Differentiation of primary from secondary anti-EBNA-1-negative cases by determination of avidity of VCA-IgG

Investigation of atypical serological profiles for Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)

BACKGROUND

Commercial immunoassays that detect IgG and IgM directed toward VCA and IgG EBNA are used in combination to assess EBV immune status. However, this strategy does not always confirm/exclude recent/past EBV infection or absence of immunity.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of our study was to perform complementary investigations on samples with atypical EBV serological profiles, in order to identify the clinical situation they correspond to.

STUDY DESIGN

EBV serology was performed using EBV VCA IgM/IgG and EBNA IgG LXL® DiaSorin assay. Complementary investigations included ELISA IgM VCA, immunoblots, CMV IgM/IgG and CMV IgG avidity, and EBV PCR.

RESULTS

In our study, 12810 EBV serological results were analyzed, and 3580 atypical profiles were detected (28 %). Among these latter, isolated VCA IgG represented 42.9 %, the three positive markers accounted for 29.1 %, isolated EBNA IgG represented 18.5 %, isolated VCA IgM accounted for 6.4 % and positive VCA IgM & positive EBNA IgG represented 3.1 %. VCA IgG detected alone were specific in 100 % cases and EBNA IgG detected alone were specific in 91.7 % cases. VCA IgM detected alone were false positive or due to a cross reaction with CMV in 52.8 % cases. The pattern positive VCA IgM and positive EBNA IgG correspond to a false positive in VCA IgM, EBNA IgG or both in 83.4 % cases. Positive EBV VCA IgM/IgG and EBNA IgG were unreliable to detect active EBV infection in 66.7 % cases.

DISCUSSION

Atypical EBV serological profiles may correspond to several clinical situations and complementary investigations allow to determine the immune status in more than 98.5 % cases.

Dimethyl Fumarate Treatment Reduces the Amount but Not the Avidity of the Epstein-Barr Virus Capsid-Antigen-Specific Antibody Response in Multiple Sclerosis: A Pilot Study

(1) Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic inflammatory disease of autoimmune origin. The Epstein−Barr virus (EBV) is associated with the onset of MS, as almost all patients have high levels of EBV-specific antibodies as a result of a previous infection. We evaluated longitudinally the effects of dimethyl fumarate (DMF), a first-line treatment of MS, on the quantity and quality of EBV-specific IgG in MS patients. (2) Serum samples from 17 MS patients receiving DMF were taken before therapy (T0) and after 1 week (T1) and 1 (T2), 3 (T3) and 6 (T4) months of treatment. Anti-EBV nuclear antigen (EBNA)-1 and capsid antigen (CA) IgG levels and anti-CA IgG avidity were measured in all samples. (3) Serum levels of anti-CA IgG were lower at T1 (p = 0.0341), T2 (p = 0.0034), T3 (p < 0.0001) and T4 (p = 0.0023) than T0. These differences were partially confirmed also in anti-EBNA-1 IgG levels (T3 vs. T0, p = 0.0034). All patients had high-avidity anti-CA IgG at T0, and no changes were observed during therapy. (4): DMF can reduce the amount but not the avidity of the anti-EBV humoral immune response in MS patients from the very early stages of treatment.

The variability of the serological response to SARS-corona virus-2: Potential resolution of ambiguity through determination of avidity (functional affinity)

Data on the serological response toward severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) in 16 recent reports were analyzed and a high degree of variability was shown. Immunoglobulin M (IgM) responses were either found earlier than IgG, or together with IgG, later than IgG, or were missing. Therefore, clear distinctions between early, intermediate, and past infections are obviously not possible merely on the basis of IgM and IgG determinations. A review of publications on the serology of other virus groups shows that variable IgM responses can be found as well and therefore are not unique for SARS‐CoV‐2 infections. A model to explain this variability is proposed. The inclusion of avidity determination into regular diagnostic procedures has allowed to resolve such “atypical” serological constellations. The potential use of avidity determination for the diagnosis of COVID‐19, for risk assessment, epidemiological studies, analysis of cross reactions, as well as for the control of vaccination programs is suggested and discussed.

