tolerability has been found to be good in clinical trials, some mild to serious adverse events (AEs) have been reported.

OBJECTIVES

The aims of this study were to analyze the toelrability of IV pamidronate in patients being treated for osteoporosis and other metabolic osteopathies and to describe particular patients with relative contraindications, because such cases are not commonly seen in daily clinical practice.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of patients with different osteopathies who were administered IV infusions of pamidronate at doses ranging from 15 to 90 mg/infusion and 15 to 900 mg/year. The study was conducted in patients who had received treatment at the Institute of Metabolic Investigations, University of Salvador, Buenos Aires, Argentina, between January 1995 and December 2003. To rule out dose-related AEs, a comparison was made between patients who received fewer IV infusions and had cumulative doses of 120 to 180 mg/y (less frequent administration [LFA] group) and those patients who received regular infusions and had cumulative doses of >180 mg/year (frequent administration [FA] group). To confirm data obtained from medical records and to assess the occurrence of AEs, attempts were made to interview all patients by phone. The following information was verified for each patient included in the study: the reason for treatment, documented evidence of current diagnostic criteria, and whether the dose administered was adequate to treat the patient's condition.

RESULTS

Six hundred eight patients (464 [76.3%]women, 144 [23.7%]men; mean [SD] age, 69 [10] years) with various osteopathies (osteoporosis, 367 [60.4%] of the patients; Paget's disease, 172 [28.3%]; Sudeck's disease, 63 [10.4%]; multiple myeloma, 3 [0.5%]; and bone metastases, 3 [0.5%]) were administered a total of 2933 IV infusions of pamidronate during the study period. We were able to confirm the clinical records of 69.4% (422/608) of the patients by telephone survey; 29.9% (124/415) of those patients experienced extraskeletal AEs (most commonly fever and flu-like symptoms [eg, headache, malaise, fatigue, chills, and asthenia]). The percentage of patients reporting AEs was significantly higher for the LFA group than that of the FA group (91.2 vs 19.5; P < 0.001), although factors other than the frequency of treatment might have had a bearing on this finding. All AEs were mild and transient in both groups of patients, and there were no reports of jaw osteonecrosis in either group. It should be noted that although LFA patients received lower doses of pamidronate per infusion than the FA group, they had higher cumulative doses/year. Biochemical variables for the entire study population were compared with baseline measurements, and no significant changes in mean values were observed. Both serum calcium and 25-hydroxy vitamin D levels remained within normal ranges. On the other hand, there was a transient decrease in white blood cell count (WBCC) in 73 (12.0%) patients, and leukopenia was observed in 8 (1.3%) patients. However, 5 of the 6 patients who were leukopenic at the beginning of treatment had normal WBCCs during follow-up. Platelet count decreased significantly in 20 (3.3%) patients, and 5 (0.8%) patients developed thrombocytopenia. Serum creatinine (sCreat) levels increased significantly in 91 (15.0%) patients. This increase was transient and within normal limits (0.6-1.2 mg/dL) in 79 (86.8%) of those patients but persistent in the other 12 (13.2%), all of whom received higher doses of pamidronate or had other risk factors for renal failure such as advanced age, diabetes, multiple myeloma, or an obstructor disease. Baseline sCreat level for 7 of these 12 patients was >1.20 mg/dL.

CONCLUSIONS

Pamidronate administered IV was well tolerated when used for treating osteoporosis or other metabolic osteopathies in our study population. The clinical AEs observed with IV pamidronate administration were not serious and hematologic changes were mild, transient, and not associated with dose, time of treatment, or any particular underlying disease. An increase in sCreat level was the most frequent biochemical complication and was found in patients with additional risk factors for renal failure and particular diseases. Whether certain patients with risk factors for osteoporosis may require even fewer IV administrations of the drug is an issue that remains to be elucidated.

Bisphosphonates for postmenopausal osteoporosis

Bisphosphonates are effective in reducing bone turnover, increasing BMD and reducing fracture risk in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. The licensed bisphosphonates exhibit some differences in potency and speed of onset and offset of action. These differences mean that different agents may be more advantageous in different situations. Uncertainties still exist around the optimum duration of treatment and treatment holidays, how best to use bisphosphonates with anabolic treatments, and the benefits of treatment in patients who do not have a BMD T-score below -2.5.

Effects of intravenous pamidronate on renal function, bone mineral metabolism and bone mass in patients with severe osteoporosis

INTRODUCTION

To analyze the effects of intravenous pamidronate (APD) on bone remodelling, bone mineral density (BMD), fractures and bone mineral metabolism parameters, and the rate of adverse events, with special attention to renal function, in patients with osteoporosis with intolerance and/or any contraindication to oral bisphosphonates.

METHODS

We analyzed prospectively 17 osteoporotic patients (age, 66.8 +/- 9.4 years): 65% women, 82% with prevalent vertebral fractures. All patients received APD therapy (30 mg intravenously every 3 months) and were followed up for 1 year. We analyzed serum amino-terminal propeptide of type I procollagen and urinary N-terminal cross-linked telopeptide of type I collagen (as markers of bone turnover), serum calcium, phosphate, parathormone, 25OH-vitamin D, creatinine, and the creatinine clearance: at baseline, 1 week after starting APD treatment, and thereafter for every 3 months (before infusion) during 1 year. We also analyzed lumbar and femoral BMD at baseline and after 1 year, the incidence of new fractures, and the treatment-related adverse events.

