Low-field versus high-field MR imaging of the knee: a comparison of signal behaviour and diagnostic performance

Role of low field MRI in detecting knee lesions

Objective: The aim of this work is to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of 0.3T sectoral MR imaging, compared with arthroscopy, for meniscal, cruciate ligaments and chondral knee lesions. Materials and Methods: We conducted a retrospective study analyzing all the consecutive knees subjected to arthroscopy at our institution between January 2014 and June 2017 and preceded within 3 months by knee MR examination at our institution with 0.3 T equipment. Patients with history of a new trauma in the time interval between MR exam and arthroscopy were excluded from the study. Two independent experienced radiologists evaluated in double blind the MR findings of menisci, cruciate ligaments and articular cartilage. Both radiological findings were independently compared with those of the arthroscopic report considered as gold standard. For each of the examined targets we calculated the following parameters: sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive and negative predictive value; interobserver concordance statistically calculated using Cohen’s Kappa test. Results: 214 knees (95R/119L) of 214 patients (143M/71F) aged from 18 to 72 years (mean 44) were included and analyzed. We found a good diagnostic accuracy of the low field MR in identifying the injuries of the menisci (93%) and the crossed ligaments (96%), but a lower accuracy for the articular cartilage (85%). Sensitivity resulted 90% for menisci, 73% for ligaments and 58% for cartilage. Specificity was 91% for menisci, 97% for ligaments and 92% for cartilage. Inter-observer concordance resulted to be excellent for cruciate ligaments (K of Cohen’s test = 0.832), good (K = 0.768) for menisci, modest to moderate for articular cartilage (K from 0.236 to 0.389) with worse concordance for tibial cartilage. Conclusions: Low-field MR sectoral device with dedicated joint equipment confirms its diagnostic reliability for the evaluation of meniscal and cruciate ligaments lesions but is weak in evaluating low grade chondral lesions. (www.actabiomedica.it)

Advances in High-Field MRI

MRI techniques and systems have evolved dramatically over recent years. These advances include higher field strengths, new techniques, faster gradients, improved coil technology, and more robust sequence protocols. This article reviews the most commonly used advanced MRI techniques, including diffusion-weighted imaging, magnetic resonance spectrography, diffusion tensor imaging, and cerebrospinal fluid flow tracking.

Comparison of High-field and Low-field Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Stifle Joint Disorders in Dogs

The most common cause of hindlimb lameness in dogs is cranial cruciate ligament rupture. In 48-77.3% of the population this trauma leads to secondary damage of the meniscus. Depending on the magnetic strength of the used device, different diagnostic accuracy can be achieved. The examination sensitivity of magnetic resonance imaging is affected by many factors which are independent of diagnostic strength, such as correct positioning of the patient, size of the stifle joint examined, or selection of the right protocol of sequences. Sensitivity of meniscus damage detection was 100% and 90%, respectively, in high- and low-field magnetic resonance. The best results were reported during examination of the stifle in dogs above 10 kg b.w. at a flexion angle of 145°, and in sagittal and dorsal planes. Regardless of the magnetic strength applied, imaging of the whole cranial cruciate ligament is difficult. Moreover, MRI allows the detection of the first signs of osteoarthritis, which were observed 4 and 6 weeks after rupture of the cranial cruciate ligament using high and low-field MRI. This also applies to lesions in the subchondral bone or a bone marrow which occurred in association with insufficiency of the stifle joint, and were mainly localized in the epiphysis of the femur and tibia. The present article provides a comparison of different examination protocols and images of damaged stifle structures, such as menisci, ligaments and bones of the stifle joint visualized with low-field and high-field magnetic resonance. Magnetic resonance arthrography is also discussed.

Analysis of Low-Field Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scanners for Evaluation of Knee Pathology Based on Arthroscopy

Background:

In recent years, few studies have evaluated low-field magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) diagnoses compared with intraoperative findings of the knee.

Purpose:

To determine the accuracy and sensitivity of low-field MRI scanners in diagnosing pathology of the menisci, cruciate ligaments, and osteochondral surfaces.

Study Design:

Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 2.

