Aortic regurgitation complicated by extreme left ventricular dilation: long-term outcome after surgical correction

Left ventricular reverse remodeling after aortic valve replacement or repair in bicuspid aortic valve with moderate or greater aortic regurgitation

Objective

Bicuspid aortic valve (AV) patients with aortic regurgitation (AR) differ from tricuspid AV patients given younger age, greater left ventricle (LV) compliance, and more prevalent aortic stenosis (AS). Bicuspid AV-specific data to guide timing of AV replacement or repair are lacking.

Methods

Adults with bicuspid AV and moderate or greater AR who underwent aortic valve replacement or repair at our center were studied. The presurgical echocardiogram, and echocardiograms within 3 years postoperatively were evaluated for LV geometry/function, and AV function. Semiquantitative AS/AR assessment was performed in all patients with adequate imaging.

Results

One hundred thirty-five patients (85% men, aged 44.5 ± 15.9 years) were studied (63% pure AR, 37% mixed AS/AR). Following aortic valve replacement or repair, change in LV end-diastolic dimension and change in LV end-diastolic volume were associated with preoperative LV end-diastolic dimension (β = 0.62 Δcm/cm; 95% CI, 0.43-0.73 Δcm/cm; P < .001), and LV end-diastolic volume (β = 0.6 ΔmL/mL; 95% CI, 0.4-0.7 ΔmL/mL; P < .001), respectively, each independent of AR/AS severity (P = not significant). Baseline LV size predicted postoperative normalization (LV end-diastolic dimension: odds ratio, 3.75/cm; 95% CI, 1.61-8.75/cm, LV end-diastolic volume: odds ratio, 1.01/mL; 95% CI, 1.004-1.019/mL, both P values < .01) whereas AR/AS severity did not (P = not significant). Indexed LV end diastolic volume outperformed LV end-diastolic dimension in predicting postoperative LV normalization (area under the curve = 0.74 vs 0.61) with optimal diagnostic cutoffs of 99 mL/m2 and 6.1 cm, respectively. Postoperative indexed LV end diastolic volume dilatation was associated with increased risk of death, transplant/ventricular assist device, ventricular arrhythmia, and reoperation (hazard ratio, 6.1; 95% CI, 1.7-21.5; P < .01).

Conclusions

Remodeling extent following surgery in patients with bicuspid AV and AR relates to preoperative LV size independent of valve disease phenotype or severity. Many patients with LV end-diastolic dimension below current surgical thresholds did not normalize LV size. LV volumetric assessment offered superior diagnostic performance for predicting residual LV dilatation, and postoperative indexed LV end diastolic volume dilatation was associated with adverse prognosis.

Impact of early versus class I-triggered surgery on postoperative survival in severe aortic regurgitation: An observational study from the Aortic Valve Insufficiency and Ascending Aorta Aneurysm International Registry

OBJECTIVES

Class I triggers for severe and chronic aortic regurgitation surgery mainly rely on symptoms or systolic dysfunction, resulting in a negative outcome despite surgical correction. Therefore, US and European guidelines now advocate for earlier surgery. We sought to determine whether earlier surgery leads to improved postoperative survival.

METHODS

We evaluated the postoperative survival of patients who underwent surgery for severe aortic regurgitation in the international multicenter registry for aortic valve surgery, Aortic Valve Insufficiency and Ascending Aorta Aneurysm International Registry, over a median follow-up of 37 months.

RESULTS

Among 1899 patients (aged 49 ± 15 years, 85% were male), 83% and 84% had class I indication according to the American Heart Association and European Society of Cardiology, respectively, and most were offered repair surgery (92%). Twelve patients (0.6%) died after surgery, and 68 patients died within 10 years after the procedure. Heart failure symptoms (hazard ratio, 2.60 [1.20-5.66], P = .016) and either left ventricular end-systolic diameter greater than 50 mm or left ventricular end-systolic diameter index greater than 25 mm/m2 (hazard ratio, 1.64 [1.05-2.55], P = .030) predicted survival independently over and above age, gender, and bicuspid phenotype. Therefore, patients who underwent surgery based on any class I trigger had worse adjusted survival. However, patients who underwent surgery while meeting early imaging triggers (left ventricular end-systolic diameter index 20-25 mm/m2 or left ventricular ejection fraction 50% to 55%) had no significant outcome penalty.

CONCLUSIONS

In this international registry of severe aortic regurgitation, surgery when meeting class I triggers led to postoperative outcome penalty compared with earlier triggers (left ventricular end-systolic diameter index 20-25 mm/m2 or ventricular ejection fraction 50%-55%). This observation, which applies to expert centers where aortic valve repair is feasible, should encourage the global use of repair techniques and the conduction of randomized trials.

