The effect of handling techniques on electrostatic charge on spacer devices: A correlation with in vitro particle size analysis

Addressing the Need for Controls on Particle Bounce and Re-entrainment in the Cascade Impactor and for the Mitigation of Electrostatic Charge for Aerodynamic Particle Size Assessment of Orally Inhaled Products: an Assessment by the International Consortium on Regulation and Science (IPAC-RS)

Multi-stage cascade impactors (CI) are accepted for the determination of metrics of the drug mass aerodynamic particle size distributions (APSD) of aerosols emitted from orally inhaled products (OIPs). This is particularly important for products where the drug to excipient ratio or particle density may not be the same in each aerodynamic size fraction; examples of such products are carrier-containing dry powder inhalers (DPIs) and suspension pressurized metered-dose inhalers (pMDIs). CI measurements have been used as the "gold standard" for acceptance of alternative methods of APSD assessment, such as laser diffraction for nebulized solutions. Although these apparatus are labor-intensive, they are accepted in regulatory submissions and quality control assessments because the mass of active pharmaceutical ingredient(s) in the aerosol can be quantified by chemical assay and measured particle size is based on the aerodynamic diameter scale that is predictive of deposition in the respiratory tract. Two of the most important factors that modify the ideal operation of an impactor are "particle bounce," that is often accompanied by re-entrainment in the air flow passing the stage of interest, and electrostatic charge acquired by the particles during the preparation and aerosolization of the formulation when the inhaler is actuated. This article reviews how both factors can lead to biased APSD measurements, focusing on measurements involving pMDIs and DPIs, where these sources of error are most likely to be encountered. Recommendations are provided for the mitigation of both factors to assist the practitioner of these measurements.

Controller Inhalers: Overview of Devices, Instructions for Use, Errors, and Interventions to Improve Technique

Inadequate inhaler technique in persistent asthma is frequently reported. However, there is little consensus on inhaler checklists, and critical elements of technique are not uniformly described. In addition, inhaler error rates and risk factors for poor technique are variable across studies. This Clinical Commentary Review summarizes the literature on inhaler design, use, and interventions to improve technique. Our aim is to help clinicians identify patients with poor inhaler technique, recognize the most important errors, and correct technique using evidence-based interventions.

Spacer devices for inhaled therapy: why use them, and how?

We present an extensive review of the literature to date pertaining to the rationale for using a spacer/valved holding chamber (VHC) to deliver inhaled therapy from a pressurised, metered-dose inhaler, a discussion of how the properties of individual devices may vary according to their physical characteristics and materials of manufacture, the potential risks and benefits of ancillaries such as valves, and the evidence that they contribute tangibly to the delivery of therapy. We also reiterate practical recommendations for the correct usage and maintenance of spacers/VHCs, which we trust offer practical help and advice to patients and healthcare professionals alike.

A review of the in vitro and in vivo valved holding chamber (VHC) literature with a focus on the AeroChamber Plus Flow-Vu Anti-static VHC

Valved holding chambers (VHCs) reduce the need for inhalation-actuation coordination with pressurized metered dose inhalers (pMDIs), reduce oropharyngeal drug deposition and may improve lung deposition and clinical outcomes compared to pMDIs used alone. While VHCs are thus widely advocated for use in vulnerable patient groups within clinical and regulatory guidelines, there is less consensus as to whether the performance differences between different VHCs have clinical implications. This review evaluates the VHC literature, in particular the data pertaining to large- versus small-volume chambers, aerosol performance with a VHC adjunct versus a pMDI alone, charge dissipative/conducting versus non-conducting VHCs, and facemasks, to ascertain whether potentially meaningful differences between VHCs exist. Inconsistencies in the literature are examined and explained, and relationships between in vitro and in vivo data are discussed. A particular focus of this review is the AeroChamber Plus® Flow-Vu® Anti-static VHC, the most recent iteration of the AeroChamber VHC family.

Valved Holding Chambers and In Vitro Metered Dose Inhaler Performance: Effects of Flow Rate and Inhalation Delay

BACKGROUND

Multiple factors may influence the performance of a metered dose inhaler (MDI) when used with a valved holding chamber (VHC or "spacer").

