A pilot study of vinorelbine on a weekly schedule in recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck

Mitomycin «C» and Vinorelbine as Second Line Chemotherapy for Metastatic Breast Carcinoma

Aims and background

Patients with metastatic breast carcinoma resistant to first line chemotherapy may require further treatment. Results o second line chemotherapy are still largerly unsatisfactory. For this reason a phase II study on the combination of mitomycin C and vinorelbine was carried out.

Methods

Forty patients with anthracycline pretreated metastatic breast cancer were treated with a combination of mitomycin C 10 mg/m2 i.v. on day 1, and vinorelbine 25 mg/m2 i.v. on days 1 and 8. This cycle was repeated every 28 days. Responses were evaluated according to the WHO criteria.

Results

A major objective response was recorded in 16 cases (40%; 95% confidence limits 32%-48%), with 2 patients (5%) obtaining a complete response with a median duration of 8.0+ months, and 14 (35%) a partial response with a median duration of 7.3+ months. Nine patients (23%) showed no change, and 15 progressed. Patients who did not meet the minimal required criteria to be evaluable were considered as treatment failures. Responses were seen at all sites of disease, but skin, nodal, and soft tissue lesion were more che-mosensitive than liver, lung, and bone ones. The mean survival of patients with complete and partial responses was 8.9+ months, whereas that of patients with no change or progressive disease was 7.8 and 6.0 months respectively. Treatment was very well tolerated by most patients. Gastrointestinal toxicity was mild. Grade 2 leukopenia was recorder in 45% of patients, and grade 3 leukopenia in only 10%. Grade 2 thrombocytopenia was seen in 5%. Reversible mild to moderate constipation occurred in 45%, but no case of severe neurotoxicity was observed.

Conclusions

Our data suggest that the combination of mitomycin C and vinorelbine is active in metastatic breast carcinoma refractory to first line chemotherapy containing anthracyclines, and may be safely administered on an outpatient basis.

A phase I and pharmacokinetic study of liposomal vinorelbine in patients with advanced solid tumor

PURPOSE

This phase I study was performed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of an untargeted liposomal formulation of vinorelbine (NanoVNB®) and to characterize its plasma pharmacokinetics in patients with advanced solid tumors which were refractory to conventional treatment or without an effective treatment.

PATIENTS & METHODS

The study incorporated an accelerated titration design. Twenty-two patients with various solid tumors were enrolled. NanoVNB(®) was administered intravenously at doses of 2.2-23 mg/m(2) once every 14 days. Pharmacokinetic endpoints were evaluated in the first cycle. The safety profiles and anti-tumor effects of NanoVNB® were also determined.

RESULTS

Skin rash was the DLT and the most common non-hematological toxicity. The MTD was 18.5 mg/m(2). Drug-related grade 3-4 hematological toxicities were infrequent. Compared with intravenous free vinorelbine, NanoVNB® showed a high C(max) and low plasma clearance. Of the 11 patients completing at least 1 post-treatment tumor assessment, 5 had stable disease. No responders were noted.

CONCLUSION

NanoVNB® was well tolerated and exhibited more favorable pharmacokinetic profiles than free vinorelbine. Based on dose-limiting skin toxicity, further evaluation of NanoVNB® starting from 18.5 mg/m(2) as a single agent or in combination with other chemotherapeutic agents for vinorelbine-active malignancies is warranted.

Randomized phase II study of cisplatin and 5-FU continuous infusion (PF) versus cisplatin, UFT and vinorelbine (UFTVP) as induction chemotherapy in locally advanced squamous cell head and neck cancer (LA-SCHNC)

OBJECTIVES

We conducted a multicentric randomized phase II trial comparing 5-FU continuous infusion (PF) and cisplatin, UFT and vinorelbine (UFTVP) as induction chemotherapy (IC) in locally advanced squamous cell head and neck cancer (LA-SCHNC). Primary objective was complete response (CR) to IC and overall survival (OS) was a secondary objective.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

PF: cisplatin 100 mg/m(2) i.v. Day 1 (D1) and 5-FU 1,000 mg/m(2) per day i.v. continous infusion D1-D5, every 21 days. UFTVP: cisplatin 100 mg/m(2) i.v. D1; UFT 200 mg/m(2) per day p.o. D1-D21 and vinorelbine 25 mg/m(2) i.v. D1 and D8, every 21 days. Four IC courses were planned in both arms.