The serological response to SARS CoV‐2 infection is highly variable.

The mere detection of specific IgM and IgG does not allow to distinguish between acute and past infection.

The variable IgM and IgG responses after SARS CoV‐2 infection are analogous to serological findings in other virus systems.

Variable IgM and IgG responses can be rationally explained by models that describe immunoglobulin production by the immune system.

Avidity determination of SARS CoV‐2 IgG is suggested for resolution of diagnostic ambiguity.

Pathobiologic Roles of Epstein-Barr Virus-Encoded MicroRNAs in Human Lymphomas

Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) is a human γ-herpesvirus implicated in several human malignancies, including a wide range of lymphomas. Several molecules encoded by EBV in its latent state are believed to be related to EBV-induced lymphomagenesis, among which microRNAs-small RNAs with a posttranscriptional regulating role-are of great importance. The genome of EBV encodes 44 mature microRNAs belonging to two different classes, including BamHI-A rightward transcript (BART) and Bam HI fragment H rightward open reading frame 1 (BHRF1), with different expression levels in different EBV latency types. These microRNAs might contribute to the pathogenetic effects exerted by EBV through targeting self mRNAs and host mRNAs and interfering with several important cellular mechanisms such as immunosurveillance, cell proliferation, and apoptosis. In addition, EBV microRNAs can regulate the surrounding microenvironment of the infected cells through exosomal transportation. Moreover, these small molecules could be potentially used as molecular markers. In this review, we try to present an updated and extensive view of the role of EBV-encoded miRNAs in human lymphomas.

Exercise and the Athlete With Infectious Mononucleosis

OBJECTIVE

To determine appropriate management of the active individual with infectious mononucleosis (IM), including issues of diagnosis, the determination of splenomegaly, and other measures of disease status, the relationship of the disease to chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS), and the risks of exercise at various points in the disease process.

DATA SOURCES

An Ovid/MEDLINE search (January 1996-June 2015) was widely supplemented by "similar articles" found in Ovid/MEDLINE and PubMed, reference lists, and personal files.

MAIN RESULTS

Clinical diagnoses of IM are unreliable. Traditional laboratory indicators (lymphocytosis, abnormal lymphocytes, and a heterophile-positive slide test) can be supplemented by more sensitive and more specific but also more costly Epstein-Barr antigen determinations. Clinical estimates of splenomegaly are fallible. Laboratory determinations, commonly by 2D ultrasonography, must take account of methodology, the formulae used in calculations and the individual's body size. The SD of normal values matches the typical increase of size in IM, but repeat measurements can help to monitor regression of the disease. The main risks to the athlete are spontaneous splenic rupture (seen in 0.1%-0.5% of patients and signaled by acute abdominal pain) and progression to chronic fatigue, best avoided by 3 to 4 weeks of restricted activity followed by graded reconditioning. A full recovery of athletic performance is usual with 2 to 3 months of conservative management.

CONCLUSIONS

Infectious mononucleosis is a common issue for young athletes. But given accurate diagnosis and the avoidance of splenic rupture and progression to CFS through a few weeks of restricted activity, long-term risks to the health of athletes are few.

Epstein-Barr Virus: Clinical Diagnostics

The vast majority of the human adult population is infected with Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), and the majority of the EBV-infected individuals tolerates the infection well, without any further symptoms after primary infection. In cases of individuals which undergo primary infection in the form of an infectious mononucleosis, or which have undergone primary infection in their past, it is sometimes important to appraise symptomatic disease or differentiate infectious mononucleosis from other conditions. In these cases, serological methods, i.e., immunofluorescence, ELISA, or Western blot, are the methods of choice to come to an unequivocal diagnostic conclusion, while the detection and quantification of viral DNA through PCR plays a minor role.On the other hand, in a minority of the human population, EBV infection is associated or causally linked with autoimmune or malignant disease. Especially in the bone marrow or solid organ transplanted, or in otherwise severely immune-suppressed patients, prolonged EBV primary infection or EBV reactivation from latency may be a serious and life-threatening complication which needs to be diagnosed the faster the better, in order to take therapeutic steps in time. Determining the serostatus correctly is also important in these cases. However, the direct and quantitative detection of viral DNA are of importance for the diagnosis of serious EBV disease and its monitoring.In the following, we give an overview of diagnostic methods to accurately determine EBV serostatus and viral load. We evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of each method and report on the diagnostic significance of each and how to resolve diagnostic problems in case of uncertainties. For practical procedures, we refer to the detailed instruction manuals of the respective test kit manufacturers which have to be closely followed for reliable results.

