Lessons from the European Cooperative recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator (rt-PA) versus placebo trial

The recanalization after thrombolysis as surrogate for clinical outcomes in patients with ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction: A systematic review and meta-regression analysis of data from randomized controlled trials

AIMS

Thrombolytic therapy has been known to be effective in reducing clinical outcomes and increasing recanalization rate among patients with ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction (STEMI). However, whether post-thrombolysis recanalization could be used as a surrogate for clinical outcomes is unknown.

METHODS

We systematically searched PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library database to identify randomized controlled trials (RCT) that examined effects of thrombolytic agents in STEMI. Recanalization was defined as TIMI grade 2 or 3 flow. The primary outcome was in-hospital all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes included in-hospital and 30-day recurrent myocardial infarction (re-MI), composite of death and re-MI, major bleeding and all bleeding. Random-effects meta-regression was used for analysis.

RESULTS

We identified 111 eligible study arms and 52 eligible comparisons from 58 RCTs involving 16 536 patients. Our analyses showed that among study arms recanalization rate was significantly inversely associated with the incidence of in-hospital all-cause mortality (β: -0.07, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.13 to -0.02), re-MI (β: -0.09, 95%CI: -0.18 to -0.01) and the composite of death and re-MI (β: -0.17, 95%CI: -0.28 to -0.05), and positively associated with in-hospital all bleeding but not with major bleeding. Among paired comparisons, the difference in recanalization rate was associated with the corresponding difference in incidence of in-hospital all-cause mortality (β: -0.15, 95%CI: -0.28 to -0.01) but the relationship was not significant for any other outcome.

CONCLUSION

Pooled evidence from RCTs suggest the potential use of recanalization as a surrogate for clinical outcomes in evaluating the efficacy of thrombolysis among patients with STEMI.

Changes in blood viscosity with the recombinant tissue plasminogen activator alteplase

We measured whole blood viscosity to investigate the time course of the fibrinolytic activity of the recombinant tissue plasminogen activator alteplase. Changes in blood viscosity over time were determined using an oscillation-type viscometer at a shear rate of 400 to 500 per second. Blood viscosity initially increased with alteplase as in untreated blood, but then decreased, reflecting the fibrinolytic activity of generated plasmin. Blood viscosity subsequently stabilized at a level below the initial value owing to the dissolution of both fibrin and fibrinogen by alteplase. To our knowledge, the present study is the first to examine the time course of changes in BV during fibrin formation and degradation. The results indicated that the fibrinolyic agent alteplase might provide the additional benefit of increasing blood flow by lowering blood viscosity.

Ventricular function and cardiac hypertrophy after coronary thrombolysis with tissue-type plasminogen activator (t-PA) in dogs with coronary artery thrombi

Subacute prognosis of cardiac function after thrombolysis with a modified tissue-type plasminogen activator (t-PA) YM866 was determined in dogs with coronary artery thromboses induced by injection of a thrombin, fibrinogen and autogenous blood mixture. The left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) decreased 30 min after occlusion and had not improved 1 week later. Examination after sacrifice revealed myocardial infarction as well as increases in both the left ventricular myocardial area and heart mass. Occluded coronary arteries reperfused by YM866 (0.1 mg kg(-1) i.v.) treatment 30 min after occlusion, by contrast, had improved LVEF and inhibited myocardial infarction development. In addition, the left ventricular myocardial area and heart mass were significantly reduced compared with the vehicle control group 1 week after administration. Although occluded coronary arteries reperfused by YM866 (0.1 mg kg(-1) i.v.) treatment 3 h after occlusion did not show an improvement in the LVEF or inhibition of myocardial infarction development, the left ventricular myocardial area and heart mass decreased significantly compared with the vehicle control group 1 week after administration. In conclusion, early reperfusion by t-PA treatment 30 min after occlusion improved the ventricular function and cardiac hypertrophy, whereas late reperfusion by t-PA treatment 3 h after occlusion did not improve the ventricular function but did inhibit hypertrophy in dogs with coronary artery thrombi.