Comparison of the Recent Updates to the ACC/AHA and ESC Guidelines for the Management of Valvular Heart Disease: Similarities and Differences

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

There have been several advances in the diagnosis and management of valvular heart disease (VHD) over the last decade. These have been reflected in the latest European and North American guidelines, although both contain significant similarities and differences. In this review, we highlight the important overlaps and variations between the updated guidelines and their previous versions to help guide the general cardiologist.

RECENT FINDINGS

There has been extensive revision on the use of percutaneous treatments, the indications for intervention in asymptomatic VHD, and perioperative bridging therapies. The updated guidelines provide new recommendations in many aspects of VHD; however, there remain significant gaps in the role of biomarkers in VHD and the long-term outcomes of novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) and transcatheter therapies.

Left ventricle reverse remodeling in chronic aortic regurgitation patients with dilated ventricle after aortic valve replacement

BACKGROUND

Aortic valve replacement (AVR) for chronic aortic regurgitation (AR) with a severe dilated left ventricle and dysfunction leads to left ventricle remodeling. But there are rarely reports on the left ventricle reverse remodeling (LVRR) after AVR. This study aimed to investigate the LVRR and outcomes in chronic AR patients with severe dilated left ventricle and dysfunction after AVR.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the clinical datum of chronic aortic regurgitation patients who underwent isolated AVR. The LVRR was defined as an increase in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) at least 10 points or a follow-up LVEF ≥ 50%, and a decrease in the indexed left ventricular end-diastolic diameter of at least 10%, or an indexed left ventricular end-diastolic diameter ≤ 33 mm/m². The changes in echocardiographic parameters after AVR, survival analysis, the predictors of major adverse cardiac events (MACE), the association between LVRR and MACE were analyzed.

RESULTS

Sixty-nine patients with severe dilated left ventricle and dysfunction underwent isolated AVR. LV remodeling in 54 patients and no LV remodeling in 15 patients at 6-12 months follow-up. The preoperative left ventricular dimensions and volumes were larger, and the EF was lower in the LV no remodeling group than those in the LV remodeling group (all p < 0.05). The adverse LVRR was the predictor for MACE at follow-up. The mean follow-up period was 47.29 months (range 6 to 173 months). The rate of freedom from MACE was 94.44% at 5 years and 92.59% at 10 years in the remodeling group, 60% at 5 years, and 46.67% at 10 years in the no remodeling group.

CONCLUSIONS

The left ventricle remodeling after AVR was the important predictor for MACE. LV no remodeling may not be associated with benefits from AVR for chronic aortic regurgitation patients with severe dilated LV and dysfunction.

Optimal Management of Chronic Severe Aortic Regurgitation - How to Determine Cutoff Values for Surgical Intervention?

Aortic regurgitation (AR) is a common valvular heart disease, but the optimal timing of surgical intervention remains controversial. In the natural history of chronic severe AR, sudden death is rare, and the annual mortality rate is comparatively low. Considering the hemodynamic features of combined volume and pressure overload and long-term compensation in patients with chronic AR, symptoms related to AR do not frequently occur. Therefore, the progression of left ventricular (LV) dysfunction is a key factor in determining the timing of surgical intervention in patients with severe chronic AR. In addition to symptoms, an ejection fraction <50% and an LV endsystolic diameter (LVESD) >45 mm are appropriate cutoff values for surgical intervention in Japanese patients, whereas LV end-diastolic diameter is not a good indicator. An LVESD index of 25 mm/m²is controversial, because adjusting for body size may cause overcorrection in Japanese patients who have a small body size compared with Westerners. Accumulation of data from the Japanese population is indispensable for establishing guidelines on optimal management of patients with chronic AR.

2020 ACC/AHA Guideline for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease: Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines

AIM

This executive summary of the valvular heart disease guideline provides recommendations for clinicians to diagnose and manage valvular heart disease as well as supporting documentation to encourage their use.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted from January 1, 2010, to March 1, 2020, encompassing studies, reviews, and other evidence conducted on human subjects that were published in English from PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Reports, and other selected database relevant to this guideline. Structure: Many recommendations from the earlier valvular heart disease guidelines have been updated with new evidence and provides newer options for diagnosis and treatment of valvular heart disease. This summary includes only the recommendations from the full guideline which focus on diagnostic work-up, the timing and choice of surgical and catheter interventions, and recommendations for medical therapy. The reader is referred to the full guideline for graphical flow charts, text, and tables with additional details about the rationale for and implementation of each recommendation, and the evidence tables detailing the data considered in developing these guidelines.

