Combination Chemotherapy with Vinblastine, Bcnu and Cisplatin in Advanced Malignant Melanoma

A combination chemotherapy including vinblastine (6 mg/m2 i.v. days 1–2), BCNU (100 mg/m5 i.v. day 3), and cisplatin (50 mg/m1 i.v. day 5) was given as salvage treatment in 46 consecutive, previously treated patients affected by metastatic malignant melanoma. Courses were planned every 4 weeks provided that a complete bone marrow recovery occurred, otherwise they were delayed for 1–2 additional weeks. Objective responses (3 CRs and 10 PRs) were observed in 13/46 (28%) patients; 12 cases had stable disease and 21 patients progressive disease during treatment. Median duration of response was 13 months (range, 5–18), and median survival was 11 months (range, 3–20) for all patients. Nausea and vomiting were the most distressing side effects, whereas a grade I leukopenia caused a delayed treatment in 90% of patients. In conclusion, the combination chemotherapy was moderately toxic and did not seem to give substantially better results than obtained with other reported regimens.

Concurrent Modulation of 5-Fluorouracil with Methotrexate and L-leucovorin: An Effective and Moderately Toxic Regimen for the Treatment of Advanced Colorectal Carcinoma a Multicenter Phase II Study of the Southern Italy Cooperative Oncology Group

Aims and Background

Methotrexate (MTX) and leucovorin (LV) can enhance the cytotoxicity of 5-fluorouracil (5FU) by modifying its metabolic pathway inside target cells. Some preclinical studies and clinical trials have suggested that the concurrent or sequential double modulation of 5FU by means of MTX and LV may give a higher activity than single biochemical modulations. The purpose of our phase II study was to assess the activity and toxicity of a biweekly regimen including MTX, levo-LV and 5FU in colorectal cancer patients.

Methods

From July 1994 to May 1997, 100 consecutive patients affected by advanced or metastatic colorectal carcinoma were given MTX, 750 mg/m2 iv (2-h infusion) on day 1, and levo-LV, 250 mg/m2 iv (2-h infusion) followed by 5FU, 800 mg/m2 iv bolus on day 2, every two weeks. Patients were treated until complete response or progressive disease was documented, or for a maximum of 16 courses.

Results

Among 97 eligible patients, 5 complete and 25 partial responses were obtained, giving an overall response rate of 31% (95% exact confidence limits, 22-41%). Response rate was significantly higher in patients with a good (ECOG scale 0) than with a poor (ECOG scale 1 or 2) performance status (40% versus 17%, P <0.02). Median time to treatment failure was 27 weeks, median survival time was 63 (95% confidence limits, 54-71) weeks, and 2- and 3-year probability of survival were 34% and 12%, respectively. Performance status was the only pretreatment characteristic significantly affecting the outcome of patients. Indeed, median survival time was 94 weeks for patients with a performance status = 0 and 37 weeks for patients with a performance status ≥ 1 (P < 0.05). Toxicity of the treatment was low and manageable; grade 3 to 4 leukopenia affected 8% of patients, whereas grade 3 diarrhea and mucositis occurred in 5% and 4%, respectively.

Conclusions

The double biochemical modulation of 5FU by MTX and levo-LV is at least as effective as, and probably more effective than, the single modulation by MTX or by LV. It may therefore represent a therapeutic option for the palliative treatment of patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma.

Influence on Response to Therapy and Overall Survival of Mediastinal Involvement by Hodgkin's Disease

To assess the prognostic significance of mediastinal involvement of Hodgkin's disease, 91 patients with stage I to III disease treated at our Institute were reclassified according to size of mediastinal disease and other clinical and therapeutic characteristics. Complete remission (CR) was achieved in 46 of 67 (81%) patients without mediastinal involvement, and in 16 of 17 (94%) patients with small mediastinal masses, but only in 10 of 17 (59%) patients with large masses (P < 0.05). Twenty-seven of 32 (84%) patients treated with irradiation alone and 26 of 28 (93%) patients treated with combined modality therapy reached a CR, whereas such a result was obtained only in 19 of 31 (61%) patients who received MOPP chemotherapy alone (P < 0.01). In particular, none of the patients with large masses had a CR when treated with chemotherapy alone, whereas no differences in response to therapy were found between patients with large vs. small or no masses when irradiation or combined treatments were utilized. Since combined treatment seems to reach a high proportion of CR and to prevent extranodal relapse, further randomized clinical trials are needed to decide its routine utilization in patients with poor prognostic factors such as large mediastinal adenopathies.

Combination Chemotherapy with Cyclophosphamide, Adriamycin, Vincristine and Prednisone (CHOP) for Non-Hodgkin's Lymphomas with Unfavorable Histology: Preliminary Results

From January 1978 to June 1979, 29 selected, previously untreated patients with unfavorable histology of non-Hodgkin's lymphomas (12 DPDL, 7 DM, 9 DH and 1 DU) were submitted to the combination chemotherapy CHOP (cyclophosphamide, 750 mg/m2 i.v. on day 1; adriamycin, 50 mg/m2 i.v. on day 1; vincristine, 1.4 mg/m2 i.v. on day 1, and prednisone, 100 mg p.o. on day 1 through 5) every 21 days. Eighteen patients were in early stage (I or II) and 11 of them were also submitted to involved field radiotherapy (60Co), immediately before (stage I) or during (stage II) the chemotherapy, with a mean dosage of 4,500 rad. The remaining 11 patients were in advanced stage (III or IV) of disease and were treated with chemotherapy alone. We obtained 20 complete remissions (68%), 8 partial remissions (28 %) and 1 no response (4 %) to therapy. Sixteen of 18 patients (89 %) in early stages and 4 of 11 patients (36 %) in advanced stages achieved a complete remission. The bone marrow toxicity of the chemotherapy was moderate. Nausea, vomiting and diarrhea were frequent but well controlled by the support therapy. The actuarial survival rate of patients, after 18 months of follow-up, is 41 % (40 % in complete remission). The patients who achieved a complete remission are all alive and 65 % of them still relapse free. We believe that the combination chemotherapy CHOP improves the complete remission rate as well as the survival of patients with unfavorable histology of non-Hodgkin's lymphomas.

Combination Chemotherapy (CVP or Chop)-Radiotherapy Approach in Early Stage Non-Hodgkin's Lymphomas

From January 1978 to December 1980, 42 patients with early stage non-Hodgkin's lymphoma other than of the gastrointestinal tract were treated with radiotherapy and combination chemotherapy. Eighteen patients in stage I were submitted to locally extended-field radiotherapy up to a mean dose of 48 Gy with a Co60 source and, after a 3-week rest period, to 6 cycles of combination chemotherapy. Twenty-four patients in stage II received 3 cycles of combination chemotherapy before and after irradiation, the same as for stage I. Combination chemotherapy consisted of cyclophosphamide, vincristine and prednisone (CVP) for 15 cases with favorable histology (3 NWDL, 1 NPDI, 11 DWDL), whereas it included cyclophosphamide, adriamycin, vincristine and prednisone (CHOP) for 27 cases with unfavorable histology (20 DPDL, 3 DM, 4 DH). Complete remission (CR) was achieved in 35/42 (83%) patients, with a highly significant difference between stage I (100%) and stage II (71%). After 42 months of follow-up, the probability of survival for all patients was 72%. Survival was better for stage I (88%) than for stage II (68%) and for favorable histology (87%) as compared to unfavorable histology (70%). Furthermore, survival was highly influenced by response to therapy. Indeed, actuarial survival rate for CR was 91% as compared to a median survival time of 10.2 months for the remaining patients. Four patients, all with poor histology, relapsed after 5–24 (mean 11) months of CR. Only one of them had an extension in extranodal sites and eventually died, despite the salvage treatment utilized. In our experience, locally extended-field irradiation combined with chemotherapy gave a high proportion of CR and seemed to prevent relapses, particularly in extranodal sites.