YM866, a novel modified tissue-type plasminogen activator, affects left ventricular function and myocardial infarct development in dogs with coronary artery thrombi

YM866 is a novel modified tissue-type plasminogen activator (t-PA). Its effects on left ventricular function and myocardial infarct development in dogs with copper coil-induced coronary artery thrombosis were compared with those of a native t-PA, alteplase. YM866 (bolus injection) and alteplase (bolus plus infusion) were administered 15 min after coronary artery occlusion. YM866 and alteplase produced reperfusion in all animals, with a median time to reperfusion of 10 min. In contrast, no reperfusion occurred in the vehicle control group. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) significantly decreased 15 min after coronary occlusion. YM866 and alteplase improved LVEF 3 hr and 4 hr after administration, respectively, while LVEF did not improve in the vehicle control group. Only slight myocardial infarct areas were observed in both YM866- and alteplase-administered groups, while the area in the vehicle control group accounted for 18.2% of left ventricular myocardial area. In conclusion, although both YM866 and alteplase reperfused occluded coronary arteries, inhibited myocardial infarct development and improved LVEF in dogs with coronary artery thrombi, only a single bolus injection of YM866 was necessary to achieve these improvements. Therefore, YM866 shows promise as an improved clinical agent in treating acute myocardial infarction.

Determinants of left ventricular function two weeks and one year after an acute myocardial infarction

This study examines possible covariates of left ventricular function two weeks and sixteen months after an acute infarction. It was performed in a group of 312 patients randomized double blindly to recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA) (n = 156) or placebo treatment and followed thereafter for at least one year. Two weeks after the infarction, enzymatic infarct size, infarct-related vessel, and number of diseased coronary arteries were significant determinants of the infarct-related regional wall motion (centerline method) (R2 = 0.25 to 0.60, P = 0.0001). Enzymatic infarct size, regional wall motion of both infarct-related and remote areas, reinfarction, and treatment allocation were significant independent correlates of ejection fraction (R2 = 0.76), end-diastolic volume (R2 = 0.20), and end-systolic volume (R2 = 0.69, P < 0.0001). Infarct-related coronary artery and predischarge end-systolic volume were significant independent covariates of ejection fraction at rest (R2 = 0.47) after sixteen months. Age, enzymatic infarct size, and predischarge end-diastolic volume were independent determinants of the maximal (R2 = 0.49, P < 0.0001) and peak exercise ejection fraction (R2 = 0.49, P < 0.0001).

Effect on outcome of the presence or absence of chest pain at initiation of recombinant tissue plasminogen activator therapy in acute myocardial infarction. The Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction Investigators

To ascertain whether the outcome of patients with suspected myocardial infarction differs when chest pain is still present at initiation of thrombolytic therapy, participants in the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction Phase II study, all of whom presented within 4 hours of symptoms onset, were retrospectively divided into 2 groups: (1) those with chest pain present at onset of intravenous thrombolysis, n = 3,000; and (2) those who were free of chest pain on beginning intravenous thrombolytic therapy, n = 337. Patients free of chest pain were older (58 vs 57 years, p = 0.01), more often women (23 vs 17%, p = 0.01), had fewer electrocardiographic leads with ST elevation (3.8 vs 4.1, p < 0.001), and the presenting event was confirmed less often as myocardial infarction than as chest pain without infarction (88 vs 96%, p < 0.001). There were no significant differences between the 2 groups for in-hospital death, reinfarction, recurrent ischemic events, stroke, overall hemorrhagic complications, coronary angioplasty or bypass surgery. At 6-weeks follow-up, more pain-free patients had resting ejection fraction > 0.55 (35 vs 31%, p = 0.001) and fewer developed congestive heart failure (12 vs 20%). At 1-year follow-up, fewer pain-free patients developed congestive heart failure (15 vs 21%, p = 0.009), but no differences existed between the 2 groups in frequency of death, reinfarction, coronary angioplasty, bypass surgery or anginal class. Thus, there are several observations in patients who were free of chest pain at onset of lytic therapy. (1) The majority developed enzymatic or electrocardiographic evidence of acute myocardial infarction.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Prehospital thrombolysis: beneficial effects of very early treatment on infarct size and left ventricular function

