1
|
Quagliariello V, Passariello M, Bisceglia I, Paccone A, Inno A, Maurea C, Rapuano Lembo R, Manna L, Iovine M, Canale ML, Scherillo M, Ascierto PA, Gabrielli D, De Lorenzo C, Maurea N. Combinatorial immune checkpoint blockade increases myocardial expression of NLRP-3 and secretion of H-FABP, NT-Pro-BNP, interleukin-1β and interleukin-6: biochemical implications in cardio-immuno-oncology. Front Cardiovasc Med 2024; 11:1232269. [PMID: 38322766 PMCID: PMC10844473 DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1232269] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2023] [Accepted: 01/10/2024] [Indexed: 02/08/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Immune checkpoint blockade in monotherapy or combinatorial regimens with chemotherapy or radiotherapy have become an integral part of oncology in recent years. Monoclonal antibodies against CTLA-4 or PD-1 or PDL-1 are the most studied ICIs in randomized clinical trials, however, more recently, an anti-LAG3 (Lymphocyte activation gene-3) antibody, Relatlimab, has been approved by FDA in combination with Nivolumab for metastatic melanoma therapy. Moreover, Atezolizumab is actually under study in association with Ipilimumab for therapy of metastatic lung cancer. Myocarditis, vasculitis and endothelitis are rarely observed in these patients on monotherapy, however new combination therapies could expose patients to more adverse cardiovascular events. Methods Human cardiomyocytes co-cultured with human peripheral blood lymphocytes (hPBMCs) were exposed to monotherapy and combinatorial ICIs (PD-L1 and CTLA-4 or PD-1 and LAG-3 blocking agents, at 100 nM) for 48 h. After treatments, cardiac cell lysis and secretion of biomarkers of cardiotoxicity (H-FABP, troponin-T, BNP, NT-Pro-BNP), NLRP3-inflammasome and Interleukin 1 and 6 were determined through colorimetric and enzymatic assays. Mitochondrial functions were studied in cardiomyocyte cell lysates through quantification of intracellular Ca++, ATP content and NADH:ubiquinone oxidoreductase core subunit S1 (Ndufs1) levels. Histone deacetylases type 4 (HDAC-4) protein levels were also determined in cardiomyocyte cell lysates to study potential epigenetic changes induced by immunotherapy regimens. Results Both combinations of immune checkpoint inhibitors exert more potent cardiotoxic side effects compared to monotherapies against human cardiac cells co-cultured with human lymphocytes. LDH release from cardiac cells was 43% higher in PD-L1/CTLA-4 blocking agents, and 35.7% higher in PD-1/LAG-3 blocking agents compared to monotherapies. HDAC4 and intracellular Ca++ levels were increased, instead ATP content and Ndufs1 were reduced in myocardial cell lysates (p < 0.001 vs. untreated cells). Troponin-T, BNP, NT-Pro-BNP and H-FABP, were also strongly increased in combination therapy compared to monotherapy regimen. NLRP3 expression, IL-6 and IL-1β levels were also increased by PDL-1/CTLA-4 and PD-1/LAG-3 combined blocking agents compared to untreated cells and monotherapies. Conclusions Data of the present study, although in vitro, indicate that combinatorial immune checkpoint blockade, induce a pro- inflammatory phenotype, thus indicating that these therapies should be closely monitored by the multidisciplinary team consisting of oncologists, cardiologists and immunologists.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- V. Quagliariello
- Division of Cardiology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS-Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, Italy
| | - M. Passariello
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Medical Biotechnology, University of Naples “Federico II”, Naples, Italy
| | - I. Bisceglia
- Servizi Cardiologici Integrati, Dipartimento Cardio-Toraco-Vascolare, Azienda Ospedaliera San Camillo Forlanini, Rome, Italy
| | - A. Paccone
- Division of Cardiology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS-Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, Italy
| | - A. Inno
- Medical Oncology, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Ospedale Sacro Cuore Don Calabria, Negrar, Italy
| | - C. Maurea
- Medical Oncology, Ospedale del Mare, Naples, Italy
| | - R. Rapuano Lembo
- Department of Molecular Medicine, Ceinge-Biotecnologie Avanzate s.c.a.r.l., Naples, Italy
| | - L. Manna
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Medical Biotechnology, University of Naples “Federico II”, Naples, Italy
| | - M. Iovine
- Division of Cardiology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS-Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, Italy
| | - M. L. Canale
- U.O.C. Cardiologia, Ospedale Versilia, Lido di Camaiore (LU), Camaiore, Italy
| | - M. Scherillo
- Cardiologia Interventistica e UTIC, A.O. San Pio, Presidio Ospedaliero Gaetano Rummo, Benevento, Italy
| | - P. A. Ascierto