RESULTS

A total of 206 patients (pts) were included (PF/UFTVP: 99/107): oral cavity: 8%/10%, oropharynx: 20%/25%, hypopharynx: 17%/14%, larynx: 54%/50%. Stage (TNM, 2002): III: 41%/35%, IVA: 23%/27%, IVB: 35%/38%. Complete response to IC: PF:36%/UFTVP:31% (P: no significative (NS)). G 3-4 toxicity (PF/UFTVP): neutropenia: 52%/72%; febrile neutropenia: 3%/20% (P < 0.001); anaemia:1%/14% (P < 0.001); trombocytopenia: 5%/0% (P = 0.02); mucositis: 15%/7% (P < 0.001). Deaths during IC: 2(2%)/3(3%). IC with UFTVP was associated with a favourable OS in the Cox analysis (actuarial 5 year OS: 49% vs. 34%; HR: 0.67, 95% CI: 0.47-0.95, P: 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Although clinical response is equal in both arms, overall survival (Cox) is better in the UFTVP arm. Febrile neutropenia and anaemia were more frequent with UFTVP while mucositis and trombocytopenia were more severe with PF.

A phase II study using vinorelbine and continuous 5-fluorouracil in patients with advanced head and neck cancer

Seventy patients with advanced head and neck cancer were treated with vinorelbine and continuous 5-FU administered in a central venous catheter. Over all response was 36% with 9% complete responses. The most common grade 3 and 4 toxicities were stomatitis (13), infection (5), pain related to vinorelbine infusion (4), skin toxicity (3). Thirty one patients had grade 3 or 4 leukopenia. Treatment was complicated by venous thrombosis in the central venous catheter in one case. A majority of patients experienced dose reduction of one or both drugs or treatment delays due to toxicity. Median time to progression was 4.7 months and overall median survival 6.6 months. We conclude that the regimen is feasible and tolerated with moderate toxicity. Response rates and time to progression are comparable to other studies with multi agent treatment.

Long-Term Results of a Phase II Trial of Induction Chemotherapy with Uracil-Ftegafur (UFT), Vinorelbine, and Cisplatin (UFTVP) followed by Radiotherapy Concomitant with UFT and Carboplatin (RT/UFTJ) in a Primary Site Preservation Setting for Resectable Locally Advanced Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Larynx and Hypopharynx

OBJECTIVE

We present long-term results of a phase II trial of induction chemotherapy (IC) with uracilftegafur (UFT) 200 mg/m orally days 1 to 21, vinorelbine 25 mg/m intravenously (IV) days 1 and 8, and cisplatin 100 mg/m IV day 1 (UFTVP) each for 21 days for 4 courses, followed by radiotherapy concomitant with UFT 100 mg/m orally daily and carboplatin (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.5 IV weekly) (RT/ UFTJ), without surgery to the primary site if response, in patients (pts) with resectable locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the larynx and hypopharynx. The primary endpoint was clinical complete response (CR) to induction UFTVP, and secondary endpoints were long-term overall survival (OS) and survival with primary site preservation (SPP).

RESULTS

Between 1994 and 1997, 37 pts were included. CR to IC was 54% (95% confidence interval [CI] 43-65%). Main toxicity of UFTVP was G 3,4 neutropenia (73% of pts, 16% developed febrile neutropenia). After IC, primary site was treated with RT in 29 pts: 20 of them received RT/UFTJ (main toxicity mucositis G 3,4 70%). No pt died during treatment. Actuarial 5-year OS and SPP were 57% and 37%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

This approach has significant activity and acceptable toxicity for achieving promising long-term OS and SPP and deserves further investigation.

Quimioterapia de inducción con vinorelbine cisplatino y uft en carcinomas avanzados faringolaríngeos: resultados de un estudio fase II

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the results of an induction chemotherapy protocol with Vinorelbine, UFT and Cisplatin (UFTVP).

METHODS

93 patients with laryngo-pharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma in stage III or IV were prospectively entered into a protocol to receive four cycles of UFTVP. Responders followed definitive radiation therapy. Nonresponders underwent conventional surgery with postoperative radiation.

RESULTS

Following chemotherapy nodal response (complete in 28% and partial in 33%) was less than that the primary site (complete in 60% and partial in 30%), p = 0.002. With a median follow-up of 62 months, the Kaplan-Meier 5-year survival was 45%. Successful larynx preservation was achieved in 50% of patients with laryngeal cancer and in 29% of patients with hypopharyngeal cancer. Lymph node metastases and pharyngeal localization were found to be significant negative factors with regards to survival.