Methods:

MRI examinations without intra-articular contrast were performed on 379 patients for knee pathologies over a 4-year period. The MRI examinations were done using a 0.2-tesla scanner utilizing a dedicated knee coil and read by 1 of 3 board-certified, musculoskeletal fellowship–trained radiologists. Within a mean time of 50 days after MRI, all patients underwent knee arthroscopy performed by 1 of 2 sports fellowship–trained orthopaedic surgeons. Operative notes from the knee arthroscopies were then reviewed by a single independent observer, and the intraoperative findings were compared with the MRI reports.

Results:

For medial meniscus tears, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 83%, 81%, 89%, and 71%, respectively. For lateral meniscus tears, the values were 51%, 93%, 84%, and 73%, respectively. For anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears, the values were 85%, 94%, 69%, and 97%, respectively. For osteochondral lesions, the values were 8%, 99%, 29%, and 94%, respectively. For posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) tears, the specificity and negative predictive value were 99% and 100%, respectively.

Conclusion:

Low-field MRI was an accurate tool for evaluation of medial meniscus and ACL tears. However, within the study population, it is not as effective in diagnosing lateral meniscus tears and showed a poor ability to detect osteochondral lesions. More information is needed to properly assess its ability to diagnose PCL tears.

Zygomatic salivary gland diseases in the dog: three cases diagnosed by MRI

This article describes three original cases of zygomatic gland disease in the dog diagnosed by low-field MRI and treated by a modified lateral orbitotomy with zygomatic osteotomy. Presenting complaints included exophthalmia, protrusion of the third eyelid, and periorbital swelling without any history of trauma. Low-field MRI allowed for adequate diagnosis of zygomatic gland disease in all cases and provided detailed information about both the specific tissue characteristics of each lesion and extension into surrounding structures. MRI findings were also helpful for surgical planning and dictated the choice of a modified lateral orbitotomy without removal of the orbital ligament. Histopathologic diagnosis for each of the three dogs was a mucocele, a malignant mixed salivary tumor, and sialadenitis.

MR imaging of the elbow in the injured athlete

This article summarizes key MR imaging findings in common athletic elbow injuries including little leaguer's elbow, Panner disease, osteochondritis dissecans, olecranon stress fracture, occult fracture, degenerative osteophyte formation, flexor-pronator strain, ulnar collateral ligament tear, lateral ulnar collateral ligament and radial collateral ligament tear, lateral epicondylitis, medial epicondylitis, biceps tear, bicipitoradial bursitis, triceps tear, olecranon bursitis, ulnar neuropathy, posterior interosseous nerve syndrome, and radial tunnel syndrome. The article also summarizes important technical considerations in elbow MR imaging that enhance image quality and contribute to the radiologist's success.

Arthroscopic and low-field MRI (0.25 T) evaluation of meniscus and ligaments of painful knee

Objective:

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is an accurate, non-invasive, cost-effective technique for examination of the soft tissue and osseous structures of the knee. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of low-field MRI by comparing the results with subsequent arthroscopy.

Materials and Methods:

MR imaging study of 146 patients was done using 0.25 T ESTOATE G-SCAN and the sequence used were SE, FSE and GRE in all the three planes. The comparison was based on five parameters: accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value.

Result:

Our study showed high accuracy (98.08%) and negative predictive value (98.62%) for MRI in comparison with arthroscopy.

Conclusion:

Low-field MRI alleviates the need of arthroscopy for detection of meniscus tears and ligament tears.

High-resolution magnetic resonance imaging and conventional magnetic resonance imaging on a standard field-strength magnetic resonance system compared to arthroscopy in patients with suspected meniscal tears

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

We sought to evaluate the diagnostic performance of high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and conventional MRI of the knee on a standard-field-strength MRI system compared to arthroscopic findings in patients with suspected meniscal tears.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty-two patients (20 women, 22 men), referred from the department of trauma surgery, with suspected medial meniscal tears and planned arthroscopy of the knee joint were included in the study. MRI was performed on a 1.0-T MRI scanner with two different protocols: (1) conventional MRI using a circular, polarized knee coil (coil diameter: 17 cm) with a sagittal dual fast spin-echo sequence (repetition time [TR]: 2500 ms; echo time [TE]: first, shortest, second, 120 ms; turbo spin echo [TSE] factor: 12; field of view: 180 mm; matrix: 256 x 512; scan percentage: 100; slice thickness: 3 mm) or (2) high-resolution MRI with a surface dual-loop coil of the medial knee compartment (temporomandibular joint, coil diameter: 8 cm) with a sagittal dual fast spin-echo sequence (TR: 2400 ms; TE: first, shortest; second, 120 ms; TSE factor: 12; field of view: 120 mm; matrix: 512 x 512; slice thickness: 2 mm). The menisci were evaluated on the basis of an adapted score (0 = normal meniscus, 1 = intrameniscal, T2-weighted hyperintense signal, 2 = discontinuity of the surface, 3 = fragmentation). Lesions that received a score of 2 or 3 were graded as meniscal tears. The MRI results were compared to the arthroscopic reports, which represented the gold standard, and the sensitivity of both protocols in detecting a meniscal tear was determined.

