Respiratory failure following adenosine administration

Resolution of bronchoconstriction with positive airway pressure after intravenous adenosine

Adenosine is an endogenous nucleoside that plays a major role in the pathophysiology of airway diseases, such as asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. It is also an effective drug at terminating supraventricular tachycardia and used for pharmacological stress testing with a relatively safe side effect profile. There is a contraindication for the use of adenosine in patients with asthma and a caution to use in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. We present a case of a 63-year old female patient who was treated with adenosine and subsequently went into respiratory distress. She was placed on bilevel positive airway pressure and had rapid resolution of symptoms.

Unmasking Adenosine: The Purinergic Signalling Molecule Critical to Arrhythmia Pathophysiology and Management

Adenosine was identified in 1929 and immediately recognised as having a potential role in therapy for arrhythmia because of its negative chronotropic and dromotropic effects. Adenosine entered mainstream use in the 1980s as a highly effective agent for the termination of supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) involving the atrioventricular node, as well as for its ability to unmask the underlying rhythm in other SVTs. Adenosine has subsequently been found to have applications in interventional electrophysiology. While considered a safe agent because of its short half-life, adenosine may provoke arrhythmias in the form of AF, bradyarrhythmia and ventricular tachyarrhythmia. Adenosine is also associated with bronchospasm, although this may reflect irritant-induced dyspnoea rather than true obstruction. Adenosine is linked to numerous pathologies relevant to arrhythmia predisposition, including heart failure, obesity, ischaemia and the ageing process itself. This article examines 90 years of experience with adenosine in the light of new European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of SVT.

Comparative study of the safety of regadenoson between patients with mild/moderate chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and asthma

PURPOSE

To compare the safety of regadenoson, a selective agonist of A2A adenosine receptors, combined with low-level exercise, between subjects with mild/moderate chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and asthma referred for myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI).

METHODS

We studied 116 patients, of whom 67 had COPD and 49 asthma (62 % men, mean age 68.3 ± 11.3 years, range 31 - 87 years). Patient demographics, past medical history, medications, clinical symptoms during stress and changes in blood pressure (BP) and heart rate (HR) were evaluated.

RESULTS

Both groups were comparable with regard to hypertension, dyslipidaemia, diabetes and medications with the exception of a higher rate of use of anticholinergics in patients with COPD and of antileukotrienes in asthmatics (58.2 % vs. 28.6 % and 1.5 % vs. 14.3 %, respectively; all p < 0.01). There was a higher incidence of dyspnoea in COPD patients and of headache and feeling hot in asthmatic patients (40.3 % vs. 22.4 %, 6 % vs. 18.4 % and 10.4 % vs. 26.5 %, respectively; all p < 0.05). Although there was no difference in the incidence of other adverse events, we observed a higher frequency in asthmatics of flushing, dry mouth, sweating and fatigue (1.5 % vs. 6.1 %, 14.9 % vs. 24.5 %, 0 % vs. 4.1 % and 37.3 % vs. 49 %, respectively). Adverse events were self-limiting, except in three patients who suffered persistent dyspnoea (2 of 67 COPD patients; 1 of 49 asthma patients) requiring theophylline administration. We observed no significant changes in BP among either group, but there was a tendency towards a higher increase in systolic BP in COPD patients following regadenoson administration (148.3 ± 27.6 vs. 154.6 ± 31.0 mmHg, p = 0.056).

CONCLUSION

This study showed a good safety profile in our series of COPD and asthma patients undergoing MPI. Regadenoson was well tolerated by all patients, with dyspnoea, headache and feeling hot showing differences between groups.

[Dobutamine stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in patients with peripheral artery disease]

Patients with peripheral arterial disease often have coronary heart disease, as well. However, their assessment with classical noninvasive cardiology methods is often non-diagnostic or limited. The aim of this study was to analyze the feasibility and the risks of dobutamine stress cardiovascular MRI for cardiac evaluation of patients with peripheral arterial disease. 21 patients with peripheral artery disease (mean±SD age 64.3±7.7 years) were studied prospectively with dobutamine stress cardiovascular MRI. The protocol was completed by all of 21 patients. The target heart rate was attained in 95.2% of the studies. No serious adverse event occurred. The image quality scores (1-4) for all ventricular wall segments were high (median, interquartile range) (4 [4-4]). Five patients (23.8%) have inducible wall motion abnormality. Interobserver agreement was almost perfect for wall motion scores (κ = 0.87, p<0.0001). Dobutamine stress cardiovascular MRI is feasible with low risk for the cardiological assessment of patients with peripheral arterial disease.

