Flow dependence of measures of aortic stenosis severity during exercise

A Novel Echocardiographic Parameter to Confirm Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis Severity

Background

In patients with low-gradient (LG) aortic stenosis (AS), confirming disease severity and indication of intervention often requires dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) or aortic valve calcium scoring by computed tomography. We hypothesized that the mean transvalvular pressure gradient to effective orifice area ratio (MG/EOA, in mm Hg/cm2) measured during rest echocardiography identifies true-severe AS (TSAS) and is associated with clinical outcomes in patients with low-flow, LG-AS.

Objectives

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic and prognostic value of MG/EOA ratio.

Methods

The diagnostic accuracy of MG/EOA ratio to identify TSAS was retrospectively assessed in: 1) an in vitro data set obtained in a circulatory model including 93 experimental conditions; and 2) an in vivo data set of 188 patients from the TOPAS (True or Pseudo-Severe Aortic Stenosis) study (NCT01835028). Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to assess the diagnostic accuracy of MG/EOA ratio for identifying TSAS, and Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were performed to assess its association with clinical outcomes.

Results

The optimal cutoff of MG/EOA ratio to identify TSAS in patients with low-flow, LG-AS was ≥25 mm Hg/cm2 (correct classification 85%), as well as in vitro (100%). During a median follow-up of 1.41 ± 0.75 years, 146 (78%) patients met the composite endpoint of aortic valve replacement or all-cause mortality. A MG/EOA ratio ≥25 mm Hg/cm2 was independently associated with an increased risk of the composite endpoint (adjusted HR: 2.36 [95% CI: 1.63-3.42], P < 0.001). The Harell's C-index of MG/EOA was 0.68, equaling projected EOA (0.67) measured by DSE.

Conclusions

MG/EOA ratio can be useful in low-flow, LG-AS to confirm AS severity and may complement DSE or aortic valve calcium scoring.

Reducing Left Ventricular Wall Stress through Aortic Valve Enlargement via Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in Severe Aortic Stenosis

Background: In aortic stenosis, the left ventricle exerts additional force to pump blood through the narrowed aortic valve into the downstream arterial vasculature. Adaptive hypertrophy helps to maintain wall stress homeostasis but at the expense of impaired compliance. Advanced ventricular deformation impacts the extent of functional recovery benefits achieved through transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Methods and Results: Subgroups were stratified based on output, with low-flow severe aortic stenosis defined as stroke volume index <35 mL· m-2. Before intervention, the low-flow subgroup exhibited worse effective orifice area index and arterial and global impedance, along with thinner wall thickness and larger chamber volume marginally. LV performance, including stroke volume index, ventricular elastance, and ventricular-arterial coupling, were notably inferior, consistent with worse adverse remodeling. Although the effective orifice area index was similarly augmented after TAVI, inferior recovery benefits were noted. Persistently higher wall stress and energy consumption were observed, along with poorer ventricular-arterial coupling. These changes in wall stress showed an inverse relationship with alterations in wall thickness and were proportional to changes in dimension and volume. Additionally, they were proportional to changes in left ventricular end-systolic pressure, pressure-volume area, and ventricular-arterial coupling but inversely related to ventricular end-systolic elastance. Conclusions: The study revealed that aortic valve enlargement through transcatheter aortic valve implantation reduces left ventricular wall stress in severe aortic stenosis. The reduced recovery benefits in the low-flow subgroup were evident. Wall stress could serve as a marker of mechanical benefit after the intervention.

Improving accuracy in diagnosing aortic stenosis severity: An in-depth analysis of echocardiographic measurement error through literature review and simulation study

AIMS

The present guidelines advise replacing the aortic valve for individuals with severe aortic stenosis (AS) based on various echocardiographic parameters. Accurate measurements are essential to avoid misclassification and unnecessary interventions. The objective of this study was to evaluate the influence of measurement error on the echocardiographic evaluation of the severity of AS.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A systematic review was performed to examine whether measurement errors are reported in studies focusing on the prognostic value of peak aortic jet velocity (Vmax ), mean pressure gradient (MPG), and effective orifice area (EOA) in asymptomatic patients with AS. Out of the 37 studies reviewed, 17 (46%) acknowledged the existence of measurement errors, but none of them utilized methods to address them. Secondly, the magnitude of potential errors was collected from available literature for use in clinical simulations. Interobserver variability ranged between 0.9% and 8.3% for Vmax and MPG but was higher for EOA (range 7.7%-12.7%), indicating lower reliability. Assuming a circular left ventricular outflow tract area led to a median underestimation of EOA by 23% compared to planimetry by other modalities. A clinical simulation resulted in the reclassification of 42% of patients, shifting them from a diagnosis of severe AS to moderate AS.

CONCLUSIONS

Measurement errors are underreported in studies on echocardiographic assessment of AS severity. These errors can lead to misclassification and misdiagnosis. Clinicians and scientists should be aware of the implications for accurate clinical decision-making and assuring research validity.

The Impact of Left Ventricular Performance and Afterload on the Evaluation of Aortic Valve Stenosis: A 1D Mathematical Modeling Approach

The transaortic valvular pressure gradient (TPG) plays a central role in decision-making for patients suffering from severe aortic stenosis. However, the flow-dependence nature of the TPG makes the diagnosis of aortic stenosis challenging since the markers of cardiac performance and afterload present high physiological interdependence and thus, isolated effects cannot be measured directly in vivo. We used a validated 1D mathematical model of the cardiovascular system, coupled with a model of aortic stenosis, to assess and quantify the independent effect of the main left ventricular performance parameters (end-systolic (Ees) and end-diastolic (Eed) elastance) and principal afterload indices (total vascular resistance (TVR) and total arterial compliance (TAC)) on the TPG for different levels of aortic stenosis. In patients with critical aortic stenosis (aortic valve area (AVA) ≤ 0.6 cm2), a 10% increase of Eed from the baseline value was associated with the most important effect on the TPG (-5.6 ± 0.5 mmHg, p < 0.001), followed by a similar increase of Ees (3.4 ± 0.1 mmHg, p < 0.001), in TAC (1.3 ±0.2 mmHg, p < 0.001) and TVR (-0.7 ± 0.04 mmHg, p < 0.001). The interdependence of the TPG left ventricular performance and afterload indices become stronger with increased aortic stenosis severity. Disregarding their effects may lead to an underestimation of stenosis severity and a potential delay in therapeutic intervention. Therefore, a comprehensive evaluation of left ventricular function and afterload should be performed, especially in cases of diagnostic challenge, since it may offer the pathophysiological mechanism that explains the mismatch between aortic severity and the TPG.

