Exacerbation of ventricular arrhythmias during the postoperative period after implantation of an automatic defibrillator

Sudden death in implantable cardioverter-defibrillator recipients: clinical context, arrhythmic events and device responses

OBJECTIVES

We sought to investigate the nature of terminal events and potential contributory clinical and nonclinical (e.g., device-related) factors associated with sudden death (SD) in recipients of an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD).

BACKGROUND

The ICD is very effective in terminating ventricular tachycardia (VT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF), but protection against SD is not absolute. Little is known about the nature and potential causes of SD in patients with ICDs.

METHODS

We analyzed 25 cases of out-of-hospital SD among patients enrolled in the clinical investigation of the Cadence Tiered-Therapy Defibrillator System.

RESULTS

All patients (24 men and 1 woman, mean age 62+/-10 years) received epicardial lead systems. The majority (92%) had coronary artery disease and a previous myocardial infarction (MI), with a mean left ventricular ejection fraction 0.25+/-0.07. At device implantation, the mean defibrillation threshold was 13+/-5 J. Sudden death occurred 13+/-11 months later. Twenty patients (80%) had received appropriate ICD therapies before death, and 18 (72%) were receiving > or = 1 antiarrhythmic drugs at the time of death. Sudden death was tachyarrhythmia-associated in 16 patients (64%), non-tachyarrhythmia-associated in 7 (28%) and indeterminate in 2 (8%). In the 16 patients with tachyarrhythmia-associated SD, the overall first therapy success rate in tachycardia and fibrillation zones was 60% and 67%, respectively. However, despite protracted therapies (> or = 2 shocks) in 7 (66%) of 12 patients who received fibrillation therapies, the final tachyarrhythmic episode was ultimately terminated by the ICD in 15 (94%) of the 16 patients, whereas 1 patient died after multiple (initially successful) internal and external shocks for intractable VT/VF during exercise. In 10 patients (40%) one or more, primarily clinical, factors potentially contributory to SD were identified: heart failure (n=8), angina (n=2), hypokalemia (n=1), adverse antiarrhythmic drug treatment (n=1) and acute MI (n=1). An additional 10 patients (40%) had experienced an increase in frequency of ICD shocks within 3 months of SD. Appropriate battery voltages and normal circuitry function were found in all devices interrogated and analyzed after death.

CONCLUSIONS

In this select group of patients receiving a third-generation ICD, SD was associated with VT or VF events in nearly two-thirds of patients, and death occurred despite ultimately successful, although often protracted, device therapies. These observations, along with evidence of recent worsening clinical status, suggest acute cardiac mechanical dysfunction as a frequent terminal factor. In recipients with ICDs, SD directly attributable to device failure seems to be rare.

Ventricular tachycardia during follow-up in patients resuscitated from ventricular fibrillation: experience from stored electrograms of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to use the electrogram storage capabilities of the implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) to categorize any arrhythmic event during follow-up in a group of patients who had survived an episode of ventricular fibrillation (VF) and to possibly identify clinical predictors of future arrhythmic events.

BACKGROUND

Little is known about the electrophysiologic characteristics of ventricular arrhythmias recurring during follow-up in survivors of VF as the sole documented arrhythmia at the time of resuscitation.

METHODS

Forty patients (58+/-10 years; 73% men; left ventricular ejection fraction 42+/-18%; 70% with coronary artery disease) who had survived an episode of VF and subsequently received an ICD capable of intracardiac electrogram recording and storage were followed for 23+/-11 months. In all patients, the arrhythmogenic substrate was investigated by means of programmed electrical stimulation (PES).

RESULTS

Among the 40 patients, 41 episodes of ventricular arrhythmias were documented in 13 patients (33%): 36 episodes of ventricular tachycardias (VT) were recorded in 11 patients (28%) and 5 episodes of VF were recorded in the remaining 2 patients (5%). Age, gender, cardiac disease and left ventricular ejection fraction failed to distinguish between patients with clinical recurrences and patients without. The sensitivity, specificity and positive accuracy of PES were 29%, 63% and 46%, respectively, for prediction of ventricular arrhythmia recurrence; 45%, 70% and 36%, respectively, for prediction of VT; and 50%, 98% and 50%, respectively, for prediction of VF during follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

In survivors of VF receiving ICD therapy, VT is the most common ventricular arrhythmia recorded on device-incorporated electrograms during follow-up. This finding, associated with the relatively well-preserved ventricular function, may account for the ability of these patients to survive at time of the index arrhythmia; the use of antitachycardia pacing as a modality to treat arrhythmia recurrences may contribute to reduce the incidence of shock during follow-up in these patients.

Epicardial cardioverter-defibrillators do not cause postoperative arrhythmias. The CABG Patch Trial Investigators. Coronary Artery Bypass Graft

The CABG Patch Trial is a controlled, multicenter clinical trial that randomized high-risk patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) to prophylactic implantation of an epicardial implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) or to no additional treatment, permitting a controlled evaluation of the effect of epicardial ICDs on the incidence of postoperative arrhythmias. We found no significant difference in the development of postoperative arrhythmias between patients who received epicardial ICDs and the control group treated with CABG alone.

Experience with unipolar pectoral defibrillation

With simple, single lead unipolar pectoral defibrillators, ICD technology has reached a level of ease and safety comparable to pacemaker implantation. It will be difficult to further decrease the morbidity associated with ICD implantation; just as it will be difficult to improve upon current device treatment of sudden cardiac death. Even as further incremental improvements in devices and leads will undoubtedly occur, at this point in ICD evolution, it is investigating the expanded use of this therapy as a prevention tool that is likely to have the largest overall impact on cardiac arrest survival.