Randomized trial on adjuvant treatment with FOLFIRI followed by docetaxel and cisplatin versus 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid for radically resected gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

Some trial have demonstrated a benefit of adjuvant fluoropirimidine with or without platinum compounds compared with surgery alone. ITACA-S study was designed to evaluate whether a sequential treatment of FOLFIRI [irinotecan plus 5-fluorouracil/folinic acid (5-FU/LV)] followed by docetaxel plus cisplatin improves disease-free survival in comparison with 5-FU/LV in patients with radically resected gastric cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with resectable adenocarcinoma of the stomach or gastroesophageal junction were randomly assigned to either FOLFIRI (irinotecan 180 mg/m(2) day 1, LV 100 mg/m(2) as 2 h infusion and 5-FU 400 mg/m(2) as bolus, days 1 and 2 followed by 600 mg/m(2)/day as 22 h continuous infusion, q14 for four cycles) followed by docetaxel 75 mg/m(2) day 1, cisplatin 75 mg/m(2) day 1, q21 for three cycles (sequential arm) or De Gramont regimen (5-FU/LV arm).

RESULTS

From February 2005 to August 2009, 1106 patients were enrolled, and 1100 included in the analysis: 562 in the sequential arm and 538 in the 5-FU/LV arm. With a median follow-up of 57.4 months, 581 patients recurred or died (297 sequential arm and 284 5-FU/LV arm), and 483 died (243 and 240, respectively). No statistically significant difference was detected for both disease-free [hazard ratio (HR) 1.00; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.85-1.17; P = 0.974] and overall survival (OS) (HR 0.98; 95% CI: 0.82-1.18; P = 0.865). Five-year disease-free and OS rates were 44.6% and 44.6%, 51.0% and 50.6% in the sequential and 5-FU/LV arm, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

A more intensive regimen failed to show any benefit in disease-free and OS versus monotherapy.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01640782.

Ceravolo C, Miserocchi L, Mambrini A, Del Freo A, Zamagni D, Rabbi C, Marangolo M. Ceravolo

Gemcitabine is considered the gold standard treatment for unresectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Intra-arterial drug administration had shown some interesting results in small phase II studies. In this study, patients were randomly assigned to receive gemcitabine at a dose of 1,000 mg/m2 over 30 minutes intravenously weekly for 7 weeks, followed by 1 week of rest, then weekly for 3 weeks every 4 weeks or FLEC: 5-fluoruracil 1,000 mg/m2, leucovorin 100 mg/m2, epirubicin 60 mg/m2, carboplatin 300 mg/m2 infused bolus intra-arterially into celiac axis at a 3-week interval 3 times or 5-fluorouracil 400 mg/m2 plus folinic acid 20 mg/m2 for 5 days every 4 weeks for 6 cycles. The primary endpoint was overall survival, while time to treatment failure, response rate, clinical benefit response were secondary endpoints. Sixty-seven patients were randomly allocated gemcitabine and 71 were allocated FLEC intra-arterially. Patients treated with FLEC lived for significantly longer than patients on gemcitabine (p=0.036). Survival at 1 year increased from 21% in the gemcitabine group to 35% in the FLEC group. Median survival was 7.9 months in the FLEC group and 5.8 months in the gemcitabine group. Median time to treatment failure was longer with FLEC (5.3 vs 4.2 months for FLEC vs gemcitabine respectively; p=0.013). Clinical benefit was similar in both groups (17.9% for gemcitabine and 26.7% for FLEC; p=NS). CT-scan partial response was similar in both groups (5.9% for gemcitabine and 14% for FLEC; p=NS). Toxicity profiles were different. Compared with gemcitabine, the FLEC regimen given intra-arterially improved survival in patients with unresectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

A phase I/II trial of non-pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, docetaxel and trastuzumab as first-line treatment in HER-2-positive locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer

AIM

To assess the activity and safety of non-pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (Myocet®) in combination with docetaxel and trastuzumab as first-line treatment of patients with HER-2/neu-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The maximum tolerated dose of the combination was defined in the phase I part of the study. In the phase II part, 45 HER-2/neu-positive MBC patients were enrolled to receive 6-8 cycles of Myocet® 50 mg/m2 (day 1), docetaxel 30 mg/m2 (days 2 and 9) plus trastuzumab (day 2, 4 mg/kg followed by 2 mg/kg/week) every 21 d until unacceptable toxicity or progression occurred. Objective response (primary end-point) and treatment tolerability were assessed according to World Health Organisation criteria. Cardiotoxicity was defined as signs and/or symptoms of congestive heart failure and/or a decrease in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF).

RESULTS

The overall response rate was 55.6% (complete response 8.9%, partial response 46.7%), with a median time-to-progression of 10.9 months (C.I. 8.7-15.0). Median overall survival was not reached. The most frequent grade 3-4 adverse events were granulocytopaenia (60.0%), leukocytopenia (43.2%) and alopecia (35.6%). Grade 3-4 diarrhoea, pain, oral and skin toxicity (4.4%, each) and nausea/vomiting, thrombocytopenia and elevated alkaline phosphatase (2.2%, each) were also reported. In 2 patients LVEF fell to <50%, with a decrease from baseline>15%. LVEF median values remained stable from baseline to the end of the study (60%).

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of Myocet®, docetaxel and trastuzumab is safe and shows promising activity as first-line treatment of HER-2-positive MBC.

Preoperative weekly cisplatin-epirubicin-paclitaxel with G-CSF support in triple-negative large operable breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Findings from our previously published phase II study showed a high pathologic complete remission (pCR) rate in patients with triple-negative large operable breast cancer after the administration of eight cisplatin-epirubicin-paclitaxel (PET) weekly cycles. The safety and efficacy data of the initial population were updated, with inclusion of additional experience with the same therapy.

METHODS

Patients with triple-negative large operable breast cancer (T2-T3 N0-1; T > 3 cm) received eight preoperative weekly cycles of cisplatin 30 mg/m2, epirubicin 50 mg/m2, paclitaxel (Taxol) 120 mg/m2, with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (5 microg/kg days 3-5) support.

RESULTS

Overall 74 consecutive patients (T2/T3 = 35/39; N0/N+ = 26/48) were treated, from May 1999 to May 2008. At pathological assessment, 46 women (62%; 95% confidence interval 50-73) showed pCR in both breast and axilla. At a 41-month median follow-up (range 3-119), 13 events (nine distant metastases) had occurred, 5-year projected disease-free survival (DFS) and distant disease-free survival being 76% and 84%, respectively. Five-year DFS was 90% and 56% in pCRs and non-pCRs, respectively. Severe neutropenia and anemia occurred in 23 (31%) and eight (10.8%) patients, respectively. Severe non-hematological toxicity was recorded in <20% of patients. Peripheral neuropathy was quite frequent but never severe.

CONCLUSIONS

Eight weekly PET cycles are a highly effective primary treatment in women with triple-negative large operable breast cancer. This approach results in a very promising long-term DFS in this poor prognosis population. This triplet regimen is worthy of evaluation in phase III trials.

Phase II study of liposomal doxorubicin (Myocet®), docetaxel and trastuzumab combination as first line treatment of patients with her-2/neu positive locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer