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of very early (< or = 1.5 h after symptom onset) and later (> 1.5 up to 4 h) thrombolytic therapy on infarct size, left ventricular function and early mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction. To start thrombolysis at the earliest possible moment, it was performed in the prehospital setting. A cutoff time of 1.5 h was prospectively stipulated.

BACKGROUND

Shortening of ischemic time is crucial within the 1st 2 h. Prehospital thrombolysis can reduce time to treatment and enables very early initiation of therapy for many patients.

METHODS

One hundred seventy patients received 30 mg of anistreplase up to 4 h from symptom onset by a mobile intensive care unit physician. Infarct size was measured from cumulative release of alpha-hydroxybutyrate dehydrogenase, and left ventricular function was assessed by contrast angiograms 10 days after the infarction.

RESULTS

The decision to treat on scene was correct in 98% of patients. There were no bleeding complications or deaths outside the hospital setting. In 28 patients (17%) the ischemic process was interrupted. Findings with thrombolytic therapy initiated < or = 1.5 (96 patients) versus > 1.5 h (74 patients) were the following: initial extent of epicardial injury, 1.6 +/- 0.9 versus 1.4 +/- 0.7 mV, p = NS; infarct size by cardiac enzyme release 646 +/- 634 versus 886 +/- 712 IU/liter, p < 0.05; ejection fraction 57 +/- 14% versus 51 +/- 13%, p < 0.05; regional dyssynergic area 24 +/- 22 versus 33 +/- 24 U, p < 0.05; 21-day mortality 1 of 96 versus 5 of 74 patients (1% vs. 7%, p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The data suggest that in evolving myocardial infarction up to 4 h in duration, the start of thrombolytic therapy at < or = 1.5 h compared with > 1.5 h limits infarct size, preserves left ventricular function and may save lives.

Combined thromboxane A2 synthase inhibition and prostaglandin endoperoxide receptor antagonism limits myocardial infarct size after mechanical coronary occlusion and reperfusion at doses enhancing coronary thrombolysis by streptokinase

OBJECTIVES

We sought to examine to what extent a combination of strong thromboxane A2 synthase inhibition and moderate endoperoxide receptor blockade enhances streptokinase-induced coronary thrombolysis and provides anti-ischemic activity independent from its thrombolytic activity.

METHODS

Coronary thrombi, induced by crush injury and stenosis of the coronary artery, were lysed with streptokinase, 10,000 IU/kg body weight over 90 min, in anesthetized dogs receiving solvent (n = 11), ridogrel, 0.31 mg/kg intravenously, for thromboxane A2 synthase inhibition (n = 7) or ridogrel, 5 mg/kg, for additional prostaglandin endoperoxide receptor antagonism in addition to thromboxane A2 synthase inhibition (n = 7) 10 min before the administration of streptokinase.