RESULTS

Of the 42 patients included in the study, 25 (11 women and 14 men) underwent arthroscopy and all demonstrated a meniscal tear. A meniscal tear was correctly diagnosed in 76% of cases with conventional MRI and in 88% of cases with high-resolution MRI (P = .0087).

CONCLUSION

High-resolution MRI, using a surface dual-loop coil and specific sequences, which can be performed on every standard-field-strength MRI scanner, is able to significantly improve diagnostic performance for the detection of a meniscal tear of the knee joint.

Condromalácia de patela: comparação entre os achados em aparelhos de RM de alto e baixo campo magnético

OBJETIVO: Comparar os aparelhos de ressonância magnética de baixo campo e de alto campo para estudo da cartilagem articular da patela. MATERIAIS E MÉTODOS: Foi realizado estudo usando as seqüências GRE 2D, GRE 3D, FSE T2 e STIR (baixo campo) e TSE T2 SPIR. Cada seqüência foi analisada separadamente para o estudo da cartilagem, sem o conhecimento dos dados do paciente e do resultado das outras seqüências, sendo atribuído grau de lesão de 0 a 3 e descrita a sua localização. Os resultados de concordância e discordância foram analisados pelos testes de Kappa e McNemar. RESULTADOS: Na faceta medial houve baixas concordâncias e as discordâncias mostraram significativa superestimação. Na faceta lateral houve boas concordâncias e as discordâncias não foram significativas. No ápice houve boas concordâncias e as discordâncias mostraram significativa subestimação. CONCLUSÃO: A seqüência STIR teve a melhor concordância com a seqüência TSE T2 SPIR. Lesões de alto grau são mais bem caracterizadas pelas seqüências do aparelho de baixo campo. Áreas de aumento de sinal dificultam o estudo da cartilagem da faceta medial da patela no aparelho de baixo campo.

The optimal use of contrast agents at high field MRI

The intravenous administration of a standard dose of conventional gadolinium-based contrast agents produces higher contrast between the tumor and normal brain at 3.0 Tesla (T) than at 1.5 T, which allows reducing the dose to half of the standard one to produce similar contrast at 3.0 T compared to 1.5 T. The assessment of cumulative triple-dose 3.0 T images obtained the best results in the detection of brain metastases compared to other sequences. The contrast agent dose for dynamic susceptibility-weighted contrast-enhanced perfusion MR imaging at 3.0 T can be reduced to 0.1 mmol compared to 0.2 mmol at 1.5 T due to the increased susceptibility effects at higher magnetic field strengths. Contrast agent application makes susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI) at 3.0 T clinically attractive, with an increase in spatial resolution within the same scan time. Whereas a double dose of conventional gadolinium-based contrast agents was optimal in SWI with respect to sensitivity and image quality, a standard dose of gadobenate dimeglumine, which has a two-fold higher T1-relaxivity in blood, produced the same effect. For MR-arthrography, optimized concentrations of gadolinium-based contrast agents are similar at 3.0 and 1.5 T. In summary, high field MRI requires the optimization of the contrast agent dose in different clinical applications.