Abstract #3149

Objective: the aims of the study are to assess activity and safety of liposomal doxorubicin (Myocet®) in combination with Docetaxel and Trastuzumab as first-line treatment of patients with HER-2/neu positive MBC.&#x2028; Methods: forty-six (46) non treated patients with metastatic HER2-overexpressing BC were planned to receive Myocet 50 mg/m2 (d1) and Docetaxel 30 mg/m2 (d2 and d9) plus Trastuzumab (d2, 4 mg/kg followed by 2 mg/kg weekly) for at least 6 cycles (up to a maximum of 8 unless occurrence of unacceptable toxicity or PD). Cycles were repeated every 21 days. Objective response was assessed according to WHO criteria every 3 cycles. To evaluate the tolerability WHO grading toxicity events were assessed at each cycle. Cardiotoxicity was defined as signs and/or symptoms of CHF and/or a decrease in LVEF below normal limit (&lt; 50%) or a decline ≥ 15% from baseline value. To evaluate LVEF an echocardiography was done at baseline and at cycles 3, 6 and 8.&#x2028; Results: we reported preliminary results of 46 patients enrolled. 41 patients completed at least 3 cycles and at first response evaluation Complete Response was seen in 2 pts (CR=4,9%), Partial Response in 22 pts (PR=53,7%), Stable Disease in 15 pts (SD=36,6%) and Progression Disease in 2 pts (PD=4,9%). The Overall Response Rate (ORR) was 58,6%.&#x2028; 36 pts completed the planned chemotherapy (6 cycles): Complete Response was seen in 4 pts (CR=11,1%), Partial Response in 15 pts (PR=41,7%), Stable Disease in 9 (SD=25,0%) and Progression Disease in 8 pts (PD=22,2%). The Overall Response Rate (ORR) was 52,8%. 12 pts were entered in the follow up and for this subgroup median TTP was 13 months.&#x2028; All 46 enrolled patients were included in the safety analysis. Most frequent toxicity events occurred during the study were: granulocytopenia Grade 4 in 16 pts (30.4%), leukocytopenia Grade 3 in 15 pts (32.6%), increase of transaminase levels Grade 1 in 14 pts (30.4%), alopecia Grade 4 in 16 pts (34.8%) and nausea Grade 2 in 13 pts (28.3%). In 2 patients LVEF dropped &lt; 50% and other 2 pts registered a decrease of LVEF &gt;15% with respect to baseline value. In the whole population LVEF mean value changed from 62.6 ± 4.9 at baseline to 61.0 ± 5.5 at cycle 3, to 62.9 ± 6.4 (cycle 6) and to 60.0 ± 8.1 (cycle 8).&#x2028; Conclusion: these preliminary results suggest that the combination of non-pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, docetaxel and trastuzumab has shown a promising activity in first line MBC. The combination is safe with no significant change in LVEF values from baseline to the end of therapy.

Citation Information: Cancer Res 2009;69(2 Suppl):Abstract nr 3149.

High rate of TRG1–2 and prolonged RFS with OXA/TOM and FU/LFA during preoperative pelvic RT in patients with poor prognosis locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC)

14500

Background: We have previously reported that 3 cycles of Oxaliplatin (OXA), Raltitrexed (TOM) and 5-Fluorouracile (FU) + levo-folinic acid (LFA) during pelvic RT had an acceptable toxicity and produced a complete (TRG1, 42%) or subtotal (TRG2, 29%) pathologic tumor regression in 71% of 31 pts with poor prognosis LARC (Avallone et al, Br J Cancer 2006). Here we report an expanded experience on such treatment. Methods: We enrolled 62 eligible pts (M, 33; F, 29), with median age of 58 (27–79) yrs, and adenocarcinoma of the extraperitoneal rectum, with at least one of the following characteristics: cT4 (N pts), cN+ (N), cT3N0 with tumor location = 5 cm from the anal verge and/or CRM +ve (assessed by MRI) (N). Pts received 3 biweekly courses of OXA 100 mg/sqm + TOM 2.5 mg/sqm on day 1, and LFA 250 mg/sqm + FU 900 mg/sqm (31 pts) or 800 mg/sqm (31 pts) on day 2, and concomitant pelvic RT (1.8 Gy/day, total dose 45 Gy). TME was planned 8 weeks after the end of treatment. Pathologic response was evaluated by tumor regression grading (TRG) according to Mandard’s modified classification. Pts with cT4, pN+ and pCRM +ve received also 4 months of weekly FU/FA. Results: All pts received full dose of RT, and 98% of the planned CT cycles. Neutropenia was the most common grade = 3 toxicity (40%), while grade 3 diarrhea was seen in 19% of pts with FU 900 mg/sqm, and in only 6% of pts with FU 800 mg/sqm. All but 2 pts had a TME with R0 resection, and no treatment-related or perioperative death occurred. Median number of sampled lymph nodes was 36 (range, 10–80). 28 (45%) pts obtained a TRG1, and 17 (27%) pts a TRG2. Activity of the treatment was similar in all risk groups, regardless of FU dosage. 1 pt suffered a local recurrence (after 9 months), and 3 pts had distant metastases (after 22, 33, and 47 months). After a median follow-up of 34 (range 6–54) months, all pts are alive, and the estimated 34-month RFS was 95%. All pts achieving a TRG1, and all but one with TRG2 (pCRM +ve), were recurrence-free. Conclusions: These data confirm the feasibility and activity of the whole treatment. A slight reduction of FU dosage appeared to improve the safety of this combination. Currently, we are now evaluating the addition of bevacizumab 5 mg/kg every 2 weeks before and during this concurrent treatment.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Weekly cisplatin, epirubicin, and paclitaxel with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support vs triweekly epirubicin and paclitaxel in locally advanced breast cancer: final analysis of a sicog phase III study

The present study aimed at evaluating whether a weekly cisplatin, epirubicin, and paclitaxel (PET) regimen could increase the pathological complete response (pCR) rate in comparison with a tri-weekly epirubicin and paclitaxel administration in locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) patients. Patients with stage IIIB disease were randomised to receive either 12 weekly cycles of cisplatin 30 mg m⁻², epirubicin 50 mg m⁻², and paclitaxel 120 mg m⁻² (PET) plus granulocyte-colony stimulating factor support, or four cycles of epirubicin 90 mg m⁻²+paclitaxel 175 mg m⁻² (ET) every 3 weeks. Overall, 200 patients (PET/ET=100/100) were included in this study. A pCR in both breast and axilla occurred in 16 (16%) PET patients and in six (6%) ET patients (P=0.02). The higher activity of PET was evident only in ER negative (27.5 vs 5.4%; P=0.026), and in HER/neu positive (31 vs 5%; P=0.037) tumours. The two arms yielded similar pCR rate in ER positive (PET/ET=7.5/7.1%) and HER/neu negative (PET/ET=10/6%) patients. At a 39 months median follow-up, 70 patients showed a progression or relapses (PET, 32 vs ET, 38). Anaemia, mucositis, peripheral neuropathy, and gastrointestinal toxicity were substantially more frequent in the PET arm. The PET weekly regimen is superior to ET in terms of pCR rate in LABC patients with ER negative and/or HER2 positive tumours Mature data in terms of disease-free and overall survival are needed to ascertain whether this approach could improve the prognosis of these subsets of LABC patients.

Tailored vinorelbine-capecitabine treatment in elderly metastatic breast cancer patients. A SICOG phase II study

10556

Purpose: To determine the antitumor activity of vinorelbine (VNR) and capecitabine (Xeloda) when given together, as first-line treatment, in elderly metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients. Patients and Methods: MBC patients, aged >65 years, with no prior chemotherapy for metastatic disease, received capecitabine 1,000–1,250 mg/m2 d 1→14 and VNR 20–25 mg/m2 d 1–8, q3wk for a maximum of 6 cycles. Doses of VNR and Xeloda were alternately escalated in each patient (VNR 20→25 on 2nd cycle, Xeloda 1,000→1,250 on 3rd cycle), in absence or relevant hematologic/nonhematologic toxicity. Results: Forty-seven MBC pts., median age 72 (range: 66–82) were enrolled. Metastatic sites: visceral/other = 30/17. Adjuvant chemotherapy: Yes/no = 21/27. The doses were escalated as planned in 24/47 pts. To date, 41/47 pts. are evaluable for response. Three CRs and 25 PRs have been recorded, giving a 68% ORR (Visceral/other = 59%/85%). At a median follow-up of 15.3 months, 19 pts. have progressed, and 18 died, median PFS and OS being 14.1, and 20.3 months, respectively. Toxicity has been in general mild or moderate. Grade 3–4 neutropenia has occurred in 29% of pts., with only 2 episodes of neutropenic sepsis. Severe gastrointestinal side effects have been observed in only 2 pts., while severe mucositis and hand-foot syndrome have never occurred. Conclusions: VNR-Xeloda combination is highly active in elderly MBC patients. The adoption of an intrapatient dose escalation permits to minimize the risk of severe toxicity, without compromising efficacy. The accrual still continues until the planned sample size (60 pts.).