Epstein-Barr Virus-Positive Diffuse Large B cell Lymphoma in the Experience of a Tertiary Medical Center in Poland

The role of Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) in the biology and clinical characteristics of diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is still poorly defined. A new provisional entity EBV-positive DLBCL of the elderly has been described in Asian population. Its incidence and prognosis remains unknown in middle European patients. Clinical data and tissue samples were collected from 74 Caucasian patients with DLBCL, aged between 23 and 86 years, treated at a single institution. Lymphoma morphology was reassessed, laboratory procedures included in situ hybridization specific for EBV-encoded small RNAs (EBER), immunohistochemical staining for latent membrane protein and serological testing for EBV-specific antibodies. EBER staining revealed 12.2 % of EBV-positive cases, whereas 9.5 % were diagnosed as EBV-positive DLBCL of the elderly. Serologic EBV markers did not correlate with the presence of EBV in tissue samples (P > 0.10). Elderly EBV-positive cases had lower BCL-6 (P = 0.038) and higher CD30 (P = 0.049) expression and were characterized by higher progression risk (median time-to-progression 12.5 months vs not reached; P = 0.029) and a trend towards worse overall survival (median overall survival 24.5 months vs not reached; P = 0.059). EBV-positive DLBCL of the elderly occurs relatively frequently in Polish population and may be associated with inferior prognosis in comparison with DLBCL, not otherwise specified.

The impact of serological features in Chinese children with primary or past Epstein-Barr virus infections

BACKGROUND

Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) is a primary cause of infectious mononucleosis (IM) throughout the world, and the positive serology rate changes over time in infected individuals. The aim of this study was to explore the serological and clinical features among Chinese children with EBV infections. A retrospective study of children suspected of having IM was conducted. Peripheral blood samples were analyzed by indirect immunofluorescence to detect any EBV-specific antibodies. Samples were classed as positive (+) or negative (-) to immunoglobulins M (IgM) or G (IgG) to the viral capsid antigen (VCA) or EBV nuclear antigen (EBNA). A standard medical history was taken, including epidemiological data and noting any clinical manifestations.

RESULTS

Of 317 children, 37 were aged <8 months; 10 of these were VCA-IgM+, and the youngest was aged 1 month; 280 were aged >8 months. The EBV infection rate ranged from 21.4% among subjects aged 8-12 months to 84.2% in those aged >9 years. Serologically, children who tested as VCA-IgM+ together with VCA-IgG and EBNA-IgG- had longer hospital stays with more palatal petechiae and lymphadenopathy, especially among those with an atypical lymphocyte count of >10%. Children with the serological patterns [VCA-IgM-, VCA-IgG+ and EBNA-IgG-] and [VCA-IgM+ VCA-IgG+ and EBNA-IgG+] did not show specific clinical features.

CONCLUSIONS

Infants aged <8 months could be infected with EBV. About 84% of these Chinese children aged >9 years had serological evidence of EBV infection, whereas IM peaked in patients aged 2-3 years.

Longitudinal observation of Epstein-Barr virus antibodies in athletes during a competitive season

Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) serology continues to be the first diagnostic test when infectious mononucleosis is suspected. Due to possible mild immunosuppression in competitive athletes, EBV reactivation determined by increases in salivary viral load have been identified as one possible cause in recurrent respiratory infections. The long-term variation in EBV antibody levels in athletes compared to a control group remains unclear. The purpose of the study was to investigate the time course of changes in concentration of EBV antibodies in athletes with special emphasis on antibodies against early antigens (EAs) and avidity determination. During a competition season of approximately 12 months, the serological status of 15 biathletes (age 27 ± 3 years, 7 female, 8 male, international to Olympic level) was compared with 11 controls (age 23 ± 1 years; 1 female 10 male) at multiple time points. In addition, 43 healthy swimmers (age 22 ± 4 years, 18 female, 25 male, national to international level) were tested to validate the results with only two time points interspersed by approximately 6 months of intensive physical exercise. Analysis of quantitative antibody intensity bands revealed stable values during a competition season. In particular, IgG-antibodies against EAs may persist and were found in 15% of past infections in swimmers exhibiting fluctuations in concentration after 6 months. These results provide evidence that positive Anti-EA-IgG may persist in healthy athletes and thus, should not be used to diagnose EBV reactivations or to identify a compromised immune function.

Serological diagnosis of Epstein-Barr virus infection: Problems and solutions

Serological tests for antibodies specific for Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) antigens are frequently used to define infection status and for the differential diagnosis of other pathogens responsible for mononucleosis syndrome. Using only three parameters [viral capsid antigen (VCA) IgG, VCA IgM and EBV nuclear antigen (EBNA)-1 IgG],it is normally possible to distinguish acute from past infection: the presence of VCA IgM and VCA IgG without EBNA-1 IgG indicates acute infection, whereas the presence of VCA IgG and EBNA-1 IgG without VCA IgM is typical of past infection. However, serological findings may sometimes be difficult to interpret as VCA IgG can be present without VCA IgM or EBNA-1 IgG in cases of acute or past infection, or all the three parameters may be detected simultaneously in the case of recent infection or during the course of reactivation. A profile of isolated EBNA-1 IgG may also create some doubts. In order to interpret these patterns correctly, it is necessary to determine IgG avidity, identify anti-EBV IgG and IgM antibodies by immunoblotting, and look for heterophile antibodies, anti-EA (D) antibodies or viral genome using molecular biology methods. These tests make it possible to define the status of the infection and solve any problems that may arise in routine laboratory practice.

The role of IgG avidity determination in diagnosis of Epstein-Barr virus infection in immunocompetent and immunocompromised patients

There is a high degree of variability in the serologic response to Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection, especially in viral capsid antigen (VCA)-IgM antibodies. Therefore, additional tests are needed to confirm primary infection. We evaluated the value of IgG avidity determination in diagnosis of EBV infection in immunocompetent and immunocompromised patients. A total of 236 serum samples from immunocompetent patients with symptoms suggestive of EBV infection were tested for the presence of VCA-IgM/IgG antibodies and IgG avidity. Using IgG avidity, acute primary infection was confirmed in 56.7% of the immunocompetent patients with positive and in 1.8% of patients with negative VCA-IgM. Recent primary infection was documented in 8.9% of the IgM positive and 3.5% of the IgM negative patients. In patients with indeterminate serology (equivocal IgM), 6.7% were classified by avidity index (AI) as acute primary infection, 10.0% as post-acute and 83.3% as past infection cases. Concerning the 32 immunocompromised patients, recent primary infection was documented in 3 of the 14 IgM positive patients. High AI was detected in 11 of these patients, indicating an IgM response due to reactivation. Determination of IgG avidity in combination with classical serologic markers seems to be a reliable method to confirm primary infection both in immunocompetent and immunocompromised patients. It may be especially useful to differentiate cases of primary infection in patients with undetectable VCA-IgM antibodies or indeterminate routine EBV serology.

Search for Anti-EA(D) Antibodies in Subjects with an "Isolated VCA IgG" Pattern

The presence of an “isolated viral capsid antigen (VCA) IgG” pattern in serum is not easy to interpret without the aid of further tests, such as specific immunoblotting or a virus genome search, that often give rise to organisational and economic problems. However, one alternative is to use an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) to detect anti-early antigen (EA) antibodies, which can be found in about 85% of subjects with acute Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infections. The purpose of this work was to search for anti-EA(D) antibodies in 130 samples with an isolated VCA IgG pattern at ELISA screening and classified as being indicative of past (102 cases) or acute (28 cases) infection on the basis of the immunoblotting results. Thirty-seven samples (28.5%) were positive for anti-EA(D), of which 25 (89.3%) had been classified by immunoblotting as indicating acute and 12 (11.8%) past EBV infection. This difference was statistically significant (P < .01). The results of our search for anti-EA(D) antibodies correctly identified nearly 90% of acute (presence) or past EBV infections (absence). When other tests are not available, the search for anti-EA antibodies may therefore be helpful in diagnosing patients with an isolated VCA IgG pattern at screening tests.