- Melanoma Cancer Immunotherapy and Innovative Therapy Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione "G. Pascale", Naples, Italy
| | - D. Gabrielli
- U.O.C. Cardiologia, Dipartimento Cardio-Toraco-Vascolare, Azienda Ospedaliera San Camillo Forlanini, Roma – Fondazione per il Tuo Cuore – Heart Care Foundation, Firenze, Italy
| | - C. De Lorenzo
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Medical Biotechnology, University of Naples “Federico II”, Naples, Italy
- Department of Molecular Medicine, Ceinge-Biotecnologie Avanzate s.c.a.r.l., Naples, Italy
| | - N. Maurea
- Division of Cardiology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS-Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Dimitriou F, Namikawa K, Reijers ILM, Buchbinder EI, Soon JA, Zaremba A, Teterycz P, Mooradian MJ, Armstrong E, Nakamura Y, Vitale MG, Tran LE, Bai X, Allayous C, Provent-Roy S, Indini A, Bhave P, Farid M, Kähler KC, Mehmi I, Atkinson V, Klein O, Stonesifer CJ, Zaman F, Haydon A, Carvajal RD, Hamid O, Dummer R, Hauschild A, Carlino MS, Mandala M, Robert C, Lebbe C, Guo J, Johnson DB, Ascierto PA, Shoushtari AN, Sullivan RJ, Cybulska-Stopa B, Rutkowski P, Zimmer L, Sandhu S, Blank CU, Lo SN, Menzies AM, Long GV. Single-agent anti-PD-1 or combined with ipilimumab in patients with mucosal melanoma: an international, retrospective, cohort study. Ann Oncol 2022; 33:968-980. [PMID: 35716907 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2022.06.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2022] [Revised: 05/15/2022] [Accepted: 06/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/01/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mucosal melanoma (MM) is a rare melanoma subtype with distinct biology and poor prognosis. Data on the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is limited. We determined the efficacy of ICIs in MM, analysed by primary site and ethnicity/race. PATIENTS AND METHODS Retrospective cohort study from 25 cancer centres in Australia, Europe, USA and Asia. Patients with histologically confirmed MM were treated with anti-PD1+/-ipilimumab. Primary endpoints were response rate (RR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) by primary site (naso-oral, urogenital, anorectal, other), ethnicity/race (Caucasian, Asian, Other) and treatment. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard model analyses were conducted. RESULTS In total, 545 patients were included: 331 (63%) Caucasian, 176 (33%) Asian and 20 (4%) Other. Primary sites included 113 (21%) anorectal, 178 (32%) urogenital, 206 (38%) naso-oral and 45 (8%) other. 348 (64%) received anti-PD1 and 197 (36%) anti-PD1/ipilimumab. RR, PFS and OS did not differ by primary site, ethnicity/race or treatment. RR for naso-oral was numerically higher for anti-PD1/ipilimumab (40%, 95% CI 29-54%) compared with anti-PD1 (29%, 95% CI 21-37%). 35% of patients that initially responded progressed. Median duration of response (mDOR) was 26 months (95% CI 18-NR [Not Reached]). Factors associated with short PFS were ECOG PS ≥3 (p<0.01), LDH >ULN (p=0.01), lung metastases (p<0.01) and ≥1 previous treatments (p<0.01). Factors associated with short OS were ECOG PS ≥1 (p<0.01), LDH >ULN (p=0.03), lung metastases (p<0.01) and ≥1 previous treatments (p<0.01). CONCLUSIONS MM has poor prognosis. Treatment efficacy of anti-PD1+/-ipilimumab was similar and did not differ by ethnicity/race. Naso-oral primaries had numerically higher response to anti-PD1/ipilimumab, without difference in survival. The addition of ipilimumab did not show greater benefit over anti-PD1 for other primary sites. In responders, mDOR was short and acquired resistance was common. Other factors, including site and number of metastases were associated with survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Dimitriou
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Zurich (USZ) and University of Zurich (UZH), Zurich, Switzerland; Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - K Namikawa
- Department of Dermatologic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - I L M Reijers
- Department of Medical Oncology and Immunology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - E I Buchbinder
- Melanoma Disease Center, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA 02481, USA
| | - J A Soon
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - A Zaremba
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - P Teterycz
- Department of Soft Tissue/Bone Sarcoma and Melanoma, 49585Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
| | - M J Mooradian
- Division of Oncology and Hematology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston MA, USA
| | - E Armstrong
- Department of Medicine, Melanoma Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Y Nakamura
- Department of Skin Oncology/Dermatology, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Saitama, Japan
| | - M G Vitale
- Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione 'G. Pascale', Napoli, Italy
| | - L E Tran
- Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - X Bai
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Melanoma and Sarcoma, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China
| | - C Allayous
- APHP Hôpital Saint-Louis, Dermatology Department, DMU ICARE, Paris, France
| | - S Provent-Roy
- Dermatology Service, Department of Medicine, Gustave Roussy and Paris-Saclay University, Villejuif, France
| | - A Indini
- Unit of Medical Oncology, Ospedale di Circolo e Fondazione Macchi, ASST Sette Laghi, Varese, Italy
| | - P Bhave
- Westmead and Blacktown Hospitals, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - M Farid
- Division of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 11 Hospital Crescent, Singapore, 169610, Singapore
| | - K C Kähler
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Germany
| | - I Mehmi
- Department of Hematology/Oncology, The Angeles Clinic and Research Institute, a Cedars-Sinai Affiliate, 11800 Wilshire Blvd Suite 300, Los Angeles, CA, 90025, USA
| | - V Atkinson
- Princess Alexandra Hospital, Greenslopes Private Hospital, University of Queensland, Queensland, Australia
| | - O Klein
- Department of Medical Oncology, Austin Health, Melbourne, Australia; Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria
| | - C J Stonesifer
- Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York City, New York, USA
| | - F Zaman
- Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - A Haydon
- Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - R D Carvajal
- Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York City, New York, USA
| | - O Hamid
- Department of Hematology/Oncology, The Angeles Clinic and Research Institute, a Cedars-Sinai Affiliate, 11800 Wilshire Blvd Suite 300, Los Angeles, CA, 90025, USA
| | - R Dummer
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Zurich (USZ) and University of Zurich (UZH), Zurich, Switzerland
| | - A Hauschild
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Germany
| | - M S Carlino
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Westmead and Blacktown Hospitals, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - M Mandala
- Unit of Medical Oncology, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | - C Robert
- Dermatology Service, Department of Medicine, Gustave Roussy and Paris-Saclay University, Villejuif, France
| | - C Lebbe
- Université de Paris, APHP Hôpital Saint-Louis, Dermatology Department, DMU ICARE, INSERM U-976, Paris, France
| | - J Guo
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Melanoma and Sarcoma, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China
| | - D B Johnson
- Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - P A Ascierto
- Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione 'G. Pascale', Napoli, Italy
| | - A N Shoushtari
- Department of Medicine, Melanoma Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - R J Sullivan
- Division of Oncology and Hematology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston MA, USA
| | - B Cybulska-Stopa
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Cracow Branch, Poland
| | - P Rutkowski
- Department of Soft Tissue/Bone Sarcoma and Melanoma, 49585Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
| | - L Zimmer
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - S Sandhu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - C U Blank
- Department of Medical Oncology and Immunology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - S N Lo
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - A M Menzies
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Department of Medical Oncology, Royal North Shore and Mater Hospitals, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - G V Long
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Department of Medical Oncology, Royal North Shore and Mater Hospitals, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Conte P, Ascierto PA, Patelli G, Danesi R, Vanzulli A, Sandomenico F, Tarsia P, Cattelan A, Comes A, De Laurentiis M, Falcone A, Regge D, Richeldi L, Siena S. Drug-induced interstitial lung disease during cancer therapies: expert opinion on diagnosis and treatment. ESMO Open 2022; 7:100404. [PMID: 35219244 PMCID: PMC8881716 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2022.100404] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 27.