RESULTS

Thrombolytic efficacy was greatest in animals receiving both dual-acting ridogrel, 5 mg/kg intravenously, and streptokinase as evidenced by the highest incidence of high grade coronary reperfusion (solvent 3 of 11; ridogrel, 0.31 mg/kg, 5 of 7; ridogrel, 5 mg/kg, 7 of 7; p < 0.05 vs. solvent) within the shortest delay (solvent 210 min; ridogrel, 0.31 mg/kg, 85 min; ridogrel, 5 mg/kg, 37 min; p < 0.05 vs. solvent and ridogrel, 0.31 mg/kg) and the lowest incidence of reocclusion (solvent 5 of 7; ridogrel, 0.31 mg/kg, 2 of 7; ridogrel, 5 mg/kg, 1 of 7; p < 0.05 versus solvent). Myocardial infarct size after coronary artery ligation (90 min) and subsequent reperfusion (150 min) in anesthetized dogs was 49.3 +/- 4.3% versus 29 +/- 3.9% (p < 0.05 vs. solvent) of the area of the left ventricle at risk in dogs receiving solvent (n = 9) or ridogrel, 5 mg/kg intravenously (n = 10), respectively, despite similar hemodynamic characteristics, collateral blood flow and area at risk in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Combined thromboxane A2 synthase inhibition and endoperoxide receptor antagonism 1) upgrades thrombolysis with streptokinase in canine coronary arteries, 2) limits myocardial infarct size after nonthrombotic coronary occlusion and reperfusion, and 3) may preserve ventricular function compromised by coronary occlusion through dual manipulation of the arachidonic acid cascade in blood and myocardial tissue, respectively.

Intravenous thrombolytic therapy in myocardial infarction: an analytical review

The properties and physiological effects of three currently FDA-approved thrombolytic agents, streptokinase (SK), tissue plasminogen activator (tPA), and anisoylated plasminogen activator complex (APSAC) are reviewed. All thrombolytic agents have been shown to reduce mortality postmyocardial infarction (MI). Comparative trials have failed to demonstrate a difference between the effects of tPA, SK, and APSAC on mortality. In addition, no consistent difference between the three agents on ejection fraction (EF) has been found despite a superior reperfusion rate with tPA at 90 min. Furthermore, reinfarction and interventional procedure rates were significantly higher after thrombolytic treatment, and the incidence of total strokes was higher with tPA than SK in some comparative studies. Based on analysis of the published megatrials, SK is a more cost-effective thrombolytic agent for patients with acute MI than tPA or APSAC.

Severe acute myocardial infarction during a staphylococcal septicemia with meningoencephalitis. A possible contraindication to thrombolytic treatment

We report the first case of lethal intracranial haemorrhage complicating a treatment by rt-PA in a patient presenting with a simultaneous staphylococcal septicemia with meningoencephalitis and an acute myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock. The presence of microvascular lesions in the central nervous system seems to be important risk factor for intracranial haemorrhage and we recommend extreme caution in the use of thrombolytic treatment in septicemic patients with acute myocardial infarction, particularly when neurological symptoms are present.

Variability in thrombolytic practice in Oregon

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To examine current thrombolytic protocols in Oregon emergency departments with regard to variations in patient evaluation, inclusion and exclusion criteria, initiation of therapy, and available thrombolytic agents.

DESIGN

Telephone survey of ED head nurses.

SETTING

All acute-care hospital EDs in Oregon.

TYPE OF PARTICIPANTS

Of 70 acute-care hospitals contacted, 67 (96%) were included: 61 (87%) have a written ED protocol for thrombolytic agent use.

METHODS

Telephone survey of written thrombolytic protocols, with comparison of groups using Kruskal-Wallis test (P less than .05).

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The primary modes of initiating thrombolytic therapy are at the emergency physician's discretion (32%). after private physician consultation (24%), through the use of an agreement developed by the emergency physicians in conjunction with cardiologists or internists (22%), or after cardiologist or internist consultation (22%). ECG interpretation before drug administration is most often performed by the emergency physician (41%), cardiologist or internist (28%), private physician (6%), or computer (10%). Both tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) and streptokinase are available at 50 hospitals (75%); tPA is used exclusively in ten (15%) and streptokinase in seven (10%) other hospitals. tPA and streptokinase are approved for ED use in 43 (72%) and 46 (81%), respectively, of the hospitals at which these agents are available. In these, the ED is the most frequent site of administration of tPA in only 28 (65%) and of streptokinase in 33 (72%) hospitals; tPA and streptokinase are kept in the ED in only 23 (53%) and 23 (50%) of these hospitals, respectively. There was a significant correlation between thrombolytic administration in the ED and the number of full-time emergency physicians and American Board of Emergency Medicine diplomates.

