Recombinant attenuated Vibrio cholerae strains used as live oral vaccines

Parenteral Vaccination with a Cholera Conjugate Vaccine Boosts Vibriocidal and Anti-OSP Responses in Mice Previously Immunized with an Oral Cholera Vaccine

Oral cholera vaccination protects against cholera; however, responses in young children are low and of short duration. The best current correlates of protection against cholera target Vibrio cholerae O-specific polysaccharide (anti-OSP), including vibriocidal responses. A cholera conjugate vaccine has been developed that induces anti-OSP immune responses, including memory B-cell responses. To address whether cholera conjugate vaccine would boost immune responses following oral cholera vaccination, we immunized mice with oral cholera vaccine Inaba CVD 103-HgR or buffer only (placebo) on day 0, followed by parenteral boosting immunizations on days 14, 42, and 70 with cholera conjugate vaccine Inaba OSP: recombinant tetanus toxoid heavy chain fragment or phosphate buffered saline (PBS)/placebo. Compared with responses in mice immunized with oral vaccine alone or intramuscular cholera conjugate vaccine alone, mice receiving combination vaccination developed significantly higher vibriocidal, IgM OSP-specific serum responses and OSP-specific IgM memory B-cell responses. A combined vaccination approach, which includes oral cholera vaccination followed by parenteral cholera conjugate vaccine boosting, results in increased immune responses that have been associated with protection against cholera. These results suggest that such an approach should be evaluated in humans.

Oral administration of recombinant Mycobacterium smegmatis expressing a tripeptide construct derived from endogenous and microbial antigens prevents atherosclerosis in ApoE(-/-) mice

INTRODUCTION

Immunotherapy by inducing oral tolerance to atherogenic self-antigens is gaining importance as an alternative treatment modality for atherosclerosis. The use of live bacterial vectors to express the recombinant antigen in vivo will obviate the need for large-scale purification of recombinant protein and may also augment the efficacy of oral tolerance induction.

AIM

The objective of the study was to explore the use of recombinant Mycobacterium smegmatis as a live vector for oral delivery of antigens to induce immune tolerance.

METHOD AND RESULTS

We developed a M. smegmatis vector to secrete a recombinant tripeptide construct (AHC; peptides from Apolipoprotein B, Heat-shock protein 60 and Chlamydia pneumoniae outer membrane protein) expressed in a dendroaspin protein scaffold in pJH154 background. Immune response and oral tolerance to the cloned peptides were studied in C57/BL6 mice. The efficacy of this live vaccine to control atherosclerosis was studied in ApoE(-/-) knockout mice in C57/BL6 background. Oral administration of M. smegmatis secreting the cloned AHC antigen was found to induce tolerance to cloned protein and reduce the development of atherosclerosis by 24.0% compared to control. Protection against atherosclerosis was associated with increase in expression of regulatory T cell-associated markers including CTLA4 (1.8-fold), Foxp3 (2.6-fold), TGF-β (2.8-fold), IL10 (2.9-fold), and reduction in lipids, macrophage infiltration, and expression of inflammatory mediators in aorta.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that M. smegmatis can be developed as an oral carrier of recombinant proteins to treat inflammatory autoimmune diseases.

Single-dose Live Oral Cholera Vaccine CVD 103-HgR Protects Against Human Experimental Infection With Vibrio cholerae O1 El Tor

BACKGROUND

No licensed cholera vaccine is presently available in the United States. Cholera vaccines available in other countries require 2 spaced doses. A single-dose cholera vaccine that can rapidly protect short-notice travelers to high-risk areas and help control explosive outbreaks where logistics render 2-dose immunization regimens impractical would be a major advance.PXVX0200, based on live attenuated Vibrio cholerae O1 classical Inaba vaccine strain CVD 103-HgR, elicits seroconversion of vibriocidal antibodies (a correlate of protection) within 10 days of a single oral dose. We investigated the protection conferred by this vaccine in a human cholera challenge model.

METHODS

Consenting healthy adult volunteers, 18-45 years old, were randomly allocated 1:1 to receive 1 oral dose of vaccine (approximately 5 × 10(8) colony-forming units [CFU]) or placebo in double-blind fashion. Volunteers ingested approximately 1 × 10(5) CFU of wild-type V. cholerae O1 El Tor Inaba strain N16961 10 days or 3 months after vaccination and were observed on an inpatient research ward for stool output measurement and management of hydration.