Impact of Concomitant Mitral Regurgitation on the Hemodynamic Indicators of Aortic Stenosis

Background In patients with aortic stenosis (AS), the presence of mitral regurgitation (MR) can lead to underestimation of AS severity and worse clinical outcomes. The objective of this study was to characterize the magnitude of the effects of concomitant MR on hemodynamic indicators of AS severity using clinical data and a computational cardiovascular simulation. Methods and Results Echocardiographic data from 1427 patients with severe AS were used to inform a computational cardiovascular system model, and varying degrees of MR and AS were simulated. Hemodynamic data, including left ventricular and aortic pressure waveforms, were generated for all simulations. Simulated reduction in mean transaortic pressure gradient (MPG) associated with MR was then used to calculate the adjusted MPG in the clinical cohort. MR was present in 861 (60%) patients. Compared with patients without MR, patients with MR had a lower aortic-valve area (0.83±0.2 cm2 versus 0.75±0.2; P<0.001) and were more likely to have a low-gradient pattern (MPG <40 mm Hg) (45% versus 54%; P<0.001). Simulations showed that the presence of concomitant mild, moderate, and severe MR with AS was accompanied by a mean reduction in MPG of 10%, 29%, and 40%, respectively. For patients with MR, their calculated adjusted MPG was on average 24% higher than their MPG (52±22 versus 42±16 mm Hg). Of the 467 patients with low-gradient AS and MR, 240 (51%) would reclassify as high gradient based on their adjusted MPG. Conclusions Concomitant MR results in lower MPG and reduced forward flow compared with isolated AS. Careful quantitation of MR should be factored into the assessment of AS severity to mitigate for potential underestimation.

Arterial Wave Reflection and Aortic Valve Stenosis: Diagnostic Challenges and Prognostic Significance

Introduction

Arterial wave reflection is an important component of the left ventricular afterload, affecting both pressure and flow to the aorta. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the impact of wave reflection on transvalvular pressure gradients (TPG), a key parameter for the evaluation of aortic valve stenosis (AS), as well as its prognostic significance in patients with AS undergoing a transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR).

Materials and Methods

The study population consisted of 351 patients with AS (mean age 84 ± 6 years, 43% males) who underwent a complete hemodynamic evaluation before the TAVR. The baseline assessment included right and left heart catheterization, transthoracic echocardiography, and a thorough evaluation of the left ventricular afterload by means of wave separation analysis. The cohort was divided into quartiles according to the transit time of the backward pressure wave (BWTT). Primary endpoint was all-cause mortality at 1 year.

Results

Early arrival of the backward pressure wave was related to lower cardiac output (Q1: 3.7 ± 0.9 lt/min vs Q4: 4.4 ± 1.0 lt/min, p &lt; 0.001) and higher aortic systolic blood pressure (Q1: 132 ± 26 mmHg vs Q4: 117 ± 26 mmHg, p &lt; 0.001). TPG was significantly related to the BWTT, patients in the arrival group exhibiting the lowest TPG (mean TPG, Q1: 37.6 ± 12.7 mmHg vs Q4: 44.8 ± 14.7 mmHg, p = 0.005) for the same aortic valve area (AVA) (Q1: 0.58 ± 0.35 cm2 vs 0.61 ± 0.22 cm2, p = 0.303). In multivariate analysis, BWTT remained an independent determinant of mean TPG (beta 0.3, p = 0.002). Moreover, the prevalence of low-flow, low-gradient AS with preserved ejection fraction was higher in patients with early arterial reflection arrival (Q1: 33.3% vs Q4: 14.9%, p = 0.033). Finally, patients with early arrival of the reflected wave (Q1) exhibited higher all-cause mortality at 1 year after the TAVR (unadjusted HR: 2.33, 95% CI: 1.17–4.65, p = 0.016).

Conclusion

Early reflected wave arrival to the aortic root is associated with poor prognosis and significant aortic hemodynamic alterations in patients undergoing a TAVR for AS. This is related to a significant decrease in TPG for a given AVA, leading to a possible underestimation of the AS severity.

Predictors of true-severe classical low-flow low-gradient aortic stenosis at resting echocardiography

BACKGROUND

Classical low-flow, low-gradient (LF/LG) aortic stenosis (AS) is subclassified into a true-severe (TS) and a pseudo-severe (PS) subform using low-dose dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE). In clinical practice a resting peak jet velocity (Vmax) >3.5 m/s or a mean transvalvular gradient (MPG) >35 mmHg suggests the presence of TS classical LF/LG AS, but there is no data to support this. The aim of this study was therefore to investigate whether a resting Vmax >3.5 m/s or MPG >35 mmHg reliably predicted diagnosis of TS classical LF/LG AS.

METHODS

One hundred (100) consecutive patients with classical LF/LG AS were prospectively recruited. All patients underwent DSE for subcategorization. The impact of Vmax and MPG for the presence of the TS subform were analyzed.

RESULTS

TS classical LF/LG AS was diagnosed in 72 patients. Resting Vmax and resting MPG predicted true-severity with an ROC-AUC of 0.737 (95%CI: 0.635-0.838; p < 0.001) and 0.725 (95%CI: 0.615-0.834; p < 0.001), respectively. The optimal positive predictive values (PPV) for the diagnosis of TS classical LF/LG AS were obtained with a resting Vmax >3.5 m/s or resting MPG >35 mmHg. In a multivariate logistic regression analysis, Vmax >3.5 m/s was independently associated with a 5.33-fold odds-ratio of TS classical LF/LG AS (OR 5.33; 95%CI: 1.34-21.18, p = 0.018).

CONCLUSIONS

TS classical LF/LG AS can be reliably predicted by a resting Vmax >3.5 m/s or a resting MPG >35 mmHg. Further imaging for subclassification is not needed in this situation.

