1
|
Wang Y, Wang W, Zhang S, Cai W, Song R, Mei T, Wang W, Zhang F, Qi F, Zhang S, Liu Y, Li H, Ji P, Gao M, Song H, Yao H, Meng F, Lu Z, Wang J, Liu L. Diagnostic value of carbohydrate antigen 50 in biliary tract cancer: A large-scale multicenter study. Cancer Med 2024; 13:e7388. [PMID: 38924330 PMCID: PMC11200271 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.7388] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2024] [Revised: 05/27/2024] [Accepted: 06/02/2024] [Indexed: 06/28/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To date, carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) have been widely used for the screening, diagnosis and prediction of biliary tract cancer (BTC) patients. However, few studies with large sample sizes of carbohydrate antigen 50 (CA50) were reported in BTC patients. METHODS A total of 1121 patients from the Liver Cancer Clin-Bio Databank of Anhui Hepatobiliary Surgery Union between January 2017 and December 2022 were included in this study (673 in the training cohort and 448 in the validation cohort): among them, 458 with BTC, 178 with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), 23 with combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma, and 462 with nontumor patients. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and decision curve analysis (DCA) were used to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy and clinical usefulness. RESULTS ROC curves obtained by combining CA50, CA19-9, and AFP showed that the AUC value of the diagnostic MODEL 1 was 0.885 (95% CI 0.856-0.885, specificity 70.3%, and sensitivity 84.0%) in the training cohort and 0.879 (0.841-0.917, 76.7%, and 84.3%) in the validation cohort. In addition, comparing iCCA and HCC (235 in the training cohort, 157 in the validation cohort), the AUC values of the diagnostic MODEL 2 were 0.893 (95% CI 0.853-0.933, specificity 96%, and sensitivity 68.6%) in the training cohort and 0.872 (95% CI 0.818-0.927, 94.2%, and 64.6%) in the validation cohort. CONCLUSION The model combining CA50, CA19-9, and AFP not only has good diagnostic value for BTC but also has good diagnostic value for distinguishing iCCA and HCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yong‐Shuai Wang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Centre for Leading Medicine and Advanced Technologies of IHM, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and MedicineUniversity of Science and Technology of ChinaHefeiAnhuiChina
| | - Wei Wang
- Department of Medical Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and MedicineUniversity of Science and Technology of ChinaHefeiAnhuiChina
| | - Shen‐Yu Zhang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Centre for Leading Medicine and Advanced Technologies of IHM, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and MedicineUniversity of Science and Technology of ChinaHefeiAnhuiChina
| | - Wei Cai
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Centre for Leading Medicine and Advanced Technologies of IHM, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and MedicineUniversity of Science and Technology of ChinaHefeiAnhuiChina
| | - Rui‐Peng Song
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Centre for Leading Medicine and Advanced Technologies of IHM, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and MedicineUniversity of Science and Technology of ChinaHefeiAnhuiChina
| | - Tao Mei
- Department of Physical Examination Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and MedicineUniversity of Science and Technology of ChinaHefeiAnhuiChina
| | - Wei Wang
- Department of Pathology, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and MedicineUniversity of Science and Technology of ChinaHefeiAnhuiChina
| | - Feng Zhang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Centre for Leading Medicine and Advanced Technologies of IHM, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and MedicineUniversity of Science and Technology of ChinaHefeiAnhuiChina
| | - Fei‐Yu Qi
- Department of Hepatobiliary SurgeryThe First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical UniversityBengbuAnhuiChina
| | - Sai Zhang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Centre for Leading Medicine and Advanced Technologies of IHM, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and MedicineUniversity of Science and Technology of ChinaHefeiAnhuiChina
| | - Yan Liu
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Centre for Leading Medicine and Advanced Technologies of IHM, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and MedicineUniversity of Science and Technology of ChinaHefeiAnhuiChina
| | - Hao‐Ran Li
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Centre for Leading Medicine and Advanced Technologies of IHM, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and MedicineUniversity of Science and Technology of ChinaHefeiAnhuiChina
| | - Peng Ji
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Centre for Leading Medicine and Advanced Technologies of IHM, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and MedicineUniversity of Science and Technology of ChinaHefeiAnhuiChina
| | - Miao Gao
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Centre for Leading Medicine and Advanced Technologies of IHM, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and MedicineUniversity of Science and Technology of ChinaHefeiAnhuiChina
| | - Hua‐Chuan Song
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Centre for Leading Medicine and Advanced Technologies of IHM, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and MedicineUniversity of Science and Technology of ChinaHefeiAnhuiChina
