Bacterial protein kinases that recognize tertiary rather than primary structure?

Kinetic studies of HPr, HPr(H15D), HPr(H15E), and HPr(His approximately P) phosphorylation by the Streptococcus salivarius HPr(Ser) kinase/phosphorylase

HPr is a central protein of the phosphoenolpyruvate:sugar phosphotransferase transport system (PTS). In streptococci, HPr can be phosphorylated at His(15) at the expense of PEP by enzyme I (EI) of the PTS, producing HPr(His approximately P). HPr can also be phosphorylated at Ser(46) by the ATP-dependent HPr(Ser) kinase/phosphorylase (HprK/P), producing HPr(Ser-P). Lastly, HPr can be phosphorylated on both residues, producing HPr(Ser-P)(His approximately P) (HPr-P2). We report here a study on the phosphorylation of Streptococcus salivarius HPr, HPr(H15D), HPr(H15E), and HPr(His approximately P) by HprK/P to assess the involvement of HprK/P in the synthesis of HPr-P2 in streptococcal cells. We first developed a spectrophotometric method for measuring HprK/P kinase activity. Using this assay, we found that the K(m) of HprK/P for HPr at pH 7.4 and 37 degrees C was approximately 110 muM, with a specificity constant (k(cat)/K(m)) of 1.7 x 10(4) M(-1) s(-1). The specificity constants for HPr(H15D) and HPr(H15E) were approximately 13 times lower. Kinetic studies conducted under conditions where HPr(His approximately P) was stable (i.e., pH 8.6 and 15 degrees C) showed that HPr(His approximately P) was a poorer substrate for HprK/P than HPr(H15D), the k(cat)/K(m) for HPr(H15D) and HPr(His approximately P) being approximately 9 and 26 times lower than that for HPr, respectively. Our results suggested that (i) the inefficiency of the phosphorylation of HPr(His approximately P) by HprK/P results from the presence of a negative charge at position 15 as well as from other structural elements and (ii) the contribution of streptococcal HprK/P to the synthesis of HPr-P2 in vivo is marginal.

Bioinformatic analyses of bacterial HPr kinase/phosphorylase homologues

HPr kinase/phosphorylases (HprKs) regulate catabolite repression and sugar transport in Gram-positive bacteria by phosphorylating the small phosphotransferase system (PTS) protein HPr on a serine residue. We identified homologues of HprK in currently sequenced genomes and multiply aligned their sequences in order to perform phylogenetic and motif analyses. Seventy-eight homologues from bacteria and one from an archaeon comprise nine phylogenetic clusters. Some homologues come from bacteria whose genomes contain multiple highly divergent paralogues that cluster loosely together. Many of these proteins are truncated or show little or no identifiable similarity outside of the Walker A nucleotide binding domain. HprK homologues were identified in Gram-negative bacteria that appear to lack PTS permeases, suggesting modes of action and substrates that differ from those characterized in Gram-positive bacteria.

Glycosylated and phosphorylated proteins--expression in yeast and oocytes of Xenopus: prospects and challenges--relevance to expression of thermostable proteins

Phosphorylation and glycosylation are important posttranslational events in the biosynthesis of proteins. The different degrees of phosphorylation and glycosylation of proteins have been an intriguing phenomenon. Advances in genetic engineering have made it possible to control the degree of glycosylation and phosphorylation of proteins. Structural biology of phosphorylated and glycosylated proteins has been advancing at a much slower pace due to difficulties in using high-resolution NMR studies in solution phase. Major difficulties have arisen from the inherent mobilities of phosphorylated and glycosylated side chains. This paper reviews molecular and structural biology of phosphorylated and glycosylated proteins expressed in eukaryotic expression systems which are especially suited for large-scale production of these proteins. In our laboratory, we have observed that eukaryotic expression systems are particularly suited for the expression of thermostable light-activated proteins, e.g., bacteriorhodopsins and plastocyanins.