Unipolar pectoral defibrillation systems

Over the past 15 years, the implantation of automatic defibrillations has evolved from an obscure, impractical, and often morbid procedure to nearly a routine therapy. Initial large abdominally implanted generators with multiple epicardial leads have given way to much smaller, pectorally implanted systems utilizing only a single lead. These systems are better accepted by physicians and patients and rival recent-generation pacemakers in their implantation simplicity. Outcomes with single lead defibrillator implantation have been excellent. They are 99% effective at eliminating sudden death in large cohorts of patients, with overall survival of 94.4% at 18 months. Previously significant perioperative complications and mortality associated with epicardial systems have been virtually eliminated. Transvenous single lead systems now provide defibrillation efficacy at a level that makes epicardial leads unnecessary in most patients. Although inappropriate shocks are not a morbid complication, they still occur in approximately 15%-30% of patients. This is an area for improvement in defibrillator therapy, which, though invisible in total mortality statistics, is significant in terms of patient comfort and acceptance. Incremental improvements in pulse generator design and defibrillator lead technology are being made. Perhaps the most interesting new development will be the dual chamber device, incorporating and atrial electrode for sensing, pacing, and perhaps, atrial defibrillation. Such improvements will continue to make device therapy of all arrhythmias more versatile and improve patient comfort both in terms of device size and inappropriate shocks. It is unlikely, however, that further technological advances can further diminish the already small complication rate or improve the already excellent efficacy of current single lead systems. Defibrillator technology has already reached a maturity where technological improvements are less significant than efforts to better define the patient population who will benefit from the therapy.

Comparison of long-term outcomes of patients treated with nonthoracotomy and thoracotomy implantable defibrillators

In 193 consecutive patients treated with implantable defibrillators at our institution, thoracotomy approaches were used in 87 patients and nonthoracotomy approaches in 106 patients. Long-term outcomes of the 2 groups were compared by the intention-to-treat analysis. Surgical mortality (30-day mortality) rates were 5.7% in the thoracotomy group and 0% in the nonthoracotomy group. Six of 106 patients who underwent nonthoracotomy implantation had a high defibrillation threshold and did not receive nonthoracotomy defibrillators. The duration of follow-up was 52 +/- 31 months in the thoracotomy group, and 23 +/- 15 months in nonthoracotomy group. Actuarial survival rates at 6 and 24 months were, respectively, 90% and 81% in nonthoracotomy patients and 89% and 80% in thoracotomy patients (p = NS). In patients with left ventricular ejection fraction <30%, surgical mortality was 0% by the nonthoracotomy and 10% by the thoracotomy approach. Despite the 10% difference in 30-day mortality, survival rates at 6 months were 85% in nonthoracotomy patients and 81% in thoracotomy patients. At 24 months they were 73% in nonthoracotomy patients and 74% in thoracotomy patients. Thus, this nonrandomized study suggests that while short-term survival is better in nonthoracotomy patients than thoracotomy patients, the difference in survival diminishes quickly during the first few months and disappears by 6 months. The results were similar in patients with severe ventricular dysfunction. Several important implantable-cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) trials initially utilized thoracotomy ICDs. Although questions may be raised with regard to applicability of such a trial in the era of nonthoracotomy ICDs, this study suggests that the results of such ICD trials will be largely applicable to patients treated with nonthoracotomy ICDs.

Defibrillation shocks over epicardial patches produce sympathetic neural dysfunction in man

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of direct current (DC) shocks on cardiac sympathetic innervation in humans using I-123-metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) scintigraphy. Decreased efferent sympathetic neural function has been demonstrated following > 10-J DC shocks delivered through epicardial patch electrodes in dogs. To evaluate the effect of DC shocks on cardiac sympathetic innervation in humans, we performed MIBG scintigraphy in 11 patients (ages 46 to 75 years) prior to and after receiving shocks from an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD).

METHODS AND RESULTS

This study was performed during an ICD generator change in 7 patients with epicardial patch electrodes and at the time of initial ICD implantation in 4 patients: 2 with epicardial patch electrodes, and 2 with a transvenous ICD system. All patients had spontaneous and inducible ventricular tachycardia. Prior to ICD implantation and remote from any cardioversions or shocks, baseline MIBG and thallium-201 scintigraphy were performed. Repeat MIBG scintigraphy was performed after delivery of ICD shocks and compared with the baseline scans to determine the effect of the shock on sympathetic neural function. The baseline scans revealed focal areas of reduced MIBG uptake in areas of thallium perfusion defects in all patients except the patient without structural heart disease whose scans were normal. Postshock, patients with epicardial patch electrodes who received at least one 24-J shock and had the postshock MIBG scan performed within 4 hours demonstrated no cardiac uptake of MIBG. Two patients with epicardial patch electrodes had no change in the postshock MIBG scans: 1 had a maximal shock of 20 J, and the other had the postshock scan delayed for 11 hours. The 2 patients with a transvenous lead system demonstrated no change in the postshock MIBG scan when compared with baseline.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that following DC shocks delivered over epicardial patch electrodes, there is diffuse reduction in MIBG uptake that probably represents cardiac sympathetic neural dysfunction that appears to be transient. Sympathetic function does not appear to be affected by shocks delivered over a transvenous lead system.

Comparison of early and late complications in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery with and without concomitant placement of an implantable cardioverter defibrillator

Previous studies have reported a significant morbidity and mortality associated with coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery in conjunction with the placement of an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) with an epicardial lead system. In the absence of a control group, how significantly the component of concomitant placement of the ICD system contributes to these untoward outcomes remains unknown. The purpose of this study was to assess the short- and long-term complications in patients undergoing CABG surgery in conjunction with the placement of an ICD with epicardial leads and to compare these complications with those of patients who had only CABG surgery (control group). The study group (group A) consisted of 56 patients who underwent CABG surgery and placement of an ICD pulse generator with epicardial leads. A control group (group B) consisted of 56 patients who underwent CABG surgery only during the same time period. The two groups were matched for age, sex distribution, left ventricular function, surgical approach, number of bypass grafts per patient, bypass pump time, and length of follow-up period. The early mortality for group A was 7.1% versus 1.8% for group B (p > 0.05). The incidence of early morbidity (congestive heart failure, infection, supraventricular and ventricular arrhythmias) for groups A and B was similar (26.8% vs 25.0%, p > 0.05).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

