Decision analysis in clinical cardiology: when is coronary angiography required in aortic stenosis?

Acquired aortic stenosis

Aortic stenosis is the most commonly encountered valvular disease in the elderly, with approximately 2-3% of individuals over 65 years of age afflicted. The most common cause of acquired aortic stenosis is calcific degeneration, characterized by a slowly progressive, asymptomatic period which can last decades. Once symptomatic, the clinical manifestation of aortic stenosis is from functional obstruction of left ventricular outflow and the additional hemodynamic effects on the left ventricle and vasculature. With advances in echocardiography, individuals with aortic stenosis are increasingly diagnosed in the asymptomatic latent period. However, echocardiographic measures alone cannot identify clinically significant outflow obstruction as there is considerable overlap in hemodynamic severity between symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals. Current clinical guidelines predicate the timing of surgical valve replacement on the presence or absence of symptoms. Management for symptomatic, significant stenosis is surgical valve replacement as there are no current medical therapies reliably proven to decrease aortic stenosis severity or improve long-term outcomes. However, recent retrospective studies have demonstrated an association between atherosclerotic disease risk factors, such as hyperlipidemia and aortic stenosis. Given these findings, there are now advocates for prospective primary prevention trials for aortic stenosis in patients with mild or moderate valvular disease. The following paper will discuss etiology, diagnostic evaluation and therapeutic options of acquired aortic stenosis. This review will discuss etiology, diagnostic evaluation, and therapeutic options of acquired aortic stenosis.

Role of circulating osteogenic progenitor cells in calcific aortic stenosis

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to determine the role of circulating endothelial progenitor cells with osteoblastic phenotype (EPC-OCN) in human aortic valve calcification (AVC).

BACKGROUND

Recent evidence suggests that rather than passive mineralization, AVC is an active atherosclerotic process with an osteoblastic component resembling coronary calcification. We have recently identified circulating EPCs with osteogenic properties carrying both endothelial progenitor (CD34, KDR) and osteoblastic (osteocalcin [OCN]) cell surface markers.

METHODS

Blood samples from controls (n = 22) and patients with mild to moderate calcific aortic stenosis (mi-moAS, n = 17), severe calcific AS (sAS, n = 26), and both sAS and severe coronary artery disease (sCAD) (n = 33) were collected during diagnostic coronary angiography. By using flow cytometry, peripheral blood mononuclear cells were analyzed for CD34, KDR, and OCN. Resected normal and calcified aortic valves were analyzed histologically.

RESULTS

Patients with mi-moAS and patients with sAS/sCAD had significantly less EPCs (CD34+/KDR+/OCN-) than controls. Patients with sAS showed significantly higher numbers of EPC-OCN (CD34+/KDR+/OCN+) than controls. In addition, the percentage of EPC costaining for OCN was higher in all disease groups compared with controls. A subgroup analysis of younger patients with bicuspid sAS showed a similar pattern of significantly lower EPCs but a high percentage of coexpression of OCN. Immunofluorescence showed colocalization of nuclear factor kappa-B and OCN in diseased and normal valves. CD34+/OCN+ cells were abundant in the endothelial and deeper cell layers of calcific aortic valve tissue but not in normal aortic valve tissue.

CONCLUSIONS

Circulating EPC-OCN may play a significant role in the pathogenesis and as markers of prognostication of calcific AS.

16-Detector row computed tomographic coronary angiography in patients undergoing evaluation for aortic valve replacement: comparison with catheter angiography

AIM

To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of 16-detector row computed tomography (CT) in assessing haemodynamically significant coronary artery stenoses in patients under evaluation for aortic stenosis pre-aortic valve replacement.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Forty consecutive patients under evaluation for severe aortic stenosis and listed for cardiac catheterization before potential aortic valve replacement underwent coronary artery calcium (CAC) scoring and retrospective electrocardiogram (ECG)-gated multi-detector row computed tomographic coronary angiography (MDCTA) using a GE Lightspeed 16-detector row CT within 1 month of invasive coronary angiography (ICA) for comparative purposes. All 13 major coronary artery segments of the American Heart Association model were evaluated for the presence of > or =50% stenosis and compared to the reference standard. Data were analysed on a segment-by-segment basis and also in "whole patient" terms.