RESULTS

The vaccine was well tolerated, with no difference in adverse event frequency among 95 vaccinees vs 102 placebo recipients. The primary endpoint, moderate (≥3.0 L) to severe (≥5.0 L) diarrheal purge, occurred in 39 of 66 (59.1%) placebo controls but only 2 of 35 (5.7%) vaccinees at 10 days (vaccine efficacy, 90.3%; P < .0001) and 4 of 33 (12.1%) vaccinees at 3 months (vaccine efficacy, 79.5%; P < .0001).

CONCLUSIONS

The significant vaccine efficacy documented 10 days and 3 months after 1 oral dose of PXVX0200 supports further development as a single-dose cholera vaccine.

CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION

NCT01895855.

Live bacterial vaccine vectors: an overview

Genetically attenuated microorganisms, pathogens, and some commensal bacteria can be engineered to deliver recombinant heterologous antigens to stimulate the host immune system, while still offering good levels of safety. A key feature of these live vectors is their capacity to stimulate mucosal as well as humoral and/or cellular systemic immunity. This enables the use of different forms of vaccination to prevent pathogen colonization of mucosal tissues, the front door for many infectious agents. Furthermore, delivery of DNA vaccines and immune system stimulatory molecules, such as cytokines, can be achieved using these special carriers, whose adjuvant properties and, sometimes, invasive capacities enhance the immune response. More recently, the unique features and versatility of these vectors have also been exploited to develop anti-cancer vaccines, where tumor-associated antigens, cytokines, and DNA or RNA molecules are delivered. Different strategies and genetic tools are constantly being developed, increasing the antigenic potential of agents delivered by these systems, opening fresh perspectives for the deployment of vehicles for new purposes. Here we summarize the main characteristics of the different types of live bacterial vectors and discuss new applications of these delivery systems in the field of vaccinology.

When, how, and where can oral cholera vaccines be used to interrupt cholera outbreaks?

Cholera continues to be a major global health problem, at times causing major and prolonged outbreaks in both endemic and nonendemic settings in developing countries. While improved water quality, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) will provide the ultimate solution to prevention of this disease burden, this is a far-off goal for most developing countries. Oral cholera vaccines cholera vaccines (OCVs) have been demonstrated to be effective in the control of cholera outbreaks, and constitute useful tools to be used in conjunction with efforts to improve WASH. Two killed OCVs are prequalified by WHO for purchase by UN agencies for international use. Recently, WHO has launched a global stockpile stockpile of killed OCVs for use to control outbreaks. Rational deployment of OCV from this stockpile will require consideration of costs, feasibility, disease epidemiology epidemiology , and the protective characteristics of the vaccine deployed, as well as effective and rapid coordination of processes and logistics logistics used to make decisions on deployment and delivery of the vaccine to the population in need. Despite not having data on all the questions of relevance as to how to use OCVs to control cholera outbreaks in different settings, there is clearly more than enough evidence to initiate their use, as answers to remaining questions and refinement of policies will mainly come with experience.

Safety and immunogenicity of single-dose live oral cholera vaccine strain CVD 103-HgR, prepared from new master and working cell banks

Currently, no cholera vaccine is available for persons traveling from the United States to areas of high cholera transmission and who for reasons of occupation or host factors are at increased risk for development of the disease. A single-dose oral cholera vaccine with a rapid onset of protection would be particularly useful for such travelers and might also be an adjunct control measure for cholera outbreaks. The attenuated Vibrio cholerae O1 vaccine strain CVD 103-HgR harbors a 94% deletion of the cholera toxin A subunit gene (ctxA) and has a mercury resistance gene inserted in the gene encoding hemolysin A. We undertook a phase I randomized placebo-controlled two-site trial to assess the safety and immunogenicity of a preliminary formulation of CVD 103-HgR prepared from new master and working cell banks. Healthy young adults were randomized (5:1 vaccinees to placebo recipients) to receive a single oral dose of ∼4.4 × 10(8) CFU of vaccine or a placebo. Blood serum vibriocidal and cholera toxin-specific IgG antibodies were measured before and 10, 14, and 28 days following vaccination or placebo. Excretion of the vaccine strain in the stool was assessed during the first week postvaccination. A total of 66 subjects were enrolled, comprising 55 vaccinees and 11 placebo recipients. The vaccine was well tolerated. The overall vibriocidal and anti-cholera toxin seroconversion rates were 89% and 57%, respectively. CVD 103-HgR is undergoing renewed manufacture for licensure in the United States under the auspices of PaxVax. Our data mimic those from previous commercial formulations that elicited vibriocidal antibody seroconversion (a correlate of protection) in ∼90% of vaccinees. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under registration no. NCT01585181.).