Seroepidemiology of EBV and interpretation of the "isolated VCA IgG" pattern

The presence of VCA IgG in the absence of VCA IgM and EBNA-1 IgG antibodies makes classifying EBV infection more difficult as this serological picture can be seen in the case of past infection with EBNA-1 IgG loss or non-appearance, or acute infections with the early disappearance or delayed onset of VCA IgM. The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of this pattern in 2,422 outpatients with suspected EBV infection examined in 2005-2006, and to interpret its significance by means of immunoblotting. One hundred and seventy-seven (7.3%) of the patients were VCA IgG-positive, VCA IgM-negative and EBNA-1 IgG-negative, 15 of whom (8.5%) presented with heterophile antibodies. Analysis by age class showed that the prevalence of isolated VCA IgG ranged from 4.5% in the subjects aged 1-10 years to 9% in those aged >60 years. Immunoblotting allowed 18.9% of the cases to be classified as acute and 81.1% as past infections, the latter being observed in about 37% of the patients aged less than 10 years and in 100% of those aged >30 years. Therefore, in our case series, the presence of isolated VCA IgG was associated usually with past infection, particularly among adults. In children aged less than 10 years, it was associated mainly with acute infection but as past infection may be present in about one-third of such children, this possibility should not be overlooked.

Epstein-Barr Virus Serostatus

PURPOSE

To investigate the Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) serostatus in an athletic endurance population, especially the prevalence of complex aberrant EBV antibody patterns. In addition, the purpose was to determine whether serology in athletes is more complex than in the general population.

METHODS

The study protocol included serological testing of 202 advanced endurance athletes (biathlon, cycling, nordic skiing (state to international level); mean age 19 +/- 4) and 200 control subjects (mean age 23 +/- 2). Twenty-microliter serum samples were examined using a strip immunoassay with antigens produced by recombinant techniques for detection of EBV IgG antibodies: anti-EBNA-1 (anti-EBV nuclear antigen-1), anti-p18, anti-p23, anti-p138, anti-p54, and anti-BZLF-1. Avidity determination was used to differentiate further between acute, recent, and past infections.

RESULTS

Athletes showed 35 negative (17%), 6 unresolvable (3%), 1 acute (0.5%), 11 recent (5%), 122 past (61%), and 27 aberrant past (mainly anti-EBNA-1 negative) (13.5%) cases. The control group showed 31 negative (16%), 4 unresolvable (2%), 1 acute (0.5%), 1 recent (0.5%), 135 past (68%), and 28 (14.0%) aberrant past cases. Although endurance athletes included more recent infections (several months since acute infection), there was no significant difference (P = 0.144) in the total constellation of EBV serostatus between the groups.

CONCLUSION

No evidence was found for the assumption that endurance athletes are more susceptible to EBV infections than the general population. In addition, no differences were found with respect to serological classical and aberrant complicated patterns between athletes and the control group. Those cases that may lead to false diagnoses of acute EBV infection in previously used test systems because of a negative anti-EBNA-1 are common in both groups but were unambiguously resolved by the Recomline EBV IgG test applied here.

Measurement of EBV-IgG anti-VCA avidity aids the early and reliable diagnosis of primary EBV infection

