Why bother educating the multi-disciplinary team and the patient--the example of prevention of lower extremity amputation in diabetes

Selecting a prospective test for early detection of diabetic polyneuropathy

Microneurolysis of entrapped peripheral nerve has the best chance of success when compression has not created significant axonal loss. The purpose of this study is to learn the best way to identify potential surgical candidates at the earliest time for intervention, by examining patients in a clinical setting using objective, electrodiagnostic nerve conduction studies (NCS), and subjective touch threshold studies, Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments (SWM) and Pressure-Specified Sensory Device™ (PSSD). Fifty-five patients with diabetic polyneuropathy over the age of 30 years were included. Neuropathy symptom score was the gold standard for statistical calculation, with a prevalence of 70%. In the symptomatic population, prevalence was 64% for NCS (n = 25), 59% for SWM (n = 43), and 88% for PSSD (n = 51). In the asymptomatic population, prevalence was 70% for NCS, 27% for SWM, and 92% for PSSD. It is concluded that the PSSD is the most sensitive device of those tested for identifying peripheral neuropathy in an at risk population of patients.

Patient education for preventing diabetic foot ulceration

BACKGROUND

Ulceration of the feet, which can result in loss of limbs and even death, is one of the major health problems for people with diabetes mellitus.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of patient education on the prevention of foot ulcers in patients with diabetes mellitus.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched The Cochrane Wounds Group Specialised Register (searched 03 September 2014); The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2014, Issue 8).

SELECTION CRITERIA

Prospective randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated educational programmes for preventing foot ulcers in people with diabetes mellitus.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently undertook data extraction and assessment of risk of bias. Primary end points were foot ulceration or ulcer recurrence and amputation.

MAIN RESULTS

Of the 12 RCTs included, the effect of patient education on primary end points was reported in only five. Pooling of outcome data was precluded by marked, mainly clinical, heterogeneity. One of the RCTs showed reduced incidence of foot ulceration (risk ratio (RR) 0.31, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.14 to 0.66) and amputation (RR 0.33, 95% CI 0.15 to 0.76) during one-year follow-up of diabetes patients at high risk of foot ulceration after a one-hour group education session. However, one similar study, with lower risk of bias, did not confirm this finding (RR amputation 0.98, 95% CI 0.41 to 2.34; RR ulceration 1.00, 95% CI 0.70 to 1.44). Three other studies, also did not demonstrate any effect of education on the primary end points, but were most likely underpowered. Patients' foot care knowledge was improved in the short term in five of eight RCTs in which this outcome was assessed, as was patients' self-reported self-care behaviour in the short term in seven of nine RCTs. Callus, nail problems and fungal infections improved in only one of five RCTs. Only one of the included RCTs was at low risk of bias.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

In some trials, foot care knowledge and self reported patient behaviour seem to be positively influenced by education in the short term. Yet, based on the only two sufficiently powered studies reporting the effect of patient education on primary end points, we conclude that there is insufficient robust evidence that limited patient education alone is effective in achieving clinically relevant reductions in ulcer and amputation incidence.

The efficacy of diabetic foot care education

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

To survey the efficacy of education about factors that influence the learning process and behaviour of diabetics following a nursing interventional project in diabetic foot care education.

BACKGROUND

Educating diabetics can change their behaviour, which may contribute to the prevention of diabetic foot ulcer and amputation. However, there is little information on the factors that contribute to effectiveness of foot care education.

DESIGN

Survey.

METHODS

The data before education were collected by using structured assessment based on a practical reasoning scheme. The interventional diabetic foot care education project immediately followed. We used verbal and written patient education material. After education (six months), we used a questionnaire by postadministration. The data were analysed using content analysis, descriptive statistics and inferential statistics.

RESULTS

We discovered a rise of knowledge, willingness and motivation to learn and to change the behaviour of diabetics after education. The clinical parameters (weight, Body Mass Index, blood pressure) demonstrated a statistically significant positive change six months after education.

CONCLUSION

The findings after education show a rise in knowledge, willingness and motivation, which are important factors that contribute to changing behaviour of diabetics in diabetic foot care. After education, we identified better results in terms of weight and blood pressure, both of which play a role in the prevention of diabetic ulcer.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

The education valuable tool ensures knowledge, motivation and willingness to change behaviour in order to prevent diabetic foot complications of diabetics. By using structured assessment, nurses are able to modify their educational interventions.