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Weekly cisplatin-epirubicin-paclitaxel (PET) with granulocyte-colony stimulating factor support versus tri-weekly epirubicin-paclitaxel in locally advanced breast cancer: Final comprehensive and subgroup analysis of a SICOG phase III study

572

Background: We previously reported the preliminary pathological response data of a phase III trial comparing a weekly dose-dense approach (PET) to a standard epirubicin-paclitaxel q3wk combination, in LABC pts. (ASCO 2004; abstr.511). In the present abstract, we report the final data on response and PFS, and a subgroup analysis according to the hormone-receptor, and HER2/neu status. Methods: Overall, 200 patients with stage IIIB disease were randomised to receive either 12 weekly cycles of cisplatin 30 mg/m2, epirubicin 50 mg/m2, and paclitaxel 120 mg/m2 (PET) plus granulocyte-colony stimulating factor support, or 4 cycles of epirubicin 90 mg/m2 + paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 (ET) every 3 weeks. Results: Overall, a pCR in both breast and axilla occurred in 16 (16%) PET patients and in 6 (6%) ET patients (P=0.02). The higher activity of PET was evident only in ER negative (27.5% vs 5.4%; P=0.026), and in HER/neu 3+ (31% vs 5%; P=0.037) tumours. The 2 arms yielded similar pCR rate in ER positive (PET/ET=7.5%/7.1%) and HER/neu negative (PET/ET=10%/6%) patients. At a 45 months median follow-up, 78 patients showed a progression or relapse (PET= 32 vs ET= 46). The 5-year Failure-free survival rates in PET/ET arms were: Total =27%/21%; ER+= 26%/23%; ER- =25%/9%; HER2+=.18%/11%; HER2- =29%/25%. Conclusions: The PET weekly regimen is superior to ET in terms of pCR rate in LABC patients. The advantage of such an aggressive approach is limited to ER negative and HER2 positive pts. A large randomised trial comparing weekly PET to a standard regimen in ER- LABC pts., with FFS as the main end-point, is highly recommendable.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Weekly Docetaxel and Gemcitabine as First-Line Treatment for Metastatic Breast Cancer: Results of a Multicenter Phase II Study

OBJECTIVES

We conducted a multicenter phase II study to evaluate the clinical efficacy, toxicity, and dose intensity of a new weekly schedule of docetaxel and gemcitabine as first-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer patients.

METHODS

We enrolled 58 patients, 52% of whom had received a previous anthracycline-containing chemotherapy. The treatment schedule was: docetaxel 35 mg/m2 and gemcitabine 800 mg/m2 i.v. on days 1, 8, 15 every 28 days.

RESULTS

All patients were assessable for toxicity and 56 for efficacy. Overall response rate was 64.3% with 16.1% of complete responses and 48.2% of partial responses. Median survival was 22.10 months (95% CI: 15.53-28.67) and median time to tumor progression was 13.6 months (95% CI: 10.71-16.49). The most common hematological toxicity was neutropenia (no febrile neutropenia), which occurred in 28 patients (48.3%) but grade 3-4 in only 8 patients (14%). Alopecia, the most common nonhematological toxicity, occurred in 20 (34.5%) patients, but only 5 patients (8.6%) experienced grade 3 alopecia.

CONCLUSION

The activity of docetaxel and gemcitabine in metastatic breast cancer is confirmed. The promising results of the employed schedule, in agreement with other published studies, need to be further confirmed within a phase III study.

A 2-month cisplatin–epirubicin–paclitaxel (PET) weekly combination as primary systemic therapy for large operable breast cancer: a phase II study

PURPOSE

The present study aimed to define the antitumor activity of eight cisplatin-epirubicin-paclitaxel (PET) weekly cycles with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) support in patients with large operable breast cancer.

METHODS

Operable breast cancer (T2-3 N0-1; T >3 cm) patients received eight preoperative weekly cycles of cisplatin 30 mg/m2, epirubicin 50 mg/m2 and paclitaxel 120 mg/m2, with G-CSF (5 microg/kg, days 3-5) support.

RESULTS

Sixty-three patients (T2/T3=30/33; N0/N+=8/55) were enrolled. Thirty-one clinical complete (49%) and 30 partial (48%) responses were recorded, giving a 97% response rate (95% confidence interval 89% to 100%). Breast-sparing surgery was performed in 32/63 (51%) patients. At pathological assessment, 28 patients (45%) showed absence of invasive residual disease in breast and 34 (55%) had negative axilla. In 20 women (32%) both breast and axilla were found to be disease-free. At a 23-month median follow-up (range 4-63), only eight relapses and two deaths had occurred, with the 4-year projected relapse-free and overall survival being 59% and 95%, respectively. Grade 3-4 neutropenia and anemia occurred in 24% and 5% of patients, respectively. Emesis, diarrhea and mucositis were the main non-hematological toxicities; however, only nine (14%) patients experienced one or more episodes of severe non-hematological toxicity. Peripheral neuropathy was frequent, but never severe.

CONCLUSIONS

A 2-month weekly treatment with PET represents a well tolerated and highly effective approach in large operable breast cancer patients. In spite of the short duration of chemotherapy, one-third of patients achieved a complete eradication of the tumor in both breast and axilla.

Microsatellite instability and mutation analysis among southern Italian patients with colorectal carcinoma: detection of different alterations accounting for MLH1 and MSH2 inactivation in familial cases

BACKGROUND

Microsatellite instability (MSI) is due to defective DNA mismatch repair (MMR) and has been detected at various rates in colorectal carcinoma (CRC). The role of MSI in colorectal tumorigenesis was assessed further in this study by both microsatellite analysis of two CRC subsets [unselected patients (n = 215) and patients <50 years of age (n = 95)], and mutation screening of the two major MMR genes MLH1 and MSH2 among familial CRC cases.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

PCR-based microsatellite analysis was performed on paraffin-embedded tissues. In CRC families, MLH1/MSH2 mutation analysis and MLH1/MSH2 immunostaining were performed on germline DNA and MSI+ tumour tissues, respectively.

RESULTS

The MSI+ phenotype was detected in 75 (24%) patients, with higher incidence in early-onset or proximally located tumours. Among 220 patients investigated for family cancer history, MSI frequency was markedly higher in familial [18/27 (67%)] than in sporadic [32/193 (17%)] cases. Three MLH1 and six MSH2 germline mutations were identified in 14 out of 36 (39%) CRC families. Prevalence of MLH1/MSH2 mutations in CRC families was significantly increased by the presence of: (i) fulfilled Amsterdam criteria; (ii) four or more CRCs; or (iii) one or more endometrial cancer. While MSH2 was found mostly mutated, almost all [8/9 (89%)] familial MSI+ cases with loss of the MLH1 protein were negative for MLH1 germline mutations.

CONCLUSIONS

Both genetic (for MSH2) and gene-silencing (for MLH1) alterations seem to be involved in CRC pathogenesis.

Randomised trial of gemcitabine versus flec regimen given intra-arterially for patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer

Gemcitabine is considered the golden standard treatment for unresectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Intra-arte-rial drug administration had shown a deep rationale with some interesting results. In a multicenter phase III trial, we compared gemcitabine given weekly with a combination of 5-fluoruracil, leucovorin, epirubicin, carboplatin (FLEC) administered intra-arteriously as first-line therapy in unresectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Patients were randomly assigned to receive gemcitabine at a dose of 1,000 mg/m2 over 30 minutes intravenously weekly for 7 weeks, followed by 1 week of rest, then weekly for 3 weeks every 4 weeks or 5-fluoruracil 1,000 mg/m2, leucovorin 100 mg/m2, epirubicin 60 mg/m2, carboplatin 300 mg/m2 infused bolus intra-arteriously at three-weekly interval for 3 times. The primary end point was overall survival, while time to treatment failure, response rate, clinical benefit response were secondary endpoints. Sixty-seven patients were randomly allocated gemcitabine and 71 were allocated FLEC intra-arterially. Patients treated with FLEC lived for significantly longer than patients on gemcitabine (p=.036). Survival at 1 year was increased from 21% in the gemcitabine group to 35% in the FLEC group. Median survival was 7.9 months in the FLEC group and 5.8 months in the gemcitabine group. Median time to treatment failure was longer with FLEC (5.3 vs 4.2 months for FLEC vs gemcitabine respectively; p=.013). Clinical benefit was similar in both groups (17.9% for gemcitabine and 26.7% for FLEC; p=NS). CT-scan partial response was similar in both group (5.9% for gemcitabine and 14% for FLEC; p=NS). Toxicity profiles were different. Compared with gemcitabine, FLEC regimen given intra-arteriously, improved survival in patient with unresectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