A novel protein kinase that controls carbon catabolite repression in bacteria

HPr(Ser) kinase is the sensor in a multicomponent phosphorelay system that controls catabolite repression, sugar transport and carbon metabolism in gram-positive bacteria. Unlike most other protein kinases, it recognizes the tertiary structure in its target protein, HPr, a phosphocarrier protein of the bacterial phosphotransferase system and a transcriptional cofactor controlling the phenomenon of catabolite repression. We have identified the gene (ptsK) encoding this serine/threonine protein kinase and characterized the purified protein product. Orthologues of PtsK have been identified only in bacteria. These proteins constitute a novel family unrelated to other previously characterized protein phosphorylating enzymes. The Bacillus subtilis kinase is shown to be allosterically activated by metabolites such as fructose 1,6-bisphosphate and inhibited by inorganic phosphate. In contrast to wild-type B. subtilis, the ptsK mutant is insensitive to transcriptional regulation by catabolite repression. The reported results advance our understanding of phosphorylation-dependent carbon control mechanisms in Gram-positive bacteria.

Substrates containing phosphorylated residues adjacent to proline decrease the cleavage by proline-specific peptidases

Thirteen dipeptide rho-nitroanilides of the common structure H-Xaa-Pro-4-NA (Xaa = serine, threonine and tyrosine) and seven tripeptide rho-nitroanilides of the common structure H-Gly-Xaa-Pro-4-NA (Xaa = serine or threonine) were prepared and analyzed as substrates of the proline-specific peptidases dipeptidyl peptidase IV and prolyl endopeptidase, respectively. The side chains of the hydroxy amino acids were synthetically modified by various acyl-, benzyl- and phosphate residues. The presence of aliphatic or aromatic residues attached to the side chain of the P2-hydroxy amino acids resulted in no significant change of the specificity constants of the enzyme-catalyzed substrate hydrolysis. In some cases, however, substrate inhibition was observed. In contrast, the reactivity of dipeptidyl peptidase IV and prolyl endopeptidase decreases more than two orders of magnitude towards the phosphorylated di- and tripeptide substrates compared to the hydrolysis of unmodified substrates. The kinetic data obtained with the model compounds suggest that side-chain modification of proline-containing peptide substrates may influence their resistance towards the hydrolytic activity of proline-specific hydrolases. Additionally, the results support that structural changes of the substrate during enzyme-hydrolysis may be involved in the mechanism of action of proline-specific serine peptidases. From this result we speculate that posttranslational phosphorylation of peptide sequences found in protein kinase recognition motifs such as -Xaa-Ser/Thr-Pro-Yaa- and -Xaa-Pro-Ser/Thr-Yaa- may serve as structural determinants that modulate their proteolytic stability.

