Phase II trial of 5-fluorouracil and the natural l isomer of folinic acid in the treatment of advanced colorectal carcinoma

The Prevalence of 5-Fluorouracil and Capecitabine Cardiotoxicity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background

The incidence of cardiotoxicity events in patients who use 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and capecitabine monotherapy remains unclear since previous studies reported the prevalence in patients who used combination regimens. We aimed to systematically review and meta-analyze the incidence of cardiotoxicity in fluorouracil and capecitabine monotherapy users.

Methods

The study protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023441627). Systematic searches were conducted in five databases (CINAHL, OpenGrey, PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Scopus). The Cochrane Risk-of-Bias tool and the Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies were used to evaluate the risk of bias. Pooled prevalence and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated using the DerSimonian-Laird random effect models. The funnel plot was used to assess the publication bias.

Results

Eighty studies were included. There were 24 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with low to high risk of bias and 56 non-RCTs with critical risk of bias. The pooled prevalence of cardiotoxicity from 5-FU was 3.5% (95% CI: 2.7 - 4.2; P < 0.001; I2 = 73.86%). The pooled prevalence of cardiotoxicity in capecitabine users was 2.8% (95% CI: 1.6 - 4.0; P < 0.001; I2 = 72.62%).

Conclusions

The prevalence of cardiotoxicity from 5-FU and capecitabine was classified as common. Cardiotoxicity may have not been associated with the cumulative dose of 5-FU or capecitabine.

Oral 5-fluorouracil in squamous cell carcinoma of the skin in the aged

Multiple or recurrent squamous cell skin carcinoma is a rare tumor in the aged. These patients are currently treated with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) cream as a local chemotherapy; in cases in which the disease progresses, few treatments are available. Two reports deal with the treatment of progressive squamous cell skin carcinoma with systemic 5-FU, but in only eight patients age less than 70 years. We prospectively investigated oral 5-FU therapy in 14 consecutive patients (average age 76 1/2 years) with histologically proven squamous cell skin carcinoma. The disease was aggressive, multiple, or recurrent and had not been eradicated by surgery, radiation therapy, topical 5-FU cream, and non-5-FU chemotherapy. Oral 5-FU was administered as mannitol-coated 5-FU tablets at the daily dose of 175 mg/m2 for 3 weeks every 5 weeks. Toxicity, effectiveness, quality of life, and compliance to therapy were evaluated. Total cycles amounted to 55 (range: 2-6, mean: 4 for each patient) at an average dose intensity of 740 mg/m2/week for from 12 to 36 weeks. Only gastrointestinal toxicity World Health grade I occurred. Quality of life and compliance to therapy were 90%. Therapy induced measurable improvement in nine patients (64.3%): two partial remissions (14.3%), three minimal remissions (21.4%), and four arrests of disease (28.6%) with a median duration of 30+ months. The study ended because of a lack of patients. We can conclude that, if elderly patients require chemotherapy because of progressive multiple or advanced squamous cell skin carcinoma, appreciable results may be obtained with oral 5-FU as a single agent.

Risk factors associated with mucositis in cancer patients receiving 5-fluorouracil

Oral mucositis is a dose-limiting toxicity of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). This prospective cohort study investigated factors associated with mucositis in patients receiving 5-FU for cancer of the digestive tract. Sixty-three patients (mean age 65 years) completed self-administered questionnaires and had interviews, oral examinations and unstimulated whole salivary flow measurements at baseline and follow-up appointments. The duration of follow-up was 2 months. Predictor variables included sociodemographic data, body surface area, diabetes, smoking, alcohol consumption, salivary flow, oral hygiene, presence of prostheses, performance status, regimen of cytotoxic drugs, hematological data, and herpes simplex virus antibody titer. Forty-six per cent of patients developed at least one episode of oral mucositis during cytotoxic treatment. Pearson's chi-square analysis showed that mucositis was significantly associated with xerostomia at baseline, xerostomia during chemotherapy, and lower baseline neutrophil counts (P < or = 0.05). Multiple logistic regression analysis indicated that xerostomia at baseline (odds ratio, OR = 10.0), or baseline neutrophil level under 4000 cells/mm3 (OR = 3.9) were significant predictors of mucositis. Taking into account the effect of neutrophil level at baseline, xerostomia during chemotherapy (OR = 4.5) was also a significant predictor of mucositis. The results showed that xerostomia and lower baseline neutrophil levels are significantly associated with oral mucositis. These variables should be taken into consideration in the design of intervention studies to reduce the frequency and severity of mucositis. More research is required to investigate the role of saliva and neutrophils in the pathogenesis of chemotherapy-induced mucositis.