[Early evaluation using PET-FDG of the efficiency of neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy treatment in locally advanced neoplasia of the lower rectum]

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Preoperative chemoradiation allows downstaging of locally advanced rectal cancer and in selected patients also a sufficient downsizing to ensure sphincter preservation. Selection of patients warranting a preoperative approach is improved by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) which is able to define the involvement of mesorectal circumferential margin. Similarly it would be crucial to define the response to chemoradiation during the treatment but traditional morphologic imaging techniques may fail in differentiating neoplastic tissue from scarring. PET-FDG has been successfully used in the detection of metastatic colorectal cancer allowing imaging of deposits as small as 0.5 cm and may have a role in evaluating early response to chemoradiation.

METHODS

In the present study, in patients with T3-T4 rectal cancer undergoing preoperative chemoradiation PET-FDG and flow cytometry analysis on endoscopic biopsy specimen have been performed before, during and after preoperative chemoradiation.

RESULTS

Chemoradiation treatment has been successful in terms of downsizing and downstaging of the tumor. PET-FDG was able to demonstrate local response at only ten-fifteen days after the beginning of neoadjuvant therapy, also identifying non responding patients.

CONCLUSIONS

FDG-PET may have a role in defining the response to chemoradiation and modulate the treatments strategy in patients with advanced rectal cancer.

Results of randomised phase II studies comparing S16020 with methotrexate in patients with recurrent head and neck cancer

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to carry out two randomised phase II trials of S16020, a new olivacine derivative, tested as a single agent in patients with recurrent head and neck cancer, using methotrexate as the control arm to validate the results.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

S16020 at either 80 or 100 mg/m2 was administered as a 3-h infusion every 3 weeks. Methotrexate, 40 or 50 mg/m2, was given by bolus injection, weekly for a minimum of 6 weeks. In total, 36 patients were entered in the randomised studies (25 in an initial study, 11 in a confirmatory study) of whom 24 received S16020 and 12 received methotrexate.

RESULTS

A scheduled interim analysis showed one patient having a non-confirmed objective response with S16020 and three patients having a confirmed objective response with methotrexate. In the methotrexate group, there were no patients with severe non-haematological toxicity. With S16020, there was a high incidence of severe non-haematological toxicities, including asthenia, oedema of the face, oedema and pain at the tumour sites and erythematous rash; consequently, both studies were stopped.

CONCLUSIONS

Both studies were stopped due to the poor anticipated benefit/risk ratio for S16020, although time to progression and overall survival time were similar in both treatment arms.

Oxaliplatin plus irinotecan and leucovorin-modulated 5-fluorouracil triplet regimen every other week: a dose-finding study in patients with advanced gastrointestinal malignancies

BACKGROUND

Oxaliplatin (OXA) and irinotecan (IRI) are active drugs in first-line as well as second-line treatment of advanced colorectal cancer patients, their toxicity profiles are not overlapping, and both drugs have shown synergism with folinic acid-modulated 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). We planned this phase I study to define the dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), the maximum tolerated doses (MTDs), and the recommended doses (RDs) for a triplet regimen including OXA plus IRI on day 1, and 6S-folinic acid (LFA) plus 5-FU on day 2, every 2 weeks.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

At least three patients had to be treated at each dose level, and the trial proceeded if no more than 33% of patients showed a DLT after the first cycle. Starting from OXA 85 mg/m(2) (over 2 h) and IRI 150 mg/m(2) (over 1 h), an alternated escalation was planned up to 110 mg/m(2) and 200 mg/m(2), respectively. Thereafter, a fixed dose of LFA, 250 mg/m(2) (as 2-h infusion), plus an escalating dose of 5-FU (from 650 to 800 mg/m(2) as an intravenous bolus) was added on day 2 to the previous dose level of OXA and IRI.

RESULTS

Forty-six patients, all but four affected by advanced colorectal primaries, entered this study. The MTDs for OXA and IRI given on the same day were 110 and 200 mg/m(2): these doses caused a DLT in three of six patients. The previous dose level (110 and 175 mg/m(2), respectively) on day 1 was safely followed on day 2 by LFA plus 5-FU up to 800 mg/m(2). Indeed, only one of three patients treated at this last level had a DLT. This cohort was then expanded including a total of 14 patients, and on the whole series five cases of DLT occurred: WHO grade 4 neutropenia (two patients), grade 3 or 4 diarrhoea (three patients). Cumulative toxicity was analysed in 43 patients for a total of 347 cycles: grade 4 neutropenia was detected in 13 patients (30%); it was not dose-related, nor was it exacerbated by the addition of modulated 5-FU. Febrile neutropenia occurred in four patients. Grade 3 or 4 diarrhoea was suffered by nine (21%) and five (12%) patients, respectively. Two complete and nine partial responses were reported on 40 evaluable patients (six patients were disease-free at study entry), giving a response rate of 27.5% (95% confidence interval 15% to 44%); nine of 18 (50%) assessable patients of the two last cohorts treated with the triplet regimen achieved a complete response (two patients) or a partial response (seven patients).

CONCLUSIONS

The RDs for this biweekly regimen were: OXA 110 mg/m(2) plus IRI 175 mg/m(2) on day 1, and LFA 250 mg/m(2) plus 5-FU 800 mg/m(2) on day 2. This regimen appeared active in pretreated gastrointestinal malignancies, and it is worthy of being evaluated in advanced colorectal carcinoma after failure of 5-FU-based adjuvant or palliative treatment.

Prevalence and prognostic role of microsatellite instability in patients with rectal carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Association between microsatellite instability (MSI) and favorable postoperative survival in patients with colorectal cancer receiving adjuvant chemotherapy has been indicated. To evaluate whether an analogous positive prognostic role of MSI could be present in rectal carcinoma (RC; most RC patients receive adjuvant radiotherapy), PCR-based microsatellite analysis of archival RCs and statistical correlation with clinico-pathological parameters were performed.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

DNA from paraffin-embedded paired samples of tumors and corresponding normal tissue from 91 RC patients was analyzed for MSI using five microsatellite markers (tumors were classified as MSI(+) when two or more markers were unstable).

RESULTS

Seventeen (19%) RC patients exhibited a MSI(+) phenotype. Prevalence of instability was found in patients with earlier RC onset (28% in cases with diagnosis age < or =55 years versus 15% in cases >55 years), whereas similar MSI frequencies were observed in patients with different disease stage or receiving different adjuvant therapies. While MSI was detected in seven (64%) of 11 familial patients, a remarkably lower MSI incidence was observed in sporadic cases (10/80; 12.5%). A significant association with better disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) was found for MSI(+) patients (median DFS/OS, 30/32 months) in comparison to MSI(-) ones (median DFS/OS, 18/21 months) (P <0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

MSI was demonstrated to be a strong molecular prognostic marker in rectal carcinoma, independent of the administered treatment (radiotherapy, chemotherapy or both).