CONCLUSION

Thrombolytic protocols are highly variable in Oregon EDs.

Usefulness of a pericardial friction rub after thrombolytic therapy during acute myocardial infarction in predicting amount of myocardial damage. The TAMI Study Group

To evaluate the clinical incidence and outcomes of patients with pericarditis after thrombolytic therapy, 810 patients were prospectively studied during acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Pericarditis was defined as the presence of a pericardial friction rub during the hospital course. Only 5% of patients developed a rub during AMI, a low percent compared with that in the prethrombolytic era. A pericardial friction rub more often occurred in the setting of an anterior wall AMI. Patients with, compared to those without, a pericardial friction rub had lower ejection fractions (45 vs 51%, p = 0.002); worse regional left ventricular function (-3.2 vs 2.7, standard deviation per chord); higher in-hospital mortality (15 vs 6%, p = 0.056); a higher frequency of power failure (83 vs 57%); a higher frequency of anterior wall location of the AMI (53% of cases, p = 0.002); and a higher frequency of 3-vessel disease. Therefore, although the frequency of a pericardial friction rub was low (5%) compared with that in the prethrombolytic era, its occurrence denotes more extensive myocardial damage with a worse clinical outcome. Perhaps with successful reperfusion of the infarct-related vessel, transmural myocardial necrosis is prevented and with it the development of pericarditis. Cardiac tamponade did not occur clinically in any patient who developed a pericardial friction rub.

A comparison between heparin and low-dose aspirin as adjunctive therapy with tissue plasminogen activator for acute myocardial infarction. Heparin-Aspirin Reperfusion Trial (HART) Investigators

BACKGROUND

We report the results of the Heparin-Aspirin Reperfusion Trial, a collaborative study comparing early intravenous heparin with oral aspirin as adjunctive treatment when recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA) is used for coronary thrombolysis during acute myocardial infarction.

METHODS

Two hundred five patients were randomly assigned to receive either immediate and then continuous intravenous heparin (starting with a 5000-unit bolus; n = 106) or immediate and then daily oral aspirin (80 mg; n = 99) together with rt-PA (100 mg intravenously over a six-hour period) initiated within six hours of the onset of symptoms. We evaluated the patency of the infarct-related artery by angiography 7 to 24 hours after beginning rt-PA infusion, the frequency of reocclusion of the artery by repeat angiography on day 7, and ischemic or hemorrhagic complications during the hospital stay.

RESULTS

At the time of the first angiogram, 82 percent of the infarct-related arteries in the patients assigned to heparin were patent, as compared with only 52 percent in the aspirin group (P less than 0.0001). Of the initially patent vessels, 88 percent remained patent after seven days in the heparin group, as compared with 95 percent in the aspirin group (P not significant). The numbers of hemorrhagic events (18 in the heparin and 15 in the aspirin group) and recurrent ischemic events (8 in the heparin and 2 in the aspirin group) were similar in the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Coronary patency rates associated with rt-PA are higher with early concomitant systemic heparin treatment than with concomitant low-dose oral aspirin. This observation has important implications for clinical practice and should be considered in the design and interpretation of clinical trials involving coronary thrombolytic therapy.