Patient education for preventing diabetic foot ulceration

BACKGROUND

Ulceration of the feet, which can result in loss of limbs and even death, is one of the major health problems for people with diabetes mellitus.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of patient education on the prevention of foot ulcers in patients with diabetes mellitus.

SEARCH METHODS

Eligible studies were identified by searching The Cochrane Wounds Group Specialised Register (searched 1 August 2012); The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2012, Issue 7); Ovid MEDLINE (2009 to July Week 3 2012); Ovid MEDLINE (In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations, July 31, 2012); Ovid EMBASE (2009 to 2012 Week 30); and EBSCO CINAHL (2009 to 26 July 2012).

SELECTION CRITERIA

Prospective randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated educational programmes for preventing foot ulcers in people with diabetes mellitus.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently undertook data extraction and assessment of risk of bias. Primary end points were foot ulceration or ulcer recurrence and amputation.

MAIN RESULTS

Of the 12 RCTs included, the effect of patient education on primary end points was reported in only five. Pooling of outcome data was precluded by marked, mainly clinical, heterogeneity. One of the RCTs showed reduced incidence of foot ulceration (risk ratio (RR) 0.31, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.14 to 0.66) and amputation (RR 0.33, 95% CI 0.15 to 0.76) during one-year follow-up of diabetes patients at high risk of foot ulceration after a one-hour group education session. However, one similar study, with lower risk of bias, did not confirm this finding (RR amputation 0.98, 95% CI 0.41 to 2.34; RR ulceration 1.00, 95% CI 0.70 to 1.44). Three other studies, also did not demonstrate any effect of education on the primary end points, but were most likely underpowered. Patients' foot care knowledge was improved in the short term in five of eight RCTs in which this outcome was assessed, as was patients' self-reported self-care behaviour in the short term in seven of nine RCTs. Callus, nail problems and fungal infections improved in only one of five RCTs. Only one of the included RCTs was at low risk of bias.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

In some trials, foot care knowledge and self reported patient behaviour seem to be positively influenced by education in the short term. Yet, based on the only two sufficiently powered studies reporting the effect of patient education on primary end points, we conclude that there is insufficient robust evidence that limited patient education alone is effective in achieving clinically relevant reductions in ulcer and amputation incidence.

Patient education for preventing diabetic foot ulceration

Treatment of diabetic foot ulceration is very challenging, costly and often needs to be of long duration. This leads to substantial economic burden. Population-based research suggests that a meaningful reduction of the incidence of amputations caused by diabetes mellitus has already been achieved since the St. Vincent resolution in 1989. Still, it cannot be inferred from these studies that the current preventive efforts are (cost-)effective because reduction of amputation incidence can also be the result of improvements in ulcer treatment. Nevertheless, education of people with diabetes is widely advocated and implemented in standard practice. Despite the fact that preventive interventions are often combined in daily practice, there is little scientific evidence demonstrating the effect of those efforts. In systematically reviewing the evidence, there is insufficient evidence that limited patient education alone is effective in achieving clinically relevant reductions in ulcer and amputation incidence. To date, high quality evidence that more complex interventions including patient education can prevent diabetic foot ulceration is not available either. This, however, should be interpreted as lack of evidence rather than evidence of no effect. Future directions for research and practice may be to concentrate preventive effort on those patients who appear to be at highest risk of foot ulceration after careful screening and selection.

Ten years of a multidisciplinary diabetic foot team approach in Sao Paulo, Brazil

Diabetes mellitus can cause devastating foot problems including loss of protective sensation with subsequent ulcerations and amputations. The natural history and pathophysiology of diabetic foot ulcers is best understood and managed by a multiprofessional team approach. The main factors for prevention and treatment of these devastating diabetic foot conditions are shown, with special attention to education of the patient. This approach decreases the morbidity of the disease, besides its economical and social feasibility.

Patient education for preventing diabetic foot ulceration

BACKGROUND

Ulceration of the feet, which can result in loss of limbs and even death, is one of the major health problems for people with diabetes mellitus.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of patient education on the prevention of foot ulcers in patients with diabetes mellitus.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Eligible studies were identified by searching the Cochrane Wounds Group Specialised Register (22 December 2009), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (Cochrane Library 2009 Issue 4 ), Ovid MEDLINE (1950 to November Week 3 2009), Ovid MEDLINE In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations (Searched 22/12/09), Ovid EMBASE (1980 to 2009 Week 51) and EBSCO CINAHL (1982 to December 22 2009).

