Voluntary contraction shortens peripheral conduction time in response to transcranial magnetic stimulation of the brain

Test-retest reliability of navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation of the motor cortex

BACKGROUND

Because navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (nTMS) is increasingly used in neurosurgical research, interpretation of its results is of utmost importance.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the test-retest reliability of nTMS.

METHODS

Twelve healthy participants underwent nTMS at 2 different sessions separated by 10.3 ± 9.6 days. Investigated parameters included resting motor thresholds, hotspots, and centers of gravity calculated for the first dorsal interosseous, abductor pollicis brevis, extensor digitorum, tibial anterior, and abductor hallucis muscles.

RESULTS

Excellent reliability of resting motor thresholds was observed. Hotspots and centers of gravity showed moderate to excellent repeatability along the anteroposterior axis (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.54-0.89), whereas the x coordinate presented mainly poor to moderate stability (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.11-0.89). Movement of centers of gravity over sessions was 0.57 ± 0.32 cm, and hotspots laid 0.79 ± 0.47 cm apart. Calculation of coefficient of variation revealed high reliability of investigated parameters in upper extremities; in lower extremity muscles, high variation across sessions was observed.

CONCLUSION

nTMS can be considered a reliable tool, thus opening new fields of noninvasive investigations in neurosurgery. The results presented here should be considered in the interpretation of individual nTMS results.

Assessing the temporal reproducibility of human esophageal motor-evoked potentials to transcranial magnetic stimulation

BACKGROUND

Although the electrophysiological properties and reproducibility of somatic limb motor evoked potentials (MEPs) to transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) are well characterized, little is known about the reproducibility of MEPs for viscerosomatic structures such as the esophagus.

AIM

To determine the temporal reproducibility of esophageal MEPs to TMS.

METHODS

MEPs to TMS were recorded from the proximal esophagus, using a swallowed catheter housing a pair of electrodes, in eight healthy subjects at five stimulus intensities (SI) (motor threshold [MT] to 20% above MT). For each SI, 20 consecutive TMS stimuli at 5-second intervals were delivered over a single scalp site (dominant hemisphere at site exhibiting MT at lowest SI) and repeated 40 and 80 minutes thereafter. MEP amplitudes and latencies were measured, and means were sequentially calculated for each SI and then log-transformed. The repeatability coefficients (RC) for the three time points were calculated across each set of 20 stimuli and presented as an exponential ratio.

RESULTS

Best RC (amplitude/latency) were achieved at 120% SI relative to MT, being 1.8/1.2 (optimal = 1.0). For lower intensities of 115%, 110%, 105%, and 100% SI, the RC were 2.1/1.2, 2.1/1.1, 2.4/1.2, and 2.6/1.4, respectively. For all SI, the greatest reductions in RC occurred over the first 10 stimuli, with little additional gain beyond this number.

CONCLUSIONS

Latencies of esophageal MEP to TMS across intensities are highly reproducible, whereas amplitudes are more stimulus intensity-dependent, being most reliable and reproducible at the highest stimulus strengths.

SIGNIFICANCE

Using careful parameters, TMS can be used reliably in future studies of viscerosomatic structures, although the size of the response variability needs to be taken into account when assessing changes in cortico-fugal activity.

Motor cortical excitability in schizophrenia

BACKGROUND

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) provides a method to examine cortico-cortical motor excitability and hemispheric asymmetry in unmedicated and medicated schizophrenia patients.

METHODS

Fourteen right-handed schizophrenia patients (seven on conventional neuroleptics and seven medication-free) were compared with seven right-handed, age- and gender-matched normal control subjects. Motor threshold for induction of motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) and bihemispheric intracortical inhibition and facilitation were measured with single-pulse and paired-pulse TMS.

RESULTS

Medicated patients showed an approximately 5% higher motor thresholds in both hemispheres than unmedicated patients and control subjects. Normal control subjects had a nearly 10% higher threshold for the left than the right hemisphere, whereas the opposite was true for the patient groups (5-10% higher threshold on the right than the left). Medicated patients showed significantly decreased intracortical inhibition relative to unmedicated patients and control subjects. This difference was more pronounced for the right than for the left hemisphere.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with conventional neuroleptics is associated with increased motor threshold and decreased intracortical inhibition, whereas unmedicated patients did not differ from normal control subjects on these measures; however, schizophrenia may be characterized by a reversed pattern of interhemispheric corticospinal excitability.