The proarrhythmic potential of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators

The implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) is remarkably effective in preventing sudden cardiac death in high-risk patients, but it also has the capacity to provoke or worsen cardiac arrhythmias. Tachyarrhythmias or bradyarrhythmias may result from the delivery of antitachycardia or antibradycardia therapies by tiered-therapy defibrillators. This proarrhythmia, although rarely fatal, increases the morbidity associated with defibrillator therapy. Proarrhythmia is related as much to suboptimal programming as to technical limitations of the device. The proarrhythmic potential of ICD therapy can be minimized by tailoring the "electrical prescription" according to characteristics of the clinical arrhythmia and individual ICD idiosyncrasies.

Implantable defibrillators for high-risk patients with heart failure who are awaiting cardiac transplantation

The objective of this study was to assess the operative risk and efficacy of implantable defibrillators for preventing sudden death in patients with heart failure awaiting transplantation. The average waiting time for elective cardiac transplantation is 6 months to 1 year. Sudden cardiac death is the major source of mortality in outpatients in stable condition awaiting cardiac transplantation. The efficacy of implantable defibrillator therapy in this population is not established. We analyzed the operative risk, time to appropriate shock, and sudden death in 15 patients determined to be at high risk of sudden death who were accepted onto the outpatient cardiac transplant waiting list. Nonfatal postoperative complications occurred in two (13%) subjects with epicardial defibrillating lead systems and in none with transvenous lead systems. Defibrillation energies were 16 +/- 2 J versus 24 +/- 2 J with epicardial and transvenous lead systems, respectively. Sudden death free survival until transplantation was 93%. Most of the patients (60%) had an appropriate shock during a mean follow-up of 11 +/- 12 months. The mean time to an appropriate shock was 3 +/- 3 months. Hospital readmission was required in three (20%) subjects to await transplantation on an urgent basis. However, two of these subjects had received appropriate shocks before readmission. In selected patients at high risk for sudden death while on the outpatient cardiac transplant waiting list, the operative risk is low and adequate defibrillation energies can be obtained to allow implantable defibrillator placement. Most subjects will have an appropriate shock as outpatients before transplantation, and sudden death free survival is excellent.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Long-term temporal patterns of ventricular tachyarrhythmias

BACKGROUND

Technological limitations have precluded investigation of long-term temporal patterns of ventricular tachyarrhythmia recurrences. Newer implantable cardioverter-defibrillators permit such analyses by accurately recording the time and date of tachycardia detections during long-term follow-up. This study tests the hypothesis that ventricular tachycardia occurrences are randomly distributed over time in individual patients.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The time and date of 727 episodes of ventricular tachyarrhythmias were recorded from the data logs of 31 patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators followed for a median of 177 days (range, 7 to 782 days). All patients had three or more ventricular tachycardia detections and no detections from causes other than ventricular arrhythmias. In 28 of 31 patients, the distribution of the interdetection time intervals during follow-up differed significantly (all P < .01) from an exponential model distribution of interdetection intervals that assumed that detections were equally likely to occur at any time during follow-up (random). The Kolmogorov-Smirnov goodness-of-fit test was used to compare sample and model distributions. In each patient, the nonrandom distributions resulted from a preponderance of interdetection time intervals that were shorter than predicted by the random model, resulting in a temporal clustering of arrhythmic events. The interdetection interval was < or = 1 hour and < or = 91 hours for 55% and 78% of all intervals, respectively. When only those episodes receiving shock or antitachycardia pacing therapy were analyzed, 25 of 29 patients still manifested nonrandom distributions (all P < .01). When only episodes with tachycardia rates > 240 beats per minute were analyzed, 11 of 13 patients manifested non-random distributions (all P < .01).

CONCLUSIONS

Ventricular tachycardia detections and delivered antitachycardia therapies by implantable cardioverter-defibrillators are nonrandomly distributed throughout long-term follow-up in the majority of patients. The temporal clustering of these arrhythmic events may allow preemptive antiarrhythmic therapy and should be considered in the design of therapy based on suppression of spontaneous ventricular arrhythmias to statistically derived end points.

Limitations and late complications of third-generation automatic cardioverter-defibrillators

BACKGROUND

This study examines the limitations and complex management problems associated with the use of tiered-therapy, implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs).

METHODS AND RESULTS

The study group comprises the first 154 patients undergoing implantation of tiered-therapy ICDs at our institution. Pulse generators from three different manufacturers were used. In 39 patients, a complete nonthoracotomy lead system was used. The perioperative mortality was 1.3%. Of these 154 patients, 37% experienced late postoperative problems. Twenty-one patients required system revision within 36.5 months (mean, 8.57 +/- 11.3) of surgery. Reasons for revision were spurious shocks due to electrode fractures (3) or electrode adapter malfunction (2), inadequate signal from endocardial rate-sensing electrodes (3), superior vena cava or right ventricular coil migration (5), failure to correct tachyarrhythmias due to a postimplant rise in defibrillation threshold (5), or pulse generator failure (3). One of these patients required system removal for infection after revision of an endocardial lead. A further 32 patients received inappropriate shocks for atrial fibrillation with a rapid ventricular response or sinus tachycardia. Two of these patients also received shocks for ventricular tachycardia initiated by antitachycardia pacing triggered by atrial fibrillation. Ventricular pacing for bradycardia was associated with inappropriate shocks due to excessive autogain in 2 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the major diagnostic and therapeutic advantages of tiered-therapy ICDs, a significant proportion of patients continue to experience hardware-related complications or receive inappropriate shocks.