Oxaliplatin plus raltitrexed and leucovorin-modulated 5-fluorouracil i.v. bolus: a salvage regimen for colorectal cancer patients

The aim of the present study was to define the activity and tolerability of a triplet regimen including oxaliplatin 130 mg x m(-2) (2 h i.v. infusion) and raltitrexed 3.0 mg x m(-2) (15 min i.v. infusion) given on day 1, followed by levo-folinic acid 250 mg x m(-2) (2 h i.v. infusion) and 5-fluorouracil 1050 mg x m(-2) i.v. bolus on day 2, every 2 weeks, in pretreated colorectal cancer patients. From April 1999 to December 2000, 50 patients were enrolled: 26 were males and 24 females, their median age was 63 (range, 43-79) years; ECOG performance status was 0 in 26 patients, > or =1 in 24 patients; 26 patients had received previous adjuvant chemotherapy, 40 patients had been exposed to one or two lines of palliative chemotherapy (including irinotecan in 31 cases); 18 patients were considered chemo-refractory. A total of 288 cycles were administered, with a median number of 6 (range 1-12) courses per patient. A complete response was obtained in three patients, and a partial response in nine patients, giving a major response rate of 24% (95% confidence interval, 13-38%), while 15 further patients showed a stable disease, for an overall control of tumour growth in 60% of patients. Three complete responses and three partial responses were obtained in patients pretreated with irinotecan (response rate, 19%); among refractory patients, three achieved partial responses (response rate, 13%). After a median follow-up of 18 (range, 10-30) months, 40 patients showed a progression of disease: the growth modulation index ranged between 0.2 and 2.5: it was > or =1.33 (showing a significant delay of tumour growth) in 16 (40%) patients. Actuarial median progression-free survival time was 7.6 months, and median survival time was 13.6 months: estimated probability of survival was 55% at 1 year. Main severe toxicity was neutropenia: World Health Organisation grade 4 affected 32% of patients; non-haematological toxicity was mild: World Health Organisation grade 3 diarrhoea was complained of by 8%, and grade 3 stomatitis by 4% of patients; neurotoxicity (according to Lévi scale) was scored as grade 3 in 8% of patients. In conclusion, this regimen was manageable and active as salvage treatment of advanced colorectal cancer patients; it showed incomplete cross-resistance with irinotecan-based treatments, and proved to delay the progression of disease in a relevant proportion of treated patients.

Patient preference and pharmacokinetics of oral modulated UFT versus intravenous fluorouracil and leucovorin: a randomised crossover trial in advanced colorectal cancer

The aim of this study was to determine the patient's preference for oral UFT/leucovorin (LV) or intravenous (i.v.) 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/LV chemotherapy in metastatic colorectal cancer and to compare 5-FU exposure with these two treatment options. A total of 37 previously untreated patients with advanced colorectal cancer were randomised to start treatment with either oral UFT 300 mg/m2/day plus oral LV 90 mg/day for 28 days every 5 weeks or i.v. 5-FU 425 mg/m2/day plus LV 20 mg/m2/day for 5 days every 4 weeks. For the second treatment cycle, patients were crossed-over to the alternative treatment regimen. Prior to the first and after the second therapy cycle, patients were required to complete a therapy preference questionnaire (TPQ). The pharmacokinetics of 5-FU were determined by taking blood samples on days 8, 15 or 22 and 28 for UFT and on days 1 and 5 for i.v. 5-FU. 36 patients were eligible. 84% of the patients preferred oral UFT over i.v. 5-FU. After having experienced both treatment modalities, patients indicated taking the medication at home, less stomatitis and diarrhoea, and pill over injection as the most important reasons for their preference. The area under the plasma concentration curve (AUC) for 5-FU after UFT administration was 113 microM x min on day 8, 114 on day 15 and 98 on day 28; the peak levels (Cmax) were 1.2, 1.3 and 1.0 microM, respectively. The AUC for the 5-FU/LV courses was 3083 microM x min for day 1 and 3809 for day 5 (P=0.002). The Cmax was 170.1 and 196.2 microM (P=0.06) and the clearance 2.6 and 1.9 l/min, respectively (P=0.002). Patients with metastatic colorectal cancer clearly preferred oral over i.v. chemotherapy treatment. This choice was most importantly influenced by convenience and toxicity considerations. Although i.v. bolus 5-FU leads to higher peak 5-FU concentrations and AUC values compared with oral UFT, this pharmacokinetic advantage of i.v. 5-FU seems to translate mainly into higher toxicity as seen in large randomised studies comparing oral UFT/LV with i.v. 5-FU/LV. Oral UFT/LV compares favourably with i.v. 5-FU/LV in terms of toxicity and patient's preference and leads to prolonged 5-FU exposure, which is comparable to continuous i.v. 5-FU treatment.

Gemcitabine plus vinorelbine yields better survival outcome than vinorelbine alone in elderly patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. A Southern Italy Cooperative Oncology Group (SICOG) phase III trial

OBJECTIVE

This phase III study was aimed at evaluating whether the addition of gemcitabine (G) to vinorelbine (V) could improve the survival and quality of life (QoL) of elderly patients with advanced NSCLC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with advanced NSCLC, aged >or=70 years, were randomly allocated to receive V 30 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks or G 1200 mg/m(2) plus V 30 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks. Survival was the main end point of the study. The estimated sample size was 120 patients per arm, but an interim analysis of survival was planned on the first 60 patients per arm.

RESULTS

In May 1999, an interim analysis was performed with the survival data of the first 120 eligible patients (V(arm)=60, G+V(arm)=60). Forty-nine patients had stage IIIB disease and 71 patients stage IV disease, median potential follow-up of 14 months (range; 3-22), 93 patients had died (G+V(arm)=41, V(arm)=52). Median survival time (MST) was 29 weeks and projected 1-year survival was 30% in the G+V(arm); these values were 18 weeks and 13% in the V(arm). At multivariate Cox analysis, the risk of death in the G+V(arm) compared with V(arm) was 0.48 (95% C1=0.29-0.79; P<0.01). Combination therapy was also associated with a clear delay in symptom and QoL deterioration. The ORR was 22 and 15% in the G+V and V(arms), respectively. Toxicity was not irrelevant in both arms.

CONCLUSIONS

G+V treatment is associated with a significantly better survival than V alone in elderly NSCLC patients. The magnitude of the difference justifies the early closure of the study. The G+V regimen is now the SICOG reference regimen in this type of patients.

[Prevalence of anemia in oncologic patients treated with chemotherapy. Italian survey at the national level]

In Italy the prevalence of anemia in cancer patients has only been indirectly drawn from clinical studies, and a direct estimation has never been made.

METHODS

This is the first nation-wide survey on the prevalence of anemia in cancer patients in Italy. In 193 Centres, clinical data were collected on consecutive patients with non-myeloid malignancies entering a new cycle of chemotherapy during a reference week in 1997.

RESULTS

A total of 1763 patients has been recruited. At the time of enrollment grade I-II anemia was observed in 56% of patients, although only 1% showed severe anemia. Most of the patients (73%) experienced a decrease of haemoglobin level following treatment completion. Drop of haemoglobin correlated with a more advanced stage of the disease and with a lower performance status at baseline.

CONCLUSION

Anemia is an increasingly common complication in cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy. Improving our knowledge on occurrence of anemia and the type of neoplasms and chemotherapies which are more likely to be associated with this complication may allow the adoption of specific measures to prevent the development of anemia and to avoid the need of blood transfusion in these patients.

Raltitrexed/5-fluorouracil-based combination chemotherapy regimens in anticancer therapy

Preclinical evidence of a schedule-dependent synergism between raltitrexed and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) has prompted clinical studies of this combination. We review the main preclinical and clinical results of raltitrexed/5-FU-based combination chemotherapy regimens in anticancer therapy. Promising results include: response rates of 25 and 23% with combinations of raltitrexed/5-FU/levofolinic acid (LFA) as first-line treatment and oxaliplatin/raltitrexed/5-FU/LFA as second-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer, respectively; and a 67% response rate in a phase I study of cisplatin/raltitrexed/5-FU/LFA as first-line treatment of advanced head and neck cancer, including a 100% response rate at the recommended dose. These combinations were well tolerated, with neutropenia as the main dose-limiting toxicity, allowing the drugs to be combined at the doses used in monotherapy. These results suggest a role for raltitrexed within combination regimens in colorectal cancer therapy, as well as other tumors such as head and neck cancer. A further potential application of raltitrexed in combination therapies is within multidisciplinary chemo-radiotherapy strategies, mainly in rectal cancer. Phase II studies are planned/ongoing to investigate these interesting possibilities.