Catabolite repression and inducer control in Gram-positive bacteria

Results currently available clearly indicate that the metabolite-activated protein kinase-mediated phosphorylation of Ser-46 in HPr plays a key role in catabolite repression and the control of inducer levels in low-GC Gram-positive bacteria. This protein kinase is not found in enteric bacteria such as E. coli and Salmonella typhimurium where an entirely different PTS-mediated regulatory mechanism is responsible for catabolite repression and inducer concentration control. In Table 2 these two mechanistically dissimilar but functionally related processes are compared (Saier et al., 1995b). In Gram-negative enteric bacteria, an external sugar is sensed by the sugar-recognition constituent of an Enzyme II complex of the PTS (IIC), and a dephosphorylating signal is transmitted via the Enzyme IIB/HPr proteins to the central regulatory protein, IIAGlc. Targets regulated include (1) permeases specific for lactose, maltose, melibiose and raffinose, (2) catabolic enzymes such as glycerol kinase that generate cytoplasmic inducers, and (3) the cAMP biosynthetic enzyme, adenylate cyclase that mediates catabolite repression (Saier, 1989, 1993). In low-GC Gram-positive bacteria, cytoplasmic phosphorylated sugar metabolites are sensed by the HPr kinase which is allostericlaly activated. HPr becomes phosphorylated on Ser-46, and this phosphorylated derivative regulates the activities of its target proteins. These targets include (1) the PTS, (2) non-PTS permeases (both of which are inhibited) and (3) a cytoplasmic sugar-P phosphatase which is activated to reduce cytoplasmic inducer levels. Other important targets of HPr(ser-P) action are (4) the CcpA protein and probably (5) the CepB transcription factor. These two proteins together are believed to determine the intensity of catabolite repression. Their relative importance depends on physiological conditions. Both proteins may respond to the cytoplasmic concentration of HPr(ser-P) and appropriate metabolites. CepA possibly binds sugar metabolites such as FBP as well as HPr(ser-P). Because HPr(his-P, ser-P) does not bind to CepA, the regulatory cascade is also sensitive to the external PTS sugar concentration. Mutational analyses (unpublished results) suggest that CepA may bind to a site that includes His-15. Interestingly, both the CepA protein in the Gram-positive bacterium, B. subtilis, and glycerol kinase in the Gram-negative bacterium, E. coli, sense both a PTS protein and a cytoplasmic metabolic intermediate. The same may be true of target permeases and enzymes in both types of organisms, but this possibility has not yet been tested. The parallels between the Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacterial regulatory systems are superficial at the mechanistic level but fundamental at the functional level. Thus, the PTS participates in regulation in both cases, and phosphorylation of its protein constituents plays key roles. However, the stimuli sensed, the transmission mechanisms, the central PTS regulatory proteins that effect allosteric regulation, and some of the target proteins are completely different. It seems clear that these two transmission mechanisms evolved independently. They provide a prime example of functional convergence.

Identification of a site in the phosphocarrier protein, HPr, which influences its interactions with sugar permeases of the bacterial phosphotransferase system: kinetic analyses employing site-specific mutants

The permeases of the Escherichia coli phosphoenolpyruvate:sugar phosphotransferase system (PTS), the sugar-specific enzymes II, are energized by sequential phosphoryl transfer from phosphoenolpyruvate to (i) enzyme I, (ii) the phosphocarrier protein HPr, (iii) the enzyme IIA domains of the permeases, and (iv) the enzyme IIBC domains of the permeases which transport and phosphorylate their sugar substrates. A number of site-specific mutants of HPr were examined by using kinetic approaches. Most of the mutations exerted minimal effects on the kinetic parameters characterizing reactions involving phosphoryl transfer from phospho-HPr to various sugars. However, when the well-conserved aspartyl 69 residue in HPr was changed to a glutamyl residue, the affinities for phospho-HPr of the enzymes II specific for mannitol, N-acetylglucosamine, and beta-glucosides decreased markedly without changing the maximal reaction rates. The same mutation reduced the spontaneous rate of phosphohistidyl HPr hydrolysis but did not appear to alter the rate of phosphoryl transfer from phospho-enzyme I to HPr. When the adjacent glutamyl residue 70 in HPr was changed to a lysyl residue, the Vmax values of the reactions catalyzed by the enzymes II were reduced, but the Km values remained unaltered. Changing this residue to alanine exerted little effect. Site-specific alterations in the C terminus of the beta-glucoside enzyme II which reduced the maximal reaction rate of phosphoryl transfer about 20-fold did not alter the relative kinetic parameters because of the aforementioned mutations in HPr. Published three-dimensional structural analyses of HPr and the complex of HPr with the glucose-specific enzyme IIA (IIAGlc) (homologous to the beta-glucoside and N-acetylglucosamine enzyme IIA domains) have revealed that residues 69 and 70 in HPr are distant from the active phosphorylation site and the IIAGlc binding interface in HPr. The results reported therefore suggest that residues D-69 and E-70 in HPr play important roles in controlling conformational aspects of HPr that influence (i) autophosphohydrolysis, (ii) the interaction of this protein with the sugar permeases of the bacterial phosphotransferase system, and (iii) catalysis of phosphoryl transfer to the IIA domains in these permeases.