Management comparison for acute myocardial infarction: direct angioplasty versus sequential thrombolysis-angioplasty

To compare the results and outcome of different management approaches for acute myocardial infarction, we analyzed our experience with early (i.e., within 6 hours of infarct onset) direct percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (group A) versus initial treatment with thrombolytic therapy (group B) followed by angioplasty. From 1982 to 1989 a total of 214 patients underwent primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction. During this time 157 patients underwent initial thrombolytic therapy, 104 with intravenous streptokinase and 53 with intravenous tissue-type plasminogen activator followed by angioplasty. Other than age (group A, 61.7 +/- 11.5 years; group B, 57.3 +/- 11.6 years; p = 0.0002), the clinical characteristics of the groups were similar. In group A, 197 (92.1%) had successful results, and 17 (7.9%) were failures. Of the group treated with thrombolytic therapy, there was an overall 81.5% patency rate for patients treated with streptokinase and tissue-type plasminogen activator with no significant difference between the agents. Angioplasty success after thrombolytic therapy was 94.3%. In-hospital and 1-year survival was significantly better in group B patients (95.5% and 95.5%, respectively) than in group A patients (92.1% and 89.3%, respectively). We conclude that both direct angioplasty and thrombolytic therapy followed by angioplasty provide high recanalization rates but that short- and long-term survival is improved when thrombolytic therapy precedes angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction patients.

Prediction of coronary artery reperfusion after tissue plasminogen activator infusion

We investigated whether clinical and laboratory variables can predict perfusion status after t-PA administration, by using the data from 138 patients who received t-PA during the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) I study. All clinical and laboratory variables that were collected at baseline or during perfusion for TIMI I were evaluated by the current study. Via stepwise discriminant analysis, 7 variables were closely associated with perfusion status at 90 minutes (listed in the order of their discriminant effect): baseline grade of stenosis in the infarct-related coronary artery, whether nausea was present during the infusion, baseline aspartate aminotransferase (SGOT) concentration, whether arrhythmias were present during the infusion, baseline fibrinogen concentration, baseline partial thromboplastin time, and baseline diastolic blood pressure. Baseline severity of stenosis and the likelihood of there being reperfusion were inversely related. Eighty-four percent of patients with adequate perfusion after 90 minutes of t-PA infusion were classified correctly, but only 50% of those without perfusion at 90 minutes were classified correctly. In addition, since 70% of the TIMI I patients, on average, did achieve perfusion, the use of these 7 variables added little predictive information. Our findings suggest that 1) there is as yet no practical way to predict reperfusion after t-PA therapy and 2) the severity of coronary stenoses, if known ahead of time, should be considered when selecting patients for thrombolytic therapy.

Thrombolytic therapy in acute myocardial infarction

Recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator (rt-PA), streptokinase (SK), and anisoylated plasminogen-streptokinase activator complex (APSAC) have salutary effects on mortality when administered to patients with evolving acute myocardial infarction (MI). Studies suggest that intravenous rt-PA is more effective in reperfusing occluded infarct-related arteries than SK, and the results of ongoing studies directly comparing the influence of SK and rt-PA on mortality are awaited. The clinical role of agents such as APSAC, urokinase, and pro-urokinase, used alone or in combination, remains to be determined. It is evident that a variety of thrombolytic agents will be effective, and variables such as ease of administration, pharmacokinetics, fibrin specificity, effects on blood viscosity, and incidence of adverse effects need to be assessed to determine which agents are the most suitable for clinical use. There is an increased risk of bleeding at vascular puncture sites with all thrombolytic agents. Current indications for thrombolytic therapy include ischemic chest pain of at least 30 min duration that is unrelieved by nitroglycerin and is associated with ST-segment elevations of at least 0.1 mV in two contiguous electrocardiographic leads. Such therapy is usually reserved for patients less than 75 years old who are not at increased risk for bleeding and whose chest pain began less than 4-6 prior to treatment. Trials are under way to determine whether patients with shorter pain duration, transient ST-segment changes (ie, unstable angina patients), chest pain associated with ST-segment depressions or T-wave inversions (ie, non-Q-wave infarction patients), or patients whose pain began more than 4 to 6 h earlier will benefit from early thrombolytic therapy. Other factors such as patient age, the likelihood of the diagnosis of MI, and the estimated risk of bleeding should also be considered. The findings of available major randomized trials indicate that early invasive procedures are generally unnecessary and that meticulous care must be exercised in the selection and management of patients subjected to thrombolytic therapy.