Benefits of treatment with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators in patients with stable ventricular tachycardia without cardiac arrest

BACKGROUND

The availability of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD) that are capable of antitachycardia pacing may lead to an increased use of ICDs in patients with haemodynamically tolerated ventricular tachycardia without a history of cardiac arrest. The frequency of potentially life-threatening fast ventricular tachycardias (cycle length < 250 ms) was investigated in patients who had a third generation ICD with endocardial leads implanted because they had haemodynamically tolerated ventricular tachycardia without a history of cardiac arrest.

METHODS

Between January 1990 and October 1993, 50 patients (age (mean (SD)) 60 (11); ejection fraction 39 (16)%; 82% with coronary artery disease and 8% with dilated cardiomyopathy) with haemodynamically tolerated ventricular tachycardia (cycle length (mean (SD)) 348 (60) ms; range 250-500 ms) and without a history of cardiac arrest were treated with third generation ICDs that were capable of antitachycardia pacing. Fast ventricular tachycardia had been induced in 14 (28%) during baseline electrophysiological study. The benefit of ICD treatment was estimated as the difference between total mortality and the occurrence of fast ventricular tachycardia that would have been fatal if it had not been terminated.

RESULTS

During follow up of 17 (12) months, 33 patients (66%) had a total of 3861 episodes of ventricular tachycardia. 91% of these episodes were terminated by antitachycardia pacing. 11 patients (22%) had episodes of potentially life-threatening fast ventricular tachycardia and 3 of these also had inducible fast ventricular tachycardia. One patient died suddenly 27 months after implantation. The difference between survival without fast ventricular tachycardia and total mortality was 9%, 12%, 27%, and 27% at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

About a fifth of patients who had been given an ICD to treat haemodynamically tolerated ventricular tachycardia and who had no history of cardiac arrest experienced fast ventricular tachycardia during follow up requiring immediate cardioversion. Prospective studies are needed to investigate whether the prognosis of patients with a history of haemodynamically tolerated ventricular tachycardia without cardiac arrest is improved by ICD therapy.

Arrhythmias after cardioverter-defibrillator implantation: comparison of epicardial and transvenous systems

Surgery for implantable cardioverter-defibrillators can cause postoperative exacerbation of ventricular and atrial arrhythmias. It is not known whether the techniques of electrode implantation (epicardial vs transvenous) influence the incidence of arrhythmia exacerbation. We reviewed the postoperative course of 229 consecutive patients who received either epicardial (n = 119) or transvenous (n = 110) implantations from 1984 to 1994. Exacerbation of ventricular tachycardia (VT) was defined as an increase in the number of sustained VTs during the postoperative versus the preoperative 2 weeks. Of the entire cohort, 18 patients (8%) developed exacerbation of VT after operation, which was more frequent in patients with epicardial than with transvenous implantations (12% vs 4%, p < 0.03, odds ratio 3.5, 95% confidence interval 1.0 to 13.2). New-onset atrial fibrillation occurred in 15% of patients with epicardial versus 1% of those with transvenous implantations (p = 0.00005, odds ratio 19.4, 95% confidence interval 2.7 to 86.7). These differences persisted after excluding patients with concurrent cardiac surgery. Preoperative occurrence of arrhythmias was the strongest independent predictor for postoperative occurrence (p < 0.01 for VT, p < 0.0001 for atrial fibrillation). Epicardial implantation (p = 0.03) and a history of myocardial infarction (p = 0.04) were independent predictors for postoperative VT exacerbation, whereas epicardial implantation (p < 0.05) and concurrent coronary bypass surgery (p = 0.0001) were independent predictors for postoperative new atrial fibrillation. Perioperative discontinuation of antiarrhythmic drugs did not influence postoperative VT exacerbation. Epicardial implantation was associated with longer length of hospital stay than transvenous implantation (p = 0.0005), independent of age, left ventricular ejection fraction, and concurrent cardiac surgery.

Improved defibrillation threshold with a new epicardial carbon electrode compared with a standard epicardial titanium patch

BACKGROUND

Recent studies show that depending on the type of shock morphology used, 5% to 15% of patients requiring implantable defibrillators cannot be treated with a nonthoracotomy system. In these cases, an epicardial patch-based system becomes necessary. In this study, we investigated a newly developed epicardial carbon electrode as an alternative to a standard epicardial titanium patch.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A tubular epicardial braided carbon electrode of 7F diameter and 14-cm length applied in a U-shape to the epicardium was compared with a standard left ventricular epicardial 15-cm2 titanium mesh patch (CPI Inc). As cathode, a CPI endocardial lead, a Medtronic lead, or a carbon-platinum-iridium prototype electrode was used. Ventricular fibrillation was induced with a 60-Hz generator and allowed to continue for 10 seconds before a shock was given. Two different biphasic shock waveforms (3.2/2- and 6/6-millisecond) were delivered by the six electrode configurations. Eight dogs (weight, 24.5 +/- 1.3 kg) underwent an up-down defibrillation protocol. The order of testing the epicardial electrodes, the endocardial cathodes, and the waveform was randomized. With the epicardial carbon electrode, the mean defibrillation threshold (DFT) energy decreased 39% to 56% and the voltage decreased 24% to 35% compared with the titanium patch: from 8.3 +/- 2.5 to 4.9 +/- 3.6 J with the CPI lead and the 3.2/2-millisecond waveform, from 6.2 +/- 2.5 to 2.9 +/- 2.1 J with the carbon-platinum-iridium prototype, and from 6.4 +/- 3.4 J to 3.5 +/- 2.6 J with the Medtronic lead (P < or = .05). The DFT determinations with the 6/6-millisecond biphasic waveform showed a similar trend with slightly higher values.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with a titanium patch, the new braided epicardial electrode significantly decreases the defibrillation energy requirements. This effect can be maximized by using an endocardial carbon-platinum-iridium prototype as cathode and a short duration biphasic waveform.