RESULTS

One week after starting APD treatment, a significant decrease of N-terminal cross-linked telopeptide of type I collagen (32%) (P < 0.05) and an increase of parathormone values (72%) (P < 0.01) were observed, without significant differences found thereafter. No significant differences were observed in BMD evolution and in the other parameters analyzed throughout the study, nor in impairment of renal function. Sixty-four percent of patients suffered new skeletal fractures, 41% of patients showed flu-like syndrome after APD infusion, and 1 patient was withdrawn from treatment because of adverse events.

CONCLUSION

Patients with severe osteoporosis receiving APD infusions had a high rate of fractures without significant changes in bone mass or in bone markers; nevertheless, such a therapeutic regimen showed a good renal safety profile, suggesting that APD at this dosage is safe but ineffective for treating severe osteoporosis.

Effect of long-term treatment with risedronate on arterial compliance in osteoporotic patients with cardiovascular risk factors

Accumulating evidence suggests that osteoporosis and coronary artery disease have epidemiologic similarities. Moreover, the anti-atherogenic effects of bisphosphonates have been observed in vitro and in animal models. The present study investigated the effect of risedronate on indices of arterial compliance, serum osteoprotegerin (OPG) level, inflammatory and metabolic parameters in osteoporotic women with cardiovascular risk factors. In an open label, prospective study 68 postmenopausal osteoporotic women were evaluated for the study. Patients received risedronate orally in a dose of 35 mg per week, daily supplements of calcium and cholecalciferol during 6month treatment period. Patients were evaluated for lipid profile, HbA1C, insulin, C-peptide, fibrinogen, hs-CRP and plasma osreoprotegerin. Arterial elasticity was evaluated using pulse wave contour analysis (HDI CR 2000, Eagan, Minnesota). Large artery elasticity index (LAEI) increased from 9.86+/-3.66 to 11.54+/-">+/-3.16 ml/mm HgX10 (p<0.0001) during treatment period. Small artery elasticity index (SAEI) increased from 2.64+/-1.10 to 3.28+/-1.16 ml/mm HgX100 (p<0.0001). Systemic vascular resistance (SVR) decreased from 1876.12+/-457.72 to 1646.12+/-260.17 dyn/s/cm(- 5) (p<0.013). Metabolic parameters did not change during the treatment period. Plasma osteoprotegerin was significantly, positively correlated to SVR at baseline (r=0.36, p=0.045). At the final visit, OPG was marginally inversely associated with LAE (r=- 0.312, p=0.09), and significantly, positively associated with total vascular impedance (r=0.43, p=0.015). In conclusion, prolonged treatment with risedronate improved arterial elasticity of small and large arteries, and decreased SVR. These beneficial vascular effects were not related to changes in cardiovascular risk factors and may be attributed to direct effects of risedronate on the vascular wall.

Injectable bisphosphonates for the treatment of osteoporosis

Bisphosphonates are the current mainstay of the management of osteoporosis worldwide. Oral daily and weekly formulations have been linked to poor adherence, yielding a decrease in antifracture efficacy, in real-life settings. Development of new bisphosphonates, with increased antiosteoclastic potency and affinity for bone matrix allowed intravenous administration and intervals between dosings to be higher than weekly. Ibandronate and zoledronic acid have been investigated in established osteoporosis. Quarterly injections of ibandronate (3 mg) have been shown to be at least as effective in increasing bone mineral density and reducing bone turnover markers as the oral ibandronate regimen, which has proven antifracture efficacy. A once-yearly infusion of zoledronic acid (5 mg) during a 3-year period significantly reduced the risk of vertebral, hip and other fractures. Intravenous administration of bisphosphonates can now be considered as an important component of the management of postmenopausal osteoporosis.

Intermittent Bisphosphonate Therapy in Postmenopausal Osteoporosis

Bisphosphonates are the most widely prescribed drugs in osteoporosis today. They have unequivocally shown their ability to reduce fracture rate at the spine (alendronic acid, risedronic acid, ibandronic acid) and at the hip (alendronic acid and risedronic acid). However, their dosage and administration procedures and the adverse reactions induced by their oral intake are responsible for low adherence. Therefore, intermittent regimens have been developed. Weekly alendronic acid and risedronic acid provide similar benefits, in terms of bone mineral density (BMD) and changes in biochemical markers, as those seen with their daily formulations. Ibandronic acid has been shown to reduce vertebral fractures when given intermittently. Ibandronic acid given orally monthly and intravenously every 2 or 3 months provides increases in BMD similar to the daily formulation. Yearly intravenous infusions of zoledronic acid are currently being evaluated for their ability to reduce fractures. If the efficacy and safety of bisphosphonates given at administration intervals longer than weekly are confirmed, this might significantly improve patient adherence and long-term outcomes of bisphosphonate treatment in postmenopausal osteoporosis.

Postmenopausal osteoporosis. What have we learned since the introduction of bisphosphonates?