Safety of regadenoson, an adenosine A2A receptor agonist for myocardial perfusion imaging, in mild asthma and moderate asthma patients: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Patients with reactive airways are at risk for adenosine-induced bronchoconstriction, mediated via A(2B) and/or A(3) adenosine receptors.

METHODS AND RESULTS

To examine the effects of regadenoson, a selective adenosine A(2A) receptor agonist, on airway resistance, we conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial in asthmatic patients with a positive adenosine monophosphate challenge test. The mean ratio of the forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV(1)) at each tested time point relative to the baseline FEV(1) was significantly higher after treatment with regadenoson compared with placebo from 10 to 60 minutes after treatment. One patient had a substantial but asymptomatic FEV(1) reduction (-36.2%) after regadenoson that reversed spontaneously. The most common adverse events with regadenoson were tachycardia (66%), dizziness (53%), headache (45%), and dyspnea (34%). The mean heart rate significantly increased with regadenoson (maximum of +10.4 beats/min) versus placebo.

CONCLUSIONS

In this pilot safety study of 48 patients with mild or moderate asthma who had bronchial reactivity to adenosine monophosphate, regadenoson was safe and well tolerated.

Safety of regadenoson, a selective adenosine A2A agonist, in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (RegCOPD trial)

BACKGROUND

Patients with reactive airways are at risk for adenosine-induced bronchoconstriction, mediated via A(2B) and/or A(3) adenosine receptors.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial, we examined the safety of regadenoson, a selective adenosine A(2A) receptor agonist, in patients with moderate chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (n = 38) and patients with severe COPD (n = 11) with a baseline mean forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV(1)) of 1.74 +/- 0.50 L and 1.0 +/- 0.35 L, respectively, 37% of whom had dyspnea during activities of daily living. Patients receiving glucocorticoids or oxygen and those with pretreatment wheezing were included. Short-acting bronchodilators were withheld for at least 8 hours before treatment. No differences emerged between regadenoson and placebo on multiple lung function parameters, including repeated FEV(1) and forced vital capacity, respiratory rate, pulmonary examinations, and oxygen saturation. The mean maximum decline in FEV(1) was 0.11 +/- 0.02 L and 0.12 +/- 0.02 L (P = .55) in patients after regadenoson and placebo, respectively, and new-onset wheezing was observed in 6% and 12%, respectively (P = .33). No patient required acute treatment with bronchodilators or oxygen.

CONCLUSIONS

This pilot study showed the overall safety of regadenoson in 49 compromised outpatients with clinically stable moderate and severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Hypersensitivity of pulmonary C fibers induced by adenosine in anesthetized rats

Compelling clinical evidence implicates the potential role of adenosine in development of airway hyperresponsiveness and suggests involvement of pulmonary sensory receptors. This study was carried out to determine the effect of a low dose of adenosine infusion on sensitivity of pulmonary C-fiber afferents in anesthetized open-chest rats. Infusion of adenosine (40 microg x kg-1x min-1 i.v. for 90 s) mildly elevated baseline activity of pulmonary C fibers. However, during adenosine infusion, pulmonary C-fiber responses to chemical stimulants and lung inflation (30 cmH2O tracheal pressure) were markedly potentiated; e.g., the response to right atrial injection of capsaicin (0.25 or 0.5 microg/kg) was increased by more than fivefold (change in fiber activity = 2.64 +/- 0.67 and 16.27 +/- 3.11 impulses/s at control and during adenosine infusion, n = 13, P < 0.05), and this enhanced response returned to control in approximately 10 min. The potentiating effect of adenosine infusion was completely blocked by pretreatment with 8-cyclopentyl-1,3-dipropylxanthine (100 microg/kg), a selective antagonist of the adenosine A1 receptor, but was not affected by 3,7-dimethyl-1-propargylxanthine (1 mg/kg), an A2-receptor antagonist, or 3-ethyl-5-benzyl-2-methyl-4-phenylethynyl-6-phenyl-1,4-(+/-)-dihydropyridine-3,5-dicarboxylate (2 mg/kg), an A3-receptor antagonist. This potentiating effect was also mimicked by N6-cyclopentyladenosine (0.25 microg x kg-1 x min-1 for 90 s), a selective agonist of the adenosine A1 receptor. In conclusion, our results showed that infusion of adenosine significantly elevated the sensitivity of pulmonary C-fiber afferents in rat lungs and that this potentiating effect is likely mediated through activation of the adenosine A1 receptor.