SELECTION CRITERIA

Prospective randomised controlled trials (RCTs) which evaluated educational programmes for preventing foot ulcers in people with diabetes mellitus. There was no restriction on language of the publications.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently undertook data extraction and assessment of risk of bias. Primary end-points were foot ulceration or ulcer recurrence and amputation.

MAIN RESULTS

Eleven RCTs were included. Three studies described the effect of foot care education as part of general diabetes education compared with usual care. Two studies examined the effect of foot care education tailored to educational needs compared with no intervention. Finally, six studies described the effect of intensive compared with brief educational interventions. Pooling of outcome data was precluded by marked, mainly clinical, heterogeneity. Four RCTs assessed the effect of patient education on primary end-points: foot ulceration and amputations. One of these studies reported a statistically significant benefit of one hour group education after one year of follow-up in people with diabetes who were at high risk for foot ulceration; RR amputation 0.33 (95% CI 0.15 to 0.76); RR ulceration 0.31 (95% CI 0.14 to 0.66), however this study was at high risk of bias and may have overestimated the effect due to a unit of analysis error. One similar, but methodologically superior study did not confirm this finding; RR amputation 0.98 (95% CI 0.41 to 2.34); RR ulceration 1.00 (95% CI 0.70 to 1.44). The other two studies did not detect any effect of education on ulcer incidence or amputation but were underpowered. Patients' foot care knowledge was improved in the short term in five of eight RCTs in which this outcome was assessed, as was patients' self reported self care behaviour in the short term in seven of nine RCTs. The effects on callus, nail problems and fungal infections were described in five of the included studies, of which only two reported temporary improvements after an educational intervention.Only one of the included RCTs was considered to be at low risk of bias.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Most of the RCTs included in this review are at high or unclear risk of bias. In some trials, foot care knowledge and self reported patient behaviour seem to be positively influenced by education in the short term. This, however, must be viewed with caution. The ultimate goal of educational interventions is preventing foot ulceration and amputation but only four RCTs reported these outcomes and only two reported sufficient data to examine this. Based on these two studies, we conclude that there is insufficient robust evidence that limited patient education alone is effective in achieving clinically relevant reductions in ulcer and amputation incidence.Future research should focus on evaluating the effect of more comprehensive and/or intensive prevention strategies which may also include patient education (complex interventions).

Patients' perspectives on foot complications in type 2 diabetes: a qualitative study

BACKGROUND

Foot ulceration is a major health problem for people with diabetes. To minimise the risk of ulceration, patients are advised to perform preventive foot self-care.

AIM

To explore beliefs about diabetic foot complications and everyday foot self-care practices among people with type 2 diabetes.

DESIGN OF STUDY

Qualitative study using one-to-one interviews.

SETTING

A suburban primary care health centre.

METHOD

Semi-structured interviews with a purposive sample of adults with type 2 diabetes but with no experience of foot ulceration.

RESULTS

Most participants were unsure of what a foot ulcer is and unaware of the difficulties associated with ulcer healing. Prevention of accidental damage to the skin was not considered a priority, as few participants knew that this is a common cause of foot ulceration. Although it was recognised that lower-limb amputation is more common in people with diabetes, this was perceived to be predominantly caused by poor blood supply to the feet and unrelated to foot ulceration. Therefore, preventive foot care focused on stimulating blood circulation, for example by walking barefoot. Consequently, some of the behaviours participants considered beneficial for foot health could potentially increase the risk of ulceration. In some cases the uptake of advice regarding preventive foot care was hampered because participants found it difficult to communicate with health professionals.

CONCLUSION

Patients with type 2 diabetes may have beliefs about foot complications that differ from medical evidence. Such illness beliefs may play a role in foot-related behaviours that have previously been unrecognised. Health professionals need to explore and address the beliefs underlying patients' foot self-care practices.

The Neuropad test: a visual indicator test for human diabetic neuropathy

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS

The commercially available Neuropad test was developed as a simple visual indicator test to evaluate diabetic neuropathy. It uses a colour change to define the integrity of skin sympathetic cholinergic innervation. We compared the results of Neuropad assessment in the foot with established measures of somatic and autonomic neuropathy.

METHODS

Fifty-seven diabetic patients underwent Neuropad assessment, quantitative sensory and autonomic function testing, and evaluation of intra-epidermal nerve fibre density in foot skin biopsies.