DEEP DIGITAL FLEXOR TENDONITIS IN THE EQUINE FOOT DIAGNOSED BY LOW-FIELD MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING IN THE STANDING PATIENT: 18 CASES

Injury to the distal aspects of the deep digital flexor tendon (DDFT) is an important cause of lameness in horses. The purpose of this study was to review the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings of 18 horses affected by DDFT injuries in the foot. The MRI was performed with the horses standing using an open low-field (0.21 T) MRI scanner. The results were compared with those previously reported for horses using high-field MRI. Eighteen of 84 horses (21%) with undiagnosed forefoot pain were found to have lesions affecting the DDFT. The history, clinical findings and results of radiography, diagnostic ultrasonography and nuclear scintigraphy of these horses were reviewed. The duration of lameness ranged from 1 to 12 months, and the severity varied from 1/10 to 6/10. Fifteen horses had unilateral lameness (right fore in nine, left fore in six), whereas three horses were bilaterally foreleg lame. Radiological changes, considered of equivocal significance, were found in six of 18 horses. Ultrasonographic changes involving the DDFT were identified in only one of nine horses. DDFT lesions were detected in both T1- and T2-weighted MRI sequences. Four different types of lesions were identified: core lesions, sagittal splits, dorsal border lesions, and insertional lesions. Combinations of different lesion types within the same horse were common. The types and locations of the DDFT lesions were similar to those previously reported using high-field MRI. The use of low-field standing MRI avoids the necessity for general anesthesia and access to conventional high-field MRI scanners. However, studies comparing the results of standing low-field MRI with high-field MRI (and other imaging procedures) are required before the sensitivity and specificity of the technique can be assessed.

High- Versus Low-Field MR Imaging

The role of MR imaging as a noninvasive technique in the detection and evaluation of musculoskeletal diseases is unquestionable. Most of the studies reported in the literature are based on high-field MR imaging. Initial studies performed with low-field-strength have reported unsatisfactory results in the assessment of the musculoskeletal system. Recent improvements, however, have generated a renewed interest in low-field-strength MR imaging. This article presents the principal applications and results published in the literature.

Comparison of flow artifacts between 2D-FLAIR and 3D-FLAIR sequences at 3 T

It has been reported that 3D-FLAIR can reduce the flow artifact resulting from cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) at 1.5 T compared to 2D-FLAIR. Flow-related artifacts tend to be worse at 3 T than at 1.5 T. The purpose of this study was to compare the CSF flow artifacts of 2D-FLAIR and 3D-FLAIR sequences at 3 T in eight healthy volunteers. The grade of CSF-related artifacts were scored through observing the perimedullary cistern, cerebellopontine angle cisterns, fourth ventricule, prepontine cistern, suprasellar cistern, ambient cisterns, sylvian fissures, third ventricle and lateral ventricles. Grading was performed on either axial or sagittal images. The CSF in-flow artifact scores were significantly higher on axial 2D-FLAIR than on axial 3D-FLAIR MPR images in all areas except the bilateral sylvian fissures, and higher on sagittal 2D-FLAIR than on sagittal 3D-FLAIR MPR images in perimedullary, bilateral CP angle and suprasellar cisterns. The CSF-related flow artifacts were significantly reduced by 3D-FLAIR, while structures in the cistern were depicted more clearly, even at 3 T. Further study is necessary to compare the clinical efficacy between 2D-FLAIR and 3D-FLAIR in depicting subtle abnormalities.

CT in the differentiation of pancreatic neoplasms--progress report

Today, computed tomography (CT) is the most commonly used imaging method in the assessment of pancreatic tumors. The sensitivity of CT in detection of pancreatic tumors is more than 90% when direct and indirect signs are used for diagnosis. However, the potential to differentiate exocrine (non-endocrine) tumors of the pancreas is limited. CT is used in these lesions to perform an adequate staging, especially for surgical purposes. The operative resectability, primarily in regard to vessels, lymph node metastasis and hepatic metastasis, has to be assessed. Keeping in mind the limitations of this macromorphological imaging procedure, CT has the best reproducibility and overall accuracy of all imaging methods. Using multislice CT it is possible to perform non-axial reconstructions with high resolution. In functional endocrine tumors, multislice spiral CT will enhance the diagnostic capabilities, since the whole organ can be examined in thin slices, with high resolution during the rather short arterial phase of the contrast medium. Since some endocrine tumors are hypovascular, a scan during the portovenous phase is recommended too. The diagnosis of benign pancreatic tumors, like serous cystadenoma and pancreatic lipomas, is addressed. The most important pseudotumors of the pancreas are discussed.