Over the past 12 years bisphosphonates have become a mainstay of treatment for postmenopausal osteoporosis. As a class, bisphosphonates significantly suppress bone turnover and increase BMD at the lumbar spine and other site through their direct inhibitory effects on osteoclasts. Alendronate and risedronate reduce the incidence of clinical vertebral and non-vertebral fractures. Etidronate and both oral and intravenous ibandronate reduce the incidence of clinical vertebral fractures, but data from primary analyses for reduction in non-vertebral fractures are currently less robust. Intravenous administration of zoledronate is under late-stage investigation for use in postmenopausal osteoporosis. Combinations of alendronate with estrogen or raloxifene provide a greater reduction in bone turnover markers and greater increases in BMD, but fracture risk reduction has not been determined. Overall, bisphosphonates are well tolerated. The most common side effects of oral bisphosphonates are upper gastrointestinal symptoms. Newer safety concerns about the use of bisphosphonates include osteonecrosis of the jaw and oversuppression of bone turnover. The optimal duration of bisphosphonate treatment has not been clearly established.

Comparison of intravenous pamidronate to standard therapy for osteoporosis: use in patients unable to take oral bisphosphonates

BACKGROUND

Bisphosphonates are potent therapies for osteoporosis, but some patients cannot tolerate oral forms. Our study sought to examine the effectiveness and safety of intravenous pamidronate as an alternate osteoporotic therapy in these patients.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study of 26 patients treated with intermittent, intravenous pamidronate (30 mg every 3 months) and 52 matched controls treated with standard therapy, all with osteoporosis. Primary outcome was response to therapy, defined as either stabilization or increase in bone mineral density. Secondary outcomes were patient safety and tolerability.

RESULTS

At an average of 16.1 months of follow up, 64% of pamidronate-treated patients responded to therapy at the lumbar spine, 65% at the femoral neck, and 63% at the trochanter. These response rates were not significantly different than those of the standard care group in which 69% were receiving oral bisphosphonates. Adverse events were uncommon and included mild, diffuse myalgias and flu-like symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

Intravenous pamidronate is a well-tolerated osteoporosis therapy that has an effect on bone density comparable to standard therapy in patients unable to take oral bisphosphonates.

Osteoporosis and skeletal fractures

Osteoporosis affects millions of individuals worldwide, rendering them susceptible to fragility fractures of the spine, hip, and wrist and leading to significant morbidity, mortality, and economic cost. Given the substantial impact of osteoporosis on both patients and the medical community, it is imperative that physicians improve awareness and knowledge of osteoporosis in the setting of low-energy fractures. In this review, we provide information on effective means of preventing fragility fractures and introduce clinicians to issues pertinent to the patient who suffers an osteoporotic fracture. Prevention of fragility fractures centers around adequate mineral nutrition, including daily calcium and vitamin D supplementation, as well as prescription antiresorptive medications such as bisphosphonates or teriparatide therapy in severe cases, both of which have been shown to decrease future fracture risk. Balance and strength training also play important roles in the management of the osteoporotic patient, particularly following a low-energy fracture, and external hip protectors may be useful for certain patients. Kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty are two minimally invasive techniques that show great promise in the treatment of vertebral compression fractures, although questions regarding long-term biomechanical effects still exist. Traditionally, osteoporosis has been underdiagnosed and undertreated following a low-energy fracture in an elderly patient. Although treatment rates may be improving through public health initiatives, the majority of patients with osteoporosis remain inadequately treated. Perioperative intervention programs that focus on patient education about osteoporosis and treatment options lead to significant increases in intervention and treatment. Reducing the risk of skeletal fractures in patients susceptible to osteoporosis involves improved physician education on the risk factors and management of osteoporosis, as well as informing patients on the significance of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry testing and medical treatment so that they may serve as their own healthcare advocates in this often-undertreated disease.

The effect of intravenous pamidronate versus oral alendronate on bone mineral density in patients with osteoporosis

Intravenous pamidronate is frequently used for the treatment of osteoporosis in patients who cannot tolerate oral bisphosphonates. The aim of the present study was to compare the changes in bone mineral density (BMD) after 1 year of treatment with either oral alendronate or intravenous pamidronate in patients with osteoporosis. We studied 40 consecutive patients starting treatment for osteoporosis: 20 received oral alendronate 10 mg/day and 20 received intravenous pamidronate 60 mg/3 months. Patients were started on intravenous pamidronate in the case of intolerance (within 1 month of start of treatment) of an oral bisphosphonate or in the case of contraindications for an oral bisphosphonate. BMD (spine and total hip) was measured with dual X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) at the start of treatment and after 1 year. The BMD of the lumbar spine increased by 4.0% (P<0.05 vs baseline) in both groups, and the BMD of the hip increased by 3.3% and 2.9% (P<0.05 vs baseline) in the alendronate and pamidronate groups, respectively. The increases in BMD of the vertebral spine and the total hip after 1 year are comparable in the alendronate and pamidronate groups. We conclude that intravenous pamidronate can be used successfully as an alternative treatment in patients with gastrointestinal intolerance of an oral bisphosphonate.