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2021] [Revised: 01/16/2022] [Accepted: 01/18/2022] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Drug-induced interstitial lung disease (DIILD) is a form of interstitial lung disease resulting from exposure to drugs causing inflammation and possibly interstitial fibrosis. Antineoplastic drugs are the primary cause of DIILD, accounting for 23%-51% of cases, with bleomycin, everolimus, erlotinib, trastuzumab-deruxtecan and immune checkpoint inhibitors being the most common causative agents. DIILD can be difficult to identify and manage, and there are currently no specific guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of DIILD caused by anticancer drugs. Objective To develop recommendations for the diagnosis and management of DIILD in cancer patients. Methods Based on the published literature and their clinical expertise, a multidisciplinary group of experts in Italy developed recommendations stratified by DIILD severity, based on the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events. Results The recommendations highlight the importance of multidisciplinary interaction in the diagnosis and management of DIILD. Important components of the diagnostic process are physical examination and careful patient history-taking, measurement of vital signs (particularly respiratory rate and arterial oxygen saturation), relevant laboratory tests, respiratory function testing with spirometry and diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide and computed tomography/imaging. Because the clinical and radiological signs of DIILD are often similar to those of pneumonias or interstitial lung diseases, differential diagnosis is important, including microbial and serological testing to exclude or confirm infectious causes. In most cases, management of DIILD requires the discontinuation of the antineoplastic agent and the administration of short-term steroids. Steroid tapering must be undertaken slowly to prevent reactivation of DIILD. Patients with severe and very severe (grade 3 and 4) DIILD will require hospitalisation and often need oxygen and non-invasive ventilation. Decisions about invasive ventilation should take into account the patient’s cancer prognosis. Conclusions These recommendations provide a structured step-by-step diagnostic and therapeutic approach for each grade of suspected cancer-related DIILD. There is a lack of guidance for the management of DIILD in cancer patients. A multidisciplinary team in Italy developed step-by-step diagnostic and therapeutic guidelines for DIILD in cancer patients. Differential diagnosis of DIILD is critical to exclude other forms of interstitial lung disease or infectious causes. Usually the antineoplastic agent is discontinued, steroids started and further management dictated by DIILD severity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Conte
- DiSCOG, University of Padova and Medical Oncology 2, IOV-Istituto Oncologico Veneto IRCCS, Padua, Italy
| | - P A Ascierto
- Department of Melanoma, Cancer Immunotherapy and Development Therapeutics, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale, Naples, Italy
| | - G Patelli
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy; Department of Hematology, Oncology and Molecular Medicine, Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - R Danesi
- Unit of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacogenetics, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - A Vanzulli
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy; Radiology Department, Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - F Sandomenico
- Radiology Unit, Buon Consiglio Fatebenefratelli Hospital, Naples, Italy
| | - P Tarsia
- Pneumology Unit, Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - A Cattelan
- Tropical and Infectious Diseases Unit, Padua University Hospital, Padua, Italy
| | - A Comes
- Unità Operativa Complessa di Pneumologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - M De Laurentiis
- Department of Breast and Thoracic Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale, Naples, Italy
| | - A Falcone
- Unit of Medical Oncology 2, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, Italy
| | - D Regge
- Department of Radiology, Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, Candiolo, Turin, Italy; Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - L Richeldi
- Unità Operativa Complessa di Pneumologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - S Siena
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy; Department of Hematology, Oncology and Molecular Medicine, Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Abstract