Role of aspirin with thrombolytic therapy in acute myocardial infarction

Thrombolytic therapy has been shown to limit infarct size, improve ventricular function, and decrease mortality in suspected evolving myocardial infarction (MI). Aspirin therapy also decreases mortality as well as stroke and reinfarction in suspected evolving MI. The combined ability of both agents to lyse as well as to prevent clots yields a greater benefit than either alone. The use of aspirin with thrombolysis also protects against the increase in reinfarction observed when thrombolytic therapy is given alone. While ongoing research is evaluating the optimal thrombolytic agent as well as the possible role of heparin, it is already clear that the use of aspirin with thrombolytic therapy will significantly decrease reinfarction, stroke, and vascular mortality in suspected evolving MI.

Combined tissue-type plasminogen activator and prostacyclin therapy for acute myocardial infarction. Thrombolysis and Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction (TAMI) 4 Study Group

Current limitations of recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator (rt-PA) therapy for acute myocardial infarction include failure to achieve recanalization in 25% of patients, reocclusion and reperfusion injury. Iloprost, a stable analogue of prostacyclin (PGI2), has been demonstrated to facilitate thrombolysis and reduce myocardial stunning in experimental models. To evaluate combined therapy, rt-PA (100 mg 3 h) and Iloprost (2 ng/kg per min for 48 h) were administered to 25 patients and then rt-PA alone (same dose) was given to an additional 25 patients with evolving myocardial infarction. At 90 min after drug administration, infarct-related vessel patency was observed in 11 (44%) of 25 who received rt-PA plus Iloprost compared with 15 (60%) of 25 who received rt-PA alone (p = 0.26). At 1 week, reocclusion had occurred in 3 (14%) of 21 patients who received combined therapy compared with 6 (26%) of 23 patients treated with rt-PA alone (p = 0.46). Ejection fraction increased significantly from baseline to 7 days for rt-PA alone whereas it decreased with combined therapy (rt-PA alone whereas it decreased with combined therapy (rt-PA alone: 47.3 +/- 11.5% at baseline to 50.4 +/- 9.8% at 7 days; rt-PA plus Iloprost: 51.3 +/- 10.1% at baseline to 49.0 +/- 9.4% at 7 days; difference between groups p = 0.05). At 4 h after therapy, fibrinogen decreased 33% for rt-PA plus Iloprost compared with a 52% for rt-PA alone (p = 0.001). Fibrinogen degradation products increased 60% more for rt-PA alone than for rt-PA plus Ilprost. Thus, the combination of rt-PA plus Iloprost at the doses employed did not improve immediate or follow-up coronary artery patency or left ventricular functional recovery compared with that achieved with rt-PA alone.

Patient selection for percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction

Whether thrombolytic therapy or immediate angioplasty should be the preferred treatment for patients with acute myocardial infarction has not yet been decided. Emergency angioplasty can be used as primary therapy, as an adjunct to thrombolytic therapy, or as a salvage procedure in patients in whom thrombolysis fails. Immediate angioplasty produces a higher recanalization rate, yet reclosure is more likely with this procedure. In many cases, patient selection for acute angioplasty remains controversial. Randomized trials comparing the results of thrombolysis with those of angioplasty are needed before definitive decisions can be made.

Thrombolytic reperfusion of acute myocardial infarction: resolved and unresolved issues

Intensive clinical investigation has led to the acceptance of many fundamental aspects of reperfusion therapy, especially its salutary effects on improved survival, left ventricular function and reduced infarct size. However, many unresolved issues are currently being addressed or will be the focus of future clinical trials. These include patient selection with respect to risk profile and time of presentation, the choice of a thrombolytic agent, the role of adjunctive therapies and the optimal use and timing of follow-up coronary revascularization procedures. The rapidly evolving status of myocardial reperfusion therapy is reviewed, with specific attention to these important yet unresolved aspects.