RESULTS

Neuropad responses correlated with the neuropathy disability score (r(s)=0.450, p<0.001), neuropathic symptom score (r(s)=0.288, p=0.03), cold detection threshold (r(s)=0.394, p = 0.003), heat-as-pain perception threshold visual analogue score 0.5 (r(s)=0.279, p=0.043) and deep-breathing heart rate variability (r(s)= -0.525, p<0.001). Intra-epidermal nerve fibre density (fibres/mm) compared with age- and sex-matched control subjects (11.06+/-0.82) was non-significantly reduced (7.37+/-0.93) in diabetic patients with a normal Neuropad response and significantly reduced in patients with a patchy (5.01+/-0.93) or absent (5.02+/-0.77) response (p=0.02). The sensitivity of an abnormal Neuropad response in detecting clinical neuropathy (neuropathy disability score >or=5) was 85% (negative predictive value 71%) and the specificity was 45% (positive predictive value 69%).

CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION

The Neuropad test may be a simple indicator for screening patients with diabetic neuropathy.

The diabetic foot: perspectives from Chennai, South India

Foot ulcers are a significant complication of diabetes mellitus and often precede lower extremity amputation. The most frequent underlying etiologies are neuropathy, trauma, deformity, high plantar pressures, and peripheral arterial disease. Loss of protective sensation is the primary factor in foot ulceration in diabetics. Mechanical stresses resulting from joint deformity, limited joint mobility, and poor foot care/footwear are important in the causal pathway of both neuropathic and ischemic ulcers. It was shown that the recurrence of foot infection was common among Indian diabetic patients (52%). A lesser prevalence of peripheral vascular disease (13%) among Indians was noted when compared with those in Western countries (48%). Smoking increases the risk by reducing blood circulation in the legs and reducing sensation in the feet. Prompt and aggressive treatment of diabetic foot ulcers can often prevent exacerbation of the problem and eliminate the potential for amputation. The aim of the therapy should be early intervention to allow prompt healing of the lesion and prevent recurrence once it is healed. Multidisciplinary management programs that focus on prevention, education, regular foot examinations, aggressive intervention, and optimal use of therapeutic footwear have demonstrated significant reductions in the history of lower extremity amputations.

Bedside neuropathy disability score compared to quantitative sensory testing for measurement of diabetic neuropathy in children, adolescents, and young adults with type 1 diabetes

BACKGROUND

While regular yearly screening for diabetic retinopathy and nephropathy is well established in patients with diabetes mellitus, there are no standardized diagnostic tests for diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN). In the present study, we compared the bedside neuropathy disability score (NDS) with quantitative sensory testing (QST) for screening for DPN in youth with type 1 diabetes mellitus.

METHODS

One hundred sixty-six patients aged 10 to 34 years (median 21 years) were evaluated for DPN by the NDS and QST. Quantitative sensory testing was also done in 43 healthy, age-matched controls. Diabetic peripheral neuropathy grade by both methods was correlated with disease-related variables.

RESULTS

On QST, the diabetic group had significantly higher mean scores for vibration (P<.001) and warm sensation (P<.01) than controls, and lower scores for cold sensation (P<.05); however, there was a great degree of overlap. The NDS significantly correlated with the vibration threshold, but not with the warm and cold thresholds. The NDS significantly correlated with age at testing, diabetes duration, and long-term and current HbA1c levels (P<.001), and with the presence of microalbuminuria and diabetic retinopathy (P<.001). Analysis of the QST variables yielded significant correlations of vibration and warm sensation with age at testing (P<.001, P<.05, respectively) and of vibration with diabetes duration (P<.001) and retinopathy (P=.05); none of the quantitative tests correlated with glycemic control.

CONCLUSIONS

The stronger association of the NDS with glycemic control and other microvascular complications compared to the perception thresholds, and its shorter time of performance and lack of costly equipment, may make the NDS the preferred method for measuring DPN in this population.

The neuropathic diabetic foot

Diabetic foot problems are common throughout the world, and result in major medical, social and economic consequences for the patients, their families, and society. Foot ulcers are likely to be of neuropathic origin and, therefore, are eminently preventable. Individuals with the greatest risk of ulceration can easily be identified by careful clinical examination of their feet: education and frequent follow-up is indicated for these patients. When infection complicates a foot ulcer, the combination can be limb-threatening, or life-threatening. Infection is defined clinically, but wound cultures assist in identification of causative pathogens. Tissue specimens are strongly preferred to wound swabs for wound cultures. Antimicrobial therapy should be guided by culture results, and although such therapy may cure the infection, it does not heal the wound. Alleviation of the mechanical load on ulcers (offloading) should always be a part of treatment. Plantar neuropathic ulcers typically heal in 6 weeks with nonremovable casts, because pressure at the ulcer site is mitigated and compliance is enforced. The success of other approaches to offloading similarly depends on the patient's adherence to the strategy used for pressure relief.