METHODS

Andersen Cascade Impactor measurements were conducted for three MDI products and two different VHCs using a specially designed system that accommodated variable delay times between MDI actuation and introduction of the aerosol into the impactor, and allowed reduced flow through the VHC while the impactor was operated at 28.3 L/min. Deposited drug mass and aerodynamic particle size distribution were determined using validated high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) methods. A two-level, three-factor full-factorial design of experiments (DOE) design was applied to assess the influences of VHC type, flow rate, and inhalation delay on a total of seven performance characteristics for each MDI product. An experiment without a VHC was added to assess the influence of VHC presence.

RESULTS

DOE study shows the presence and type of VHC are the major influences on emitted dose and respirable fraction. Following the VHC effect, the inhalation delay has the most significant influence on most MDI performance metrics-emitted dose, respirable particle dose and fraction (aerosols between 1.1 and 4.7 μm), and fine particle dose and fraction (aerosols under 4.7 μm).

CONCLUSION

This study illustrates the use of DOE analysis to effectively assess the effects of patient handling parameters (flow rate and inhalation delay) on the performance of MDI drugs when used with a VHC. The results of this study will inform Food and Drug Administration reviewers, the pharmaceutical industry, and healthcare practitioners as to safe and effective use of MDI products when used in conjunction with spacer devices.

Inhaler technique: facts and fantasies. A view from the Aerosol Drug Management Improvement Team (ADMIT)

Health professionals tasked with advising patients with asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) how to use inhaler devices properly and what to do about unwanted effects will be aware of a variety of commonly held precepts. The evidence for many of these is, however, lacking or old and therefore in need of re-examination. Few would disagree that facilitating and encouraging regular and proper use of inhaler devices for the treatment of asthma and COPD is critical for successful outcomes. It seems logical that the abandonment of unnecessary or ill-founded practices forms an integral part of this process: the use of inhalers is bewildering enough, particularly with regular introduction of new drugs, devices and ancillary equipment, without unnecessary and pointless adages. We review the evidence, or lack thereof, underlying ten items of inhaler ‘lore’ commonly passed on by health professionals to each other and thence to patients. The exercise is intended as a pragmatic, evidence-informed review by a group of clinicians with appropriate experience. It is not intended to be an exhaustive review of the literature; rather, we aim to stimulate debate, and to encourage researchers to challenge some of these ideas and to provide new, updated evidence on which to base relevant, meaningful advice in the future. The discussion on each item is followed by a formal, expert opinion by members of the ADMIT Working Group.

Pediatric in vitro and in silico models of deposition via oral and nasal inhalation

Respiratory tract deposition models provide a useful method for optimizing the design and administration of inhaled pharmaceutical aerosols, and can be useful for estimating exposure risks to inhaled particulate matter. As aerosol must first pass through the extrathoracic region prior to reaching the lungs, deposition in this region plays an important role in both cases. Compared to adults, much less extrathoracic deposition data are available with pediatric subjects. Recently, progress in magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography scans to develop pediatric extrathoracic airway replicas has facilitated addressing this issue. Indeed, the use of realistic replicas for benchtop inhaler testing is now relatively common during the development and in vitro evaluation of pediatric respiratory drug delivery devices. Recently, in vitro empirical modeling studies using a moderate number of these realistic replicas have related airway geometry, particle size, fluid properties, and flow rate to extrathoracic deposition. Idealized geometries provide a standardized platform for inhaler testing and exposure risk assessment and have been designed to mimic average in vitro deposition in infants and children by replicating representative average geometrical dimensions. In silico mathematical models have used morphometric data and aerosol physics to illustrate the relative importance of different deposition mechanisms on respiratory tract deposition. Computational fluid dynamics simulations allow for the quantification of local deposition patterns and an in-depth examination of aerosol behavior in the respiratory tract. Recent studies have used both in vitro and in silico deposition measurements in realistic pediatric airway geometries to some success. This article reviews the current understanding of pediatric in vitro and in silico deposition modeling via oral and nasal inhalation.