Prehospital management of acute tachyarrhythmias

Arrhythmias are commonly encountered by emergency medical services (EMS) personnel. The potential seriousness of acute symptomatic arrhythmias necessitates thorough up-to-date training of EMS personnel. The three most common acute tachyarrhythmias, not linked to cardiac arrest, that are observed outside the hospital are paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (PSVT), atrial fibrillation with rapid ventricular response (RAF), and perfusing ventricular tachycardia (VT). Ideally, these tachyarrhythmias should be operationally defined in a manner that simplifies, particularly for EMS providers, their diagnosis and treatment. The authors recommend referring to these rhythms as regular narrow-complex tachycardia (presumed PSVT), irregularly irregular narrow-complex tachycardia (presumed RAF), or regular wide-complex tachycardia (presumed VT or aberrantly conducted PSVT). Although the value of treatments such as cardioversion is widely understood, the benefit from others, such as lidocaine, is unclear. Current preferences, recommendations, and concerns regarding the treatment of most arrhythmias outside the hospital reflect the dichotomy that sometimes exists between available evidence and actual practice.

Two deaths after prehospital use of adenosine

Two patients in the prehospital setting died immediately after receiving adenosine for presumed supraventricular tachycardia. Both patients' cardiac rhythms were atrial fibrillation rather than supraventricular tachycardia, and their unstable conditions resulted from underlying diseases-chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and pulmonary embolism-rather than the tachycardia. Misinterpretation of the cause of tachycardia as well as the electrocardiographic findings may be responsible for adverse outcomes.

Adenosine and pediatric supraventricular tachycardia in the emergency department: multicenter study and review

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To determine the frequency of successful cardioversion and the adverse effects of adenosine treatment in pediatric emergency department patients with supraventricular tachycardia (SVT).

METHODS

This was a multicenter descriptive study with both prospective (convenience sample) and retrospective (chart review) patient entry. The setting was 7 urban pediatric EDs with a yearly census range of 22,000 to 70,000 visits. Pediatric patients 18 years of age and younger who received intravenous adenosine for presumed SVT were eligible.

RESULTS

Six investigators from 7 pediatric EDs entered 82 patients with 98 presumed SVT episodes (52 prospective and 46 retrospective) into the study. Twenty-five episodes occurred in children younger than 1 year of age. Eight patients had congenital heart disease, 59 had a history of SVT, 43 were taking cardiac medications (digoxin in 27), 13 had a history of asthma, and 25 presented in compensated cardiogenic shock. A total of 193 intravenous doses of adenosine were administered; doses were classified as low (<.1 mg/kg [n=18]), medium (.1 to <.2 mg/kg [n=116]), or high (>/=.2 mg/kg [n=59]). The dose range was.03 to.5 mg/kg, and only 2 doses were higher than.3 mg/kg. A total of 95 patient-events were determined to be SVT, all but 5 of which were atrioventricular (AV) node-dependent; 3 events were ventricular tachycardia. The overall cardioversion success rate of adenosine was 72% (71/98), and that for AV node-dependent SVT was 79% (71/90). Cardioversion was successful for 4 patient-events at a low dose, 44 at a medium dose, and 23 at a high dose of adenosine. Adverse effects occurred in 22 patients, and no patient had bronchospasm or hemodynamically significant arrhythmia.

CONCLUSION

Intravenous administration of adenosine led to successful cardioversion in 72% of pediatric ED patient-events that were presumed to be SVT. A dose range of.1 to.3 mg/kg was found to be most effective. Adenosine was not associated with significant adverse effects.

Respiratory arrest during dipyridamole stress testing

There is an increasing usage of radionuclide scanning to assess myocardial perfusion, with dipyridamole, the most commonly used stress agent. Although this is an effective, and usually very safe, means by which to assess myocardial blood supply, there have been several incidents of acute bronchospasm in asthmatic patients. There have, however, been no previous reports of respiratory arrest occurring in patients with emphysema. This case illustrates the dangers of administering intravenous dipyridamole, or even adenosine, to patients with chronic lung disease.