Gemcitabine/cyclophosphamide/5-fluorouracil/folinic acid triplet combination in anthracycline- and taxane-refractory breast cancer patients: a Southern Italy Cooperative Oncology Group phase I/II study

We sought to define the recommended dose of cyclophosphamide (CTX) for subsequent phase II assessment when combined with fixed doses of gemcitabine (Gemzar; Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN) and 5-fluorouracil/folinic acid in metastatic breast cancer patients previously treated with anthracyclines and taxanes. Patients age 70 or less, with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0 to 2, were enrolled. Patients received gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m(2), 5-fluorouracil 425 mg/m(2), folinic acid 100 mg/m(2), and escalating doses of CTX (in 100-mg/m(2) increments), starting at 500 mg/m(2), on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks. Since March 1999, 46 patients, with a median age of 51 years (range, 38 to 74 years), entered the trial in seven cohorts. Cyclophosphamide dose escalation was stopped at 600 mg/m(2) when three of six patients experienced dose-limiting toxicity (one each with grade 3 thrombocytopenia, grade 3 neutropenia, and persistent grade 2 neutropenia), and then continued with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support. The CTX dose of 800 mg/m(2) was proven safe and was chosen for phase II study. Two complete and 15 partial responses provided an overall response rate of 37% (95% confidence interval, 23% to 51%). Gemcitabine/CTX/5-fluorouracil/folinic acid is well tolerated by metastatic breast cancer patients pretreated with anthracyclines/taxanes, up to a CTX dose of 800 mg/m(2). The phase II study is ongoing. Semin Oncol 28 (suppl 10):50-56.

A weekly regimen of cisplatin, paclitaxel and topotecan with granulocyte-colony stimulating factor support for patients with extensive disease small cell lung cancer: a phase II study

The present study was aimed at defining the antitumour activity of the cisplatin-paclitaxel-topotecan (CPT) weekly administration with G-CSF support in chemo-naive SCLC patients with extensive disease (ED-SCLC). Chemonaive ED-SCLC patients received cisplatin 40 mg/m(2), paclitaxel 85 mg/m(2), and topotecan 2.25 mg/m(2)weekly, with G-CSF (5 microg/kg days 3-5) support, for a maximum of 12 weeks. 37 patients were treated, for a total of 348 cycles delivered. 8 complete responses (22%) and 22 partial responses (59%) were recorded, giving an 81% [95% CI = 65-92%] ORR. At a 13-month (range, 4-26) median follow-up, median progression-free and overall survival were 8 months and 12.5 months, with 1-year and 2-year projected survivals of 55% and 21%, respectively. No toxic deaths occurred. Grade 4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia occurred in 6 and 3 patients, respectively. Only one case of neutropenic sepsis was recorded, while haemorrhagic thrombocytopenia was never observed. Diarrhoea, paraesthesias and fatigue were the main nonhaematologic toxicities being severe in 6, 2 and 10 patients, respectively. The weekly CPT combination with G-CSF support represents a well tolerated therapeutic approach in chemo-naive ED-SCLC patients. The activity rate seems at least similar to that achievable with the standard front-line approaches.

Irinotecan and mitomycin C in 5-fluorouracil-refractory colorectal cancer patients. A phase I/II study of the Southern Italy Cooperative Oncology Group

PURPOSE

To define the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of irinotecan (CPT-11) given on days 1 and 8 with mitomycin C (MMC) given on day 1 in a monthly cycle, and to assess the toxicity and activity of this regimen in patients with previously treated colorectal carcinoma.

METHODS

Fifty-two patients, all pretreated with adjuvant 5-fluorouracil (20 patients) and/or one (35 patients) or two (8 patients) lines of chemotherapy, were entered in this study. Escalating doses of CPT-11 (starting from 150 mg/m2) were administered on days 1 and 8, with escalating doses of MMC (starting from 8 mg/m2) given on day 1, recycling every 28 days. At least 3 patients were treated at each dose level. Escalation proceeded unless 2 out of 3 or 4 out of 6 patients experienced a dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) after the first cycle.

RESULTS

Twelve patients were entered in the phase I study, and 4 consecutive dose levels were tested. At the last dose level (CPT-11 200 mg/m2 plus MMC 10 mg/m2) 4 of 6 patients experienced a DLT (i.e., grade 4 neutropenia in 2 patients and grade 3 diarrhea in 2 patients). Therefore, this dose level was considered as the MTD. Forty patients were treated at the previous dose level (CPT-11, 175 mg/m2 plus MMC 10 mg/m2). One complete, 4 partial, 3 minor responses and 11 cases of stable disease were registered, giving a response rate of 12% [95% confidence interval (CI), 4-27%] and an overall control of tumor growth in 47% (95% CI, 31-64%) of patients. The median time to treatment failure was 6 months (range 1-19+). The median survival time was 14.5 months, and the 1-year and 2-year probability of survival were 56 and 43%. Neutropenia and diarrhea affected 62 and 58% of patients, grade 3 or 4 being registered in 26 and 23% of them, respectively. One episode of neutropenic fever was reported. Other acute toxicities were usually mild and manageable.

CONCLUSIONS

CPT-11 175 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 associated with MMC 10 mg/m2 on day 1, every 4 weeks, is a safe and moderately active regimen in heavily pretreated patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma. The role of MMC in this combination is doubtful, and further attempts with other new agents should be made to improve the outcome in these patients.

Phase I study of mitoxantrone, raltitrexed, levofolinic acid and 5-fluorouracil in advanced solid tumours

PURPOSE

We have recently evaluated the combination of raltitrexed, levofolinic acid (LFA) and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in advanced head and neck and colorectal cancer, and we have shown that this combination is well tolerated and has clinical activity. Clinical combination studies have shown that raltitrexed and anthracyclines can be combined at full doses without unexpected toxicities. Based on these observations, we started a phase I study of mitoxantrone plus raltitrexed administered on day 1, followed by LFA and 5-FU on day 2 in patients with advanced solid tumors.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Mitoxantrone was given at a starting dose of 6 mg/m2, raltitrexed at a fixed dose of 3 mg/m2, LFA at a fixed dose of 250 mg/m2, and 5-FU at a starting dose of 750 mg/m2. Mitoxantrone and 5-FU doses were subsequently escalated alternately up to dose-limiting toxicity. Treatment was repeated every 14 days.

RESULTS

Four dose levels were tested in 18 patients. All three patients treated at the fourth dose level had grade 4 neutropenia after the first cycle. Therefore, this level was defined as the maximum tolerated dose and the dose level immediately below (mitoxantrone 7 mg/m2 and 5-FU 900 mg/m2) was selected for further evaluation. Neutropenia was the main toxic effect. Nonhaematologic side effects were mild. One complete response and five partial responses (all but one in patients with head and neck cancer) were observed, for an overall response rate of 33% (95% confidence interval, 13% to 59%).

CONCLUSIONS

Mitoxantrone, raltitrexed and 5-FU can be combined at doses which are close to those used in monotherapy. The observed activity is encouraging, especially in the subset of patients with head and neck cancer.

Docetaxel and cisplatin in locally advanced or metastatic squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck: a phase II study of the Southern Italy Cooperative Oncology Group (SICOG)

BACKGROUND

Docetaxel is one of the most promising new drugs against squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN), while cisplatin is one of the most active single agents. A phase I study has shown the feasibility of the combination of the two drugs, and activity in SCCHN has been seen.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with locally advanced, inoperable, or metastatic SCCHN, never pretreated with radiotherapy or chemotherapy, received three courses of docetaxel 75 mg/m2 and cisplatin 100 mg/m2, every three weeks. Thereafter, responsive metastatic patients received additional chemotherapy, while patients with locally advanced disease underwent radiation therapy.