Presence of fragmented QRS is associated with left ventricular systolic dysfunction after surgery in patients with severe aortic regurgitation

BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE STUDY

Chronic severe aortic regurgitation (AR) is associated with progressive accumulation of interstitial fibrosis and disruption of myocardial structure. After aortic valve replacement (AVR), the negative remodeling process reverses, and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) improves but not in all patients. In this study, we aimed to investigate the association of fragmented QRS (F-QRS), which is a possible marker of myocardial fibrosis, with postoperative left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction.

METHODS

A total of 147 consecutive patients with AVR were included in this study. F-QRS was identified by the presence of various RSR' patterns (QRS duration <120 ms) such as additional R wave (R prime)or notching of the R or S wave in at least two consecutive leads. Patients were compared in two groups based on the presence or absence of F-QRS. A logistic regression model was used to determine independent predictors of postoperative LV systolic dysfunction (LVEF <50%).

RESULTS

Patients with F-QRS were associated with poor recovery of LV systolic function after AVR compared to the patients without F-QRS, regardless of preoperative LVEF (p = .008). F-QRS was found to be an independent predictor of postoperative LV systolic dysfunction (LVEF <50%). Lower preoperative LVEF and increased LV end diastolic diameter index were also found as independent risk factors for postoperative LV systolic dysfunction.

CONCLUSIONS

As a possible marker of myocardial fibrosis, F-QRS was associated with postoperative LV systolic dysfunction. Therefore, as a simple and convenient clinical parameter, F-QRS may be used to predict poor recovery of LVEF after AVR.

Excess Mortality and Undertreatment of Women With Severe Aortic Stenosis

Background

Although women represent half of the population burden of aortic stenosis (AS), little is known whether sex affects the presentation, management, and outcome of patients with AS.

Methods and Results

In a cohort of 2429 patients with severe AS (49.5% women) we aimed to evaluate 5‐year excess mortality and performance of aortic valve replacement (AVR) stratified by sex. At presentation, women were older (P<0.001), with less comorbidities (P=0.030) and more often symptomatic (P=0.007) than men. Women had smaller aortic valve area (P<0.001) than men but similar mean transaortic pressure gradient (P=0.18). The 5‐year survival was lower compared with expected survival, especially for women (62±2% versus 71% for women and 69±1% versus 71% for men). Despite longer life expectancy in women than men, women had lower 5‐year survival than men (66±2% [expected‐75%] versus 68±2% [expected‐70%], P<0.001) after matching for age. Overall, 5‐year AVR incidence was 79±2% for men versus 70±2% for women (P<0.001) with male sex being independently associated with more frequent early AVR performance (odds ratio, 1.49; 1.18–1.97). After age matching, women remained more often symptomatic (P=0.004) but also displayed lower AVR use (64.4% versus 69.1%; P=0.018).

Conclusions

Women with severe AS are diagnosed at later ages and have more symptoms than men. Despite prevalent symptoms, AVR is less often performed in women and 5‐year excess mortality is noted in women versus men, even after age matching. These imbalances should be addressed to ensure that both sexes receive equivalent care for severe AS.

Aortic Valve Repair: From Concept to Future Targets

Aortic valve repair has become an important treatment alternative to patients with aortic insufficiency. In this paper, we review refinements and advances in the understanding of core concepts of aortic valve anatomy and pathophysiology which have enhanced our approach to aortic valve preservation and repair. With these improvements in understanding and techniques, the outcome for aortic valve repair continues to improve. We also review current challenges in the field and explore potential areas of innovation and future study including timing of surgical intervention for aortic insufficiency, comparisons between aortic valve repair and replacement in randomized trials, and development of personalized surgical management plan based on patient-specific pathologies. These advances will further establish the role of aortic valve repair in the management of aortic valve and aortic disease.

New classification of geometric patterns considering left ventricular volume in patients with chronic aortic valve regurgitation: Prevalence and association with adverse cardiovascular outcomes