Electrostatics in pharmaceutical aerosols for inhalation

Electrostatics continues to play an important role in pharmaceutical aerosols for inhalation. Despite its ubiquitous nature, the charging process is complex and not well understood. Nonetheless, significant advances in the past few years continue to improve understanding and lead to better control of electrostatics. The purpose of this critical review is to present an overview of the literature, with an emphasis on how electrostatic charge can be useful in improving pulmonary drug delivery.

Electrostatics of pharmaceutical inhalation aerosols

Objectives

This review focuses on the key findings and developments in the rapidly expanding research area of pharmaceutical aerosol electrostatics.

Key findings

Data from limited in-vivo and computational studies suggest that charges may potentially affect particle deposition in the airways. Charging occurs naturally in the absence of electric fields through triboelectrification, that is contact or friction for solids and flowing or spraying for liquids. Thus, particles and droplets emitted from pulmonary drug delivery devices (dry powder inhalers, metered dose inhalers with or without spacers, and nebulisers) are inherently charged. Apparatus with various operation principles have been employed in the measurement of pharmaceutical charges. Aerosol charges are dependent on many physicochemical parameters, such as formulation composition, device construction, relative humidity and solid-state properties. In some devices, electrification has been purposefully applied to facilitate powder dispersion and liquid atomisation.

Summary

Currently, there are no regulatory requirements on characterising electrostatic properties of inhalation aerosols. As research in this area progresses, the new knowledge gained may become valuable for the development and regulation of inhalation aerosol products.

Targeting drugs to the airways: The role of spacer devices

AIM

Spacer devices are inhalation aids of varying dimension and complexity, specifically designed to overcome problems with the use of pressurised metered dose inhalers (pMDIs). The aim of this review is to examine the current understanding about these inhalation devices and discuss their advantages and disadvantages.

METHODS

The pertinent literature concerning the characteristics and effects of spacers on delivery and lung deposition of inhaled medications, as well as their clinical efficacy in patients with reversible airway obstruction, is examined.

RESULTS

Spacers minimise problems of poor inhalation technique with pMDI, reduce oropharyngeal deposition and increase lung deposition. Spacers improve the clinical effect of inhaled medications, especially in patients unable to use a pMDI properly. Compared to both pMDIs and dry-powder inhalers, spacers may increase the response to beta-adrenergic bronchodilators, even in patients with correct inhalation technique. A pMDI plus spacer has proven to be viable lower cost alternative to the use of a nebuliser for delivering large bronchodilator doses in patients with severe acute asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The use of large-volume spacers is recommended for delivering high doses of inhaled corticosteroids, and may permit a lower maintenance dose to be used.

CONCLUSION

pMDIs may be routinely fitted with a spacer, especially in situations where correct pMDI use is unlikely.

The local side effects of inhaled corticosteroids: current understanding and review of the literature

The frequent use of inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs), especially at higher doses, has been accompanied by concern about both systemic and local side effects. The systemic complications of ICSs have been extensively studied and are well-documented in the literature. There are comparatively few studies reporting on the local complications of ICSs. Compared with systemic side effects, the local side effects of ICSs are considered to constitute infrequent and minor problems. However, while not usually serious, these local side effects are of clinical importance. They may hamper compliance with therapy and the symptoms produced may mimic more sinister pathology. This review considers the prevalence of local side effects, their clinical features, the potential causes, the role of inhaler devices, and current measures that have been suggested to avoid the problem.

Spacer devices for metered dose inhalers

Spacer devices are attachments to the mouthpieces of pressurised metered dose inhalers (pMDIs), and range from tube spacers with a volume of <50 mL to holding chambers with a volume of 750 mL. Compared with a pMDI alone, spacers minimise coordination difficulties, reduce oropharyngeal deposition and often increase lung deposition. Spacers may not improve the clinical effect in patients able to use a pMDI properly, but may allow maintenance dosages of bronchodilators and corticosteroids to be reduced. Correct use of spacer devices is important, especially achieving control over electrostatic charge accumulation on the walls of plastic devices. In patients with severe acute asthma or severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, a pMDI plus large volume spacer may be a viable alternative to a nebuliser for delivering large bronchodilator doses. Although the addition of a spacer to every pMDI would not be justified, the use of large volume spacers has been recommended for any inhaled asthma drug in young children, and as a means of reducing systemic bioavailability of inhaled corticosteroids in adults and children alike.