A phase I trial of 5-day chronomodulated infusion of 5-fluorouracil and 1-folinic acid in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer

The aim of this phase I study was to establish the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), administered as a 5-day chronomodulated infusion in combination with 1-folinic acid (FA) to ambulatory metastatic colorectal cancer patients. Consecutive cohorts of 6 patients were given 5-FU and FA infusions from 10.00 p.m. to 10.00 a.m. with peak delivery at 4.00 a.m. by means of a multichannel programmable pump. The FA dose was always the same (150 mg/m2/d). For the first cohort, the 5-FU dose level was 600 mg/m2/d at the first course, escalated by 100 mg/m2 for each subsequent cohort. Intrapatient dose was also escalated by 100 mg/m2 if toxicity was less than grade 2. The courses were repeated every 3 weeks. Thirty-four patients (17 previously treated) received a total of 154 courses. Dose-limiting toxicity consisted of stomatitis and diarrhoea. No significant haematological, cutaneous or cardiac toxicity was encountered. The MTD of 5-FU was reached at the fourth level (first course at 900 mg/m2/d equal to 4500 mg/m2/course) with 5-FU increased to 1100 mg/m2/d (5500 mg/m2/course) in 4 patients. The received 5-FU dose intensity (DI) over the first 3 courses at this level was 1318 mg/m2/week. Thirty-three patients were assessed for response. An objective response was achieved in 1 out of the 13 previously-treated and in 8 out of the 20 previously-untreated patients. The chronomodulated infusion of 5-FU at a dose of 900 mg/m2/d, together with FA at 150 mg/m2/d for 5 days, was safely delivered to out-patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. The low toxic profile and activity of this regimen in previously untreated patients deserves further exploration for the treatment of 5-FU-sensitive tumours.

High-versus low-dose levo-leucovorin as a modulator of 5-fluorouracil in advanced colorectal cancer: a 'GISCAD' phase III study. Italian Group for the Study of Digestive Tract Cancer

BACKGROUND

Although leucovorin (LV) + 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) is considered the treatment of choice for advanced colorectal cancer in most countries, the optimal schedule of this combination has not yet been established. Low-dose LV appears to be as active as high-dose LV in the daily-times-five regimen, but no randomized study of the levorotatory stereoisomer (6S-LV) given at two different dose levels has been published.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between November 1991 and June 1994, 422 patients (all with measurable disease previously untreated with chemotherapy) were randomized to 6S-LV (100 mg/sqm/i.v.) + 5-FU (370 mg sqm/15 min i.v. infusion), both administered for 5 days every 28 days (arm A), or to 6S-LV (10 mg/sqm/i.v./5-FU (doses as above), also given for 5 days every 28 days (arm B). The primary endpoint of the study was the comparison of response rates (WHO criteria): the secondary endpoint was the assessment of survival and tolerability. No evaluation of the quality of life or the symptomatic effect of treatment was planned.

RESULTS

The response rate was 9.3% in arm A (95% CI: 5.4-13.1), with 2 CR and 18 PR, and 10.7% in arm B (95% CI: 6.5-14.9), with 3 CR + 19 PR, without any significant difference (P = 0.78). The median time to progression was eight months in both groups and overall survival was 11 months, with no difference between treatments. Toxicity mainly consisted of gastrointestinal side effects (mucositis and diarrhoea), which were rarely severe (grade 3-4: 5%-10% of patients) and similar in the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In this large-scale multicentre trial, the low and high doses of 6S-LV appeared to be equivalent in terms of the biochemical modulation of 5-FU in advanced colorectal cancer although, for several reasons (including the timing and the strict criteria of response evaluation, the high number of patients with unfavourable prognostic factors, the multi-institutional nature of the study, the dose and modality of 5-FU administration), the response rate was lower than that reported in some of the other published studies. Given the considerable difference in economic cost between the two dosages, the use of high-dose 6S-LV in the daily-times-five regimen is not recommended in clinical practice.