BACKGROUND

Left ventricular (LV) remodeling due to aortic regurgitation (AR) often leads to maladaptive responses. We assessed the prevalence and clinical implications of LV remodeling considering LV volume, mass, and relative wall thickness at the time of AR diagnosis.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Between 2008 and 2017, 370 consecutive patients (mean age 67.3 ± 16.1 years, 56.5% males), with moderate or severe AR, were retrospectively analyzed. LV geometric patterns and clinical outcomes (cardiovascular death, hospitalization for heart failure, or aortic valve replacement) were evaluated. LV dilatation (LV end-diastolic volume >75 mL/m² ) was present in 228 patients (61.6%). Applying the new LV remodeling classification system, 40 (10.8%) patients had normal geometry, 14 (3.8%) concentric remodeling, 43 (11.6%) concentric hypertrophy (LVH), 45 (12.2%) indeterminate LVH, 38 (10.3%) mixed LVH, 93 (25.1%) dilated LVH, 54 (14.6%) eccentric LVH, and 43 (11.6%) eccentric remodeling. During a median follow-up of 3.48 years (25th-75th percentile 0.91-5.57), 97 (26.2%) had the combined endpoint. LV dilation (P < 0.001), LVH (P < 0.001), and LV remodeling patterns were significantly associated with the combined endpoint. After multivariable adjustment for age, EF, aortic stenosis, CAD history, and moderate mitral regurgitation, dilated LVH (HR 7.61, IC 95% 1.82-31.80; P = 0.005) and eccentric LVH (HR 7.91, IC 95% 1.82-34.38; P = 0.006) were associated with adverse outcome compared to eccentric remodeling, that showed the best event-free survival rate.

CONCLUSIONS

In a contemporary cohort of patients with AR, applying the new LV remodeling classification system, only a minority had normal geometry. Dilated LVH and eccentric LVH showed distinct outcome penalty after adjustment for confounders.

Survival after Aortic Valve Replacement for Aortic Regurgitation: Prediction from Preoperative Contractility Measurement

BACKGROUND

Noninvasive measurement of myocardial contractility (end-systolic wall stress-adjusted change in left ventricular ejection fraction from rest to exercise [ΔLVEF - ΔESS]) predicts heart failure, subnormal LVEFrest, and sudden death in asymptomatic patients with chronic severe aortic regurgitation (AR). Here we assess the relation of preoperative ΔLVEF - ΔESS to survival after aortic valve replacement (AVR).

METHODS

Patients who underwent AVR for chronic, isolated, pure severe AR (n = 66) were followed for 13.0 ± 6.4 event-free years. Preoperative ΔLVEF - ΔESS (from combined echocardiographic and radionuclide cineangiographic data) enabled cohort stratification into 3 terciles (-1 to -11% [normal or mild] contractility deficit, -12 to -16% [moderate], and ≤-17% [severe], identical with segregation in our earlier study) to relate preoperative contractility to postoperative survival and to age- and gender-matched US census data.

RESULTS

Since AVR, 22 patients died (average annual risk [AAR] for all-cause mortality for the entire co hort = 3.15%). Preoperative ΔLVEF - ΔESS predicted postoperative survival (p = 0.009, log rank test). By contractility terciles, all-cause AARs were 1.44, 2.58, and 6.40%. Survival was lower than among US census comparators (p < 0.02), but the "mild" tercile was indistinguishable from census data (p = ns). By multivariable Cox regression, survival prediction by pre-AVR ΔLVEF - ΔESS was independent of, and superior to, prediction by age at surgery, gender, preoperative functional class, LVEFrest, LVEFexercise, change in LVEFrest to exercise, and LV diastolic or systolic dimensions (p ≤ 0.01, pre-AVR ΔLVEF - ΔESS vs. other covariates).

CONCLUSION

In severe AR, preoperative contractility predicts post-AVR survival and may be prognostically superior to clinical, geometric and performance descriptors, potentially impacting on patient selection for surgery.

Frequency of early remodeling of left ventricle and its comparison between patients with stroke volume ≥97 Ml versus patients with stroke volume <97 Ml after aortic valve replacement for severe aortic regurgitation

Objectives:

To evaluate the frequency of early remodeling in patients of severe aortic regurgitation after aortic valve replacement and to see the incidence of early remodeling in patients with stroke volume >97 ml versus < 97 ml before aortic valve replacement.

Method:

This was a prospective comparative study conducted from August 2013 to December 2014 in a tertiary care hospital. Fifty seven (57) patients of isolated chronic aortic regurgitation were included in this study. SPSS v23 was used for data analysis. Independent sample t-test was used for analysis of continuous variables and chi-square test for qualitative variables.

Results:

Out of fifty seven patients, early remodeling occurred in 34 (59.64%) patients after surgery. The mean pre-operative stroke volume of patient in whom remodeling occurred was 110.3+9.66 ml while mean pre-operative stroke volume of patients who did not undergo remodeling was 86.65+7.63 ml. There were 28 (82.4%) patients with stroke volume >97 ml in whom Remodeling occurred where as in patients with stroke volume <97 ml remodeling occurred only in 6 (17.6%) patients (p value 0.004). There was no in-hospital mortality.

Conclusion:

There is an association between stroke volume and early LV remodeling after Aortic valve replacement. Stroke volume >97 ml is a good predictor of early LV remodeling.