Bisfosfonatos intravenosos

Bisphosphonates possess a fundamental role in the treatment of bone metabolic diseases. Yet their main limitations are poor oral absorption and gastrointestinal side effects, mainly esophageal irritation. Indeed, oral administration is unpleasant for many patients, and it is difficult in bed-confined subjects. Therefore, intravenous administration of these agents can be very useful in several clinical scenarios, especially to improve the compliance. Recently, it has been showed that intravenous bisphosphonates are very useful to control hypercalcemia of malignancy, and to prevent bone complications related to metastases. Their use has also been analyzed in the prevention of bone disease after organ transplantation. Thus, their application to control Paget's disease of bone is well-known, and probably they could have an important role as antiresorptive agents in postmenopausal and steroidal osteoporosis. We present here a state of the art of the use of intravenous bisphosphonates for the aforementioned disorders.

Optimizing Administration of Bisphosphonates in Women with Postmenopausal Osteoporosis

Bisphosphonates have been approved in the US as oral medication for the treatment of osteoporosis for about 10 years. Efficacy data exists for fracture reduction for the commonly used oral bisphosphonates but not for intravenous formulations. Based on the mechanism of action that appears to allow for longer intervals between doses, it has been possible to extend the treatment choices from the original more demanding daily oral dose to an array of options including oral weekly and more recently monthly treatment (so-called cyclical therapy) and intravenous treatment with various administration regimens. The possibility of treatment with an annual (or less frequent) intravenous administration with zoledronic acid exists. Compliance, adverse effects, and efficacy vary with each administration regimen.

Pamidronate increases bone mineral density in women with postmenopausal or steroid-induced osteoporosis

INTRODUCTION

We aimed to determine the efficacy and safety of a cyclic intravenous therapy with pamidronate in patients with postmenopausal or glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis.

METHODS

We enrolled 86 Austrian female patients with postmenopausal (n = 69, mean age 68.13 +/- 1.14) or glucocorticoid-induced (n = 17, mean age 66.89 +/- 2.03) osteoporosis defined as a T-score of < -2.5 for bone mineral density (BMD) of the lumbar spine L1-L4. Patients received a single intravenous dose of 30 mg pamidronate at 3 months intervals. The per cent change in BMD was primary, whereas the safety and the biological response were secondary endpoints.

RESULTS

Seventy-six female patients (88%) completed study. Sixty patients received pamidronate therapy for the treatment of late postmenopausal osteoporosis and 16 patients received the same treatment for glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis. At the end of the trial, lumbar spine (L1-L4) BMD increased significantly in patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis (P = 0.000067), whereas in patients with glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis no significant change was observed (P = 0.724). The increase in the Ward's triangle BMD did not reach significance level in postmenopausal women receiving pamidronate (P = 0.0740). However, pamidronate treatment for glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis resulted in a significant increase in Ward's triangle BMD (P = 0.0029). The efficacy of pamidronate treatment for postmenopausal osteoporosis was also reflected in a decrease in circulating biochemical markers for bone formation, including alkaline phosphatase and osteocalcin. In addition, pamidronate was well tolerated with no incidence of severe gastrointestinal events.

CONCLUSION

Cyclic intravenous administration of pamidronate is well-tolerated therapy in postmenopausal osteoporosis, and increases spinal BMD. Randomized controlled studies with adequate number of patients are needed to test the efficacy of the compound in the treatment of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis.

An update on bisphosphonates

Over the past 15 years, bisphosphonates have been demonstrated as effective therapy for the treatment of osteoporosis based on their ability to suppress bone turnover resulting in increased bone mineral content and increased bone strength. The mechanism of action at the cellular level has been identified, and the more potent nitrogen-containing bisphosphonates clearly have reduced the risk of vertebral and nonvertebral fractures in patients with osteoporosis. Future use of these therapies is evolving to less frequent administration, and the interaction with anabolic therapies is presently being defined. Data to date support long-term safety with bisphosphonates in small numbers of patients treated for 5 to 10 years, and continued vigilant follow-up of the post-marketing experience will be necessary to determine if sustained bone turnover suppression is associated with rare musculoskeletal adverse events. Further development of bisphosphonates as adjunctive therapy to reduce bone metastases is in progress, and trials evaluating bisphosphonates as a structure modifying agent in osteoarthritis are nearing completion.

Intravenous pamidronate in the treatment and prevention of osteoporosis

BACKGROUND

Potent oral bisphosphonates are the mainstay of therapy for osteoporosis. However, there are patients who cannot have oral bisphosphonates (e.g. because of gastrointestinal side-effects). Therefore, we wanted to examine the effects of intermittent i.v. pamidronate (APD) on bone mineral density (BMD) in patients who needed bisphosphonate therapy but could not have oral bisphosphonates.

AIM

To assess BMD before and after intermittent i.v. APD in patients requiring a bisphosphonate either for the prevention of osteoporosis on concurrent steroid therapy or for the treatment of osteoporosis.

METHODS

This was a retrospective audit of 84 consecutive patients at risk of fractures commencing APD between October 1997 and May 2000. Patients were treated with intermittent i.v. APD. BMD as measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry before and after APD was the main outcome.