Current serological methods for the diagnosis of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection still differentiate poorly between primary infection and reactivation. This is particularly true when IgG and IgM antibodies are present simultaneously and only a single serum sample is provided for analysis. The demonstration of the IgG avidity state has the potential to distinguish recent from past or reactivated infection. An analysis of the kinetics of avidity maturation of anti-VCA antibodies in primary EBV infection was undertaken with longitudinally collected sets of sera from 28 well-characterised EBV cases and in sera from 35 cases with previous EBV infection and recent primary infection due to HIV, CMV, or hepatitis A. Antibodies directed against the viral capsid antigen (VCA) and Epstein-Barr nuclear antigen (EBNA-1) were sought, using a commercial enzyme immunoassay (EIA). In parallel with standard IgG anti-VCA detection, serum was incubated with 8 M urea to disrupt low-avidity complexes to allow calculation of the percentage avidity. In cases with primary EBV infection, the mean avidity rose from 54% at 6 weeks to 82% by 28 weeks after the onset of symptoms, but remained lower than that of the control sera (96%). The addition of the avidity measurement improved the sensitivity of IgG and IgM anti-VCA testing in diagnosis of primary EBV infection from 93% to 100%. The specificity of IgM anti-VCA testing alone was poor, with 14 of 35 cases (49%) demonstrating false-positive results, but it improved to 97% by the demonstration of high-avidity IgG anti-VCA. The combination of negative IgG anti-EBNA and low-avidity IgG anti-VCA had a sensitivity and specificity of 100%. The routine addition of IgG anti-VCA avidity estimation to diagnostic EBV serology is recommended.

Comparative evaluation of the use of immunoblots and of IgG avidity assays as confirmatory tests for the diagnosis of acute EBV infections

BACKGROUND

Despite the availability of several different markers for Epstein--Barr virus (EBV) serology, the EBV status of some patients cannot be resolved from a single serum sample with routine testing. To avoid the requirement of follow-up samples, supplementary tests have to be used in these cases.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the usefulness of avidity and immunoblot assays as supplementary tests for the diagnosis of acute EBV infections.

STUDY DESIGN

Three groups of samples for which a definite diagnosis on the EBV status could not be obtained with the routine serological tests were further examined by an EBV IgG avidity assay, by an immunoblot based on a lysate of EBV infected cells, and by a second immunoblot based on recombinant EBV antigens. The three groups consisted of 38 samples with negative/borderline EB nuclear antigen 1 (EBNA-1) antibodies, negative/borderline EBV IgM and positive EBV IgG; 10 samples with indeterminate EBNA-1 and/or EBV IgM assays because of control antigen reactions; and 4 samples with positive EBV IgM results that were not plausible.

RESULTS

The avidity assay differentiated between acute and past infections for all samples. In contrast, some cases remained unresolved with both the recombinant and the lysate immunoblot. Two samples were incorrectly classified with the lysate immunoblot. Interpretation of the lysate immunoblot banding patterns was complicated when anticellular antibodies were present.

CONCLUSION

Avidity testing appears to be the confirmatory method of choice to differentiate between acute and past EBV infections.

The use of semi-automated EBV IgG avidity determination for the diagnosis of infectious mononucleosis

The diagnosis of acute Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection is based frequently on the combination of positive viral capsid antigen (VCA) IgM antibodies and negative EB viral nuclear antigen 1 (EBNA-1) IgG antibodies. However, both VCA IgM and EBNA-1 IgG can provide false positive and false negative results. Therefore, situations in which the EBV serology remains unclear are not uncommon. Determination of EBV IgG avidity can clarify the EBV status in these patients. So far, mainly immunofluorescence assays have been used for this purpose. These tests are laborious, their evaluation is subjective, and automation is difficult. Therefore, two commercially available microtiter plate enzyme immunoassays (EIA) were compared for their usefulness for semi-automated EBV IgG avidity determination. One assay is based on a mixture of EBV antigens, the other assay uses a synthetic peptide of the VCA-complex. Patient sera of confirmed acute and past EBV infections were tested for avidity by both assays. The results with the antigen mixture assay proved to be highly sensitive (100%) and specific (100%). Avidity index calculations on the basis of one-point-quantification titers gave better results than calculations using OD values. Determination of EBV IgG avidity by the peptide assay was complicated by the fact that it was less sensitive than the antigen mixture assay for IgG detection in acute EBV infections. On the other hand, about 30% of the samples had to be retested with the peptide assay in a higher dilution because the IgG units in initial testing fell outside the range covered by the standard curve. Using OD values of the peptide EIA, the sensitivity was 99% but the specificity of detection of acute EBV infections was only 86%. Thus, while the peptide EBV avidity assay is unsuitable as a confirmatory assay, avidity testing with the antigen mixture assay is a useful tool to resolve equivocal EBV serologies. Avidity assays on the basis of EIA can be automated which should lead to wider use of this methodology.