Aortic valve replacement for severe aortic regurgitation in asymptomatic patients with normal ejection fraction and severe left ventricular dilatation

OBJECTIVES

According to current guidelines, aortic valve surgery is a Class II indication for asymptomatic patients with severe aortic regurgitation (AR) accompanied by left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (LVEF) ≥ 50% and left ventricular end-diastolic dimension (LVEDD) >70 mm. This study aims to assess the postoperative outcomes of asymptomatic patients with severe AR accompanied by LVEF ≥ 50% and LVEDD >70 mm after aortic valve replacement (AVR) and to identify prognostic indicators of the surgery, especially in terms of LV ejection fraction and degree of LV dilatation.

METHODS

We retrospectively identified 192 consecutive asymptomatic patients with severe AR accompanied by LVEF ≥ 50% and LVEDD > 70 mm who underwent isolated AVR from January 2003 to December 2013. Postoperative outcomes and prognostic indicators were evaluated and analysed.

RESULTS

Patients had a mean age of 52.4 ± 16.1 years, and 69.3% were male. The mean LVEF and the mean LVEDD were 58.6 ± 6.6% and 76.0 ± 6.9 mm, respectively. The in-hospital mortality rate was 2.1% and survival rates at 5 and 10 years were 94.5 and 86.6%, respectively. Multivariable analysis indicated that postoperative mortality was associated with age [hazard ratio (HR) 1.059, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.010-1.125, P = 0.049], preoperative LVEF (HR 0.860 95% CI: 0.748-0.989, P = 0.035) and LVEDD (HR 1.094 95% CI: 1.008-1.188, P = 0.032). Receiver-operating characteristic analysis showed that preoperative LVEF < 55% and LVEDD ≥ 81 mm were the best cut-off values for predicting postoperative mortality. By subgroup analysis, patients with 50 ≤ LVEF < 55% had poorer 5- and 10-year survival rates of 87.4 and 74.8% compared with 97.3% and 91.7% for patients with LVEF ≥ 55% (P = 0.023). Patients with LVEDD ≥ 81 mm had poorer 5- and 10-year survival rates of 85.6 and 72.6% compared with 98.2% and 85.6% for those with LVEDD < 81 mm (P = 0.027).

CONCLUSIONS

AVR can be performed with satisfactory outcomes for severe aortic regurgitation in asymptomatic patients with severe AR accompanied by LVEF ≥ 50% and LVEDD > 70 mm. It is observed that 50% ≤ LVEF < 55% or LVEDD ≥ 81 mm are associated with poorer prognosis in patients undergoing AVR.

Drug Therapy for Heart Valve Diseases

Valvular heart diseases (VHDs) are progressive. When not caused by acute comorbidities they are generally characterized by long asymptomatic phases during which hemodynamic severity may progress leading to morbidity and mortality. Treatment depends on VHD type and severity but when severe and symptomatic, usually involves mechanical intervention. Asymptomatic patients, and those who lack objective descriptors associated with high risk, are closely observed clinically with optimization of associated cardiovascular risk factors until surgical indications develop. Though often prescribed based on theory, no rigorous evidence supports pharmacological therapy in most chronic situations though drugs may be appropriate in acute valvular diseases, or as a bridge to surgery in severely decompensated patients. Herein, we examine evidence supporting drug use for chronic VHDs.

Long term results and predictors of left ventricular function recovery after aortic valve replacement for chronic aortic regurgitation

OBJECTIVES

In most patients with aortic regurgitation (AR), aortic valve replacement (AVR) improves left ventricular (LV) function, but some patients will not have favorable remodeling. Our objectives were to review long term clinical results of AVR for AR and to examine what factors affect the normalization of LV function after AVR for chronic AR.

METHODS

Between 1989 and 2010, 177 patients underwent isolated AVR for chronic pure AR. The patients were divided into 2 groups based on indexed end-systolic LV diameter (iESD): Group L (iESD) ≥25 mm/m(2)) (130 patients) and Group S (iESD <25 mm/m(2)) (47 patients).

RESULTS

There was no significant difference between groups in late mortality, freedom from cardiac-related death and rehospitalization for heart failure at late follow up after operation. At postoperative follow-up, 16% of patients had not recovered normal LV systolic function. By means of multivariate analysis, iESD and cardiac index (CI) were independent predictors of recovery of LV function and iESD >26.7 mm/m(2) and CI <2.71 l/min/m(2) were the best cut-off values.

CONCLUSIONS

Early and late surgical results of AVR for chronic AR were good, but for the preservation of postoperative normal LV function, AVR for AR patients should be performed before iESD reaches 26.7 mm/m(2).