Contemporary Imaging of Aortic Stenosis

Degenerative or fibrocalcific aortic stenosis (AS) is now the most common native valvular heart disease assessed and managed by cardiologists in developed countries. Transthoracic echocardiography remains the quintessential imaging modality for the non-invasive characterisation of AS due to its widespread availability, superior assessment of flow haemodynamics, and a wealth of prognostic data accumulated over decades of clinical utility and research applications. With expanding technologies and increasing availability of treatment options such as transcatheter aortic valve replacements, in addition to conventional surgical approaches, accurate and precise assessment of AS severity is critical to guide decisions for and timing of interventions. Despite clear guideline echocardiographic parameters demarcating severe AS, discrepancies between transvalvular velocities, gradients, and calculated valve areas are commonly encountered in clinical practice. This often results in diagnostically challenging cases with significant implications. Greater emphasis must be placed on the quality of performance of basic two dimensional (2D) and Doppler measurements (attention to detail ensuring accuracy and precision), incorporating ancillary haemodynamic surrogates, understanding study- or patient-specific confounders, and recognising the role and limitations of stress echocardiography in the subgroups of low-flow low-gradient AS. A multiparametric approach, along with the incorporation of multimodality imaging (cardiac computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging) in certain scenarios, is now mandatory to avoid incorrect misclassification of severe AS. This is essential to ensure appropriate selection of patients who would most benefit from interventions on the aortic valve to relieve the afterload mismatch resulting from truly severe valvular stenosis.

Echocardiographic evaluation of velocity ratio, velocity time integral ratio, and pulmonary valve area in dogs with pulmonary valve stenosis

Background

Velocity ratio, velocity time integral (VTI) ratio, and pulmonary valve area indexed to body surface area (iPVA) are methods of assessment of pulmonary valve stenosis (PS) severity that are less dependent on blood flow. Studies evaluating these methods are limited.

Objectives

To determine the effects of butorphanol, atenolol, and balloon valvuloplasty (BV) on velocity ratio, VTI ratio, iPVA, mean PG, and max PG.

Animals

Twenty‐seven dogs with PS (max PG >50 mm Hg).

Methods

Prospective study. All dogs underwent an echocardiogram at baseline, 5‐minutes after administration of butorphanol (0.2‐0.25 mg/kg IV), and 2‐to‐4 weeks after atenolol (1‐1.5 mg/kg q12h). Twenty‐one of these were evaluated 24‐hours after BV.

Results

There were no significant differences (P > .05) amongst any of the methods of assessment of PS severity after butorphanol. After atenolol, mean (SD) of mean (57.0 [21.0] mm Hg) and max PG (93.1 [33.8] mm Hg) were significantly decreased (P ≤ .047) compared with baseline (65.2 [26.2] mm Hg and 108 [44.4] mm Hg, respectively). After atenolol, there were no significant (P ≥ .12) differences in velocity ratio (0.29 [0.09]), VTI ratio (0.18 [0.05]), or iPVA (0.43 [0.16] cm²/m²) compared with baseline (0.30 [0.09], 0.19 [0.09], 0.44 [0.17] cm²/m², respectively).

Conclusions and Clinical Importance

Atenolol might reduce mean and max PG but does not alter less flow‐dependent methods of assessment of PS severity (velocity ratio, VTI ratio, and iPVA) in dogs with PS. Results support an integrative approach to assessment of PS severity that includes less flow‐dependent methods, particularly in states of altered flow or right ventricular function.

Hemodynamic evaluation of suspected severe aortic stenosis leads to a diagnosis of renal cell carcinoma

The evaluation of aortic stenosis is not always straightforward. When symptoms of severe aortic stenosis are present with supporting Doppler echocardiographic or cardiac catheterization data, replacement of the aortic valve is recommended. Occasionally, Doppler- and catheter-derived data are discordant; appropriate treatment in such cases becomes less clear. We report a case in which a 66-year-old man's symptoms and Doppler data suggested severe aortic stenosis. However, heart catheterization data suggested otherwise, and ultimately it led to the diagnosis of a highly vascular renal tumor. Shunting within the tumor resulted in high cardiac output, which, in combination with a small aortic root, masqueraded as severe aortic stenosis.

Echocardiographic Evaluation of Aortic Stenosis - Normal Flow and Low Flow Scenarios

The echocardiographic evaluation of the patient with aortic stenosis (AS) has evolved in recent years, beyond confirming the diagnosis and measuring the resting mean pressure gradient or valve area. New echocardiographic approaches have developed to address the clinical dilemmas related to discordant haemodynamic data, asymptomatic haemodynamically severe AS and low-flow, low-gradient AS in order to better evaluate the disease severity, enhance the risk stratification of patients and provide important prognostic information. This article reviews the echocardiographic evaluation of the AS patient and focuses on the echocardiographic assessment of the haemodynamic severity, the prediction of clinical outcome and the use of echocardiography to guide patient management in the presence of normal flow and low flow scenarios.

Non-invasive and invasive evaluation of aortic valve area in 100 patients with severe aortic valve stenosis: comparison of cardiac computed tomography with ECHO (transesophageal/transthoracic) and catheter examination

BACKGROUND

Current guidelines place emphasis on the determination of aortic valve area (AVA) for defining an appropriate treatment strategy. Invasive and non-invasive modalities are used to perform planimetric [transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) and cardiac multidetector computed tomography (MDCT)] and calculated [catheter examination (CE), transthoracic echocardiography (TTE)] AVA measurements.

PURPOSE AND METHODS

We investigated 100 patients admitted to evaluate the AVA using cardiac MDCT (CT), TEE/TTE as well as invasive CE.

RESULTS

In all 100 patients we calculated a mean AVA of 0.79±0.29cm(2) (female 50/100, 0.70±0.19cm(2), male 0.9±0.21cm(2)) determined by all investigated examinations (mean±SEM). AVA measurements determined by CT were significantly greater (0.86±0.25cm(2)) than those determined by CE: 0.75±0.18cm(2), p=0.01. Echocardiographically determined AVA was comparable to CE (statistically not significant). Similar results were seen in all patients regardless of gender, presence of atrial fibrillation, and heart rate. We calculated a mean AVA for each patient and evaluated the variance of the AVA determined through investigated specific examinations as the bias. Overall, we found for CT 0.13±0.1cm(2), CE 0.13±0.11cm(2), TEE 0.16±0.09cm(2), and for TTE 0.16±0.08cm(2) a specific statistical non-significant variance. On subgroups: sinus rhythm, atrial fibrillation, females, males or combination, we found no further significant relevance for the specific variance.

CONCLUSION

Our data suggest the feasibility of cardiac MDCT to evaluate the correct AVA regardless of rhythm, heart rate, and sex. The planimetric concept to determine the AVA with CT displaces the "gold-standard" CE with respect to elucidating the potencies for complications, i.e. cerebral stroke. Regardless of CT's accessing of AVA measurement the TTE examination should remain the primary method of screening for aortic valve pathologies.