RESULTS

Forty-six patients (forty-five with locally advanced, one with metastatic disease) were entered into the study. Ten patients did not complete three courses of chemotherapy because of early death; one patient discontinued treatment after one course. Twenty-one objective responses were observed (46%, 95% confidence interval (CI): 31%-60%), including five complete responses (11%) and sixteen partial responses (35%). Following induction chemotherapy plus radiation therapy, 9 of 21 evaluable patients were rendered disease free, while 8 additional patients had a partial response. After a median follow-up of 18 months, the median duration of response was 12 months, (range 3-25+), and the median overall survival was 11 months. Six early deaths were considered possibly treatment-related (sepsis following grade 4 neutropenia in two cases, hypovolemic shock following severe diarrhea in four cases). Neutropenia was the most severe toxicity (grade 3-4 in 28 patients, median duration 4 days); diarrhea and vomiting were the most troublesome non-haematologic toxicities (grade 4 in 4 and 3 patients, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of docetaxel and cisplatin is active in SCCHN, but toxicity is substantial. This schedule does not appear to offer any advantage compared with conventional regimens.

A phase II study of sequential chemotherapy with docetaxel after the weekly PELF regimen in advanced gastric cancer. A report from the Italian group for the study of digestive tract cancer

In advanced gastric cancer, we investigated feasibility and activity of sequential chemotherapy with docetaxel after an intensive weekly regimen consisting of cisplatin, epidoxorubicin, fluorouracil, leucovorin (PELF) plus filgrastim. Chemotherapy-naive patients with relapsed or metastatic gastric cancer received 8 weekly administrations of chemotherapy with cisplatin 40 mg/m(2), fluorouracil 500 mg/m(2), epidoxorubicin 35 mg/m(2), 6S-stereoisomer of leucovorin 250 mg/m(2) and glutathione 1.5 g/m(2). On the other days filgrastim 5 microg kg(-1) was administered by subcutaneous injection. Subsequently, patients with partial response or stable disease received 3 cycles of docetaxel 100 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks. 40 patients have been enrolled and they are evaluable for response and toxicity. After the PELF regimen, 3 patients achieved complete response, 13 patients showed partial response, 21 patients had stable disease and 3 patients progressed (40% response rate; 95% CI 25% to 55%). After docetaxel, 9 out 34 patients improved the outcome (26.5%); 7 patients with stable disease achieved partial response and 2 patients with partial response achieved complete response. The overall response rate in the 40 patients was 57.5% (95% CI, 42.5% to 72.5%). The PELF regimen did not cause any grade IV toxicity, the most frequent grade III acute side-effects were thrombocytopenia and vomiting which occurred in the 10% of 320 PELF cycles. Docetaxel caused grade III-IV neutropenia and thrombocytopenia in the 10% and the 19% of cycles respectively. Fatigue was a frequent side-effect during both PELF and docetaxel chemotherapy. The sequential application of docetaxel after PELF chemotherapy gained major objective responses with manageable toxicity. This strategy is worth of further investigation in the setting of palliative or neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Cisplatin, dacarbazine, and fotemustine plus interferon alpha in patients with advanced malignant melanoma. A multicenter phase II study of the Italian Cooperative Oncology Group

BACKGROUND

In a previous study, the authors tested the combination of fotemustine (FM) 100 mg/m(2) intravenously (i.v.) on Day 1, dacarbazine (DTIC) 250 mg/m(2) i.v. on Days 2-5, and interferon alpha (IFNalpha) 3 MIU intramuscularly three times per week in 43 patients with advanced melanoma. An overall response rate of 40% and a median survival of 40 weeks were obtained. To evaluate whether the addition of cisplatin (CDDP) to this regimen could improve these results, the authors conducted a preliminary Phase I study and concluded that CDDP 25 mg/m(2) i.v. for 2 days can be combined safely with DTIC, FM, and IFNalpha. Herein, the authors report the results of a Phase II trial with this regimen.

METHODS

From June 1996 to February 1999, 64 patients with metastatic melanoma who were not amenable to surgery were enrolled in this study. Sixty eligible patients (32 males and 28 females; median age, 53 years) were treated with a combination of FM 100 mg/m(2) i.v. on Day 1, DTIC 300 mg/m(2) i.v. on Days 2-4, and CDDP 25 mg/m(2) i.v. on Days 3 and 4 recycled every 3 weeks. IFN alpha2b was administered at a dose of 3 MIU intramuscularly 3 times per week until disease progression.

RESULTS

A total of 189 courses were administered, with a median number of 3 courses per patient (range, 1-8 courses per patient). Eleven complete responses and 12 partial responses were observed, for an overall response rate of 38.3% (95% exact confidence interval, 26.1-51.8%). The median survival was 36 weeks. Neutropenia and thrombocytopenia affected 85% of patients and 68% patients and was World Health Organization Grade 3-4 in 40% and 50%, respectively. The side effects attributable to IFN alpha2b were mild and manageable. The other side effects were moderate and well controlled by supportive therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

The schedule used in this study demonstrated significant activity in patients with advanced, untreated melanoma. The addition of CDDP in the management of the patients in this series seemed to increase significantly both the proportion of patients who achieved a complete response and the probability of long term survival compared with a previous series of patients who were treated by the authors. However, considering the currently available therapies, this regimen does not seem to offer a special advantage in the treatment of patients with this disease. New agents and new protocols are needed.

Biweekly irinotecan or raltitrexed plus 6S-leucovorin and bolus 5-fluorouracil in advanced colorectal carcinoma: a Southern Italy Cooperative Oncology Group phase II-III randomized trial

PURPOSE

The aim of this randomised trial was to evaluate the activity and toxicity of a biweekly regimen including 6S-leucovorin-modulated 5-fluorouracil (LFA-5-FU), combined with either irinotecan (CPT-11 + LFA 5-FU) or raltitrexed (Tomudex) (TOM + LFA-5-FU), in advanced colorectal cancer patients, and to make a preliminary comparison of both these experimental regimens with a biweekly administration of LFA-5-FU modulated by methotrexate (MTX + LFA-5-FU).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

One hundred fifty-nine patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma previously untreated for the metastatic disease (34 of them previously exposed to adjuvant 5-FU) were randomly allocated to receive: CPT-11, 200 mg/m2 i.v. on day 1, followed on day 2 by LFA, 250 mg/m2 i.v. infusion and 5-FU, 850 mg/m2 s i.v. bolus (arm A); TOM, 3 mg/m2 i.v. on day 1, followed on day 2 by LFA, 250 mg/m2 i.v. infusion and 5-FU, 1050 mg/m2 i.v. bolus (arm B); or MTX, 750 mg/m2 i.v. on day 1, followed on day 2 by LFA, 250 mg/m2 i.v. infusion and 5-FU, 800 mg/m2 i.v. bolus (arm C). Courses were repeated every two weeks in all arms of the trial. Response rate (RR) was evaluated after every four courses. The sample size was defined to have an 80% power to detect a 35% RR for each experimental treatment, and to show a difference of at least 4% in RR with the standard treatment if the true difference is 15% or more.

RESULTS

The RRs were: 34% (95% confidence interval (95%, CI): 21%-48%) in arm A, including 3 complete responses (CRs) and 15 partial responses (PRs), 24% (95% CI: 14%-38%) in arm B, including 2 CRs and 11 PRs, and 24% (95% CI: 14%-38%), with 2 CRs and 11 PRs, in arm C. After a median follow-up time of 62 (range 18-108) weeks, the median time to progression was 38, 25, and 27 weeks for arm A, B, and C, respectively. With 94 patients still alive, the one-year probability of survival was 61%, 54%, and 59%, respectively. WHO grade 3 or 4 neutropenia and diarrhoea affected 46% and 16%, respectively, of patients treated with CPT-11 + LFA 5-FU. Median relative dose intensity over eight cycles (DI8) was 78% for CPT-11 and 82% for 5-FU. Severe toxicities of TOM + LFA-5-FU were neutropenia (16%) and diarrhoea (16%), but median relative DI8 was 93% for TOM, and 82% for 5-FU.

CONCLUSIONS

CPT-11 + LFA-5-FU compares favorably in term of activity and toxicity with other combination regimens including CPT-11 and continuous infusional 5-FU. The hypothesis of a RR 15% higher than the MTX + LFA-5-FU treatment can not be ruled out after this interim analysis. The TOM + LFA 5-FU regimen showed a RR and a toxicity profile very close to the MTX + LFA 5-FU combination, and dose not deserve further evaluation in advanced colorectal cancer patients.