Human parvovirus B19 serology with recombinant VP1 and VP2 antigens: diagnosis of acute infections by detecting B19-specific IgM and IgA antibodies

Human Parvoviruses

Parvovirus B19 (B19V) and human bocavirus 1 (HBoV1), members of the large Parvoviridae family, are human pathogens responsible for a variety of diseases. For B19V in particular, host features determine disease manifestations. These viruses are prevalent worldwide and are culturable in vitro, and serological and molecular assays are available but require careful interpretation of results. Additional human parvoviruses, including HBoV2 to -4, human parvovirus 4 (PARV4), and human bufavirus (BuV) are also reviewed. The full spectrum of parvovirus disease in humans has yet to be established. Candidate recombinant B19V vaccines have been developed but may not be commercially feasible. We review relevant features of the molecular and cellular biology of these viruses, and the human immune response that they elicit, which have allowed a deep understanding of pathophysiology.

Comparative evaluation of three recombinant antigen-based enzyme immunoassays for detection of IgM and IgG antibodies to human parvovirus B19

BACKGROUND

Diagnosis of acute and past infection with parvovirus B19 is based on detection of IgM and IgG antibodies.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate two commercial recombinant antigen-based enzyme immunoassay (EIA) test kits for detection of IgM and IgG antibodies to parvovirus B19 and to compare the commercial EIAs to in-house EIA test procedures.

STUDY DESIGN

A panel of 121 sera was used to compare the three IgM EIAs. The panel included 84 sera submitted for parvovirus B19 testing and 37 sera that were IgM positive for other viral pathogens. The same serum panel plus an additional 14 sera submitted for B19 testing was used to compare the three IgG EIAs. The commercial EIAs were performed according to manufacturers' instructions. Using the in-house EIA test procedures as the reference, sensitivity and specificity for each of the commercial EIAs was determined.

RESULTS

The commercial B19 IgM EIAs showed agreements of 95.0 and 93.4% to the in-house IgM EIA. Compared to the in-house B19 IgM EIA, the commercial B19 IgM EIAs were 97.4 and 97.5% sensitive, respectively. Specificities were 93.5 and 91.4%, respectively. Sensitivities for the commercial IgG EIAs, compared to in-house IgG EIA, were 88.0 and 85.2%, respectively, and specificities were 94.1 and 98.0%.

CONCLUSION

We found that the commercial parvovirus B19 IgM and IgG EIAs are comparable to standard in-house EIAs and are suitable for testing for B19 antibodies in human sera.

Evaluation of serological assays for identification of parvovirus B19 immunoglobulin M

Three different enzyme immunoassays (EIAs) (Parvoscan-B19, IBL parvovirus B19, and IDEIA parvovirus B19) and one immunofluorescence assay (Biotrin Parvo B19 IFA) were evaluated for detection of parvovirus B19 immunoglobulin M (IgM) antibodies in 203 clinical serum samples. An IgM antibody capture radioimmunoassay was used as a reference test. Serum specimens obtained from patients with clinical symptoms suggestive of parvovirus B19 infections were used to evaluate the sensitivities of the assays, which were shown to be comparable for the Biotrin IFA and IDEIA (97%) and lower for the other two EIAs (90%). In order to test the specificity of the assays, clinical serum samples with IgM antibodies against other viruses were examined, as well as sera with rheumatoid factor activity and sera from healthy pregnant women. The specificities of B19 IgM antibody detection were 96% for the Biotrin IFA, 96% for IDEIA, 90% for Parvoscan, and 88% for the IBL assay. These results show that all four assays can be recommended for diagnostic purposes, although false-positive results may be seen with other acute viral infections, healthy pregnant women, and rheumatoid factor-positive samples.