Group intervention with pre-recovery patients

Group therapy for substance use disorders: what do we know?

Although group therapy is the most prevalent treatment modality for substance use disorders, an up-to-date review of treatment outcome literature does not exist. A search of the literature yielded 24 treatment outcome studies comparing group therapy to other treatment conditions. These studies fell into one of six research design categories: (1) group therapy versus no group therapy; (2) group therapy versus individual therapy; (3) group therapy plus individual therapy versus group therapy alone; (4) group therapy plus individual therapy versus individual therapy alone; (5) group therapy versus another group therapy with different content or theoretical orientation; and (6) more group therapy versus less group therapy. In general, treatment outcome studies did not demonstrate differences between group and individual modalities, and no single type of group therapy reliably demonstrated greater efficacy than others. Unique methodological and logistical hurdles encountered in research on group therapy for substance use disorders, as well as considerations for future research, are also discussed.

Substance abuse treatment for "hazardous users": an early intervention

A six-session cognitive behavioral protocol has been developed for substance abusers who meet the description "hazardous users." This category includes individuals evidencing mild to moderate use of alcohol or other drugs, whose lifestyles are minimally disrupted, or who are displaying signs of problem use or abuse, but are unwilling to enter intensive treatment. The treatment model is nonconfrontational and is designed to motivate the individual to recognize the problems associated with his or her substance use and initiate treatment-seeking behavior. The intervention may be particularly useful in situations where employees have tested positive for substances but deny having a problem, where friends or family members report help is needed but the individual denies any problem, or where an alcohol or other drug problem is clearly evidenced but the individual doesn't acknowledge a problem. A positive outcome is indicated by the client taking action which is consistent with an increased awareness of the problem as conceptualized by Prochaska and DiClemente (1982). This model is an alternative to the traditional confrontational models of "breaking through denial." The philosophies employed by William Miller and associates and by the Matrix treatment models form the basis of the intervention.