Size matters! Impact of age, sex, height, and weight on the normal heart size

BACKGROUND

Therapeutic decisions in cardiology are determined frequently by cardiac chamber size. To decide whether cardiac dimensions are still in the normal range, reliable reference values are needed. However, published reference values mostly refer to historical cohorts using motion-mode measurements and have not been adjusted for sex or age. The impact of body size was only vaguely addressed. The importance of such adjustments is illustrated by studies, which show that smaller individuals and women are at risk of delayed treatment and impaired outcome when currently used reference values are applied. The aim of the present study was to assess the impact of body size, sex, and age on the normal heart size.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We prospectively studied 622 individuals (52.7% women; 17-91 years; 143-200 cm; 32-240 kg) without cardiac disease by standard transthoracic echocardiography. Multivariable linear regression analyses of the impact of sex, age, height, and weight on cardiac chamber size were performed. By multivariable regression analysis (n=500), all 4 variables independently influenced cardiac chamber size. The validity of cardiac dimensions predicted by the regression model was tested prospectively in a validation cohort (n=122). A calculator is proposed that estimates cardiac dimensions on the basis of the regression analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Sex, height, weight, and age significantly affect the normal heart size. These parameters need to be considered when cutoff values indicating the need for treatment or even surgery are established.

[Surgery of aortic regurgitation with reduced left ventricular function]

BACKGROUND

Aortic valve replacement improves clinical symptoms and left ventricular systolic function in patients with chronic aortic regurgitation despite a higher surgical risk. The objective of this study is to determine if left ventricular function will be normalized after surgery.

PATIENTS AND METHOD

This retrospective study included 40 patients (nine females and 31 males) with chronic aortic regurgitation and left ventricular systolic dysfunction who were evaluated by echocardiography Doppler. Were included patients with left ventricular ejection fraction less or equal to 45%. Ages ranged from 18 to 77 years (mean = 46.4 ± 12.6 years). Preoperatively, six patients (15%) were asymptomatic, ten (25%) were in NYHA II, half (50%) in NYHA III and four (10%) in NYHA IV. The mean preoperative ejection fraction (EF) was 36.2 ± 2%. The mean end systolic and diastolic dimensions were 61.7 ± 8.5 mm and 78.9 ± 9.7 mm respectively. Aortic regurgitation was quantified grade III in sixteen patients (40%) and grade IV in twenty-four (60%).

RESULTS

Thirty-seven patients underwent aortic valve replacement and three Bentall operations. Hospital mortality was 7.5% (3/40). The mean follow-up period was 69.7 months. All survivor patients were investigated. Out of these, five were lost and 32 were controlled. Symptomatic improvement was noted in most of the survivors. Sixty percent (24/40) were severely symptomatic before and only 6.25% (2/32) during follow-up. The ejection fraction increased significantly after surgery (36.2 ± 2% in preoperative period vs. 55.2 ± 10% in postoperative period, P < 0.02). Left ventricular diameters decreased significantly also. Survival rates were 3-year 94%, 5-year 91% and 7-year 89%.

CONCLUSION

Despite reduced left ventricular systolic function, aortic valve replacement in chronic aortic regurgitation was associated with acceptable operative risk. Surgery improves functional status, symptoms and ejection fraction in most patients.

Aortic valve and ascending aorta guidelines for management and quality measures: executive summary

The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Clinical Practice Guidelines are intended to assist physicians and other health care providers in clinical decision making by describing a range of generally acceptable approaches for the diagnosis, management, or prevention of specific diseases or conditions. These guidelines should not be considered inclusive of all proper methods of care or exclusive of other methods of care reasonably directed at obtaining the same results. Moreover, these guidelines are subject to change over time, without notice. The ultimate judgment regarding the care of a particular patient must be made by the physician in light of the individual circumstances presented by the patient.

Echocardiographic predictors of left ventricular dysfunction after aortic valve surgery in children with chronic aortic regurgitation

OBJECTIVE

Postoperative left ventricular dysfunction is associated with poor prognosis in adults with severe chronic aortic regurgitation and published practice guidelines aim to minimize this risk. However, only limited information exists in pediatrics. The goal of this study was to define preoperative risk factors for postoperative left ventricular dysfunction in children with chronic aortic regurgitation.

METHODS

Patients fulfilling the following criteria were included in this study: (1) age at preoperative echocardiogram ≤18 years; (2) ≥moderate aortic regurgitation; (3) ≤mild aortic valve stenosis; (4) no additional valve disease/shunt; (5) underwent aortic valve surgery for aortic regurgitation; and (6) available preoperative and ≥6-month postoperative echocardiograms with adequate information. Primary outcome was postoperative left ventricular dysfunction defined as ejection fraction z-score < -2.