The influence of formulation and spacer device on the in vitro performance of solution chlorofluorocarbon-free propellant-driven metered dose inhalers

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the hypothesis that spacer devices have limited effect on the in vitro fine particle dose emitted from solution metered dose inhalers containing different proportions of HFA134a [1,1,1,2,-tetrafluoroethane] propellant. Two solution formulations (80% and 97.5% wt/wt HFA134a) were tested across the actuator alone, actuator plus Aerochamber, and Ace holding chamber. Particle size distributions were determined using laser diffraction (LD) and cascade impaction (CI). Multimodal particle size distributions were identified using LD. CI analyses were characterized by a major mode located at approximately 0.5 microm. The fine particle dose emitted from the inhaler spacer combinations containing 97.5% HFA134a was independent of the device setup used. Fine particle doses were influenced by spacer setup in 80% HFA134a formulations, indicating different plume dynamics of low vapor pressure formulations. Sampling inlet deposition was approximately 0 when spacer devices were used with either formulation. When spacers were not used, sampling inlet deposition was increased significantly. However, inlet deposition with the 97.5% HFA134a formulation was significantly less than that of the 80% HFA134a formulation (approximately 25% of emitted dose compared with 69%, respectively). Thus, high propellant concentration formulations appear to have more robust in vitro performance. This is particularly important given the preponderance of poor patient compliance that is associated with spacer use. High propellant concentrations had the advantage of fine particle doses that were independent of the device setup and significantly lowered sampling inlet deposition when no spacer was used.

Electrostatic charge on spacer devices and salbutamol response in young children

Electrostatic charge on plastic spacer devices may affect the efficacy of inhaled drugs, but its consequences have never been evaluated in asthmatic children with airflow limitation. At the end of a positive metacholine challenge, 64 children (51.3+/-12.9 months, 32 boys, specific airway resistance (SRaw) 257.1+/-56.7% and forced expiratory volume in 1s (FEV(1)) 64.2+/-17.9% of the predicted value) inhaled one puff of hydrofluoroalkane-134a (HFA-134a) salbutamol (Ventoline((R))), and 15min later two other puffs (total dose of 300 microgram), delivered through either a new static Babyhaler((R)) (n=21), a detergent-coated, reduced static, Babyhaler((R)) (n=20), or a metal NES-Spacer((R)) (n=23) equipped with facemask. SRaw and FEV(1) were measured after each treatment and compared between groups by a Kruskal-Wallis test. The first 100 microgram salbutamol induced a 151.7+/-43.9% decrease in SRaw and a 19.9+/-10.6% increase in FEV(1). Additional 200 microgram salbutamol allowed a supplementary decrease of 35.1+/-25.7% in SRaw and increase of 12.1+/-11.8% in FEV(1), without significant difference between the spacer devices. Electrostatic charge on spacer devices does not affect bronchodilation with HFA-134a salbutamol in metacholine-challenged pre-school children. This could be in part explained by the use of supramaximal doses of salbutamol.

The influence of formulation variables on the performance of alternative propellant-driven metered dose inhalers

There are a multitude of formulation factors to consider when developing a pMDI. Evaluation of each of these variables has been performed over the years, but there has been an abundance of different approaches in the determination of the effects on device performance. Thus, although much is known about pMDI on the empirical level, a systematic approach has clearly been missing. With the ratification of the Montreal Protocol and the introduction of alternative propellant systems, the opportunity to establish relationships between different levels of testing, such as in vitro measurements and in vivo outcomes, and in vivo assessments and clinical outcomes, has arrived. This review outlines research efforts that have focused on the formulation of propellant-driven metered dose inhalers using alternative propellants. These formulation factors, including device characteristics, are reviewed with respect to the performance of MDIs.