Effect of adenosine on the management of supraventricular tachycardia by urban paramedics

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To determine the effect of the addition of adenosine, as a standing-order medication, on the prehospital management of supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) in a large urban emergency medical services (EMS) system.

DESIGN

Prospective observational case series with historical controls.

SETTING

Large urban municipal EMS system staffed by paramedics and emergency medical technicians trained to operate automatic or semiautomatic defibrillators (EMT-Ds).

PARTICIPANTS

We observed a consecutive sample of prehospital patients who presented with an initial ECG rhythm of SVT, as interpreted by the treating paramedics, between July 1 and December 31, 1993. We used patients from the same 6-month period in 1992 as our control group. Indications for treatment were chest pain, evidence of myocardial ischemia, or shock. Adenosine had been introduced as a first-line medication to be used under standing orders in cases of unstable SVT before a physician was contacted for medical control options.

RESULTS

We studied 239 cases and 228 controls. Acceptable call reports with pretreatment and posttreatment ECGs were available for 140 (59%) of the study cases and 104 (46%) of the controls. The two groups were similar in terms of age, sex, and initial vital signs. In the control group, 75 patients had indications for treatment, and 16 were treated (21%). In the study group, 127 had indications for treatment and 103 (81.1%) were treated (odds ratio, 15.83; 95% confidence interval, 7.38-34.4).

CONCLUSION

The introduction of adenosine as a standing-order medication into an urban EMS system increased the proportion of patients who received advanced life support treatment. Paramedics were able to accurately diagnose and begin treatment of SVT with adenosine without direct medical supervision.

Adenosine in acute theophylline intoxication

Although it appears that adenosine would be theoretically useful in the emergent therapy of theophylline toxicity, published clinical data supporting the efficacy and safety of using adenosine for such a situation are currently lacking. The use of adenosine also is not without some risk. In addition, the use of adenosine infusions can be relatively expensive. Until more clinical evidence can be obtained, the routine use of adenosine in the treatment of acute theophylline ingestion cannot be recommended.

Adenosine for the prehospital treatment of paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To determine the efficacy and feasibility of adenosine for the treatment of paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (PSVT) in the prehospital setting.

DESIGN

Prospective case series.

SETTING

Large, urban, advanced life support emergency medical services system.

PARTICIPANTS

One hundred twenty-nine adult patients with PSVT, as identified by paramedic personnel. Pregnant patients and those taking carbamazepine or dipyridamole were excluded.

INTERVENTIONS

Dose of 12 mg adenosine by rapid i.v. push followed by a 5-mL saline flush and a repeat dose of 12 mg adenosine i.v. push if the patient's rhythm remained unchanged.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Six-second lead II rhythm strips and vital signs were documented before and 2 minutes after the administration of adenosine. Demographic information, past medical history, medications, number of adenosine doses given, and complications were recorded by the paramedic on a case-report form. One hundred six of 129 (82%) of the case-report forms included the rhythm strips from before and after adenosine administration. Actual initial rhythms were determined by a consensus panel. The initial rhythms were PSVT in 79% (84 of 106) of patients, atrial fibrillation in 12% (13 of 106), sinus tachycardia in 5% (five of 106), atrial flutter in 2% (two of 106), and ventricular tachycardia in 2% (two of 106). Eighty-five percent (71 of 84) of patients in PSVT were successfully converted to sinus rhythms; four (5.6%) of these patients required a second 12-mg dose. One patient in atrial fibrillation spontaneously converted to normal sinus rhythm and one patient in ventricular tachycardia converted after adenosine. All other patients not initially in PSVT remained in their initial rhythm. Complications occurred in 12 of 129 patients and included chest pain (five), flushing (three), shortness of breath (two), nausea (one), anxiety (one), dizziness (one), headache (one), and seizure (one). All complications were transient and required no treatment. Prior history of PSVT was the only variable associated with a higher rate of conversion (P = .029).

CONCLUSION

Paramedics are able to accurately identify PSVT using a single lead. Adenosine is safe and effective treatment for PSVT in the prehospital setting. This series is the largest prehospital study of adenosine use to date.