Double biochemical modulation of 5-fluorouracil by methotrexate and levo-folinic acid in the treatment of advanced digestive tract malignancies

The aim of this study was to evaluate the activity and toxicity of a double biochemical modulation of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) by means of methotrexate (MTX) and levo-folinic acid (LFA) in patients with advanced carcinoma of the digestive tract, and to assess the prognostic significance of MTX serum concentrations achieved in these patients. 94 patients affected by advanced carcinoma of the colon-rectum, stomach or biliary tract (47 of them previously untreated) received a regimen consisting of MTX 500 mg/m2 as a 2-h i.v. infusion on day 1, followed by LFA 250 mg/m2 as a 2-h i.v. infusion and 5-FU 600 mg/m2 as an i.v. bolus on day 2. Cycles were repeated every 2 weeks. Treatment was administered until tumour progression or for a maximum of 24 courses. MTX serum level was assessed soon after and 24 h (24-h MTXs) after its infusion in 61 patients. One complete and 22 partial responses were obtained, giving an overall activity of 24% (95% confidence interval, 16-34%). Response rate was 30% in chemotherapy-naive patients (colorectal, 26%; gastric, 37%; and biliary-tract, 22%) and 19% in those previously treated (all with fluoropyrimidines). A poor performance status adversely affected the response and survival of patients. The toxicity of treatment was very mild, and occurrence of severe diarrhoea (11% of patients) and mucositis (3%) was lower than that reported with other modulations of 5-FU. A cut-off value of 24-h MTXs was identified as a strong prognostic indicator. Patients with 24-h MTXs > or = 2 microM had a significantly better probability of response (37% versus 5%; P = 0.032), longer progression-free survival (5.3 versus 2.3 months; P = 0.023) and overall survival (10.8 versus 8.3 months; P = 0.045) on multivariate analysis. In chemotherapy-naive colorectal cancer patients, those with 24-h MTXs > or = 2 microM had a response rate of 38% (3/8), with a 19.6-month median survival time, as compared to no responses (0/4) and a 9.9-month median survival in the group with a lower serum concentration. The achievement of such MTX serum levels yielded a 31% (4/13) response rate even in colorectal patients who had previously received a 5-FU-FA treatment.

Prognostic variable in patients with advanced colorectal cancer treated with fluorouracil and leucovorin-based chemotherapy

Possible prognostic variables for tumor response, time to progression (TTP), and survival in 141 patients with advanced colorectal cancer treated with fluorouracil and leucovorin-based chemotherapy were analyzed. None of the variables examined for their possible influence on tumor response attained significance in the stepwise logistic regression. In the univariate analysis, variables found to be strongly associated with TTP were performance status (PS) (P = 0.0301), liver involvement (P = 0.030), and the initial values of WBC (P = 0.0319), lactic dehydrogenase (LDH; P = 0.0053), gamma-glutamyl-transpeptidase (gamma-GT; P = 0.0013), alkaline phosphatase (ALP; P = 0.0186), albumin (P = 0.0004), and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA; P = 0.0014). In the Cox analysis, liver involvement (P = 0.0553), albumin (P = 0.0181), PS (P = 0.484), and ALP (P = 0.0553) were retained as independently significant variables. When only patients with liver metastases were included in the analysis, then only albumin (P < 0.001) demonstrated a prognostic significance. Also, in the univariate analysis, variables predicting survival were PS (P = 0.0230), grade (P = 0.00600), liver involvement (P = 0.0002), LDH (P = 0.0001), gamma-GT (P < 0.001), ALP (P = 0.0006), albumin (P = 0.0309), and CEA (P = 0.005). With the multivariate analysis, gamma-GT (P = 0.0004), albumin (P = 0.0634), and CEA (P = 0.0804) were selected as significant. In those patients who presented with liver involvement, variables predicted survival were gamma-GT (P = 0.0041), albumin (P = 0.0442), and the percentage of involved liver parenchyma (P = 0.0690). These results could be helpful for the stratification of future trials in advanced colorectal cancer.