Comparison of beclomethasone dipropionate delivery by easyhaler dry powder inhaler and pMDI plus large volume spacer

Dry powder inhalers (DPIs) provide a means of delivering inhaled asthma drugs without the use of propellants. Easyhaler is a multidose DPI, delivering 200 doses of beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP), 200 microg/dose. A gamma scintigraphic study has been carried out in 10 healthy volunteers to compare the deposition of BDP from Easyhaler with that from a pressurized metered dose inhaler (pMDI) coupled to a Volumatic spacer device delivering 250 microg BDP per dose. The spacer was used without any pretreatment to reduce static charge on the spacer walls. The study was conducted according to an open, randomized, crossover design. The volunteers inhaled the study drug using optimal inhalation technique for both devices. Lung deposition of 99mTc-labeled BDP averaged 18.9% (SD 9.5%) of the metered dose for Easyhaler, and 11.2% (SD 5.3%) for pMDI plus spacer (p < 0.05); when the data were expressed as mass of BDP deposited in the lungs, the difference in lung deposition just failed to reach statistical significance (Easyhaler 37.8 microg; pMDI plus spacer 28.0 microg). Oropharyngeal deposition was significantly reduced by use of the spacer. The results of this study show that Easyhaler delivers drug more efficiently to the lungs than pMDI plus Volumatic spacer when no measures are taken to eliminate static charge on the spacer walls.

A comparative analysis of the particle size output of beclomethasone diproprionate, salmeterol xinafoate and fluticasone propionate metered dose inhalers used with the Babyhaler, Volumatic and Aerochamber spacer devices

AIMS

To determine in vitro the effect of delay, inspiratory flow, and spacer washing on the drug output of metered dose inhalers (MDIs) used with different spacer devices.

METHODS

The amount of drug in particles <5 microm diameter from MDI+spacer, sampling after a delay of up to 20 s, was measured using a Multistage Liquid Impinger. Drug output was also measured at different flow rates, and after washing the Babyhaler in household detergent.

RESULTS

More fluticasone in small particles was recovered from the Babyhaler than the Volumatic or the Aerochamber spacers, and more beclomethasone and salmeterol was recovered from the Babyhaler and Volumatic spacers than from the Aerochamber. Washing the Babyhaler reduced the recovery of salmeterol, and did not alter the recovery of the other drugs tested.

CONCLUSIONS

Spacer devices need to be fully evaluated for each drug prescribed for them.

In vitro performance testing of three small volume-holding chambers under conditions that correspond with use by infants and small children

The in vitro behavior of three types of small volume-holding chambers intended for use by infants and small children (child AeroChamber, Vent-170 and Space Chamber) has been compared with two pMDI-delivered aerosol formulations (salbutamol: 100 micrograms unit dose and beclomethasone di-propionate (BDP): 50 micrograms unit dose) widely prescribed for this age group of patients. All devices were evaluated using a pediatric breathing simulator that created respiratory conditions likely to be encountered with infants and small children. The filter that collected aerosol delivered from the holding chamber on test was located at approximately the position that the patient's lips would be in the mask, by means of an annular support plate glued into the mask itself. At the lowest tidal volume (50 ml), no salbutamol or BDP was delivered by either the Vent-170 or Space Chamber, whereas the unit doses from the child AeroChamber were 39.7 +/- 1.6 micrograms and 11.8 +/- 1.2 micrograms, respectively. The Vent-170 and Space Chamber delivered measurable doses of both drugs when the tidal volume was increased to 100 ml and again to 200 ml, however, the corresponding doses available from the AeroChamber were always significantly greater. These findings emphasize the importance of designing in vitro tests that mimic use by the patient group for which the device is intended. In vitro measurements made at constant high flow rates in excess of 20 l/min do not reveal these differences in performance that are clinically significant, and may lead the physician to prescribe a device that under certain conditions may not deliver any drug to infants or small children.