Modelling and modification of the binding site of endothelin and other receptors

Molecular mechanism of 7TM receptor activation--a global toggle switch model

The multitude of chemically highly different agonists for 7TM receptors apparently do not share a common binding mode or active site but nevertheless act through induction of a common molecular activation mechanism. A global toggle switch model is proposed for this activation mechanism to reconcile the accumulated biophysical data supporting an outward rigid-body movement of the intracellular segments, as well as the recent data derived from activating metal ion sites and tethered ligands, which suggests an opposite, inward movement of the extracellular segments of the transmembrane helices. According to this model, a vertical see-saw movement of TM-VI-and to some degree TM-VII-around a pivot corresponding to the highly conserved prolines will occur during receptor activation, which may involve the outer segment of TM-V in an as yet unclear fashion. Small-molecule agonists can stabilize such a proposed active conformation, where the extracellular segments of TM-VI and -VII are bent inward toward TM-III, by acting as molecular glue deep in the main ligand-binding pocket between the helices, whereas larger agonists, peptides, and proteins can stabilize a similar active conformation by acting as Velcro at the extracellular ends of the helices and the connecting loops.

Strategies for positioning fluorescent probes and crosslinkers on formyl peptide ligands

Chemoattractant receptors represent a major subset of the G-protein coupled receptor (GPCR) family. One of the best characterized, the N-formyl peptide receptor (FPR), participates in host defense responses of neutrophils. The features of the ligand which regulate its interaction with the FPR are well-known. By manipulating these features we have developed new ligands to probe structural and mechanistic aspects of the peptide-receptor interaction. Three ligand groups have been developed: 1) ligands containing a Lys residue located in positions 2 through 7 that can be conjugated to FITC (N-formyl-Met1-Lys2-Phe3-Phe4, N-formyl-Met1-Leu2-Lys3-Phe4, N-formyl-Met1-Leu2-Phe3-Lys4, N-formyl-Met1-Leu2-Phe3-Phe4-Lys5, N-formyl-nLeu1-Leu2-Phe3-nLeu4-Tyr5-Lys6 and N-formyl-Met1-Leu2-Phe3-Phe4-Gly5-Gly6-Lys7; 2) fluorescent pentapeptide ligands (N-formyl-Met-X-Phe-Phe-Lys(FITC) where X = Leu, Ala, Val or Gly); and 3) small crosslinking ligands where the photoaffinity crosslinker 4-azidosalicylic acid (ASA) was conjugated to Lys in positions 3 and 4 and p-benzoyl-phenylalanine (Bpa) was located in position 2 in N-formyl-Met1-Bpa2-Phe3-Tyr4. The peptides were characterized according to activity and affinity in human neutrophils and cell lines transfected with FPR. All of the peptides were agonists, with parallel affinity and activity. In the first group, the peptide activity decreases as Lys is placed closer to the N-formyl group and the activity is improved by 1-3 orders of magnitude by conjugation with FITC. In the second group, the dissociation rate of the peptide from the receptor increases as position 2 is replaced by aliphatic amino acids with smaller alkyl groups. In the third group, crosslinking ligands remain biologically active, display nM affinity and covalently label the FPR.

Mutational analysis of the endothelin type A receptor (ETA): interactions and model of selective ETA antagonist BMS-182874 with putative ETA receptor binding cavity

Endothelin (ET) receptor antagonism is a potential therapeutic intervention in the treatment of vascular diseases. To elucidate the mechanism of antagonist-ET receptor complex formation, the interactions of four chemically distinct antagonists were investigated using a combination of genetic and biochemical approaches. By site-specific mutagenesis we previously demonstrated that Tyr129 in the second transmembrane domain was critical for high-affinity, subtype-selective binding to the A subtype of ET (ETA) receptors [Krystek et al. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 12383-12386]. Affinities of the constrained cyclic pentapeptide BQ-123, the pyrimidinylbenzenesulfonamide bosentan, the indancarboxlic acid SB 209670, and the naphthalenesulfonamide BMS-182874 were decreased 20-1000-fold in Tyr129Ala, Tyr129Ser, and Tyr129His ETA receptor mutants. Substitution of Tyr129 with Phe or Trp did not alter the high-affinity binding of BQ-123, bosentan, or SB 209670. BMS-182874 binding affinity was decreased 10-fold in Tyr129Phe and Tyr129trp ET receptors. These data indicate a role of aromatic interactions in the binding of these antagonists to ETA receptors an, in the case of BMS-182874, also suggested a hydrogen bond with the tyrosine hydroxyl. This hypothesis was supported by structure-activity data with analogs of BMS-182874 that varied the C-5 dimethylamino substituent on the naphthalene ring. Mutation of Asp126 and Asp133 also altered binding of BMS-182874 and C-5 analogs. In all cases, naphthalenesulfonamide binding was more severely affected by mutation of Asp133 than by mutation of Asp126. Phosphoinositide hydrolysis and extracellular acidification rate studies demonstrated the importance of Tyr129 to ETA-mediated signal transduction. On the basis of these data, two plausible models of the docked conformation of BMS-182874 in the ETA receptor are proposed as a starting point for further delineation of interactions that underlie antagonist-ETA receptor complex formation.