Evaluation of three commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays and two latex agglutination assays for diagnosis of primary Epstein-Barr virus infection

Three commercially available enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) from Gull, Biotest, and Behring (Enzygnost) and two latex agglutination tests for heterophile antibodies (Monolatex [Biotest] and Mono-Lex [Trinity Laboratories]) were evaluated for the diagnosis of primary Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection and EBV seropositivity. Two hundred fourteen consecutive samples from 197 patients with symptoms of primary EBV infection were analyzed by the five assays at a clinical microbiology laboratory. The samples were also analyzed independently by immunofluorescence methods at a reference laboratory. According to the reference methods, 37 patients (40 serum samples) had primary EBV infections, 120 patients (127 serum samples) had had past EBV infections, 33 patients (36 serum samples) were seronegative, and 7 patients (11 serum samples) exhibited atypical reactions. The respective sensitivities and specificities for the diagnosis of primary EBV infection were 95 and 100% for the Gull assays, 100 and 94% for the Biotest assays, and 100 and 89%, for the Enzygnost assays. The Monolatex and Mono-Lex methods showed similar sensitivities and specificities (78 to 85% and 100 to 99%, respectively) for the diagnosis of primary EBV infection. This study demonstrates the usefulness of commercially available assays for the rapid diagnosis of primary EBV infection, but also the importance of large-scale testing of routine samples before choosing an assay.

Activation of a varicella-zoster virus-specific IgA response during acute Epstein-Barr virus infection

The influence of an acute Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection on the serological parameters of persistent varicella-zoster virus (VZV) and herpes simplex virus (HSV) was studied. Sera from 161 patients with infectious mononucleosis caused by EBV and 178 age-matched controls were tested for HSV- and VZV-specific IgA. 98.7 percent of VZV-IgG-positive controls were negative for VZV-IgA, pointing to the stringent control of latent VZV in healthy individuals. During acute EBV infection, 33.8% of VZV-IgG-positive infectious mononucleosis patients produced VZV-specific IgA. This result may be explained either by reactivation of VZV due to transient suppression of cellular immune functions during acute EBV infection or by polyclonal stimulation caused by EBV. Due to the high incidence of HSV-IgA in healthy HSV-IgG-positive individuals, only a marginal effect of acute EBV infection on the appearance of HSV-specific IgA was found.

Avidities of IgG directed against viral capsid antigen or early antigen: useful markers for significant Epstein-Barr virus serology

Classical Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) serology can be misleading in some cases due to the variability of the viral capsid antigen (VCA)-IgM response, persistent or reactivated VCA-IgM, or loss of anti-EBNA-1 during suppression of the cellular immune system. Therefore, we studied the usefulness and significance of avidity determinations of VCA-IgG and EA-IgG to achieve unequivocal interpretation of serological results. Avidities of EBV capsid antigen-specific IgG (VCA-IgG) and early antigen-specific IgG (EA-IgG) were determined by indirect immunofluorescence during and after acute EBV infection. Low-avidity antibodies were removed from antigen-antibody complexes by incubation with 6 M urea for 3 minutes. The analysis of 105 sera taken at defined time spans with regard to the onset of clinical symptoms allowed us to determine the kinetics of maturation of avidity of VCA-IgG. All sera had low-avidity antibodies at the onset of disease. More than 90% of the sera showed an avidity index below 0.25 during the first 10 days after the onset of disease. Fifty percent of the sera exhibited an avidity index of 0.25 or above 20-30 days after the onset of clinical symptoms. Sera from past infections uniformly exhibited avidity indices of 0.5 or 1. Avidity of EA-IgG may still be low when avidity of VCA-IgG is already borderline or high, thus allowing further differentiation of acute and recent infections. Avidity determination represents an important additional marker of serology in classical cases and allows diagnosis in aberrant cases, such as acute infections with low or undetectable VCA-IgM.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)