Hemodynamic patterns for symptomatic presentations of severe aortic stenosis

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to investigate intracardiac hemodynamic idiosyncrasies responsible for various presentations of severe aortic stenosis (AS).

BACKGROUND

Syncope, dyspnea, and chest pain are well-established indications for aortic valve replacement in patients with severe AS. Patients' survival is limited once they develop symptoms from AS, and survival depends on what type of symptoms a patient develops. We hypothesized that there would be a relationship between the type of AS symptoms and intracardiac hemodynamics as well as AS severity.

METHODS

We analyzed 498 patients (men: 58.4%, 66 ± 12 years of age) with severe AS and normal left ventricular ejection fraction from 2003 to 2009 who had comprehensive echocardiography examination for AS. The study population was divided into 4 groups based on presenting symptom(s) (341 in group I, asymptomatic; 15 in group II, syncope; 110 in group III, dyspnea; 32 in group IV, chest pain). Echocardiographic measurements for cardiac structure, function, and intracardiac hemodynamic parameters were compared among these 4 groups.

RESULTS

Mean aortic valve pressure gradient and aortic valve area were 57.1 ± 15.2 mm Hg and 0.74 ± 0.19 cm(2), respectively. AS severity based on mean gradient and aortic valve area was similar among 4 groups. Compared with the asymptomatic group, symptomatic patients were older and had lower cardiac output, and higher E/e' ratio while having a similar aortic valve area and gradient. Group II (syncope) displayed smaller LV dimension, stroke volume, cardiac output, left atrial volume index, and E/e' ratio. Conversely, group III (dyspnea) was found to have the worst diastolic function with largest left atrial volume index and highest E/e' ratio.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with severe AS, their symptoms are often linked to specific hemodynamic patterns associated with AS: smaller left ventricular cavity and reduced output for syncope versus more advanced diastolic dysfunction for dyspnea. Hence, comprehensive intracardiac hemodynamics including diastolic function and stroke volume need to be evaluated in addition to aortic valve area and pressure gradient for assessment of AS.

Hypertension in Aortic Stenosis

The impact of hypertension on left ventricular structure and outcome during progression of aortic valve stenosis has not been reported from a large prospective study. Data from 1616 patients with asymptomatic aortic stenosis randomized to placebo-controlled treatment with combined simvastatin and ezetimibe in the Simvastatin Ezetimibe in Aortic Stenosis Study were used. The primary study end point included combined cardiovascular death, aortic valve events, and ischemic cardiovascular events. Hypertension was defined as history of hypertension or elevated baseline blood pressure. Left ventricular hypertrophy was defined as left ventricular mass/height 2.7 ≥46.7 g/m 2.7 in women and ≥49.2 g/m 2.7 in men and concentric geometry as relative wall thickness ≥0.43. Baseline peak aortic jet velocity and aortic stenosis progression rate did not differ between hypertensive (n=1340) and normotensive (n=276) patients. During 4.3 years of follow-up, the prevalence of concentric left ventricular hypertrophy increased 3 times in both groups. Hypertension predicted 51% higher incidence of abnormal LV geometry at final study visit independent of other confounders ( P <0.01). In time-varying Cox regression, hypertension did not predict increased rate of the primary study end point. However, hypertension was associated with a 56% higher rate of ischemic cardiovascular events and a 2-fold increased mortality (both P <0.01), independent of aortic stenosis severity, abnormal left ventricular geometry, in-treatment systolic blood pressure, and randomized study treatment. No impact on aortic valve replacement was found. In conclusion, among patients with initial asymptomatic mild-to-moderate aortic stenosis, hypertension was associated with more abnormal left ventricular structure and increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality.

Usefulness of exercise-stress echocardiography for risk stratification of true asymptomatic patients with aortic valve stenosis

Aims Abnormal exercise test defined as the occurrence of exercise limiting symptoms, fall in blood pressure below baseline, or complex ventricular arrhythmias is useful to predict clinical events in asymptomatic patients with aortic stenosis (AS). The purpose of this study was to determine whether exercise-stress echocardiography (ESE) adds any incremental prognostic value to resting echocardiography in patients with AS having a normal exercise response. Methods and results One hundred and eighty-six asymptomatic patients with at least moderate AS and preserved LV ejection fraction (>/=50%) were assessed by Doppler-echocardiography at rest and during a maximum ramp semi-supine bicycle exercise test. Fifty-one (27%) patients had an abnormal exercise test and were excluded from the present analysis. Among the 135 patients with normal exercise test, 67 had an event (aortic valve replacement motivated by symptoms or cardiovascular death) at a mean follow-up of 20 +/- 14 months. The variables independently associated with events were: age >/=65 years [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.96; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.15-3.47; P = 0.01], diabetes, (HR = 3.20; 95% CI: 1.33-6.87; P = 0.01), LV hypertrophy (HR = 1.96; 95% CI: 1.17-3.27; P = 0.01), resting mean gradient >35 mmHg (HR = 3.60; 95% CI: 2.11-6.37; P < 0.0001), and exercise-induced increase in mean gradient >20 mmHg (HR = 3.83; 95% CI: 2.16-6.67; P < 0.0001). Conclusion The exercise-induced increase in transvalvular gradient may be helpful to improve risk stratification in asymptomatic AS patients with normal exercise response. These results thus suggest that ESE may provide additional prognostic information over that obtained from standard exercise testing and resting echocardiography.