Cutaneous melanoma is the most lethal form of skin cancer and its incidence has been increasing in the past 30 years. Although this is completely resectable in most cases, thicker melanoma and those with regional lymph-node involvement are at a high risk of relapse. In recent years, the management of locoregional disease has drastically changed. In particular, in the 8th Edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC), subgroup classification of TNM (tumor–node–metastasis) has been modified, with the addition of the IIID stage. Furthermore, in recent randomized trials, completion lymph node dissection in case of sentinel lymph node biopsy positivity has not been shown to offer any improvement in overall survival versus observation. Consequently, radical dissection has been recommended as the standard treatment, but only in patients with palpable nodal metastases. However, the major novelty in the treatment of locally advanced melanoma has been the introduction of drugs, already used for metastatic disease, that have also shown clinical efficacy in the adjuvant setting. In fact, immunotherapies and, in the case of BRAF V600E/K-mutated melanoma, combination treatment of BRAF and MEK inhibitors have improved recurrence-free survival in these patients. In this paper, we will describe the current management of a patient with radically resectable melanoma and discuss the key points in light of the latest scientific evidence. Melanoma is the deadliest of skin cancers, although most cases are resectable at diagnosis. Use of targeted therapies and immunotherapies as adjuvant treatment revolutionized the scenario in stage III melanoma. In this review, we summarize all current evidence about locoregional melanoma, including open issues and future directions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Troiani
- Medical Oncology, Department of Precision Medicine, Università degli Studi della Campania 'Luigi Vanvitelli', Napoli, Italy.
| | - V De Falco
- Medical Oncology, Department of Precision Medicine, Università degli Studi della Campania 'Luigi Vanvitelli', Napoli, Italy
| | - S Napolitano
- Medical Oncology, Department of Precision Medicine, Università degli Studi della Campania 'Luigi Vanvitelli', Napoli, Italy
| | - C Trojaniello
- Melanoma, Cancer Immunotherapy and Innovative Therapy Unit, Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale, Napoli, Italy
| | - P A Ascierto
- Melanoma, Cancer Immunotherapy and Innovative Therapy Unit, Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale, Napoli, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Owen CN, Bai X, Quah T, Lo SN, Allayous C, Callaghan S, Martínez-Vila C, Wallace R, Bhave P, Reijers ILM, Thompson N, Vanella V, Gerard CL, Aspeslagh S, Labianca A, Khattak A, Mandala M, Xu W, Neyns B, Michielin O, Blank CU, Welsh SJ, Haydon A, Sandhu S, Mangana J, McQuade JL, Ascierto PA, Zimmer L, Johnson DB, Arance A, Lorigan P, Lebbé C, Carlino MS, Sullivan RJ, Long GV, Menzies AM. Delayed immune-related adverse events with anti-PD-1-based immunotherapy in melanoma. Ann Oncol 2021; 32:917-925. [PMID: 33798657 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2021.03.204] [Citation(s) in RCA: 66] [Impact Index Per Article: 22.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2020] [Revised: 03/09/2021] [Accepted: 03/28/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Immune-related adverse events (irAEs) typically occur within 4 months of starting anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)-based therapy [anti-PD-1 ± anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA4)], but delayed irAEs (onset >12 months after commencement) can also occur. This study describes the incidence, nature and management of delayed irAEs in patients receiving anti-PD-1-based immunotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with delayed irAEs from 20 centres were studied. The incidence of delayed irAEs was estimated as a proportion of melanoma patients treated with anti-PD-1-based therapy and surviving >1 year. Onset, clinical features, management and outcomes of irAEs were examined. RESULTS One hundred and eighteen patients developed a total of 140 delayed irAEs (20 after initial combination with anti-CTLA4), with an estimated incidence of 5.3% (95% confidence interval 4.0-6.9, 53/999 patients at sites with available data). The median onset of delayed irAE was 16 months (range 12-53 months). Eighty-seven patients (74%) were on anti-PD-1 at irAE onset, 15 patients (12%) were <3 months from the last dose and 16 patients (14%) were >3 months from the last dose of anti-PD-1. The most common delayed irAEs were colitis, rash and pneumonitis; 55 of all irAEs (39%) were ≥grade 3. Steroids were required in 80 patients (68%), as well as an additional immunosuppressive agent in 27 patients (23%). There were two irAE-related deaths: encephalitis with onset during anti-PD-1 and a multiple-organ irAE with onset 11 months after ceasing anti-PD-1. Early irAEs (<12 months) had also occurred in 69 patients (58%), affecting a different organ from the delayed irAE in 59 patients (86%). CONCLUSIONS Delayed irAEs occur in a small but relevant subset of patients. Delayed irAEs are often different from previous irAEs, may be high grade and can lead to death. They mostly occur in patients still receiving anti-PD-1. The risk of delayed irAE should be considered when deciding the duration of treatment in responding patients. However, patients who stop treatment may also rarely develop delayed irAE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C N Owen