New-generation vaccines against cholera

Cholera is a major global health problem, causing approximately 100,000 deaths annually, about half of which occur in sub-Saharan Africa. Although early-generation parenteral cholera vaccines were abandoned as public health tools owing to their limited efficacy, newer-generation oral cholera vaccines have attractive safety and protection profiles. Both killed and live oral vaccines have been licensed, although only killed oral vaccines are currently manufactured and available. These killed oral vaccines not only provide direct protection to vaccinated individuals, but also confer herd immunity. The combination of direct vaccine protection and vaccine herd immunity effects makes these vaccines highly cost-effective and, therefore, attractive for use in developing countries. Administration of these oral vaccines does not require qualified medical personnel, which makes their use practical--even in developing countries. Although new-generation oral cholera vaccines should not be considered in isolation from other preventive approaches, especially improved water quality and sanitation, they represent important tools in the public health armamentarium to control both endemic and epidemic cholera.

Live attenuated oral cholera vaccines

Live, orally administered, attenuated vaccine strains of Vibrio cholerae have many theoretical advantages over killed vaccines. A single oral inoculation could result in intestinal colonization and rapid immune responses, obviating the need for repetitive dosing. Live V. cholerae organisms can also respond to the intestinal environment and immunological exposure to in vivo expressed bacterial products, which could result in improved immunological protection against wild-type V. cholerae infection. The concern remains that live oral cholera vaccines may be less effective among partially immune individuals in cholera endemic areas as pre-existing antibodies can inhibit live organisms and decrease colonization of the gut. A number of live oral cholera vaccines have been developed to protect against cholera caused by the classical and El Tor serotypes of V. cholerae O1, including CVD 103-HgR, Peru-15 and V. cholerae 638. A number of live oral cholera vaccines have also been similarly developed to protect against cholera caused by V. cholerae O139, including CVD 112 and Bengal-15. Live, orally administered, attenuated cholera vaccines are in various stages of development and evaluation.

Virulence factors, pathogenesis and vaccine protection in cholera and ETEC diarrhea

Recent work has provided new insights into the pathogenesis of the potentially life-threatening diarrheas caused by Vibrio cholerae and enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC): a new mechanism (post-translational degradation), which is involved in the control of cholera toxin expression, has been discovered. Recent evidence also suggests that vibrios upregulate cholera toxin expression in response to intestinal fluid components, and enterotoxin-carrying bacterial outer membrane vesicles might have a function in ETEC pathogenesis. An important role of the environment is supported by the correlation between cholera incidence and elevated sea surface temperature, which supports the notion that the zooplankton is a V. cholerae reservoir. Additionally, environmental lytic cholera phages could influence cholera seasonality by 'terminating' the seasonal epidemic. Finally, the strong herd immunity elicited by an oral cholera vaccine indicates that cholera vaccination could have a significant public health impact.

Attenuated live cholera vaccine strain CVD 103-HgR elicits significantly higher serum vibriocidal antibody titers in persons of blood group O

Persons of blood group O are at increased risk of developing cholera gravis. In a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind safety-immunogenicity trial of live oral cholera vaccine CVD 103-HgR in 5- to 9-year-old Chilean children, vibriocidal antibody seroconversion (74% overall) did not differ by blood group. However, the reciprocal geometric mean titer (GMT) in blood group O vaccines (GMT = 486) was higher than that in non-O vaccines (GMT = 179) (P < 0.02).

Comparative efficacy of biodegradable liposomes and microspheres as carriers for delivery of Vibrio cholerae antigens in the intestine

The effect of the encapsulated antigens of Vibrio cholerae and their route of administration in induction of immune response was studied in experimental cholera. The antigenic proteins of V. cholerae El Tor strain KB207 were obtained by fractionation of cell-free lysate by high-performance liquid chromatography. The antigenic proteins were pooled and encapsulated in biodegradable liposomes and poly(D,L) lactic co-glycolic acid microspheres. Rabbits were immunized with free as well as encapsulated antigens by different routes. Liposome-encapsulated antigens delivered intraintestinally offered maximum protection. Orally or intraintestinally delivered antigens in microspheres failed to elicit a significant immune response, although as a carrier microspheres were comparable to liposomes when judged by the subcutaneous route. The results suggested that liposomes and microspheres could be used as carriers of protective antigens of V. cholerae for effective immunization.