RESULTS

A total of 412/450 segments from 35 patients were suitable for analysis. The overall accuracy of MDCTA for detection of segments with > or =50% stenosis was high, with a sensitivity of 81.3%, specificity 95.0%, positive predictive value (PPV) 57.8%, and negative predictive value (NPV) 98.4%. On a "whole-patient" basis, 100% (19/19) of patients with significant coronary disease were correctly identified and there were no false-negatives. Excluding patients with CAC >1000 from the analysis improved the accuracy of MDCTA to: sensitivity 90%, specificity 98.1%, PPV 60%, NPV 99.7%.

CONCLUSION

Non-invasive 16-detector row MDCTA accurately excludes significant coronary disease in patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing evaluation before aortic valve replacement and in whom ICA can therefore be avoided. Its segment-by-segment accuracy is improved further if CAC>1000 is used as a gatekeeper to MDCTA.

Reproducibility of electron-beam CT measures of aortic valve calcification

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

The authors performed this study to establish the interscan, interobserver, and intraobserver reproducibility of aortic valve calcification (AVC) measurements obtained with electron-beam computed tomography (CT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The authors evaluated electron-beam CT scans from all patients who had undergone two serial examinations on the same day as part of a study of coronary artery calcification reproducibility. In patients in whom aortic valve calcium was identified at electron-beam CT, AVC scores were measured with both the Agatston and the volumetric methods, which were developed previously to quantify coronary calcium.

RESULTS

Forty-four asymptomatic patients (mean age, 66 years +/- 9) with AVC at electron-beam CT were included in the analyses. AVC score reproducibility was excellent with both the Agatston and the volumetric methods (R2 = 0.99, P = .0001 for both), with median interscan variabilities of 7% and 6.2%, respectively. Interscan reproducibility was similar, whether the analysis included all scans or was restricted to those with scores greater than 10 or greater than 30. For the volumetric method, the median interobserver variability was 5% and the median intraobserver variability was 1%.

CONCLUSION

The low interscan, interobserver, and intraobserver variabilities at electron-beam CT suggest that this method should be useful for the noninvasive monitoring of AVC changes over time and for assessing the efficacy of therapies aimed at slowing AVC accumulation.

Association of aortic-valve sclerosis with cardiovascular mortality and morbidity in the elderly

BACKGROUND

Although aortic-valve stenosis is clearly associated with adverse cardiovascular outcomes, it is unclear whether valve sclerosis increases the risk of cardiovascular events.

METHODS

We assessed echocardiograms obtained at base line from 5621 men and women 65 years of age or older who were enrolled in a population-based prospective study. On echocardiography, the aortic valve was normal in 70 percent (3919 subjects), sclerotic without outflow obstruction in 29 percent (1610), and stenotic in 2 percent (92). The subjects were followed for a mean of 5.0 years to assess the risk of death from any cause and of death from cardiovascular causes. Cardiovascular morbidity was defined as new episodes of myocardial infarction, angina pectoris, congestive heart failure, or stroke.

RESULTS

There was a stepwise increase in deaths from any cause (P for trend, <0.001) and deaths from cardiovascular causes (P for trend, <0.001) with increasing aortic-valve abnormality; the respective rates were 14.9 and 6.1 percent in the group with normal aortic valves, 21.9 and 10.1 percent in the group with aortic sclerosis, and 41.3 and 19.6 percent in the group with aortic stenosis. The relative risk of death from cardiovascular causes among subjects without coronary heart disease at base line was 1.66 (95 percent confidence interval, 1.23 to 2.23) for those with sclerotic valves as compared with those with normal valves, after adjustment for age and sex. The relative risk remained elevated after further adjustment for clinical factors associated with sclerosis (relative risk, 1.52; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.12 to 2.05). The relative risk of myocardial infarction was 1.40 (95 percent confidence interval, 1.07 to 1.83) among subjects with aortic sclerosis, as compared with those with normal aortic valves.

CONCLUSIONS

Aortic sclerosis is common in the elderly and is associated with an increase of approximately 50 percent in the risk of death from cardiovascular causes and the risk of myocardial infarction, even in the absence of hemodynamically significant obstruction of left ventricular outflow.