RESULTS

The mean length of treatment and mean total APD dose were 16.8 +/- 7.0 months and 186.1 +/- 79.5 mg respectively. The reasons for using APD were failure to qualify for oral bisphosphonates on the pharmaceutical benefits scheme due to lack of documented minimal trauma fractures (58%), symptomatic gastro--oesophageal disease (20%), intolerance of oral bisphosphonates (18%) and lack of efficacy of calcitriol (4%). Mean baseline T-score at lumbar (L) 2-4 spine and femoral neck were -1.54 +/- 1.22 and - 2.87 +/- 1.19, respectively. From baseline to after APD treatment, there was a significant increase in L2-4 BMD (0.883 +/- 0.175 vs 0.912 +/- 0.176 g/cm(2), P < 0.001, mean increase +3.5%), in femoral neck BMD (0.667 +/- 0.137 vs 0.680 +/- 0.134 g/cm(2), P= 0.001, mean increase +2.1%) and in trochanteric BMD (0.549 +/- 0.129 vs 0.566 +/- 0.132 g/cm(2), P < 0.001, mean increase +3.1%). One-third of the patients were on oral glucocorticoids at the time of the present study and they had a similar increase in BMD compared to patients not on gluco-corticoids. Mild side-effects occurred in seven patients, none of whom discontinued treatment.

CONCLUSION

Intermittent APD increases BMD and may be a suitable alternative for patients who cannot have oral bisphosphonates.

Intravenous bisphosphonate therapy for osteoporosis: where do we stand?

The use of oral bisphosphonates, particularly members of the aminobisphosphonate subclass, is well established for the treatment of osteoporosis. In a number of clinical settings, intravenous administration appears to be advantageous. However, current dosing and efficacy data are limited while definitive, long-term trials with some of these agents are ongoing. In this article, we review the available information and discuss the use of these drugs on that basis.

The Emerging Role of Bisphosphonates in Prostate Cancer

Bisphosphonates are a class of therapeutic agents originally designed to treat loss of bone density. It has been shown that the primary mechanism of action is inhibition of osteoclastic activity. Accumulating data show that these drugs are useful in diseases with propensities toward osseous metastases. In particular, they are effective in diseases in which there is clear upregulation of osteoclastic or osteolytic activity such as breast cancer and multiple myeloma. Despite the fact that osseous metastases in prostate cancer manifest as osteosclerosis rather than osteolysis, studies now show that bisphosphonates are useful in the management of this disease. In particular, they have demonstrated an impact on osteoporosis associated with hormonal therapy, bone pain from metastases, and skeleton-related events from prostatic adenocarcinoma. This review briefly summarizes the available clinical data on the utilization of bisphosphonates in the disease of prostate cancer.

A randomized controlled trial of calcium with vitamin D, alone or in combination with intravenous pamidronate, for the treatment of low bone mineral density associated with Crohn's disease

BACKGROUND

Osteoporosis is a common complication of Crohn's disease.

AIM

To study the effect on the bone mineral density of a bisphosphonate (pamidronate) given intravenously, in combination with oral calcium and vitamin D supplements, compared with oral calcium and vitamin D supplements alone.

METHODS

Seventy-four patients with Crohn's disease and low bone mineral density at the lumbar spine and/or hip were randomized to receive either a daily dose of 500 mg of calcium with 400 IU of vitamin D alone or in combination with four three-monthly infusions of 30 mg of intravenous pamidronate over the course of 12 months. The main outcome measure was the change in bone mineral density at the lumbar spine and hip, measured by dual X-ray absorptiometry, at baseline and 12 months.

RESULTS

Both groups gained bone mineral density at the lumbar spine and hip after 12 months. There were significant (P < 0.05) changes in the pamidronate group, with gains of + 2.6%[95% confidence interval (CI), 1.4-3.0] at the spine and + 1.6% (95% CI, 0.6-2.5) at the hip, compared with gains of + 1.6% (95% CI, - 0.1-3.2) and + 0.9% (95% CI, - 0.4-2.1) at the spine and hip, respectively, in the group taking vitamin D and calcium supplements alone.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with Crohn's disease and low bone mineral density, intravenous pamidronate significantly increases the bone mineral density at the lumbar spine and hip.

Bisphosphonate treatment of osteoporosis

Bisphosphonates represent the agents of choice for most patients with osteoporosis. They are the best studied of all agents for the prevention of bone loss and reduction in fractures. They increase BMD, primarily at the lumbar spine, but also at the proximal femur. In patients who have established osteoporosis, bisphosphonates reduce the risk of vertebral fractures, and are the only agents in prospective trials to reduce the risk of hip fractures and other nonvertebral fractures. Bisphosphonates reduce the risk of fracture quickly. The risk of radiographic vertebral deformities is reduced after 1 year of treatment with risedronate [68]. The risk of clinical vertebral fractures is reduced after 1 year of treatment with alendronate [69] and just 6 months' treatment with risedronate [157]. The antifracture effect of risedronate has been shown to continue through 5 years of treatment [158]. Alendronate and risedronate are approved by the FDA for prevention of bone loss in recently menopausal women, for treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis, and for prevention (risedronate) and treatment (alendronate and risedronate) of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis. Alendronate is also approved for treatment of osteoporosis in men. Other bisphosphonates (etidronate for oral use, pamidronate and zoledronate for intravenous infusion) are also available and can be used off label for patients who cannot tolerate approved agents. Although bisphosphonates combined with estrogen or raloxifene produce greater gains in bone mass compared with single-agent treatment, the use of two antiresorptive agents in combination cannot be recommended because the benefit on fracture risk has not been demonstrated and because of increased cost and side effects.