Interaction of transcranial magnetic stimulation and electrical transmastoid stimulation in human subjects

Transcranial magnetic stimulation activates corticospinal neurones directly and transsynaptically and hence, activates motoneurones and results in a response in the muscle. Transmastoid stimulation results in a similar muscle response through activation of axons in the spinal cord. This study was designed to determine whether the two stimuli activate the same descending axons. Responses to transcranial magnetic stimuli paired with electrical transmastoid stimuli were examined in biceps brachii in human subjects. Twelve interstimulus intervals (ISIs) from -6 ms (magnet before transmastoid) to 5 ms were investigated. When responses to the individual stimuli were set at 10-15 % of the maximal M-wave, responses to the paired stimuli were larger than expected at ISIs of -6 and -5 ms but were reduced in size at ISIs of -2 to 1 ms and at 3 to 5 ms. With individual responses of 3-5 % of maximal M-wave, facilitation still occurred at ISIs of -6 and -5 ms and depression of the paired response at ISIs of 0, 1, 4 and 5 ms. The interaction of the response to transmastoid stimulation with the multiple descending volleys elicited by magnetic stimulation of the cortex is complex. However, depression of the response to the paired stimuli at short ISIs is consistent with an occlusive interaction in which an antidromic volley evoked by the transmastoid stimulus collides with and annihilates descending action potentials evoked by the transcranial magnetic stimulus. Thus, it is consistent with the two stimuli activating some of the same corticospinal axons.

Transcranial magnetic stimulation coregistered with MRI: a comparison of a guided versus blind stimulation technique and its effect on evoked compound muscle action potentials

INTRODUCTION AND METHODS

Compound muscle action potentials (CMAPs) elicited by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) are characterized by enormous variability, even when attempts are made to stimulate the same scalp location. This report describes the results of a comparison of the spatial errors in coil placement and resulting CMAP characteristics using a guided and blind TMS stimulation technique. The former uses a coregistration system, which displays the intersection of the peak TMS induced electric field with the cortical surface. The latter consists of the conventional placement of the TMS coil on the optimal scalp position for activation of the first dorsal interossei (FDI) muscle.

RESULTS

Guided stimulation resulted in significantly improved spatial precision for exciting the corticospinal projection to the FDI compared to blind stimulation. This improved precision of coil placement was associated with a significantly increased probability of eliciting FDI responses. Although these responses tended to have larger amplitudes and areas, the coefficient of variation between guided and blind stimulation induced CMAPs did not significantly differ.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study demonstrate that guided stimulation improves the ability to precisely revisit previously stimulated cortical loci as well as increasing the probability of eliciting TMS induced CMAPs. Response variability, however, is due to factors other than coil placement.

Optimization of facilitation related to threshold in transcranial magnetic stimulation

OBJECTIVES

To attain the standardized procedure for optimal facilitation, we analyzed motor-evoked potential (MEP) responses to the degree of voluntary contraction and stimulus intensity.

METHODS

Fifteen normal subjects were included. MEPs were elicited at thenar muscles during rest and at gradual voluntary contraction (MVC), using 10, 30, and 50% of MVC. During rest and each contraction, the excitability threshold at rest (RET) and at contraction (CET) were determined. Consecutive stimuli were applied, with the intensity of ratio increments (110-150% of ET).

RESULTS

The RET showed a remarkable decrease after contraction. Shortening of latency reached a saturation level at 10% of MVC. Amplitude reached a saturation level at 30% of MVC with 62.7+/-8.5% of the maximum output, which is equal to 140% intensity of CET, and 110% of RET. The MEP amplitudes at rest and at 10% MVC were influenced by their ETs, but those measured above 30% of MVC were not related.

CONCLUSIONS

The procedure recommended for optimal facilitation is as follows: to achieve minimal latency of MEPs, a minimal contraction (10% of MVC) with RET intensity is sufficient and for maximal amplitude, a moderate contraction (30% of MVC) with 110% of RET intensity is adequate.