CONCLUSIONS

UFTVP is an active regime of chemotherapy in advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the pharynx and larynx. Results differ according to the localization, having significantly better rates of survival and organ preservation in the laryngeal cancers that in those of the pharynx.

Activity of vinorelbine in gastrointestinal cancers

Vinorelbine (VNR) is a semi-synthetic vinca alkaloid (5'nor-anhydro-vinblastine) that differs from other vinca alkaloids by a modification of the catharantine moiety of the molecule. VNR binds to tubulin and inhibits tubulin assembly and microtubule formation. It has less activity than other vinca alkaloids against axonal microtubules and this may account for its reduced neurotoxicity in clinical use. In gastrointestinal tumours, VNR did not show significant activity in advanced pancreatic adenocarcinomas. Two phase II studies in metastatic colorectal cancer resulted in conflicting results: no activity in first-line therapy on lung metastases, but encouraging results in 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-resistant metastases. Conversely, significant antitumoural effect in oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma has been demonstrated. The first study was performed in 46 patients with metastatic disease. Six of 30 patients (20%) without prior chemotherapy achieved a partial response (95% confidence interval (CI), 8-39%). One of 16 (6%) with prior chemotherapy responded. Grade (gr) 3 or 4 granulocytopaenia occurred in 59% of patients and peripheral neurotoxicity was minor (26% gr 1). These results were confirmed by another group. A phase I study was performed using VNR and concurrent radiation (64 Gy) in previously untreated patients with inoperable locally advanced oesophageal cancer ineligible for cisplatin-5-FU-based chemoradiation. Twenty-four patients entered the study. The maximal tolerated dose has been reached at 25 mg/m(2)/week, the dose-limiting toxicities being febrile neutropaenia and infection. Major objective tumour response was observed at each dose level except the first one. Recruitment is ongoing to confirm the recommended dose of VNR (20 mg/m(2)/week). A phase II study of a VNR-cisplatin combination in metastatic oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma was recently completed. Seventy-one eligible patients were included. Main toxicities were haematological (gr 3-4 granulocytopaenia, 41%), infection, vomiting and fatigue. The response rate was 37% (95% CI, 26-49%) with a median duration of response of 7.7 months. This 2-day regimen appears at least as active and less toxic than the standard 5-day 5-FU and cisplatin regimen.

Cisplatin and vinorelbine in advanced and/or metastatic adenocarcinoma of the endometrium: a new highly active chemotherapeutic regimen

PURPOSE

To date the systemic treatment of recurrent and/or metastatic adenocarcinoma of the endometrium (EAC), using both chemotherapy and hormonotherapy (HT), is far from satisfactory. The significant activity of vinorelbine (VNR), a relatively new semisynthetic vinca alkaloid, demonstrated in advanced breast cancer, bronchial adenocarcinoma, and in head and neck cancer, prompted us to carry out a phase II trial employing the combination of cisplatin and VNR in a pluri-institutional series of patients with recurrent and/or metastatic EAC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirty-five patients affected by recurrent and/or metastatic EAC have been treated with CDDP 80 mg/m2 on day 1 plus VNR 25 mg/m2 i.v. bolus on days 1 + 8. This cycle was repeated every 21 days. After three cycles patients were restaged for objective response. Analysis of response rate and duration, overall survival, and toxicity pattern were the main aims of the study.

RESULTS

Twenty out of thirty-five patients achieved a major objective response for an overall response rate of 57% (95% confidence limits (CL): 39%-74%). Four patients had a complete response (11%; 95% CL: 3%-27%) with a median progression-free survival (PFS) of eight hundred fourteen days, while sixteen patients had a partial response (46%; 95% CL: 29%-63%) with a median PFS of one hundred eighty-four days. Six patients had stable disease and nine progressed. All patients who achieved a clinical complete response had only a single site of disease at entry, but no association was noted between number of involved sites and likehood of achieving PR. Median overall survival was 240 days, while that of patients with complete and partial response was 855 and 300 days, respectively. Treatment was quite well tolerated with few cases of grade 3-4 myelosuppression. Alopecia was virtually absent and neurotoxicity was mild. One patient complained of an acute pain syndrome at the tumor site.

CONCLUSIONS

The CDDP + VNR regimen is quite active against recurrent and/or metastatic endometrial adenocarcinoma, at least in terms of objective response rate which is among the highest ever reported in medical literature. However. duration of objective response and median overall survival are in the disappointing range reported for other regimens. In our opinion the CDDP plus VNR regimen is good enough to be compared to the anthracycline-based regimens and may represent the basis for future development of newer active polychemotherapeutic schedules.