High-speed Imaging at 3 Tesla: A Technical and Clinical Review with an Emphasis on Whole-brain 3D Imaging

Improvements to the inherently high specific-absorption rate (SAR) of high-speed imaging at 3T are necessary in order to render this method clinically feasible. Various efforts have been undertaken to improve the associated hardware and software. In this review, we focus on whole-brain isotropic 3D imaging with a turbo spin-echo sequence with variable flip-angle echo trains (3D-TSE-VFL) and present its technical and clinical features. This sequence can be used to acquire images of various contrasts including T2-weighted, fat-suppressed T2-weighted, fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR), fat-suppressed FLAIR, and STIR (short tau inversion recovery). Various aspects of 3D-TSE-VFL are discussed, including CSF (cerebrospinal fluid) and metal artifacts, STIR contrast, small-part visualization other than brain, and the possibility of serial subtraction. Some images from clinical cases are presented.

Fat suppression gradient-echo magnetic resonance imaging of experimental articular cartilage lesions: comparison between phase-contrast method at 0.23T and chemical shift selective method at 1.5T

PURPOSE

To evaluate the diagnostic performance of a newly developed single-scan phase-contrast water-fat imaging technique for fat suppression at 0.23T open magnet, compared to the conventional chemical shift selective fat suppression method at 1.5T, in the detection of experimental articular cartilage lesions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sixty regions of 20 knee joint specimens of pigs with artificially created articular cartilage lesions were examined with 0.23T and 1.5T MR scanners. Sagittal fat-suppressed three-dimensional gradient-echo (3D GRE) images, obtained with the phase-contrast method at 0.23T, and fat-suppressed three-dimensional spoiled gradient recalled echo (3D SPGR) images, obtained with a chemical shift selective method at 1.5T, were evaluated. Diagnostic performance was analyzed. The conspicuity of the lesions, the amount of artifacts, and the uniformity of fat suppression were evaluated. The contrast-to-noise (CNR) values of cartilage-to-bone marrow, and cartilage-to-infrapatellar fat were calculated.

RESULTS

At 0.23T, sensitivity and specificity were 80% and 95% for partial cartilage lesions (grade 2), and 91% and 100% for full-thickness lesions (grade 3). At 1.5T, sensitivity and specificity were 85% and 95% for grade 2 lesions, and 96% and 97% for grade 3 lesions. No significant difference was detected in the conspicuity of lesions. The uniformity of fat suppression was more constant with 3D SPGR images compared to 3D GRE images. More susceptibility artifacts, derived from the procedure of creating lesions, were detected at 1.5T. The cartilage-to-fat CNRs were significantly higher with high-field images.

CONCLUSION

Phase-contrast method for fat suppression at 0.23T is a useful technique in detecting articular cartilage lesions.

Effectiveness of MR imaging in selection of patients for arthroscopy of the knee

PURPOSE

To determine the effectiveness of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in the appropriate identification of those patients with a high clinical suspicion of internal derangements of the knee who require arthroscopic therapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In a prospective multicenter study, MR imaging was performed at 0.5 T in 430 consecutive patients. The sensitivity and specificity of MR imaging in the patients who underwent arthroscopy and the corrected sensitivity and specificity of MR in all the study patients were calculated. For this correction, patients with negative MR and arthroscopic results were considered representative of the patients with negative MR results who were conservatively treated, and the number of the former was doubled. The standard errors of the corrected values were adjusted with the delta method.

RESULTS

At MR imaging, arthroscopy was indicated in 221 patients, 200 of whom underwent arthroscopy. Two hundred nine patients with negative MR imaging results were randomized for arthroscopic (105 patients) or for conservative treatment (104 patients). Of the 105 patients randomized for arthroscopy, 93 actually underwent arthroscopy. Arthroscopic treatment was necessary in 13 of 93 patients with a negative diagnosis at MR imaging. Arthroscopic treatment was necessary in 179 of 200 patients with a positive diagnosis at MR (sensitivity, 93.2%; specificity, 79.2%). Sensitivity and specificity corrected for randomization were 87.3% and 88.4%. Sensitivity and specificity corrected for randomization, respectively, were 84.1% and 94.2% for the diagnosis of medial meniscal tears and 69.5% and 94.5% for the diagnosis of lateral meniscal tears at MR.

CONCLUSION

MR imaging is an effective tool in the selection of patients for arthroscopy from among a general population.