Changing perspectives in diabetic foot ulcer management

Diabetic foot ulceration is a serious complication of diabetes mellitus; it is the cause of more than half of nontraumatic lower limb amputations. Diabetic foot ulcers are the major cause of hospital admission for diabetic patients. Treatment costs are high. There have been advances in managing diabetic foot ulceration with the development of new dressings, growth factors, skin substitutes, and other novel approaches to stimulating wound healing. The management of vascular disease in the patient with diabetes mellitus is an essential and important consideration. However, the need for a multidisciplinary team to provide good foot care to diabetic patients is still vital for the prevention and treatment of diabetic foot ulceration.

Patient education for preventing diabetic foot ulceration

BACKGROUND

Ulceration of the feet, which can result in loss of limbs and even death, is one of the major health problems for people with diabetes mellitus.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effectiveness of patient education on the prevention of foot ulcers in patients with diabetes mellitus.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Eligible studies were identified by searching the Cochrane Wounds Group Specialised Register, (September 2004) and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library Issue 3, 2004).

SELECTION CRITERIA

Prospective randomised controlled trials (RCTs) which evaluated educational programmes for the prevention of foot ulcers in people with diabetes mellitus. There was no restriction on language of the publications.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers undertook data extraction and assessment of study quality independently.

MAIN RESULTS

Nine RCTs were included. Four trials compared the effect of intensive with brief educational interventions; two of these reported clinical endpoints. One study involving high-risk patients reported a reduction in ulcer incidence (Peto OR: 0.28 (95% CI 0.13 - 0.59)) and amputation rate (Peto OR: 0.32 (95% CI 0.14 - 0.71)) after one year. The other RCT did not find an effect at seven years follow-up. Participants' foot care knowledge significantly improved with education in two trials. In one trial foot care knowledge improved significantly in the control group, in contrast to the intervention group. Non-calcaneal callus was significantly reduced by education in one trial. One RCT did not find that patient foot care education, as part of a general diabetes education program, reduced foot ulceration compared with usual care. Patient education as part of a complex intervention, targeted at both people with diabetes and doctors, reduced the number of serious foot lesions at one year in one RCT (OR: 0.41(95% CI 0.16 -1.00)) and improved foot care behaviour. Evidence from three RCTs comparing the effect of patient-tailored education in addition to usual care was conflicting.The methodological quality of the nine included RCTs was poor. The internal validity score (range 0 - 10) of individual RCTs ranged from 2 to 5.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

RCTs evaluating education for people with diabetes, aimed at preventing diabetic foot ulceration, are mostly of poor methodological quality. Weak evidence suggests that patient education may reduce foot ulceration and amputations, especially in high-risk patients. Foot care knowledge and behaviour of patients seem positively influenced by patient education in the short term. Because of conflicting results and the methodological shortcomings more RCTs are needed.

National survey of pharmacist certified diabetes educators

We sought to determine the demographics of pharmacists who were certified diabetes educators (CDEs) and information about their training, professional affiliations, and types of diabetes education services that they provide. We also queried these pharmacists about clinical activities, reimbursement, impact of certification, and intent to pursue CDE recertification. A list of pharmacists who were CDEs as of August 31, 2000, was obtained from the National Certification Board for Diabetes Educators. We then sent a six-page anonymous survey to 415 pharmacist CDEs; 233 surveys (56.1%) were returned. Of these respondents, 140 are women and 93 are men, with a mean age of 41.5 years. Most reside in Southern or Western states. Average time since pharmacist licensure was 17 years, and average time as a CDE was 5 years. Most had completed postgraduate training, including residencies and/or fellowships; 52.8% had faculty appointments; 46.7% stated they were billing for their services; and 45.9% were obtaining reimbursement. Most pharmacists (84.4%) stated that they intended to pursue CDE recertification. Providing details about pharmacist CDEs and their clinical activities may motivate other pharmacists to pursue this credential. Pharmacists are often the most accessible of all health care providers, and earning the CDE credential may be an important contribution to diabetes care and education.