A phase II study of docetaxel in patients with metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck

This study was designed to evaluate the activity, safety and tolerance of docetaxel (D) in a selected population with metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). Twenty-four patients with no prior palliative therapy were enrolled and received D 100 mg m(-2) by 1 h of infusion, every 3 weeks. All but two patients had been evaluated for efficacy on lung metastatic sites. No prophylactic administration of anti-emetics or growth factors was given. A pharmacokinetic study was performed in 22 patients. Twenty-one patients were assessable for response and 24 for toxicity. One hundred and four cycles were administered with a median of 4.5 (range 1-9) per patient. The median cumulative dose was 449 mg m(-2). Partial responses were achieved in five patients with a median duration of 18.7 weeks (range 13.1-50.3). The overall response rate was 20.8% with a median duration of 11.0 weeks (range 2.4-52.6). The most frequent side-effect was neutropenia (79.2% grade IV) but with a short duration (median 4 days) and no febrile neutropenia. The incidence of moderate/severe fluid retention was 29.2% with one treatment discontinuation. Other toxicities (all grades) were common (skin 75%, asthenia 50%, infection 29.2%, nausea 16.7%, diarrhoea 12.5%, stomatitis 16.7%, vomiting 8.3% and HSR 8.3%). A mean clearance of 19.6 l h(-1) m(-2) and an area under the curve of 6.00 microg ml(-1) h(-1) was found in the pharmacokinetic analysis. Docetaxel is active in this selected population with metastatic SCCHN, with a good tolerance.

An EORTC-ECSG phase II study of vinorelbine in patients with recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck

BACKGROUND

Vinorelbine is an active drug in the treatment of lung and breast cancers and has a favorable toxicity profile. Many clinical trials have demonstrated its antitumor activity in other tumor types including squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). We investigated the efficacy and tolerability of vinorelbine in patients with recurrent and/or metastatic SCCHN, previously untreated by chemotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Seventy-one patients with locoregional recurrent and/or metastatic SCCHN were treated with vinorelbine at a dose of 30 mg/m2/week i.v. by short-duration infusion on an out-patient basis. Doses were adjusted according to tolerance.

RESULTS

Two complete and seven partial responses were observed among 56 evaluable patients, yielding a response rate of 16% (95% confidence interval (CI): 8%-28%). The overall response rate of all eligible patients (63) was 14%. The responses were seen in recurrent tumors, lymph nodes and in lung metastases, and their median duration was 19 weeks (12-63). The main toxicity, severe and reversible neutropenia (grade 3-4) occurred in 53% of the 69 evaluable (for toxicity) patients. Twelve patients developed severe bronchopulmonary infections, which caused two early deaths. Constipation was observed in 31 patients (45%). Other gastrointestinal toxicities, asthenia, acute pain syndrome and peripheral sensory neuropathy, were mild to moderate. The median number of treatments was seven cycles and the median relative dose intensity of vinorelbine was 85% (25.5 mg/m2/week).

CONCLUSIONS

Vinorelbine is an active drug, with acceptable toxicity, in recurrent and/or metastatic SCCHN, at the dose and schedule administered in the present study. Further evaluation in association with other agents and/or radiotherapy is warranted.

A phase II trial of vinorelbine in patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck

Forty patients with locally advanced, recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) were treated weekly with vinorelbine 30 mg/m2. Thirty-five patients received prior surgery, 20 prior chemotherapy, and 38 prior radiation therapy. Five patients were not evaluable for response and were assumed to be nonresponders. There were three confirmed responders (one complete response, two partial responses) for a response rate of 7.5% (95% confidence interval, 1.6%-20.4%). The median survival time for all patients was 5 months (range, 0.5-50 months), the median progression-free survival time was 2 months (range, 1-49 months). The most common toxicity was myelosuppression, with 60% of patients experiencing grade 3 or higher leukopenia. There was one treatment-related death resulting from sepsis. Vinorelbine has minimal activity in patients with SCCHN that does not exceed that of other currently used agents.

Vinorelbine, bleomycin and methotrexate as a salvage therapy for patients with head and neck squamous carcinoma in relapse after cisplatin/fluorouracil

BACKGROUND

Cisplatin (CDDP) and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) represent the standard chemotherapy for advanced/recurrent head and neck squamous carcinoma (HNSC); however, the duration of response is often short, with a median survival of only five to six months.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with HNSC were treated with vinorelbine 20 mg/m2 and methotrexate 50 mg/m2 every week and bleomycin 15 mg/m2 every two weeks. All patients were previously treated with a CDDP/5-FU regimen.