In-office MR imaging

The development of new metal alloys, along with more innovative magnet technology, has permitted the construction of smaller magnets for magnetic resonance (MR) systems, which, in turn, has allowed development of MR imaging systems designed to be physically smaller than conventional whole-body MR imaging systems. These specialized devices are commonly referred to as "niche," "dedicated," or "extremity" MR imaging systems. Performing MR imaging procedures with this type of system offers distinct advantages that include reduced overall costs, more convenient installation and siting, and greater patient comfort and safety. Importantly, these critical features permit extremity MR imaging systems to be readily utilized in an "in-office" setting. This article will provide an overview of the technical aspects and clinical applications for extremity MR imaging systems, present patient management issues, and discuss the economic and practical considerations of the use of extremity MR imaging systems in an in-office environment.

Detection of articular cartilage lesions: experimental evaluation of low- and high-field-strength MR imaging at 0.18 and 1.0 T

The objective of this study was to compare the diagnostic performance of a dedicated orthopedic magnetic resonance (MR) imaging system (0.18 T) and a conventional MR imaging system (1.0 T) in the detection of articular cartilage lesions. Fifty knee joint specimens of pigs with artificially created articular cartilage lesions of different diameters, grades (2-3), and localizations, as well as 50 joints with intact articular cartilage, were imaged at 0. 18 and 1.0 T. Diagnostic performance was determined by means of receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis with three independent observers. For none of the pulse sequences used at 0.18 T or 1.0 T areas under ROC curves (A(z)) showed significant differences between the three observers. A(z) values from averaged data were as follows: a) 0.18 T: T1-weighted spin echo (SE): 0.70, proton-density-weighted SE: 0.59, T2-weighted SE: 0.61, two-dimensional (2D) gradient-echo (GRE): 0.73, 3D GRE: 0.75; and b) 1.0 T: T1-weighted SE: 0.73, fat-suppressed T2-weighted turbo-SE: 0. 79, 2D fast low-angle shot (FLASH): 0.79, fat-suppressed 3D FLASH: 0. 96, and water-excited 3D double-echo steady state (DESS): 0.96. With the use of 3D pulse sequences, the high-field system demonstrated a significantly better diagnostic performance than the low-field system in the detection of grades 2 and 3 articular cartilage lesions (P < 0.001).

MR imaging of the knee at 0.2 and 1.5 T: correlation with surgery

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to compare the diagnostic efficacy of low- and high-field-strength MR imagers in the diagnosis of anterior cruciate ligament tears and meniscus tears.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

In 219 patients with suspected internal derangement of the knee, MR imaging at 0.2 and 1.5 T was performed with similar sequences. Only patients with surgically confirmed diagnosis (n = 90) were included in the statistical analysis. Radiologists were unaware of diagnosis and field strength. Sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic accuracy, and inter- and intraobserver variability were determined.

RESULTS

There was excellent correlation between the field strengths in accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity for anterior cruciate ligament and meniscus tears. Accuracy for medial meniscus, lateral meniscus, and anterior cruciate ligament tears was 91-93%, 88-90%, and 93-96%, respectively, at 0.2 T and 91-94%, 91-93%, and 97-98%, respectively, at 1.5 T. Inter- and intraobserver variability values showed excellent correlation (kappa > 0.8).

CONCLUSION

The level of diagnostic accuracy in anterior cruciate ligament tears and meniscus tears is comparable for low- and high-field-strength MR imagers.

Effect of field strength on MR images: comparison of the same subject at 0.5, 1.0, and 1.5 T

To assess the effect of field strength on magnetic resonance (MR) images, the same healthy subject was imaged at three field strengths: 0.5, 1.0, and 1.5 T. Imaging was performed with three similarly equipped MR imagers of the same generation and from the same manufacturer. The same imaging sequences were used with identical parameters and without repetition time correction for field strength. Imaging was performed in four anatomic locations: the brain, lumbar spine, knee, and abdomen. Quantitative image analysis involved calculation of signal-to-noise ratio, contrast-to-noise ratio, and relative contrast; qualitative image analysis was performed by four readers blinded to field strength. The results of all of the examinations were considered to be of diagnostic value. In general, signal-to-noise ratio and contrast-to-noise ratio were lowest at 0.5 T and highest at 1.5 T; relative contrast was not related to field strength. At qualitative analysis, images obtained at 1.0 and 1.5 T were superior to images obtained at 0.5 T; qualitative differences were less important in locations where there is motion or high magnetic susceptibility differences between tissues (e.g., the spine and abdomen). However, excellent image quality was obtained with all three field strengths.