Patient education for preventing diabetic foot ulceration. A systematic review

OBJECTIVE

Ulceration of the feet, which can result in loss of limbs and death, is a major health problem for people with diabetes mellitus. The objective of this review is to assess the effectiveness of patient education to prevent diabetic foot ulcers.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

We conducted a systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated educational programmes for the prevention of foot ulcers in people with diabetes mellitus. We used standard search methods of the Cochrane "Wounds Groups". Two reviewers working independently extracted data and assessed study quality.

RESULTS

The methodologic quality of the 8 included RCTs was poor. The internal validity score (range 0-10) of individual RCTs ranged from 2 to 4. Four trials compared the effect of intensive with brief educational interventions; 2 of these reported clinical endpoints. One study involving high-risk patients reported a reduction in ulcer incidence (OR 0.28, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.13-0.59) and amputation rate (OR 0.32, 95% CI 0.14-0.71) after 1 year. The other RCT did not find an effect after 7 years of follow-up. Two trials showed that participants' foot care knowledge significantly improved with education. In one trial, foot care knowledge was significantly worse at 6 months, although foot care behavior improved significantly. One RCT, that compared patient foot care education as part of a general diabetes education program to usual care, showed no reduction in the risk of foot ulceration. In one RCT, patient education as part of a complex intervention targeted at both people with diabetes and doctors reduced the prevalence of serious foot lesions at 1 year (OR 0.41, 95% CI 0.16-1.00) and improved foot care behavior. Evidence from two RCTs comparing the effect of patient-tailored education in addition to usual care was conflicting.

SUMMARY

Evidence, limited by poor methodologic quality and conflicting results, suggests that patient education may have positive but short-lived effects on foot care knowledge and behavior of patients and may reduce foot ulceration and amputations, especially in high-risk patients. High-quality randomized controlled trials are needed to establish the efficacy of patient education to prevent diabetic foot ulcerations.

[Knowledge of the diabetic patient on foot care]

The objective of this research is to evaluate how much the clients that frequently went to the Diabetes Ambulatory, knew about their own ill, and the feet care. In the sample--diabetes type 2--the majority were people with more than fifty years old and 71.8% were diabetics for more than ten years. So the conclusion that could be taken is that the clients knew about the care that they must have with their feet to don't have complications, but the "own care" is not well done. To insert it in the rightly on their day-by-day they must have access to the information about diabetes, participation of the family, motivation and their own ability.

A framework for the evaluation of Internet-based diabetes management

BACKGROUND

While still in its infancy, Internet-based diabetes management shows great promise for growth. However, the following aspects must be considered: what are the key metrics for the evaluation of a diabetes-management site? how should these sites grow in the future and what services should they offer?

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this paper is to examine the needs of the patient and the health care professional in an Internet-based diabetes-management solution and how these needs are translated into services offered.

METHODS

An evaluation framework was constructed based on a literature review that identified the requirements for an Internet-based-diabetes-management solution. The requirements were grouped into 5 categories: Monitoring, Information, Personalization, Communication, and Technology. Two of the market leaders (myDiabetes and LifeMasters) were selected and were evaluated with the framework. The Web sites were evaluated independently by 5 raters using the evaluation framework. All evaluations were performed from November 1, 2001 through December 15, 2001.

RESULTS

The agreement level between raters ranged from 60% to 100%. The multi-rater reliability (kappa) was 0.75 for myDiabetes and 0.65 for LifeMasters, indicating substantial agreement. The results of the evaluations indicate that LifeMasters is a more-complete solution than myDiabetes in all dimensions except Information, where both sites were equivalent. LifeMasters satisfied 32 evaluation criteria while myDiabetes satisfied 24 evaluation criteria, out of a possible 40 in the framework.

CONCLUSIONS

The framework is based on the recognition that the management of diabetes via the Internet is based on several integrated dimensions: Monitoring, Information, Personalization, Communication, and Technology. A successful diabetes-management system should efficiently integrate all dimensions. The evaluation found that LifeMasters is successful in integrating the health care professional in the management of diabetes and that MyDiabetes is quite effective in providing a communication channel for community creation (however, communication with the health care professional is lacking).

Evaluation of three screening tests and a risk assessment model for diagnosing peripheral neuropathy in the diabetes clinic

OBJECTIVE

with the aim of evaluating predictive power, three simple screening tests as alternates to nerve conduction tests for diagnosing diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) were investigated. Results of the screening tests, along with the subjects' demographic and clinical characteristics, were planned as the variables for the development of a risk assessment tool for predicting DPN.