Subpectoral implantation of ICD generators: long-term follow-up

A nonthoracotomy surgical approach using an endocardial electrode and combined implantation of a subcutaneous patch and the implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) generator in a subpectoral pocket has been described. We report the long-term follow-up results in patients undergoing implantation using this approach. The patient population consisted of 28 patients (22 men and 6 women) with a mean age of 59 +/- 12 years. The underlying heart disease consisted of coronary artery disease in 20 patients and dilated cardiomyopathy in 8 patients. Sustained ventricular tachycardia was the mode of presentation in 16 patients and sudden cardiac death in 12 patients. The mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 31% +/- 6%. The lead system consisted of an 8 French bipolar passive fixation rate sensing lead positioned at the right ventricular apex, an 11 French spring coil electrode positioned at the superior vena cava-right atrial junction (surface area 700 mm2), and submuscular placement of a large patch (surface area 28 cm2) on the anterolateral chest wall near the cardiac apex via a submammary incision. A defibrillation threshold of < or = 15 joules (J) was required for implantation. This criterion was not satisfied in five patients; thus, a limited thoracotomy was performed via the submammary incision, and the large patch was placed epicardially. The mean R wave amplitude was 12 +/- 3 mV, the mean pacing threshold was 1.0 +/- 0.5 V at 0.5 msec, and the mean defibrillation threshold was 12.6 +/- 3 J. ICD generators implanted were the Ventak-P in 17, PCD-7217 in 5, and the Cadence V-100 in 6 patients.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Management of electrical instability after ICD implantation

Postoperative ventricular arrhythmias were studied in 52 patients receiving implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs). A group of 9 patients was identified who experienced electrical instability (EI). The lead approach was thoracotomy in 6 and nonthoracotomy in 3 patients. In 8 of 9 patients VTs started soon after surgery. There was no evidence of ischemia, cardiac failure, electrolyte imbalance, or drug intoxication. The severity of ventricular arrhythmias varied from a considerable increase in incidence of well-tolerated VTs in 3 patients (1 incessant) to poorly tolerated frequent VTs in 6 patients (2 incessant). In 4 patients VTs led to cardiac failure. Ventricular arrhythmias during EI were refractory to antiarrhythmic drugs (AAD) in 7 of 9 patients. In 3 patients VTs accelerated into fast VT or VF with antitachycardia pacing (ATP) or cardioversion. The successful management of EI was: sedation in 4 patients (3 with midazolam 1 with temazepam), ATP and AAD in 2 patients, AAD and hemodynamic support in 2 patients, spontaneous resolution in 1 patient. All patients survived the period of postoperative EI. Two patients had a relapse of EI at 2- and 9-months postimplantation, respectively, one of whom eventually died.

CONCLUSIONS

EI occurred in 17% of patients after ICD implantation, had a varying degree of severity and required an individualized approach. Control of EI with AAD was successful in only 2 of 9 patients. Sedation with midazolam was useful in the management of EI.

Comparison and frequency of ventricular arrhythmias after defibrillator implantation by thoracotomy versus nonthoracotomy approaches

Postoperative exacerbation of ventricular arrhythmias has been reported in some patients treated with thoracotomy implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs). This phenomenon, which may be related to epicardial patch electrodes, may be less frequent after nonthoracotomy ICD implantation. In this nonrandomized study, postoperative arrhythmias in thoracotomy approaches (n = 52) were compared with those in nonthoracotomy approaches (n = 59). Preoperatively, all patients were clinically stable receiving an antiarrhythmic regimen chosen by serial drug testing. Nine of 52 patients in the thoracotomy group developed sustained ventricular tachycardia postoperatively while receiving the same antiarrhythmic regimen chosen preoperatively, and 1 patient eventually died. Two additional patients developed frequent and prolonged episodes of nonsustained ventricular tachycardia requiring changes in the antiarrhythmic regimen. In the nonthoracotomy group, only 3 of 59 patients developed sustained ventricular tachycardia and 1 developed frequent nonsustained ventricular tachycardia. Thus, only 4 of 59 patients in the nonthoracotomy group developed clinically significant ventricular arrhythmia during the postoperative period compared with 11 of 52 patients in the thoracotomy group (p < 0.05). Surgical mortality was 6% in the thoracotomy group, and 0% in the nonthoracotomy group. In the remaining clinically stable patients, a marked (sevenfold) increase in asymptomatic ventricular arrhythmias was noted in 15 of 39 patients in the thoracotomy group, and in 3 of 55 patients in the nonthoracotomy group (p < 0.05). Thus, postoperative exacerbation of ventricular arrhythmia, sometimes noted with thoracotomy approaches, is very rare with nonthoracotomy approaches.

Implantation of an automatic defibrillator using a new nonthoracotomy approach

Most current nonthoracotomy systems for defibrillator implantation use monophasic devices. To determine the safety and efficacy of a new nonthoracotomy lead configuration when used in conjunction with a device that used biphasic waveforms, 38 consecutive patients were taken to the operating room for implantation of a Cadence tiered therapy defibrillator system. The lead system consisted of a transvenous coil electrode positioned at the right atrial-superior vena caval junction, a bipolar endocardial right ventricular lead, and a large patch placed subcutaneously near the cardiac apex. Of the 38 nonthoracotomy defibrillator implantations attempted, 36 (95%) were completed with adequate defibrillation thresholds. The mean defibrillation threshold in these 36 patients was < or = 563 +/- 10 V (< or = 20 +/- 1 J). There was no perioperative mortality. Complications included coil lead migration (5), sensing lead migration (1), infection (3), pneumothorax (2), arterial embolism (1), and folding of the subcutaneous patch with an increase in defibrillation threshold (1). No patient died during a median follow-up period of 22 weeks. Fourteen patients (39%) had spontaneous sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias, which were all successfully terminated by the implanted device. Shocks for nonsustained arrhythmias were aborted in eight patients (22%). Spurious discharges for sinus tachycardia or atrial fibrillation occurred in six patients (17%) and were readily diagnosed by examination of the stored electrograms. Thus, implantation of a biphasic tiered therapy defibrillator system using this nonthoracotomy approach is feasible in the majority of patients. The major complication associated with this procedure is lead dislodgment.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Nonthoracotomy- versus thoracotomy-implantable defibrillators. Intention-to-treat comparison of clinical outcomes