| | - Huan‐Zhang Yao
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Centre for Leading Medicine and Advanced Technologies of IHM, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and MedicineUniversity of Science and Technology of ChinaHefeiAnhuiChina
| | - Fan‐Zheng Meng
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Centre for Leading Medicine and Advanced Technologies of IHM, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and MedicineUniversity of Science and Technology of ChinaHefeiAnhuiChina
| | - Zheng Lu
- Department of Hepatobiliary SurgeryThe First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical UniversityBengbuAnhuiChina
| | - Ji‐Zhou Wang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Centre for Leading Medicine and Advanced Technologies of IHM, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and MedicineUniversity of Science and Technology of ChinaHefeiAnhuiChina
- Anhui Province Key Laboratory of Hepatopancreatobiliary SurgeryHefeiAnhuiChina
- Anhui Provincial Clinical Research Center for Hepatobiliary DiseasesHefeiAnhuiChina
| | - Lian‐Xin Liu
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Centre for Leading Medicine and Advanced Technologies of IHM, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and MedicineUniversity of Science and Technology of ChinaHefeiAnhuiChina
- Anhui Province Key Laboratory of Hepatopancreatobiliary SurgeryHefeiAnhuiChina
- Anhui Provincial Clinical Research Center for Hepatobiliary DiseasesHefeiAnhuiChina
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Cui J, Jiao F, Li Q, Wang Z, Fu D, Liang J, Liang H, Xia T, Zhang T, Zhang Y, Dai G, Zhang Z, Wang J, Bai Y, Bai Y, Bi F, Chen D, Cao D, Chen J, Fang W, Gao Y, Guo J, Hao J, Hua H, Huang X, Liu W, Liu X, Li D, Li J, Li E, Li Z, Pan H, Shen L, Sun Y, Tao M, Wang C, Wang F, Xiong J, Zhang T, Zhang X, Zhan X, Zheng L, Ren G, Zhang T, Zhou J, Ma Q, Qin S, Hao C, Wang L. Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology (CSCO): Clinical guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of pancreatic cancer. JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER CENTER 2022; 2:205-215. [PMID: 39036552 PMCID: PMC11256594 DOI: 10.1016/j.jncc.2022.08.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2022] [Revised: 07/30/2022] [Accepted: 08/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic cancer is one of the leading causes of cancer-related mortality in both developed and developing countries. The incidence of pancreatic cancer in China accounts for about a quater of the global incidence, and the epidemiological characteristics and therapeutic strategies differ due to social, economic, cultural, environmental, and public health factors. Non-domestic guidelines do not reflect the clinicopathologic characteristics and treatment patterns of Chinese patients. Thus, in 2018, the Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology (CSCO) organized a panel of senior experts from all sub-specialties within the field of pancreatic oncology to compile the Chinese guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of pancreatic cancer. The guidelines were made based on both the Western and Eastern clinical evidence and updated every one or two years. The experts made consensus judgments and classified evidence-based recommendations into various grades according to the regional differences, the accessibility of diagnostic and treatment resources, and health economic indexes in China. Here we present the latest version of the guidelines, which covers the diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of pancreatic cancer. The guidelines might standardize the diagnosis and treatment of pancreatic cancer in China and will encourage oncologists to design and conduct more clinical trials about pancreatic cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiujie Cui
- Department of Medical Oncology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Feng Jiao
- Department of Medical Oncology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Qi Li
- Department of Medical Oncology, Shanghai General Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Zheng Wang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China
| | - Deliang Fu
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Huashan Hospital, Pancreatic Disease Institute, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Jun Liang
- Department of Oncology, Peking University International Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Houjie Liang
- Department of Oncology and Southwest Cancer Center, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Tingyi Xia
- Beijing Huaxia Jingfang Cancer Radiotherapy Center, Former Air Force General Hospital and PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Tao Zhang
- Cancer Center, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Yang Zhang
- Department of Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China
| | - Guanghai Dai
- Department of Oncology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Zhihong Zhang
- Department of Pathology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Jian Wang
- Department of Imaging, Changzheng Hospital, Naval Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yongrui Bai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yuxian Bai
- Oncology Department of Internal Medicine, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, China
| | - Feng Bi