DESIGN

this is a cross-sectional multi-group comparison study. The study utilized a predictive model derived from one subset of the study population, and prospectively tested in the other subset to predict the presence of neuropathy.

SETTING

Diabetic Neuropathy Research Clinic of the Toronto General Hospital and University Health Network in Toronto, Ontario, Canada from June 1998 to August 1999.

SAMPLE POPULATION

data come from 478 subjects consisting of non-diabetic reference subjects, and patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus.

OUTCOMES MEASURES

nerve conduction studies (NCS) comprised the primary defined outcome. The three screening sensory tests examined in the study were the Semmes-Weinstein 10 g monofilament examination (SWME), superficial pain sensation, and vibration by the on-off method.

RESULTS

the three screening tests are significantly and positively correlated with NCS. An increase in the number of insensate responses in the screening test is associated with an increase in the abnormal NCS score. The strength of the association between NCS and each sensory test was greater when the neuropathy severity stage of the subject was added to the model. Both the SWME and vibration by the on-off method tests demonstrated sufficient statistical power to differentiate non-diabetic control subjects from subjects with diabetes, as well as to differentiate subjects with diabetes with and without neuropathy. These two tests, when compared with NCS, also demonstrated acceptable diagnostic performance characteristics in terms of high sensitivity and specificity, total number of correctly predicted cases, and receiver-operating characteristic curves.

CONCLUSION

this data, through the development of a model involving training and validation sets, demonstrates that the knowledge of clinical risk factors alters the interpretation of sensory tests for DPN. This finding lends further support to the validity of simple sensory testing maneuvers in the conditional diagnosis of DPN. We recommend annual screening with either the SWME or vibration by the on-off method in the primary care and diabetes clinics.

Simple screening tests for peripheral neuropathy in the diabetes clinic

OBJECTIVE

The utility of rapid and reliable sensory tests appropriate for the diagnosis of neuropathy in the diabetes clinic, rather than as prognostic tools for the prediction of foot complications, has been unclear because of limitations inherent in previous studies. Although clinical practice guidelines recommend annual screening for neuropathy, they are unable to support specific recommendations for screening maneuvers because of a lack of evidence for the validity of screening tests in the medical literature. The objective of this study was to assess the operating characteristics of four simple sensory screening maneuvers as compared with standardized electrophysiological tests in the diagnosis of distal symmetrical polyneuropathy.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

We assessed four simple tests (the 10-g Semmes-Weinstein monofilament examination [SWME], superficial pain sensation, vibration testing by the on-off method, and vibration testing by the timed method) in 478 subjects with independent blinded evaluations compared against the criterion standard of nerve conduction studies. We present receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves, positive and negative likelihood ratios, and sensitivity and specificity values for each test.

RESULTS

The four simple screening maneuvers reveal similar operating characteristics. Cutoff points by ROC curve analyses reveal that a positive or abnormal test is represented by five incorrect responses of eight stimuli applied. A negative or normal test is represented by one or fewer incorrect responses of eight stimuli applied. By these criteria, the point estimates of the positive likelihood ratios for vibration testing by the on-off method, vibration testing by the timed method, the SWME, and superficial pain sensation test are 26.6, 18.5, 10.2, and 9.2, respectively. The point estimates of the negative likelihood ratios are 0.33, 0.51, 0.34, and 0.50, respectively The screening tests showed comparable sensitivity and specificity results. The 10-g SWME, superficial pain test, and vibration testing by the on-off method are rapid, each requiring approximately 60 s to administer. The timed vibration test takes longer, and the interpretation is more complicated. The combination of two simple tests (e.g., the 10-g SWME and vibration testing by the on-off method) does not add value to each individual screening test.

CONCLUSIONS

Annual screening for diabetic neuropathy should be conducted using superficial pain sensation testing, SWME, or vibration testing by the on-off method. The reported operating characteristics for each sensory modality can be applied to positive findings on the physical examination of individual patients to predict the likelihood of neuropathy.