Comparison of dual-source computed tomography for the quantification of the aortic valve area in patients with aortic stenosis versus transthoracic echocardiography and invasive hemodynamic assessment

We compared the measurements of the aortic valve area (AVA) using dual-source computed tomography (DSCT) in patients with mid to severe aortic stenosis to measurements using transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and invasive hemodynamic assessment. A total of 50 patients (mean age 73 +/- 10 years) with suspected aortic stenosis were included. The computed tomographic data were acquired using DSCT with standardized scan parameters (2 x 64 x 0.6 mm collimation, 330-ms rotation, 120-kV tube voltage, 560 mA/rot tube current). After injection of 35 ml contrast agent (flow rate 5 ml/s), a targeted volume data set, ranging from the top of the leaflets to the infundibulum, was acquired. Ten cross-sectional data sets (slice thickness 1 mm, no overlap, increment 0.6 mm) were reconstructed during systole in 5% increments of the R-R interval. The AVA determined in systole by planimetry was compared to the calculated AVA values using the continuity equation on TTE and the Gorlin formula on catheterization. DSCT allowed the planimetry of the AVA in all patients. The mean AVA using DSCT was 1.16 +/- 0.47 cm(2) compared to a mean AVA of 1.04 +/- 0.45 cm(2) using TTE and 1.06 +/- 0.45 cm(2) using catheterization, with a significant correlation between DSCT/TTE (r = 0.93, p <0.001) and DSCT/cardiac catheterization (r = 0.97, p <0.001). However, DSCT demonstrated a slight, but significant, overestimation of the AVA compared to TTE (+0.12 +/- 0.17 cm) and catheterization (+0.10 +/- 0.12 cm(2)). In conclusion, DSCT permits one to assess the AVA with a high-image quality and diagnostic accuracy compared to TTE and invasive determination.

Planimetry of the aortic valve orifice area: comparison of multislice spiral computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging

OBJECTIVE

We sought to determine the comparability of multislice computed tomography (MSCT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for measuring the aortic valve orifice area (AVA) and grading aortic valve stenosis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty-seven individuals, among them 18 patients with valvular stenosis, underwent AVA planimetry by both MSCT and MRI. In the subset of patients with valvular stenosis, AVA was also calculated from transthoracic Doppler echocardiography (TTE) using the continuity equation.

RESULTS

There was excellent correlation between MSCT and MRI (r = 0.99) and limits of agreement were in an acceptable range (± 0.42 cm(2)) although MSCT yielded a slightly smaller mean AVA than MRI (1.57 ± 0.83 cm(2) vs. 1.67 ± 0.98 cm(2), p < 0.05). However, in the subset of patients with valvular stenosis, the mean AVA was not different between MSCT and MRI (1.05 ± 0.30 cm(2) vs. 1.04 ± 0.39 cm(2); p > 0.05). The mean AVAs on both MSCT and MRI were systematically larger than on TTE (0.88 ± 0.28 cm(2), p < 0.001 each). Using an AVA of 1.0 cm(2) on TTE as reference, the best threshold for detecting severe-to-critical stenosis on MSCT and MRI was an AVA of 1.25 cm(2) and 1.30 cm(2), respectively, resulting in an accuracy of 96% each.

CONCLUSION

Our study specifies recent reports on the suitability of MSCT for quantifying AVA. The data presented here suggest that certain methodical discrepancies of AVA measurements exist between MSCT, MRI and TTE. However, MSCT and MRI have shown excellent correlation in AVA planimetry and similar accuracy in grading aortic valve stenosis.

Low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis: from evaluation to treatment

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Valve replacement improves symptoms and survival in symptomatic severe aortic stenosis. Low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis, however, is an especially challenging subset as valve replacement has a significant risk, and may fail to alleviate symptoms or improve left ventricular function. This article reviews the potential problems in evaluating aortic stenosis severity in low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis, the utility of dobutamine challenge to identify patients most likely to benefit from surgery, and the factors predicting patient outcome.

RECENT FINDINGS

Low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis consists of a heterogeneous group of patients with 'true' severe aortic stenosis, in whom afterload mismatch results from a severely stenotic valve; and 'pseudo-severe' aortic stenosis, where the valve is only mildly or moderately stenotic, but appears severe due to limitations in determining disease severity under low-flow conditions. Valve replacement is likely to benefit the former group, but may have little benefit to the latter. Dobutamine challenge can distinguish 'true' and 'pseudo-severe' aortic stenosis, and can evaluate contractile reserve, one of the strongest predictors of patient outcome. Strategies to avoid prosthesis-patient mismatch should be considered to optimize postoperative outcome.

SUMMARY

Dobutamine challenge can identify low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis patients most likely to benefit from valve replacement and provides important prognostic information on the operative risks and long-term outcome.

Impact of blood pressure on the Doppler echocardiographic assessment of severity of aortic stenosis

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the impact of blood pressure (BP) on the Doppler echocardiographic (Doppler-echo) evaluation of severity of aortic stenosis (AS).

METHODS

Handgrip exercise or phenylephrine infusion was used to increase BP in 22 patients with AS. Indices of AS severity (mean pressure gradient (DeltaP(mean)), aortic valve area (AVA), valve resistance, percentage left ventricular stroke work loss (% LVSW loss) and the energy loss coefficient (ELCo)) were measured at baseline, peak BP intervention and recovery.

RESULTS

From baseline to peak intervention, mean (SD) BP increased (99 (8) vs 121 (10) mm Hg, p<0.001), systemic vascular resistance (SVR) increased (1294 (264) vs 1552 (372) dynexs/cm(5), p<0.001) and mean (SD) transvalvular flow rate (Q(mean)) decreased (323 (67) vs 306 (66) ml/s, p = 0.02). There was no change in DeltaP(mean) (36 (13) vs 36 (14) mm Hg, p = NS). However, there was a decrease in AVA (1.15 (0.32) vs 1.09 (0.33) cm(2), p = 0.02) and ELCo (1.32 (0.40) vs 1.24 (0.42) cm(2), p = 0.04), and an increase in valve resistance (153 (63) vs 164 (74) dynexs/cm(5), p = 0.02), suggesting a more severe valve stenosis. In contrast, % LVSW loss decreased (19.8 (6) vs 16.5 (6)%, p<0.001), suggesting a less severe valve stenosis. There was an inverse relationship between the change in mean BP and AVA (r = -0.34, p = 0.02); however, only the change in Q(mean) was an independent predictor of the change in AVA (r = 0.81, p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Acute BP elevation due to increased SVR can affect the Doppler-echo evaluation of AS severity. However, the impact of BP on the assessment of AS severity depends primarily on the associated change in Q(mean), rather than on an independent effect of SVR or arterial compliance, and can result in a valve appearing either more or less stenotic depending on the direction and magnitude of the change in Q(mean).