BACKGROUND

Nonthoracotomy-implantable cardioverter/defibrillator (ICD) systems may represent a significant advance in the treatment of patients with life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias, but their merits relative to those of the well-established thoracotomy systems remain largely unknown. The objective of this study was to compare the short- and long-term clinical outcomes after attempted ICD implantation via a nonthoracotomy versus thoracotomy approach in similar groups of patients.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Between September 1990 and December 1992, 212 consecutive patients underwent attempted ICD system implantation without concomitant cardiac surgery at a single institution. Approach selection was not randomized but rather was based primarily on hardware availability. Primary comparisons of short- and long-term outcome were performed according to the "intention-to-treat" principle. Implantation was attempted via a nonthoracotomy approach in 120 patients (57%) and via a thoracotomy approach in 92 patients (43%). Prior cardiac surgery was more prevalent in the nonthoracotomy patients; otherwise, groups did not differ significantly in terms of prognostically relevant clinical characteristics. Nonthoracotomy implantation was successful in 101 patients (84%). After crossover to thoracotomy implantation (14 patients), the eventual success rate for ICD system implantation was 96% in the nonthoracotomy group. Thoracotomy implantation was successful in 89 patients (97%). Operative mortality was 3.3% in the nonthoracotomy and 4.3% in the thoracotomy groups (P = .73). Nonthoracotomy group patients were less likely to experience postoperative congestive heart failure (6% versus 16%; P = .02) or supraventricular arrhythmia (6% versus 18%; P = .004) and had significantly shorter postoperative intensive care and total hospitalization. Total hospital costs were significantly lower in the nonthoracotomy group ($32,205 versus $37,265; P = .001). After a follow-up of 16 +/- 9 months, there were 17 deaths in the nonthoracotomy group (none sudden) and 12 deaths in the thoracotomy group (1 sudden). One- and 2-year Kaplan-Meier survival probabilities were .87 (95% CI, .78 to .91) and .80 (95% CI, .68 to .88) in the nonthoracotomy group and .90 (95% CI, .82 to .95) and .87 (95% CI, .77 to .93) in the thoracotomy group (P = .56; log-rank test).

CONCLUSIONS

Nonthoracotomy ICD implantation is associated with reduced surgical morbidity, postoperative hospital care requirement, and hospital costs and has similar efficacy in preventing sudden death relative to the thoracotomy approach. From these nonrandomized data, it appears that a nonthoracotomy approach should be considered preferable in most patients requiring ICD therapy.

Electrophysiological laboratory, electrophysiologist-implanted, nonthoracotomy-implantable cardioverter/defibrillators

BACKGROUND

Implantable cardioverter/defibrillators (ICDs) have conventionally been implanted in the operating room by surgeons. However, technological developments have reduced size and increased simplicity, bringing the procedure into the realm of the electrophysiologist. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of implantation of the entire ICD system by electrophysiologists in an electrophysiology laboratory.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Between July 1993 and February 1994, 23 patients (21 men; age, 64 +/- 11 years) underwent transvenous ICD implantation by electrophysiologists working alone, entirely in the electrophysiology laboratory. Indications for ICD were sudden death in 10 patients, uncontrolled life-threatening ventricular tachycardia in 12, and syncope with cardiomyopathy and familial sudden death in 1. Seventeen patients had coronary artery disease and a past history of acute myocardial infarction. Four patients had idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy, 1 had coronary ectasia and poor left ventricular function, and another had poor left ventricular function related to valvular dysfunction. The mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 34 +/- 10% (range, 20% to 50%). General anesthesia was administered in 22 cases, and deep sedation was used in 1 elderly patient. After positioning of transvenous leads and subcutaneous patch/array lead positioning, defibrillation testing was performed. After transvenous and subcutaneous lead tunneling, all generators were placed subcutaneously in an abdominal pocket. The mean total time in the electrophysiology laboratory was 254 +/- 68 minutes (range, 150 to 375 minutes), with 104 +/- 42 minutes for anesthetic and other preparation, 159 +/- 45 minutes for implantation, and 8.7 +/- 5 minutes (range, 3 to 25 minutes) of fluoroscopy required for positioning of transvenous and subcutaneous lead systems. Implant times showed a significant improvement when the first 10 cases (188 +/- 44 minutes) were compared with the last 10 in the series (124 +/- 44 minutes, P < .01). The mean defibrillation threshold was 17 +/- 5 J (range, 5 to 25 J). There were 5 complications (22%): 1 patch-site hematoma, 1 pneumothorax related to subclavian venous puncture, 1 pulmonary embolism, and 2 patients requiring overnight ventilation after hemodynamic deterioration following defibrillation testing. There were no deaths, and there were no infections. The mean time to hospital discharge after the implant was 5.1 +/- 3.5 days. After 11.6 +/- 9 weeks of follow-up, all devices were functioning satisfactorily, all patients had successfully defibrillated at postimplant predischarge checkup with 29 +/- 5 J, and there had been no late complications.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first report to show that nonthoracotomy ICD implantation may be successfully carried out by electrophysiologists working alone in the electrophysiology laboratory, with a high rate of success and few complications, even in high-risk patients. This high rate of success and safety probably relates to the availability of high-quality fluoroscopy and familiarity with electrophysiology laboratory equipment and personnel.