Patient education for preventing diabetic foot ulceration

BACKGROUND

Ulceration of the feet, which can result in loss of limbs and even death, is one of the major health problems for people with diabetes mellitus.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effectiveness of patient education on the prevention of foot ulcers in patients with diabetes mellitus.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Eligible studies were identified by searching the Wounds Group Specialised Trials Register, which is compiled from regular searches of the major health care databases including MEDLINE, Cinahl and EMBASE, hand searching of wound care journals and relevant conference proceedings. For this review the Register was searched up to March 2001.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Prospective randomised controlled trials (RCTs) which evaluated educational programmes for the prevention of foot ulcers in people with diabetes mellitus. There was no restriction on language of the publications.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data extraction and assessment of study quality were undertaken by two reviewers independently.

MAIN RESULTS

The methodological quality of the 8 included RCTs was poor. The internal validity score (range 0 - 10) of individual RCTs ranged from 2 to 4. Four trials compared the effect of intensive with brief educational interventions; 2 of these reported clinical endpoints. One study involving high-risk patients reported a reduction in ulcer incidence (Peto OR: 0.28 (95% CI 0.13,0.59)) and amputation rate (Peto OR: 0.32 (0.14,0.71)) after 1 year. The other RCT did not find an effect at seven years follow-up. Participants' foot care knowledge significantly improved with education in 2 trials. In one trial, foot care knowledge was significantly worse at 6 months, although foot care behaviour improved significantly. Non-calcaneal callus was significantly reduced by education in one trial. One RCT did not find that patient foot care education, as part of a general diabetes education program reduced foot ulceration compared with usual care. Patient education as part of a complex intervention targeted at both people with diabetes and doctors reduced the number of serious foot lesions at one year, in one RCT (OR: 0.41(0.16-1.00)) and improved foot care behaviour. Evidence from 2 RCTs comparing the effect of patient-tailored education in addition to usual care was conflicting.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

RCTs evaluating education for people with diabetes, aimed at preventing diabetic foot ulceration, are mostly of poor methodological quality. Existing data suggests that patient education may reduce foot ulceration and amputations, especially in high-risk patients. Foot care knowledge and behaviour of patients seem positively influenced by patient education in the short term. Because of conflicting results and the methodological shortcomings more RCTs are needed.

Nontraumatic lower extremity amputations in the Medicare end-stage renal disease population

BACKGROUND

Nontraumatic lower limb amputation is a serious complication of both diabetic neuropathy and peripheral vascular disease. Many people with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) suffer from advanced progression of these diseases. This study presents descriptive information on the rate of lower limb amputation among people with ESRD who are covered by the Medicare program.

METHODS

Using hospital bill data for the years 1991 through 1994 from the Health Care Financing Administration's ESRD program management and medical information system (PMMIS), amputations were based on ICD9 coding. These hospitalizations were then linked back to the PMMIS enrollment database for calculation of rates.

RESULTS

The rate of lower limb amputation increased during the four-year period from 4.8 per 100 person years in 1991 to 6.2 in 1994. Among persons whose renal failure was attributed to diabetic nephropathy, the rates in 1991 and 1994 were 11.8 and 13.8, respectively. The rate among diabetic persons with ESRD was 10 times as great as among the diabetic population at large. Two thirds died within two years following the first amputation.

CONCLUSIONS

The ESRD population is at an extremely high risk of lower limb amputation. Coordinated programs to screen for high-risk feet and to provide regular foot care for those at high risk combined with guidelines for treatment and referral of ulceration are needed.

A comparative study of the Podotrack, a simple semiquantitative plantar pressure measuring device, and the optical pedobarograph in the assessment of pressures under the diabetic foot

AIMS

To test the Podotrack, a simple inexpensive semiquantitative footprint mat, for potential use as a screening tool for high plantar pressures, against the optical pedobarograph (a computerized device).

METHODS

The Podotrack was superimposed on the pedobarograph for simultaneous measurement of pressures from both systems. Three independent observers quantified the pressures of Podotrack footprints from healthy controls and diabetic patients, both before (n=164) and after (n=183) training. The sensitivity of the Podotrack to identify high pressure areas measured by the pedobarograph (> 12.3 kg/cm2) was 78.7%, 45.8% and 44.3% (observer A, B and C) before training, but improved to 96.2%, 92.4% and 91.1% after training (P<0.01). Specificity for all three observers was more than 90% before and after training. Inter-observer agreement improved significantly after training (P<0.001).

CONCLUSION

After a simple training of the observers, the Podotrack identified approximately all high pressure areas, suggesting that the Podotrack could be a useful screening tool to identify areas at risk of ulceration in diabetic patients. We recommend a standard training package for new Podotrack users, to optimize identification of diabetic patients at risk of foot ulceration.