Valvular Aortic Stenosis

Standard echocardiographic evaluation of aortic stenosis (AS) severity includes measurement of aortic velocity, mean transaortic pressure gradient, and continuity equation valve area. Although these measures are adequate for decision making in most patients, there is no single value that defines severe stenosis. Aortic stenosis affects not just the valve, but the entire vascular system, including the left ventricle (LV) and systemic vasculature. More sophisticated measures of disease severity might explain the apparent overlap in hemodynamic severity between symptomatic and asymptomatic patients and might better predict the optimal timing of valve replacement. There have been several approaches to evaluation of stenosis severity based on valve hemodynamics, the ventricular response to increased afterload, ventricular-vascular coupling, or the systemic functional consequences of valve obstruction, such as exercise testing and serum brain natriuretic peptide levels. Aortic valve replacement is indicated when symptoms due to severe AS are present. In most asymptomatic patients, the risk of surgery is greater than the risk of watchful waiting so that management includes patient education, periodic echocardiography, and cardiac risk factor modification. Many adults with AS have comorbid conditions that affect both the diagnosis and management of the valve disease, including aortic regurgitation, aortic root dilation, hypertension, coronary artery disease, LV dysfunction, and atrial fibrillation. Comorbid conditions should be evaluated and treated based on established guidelines, although awareness of the potential effects of therapy in the presence of valve obstruction is needed.

Influence of Preoperative Left Ventricular Contractile Reserve on Postoperative Ejection Fraction in Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis

Background— Dobutamine stress hemodynamics (DSH) has the potential to stratify operative risk in low-gradient aortic stenosis (AS), but little is known about the relation between left ventricle contractile reserve and postoperative left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). We sought to assess the value of DSH to predict postoperative improvement in LVEF.

Methods and Results— Sixty-six consecutive patients with symptomatic severe AS (aortic valve area ≤1 cm 2 ), LVEF ≤40%, and mean pressure gradient ≤40 mm Hg prospectively enrolled in the French multicenter study on low-gradient AS and who survived to aortic valvular replacement (AVR) were included. Preoperative contractile reserve was present in 46 patients (group I; 70%) and absent in 20 patients (group II; 30%). In the overall sample, 58% of patients improved by 2 New York Heart Association (NYHA) classes after AVR. Mean LVEF improved from 29±6% to 47±11% ( P <0.0001). LVEF improved by ≥10 EF units in 38 patients (83%) in group I and in 13 patients (65%) in group II. Mean LVEF improvement was similar in the 2 groups (19±10% versus 17±11%; P =0.54). On multivariable analysis, multivessel coronary artery disease ( P =0.05) and baseline mean transaortic pressure gradient ( P =0.01) were related to LVEF improvement, whereas contractile reserve was not.

Conclusions— LVEF increases in the majority of patients with low-gradient AS who survive after AVR. Although the absence of contractile reserve on DSH is related to high operative mortality, it does not predict the absence of LVEF recovery in patients surviving to AVR. These data further support the concept that surgery should not be contraindicated on the basis of absence of contractile reserve alone.

Flow-Dependent Changes in Doppler-Derived Aortic Valve Effective Orifice Area Are Real and Not Due to Artifact

OBJECTIVES

We sought to determine whether the flow-dependent changes in Doppler-derived valve effective orifice area (EOA) are real or due to artifact.

BACKGROUND

It has frequently been reported that the EOA may vary with transvalvular flow in patients with aortic stenosis. However, the explanation of the flow dependence of EOA remains controversial and some studies have suggested that the EOA estimated by Doppler-echocardiography (EOA(Dop)) may underestimate the actual EOA at low flow rates.

METHODS

One bioprosthetic valve and three rigid orifices were tested in a mock flow circulation model over a wide range of flow rates. The EOA(Dop) was compared with reference values obtained using particle image velocimetry (EOA(PIV)).

RESULTS

There was excellent agreement between EOA(Dop) and EOA(PIV) (r2 = 0.94). For rigid orifices of 0.5 and 1.0 cm2, no significant change in the EOA was observed with increasing flow rate. However, substantial increases of both EOA(Dop) and EOA(PIV) were observed when stroke volume increased from 20 to 70 ml both in the 1.5 cm2 rigid orifice (+52% for EOA(Dop) and +54% for EOA(PIV)) and the bioprosthetic valve (+62% for EOA(Dop) and +63% for EOA(PIV)); such changes are explained either by the presence of unsteady effects at low flow rates and/or by an increase in valve leaflet opening.

CONCLUSIONS

The flow-dependent changes in EOA(Dop) are not artifacts but represent real changes in EOA attributable either to unsteady effects at low flow rates and/or to changes in valve leaflet opening. Such changes in EOA(Dop) can be relied on for clinical judgment making.

Aortic stenosis and the failing heart

The combination of aortic stenosis and left-ventricular dysfunction is a challenging situation for the physician. Diagnosis of this condition requires a detailed evaluation to understand the etiology and reversibility of the ventricular dysfunction and to accurately determine the real severity of the stenosis. Whether the aortic stenosis the cause of the left ventricular failure or is an independent disease has significant diagnostic, prognostic and therapeutic implications. Dobutamine echocardiography provides critical information to determine the real severity and the left ventricle's potential to recover (contractile reserve). Attempts to delay the progression of the aortic stenosis with medical treatment have been limited, and valve replacement remains the hallmark of ultimate treatment. If surgery is inadvertently delayed, left ventricular systolic dysfunction will result in clinically evident congestive heart failure and this situation carries a very high short-term mortality. Aortic valve replacement in this setting improves the outcome, but perioperative mortality is high, and particularly when coronary revascularization is also needed, there is no ventricular contractile reserve and transvalvular gradients are low. Adequate timing of surgery is extremely important and increasingly more difficult. Management decisions should be tailored by the results of dobutamine echocardiography and made on a case-by-case basis.

[Dobutamine hemodynamics for aortic stenosis with left ventricular dysfunction]

Patients with aortic stenosis (AS) and left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction have a poor short-term prognosis. In this setting, the decrease in transaortic gradients has an independent prognostic value for operative risk and long-term outcome. The 2 main issues for these patients are: (1) The real severity of AS; (2) How to stratify operative risk and evaluate long-term prognosis. Dobutamine Hemodynamics has the potential to address these issues. In case of relative AS, valve area is increased by dobutamine (final valve area > 1.2 cm2 with a mean pressure gradient <30 mmHg); on the basis of published data, medical treatment is justified in this case. Left ventricular contractile reserve is defined an increase in stroke volume, by 20% or more, under dobutamine. Operative risk is between 5 and 11% in case of LV contractile reserve and long-term outcome is improved by surgery in this case. In contrast, operative risk varies from 30 to 60% in case of exhausted reserve; this risk is also determined by other factors such as the presence of coronary artery disease and associated comorbidities. All these parameters are factored into risk-benefit analysis in order to determine the best therapeutic approach for each patient.