Production of Vibrio cholerae ghosts (VCG) by expression of a cloned phage lysis gene: potential for vaccine development

The protein E-specific lysis mechanism of the Escherichia coli-specific bacteriophage PhiX174 was employed to produce Vibrio cholerae ghosts (VCG). VCG consist of both rounded and collapsed cells that have lost their cytoplasmic contents through an E-specific hole in the cell envelope. These ghosts are proposed as non-living material for immunization against cholera. A specific membrane anchor sequence was used to insert the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) reverse transcriptase (RT) fusion protein into the cell envelope of V. cholerae. The identity of the expression products was confirmed by Western blot analysis employing an RT-specific monoclonal antibody. HIV-1 RT was chosen as a model for the purpose of evaluating heterologous gene expression in V. cholerae and the carrier potential of VCG. Intraperitoneal immunization of mice was used to evaluate the immunogenic potential of VCG. Preliminary results showed significant seroconversions to intact whole-cell vibrio antigens in mice immunized with VCG or a heat-killed whole-cell vibrio preparation.

Kinetics of the vibriocidal antibody response to live oral cholera vaccines

The best correlate of protection against cholera is the level of serum vibriocidal antibodies, which are primarily directed against the O antigen of Vibrio cholerae O1 and lyse V. cholerae in the presence of complement. We established the timing of peak vibriocidal antibody response using sera from safety/immunogenicity studies of live oral cholera vaccines CVD 103-HgR, CVD 103-HgR2 and CVD 110 among immunologically naive North Americans and Colombians. The serum reciprocal vibriocidal antibody titre was consistently higher 10 days postimmunization than on either day 7 or day 14. This study suggests that recent phase 2 studies of CVD 103-HgR may have underestimated the peak vibriocidal titre by collecting serum on days 7-8 rather than on day 10; future studies of live oral cholera vaccines should take these results into account to obtain the best measurement of peak immunological responses. Because of the rapid drop in vibriocidal antibody titres about 2 weeks after immunization, care must be exercised in comparing immunogenicity of different vaccine candidates, formulations, dosage levels and immunization schedules.

Safety, immunogenicity, and excretion pattern of single-dose live oral cholera vaccine CVD 103-HgR in Peruvian adults of high and low socioeconomic levels

Groups of 122 Peruvian adults of low socioeconomic level (SEL) and 125 of high SEL received a randomly allocated 5 x 10(9)- or 5 x 10(8)-CFU dose of CVD 103-HgR live oral cholera vaccine or a placebo. The vaccine was well tolerated. Vibriocidal seroconversions occurred in 78% of high-SEL and 72% of low-SEL subjects who ingested the high dose and in 78 and 49%, respectively, of those who received the low dose.

Vaccines to prevent enteric infections

Considerable progress has been made in the last decade in developing vaccines against the enteric infections of greatest public health importance. A quadrivalent rotavirus vaccine consisting of rhesus rotavirus vaccine (which contains serotype 3 neutralization antigen) and three reassortant viruses (rhesus virus expressing neutralization antigens of serotypes 1, 2 or 4) is undergoing placebo-controlled field trials of efficacy in the USA and in two developing countries. Two new vaccines against typhoid fever (oral Ty21a and parenteral Vi polysaccharide) have been licensed in many countries. Even newer generations of typhoid vaccines are undergoing clinical testing, including new attenuated S. typhi strains and Vi polysaccharide-carrier protein conjugate vaccines. Two inactivated oral cholera vaccines, consisting of inactivated V. cholerae O1 bacteria alone or in combination with purified B subunit of cholera toxin, each conferred 50-53% protection over 3 years in a field trial in Bangladesh where subjects were immunized with a three-dose regimen. In extensive clinical trials in adults and children in less-developed countries, an engineered live oral cholera vaccine, strain CVD 103-HgR, has been shown to be well tolerated and highly immunogenic following administration of just a single oral dose; a large-scale field trial in 70,000 subjects is underway to investigate the efficacy of this vaccine. Several candidate vaccines against Shigella and enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli are in clinical trials. Accumulating knowledge on pathogenesis of enteric infections and advances in mucosal and cellular immunology, coupled with the application of modern biotechnology, have resulted in a plethora of vaccine candidates. It is expected that in future years efforts will be directed to construct vaccines against other enteric pathogens.