Isolation of the endothelin B receptor from bovine lung. Structure, signal sequence, and binding site

Bovine lung endothelin-B receptor has been isolated in good yield with a new procedure involving the use of endothelin-1 coupled to iminobiotin with a long spacer and avidin-agarose affinity chromatography. Contrary to previous reports, evidence has been obtained that the native form of this receptor corresponds to the full-length transcript expected on the basis of cDNA clones. The binding of endothelin to a variety of shortened fragments of the full receptor suggests that the long N-terminal sequence of this receptor has very little influence on the binding of endothelin and that the main determinants of the endothelin binding site might be constituted by residues in the sixth, and possibly the seventh, transmembrane helices.

Endothelin receptor antagonism

Following the original report by Yanagisawa et al. (1988) more than 7 years ago, compelling evidence that ET plays an important role in the local regulation of smooth muscle tone and cell growth has been reported. In addition, many studies point to a significant role for endothelin in nonvascular function. The investigation of the endothelin system has been greatly advanced in the last 2 to 3 years through significant advances in the development of potent and selective ET receptor antagonists. These agents have proven to be essential tools for elucidating the biological significance of the ET system, leading to the realization that antagonism of the ET system may have significant therapeutic potential. As emphasized in this review, the importance of chronic blockade of the ET system may be a critical aspect of future research in this exciting area. Confounding issues remain the lack of information about the role of the ETB receptor, the apparent pharmacological evidence for additional ET receptor subtypes, and species variation in the tissue distribution of ET isoforms and receptor subtypes. Along with the greater ability to understand the endothelin system provided by potent and selective pharmacological agents, is the important contribution of modern molecular biology techniques, highlighted by the insights gained from recent reports of results from ET gene disruption studies. Kurihara et al. (1994) found that ET-1-deficient homozygous mice die at birth of apparent respiratory failure secondary to severe craniofacial abnormalities. Subsequently, Yanagisawa's laboratory has presented and published a series of complementary gene disruption studies. First, Hosoda et al. (1994) demonstrated remarkably, that ETA receptor knockout mice bear morphological abnormalities nearly identical to ET-1 knockout mice. Second, they found that disruption of the ET-3 peptide and ETB receptor genes result in homozygous mice that share identical phenotypic traits (i.e., coloration changes and aganglionic megacolon) which are similar to a previously known natural mutation, the Piebald-Lethal mouse (Hosoda et al., 1994; Baynash et al., 1994). This phenotype has a human corollary known as Hirschsprung's Disease and it is now known that the disease, though multigenic, results from a missense mutation of the ETB receptor gene in some individuals (Puffenberger et al., 1994). Taken together these data indicate that the endothelin system is essential to correct embryonic neural crest development, a completely novel finding within the superfamily of guanine-protein-linked receptors.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Lysine 182 of endothelin B receptor modulates agonist selectivity and antagonist affinity: evidence for the overlap of peptide and non-peptide ligand binding sites

The potent vasoactive peptide hormone endothelin (ET) binds to receptors which belong to the G-protein coupled receptor family. The availability of non-peptide antagonists for ET receptors allows investigation of the relationship among the binding sites for peptide and non-peptide ligands. In this study, a lysine residue, conserved within transmembrane domain 3 (TM3) of the ETA and ETB receptor subtypes, is implicated in agonist and antagonist binding by its analogous position within TM3 to a binding site aspartate residue conserved within bioactive amine receptors. Replacement of this lysine within hETB by arginine, alanine, methionine, aspartate, or glutamate results in hETB variants with unaltered affinities for agonist peptide ET-1 but which have affinities for peptide agonists ET-2, ET-3, sarafotoxin 6C, and TRL 1736 which are between 1-3 orders of magnitude lower than their corresponding wild-type hETB values. Significantly, the affinities of non-peptide antagonists, (+/-)-SB 209670 and its analogs as well as Ro 46-2005, are abrogated. The results suggest that an interaction of K182 of hETB with the indan 2-carboxyl of (+/-)-SB 209670 may contribute to the high-affinity binding of the diarylindan antagonists. The results indicate that TM3 of hETB is a region of overlap among the binding sites of non-peptide antagonists and the affected peptide agonists.