RESULTS

Forty-eight patients were evaluable for response and toxicity. After a median follow-up of 15 months, 16 patients are still alive and 32 have died. We had one complete response (2%), 12 partial responses (25%) (overall response rate 27%; 95% CI: 14%-39%), 11 stabilizations (23%) and 24 progressions (50%) of disease. Neutropenia grade 3-4 was seen in 12 patients; peripheral neurotoxicity in two patients. There were no toxic deaths.

CONCLUSIONS

This regimen, administered in an outpatient setting, revealed some activity as a second-line treatment in patients with HNSC, with acceptable toxicity.

Vinorelbine (Navelbine): a third-generation vinca alkaloid

The vinca alkaloids represent one of the oldest classes of antineoplastic agents used in humans with a wide spectrum of activity against both animal and human tumors. These agents are known to inhibit microtubule polymerization. Vinorelbine is a semisynthetic analog that reached clinical trial on the basis of less preclinical evidence of toxicity to neuronal tissue and greater cytotoxic activity in preclinical models than the older compounds of this class. In humans, the clearance of this agent shows a wide variation among subjects with the predominant toxicity being hematological. Significant antitumor activity has been observed in diseases that previously have been shown to respond to vinca alkaloids.

Vinorelbine, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil as initial treatment for previously untreated, unresectable squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: results of a phase II multicenter study

BACKGROUND

The combination of vinorelbine (VNR), cisplatin (CDDP), and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) has previously been shown to be active in recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCHNC). This multicenter Phase II study was carried out with the aim of evaluating the effectiveness of this combination in patients with previously untreated, unresectable locally advanced SCHNC.

METHODS

Sixty patients with previously untreated, unresectable SCHNC were treated with CDDP 80 mg/m2 on Days 1, 5-FU 600 mg/m2 as a 4-hour infusion on Days 2-5, and VNR 25 mg/m2 i.v. bolus on Days 2 and 8. There were 15 patients with laryngeal carcinoma, 19 patients with oropharyngeal carcinoma, 15 with carcinoma in the oral cavity, 5 with carcinoma in the hypopharynx, and 4 with carcinoma in the maxillary sinus. Most patients (78%) had Stage IV disease. After achievement of the best possible objective response, patients were subjected to definitive locoregional treatment, i.e., radiotherapy and/or surgery, as appropriate.

RESULTS

All patients completed the induction chemotherapy. After a mean of 3.86 cycles per patient, the overall response rate was 88% (95% confidence interval [CI], 82-94%), with a complete response rate of 23% (95% CI, 14-26%). Complete responses were more frequently seen in patients with N0-1 disease than in those with N2-3 disease (P = 0.037). No other statistically significant correlation between type of response and extent of disease was noted. Toxicity consisted mainly of myelosuppression and gastrointestinal side effects. After definitive locoregional treatment, 58% of patients were clinically free of disease. These patients included those who had complete response after induction chemotherapy, 19 of 39 patients who had partial response, and 2 with stable disease. Median disease free survival was 16 months, and median overall survival was 23 months.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination regimen of CDDP, 5-FU, and VNR was very active in previously untreated SCHNC. It was well tolerated in most cases, and neurotoxicity was not a major side effect. This regimen, which does not require hospitalization, should be compared with standard chemotherapy, such as the combination of CDDP and continuous-infusion 5-FU.

Chemotherapy of squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck: the future is now

In 1996, there is an established role for chemotherapy in head and neck cancer. Patients with recurrent disease will be offered combination chemotherapy. In this setting, investigations of new drugs or combinations and the pursuit of concomitant chemo-reirradiation are of interest. In patients with locoregionally advanced disease, induction chemotherapy can be used with the goal of larynx preservation. In addition, a role for chemotherapy in nasopharyngeal cancer appears to be emerging with increased survival as therapeutic goal. The combination of cisplatin and 5-FU does not need to be tested further, however, a more definitive evaluation of a biochemically modulated PF regimen might be of interest. Furthermore, induction chemotherapy represents an ideal investigational tool in which to further evaluate the activity of several new drugs in head and neck cancer patients. Finally, concomitant chemoradiotherapy has resulted in increased survival in several randomized clinical studies. Given the poor outcome of standard radiotherapy in patients with unresectable disease, we favor the administration of concomitant chemoradiotherapy in this group of patients as a standard therapy. In our opinion, the use of radiation therapy alone in this group of patients should be restricted to patients with poor performance status or other high medical risks that render the administration of chemotherapy unadvisable. Finally, given the high incidence of second malignancies and general medical complications in cured head and neck cancer patients, studies of chemoprevention and good preventive medical care by a medical oncologist should be made available to all patients.