Perioperative complications of cardioverter-defibrillator implantation: the Emory experience

Over a 5-year period, 110 cardioverter-defibrillators (109 epicardial, 1 transvenous) were implanted consecutively in selected patients with ventricular tachyarrhythmias. The perioperative course of this patient population was examined to determine the associated morbidity and mortality of the procedure. Patients were predominantly male, with coronary artery disease and a decreased left ventricular ejection fraction. Most underwent median sternotomy for implantable cardioverter defibrillator implantation. The incidence of perioperative mortality was found to be 2.7%. New-onset atrial fibrillation or flutter occurred in 17.3% of the patients during the postoperative period and aggravation of ventricular tachyarrhythmias in 19.1%. The ICD system became infected in 2.7% of the patients and the mediastinal incision site infected in 2.4%. Pneumonia developed in 4.5%. Other complications included significant blood loss, ICD pocket hematomas, and lead dislodgement. There is an appreciable incidence of morbidity and mortality associated with ICD implantation.

A simplified, single-lead unipolar transvenous cardioversion-defibrillation system

BACKGROUND

Transvenous implantable cardioverter-defibrillators provide significant advantages in the treatment of patients with life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias. However, present technology requires considerable electrophysiology expertise, multiple incisions, and long operative times for successful implementation.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In this study, we present a prototype of a new, easy-to-insert unipolar transvenous defibrillation system that has the reliability of epicardial defibrillation but the ease of pacemaker insertion. This system incorporates a single anodal right ventricular defibrillation electrode using a 65% tilt biphasic pulse delivered to a 108-cm2 surface area pulse generator titanium alloy shell as an active cathode placed in a left infraclavicular pocket. Testing of this system was performed before implantation of a standard nonthoracotomy-transvenous defibrillation system in 40 consecutive patients with a history of ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation. The simplified unipolar single-lead system resulted in a defibrillation threshold of 9.3 +/- 6.0 J with 37 of 40 patients (93%) having a defibrillation threshold of less than 20 J. Moreover, the unipolar defibrillation system was efficiently used requiring only 3.4 +/- 0.8 ventricular fibrillation inductions to measure the defibrillation threshold and 100 +/- 28 minutes to implement.

CONCLUSIONS

This new unipolar transvenous defibrillation system is as simple to insert as a pacemaker, requires few ventricular fibrillation inductions, demands less technical expertise, and provides defibrillation at energy levels comparable to that reported with epicardial lead systems. It should substantially reduce the morbidity, time, and cost of defibrillator implantation.

Hemodynamic changes due to intraoperative testing of the automatic implantable cardioverter defibrillator: implications for anesthesia management

During the insertion of an automatic implantable cardioverter defibrillator, repeated induction of ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation and subsequent defibrillation is performed to determine the defibrillation threshold. In this study, the influence of these testing episodes on myocardial function was investigated in 13 patients under general anesthesia. Preoperative ejection fraction (EF) was 41 (14 to 84) % (median and range). Testing was performed 3 (2-5) times. During these testing episodes the patients received a total of 4 (2-8) countershocks. Patients with a preoperative EF < 30% (N = 5) showed a significant reduction of cardiac index (CI) from 2.2 (1.5-3.3) L/min/m2 before testing to 1.5 (1.3-2.3) L/min/m2 after the last testing episode, and of left ventricular stroke work index (LVSWI) from 32 (14-53) g.m/m2 before testing to 22 (7-43) after the last testing episode. These changes were not related to the total fibrillation time or the cumulative defibrillation energy. Patients with a preoperative EF > 30% (N = 8) showed no significant changes of CI (2.15 [1.8-3.0] L/min/m2 v 2.15 [1.7-3.0] L/min/m2) or LVSWI (35 [28-48] g.m/m2 v 33.5 [27-52] g.m/m2). Comparison of the two patient groups revealed similar hemodynamic baseline values, but significant differences in LVSWI after the last testing episode. Defibrillation testing may produce a further reduction in myocardial performance in patients with preexisting poor cardiac function.

Do patients with an implantable defibrillator live longer?

OBJECTIVES

This study was done to provide information on the potential benefit of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy regarding sudden and arrhythmia-related deaths and to examine whether such therapy improves survival.

BACKGROUND

Implantation of automatic cardioverter-defibrillators is reported to abort sudden cardiac death due to malignant tachyarrhythmias.

METHODS

Between 1989 and 1992, 107 patients were screened for implantation of a third-generation implantable cardioverter-defibrillator combined with endocardial leads. Mean age was 57 +/- 13 years and mean ejection fraction was 40 +/- 15%. Sudden death, total arrhythmia-related death and total cardiac death were compared with the occurrence of fast ventricular tachyarrhythmias (> 240 beats/min), assuming that most of these arrhythmias would have been fatal without treatment by the implantable cardioverter-defibrillator.

RESULTS

The surgical mortality rate was 2.7% in all 107 patients and 1% in the 99 patients who qualified for endocardial leads. During a follow-up period of 12 +/- 8 months, actuarial survival rate free of events at 6 months as well as at 12 and 18 months was 100% for sudden death, 97% for total arrhythmia-related death and 95% for total cardiac death. In contrast, after 6, 12 and 18 months, the rate of survival free of fast ventricular tachycardia was only 83%, 74% and 69%, respectively, and the rate of survival free of any ventricular tachyarrhythmia was only 59%, 49% and 40%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The outcome of patients treated with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator and endocardial defibrillation leads is excellent. For many patients, this treatment is probably lifesaving.