Stress echocardiography in heart failure

Echocardiography has the ability to noninvasively explore hemodynamic variables during pharmacologic or exercise stress test in patients with heart failure. In this review, we detail some important potential applications of stress echocardiography in patients with heart failure. In patients with coronary artery disease and chronic LV dysfunction, dobutamine stress echocardiography is able to distinguish between viable and fibrotic tissue to make adequate clinical decisions. Exercise testing, in combination with echocardiographic monitoring, is a method of obtaining accurate information in the assessment of functional capacity and prognosis. Functional mitral regurgitation is a common finding in patients with dilated and ischaemic cardiomyopathy and stress echocardiography in the form of exercise or pharmacologic protocols can be useful to evaluate the behaviour of mitral regurgitation. It is clinical useful to search the presence of contractile reserve in non ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy such as to screen or monitor the presence of latent myocardial dysfunction in patients who had exposure to cardiotoxic agents. Moreover, in patients with suspected diastolic heart failure and normal systolic function, exercise echocardiography could be able to demonstrate the existence of such dysfunction and determine that it is sufficient to limit exercise tolerance. Finally, in the aortic stenosis dobutamine echocardiography can distinguish severe from non-severe stenosis in patients with low transvalvular gradients and depressed left ventricular function.

Is it ever too late to operate on the patient with valvular heart disease?

All valvular heart disease imparts a hemodynamic burden on the left and/or right ventricle. This burden can only be removed effectively by correcting the responsible valvular lesion. Although a percutaneous approach is usually used to correct mitral stenosis, other valve lesions require surgical intervention. Over the past 40 years there has been a persistent improvement in our understanding of the pathophysiology of valvular heart disease and in the surgical techniques for correcting it. These factors have acted in concert to alter our view of the proper timing and applicability of surgery. On one hand it is no longer necessary or even advisable to delay surgery until advanced symptoms are present, and thus surgery is timed earlier today than it was even a decade ago. On the other hand, many but not all patients with far advanced disease, once considered inoperable, are now often helped substantially by valve surgery. However, selection of which of these very ill patients will or will not benefit from valve surgery remains a challenge for all of us. It is this group of patients that is addressed in the review.

Evaluation of Aortic Valve Disorders Using Stress Echocardiography

Stress echocardiography is a safe and valuable test to aid in the diagnosis and management of patients with aortic valve disorders. In patients with suspected severe aortic stenosis (AS) and low aortic gradients secondary to low cardiac output, dobutamine echocardiography distinguishes those patients with contractile reserve (CR) from those without it. By increasing the stroke volume in subjects with CR, true severe AS patients have an increase in transaortic gradients without a significant change in the valve area, whereas patients with pseudostenosis have an increase in the gradients with concomitant increase in the aortic valve area to >1 cm(2). Patients without CR are indeterminate in their AS status and have a poor prognosis. The presence of CR is also important in patients suffering from aortic insufficiency, as it may predict the development of symptoms, myocardial dysfunction, or death in the asymptomatic phase of the disease, and the potential for left ventricular functional recovery after valve replacement. Finally, both exercise and dobutamine echocardiography can help in the assessment of valve malfunction or mismatch in patients with aortic valve prostheses experiencing exercise intolerance by correlating the symptoms with the change in the aortic gradients induced during stress testing.

Estimation of aortic valve effective orifice area by Doppler echocardiography: effects of valve inflow shape and flow rate

BACKGROUND

The effective orifice area (EOA) is the standard parameter for the clinical assessment of aortic stenosis severity. It has been reported that EOA measured by Doppler echocardiography does not necessarily provide an accurate estimate of the cross-sectional area of the flow jet at the vena contracta, especially at low flow rates. The objective of this study was to test the validity of the Doppler-derived EOA.

METHODS

Triangular and circular orifice plates, funnels, and bioprosthetic valves were inserted into an in vitro aortic flow model and were studied under different physiologic flow rates corresponding to cardiac outputs varying from 1.5 to 7 L/min. For each experiment, the EOA was measured by Doppler and compared with the catheter-derived EOA and with the EOA derived from a theoretic formula. In bioprostheses, the geometric orifice area (GOA) was estimated from images acquired by high-speed video recording.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference between the EOA derived from the 3 methods with the rigid orifices (Doppler vs catheter: y = 0.97x +0.18 mm(2), r(2) = 0.98; Doppler vs theory: y = 1.00x -3.60 mm(2), r(2) = 0.99). Doppler EOA was not significantly influenced by the flow rate in rigid orifices. As predicted by theory, the average contraction coefficient (EOA/GOA) was around 0.6 in the orifice plates and around 1.0 in the funnels. In the bioprosthetic valves, both EOA and GOA increased with increasing flow rate whereas contraction coefficient was almost constant with an average value of 0.99. There was also a very good concordance between EOA and GOA (y = 0.94x +0.05 mm(2), r(2) = 0.88).

CONCLUSIONS

In rigid aortic stenosis, the Doppler EOA is much less flow dependent than generally assumed. Indeed, it depends mainly on the GOA and the inflow shape (flat vs funnel-shaped) of the stenosis. The flow dependence of Doppler EOA observed in clinical studies is likely a result of a variation of the valve GOA or of the valve inflow shape and not an inherent flow dependence of the EOA derived by the continuity equation.

Role of transvalvular gradient in outcome from valve replacement for aortic stenosis

BACKGROUND

Despite limitations the transvalvular gradient (TVG) still is commonly used in aortic stenosis when patients are referred for aortic valve replacement. We wished to ascertain if it had a role in predicting outcome from valve replacement rather than as an indicator of severity, specifically investigating if the TVG affected renal dysfunction, hospital stay, and medium-term survival after valve replacement.

METHODS

Six hundred and twenty-three consecutive patients who had aortic valve replacement were identified and 211 of these patients were isolated as first time replacement for aortic stenosis that formed the final study group, and were followed up for up to 48 months. Variables significant (p < 0.05) on univariate analysis were included in the logistic regression multivariate analysis (renal dysfunction, prolonged hospital stay) or Cox proportional hazard regression model (medium-term mortality).