Results of a prospective multicenter study for evaluation of the diagnostic quality of an open whole-body low-field MRI unit. A comparison with high-field MRI measured by the applicable gold standard

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the diagnostic quality of an open whole-body low-field MRI scanner compared to high-field scanners.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Over a period of 3 months, 401 patients with diseases of the kidney (n = 78), the shoulder (n = 122), the spine (n = 105) and the cerebrum (n = 96) were prospectively evaluated in four participating centers. They all underwent clinical evaluation, low-field and high-field MRI examination and surgical or follow-up confirmation of diagnosis. Clinical, histopathologic, high-field and low-field MRI diagnoses were recorded in standardized questionnaires that were centrally evaluated. Statistical evaluation comprised two parts: ROC analysis assessed accuracy of MRI and clinical diagnoses; furthermore rates of concordance of high- and low-field MRI diagnosis were calculated.

RESULTS

We found no statistically relevant difference in high-field MRI diagnosis compared to low-field MRI diagnostic accuracy measured by clinical or surgical gold standard in three of the four regions examined; in cerebral examinations there was a small yet significant advantage for the high-field systems (P = 0.01).

CONCLUSION

We conclude that the open low-field scanner we evaluated using clinical and surgical gold standard as reference is able to achieve comparable diagnostic accuracy compared to high-field scanners at lower costs and greater patient comfort. Limitations due to field strength (signal-to-noise ratio, resolution, scan time) seem to be relevant only in a very small number of cases that warrant high-field examination.

MRI of the foot and ankle: diagnostic performance and patient acceptance of a dedicated low field MR scanner

The objective of this study was to compare image quality and patient acceptance of a dedicated .2-T MR system and a 1.0-T whole body system. Forty-one consecutive patients referred for MRI of the foot or ankle were prospectively examined with a dedicated .2-T low field system and a 1.0-T whole body system. Images were evaluated qualitatively by two observers and quantitatively using signal-difference-to-noise ratios. The patients were interviewed with respect to positioning, examination time, noise, claustrophobia, confidence in the diagnosis, and willingness to repeat the examination, using a questionnaire. The qualitative score was significantly higher for the 1.0-T system (2.6 vs 2.2 for reader 1 [P = .008] and 2.6 vs 1.7 for reader 2 [P < .0001]), respectively). The signal-difference-to-noise ratios were also superior for the 1.0-T MR system (2.96 vs .88, P < .0001). However, 96% of the lesions visualized at 1.0 T were also detected with the low field system. Patient acceptance was significantly better for the 1.0-T MR scanner (48.6 vs 43.9, P = .007). Image quality of the dedicated low field system was inferior to the 1.0-T system using objective parameters, and patients did not prefer the low field system. Although only 4% of lesions were missed in this series, the low field MR system can only be recommended when funding is limited and the available space is limited.

MRI preferable to diagnostic arthroscopy in knee joint injuries. A double-blind comparison of 47 patients

We compared the findings of low-field MRI of the knee with those of subsequent arthroscopy. In a double-blind set-up, 47 patients with knee joint injuries were enrolled. Two radiologists independently interpreted the MRI examinations and consensus was obtained in case of discrepancy. Arthroscopy was performed without knowledge of the MRI findings. The accuracy rates of MRI for evaluating the medial meniscus, lateral meniscus and anterior cruciate ligament were 77%, 91% and 96%, respectively, when arthroscopy was considered the "golden standard". When MRI was considered the standard, the figures for arthroscopy were 74%, 91% and 96%. MRI found the indication for treatment in 18 of 21 patients who were treated at the arthroscopy. In 17 patients, neither MRI nor arthroscopy detected any lesion. In the remaining 9 patients, MRI demonstrated a lesion, but no lesion was found at the subsequent arthroscopy. Our conclusion is that low-field MRI can be used as a first-line diagnostic examination in patients with suspected meniscus or cruciate ligament injuries and thus a substantial number of negative diagnostic arthroscopies can be avoided.