Zoledronic acid: an advance in tumour bone disease therapy and a new hope for osteoporosis

The two main therapeutic applications of bisphosphonates are tumour bone disease and osteoporosis. They constitute the standard treatment for cancer hypercalcaemia, and placebo-controlled trials have shown that the prolonged administration of bisphosphonates, such as pamidronate or clodronate, can reduce the frequency of complications from tumour bone disease due to metastatic breast cancer or myeloma by a quarter to one-half. The results obtained with the intravenous route appear to be more impressive and more rapidly obtained than with oral compounds. Both agents can reduce the risk of vertebral, wrist and hip fractures by 30 - 50%, whereas other antiresorptive agents, such as raloxifene (Eli Lilly & Co.) or calcitonin (Unigene Laboratories Inc.), have only been demonstrated to reduce the incidence of vertebral fractures. The short infusion time (4 mg over 15 min) offers a convenient therapy and constitutes the most evident advantage of zoledronic acid, which will improve patients' quality of life. Zoledronic acid has the potential to change the treatment of osteoporosis dramatically.

Osteogenesis imperfecta types I, III, and IV: effect of pamidronate therapy on bone and mineral metabolism

Cyclical iv therapy with pamidronate improves the clinical course in children and adolescents with osteogenesis imperfecta (OI). In this study we evaluated the effect of this therapy on bone and mineral metabolism in 165 patients with OI types I, III, and IV (age, 2 wk to 17.9 yr; 86 girls and 79 boys). All patients received iv pamidronate infusions on 3 successive days, administered at age-dependent intervals of 2-4 months. During the 3 d of the first infusion cycle, serum concentrations of ionized calcium dropped by 0.14 +/- 0.008 mmol (mean +/- SE; P < 0.001), and serum PTH levels transiently almost doubled (P < 0.001). At the same time, urinary excretion of the bone resorption marker type I collagen N-telopeptide related to creatinine (uNTX/uCr) decreased by 61-73% (P < 0.001). Two to 4 months later, ionized calcium had returned to pretreatment levels, and uNTX/uCr remained 30-35% lower than at baseline (P < 0.001). During 4 yr of pamidronate therapy (n = 40 patients), ionized calcium levels remained stable, but PTH levels increased by about 30% (P < 0.01). uNTX/uCr, expressed as a percentage of the age- and sex-specific mean value in healthy children, decreased from 132 +/- 13% (mean +/- SE) at baseline to 49 +/- 3% after 4 yr of therapy (P < 0.001). In conclusion, serum calcium levels can decrease considerably during and after pamidronate infusions, requiring close monitoring especially at the first infusion cycle. In long-term therapy, bone turnover is suppressed to levels lower than those in healthy children. The consequences of chronically low bone turnover in children with OI are unknown at present.

Response to alendronate in osteoporotic women previously treated with pamidronate

INTRODUCTION

Different bisphosphonates have been shown to increase bone mineral density (BMD) and reduce the risk of fracture in osteoporotic patients. It is unclear how shifting from a treatment with one bisphosphonate to another will influence the evolution of BMD and bone turnover.

METHODS

In the present study, we followed BMD (DXA, Hologic QDR1000) of the lumbar spine (BMDL) and of the total hip (BMDH), bone alkaline phosphatase (Ostase, Hibritech), and urinary collagen cross links (pyridinoline, deoxypyridinoline, Biorad) in 39 patients treated with IV pamidronate (60 mg/3 months) since at least 2 years and who were shifted to oral alendronate (10 mg/day, n=18) or left to IV pamidronate (n=21) for 2 more years.

RESULTS

BMD increased similarly and significantly in both groups after 2 additional years of treatment as compared to baseline (P<0.05, sign test). BMDL: +3.8% in the alendronate group vs +4.1% in the pamidronate group; BMDH: +4.3% in alendronate group vs +3.6% in pamidronate group, There was no significant change in the biological parameters of bone turnover in any group.

CONCLUSION

The increase of BMD with both bisphosphonates in these previously treated patients was as expected after a 2 more years of treatment. Alendronate administration did not induce a larger gain in BMD as compared to cyclic pamidronate. Bone turnover was no longer affected by switching the bisphosphonate treatment.