RESULTS

Median ages at diagnosis and surgery of the 53 eligible patients were 6.9 (0.04-17.2) and 13 years (1.2-22.4), respectively. Compared with patients whose postoperative left ventricular ejection fraction was normal, those with left ventricular ejection fraction z-score < -2 (n = 10) had significantly higher preoperative left ventricular end-diastolic and systolic volumes and dimensions and lower indices of systolic function. Preoperative left ventricular ejection fraction z-score < -1 was the most sensitive (89%; confidence interval [CI] 52, 100) but least specific (58%; CI 41, 73), whereas left ventricular end-systolic diameter z-score ≥ 5 was the most specific (95%; CI 84, 99) but least sensitive (60%; CI 26, 88) outcome identifier. A combination of shortening fraction z-score < -1 or end-systolic diameter z-score ≥ 5 best identified postoperative left ventricular dysfunction with an area of 0.819 under the receiver-operator characteristic curve.

CONCLUSION

Lower indices of left ventricular systolic function and severity of dilation identify children at risk for postoperative left ventricular dysfunction after aortic valve surgery. These identifiers are similar to predictors defined in adult patients albeit with different threshold values.

Contemporary reviews by surgeon: timing of operation for chronic aortic regurgitation

The timing of operation for severe chronic and asymptomatic aortic regurgitation remains problematic, though the present trend is to prefer early surgery. In this article, we review recent reports, mainly published after 2006, regarding indications for surgical treatment for pure chronic AR.

Effect of preoperative ejection fraction, left ventricular systolic dimension and hemoglobin level on survival after aortic valve surgery in patients with severe chronic aortic regurgitation

Surgical indications in patients with severe chronic aortic regurgitation (AR) and normal left ventricular (LV) ejection fractions (EF) remain to be established. The aim of this study was to identify prognostic indicators after surgery in patients with severe AR and normal LV systolic function. Preoperative clinical and echocardiographic characteristics were evaluated in 284 consecutive patients with chronic severe AR who underwent aortic valve surgery. Of these patients, 169 had normal (≥50%) and 115 had depressed (<50%) preoperative LV EFs. All-cause mortality was observed for a median of 39.9 months. Of 284 patients, 7 (4.4%) with normal LV EFs and 15 (12.0%) with depressed LV EFs died during follow-up after aortic valve surgery (p = 0.017). In patients with normal EFs, multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that large LV end-systolic dimension and low plasma hemoglobin level were independent predictors of postsurgical mortality. Receiver-operating characteristic analysis showed that LV end-systolic dimension ≥45 mm and hemoglobin level <13.4 g/dl were the best cut-off values for postoperative mortality. In conclusion, preoperative LV end-systolic dimension and hemoglobin level are independent prognostic factors of survival after aortic valve surgery in patients with chronic severe AR and normal LV EFs.

Usefulness of preoperative stroke volume as strong predictor of left ventricular remodeling and outcomes after aortic valve replacement in patients with severe pure aortic regurgitation

In most patients with aortic regurgitation (AR), aortic valve replacement (AVR) results in favorable left ventricular (LV) remodeling and normalization of the LV ejection fraction (EF). However, some patients with severe AR will not have favorable remodeling and their LVEF will not normalize. The goal of the present study was to determine whether remodeling and clinical outcomes after AVR could be predicted from simple preoperative echocardiographic analysis. A total of 56 consecutive patients with chronic severe pure AR who underwent AVR had preoperative (5 ± 2 days), early postoperative (5 ± 2 days), and late postoperative (328 ± 88 days) echocardiographic data retrospectively analyzed. The LV diameter, The LVEF and stroke volume (SV) were measured. The reduction in LV end-diastolic dimension decreased by 14% (from 65 ± 6 mm to 56 ± 8 mm, p <0.001) early after AVR, with an additional reduction of only 6% late after AVR. More than 2/3 of the overall reduction in end-diastolic dimension was observed the week after AVR. Forty-six patients (82%) had positive early LV remodeling, defined as a 10% reduction in the LV end-diastolic diameter 1 week after AVR. All patients with early LV remodeling had a preoperative SV of ≥97 ml, which was the best predictor of late postoperative LVEF of ≥45% (sensitivity 98% and specificity 100%). Patients with a preoperative SV of ≥97 ml had a markedly greater event-free survival rate (92% vs 13%, p <0.001) at 3 years. In conclusion, in patients undergoing AVR for chronic severe pure AR, preoperative SV is the best predictor of LV remodeling and outcomes.