Neo-adjuvant chemotherapy +/- immunotherapy with s.c. IL 2 in advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: a pilot study

We carried out a pilot nonrandomized phase II study to compare the neo-adjuvant chemotherapic regimen with cisplatin, 5-FU and vinorelbine with the same combination plus s.c. IL 2 in advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). The primary goals of the trial were to evaluate the feasibility and response rates of the two regimens. The study design consisted of a patient's assignment to either of the two following arms: Arm A: Cisplatin 80 mg/m2 i.v. on day 1; 5-FU 600 mg/m2 i.v. on days 2-5; and vinorelbine 20 mg/m2 i.v. on days 2 and 8, Arm B: the same chemotherapic regimen plus recombinant IL 2 (Proleukin, Eurocetus) 9 MIU s.c. daily from day 9 to 13 and from day 16 to 20 for every cycle. From March 1993 to November 1993 twenty three patients with Stage III-IV HNSCC were enrolled in the study. Patients could be evaluated for response to treatment if they had received at least 2 complete cycles of therapy. The overall response rate (ORR) was 63% in Arm A and 100% in Arm B. The differences for ORR and CR rates were statistically significant in favor of Arm B. The analysis for each of the three drugs included in the chemotherapy schedule shows that both the actually received average dose-intensity and the actually delivered average cumulative doses/patient were higher for Arm B (chemo-plus IL 2 therapy) (approximately 80% of programmed dose-intensity) than for Arm A (approximately 70% of programmed dose-intensity). Both the actually received average dose-intensity and the actually delivered average cumulative doses/patient for IL 2 were more than 80%. In both arms the most frequent side effects were myelosuppression, phlebitis and electrolyte disturbances. There were 2 toxic deaths, 1 in Arm A and 1 in Arm B, both for hematologic toxicity. Our "pilot" study suggests that the combination of cisplatin, 5-FU, vinorelbine plus IL 2 is a highly active, but rather toxic, neo-adjuvant treatment in advanced HNSCC with very high ORR and CR rates.

Vinorelbine in pre-treated advanced head & neck squamous cell carcinoma. A phase II study

BACKGROUND

There are few moderately active single-agents for the treatment of recurrent or metastatic head & neck cancer. Thus, the identification of novel active agents is warranted. We performed the present phase II trial to evaluate activity and toxicity of vinorelbine (VNB) in previously treated patients with advanced head & neck cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

16 patients entered the study, 15 of whom were evaluable. The main characteristics were: M/F = 14/1; median age of 58 yrs (18-67); median PS (Karnofsky score) of 70 (60-100); primitive tumor sites were: oropharynx in 5; larynx in 4, hypopharynx in 3, rhynopharynx in 2, and oral cavity in 1 patient; initial clinical stage was IV in 9, III in 4 and II in 2 patients. Previous treatments were: cisplatinum with concurrent radiotherapy in 6 and cisplatinum + fluorouracil (for at least 2 cycles) in 9 patients. VNB was given at the dose of 20 mg/m2 i.v. infusion for 1 hr, weekly, for a minimum of 8 doses. Response and toxicity were evaluated after at least 8 doses of VNB.

RESULTS

Overall, 139 courses of VNB were given (median 9, range 8-19). Objective responses were: partial response in 1 patient (6%); stable disease, lasting at least 2 months, in 4 patients (27%) and progression in the other 10 patients (67%). Three patients had a one week delay in subsequent courses due to severe hematological toxicity. Toxicities observed were: leucopenia of grade IV (W.H.O.) in 2 patients and of grade I-II in 12 patients; granulocytopenia of grade III in 1 patient and of grade IV in 2 patients; grade I-II anemia in 4 patients; grade II phlebitis in 3 patients; grade II constipation in 2 patients, grade I-II peripheral neuropathy in 3 patients, grade I-II nausea and vomiting in 4 patients, and grade II stomatitis in 2 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

VNB, in this series of heavily pre-treated patients with head & neck cancer, did not reveal an antitumor activity of interest.