- Department of Medical Oncology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Donghui Chen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Shanghai General Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Dan Cao
- Department of Medical Oncology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Jie Chen
- Department of Pathology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Weijia Fang
- Department of Medical Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Yong Gao
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai East Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
| | - Jianwei Guo
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
| | - Jihui Hao
- Department of Pancreatic Cancer, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Haiqing Hua
- Department of Medical Oncology, Eastern Theater Command General Hospital, Qinhuai Medical District, Nanjing, China
| | - Xinyu Huang
- Department of General Surgery, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital, Shanghai, China
| | - Wenchao Liu
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Xijing Hospital, Air Force Medical University, Xian, China
| | - Xiufeng Liu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Eastern Theater Command General Hospital, Qinhuai Medical District, Nanjing, China
| | - Da Li
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University, School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Ji Li
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Huashan Hospital, Pancreatic Disease Institute, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Enxiao Li
- Department of Medical Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China
| | - Zhiwei Li
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, China
| | - Hongming Pan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University, School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Lin Shen
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Yongwei Sun
- Department of Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine Affiliated Renji Hospital, Shanghai, China
| | - Min Tao
- Department of Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China
| | - Chengfeng Wang
- State Key Lab of Molecular Oncology & Department of Pancreatic and Gastric Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Fenghua Wang
- Department of Medical Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jianping Xiong
- Department of Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China
| | - Taiping Zhang
- Department of General Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Xuebin Zhang
- Department of Interventional Oncology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Xianbao Zhan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Changhai Hospital of Shanghai, Navy Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Leizhen Zheng
- Department of Oncology, Xin Hua Hospital Affiliated To Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Gang Ren
- Peking University Shougang Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Tingting Zhang
- Oncology Department of Internal Medicine, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, China
| | - Jun Zhou
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Qingyong Ma
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China
| | - Shukui Qin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Eastern Theater Command General Hospital, Qinhuai Medical District, Nanjing, China
| | - Chunyi Hao
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Peking University Cancer Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Liwei Wang
- Department of Medical Oncology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wu HY, Wei Y, Liu LM, Chen ZB, Hu QP, Pan SL. Construction of a model to predict the prognosis of patients with cholangiocarcinoma using alternative splicing events. Oncol Lett 2019; 18:4677-4690. [PMID: 31611977 PMCID: PMC6781777 DOI: 10.3892/ol.2019.10838] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2019] [Accepted: 08/13/2019] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is a type of malignant tumor that originates in the mucosal epithelial cells of the biliary system. It is a highly aggressive cancer that progresses rapidly, has low surgical resection rates and a high recurrence. At present, no prognostic molecular biomarker for CCA has been identified. However, CCA progression is affected by mRNA precursors that modify gene expression levels and protein structures through alternative splicing (AS) events, which create molecular indicators that may potentially be used to predict CCA outcomes. The present study aimed to construct a model to predict CCA prognosis based on AS events. Using prognostic data available from The Cancer Genome Atlas, including the percent spliced index of AS events obtained from TCGASpliceSeq in 32 CCA cases, univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed to assess the associations between AS events and the overall survival (OS) rates of patients with CCA. Additional multivariate Cox regression analyses were used to identify AS events that were significantly associated with prognosis, which were used to construct a prediction model with a prognostic index (PI). A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to determine the predictive value of the PI, and Pearson's correlation analysis was used to determine the association between OS-related AS events and splicing factors. A total of 38,804 AS events were identified in 9,673 CCA genes, among which univariate Cox regression analysis identified 1,639 AS events associated with OS (P<0.05); multivariate Cox regression analysis narrowed this list to 23 CCA AS events (P<0.001). The final PI model was constructed to predict the survival of patients with CCA; the ROC curve demonstrated that it had a high predictive power for CCA prognosis, with a highest area under the curve of 0.986. Correlations between 23 OS-related AS events and splicing factors were also noted, and may thus, these AS events may be used to improve predictions of OS. In conclusion, AS events exhibited potential for predicting the prognosis of patients with CCA, and thus, the effects of AS events in CCA required further examination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hua-Yu Wu