CME: long-term outcome in asymptomatic patients with severe aortic regurgitation, normal left ventricular ejection fraction, and severe left ventricular dilatation

BACKGROUND

Although the guidelines consider severe left ventricular (LV) dilatation a class IIaC indication for surgery in asymptomatic patients with severe aortic regurgitation (AR) and normal LV function, the optimal management remains controversial. We aimed to assess the LV enlargement, hypertrophy and function, and the outcomes in these patients by the presence of severe LV dilatation at baseline.

METHODS

From our 20-year database, we identified all asymptomatic patients with severe AR and LV ejection fraction (EF) >50% and ≥2 echocardiograms ≥1 year apart. LV end-diastolic diameter >70 mm or LV end-systolic diameter >50 mm or LV end-systolic diameter index >25 mm/m(2) defined severe LV dilatation. A composite end point included onset of symptoms or LV dysfunction.

RESULTS

Eighty-four patients (52 ± 18 years, 61 men) were enrolled and followed-up for 7.1 ± 5.1 years. Two groups were defined: 22 patients with and 62 patients without severe LV dilatation at baseline. The progression of LV dilatation and hypertrophy, and the LVEF at last exam were similar in both groups. Twelve of 22 and 34 of 62 patients (P = 0.59) reached the end point. Vasodilators did not modify the progression of LV enlargement/hypertrophy. Ten of 22 and 25 of 62 patients (P = 0.45) underwent surgery and had similar postoperative LV diameters, mass, EF.

CONCLUSIONS

The progression of LV enlargement/hypertrophy and outcomes in asymptomatic patients with severe AR, normal LV function, and severe LV dilatation or the postoperative LV parameters were not influenced by the severe LV dilatation, suggesting that a close follow-up could delay surgery in this population.

Quantitative echocardiographic determinants of clinical outcome in asymptomatic patients with aortic regurgitation: a prospective study

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to define the link between aortic regurgitation (AR) quantitation and clinical outcome in asymptomatic patients with AR.

BACKGROUND

Quantitative American Society of Echocardiography (QASE) thresholds are recommended for AR assessment, but impact on clinical outcome is unknown.

METHODS

We prospectively enrolled (1991 to 2003) 251 asymptomatic patients (age 60 +/- 17 years) with isolated AR and ejection fraction > or =50% with quantified AR and left ventricular (LV) volumes using Doppler-echocardiography.

RESULTS

Survival under medical management was independently determined by baseline regurgitant volume (RVol) (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.22 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.08 to 1.35] per 10 ml/beat, p = 0.002) and effective regurgitant orifice (ERO) (adjusted HR 1.52 [95% CI 1.19 to 1.91] per 10 mm(2), p = 0.002), which superseded traditional AR grading. Patients with QASE-severe AR (RVol > or =60 ml/beat or ERO > or =30 mm(2)) versus QASE-mild AR (RVol <30 ml and ERO <10 mm(2)) had lower survival (10 years: 69 +/- 9% vs. 92 +/- 4%, p = 0.05) independently of all clinical characteristics (adjusted HR 4.1 [95% CI 1.4 to 14.1], p = 0.01) and lower survival free of surgery for AR (10 years: 20 +/- 5% vs. 92 +/- 4%, p < 0.001, adjusted HR 12.9 [95% CI 5.4 to 38.5]). Cardiac events were considerably more frequent with QASE-severe versus -moderate or -mild AR (10 years: 63 +/- 8% vs. 34 +/- 6% and 21 +/- 8%, p < 0.0001). Independent determinants of cardiac events were quantitative AR grading (QASE-severe adjusted HR 5.2 [95% CI 2.2 to 14.8], p < 0.001; QASE-moderate adjusted HR 2.4 [95% CI 1.06 to 6.6], p = 0.035), which superseded traditional AR assessment (p < 0.001) and LV end-systolic volume index (ESVI) (adjusted HR 1.09 [95% CI 1.03 to 1.14 per 10 ml/m(2)], p = 0.002), which superseded LV M-mode diameters. In QASE-severe AR, patients with ESVI > or =45 versus <45 ml/m(2) had higher cardiac event rates (10 years: 87 +/- 8% vs. 40 +/- 10%, p < 0.001). Cardiac surgery for AR reduced cardiac events in patients with QASE-severe AR (adjusted HR 0.23 [95% CI 0.09 to 0.57], p = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

Echocardiographic quantitation of AR severity and ESVI provides independent and superior predictors of clinical outcome in asymptomatic patients with AR and ejection fraction > or =50% and should be widely clinically applied. Patients with QASE-severe AR and ESVI > or =45 ml/m(2) should be carefully considered for cardiac surgery, which reduces cardiac events risk.