Identification of a region of the human endothelin ETA receptor required for interaction with bosentan

Bosentan (Ro 47-0203, 4-tert-butyl-N-[6-(2-hydroxy-ethoxy)-5-(2- methoxy-phenoxy)-2,2'-bipyrimidin-4-yl]-benzenesulfonamide) is a new non-peptidic mixed antagonist of endothelin receptors whose binding activity was two orders higher for the endothelin ETA receptor than that for the endothelin ETB receptor. To identify which region of the human endothelin ETA receptor interacts with bosentan, we created various chimeric endothelin receptors containing domains from the endothelin ETA and ETB receptors in Chinese hamster ovary cells and studied the effect of bosentan on the binding of endothelin-1 to the chimeric receptors. We found that the chimeric endothelin ETB receptor containing domains from the endothelin ETA receptor, the second extracellular region including the proximal transmembrane region (B-region) revealed an affinity toward bosentan which was similar to that of the endothelin ETA receptor. In contrast, the chimeric endothelin ETA receptor, containing the B-region of the endothelin ETB receptor, reduced the binding affinity to the level of the endothelin ETB receptor. Since bosentan competes with endothelin-1 for binding to the endothelin ETA receptor, this receptor antagonist seems to interact with the (140-144) KLLAG sequence located at the carboxylterminus of the second transmembrane region of the endothelin ETA receptor, required for the natural ligand binding.

Identification of specific regions of the human endothelin-B receptor required for high affinity binding with endothelin-3

To investigate the endothelin-3 (ET-3) binding region of the endothelin-B (ETB) receptor, we have transiently produced various chimeric endothelin receptors in transfected Chinese hamster ovary cells. Using 125I-ET-1 as the radioactive ligand in the displacement experiment, the replacement of both the second and third extracellular regions including the flanking transmembranes of the ETB receptor with the corresponding domains of the endothelin-A (ETA) receptor, increased the apparent Ki value for ET-3 from 5 x 10(-11) M to 10(-8) M. The affinity of this chimeric receptor, ETB-BC, for ET-3 was about two orders lower than ETB yet one order higher than ETA. Previously we have reported the involvement of Lys-140 located in the C-terminus of the second transmembrane region of the ETA receptor for ET-1 binding (Eur. J. Biochem., 220, 37-43, 1994). To assess the importance of the corresponding Lys-161 of the ETB receptor in ET-3 binding, we have replaced it with Ile in the ETB receptor. The mutant receptor had a 5.6-fold reduction in its affinity for ET-3, but its affinity for ET-1 remained similar. These results demonstrate that Lys-161 of the receptor is important for high affinity binding with ET-3 which, in part, confers the non-selective binding characteristics of the ETB receptor for ET isopeptides.

Locating ligand-binding sites in 7TM receptors by protein engineering

Over the past year, mutational analysis of peptide receptors has started to change our understanding of the interaction between G protein coupled receptors and their ligands, an area previously almost totally dominated by results from studies of monoamine receptors. A picture is currently emerging, in which small ligands appear to bind in three (more or less) overlapping ligand-binding pockets in between the transmembrane segments. In contrast, contact residues for peptide and protein ligands have mainly been found in exterior regions of peptide and protein receptors. It is also becoming increasingly clear that agonists and antagonists may interact in vastly different manners, even though they are competitive ligands for a common receptor.

The structure and specificity of endothelin receptors: their importance in physiology and medicine

In addition to involvement in vascular endothelium-smooth muscle communication, the secretion of and receptors for, endothelins are widely distributed. Two cloned receptor subtypes are G-protein-coupled to several intracellular messengers, predominantly inositol phosphates. From a knowledge of structure-activity relationships and peptide conformations, details of receptor architecture and selective agents, including nonpeptides and antagonists, have been discovered. From the nature of the actions of endothelins, receptor distributions (including CNS) and plasma levels, it is concluded that they are paracrine factors normally involved in long-term cellular regulation, but which may be important in several pathologies, many of which are stress-related.