- Department of Pathophysiology, School of Pre-Clinical Medicine, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi 530021, P.R. China.,Department of Cell Biology and Genetics, School of Pre-Clinical Medicine, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi 530021, P.R. China
| | - Yi Wei
- Department of Pathophysiology, School of Pre-Clinical Medicine, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi 530021, P.R. China
| | - Li-Min Liu
- Department of Toxicology, College of Pharmacy, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi 530021, P.R. China
| | - Zhong-Biao Chen
- Department of General Surgery, The First People's Hospital of Yulin, Yulin, Guangxi 537000, P.R. China
| | - Qi-Ping Hu
- Department of Cell Biology and Genetics, School of Pre-Clinical Medicine, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi 530021, P.R. China
| | - Shang-Ling Pan
- Department of Pathophysiology, School of Pre-Clinical Medicine, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi 530021, P.R. China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Shan M, Tian Q, Zhang L. Serum CA50 levels in patients with cancers and other diseases. PROGRESS IN MOLECULAR BIOLOGY AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE 2019; 162:187-198. [PMID: 30905449 DOI: 10.1016/bs.pmbts.2018.12.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Carbohydrate antigen 50 (CA50) is initially reported as a cancer-specific antigen expressed on the surface of human colorectal Colo-205 cancer cells. Subsequently, increased serum CA50 levels are observed in patients not only with colorectal cancers but also other types of cancers. Eventually, serum CA50 is measured clinically as a cancer biomarker. However, serum CA50 level does not always increase in cancer patients but does increase in patients suffering from nonneoplasm diseases, which indicates that serum CA50 is not produced by cancer cells exclusively. Therefore, the serum CA50 levels in patients suffering different types of diseases should be systematically compared in order to comprehend the molecular nature of serum CA50 as a biomarker. In our current study, we measured and analyzed serum CA50 levels from 2113 patients with 14 clinically defined diseases with at least 30 independent tests for each disease in addition to 13,997 serum samples from individuals who attend their annual physical examination as healthy controls. Based on the mean, median, and -Log10p values, we found that patients suffering from pancreatic cancer, cirrhosis, pancreatitis, lung cancer, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and colon cancer had highest levels of serum CA50 while patients suffering from coronary heart disease, gastric cancer, and rectum cancer showed comparable serum CA50 levels to that of healthy controls. Moreover, patients with osteoporosis, anemia, or gastritis had lower serum CA50 levels than that of healthy controls. Furthermore, healthy individuals older than 65 years old had increased serum CA50 levels compared with that of healthy controls. Taken together, these data suggest that serum CA50 is likely to be a system malfunction biomarker, and the serum CA50 levels could be used as diagnostic biomarkers not only for cancers but also for other nonneoplasm diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ming Shan
- Systems Biology and Medicine Center for Complex Diseases, Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
| | - Qingwu Tian
- Clinical Laboratory, Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China
| | - Lijuan Zhang
- Systems Biology and Medicine Center for Complex Diseases, Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Wang CJ, Xu RH, Yuan QY, Wang YK, Shen DW, Wang XJ, Gao W, Zhang H, Jiang H. Bioinformatics Method to Analyze the Mechanism of Pancreatic Cancer Disorder. J Comput Biol 2013; 20:444-52. [PMID: 23614574 DOI: 10.1089/cmb.2012.0281] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Cong-Jun Wang
- Biliary and Pancreatic Department, Shanghai East Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Rong-Hua Xu
- Department of Oncology Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical College, Haikou, Hainan Province, China
| | - Qiong-Ying Yuan
- Biliary and Pancreatic Department, Shanghai East Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Yong-Kun Wang
- Biliary and Pancreatic Department, Shanghai East Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Dong-Wei Shen
- Biliary and Pancreatic Department, Shanghai East Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Xu-Jing Wang
- Biliary and Pancreatic Department, Shanghai East Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Wei Gao
- Biliary and Pancreatic Department, Shanghai East Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Hui Zhang
- Biliary and Pancreatic Department, Shanghai East Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Hua Jiang
- Department of Gerontology, Shanghai East Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|