Valvular disease in the elderly

As the incidence of valvular disease in the elderly is increasing, understanding of its pathogenesis and natural progression as well as surgical approaches and device technologies are improving. Future studies are needed to develop medical interventions that slow or halt the degenerative valvular processes associated with aging. In addition, mechanical approaches with lower operative risks should be explored and the search should continue for a valve substitute that is durable, hemodynamically efficient, easy to implant, and does not require anticoagulation. Hopefully, future intervention trials will include quality of life assessments such as symptoms, functional capacity and perceptions of well being. At present, the degenerative valvular processes must be followed closely by the clinician, and individual management decisions for the elderly based on the type and severity of valve disease, comorbid medical conditions, and the risks and benefits of intervention, along with patient preferences, rather than on the chronologic age of the patient. It is becoming clear that both survival and quality of life outcomes can improve by consideration of surgery at the onset of indications, before further deterioration eliminates the opportunity to provide benefit for the elderly patient with valvular disease.

Aortic stenosis. Clinical evaluation and optimal timing of surgery

Aortic valve disease is common in the elderly with recent data suggesting that aortic sclerosis and stenosis are the end-stage of an active disease process. Aortic atenosis may be diagnosed at symptom onset (angina, heart failure or syncope) but often the diagnosis is suspected in an asymptomatic patient with a systolic murmur. The diagnosis can be confirmed and disease severity evaluated reliably using Doppler echocardiography. Symptomatic severe aortic stenosis is treated with valve replacement, even in the elderly, due to the extremely poor prognosis without relief of outflow obstruction. Management is controversial when there is coexisting moderate aortic stenosis and left ventricular systolic dysfunction.

Clinical factors associated with calcific aortic valve disease. Cardiovascular Health Study

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of aortic sclerosis and stenosis in the elderly and to identify clinical factors associated with degenerative aortic valve disease.

BACKGROUND

Several lines of evidence suggest that degenerative aortic valve disease is not an inevitable consequence of aging and may be associated with specific clinical factors.

METHODS

In 5,201 subjects > or = 65 years of age enrolled in the Cardiovascular Health Study, the relation between aortic sclerosis or stenosis identified on echocardiography and clinical risk factors for atherosclerosis was evaluated by using stepwise logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

Aortic valve sclerosis was present in 26% and aortic valve stenosis in 2% of the entire study cohort; in subjects > or = 75 years of age, sclerosis was present in 37% and stenosis in 2.6%. Independent clinical factors associated with degenerative aortic valve disease included age (twofold increased risk for each 10-year increase in age), male gender (twofold excess risk), present smoking (35% increase in risk) and a history of hypertension (20% increase in risk). Other significant factors included height and high lipoprotein(a) and low density lipoprotein cholesterol levels.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical factors associated with aortic sclerosis and stenosis can be identified and are similar to risk factors for atherosclerosis.

Osteopontin is expressed in human aortic valvular lesions

BACKGROUND

Nonrheumatic stenosis of trileaflet aortic valves, in which calcification is a prominent feature, has been termed a "degenerative" condition, but it has been demonstrated recently that chronic inflammation is a characteristic feature of the developing lesion of aortic stenosis. This observation raised the possibility that calcification in the aortic valve might be actively regulated. Thus, the present study investigated whether osteopontin, a protein implicated in the regulation of both normal and dystrophic calcification, could be detected in lesions of valvular aortic stenosis.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Morphological and immunohistochemical studies were performed on 14 human aortic valves, representing a range of pathology from normal to clinically stenotic. The extent of calcification and macrophage accumulation and their relation to the presence of osteopontin protein were characterized. Highly statistically significant associations were found between the degree of osteopontin expression and the degrees of both calcification and macrophage accumulation in early through late lesions of aortic stenosis. Further, in situ hybridization localized osteopontin mRNA to a subset of lesion macrophages.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that, rather than representing a degenerative and unmodifiable process, calcification in aortic stenosis may be, in part, an actively regulated process with the potential for control either through modification of inflammation or synthesis of proteins such as osteopontin, which may modulate calcification in this tissue.

Adenosine pharmacologic stress myocardial perfusion tomographic imaging in patients with significant aortic stenosis. Diagnostic efficacy and comparison of clinical, hemodynamic and electrocardiographic variables with 100 age-matched control subjects

OBJECTIVES

This study assessed the safety and diagnostic accuracy of adenosine stress myocardial perfusion scintigraphy for the detection of coronary artery disease using single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) in patients with significant aortic stenosis.

BACKGROUND

Exercise cardiac stress testing in patients with significant aortic stenosis is generally avoided because of concerns for safety. In addition, those studies that have analyzed the utility of exercise testing both with and without myocardial thallium-201 scintigraphy for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease have yielded low specificity. Currently, no safe and accurate means exists to noninvasively assess the presence, extent and severity of coronary artery disease in patients with significant aortic stenosis.