Management of primary osteoporosis

Although there is a great need for better therapeutic approaches to the patient who presents with a fracture, osteoporotic fractures will remain a condition that is more amenable to prevention than treatment. Hormone replacement therapy (HRT) is still considered by many the mainstay for the prevention and the treatment of posrmenopausal osteoporosis. However, there are several controversies regarding HRT, especially the duration of treatment and the risks/benefits ratio. Recent studies have challenged the assumption that HRT conveys real long-term beneficial effects. Raloxifene or other "selective estrogen receptor modulators" (SERMs) should progressively replace HRT in elderly women. Bisphosphonates have demonstrated a clearcut efficacy in the treatment of osteoporosis. Alendronate and risedronate have been the most extensively studied bisphosphonates under randomized controlled trials conditions. Both agents can reduce the risk of vertebral and hip fractures by one-fourth to one-half. However, oral bisphosphonates are not without gastro-intestinal toxicity and strict adherence to constraining therapeutic schemes is mandatory. Intermittent treatments are already in use. Weekly alendronate is as efficient as daily therapy and improves treatment compliance. Newer more potent bisphosphonates, such as oral ibandronate or intravenous zoledronic acid, will allow much less frequent administration. The anti-fracture efficacy of yearly zoledronic acid infusions is thus currently tested. On the other hand, bone-forming agents, such as daily subcutaneous injections of teriparatide (rhPTH 1-34) offer exciting perspectives for the treatment of severe osteoporosis despite the complexity of such therapy.

Recovery of proximal tibia bone mineral density and strength, but not cancellous bone architecture, after long-term bisphosphonate or selective estrogen receptor modulator therapy in aged rats

Various bisphosphonates and the selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM) raloxifene are approved treatments of postmenopausal osteoporosis. They increase bone mineral density (BMD), decrease bone turnover, and reduce vertebral fracture incidence through different cellular mechanisms. We investigated the bone cellular activities, architecture, mineral content/density, and strength of ovariectomized (ovx) rats on a long-term bisphosphonate or SERM treatment, at doses of either agent correcting bone strength. Eleven weeks postovariectomy, 6-month-old rats were treated with the SERM MDL 103,323 or with the bisphosphonate pamidronate for 5 months. Doses of pamidronate and MDL 103,323 were selected from previous studies showing correction of the ovx-induced decrease of ultimate strength of proximal tibia. Ultimate and yield strengths, BMD, and histomorphometric parameters were all quantified at the same site, i.e., the proximal tibia metaphysis. Long-term pamidronate decreases bone turnover and bone formation activity, leading to trabecular thinning. MDL 103,323 decreases bone turnover to a lesser extent, and slightly protects trabecular architecture by uncoupling bone resorption and formation activities. The yield strength is corrected by pamidronate, but not by MDL 103,323 treatment. However, neither compound restores the ovariectomy-induced cancellous bone loss. Total tissue area and cortical thickness are unchanged with pamidronate or MDL 103,323 treatment, indicating that cortical bone mass, thickness, and cross-sectional area are not modified. The discrepancy between proximal tibia BMD and mechanical resistance to fracture modifications, on the one hand, and cancellous bone volume, on the other hand, could be due to changes in the degree of mineralization of bone matrix and/or of the intrinsic properties of the bone matrix.

Efficacy and tolerability of cyclical intravenous pamidronate in patients with low bone mass

Oral bisphosphonates are an established mode of therapy for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. However, many patients are unable to take them either because of poor tolerability or some established contraindications. This retrospective study describes our clinical experience with the efficacy and tolerability of cyclical intravenous pamidronate in patients with osteopenia or osteoporosis at the American University of Beirut Medical Center. Twenty patients received intravenous pamidronate, as a 30-mg infusion administered intravenously over 2 h every 3 mo. All patients were maintained on calcium and vitamin D supplementation: 1000 mg of calcium and 400-800 IU of vitamin D, respectively. Bone mineral densities of the spine and/or hip were measured at baseline and within an average of 14 mo of study entry while on cyclical pamidronate. Two-thirds of patients had a significant increase in bone mineral density either at the lumbar spine or hip. Five patients (25%) developed the expected acute-phase reaction symptoms. Pamidronate constitutes an attractive alternative therapy in patients who cannot tolerate oral bisphosphonates.

Treatment of osteoporosis with bisphosphonates

Bisphosphonates are safe and effective agents for treatment and prevention of osteoporosis. Alendronate and risedronate are the best studied of all agents for osteoporosis in terms of efficacy and safety. They increase bone mass. In patients who have established osteoporosis, they reduce the risk of vertebral fractures. They are the only agents shown in prospective trials to reduce the risk of hip fractures and other nonvertebral fractures. They are approved by the US FDA for prevention of bone loss in recently menopausal women, for treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis, and for management of glucocorticoid-induced bone loss. Other bisphosphonates (e.g., etidronate for oral use, pamidronate for intravenous infusion) are also available and can be used off-label for patients who cannot tolerate approved agents. Bisphosphonates combined with estrogen produce greater gains in bone mass compared with either agent used alone; whether there is a greater benefit of combination therapy on fracture risk is not clear. Combining a bisphosphonate with raloxifene or calcitonin is probably safe, although data on effectiveness are lacking.