RESULTS

A significant association was present between TVG and age (p = 0.001). Multivariate analysis demonstrated angina greater than or equal to grade 3 Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS 3; p = 0.014) and having nonelective surgery (p < 0.001) to be independent predictors of renal dysfunction. Angina greater than or equal to CCS 3 (p = 0.013) was the only independent predictor of prolonged hospital stay. Independent predictors of medium-term mortality on multivariate analysis were age (p = 0.043) and having a size 19 valve prosthesis (p = 0.015).

CONCLUSIONS

The TVG is inadequate as an independent predictor of the degree of aortic stenosis and outcome from aortic valve replacement in aortic stenosis. In contrast, the TVG may be a useful screening tool for detecting aortic stenosis in targeted elderly populations.

Temporal variations in effective orifice area during ejection in patients with valvular aortic stenosis

Effective orifice area (EOA) is the standard index for assessing aortic stenosis (AS) severity. However, EOA varies during ejection and a single measurement at 1 ejection time point may not fully describe the hemodynamic severity of a stenotic aortic valve. We investigated whether the dynamic change in EOA during ejection differs between patients with severe AS (EOA </= 1.0 cm(2)) (n = 15) and age-/sex-matched control patients (n = 15), and whether the ejection pattern varies with AS severity (n = 45). In patients with severe AS, maximum left ventricular outflow tract velocity (V(LVOT)) and transvalvular velocity (V(AS)) occurred later in the ejection period (EP) when compared with control patients (V(LVOT) 47 +/- 8 vs 29 +/- 8%, P =.0001; V(AS) 36 +/- 7 vs 27 +/- 8%, P =.003). Maximum V(LVOT) occurred later than maximum V(AS) in patients with severe AS (47 +/- 8 vs 36 +/- 7%, P =.0005), but simultaneously in control patients (29 +/- 8 vs 27 +/- 8%, P = NS). Patients with severe AS had a slower EOA opening rate than control patients (4 +/- 1 vs 41 +/- 38 cm(2)/s, P =.002) and reached 80% and 100% of maximum EOA later in the EP (43 +/- 26 vs 15 +/- 6%, P =.001; 70 +/- 20 vs 48 +/- 30%, P =.03). EOA tended to increase between 10% and 90% of the EP in patients with severe AS, but had a plateau in control patients (slope 0.38 +/- 0.26 vs 0.02 +/- 0.25% change in EOA per 1% change of EP, P =.0006). In patients with severe AS, EOA was >/=80% of maximum EOA for a shorter duration during ejection compared with control patients (49 +/- 25 vs 64 +/- 14%, P =.05). EOA opening rate, time to maximum V(LVOT), time to maximum V(AS), and time to 80% of maximum EOA correlated with mean pressure gradient (r = -0.80, 0.63, 0.42, and 0.54, respectively, n = 45). Indices of ejection dynamics and valve kinetics differ in patients with AS and may provide further insight into the hemodynamic or physiologic severity of a stenotic aortic valve.

Management of the elderly aortic stenosis patient with low gradient and low ejection fraction

The incidence of aortic stenosis increases with age and thus it occurs frequently in elderly patients. Once severe obstruction has developed, death occurs within 3 years unless the aortic valve is replaced. The results of aortic valve surgery, even in octogenarians, are usually excellent in the absence of comorbidity. The exception to this rule is for the aortic stenosis patient who has low ejection fraction, a low cardiac output and a transvalvular gradient of <30 mm Hg. Such patients have far advanced left ventricular dysfunction and increased operative mortality. However, even these patients may benefit from surgery if they have truly severe aortic stenosis. Because valve area is unreliable at low cardiac outputs, output should be increased pharmacologically in such patients and the valve area recalculated. If the transvalvular gradient increases with output, severe aortic stenosis is present and valve replacement may be beneficial. However, if output increases but gradient does not, only mild stenosis is present and surgery is unlikely to prolong life.

Evaluación de la severidad y decisiones quirúrgicas en las valvulopatías

A better knowledge of the natural history of valvular disease and the advances in surgical techniques are allowing to improve the prognosis of patients with valvular heart disease. At present, imaging techniques, particularly Doppler-echocardiography, is the main tool to determine the diagnosis and prognosis of patients with valvular heart disease. Consequently, decision making in valvular heart disease is now days based on a combination of symptomatic status and echocardiographic findings. The main applications of Doppler-echocardiography with this purpose are summarized in this article. Therapeutic algorithms for patients with valvular heart disease are proposed, as well as the potential application of new imaging modalities appeared in the last years. The state of the art of clinical practice guidelines are also reviewed.

Clinical efficacy of Doppler-echocardiographic indices of aortic valve stenosis: a comparative test-based analysis of outcome

OBJECTIVES

This study was designed to assess which hemodynamic index best accounts for clinical severity of aortic stenosis (AS) and to analyze the value of low-dose dobutamine testing.

BACKGROUND

Pressure gradient and valve area are suboptimal because they depend on flow rate, correlate poorly with symptoms, and provide limited prognostic information. Recently, new indices and low-dose inotropic stimulation have been introduced, but their clinical value remains uncertain.

METHODS

A total of 307 consecutive patients with AS were included in an ambispective study design (71 +/- 12 years old; peak jet velocity: 3.7 +/- 1.1 m/s). Clinical and Doppler-echocardiographic data were obtained, as well as results of low-dose dobutamine infusion (47 patients). Using receiver-operator-characteristic curve analysis, we evaluated jet velocity, pressure gradient, valve area, resistance, stroke-work loss (SWL), and dobutamine-induced increase in area for predicting 1) symptomatic status at entry, 2) early (</=3 months) cardiovascular death or aortic valve replacement, and 3) long-term outcome. Logistic regression and Cox models were designed multivariate and adjusted by bootstrapping.

RESULTS

Only 28% of patients were alive without valve replacement at the end of the follow-up period (22 +/- 4 months). The decision for valve replacement was made by the referring physician, blinded to the SWL, valve resistance, and dobutamine results. Non-flow-corrected indices performed better than valve area and valve resistance. Among them, SWL best predicted the defined end points. Odds/hazard ratios associated with a SWL Delta = 17% were 5.14 for presenting AS symptoms, 4.68 for early events, and 2.31 for late outcome. A cutoff value of SWL >25% best discriminated clinical end points. Other independent predictors of prognosis were symptomatic status and left ventricular ejection fraction. Dobutamine testing added no value to baseline models.

CONCLUSIONS

Non-flow-corrected indices show the highest clinical efficacy in aortic stenosis. Among these, SWL best predicts symptomatic status and outcome and therefore should be incorporated to aid patient management in unclear situations.