Live oral vaccines against cholera: an update

One hundred years elapsed between the first (live, parenteral) cholera vaccine that entered clinical trials in 1885 and the field trials of two oral inactivated cholera vaccines undertaken in Bangladesh in the mid-1980s. The oral inactivated vaccines advanced the art by establishing, convincingly, that oral vaccines could protect (although multiple doses were required) and that (at least in adults) protection could last 3 years. Attenuated Vibrio cholerae O1 strain CVD 103-HgR (deleted of the cholera toxin A subunit gene and harbouring a gene encoding resistance to Hg++) constitutes another significant advance. This live oral vaccine is well tolerated and highly immunogenic in adults and children and highly protective (in adult volunteer challenge studies) following ingestion of of a single dose.

Safety and immunogenicity in North Americans of a single dose of live oral cholera vaccine CVD 103-HgR: results of a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind crossover trial

We conducted a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized crossover study to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of a single 5 x 10(8)-CFU dose of live oral recombinant cholera vaccine CVD 103-HgR in 94 North American adults. The vaccine was well tolerated without associated adverse reactions. Despite minimal fecal excretion of vaccine, 97% of subjects exhibited serum vibriocidal antibody and 72% had antitoxin responses.

Safety and immunogenicity of single-dose live oral cholera vaccine CVD 103-HgR in 5-9-year-old Indonesian children

Oral vaccines offer great promise as public-health measures to prevent disease in less-developed countries. CVD 103-HgR, a genetically engineered, attenuated, Vibrio cholerae O1 strain has proved effective in industrialised countries. We have assessed the safety, immunogenicity, and excretion of this live cholera vaccine in children in north Jakarta, Indonesia. 412 children aged 5-9 years received single doses of 5 x 10(6), 5 x 10(7), 5 x 10(8), 5 x 10(9), or 1 x 10(10) colony forming units (CFU) of CVD 103-HgR or placebo (5 x 10(8) inactivated Escherichia coli K-12) with buffer. All doses were well tolerated. The 5 x 10(8) CFU dose, which is highly immunogenic in subjects in industrialised countries (greater than 90% seroconversion), elicited seroconversions of vibriocidal antibody in only 16% of Indonesian children. By contrast, a single 5 x 10(9) CFU dose of vaccine resulted in high rates (75% and 87%) of seroconversion with two different batches of vaccine. A batch prepared with a centrifugation step gave significantly higher geometric mean titres (16-fold increase over baseline) than did a batch in which there was a filtration step between fermentation and lyophilisation (10-fold increase over baseline). At a 5 x 10(9) CFU dose, CVD 103-HgR is well tolerated and highly immunogenic in Indonesian children and should therefore be further investigated for use as a one-dose live oral cholera vaccine in developing countries.

Safety and immunogenicity of a booster dose of Vibrio cholerae CVD 103-HgR live oral cholera vaccine in Swiss adults

Adult volunteers received a booster dose (4 x 10(8) CFU) of attenuated Vibrio cholerae CVD 103-HgR oral vaccine 15 or 24 months after primary immunization. The immune response was modest, presumably due to rapid clearance of the vaccine strain by a primed immune system.

Experimental evaluation of antitoxic protective effect of new cholera vaccines in mice

Intraperitoneal immunization of mice and subsequent challenge with purified cholera toxin (CT) were employed to evaluate the anti-cholera toxin protective effect of two new oral cholera vaccines, live CVD 103-HgR and killed B subunit-whole cell (BS-WC). CVD 103-HgR vaccine demonstrated 100% protection of mice against 2.25 LD50 and 70% against 3 LD50 of CT. Mice immunized with BS-WC vaccine were protected against 2.25 and 3 LD50 of CT in 88 and 62% of cases, respectively. All three killed parenteral vaccines failed to protect against CT. We suggest this mouse system for preliminary evaluation of the antitoxic protective activity of cholera vaccines.