Bisphosphonates in osteoporosis: recent clinical experience

Bisphosphonates are potent inhibitors of bone resorption that have come to play a prominent role in the prevention and treatment of various forms of osteoporosis and other metabolic bone disorders. Therapy in women with osteoporosis and at high fracture risk substantially reduces the incidence of vertebral and non-vertebral fractures. In younger postmenopausal women, bisphosphonates are attractive alternatives to oestrogen to prevent bone loss and the subsequent development of osteoporosis. Bisphosphonates have recently become the treatment of choice to prevent and treat the skeletal consequences of chronic corticosteroid therapy. When administered appropriately, these drugs are very well tolerated and have an excellent safety profile. The challenges now to clinicians are to identify the patients for whom bisphosphonate therapy is indicated and to devise dosing and monitoring strategies to enhance the long-term adherence to therapy required to realise the full benefits of these treatments.

Intermittent and continuous administration of the bisphosphonate ibandronate in ovariohysterectomized beagle dogs: effects on bone morphometry and mineral properties

Bisphosphonates have emerged as a valuable treatment for postmenopausal osteoporosis. Bisphosphonate treatment is usually accompanied by a 3-6% gain in bone mineral density (BMD) during the first year of treatment and by a decrease in bone turnover. Despite low bone turnover, BMD continues to increase slowly beyond the first year of treatment. There is evidence that bisphosphonates not only increase bone volume but also enhance secondary mineralization. The present study was conducted to address this issue and to compare the effects of continuous and intermittent bisphosphonate therapy on static and dynamic parameters of bone structure, formation, and resorption and on mineral properties of bone. Sixty dogs were ovariohysterectomized (OHX) and 10 animals were sham-operated (Sham). Four months after surgery, OHX dogs were divided in six groups (n = 10 each). They received for 1 year ibandronate daily (5 out of 7 days) at a dose of 0, 0.8, 1.2, 4.1, and 14 microg/kg/day or intermittently (65 microg/kg/day, 2 weeks on, 11 weeks off). Sham dogs received vehicle daily. At month 4, there was a significant decrease in bone volume in OHX animals (p < 0.05). Doses of ibandronate >/= 4.1 microg/kg/day stopped or completely reversed bone loss. Bone turnover (activation frequency) was significantly depressed in OHX dogs given ibandronate at the dose of 14 microg/kg/day. This was accompanied by significantly higher crystal size, a higher mineral-to-matrix ratio, and a more uniformly mineralized bone matrix than in control dogs. This finding lends support to the hypothesis that an increase in secondary mineralization plays a role in gain in BMD associated with bisphosphonate treatment. Moreover, intermittent and continuous therapies had a similar effect on bone volume. However, intermittent therapy was more sparing on bone turnover and bone mineral properties. Intermittent therapy could therefore represent an attractive alternative approach to continuous therapy.

Prescription attitudes among gynecologists towards two particular risk factors of osteoporosis: the patient's age and her bone mineral density

OBJECTIVE

The present report assesses, among Belgian gynecologists, the effect of age and bone mineral density on osteoporosis prescription strategy in postmenopausal women.

METHODS

Charts of postmenopausal women were summarized. We constructed cases by modifying some parameters. Ten years of age were added or subtracted to the real age of the patient. The bone mineral density (BMD) result was also modified (three levels: normal BMD, osteopenia, osteoporosis). A total of 612 cases were constructed. Twelve cases were sent out of these 612 files to every Belgian gynecologist (n = 1010). For each chart the gynecologists were asked whether they would treat the patient with HRT. They were also asked whether they would prescribe other therapies than HRT and if so, which ones.

RESULTS

The chance to have an osteoporosis prevention or treatment prescribed increased when BMD decreased (respectively 57.4% for normal BMD, 73.1% for osteopenia cases and 89.4% for osteoporosis cases; P < 0.001). HRT was the most frequently prescribed medication (67% of the cases), but its prescription rate does not reflect only osteoporosis prevention. Nevertheless, for similar cases with osteopenia, the HRT prescription rate increased by a factor 1.25 and for similar cases with osteoporosis, HRT prescription rate increased by a factor 1.39. Calcium was the 2nd most frequent prescribed regimen. It was prescribed in 17% of the cases. A 3.4-fold increase for osteopenia cases and 7.6-fold increase for osteoporosis cases was observed, compared to women with normal BMD. When calcium was prescribed, it was in association with HRT in 64% of the osteopenia cases and in 76% of osteoporosis cases. Other drugs were less often prescribed. For the "younger age group", that is, with a mean age of 55 years, a prescription rate of 82.9% for any osteoporosis regimen was reached, whereas in the age group that was 10 years older a 20% lower prescription rate was reached (62.6%, P < 0.001). This was mostly due to a decrease in HRT prescription.

CONCLUSIONS

Prescription of medication known to reduce osteoporosis occurred more often in cases with low BMD. In the older patients with osteoporosis, gynecologists prescribed HRT less frequently. This was not compensated by a higher prescription rate of other medication.

Treatment of osteoporosis with bisphosphonates

Several bisphosphonates are effective for preventing bone loss associated with estrogen deficiency, glucocorticoid treatment, and immobilization, and for at least partially reversing bone loss in patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis and steroid-induced osteoporosis. The most promising of these agents are etidronate, alendronate, risedronate, and ibandronate. These drugs should have an important role in the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis; however, more research is needed regarding optimal doses and regimens (continuous versus intermittent, oral versus parenteral), comparisons with other agents, and their use in combination with other agents.