Comparison of frequency of aggravation of ventricular tachyarrhythmias after implantation of automatic defibrillators using epicardial versus nonthoracotomy lead systems

The time of onset of 4,471 episodes of ventricular tachycardia (VT) or fibrillation (VF) in 40 of 65 patients with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) with endocardial defibrillation electrodes (group 1) and in 53 of 123 with epicardial defibrillation electrodes (group 2) was analyzed to examine whether the incidence of VT/VF immediately after surgery is greater than during further follow up and whether the site of lead placement exerts an influence on the occurrence of these arrhythmias. Actuarial survival rates free of VT/VF were 77, 65, and 54% at 1, 3 and 6 months, respectively, for group 1, and 84, 66 and 52%, respectively, for group 2. The probability of VT/VF was increased only during the first week after surgery; in that week, 12.8% of all patients had VT/VF, without significant differences between groups 1 and 2. Until the end of the first month, this percentage increased to 23%, whereas only 12 to 15% of patients had VT/VF during subsequent months. In 19 patients with third-generation devices capable of terminating tachycardias by overdrive pacing, 326 of 412 VT/VF episodes occurring in the first week after surgery were terminated by antitachycardia pacing, and only 86 had to be terminated by cardioversion or defibrillation. No postoperative exacerbation of inappropriate ICD therapies was observed in any group; 2 to 5% of patients per month received ICD therapies for atrial fibrillation or sinus tachycardia. Patients who received appropriate ICD therapies in the first week after surgery were at high risk of recurrence of VT/VF.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Implantable transvenous cardioverter-defibrillators

BACKGROUND

Implantable transvenous cardioverter-defibrillators offer a significant opportunity to decrease procedural morbidity and medical costs in the care of patients with life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias who otherwise would have required a sternotomy or thoracotomy for device insertion. The purpose of this study was to examine prospectively the safety, efficacy, and limitations associated with the use of a transvenously implanted, tiered-therapy cardioverter-defibrillator with antitachycardia pacing function in a consecutive population of 84 ventricular fibrillation (VF) and sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) survivors.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The index arrhythmia promoting transvenous cardioverter-defibrillator implantation was VF in 41 patients, VT in 27, and both VF and VT in 16. In each patient, transvenous defibrillation via a coronary sinus, a right ventricular, a superior vena caval, and/or a subcutaneous chest patch lead system was attempted. The pulsing methods used include two-electrode single-pathway pulsing or three-electrode dual-pathway simultaneous or sequential pulsing. A transvenous cardioverter-defibrillator was inserted if the defibrillation threshold (DFT) was < or = 20 J. Successful implantation of a transvenous cardioverter-defibrillator was possible in 80 of 84 (95%) patients. The mean implant DFT was 10.9 +/- 4.8 J. After cardioverter-defibrillator implantation, all patients were extubated in the operating room and sent to a standard telemetry ward for monitoring. No patient suffered a postoperative pulmonary complication or perioperative flurry of cardiac arrhythmias. Postoperative complications included lead dislodgments in eight, transient long thoracic nerve injury in one, asymptomatic left subclavian vein occlusion in two, asymptomatic small pericardial effusion in one, subcutaneous patch pocket hematomas in four, pulse generator pocket infection in one, and lead fracture in one. As experience was gained with the procedure, it was routine to discharge patients 3 days after surgery. The mean hospital stay was 6.0 +/- 2.4 days. Upon discharge, all patients returned to their prehospital activities including those with complications except for the patient with a pocket infection, who required intravenous antibiotic therapy. Patient survival using an intention-to-treat analysis was 98% over an 11 +/- 7-month follow-up period. During this time period, 31 of the 80 patients (39%) with transvenous lead systems were successfully treated by their device for sustained VT or VF. Antitachycardia pacing was used in 424 episodes of monomorphic VT and was successful in 371 (88%). All episodes of VF were aborted by the device. Antiarrhythmic drugs were used after device implantation in only eight of 80 patients (10%).

CONCLUSIONS

Transvenous cardioverter-defibrillator implantation is practical in most candidates. Implant DFTs are usually low, surgical morbidity and postoperative complications are modest, therapy of VT and VF is efficient, and survival is excellent.

Risks of developing supraventricular and ventricular tachyarrhythmias after implantation of a cardioverter-defibrillator, and timing the activation of arrhythmia termination therapies

The clinical courses of 39 consecutive recipients (mean age 61 +/- 12 years, and mean left ventricular ejection fraction 0.32 +/- 0.15) of an automatic implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) were examined to determine the risks of developing ventricular tachycardia (VT) and supraventricular tachyarrhythmias (SVT) after surgery, with ventricular response rates fulfilling ICD detection criteria. ICD system leads were implanted by thoracotomy in 25 patients and by using nonthoracotomy lead systems in 14. Six patients (18%) developed SVT after surgery, whereas 14 (36%) developed sustained VT. The median times to the development of both SVT and VT were 2 days. By actuarial analysis, the probability of developing VT after surgery was significantly greater than that of SVT during hospitalization (p = 0.04). This significant excess of postoperative VT over SVT was most marked in patients aged < or = 61 years, those who received nonthoracotomy rather than epicardial lead systems, those who presented with VT rather than ventricular fibrillation, and those who received > 20 intraoperative defibrillation shocks. These observations recommend the activation of ICD therapies immediately after implantation.

Initial experience with transvenous implantable cardioverter defibrillator lead systems: operative morbidity and mortality

Introduction of non-thoracotomy lead systems (Medtronic, Inc.) for the implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) has expanded the indications for use of this mode of therapy. Patients previously considered "too ill" to undergo a thoracotomy as well as patients who are at a high risk for developing sudden death but without previous cardiac arrest, are now considered candidates. The initial experience with the non-thoracotomy lead system at our institution was analyzed for morbidity and mortality. Thirty-four patients underwent attempted intravascular lead implantation, with 30 having initial successful implantation (88.2%). There were 23 males; average ejection fraction (EF) was 38.6%. Three patients developed pulmonary edema and low output immediately after the procedure. Three patients developed electromechanical dissociation during defibrillation threshold testing. A prolonged testing time for the non-thoracotomy lead system was noted when compared to the thoracotomy system (57.39 vs 32.30 min; P < 0.0000). There were more intraoperative morbidities with the non-thoracotomy leads than with the thoracotomy system. There were no perioperative deaths. The potential consequences of prolonged anesthesia time and extensive defibrillation threshold testing should be considered when choosing the route of ICD implant, the type of anesthesia, and the intraoperative testing protocol for each patient.