Postmyocardial infarction pain and infarct extension in the coronary care unit: role of two-dimensional echocardiography

Progressive changes in ventricular structure and function during the year after acute myocardial infarction

To investigate the long-term changes in left ventricular structure and function after myocardial infarction, 51 patients with a first myocardial infarction (17 anterior, 23 inferior, and 11 non-Q wave) were studied by two-dimensional echocardiography at the time of entry into the hospital, at 3 months, and 1 year after infarction. The left ventricular endocardial surface was reconstructed from these echocardiograms, and the endocardial surface area (ESA) index (in cm2/m2) and area of abnormal wall motion (AWM in cm2) were quantitated. Despite different trends in the ESA index between entry and 3-month values in those with and without early infarct expansion, a decrease in the ESA index from 3 months to 1 year was noted in anterior and non-Q wave infarctions (anterior with early expansion: 96.3 +/- 8.6 to 81.5 +/- 4.2 cm2/m2, p less than 0.05; anterior without early expansion: 59.7 +/- 2.0 to 54.7 +/- 2.0 cm2/m2, p less than 0.01; non-Q wave: 64.1 +/- 3.5 to 57.9 +/- 4.4 cm2/m2, p less than 0.01). The mean decline in ESA from 3 months to 1 year of 8.9 +/- 2.5 cm2 was independent of initial infarct size. Regional function, as represented by the area of AWM, was also improved but the timing of the improvement was related to the location and size of the infarction.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

The value and promise of echocardiography in acute myocardial infarction and coronary artery disease

Two-dimensional and Doppler echocardiography have become extremely useful in the management of patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Echocardiography is noninvasive, relatively inexpensive, and has no known biohazards. It offers unequaled information about cardiac anatomy and function. In the acute setting it is useful in the diagnosis of AMI and its complications. It is an excellent tool for monitoring therapy. Echocardiography has been shown to be useful in risk stratification upon presentation to the emergency ward and prior to hospital discharge. Stress echocardiography has broadened and sharpened the diagnostic and prognostic information. Contrast echocardiography has promise for demonstrating coronary artery flow. Research in ultrasonic myocardial tissue characterization shows potential for differentiating ischemic myocardium from infarcted myocardium. Thus, echocardiography is likely to become increasingly important in the future management of patients with AMI.

Giant breast hematoma requiring blood transfusion: an unusual complication after an echocardiographic study during thrombolytic therapy

We report on a patient in whom significant bleeding occurred during thrombolytic therapy. The bleeding occurred after an echocardiographic study, and it resulted in blood transfusion.

Natural history of left ventricular size and function after acute myocardial infarction. Assessment and prediction by echocardiographic endocardial surface mapping

To investigate the natural history of regional dyssynergy and left ventricular size after myocardial infarction, 57 patients with a first Q wave myocardial infarction (18 anterior, 35 inferior, and four apical by echocardiography) were studied by two-dimensional echocardiography and compared with 30 control patients. Measurements from the echocardiograms were used to construct maps of the left ventricular endocardial surface from which the endocardial surface area index (ESAi) and the percent of the endocardial surface area involved by abnormal wall motion (%AWM) were calculated. The maps from entry and 3-month echocardiograms were used to classify patients based on changes in ESAi and abnormal wall motion. Two subgroups of patients were identified at entry--those with a normal ESAi (group 1, n = 50) and those with an increased ESAi (group 2, n = 7). Group 1 patients was subdivided at 3 months by changes occurring in ESAi (1A, 5% increase [n = 19]; 1B, no change [n = 23]; 1C, 5% decrease [n = 8]). The increase in ESAi (64.9 +/- 5.2 to 75.4 +/- 7.5 cm2/m2, p less than 0.0001) in group 1A was associated with global ventricular dilatation (n = 11) and clinically silent infarct extension (n = 8). Groups 1B and 1C were composed predominantly of patients with inferior infarctions, and all exhibited either no change or a significant decrease in infarct size (infarct regression). Group 2 patients demonstrated a continued increase in ESAi by 3 months (88.2 +/- 10.0 to 101.4 +/- 15.5 cm2/m2, p less than 0.007). This group comprised only patients with anterior infarctions, and all exhibited infarct expansion at the left ventricular apex. The changes in left ventricular size and functional infarct size are heterogeneous after acute myocardial infarction and relate to the initial endocardial surface area, infarct location, and functional infarct size.

Safety and utility of transesophageal echocardiography in the critically ill patient

We studied the safety and utility of transesophageal echocardiography in the evaluation of critically ill patients in the intensive care unit setting. Sixty-two studies were performed in four different intensive care units on 61 patients with a mean age of 58 +/- 14 years (range 25 to 78 years). Indications for the study included suspected aortic pathologic conditions (18 patients), cardiac source of embolus (16 patients), postmyocardial infarction complications (6 patients), and suspected infective endocarditis (5 patients). Studies were performed at bedside with the use of small amounts of intravenous sedatives. The probe was passed successfully in 61 of 62 attempts. Diagnoses that were missed by surface echocardiography, including aortic dissection, left atrial thrombus, ruptured papillary muscle, and prosthetic valve vegetation were clearly identified by transesophageal echocardiography, which facilitated appropriate management in these cases. In cases in which no pathologic condition was identified, transesophageal echocardiography was useful in ruling out intracardiac shunt, in assessing left ventricular function, and in excluding significant valvular pathologic conditions. No serious complications were recorded, and the procedure was, in general, very well tolerated.