METHODS

The study included 35 patients with moderate to severe aortic stenosis (mean [+/- SD] aortic valve area 0.84 +/- 0.16 cm2, range 0.5 to 1.2; mean maximal instantaneous aortic valve gradient 44.4 +/- 15.9 mm Hg, range 20 to 84). All patients underwent a 6-min adenosine infusion (140 micrograms/kg body weight per min) protocol and either separate acquisition rest thallium-201/stress technetium-99m sestamibi or stress and 4-h redistribution thallium-201 SPECT: Visual 20-segment SPECT analysis used a standard five-point scoring system from 0 (normal tracer uptake) to 4 (absent uptake). The SPECT results were considered abnormal if more than two segments had a stress score > or = 2. Hemodynamic, electrocardiographic and clinical responses were compared with those in a reference group of 100 consecutive age-matched patients undergoing adenosine SPECT who did not have aortic stenosis.

RESULTS

Hemodynamic responses during adenosine stress testing between the study and control patients demonstrated no significant difference in the net change in systolic blood pressure (18% of baseline vs. 14%, patients with aortic stenosis vs. control subjects), heart rate (21% vs. 19%), rate-pressure product (0% vs. 2%) or incidence of chest pain (23% vs. 35%) or transient second-(9% vs. 9%) or third-degree atrioventricular block (3% vs. 1%). In the 20 patients who had coronary angiography, sensitivity for detection of coronary artery disease was 92% (12 of 13) and specificity was 71% (5 of 7).

CONCLUSIONS

In this preliminary study, adenosine was found to be well tolerated and diagnostically accurate in patients with moderate to severe aortic stenosis.

Exclusion of coronary artery disease by exercise thallium-201 tomography in patients with aortic valve stenosis

In many patients with valvular aortic stenosis (AS), management decisions may be possible without invasive studies if coexistent coronary artery disease (CAD) can be ruled out noninvasively. The use of thallium-201 single-photon emission computed tomography to the exclusion of CAD was studied in 44 patients aged 41 to 78 years with AS. In addition to cardiac catheterization and selective coronary angiography, patients underwent a cardiac ultrasound study and thallium-201 myocardial perfusion imaging at rest and after bicycle ergometer exercise. Two thirds of the patients had critical AS (valve area index less than or equal to 0.5 cm2/m2) but none had left ventricular systolic dysfunction. Twenty-one patients had angiographically significant CAD (greater than or equal to 50% diameter stenosis in greater than or equal to 1 coronary artery), whereas 23 had either a fully normal angiogram (n = 17) or mild (less than 50%) stenoses (n = 6). Each patient with significant CAD had an abnormal thallium-201 tomogram, either a strictly segmental perfusion defect (n = 19), or a patchy nonsegmental abnormality (n = 2); however, 10 of 23 patients free of significant CAD had similar results. Thus, the sensitivity and specificity of an abnormal scintigram were 100 and 57%, respectively. If only segmental perfusion defects typical of CAD had been considered abnormal, then the sensitivity of the test would have been 90% and the specificity 70%. Patients with false abnormal scintigrams had more severe AS and more angiographically nonsignificant CAD than those with true normal findings.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Prophylactic use of the intra-aortic balloon pump in high-risk cardiac patients undergoing noncardiac surgery: a decision analytic view

OBJECTIVE

As the indications for the intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) continue to evolve, a potential new use may be the prophylactic preoperative insertion of the IABP in the high-risk cardiac patient undergoing noncardiac surgery. Our objective is to present a general approach to the high-risk cardiac patient who may benefit from the prophylactic insertion of the IABP.

DESIGN

Case reports and a decision analysis.

METHODS

A decision model was constructed that weighs the risk of life-threatening postoperative complications against the risk of vascular complications, including surgery and possible amputation, from IABP insertion.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

A review of the literature identified 10 patients who underwent IABP placement prior to noncardiac surgery. These patients, along with our three cases, define a population of patients for whom the prophylactic IABP may be useful. This population includes patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) for whom bypass grafting is not an option due to: (1) inoperable CAD; (2) a severe coexisting disease process (such as a malignancy); or (3) the emergent nature of the noncardiac procedure. The decision analysis suggests that patients whose preoperative assessment places them at very high risk for postoperative complications (Goldman class IV or Detsky class III undergoing major surgery) may benefit the most from prophylactic placement of an IABP prior to noncardiac surgery.