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - X Bai
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA; Key laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Melanoma, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China
| | - T Quah
- Westmead and Blacktown Hospitals, Sydney, Australia
| | - S N Lo
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - C Allayous
- Dermatology Department, Université de Paris, AP-HP Saint-Louis Hospital, INSERM, Paris, France
| | - S Callaghan
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | | | - R Wallace
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and the University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - P Bhave
- The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
| | - I L M Reijers
- Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - N Thompson
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - V Vanella
- Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale, Napoli, Italy
| | - C L Gerard
- Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - S Aspeslagh
- University Hospital Brussels, Brussels, Belgium
| | - A Labianca
- Papa Giovanni XXIII Cancer Center Hospital, Bergamo, Italy
| | - A Khattak
- Fiona Stanley Hospital and Edith Cowan University, Perth, Australia
| | - M Mandala
- University of Perugia, Unit of Medical Oncology, Santa Maria misericordia hospital, Perugia, Italy
| | - W Xu
- Princess Alexandra Hospital and The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - B Neyns
- University Hospital Brussels, Brussels, Belgium
| | - O Michielin
- Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - C U Blank
- Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - S J Welsh
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - A Haydon
- The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
| | - S Sandhu
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and the University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - J Mangana
- Dermatology, Department of Dermato-Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - J L McQuade
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | - P A Ascierto
- Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale, Napoli, Italy
| | - L Zimmer
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - D B Johnson
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, USA
| | - A Arance
- Hospital Clinic Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - P Lorigan
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK; The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - C Lebbé
- Dermatology Department, Université de Paris, AP-HP Saint-Louis Hospital, INSERM, Paris, France
| | - M S Carlino
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Westmead and Blacktown Hospitals, Sydney, Australia
| | | | - G V Long
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, Australia; Mater Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
| | - A M Menzies
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, Australia; Mater Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Trojaniello C, Vitale MG, Ascierto PA. Checkpoint inhibitor therapy for skin cancer may be safe in patients with asymptomatic COVID-19. Ann Oncol 2021; 32:674-676. [PMID: 33600920 PMCID: PMC7884251 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2021.02.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2021] [Revised: 01/30/2021] [Accepted: 02/07/2021] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- C Trojaniello
- Department Melanoma, Cancer Immunotherapy and Development Therapeutics, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale, Napoli, Italy
| | - M G Vitale
- Department Melanoma, Cancer Immunotherapy and Development Therapeutics, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale, Napoli, Italy
| | - P A Ascierto
- Department Melanoma, Cancer Immunotherapy and Development Therapeutics, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale, Napoli, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ascierto PA, Lewis KD, Di Giacomo AM, Demidov L, Mandalà M, Bondarenko I, Herbert C, Mackiewicz A, Rutkowski P, Guminski A, Simmons B, Ye C, Hooper G, Wongchenko MJ, Goodman GR, Yan Y, Schadendorf D. Prognostic impact of baseline tumour immune infiltrate on disease-free survival in patients with completely resected, BRAF v600 mutation-positive melanoma receiving adjuvant vemurafenib. Ann Oncol 2021; 31:153-159. [PMID: 31912791 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2019.10.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2019] [Revised: 09/11/2019] [Accepted: 10/03/2019] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND We conducted a retrospective exploratory analysis to evaluate the effects of baseline tumour immune infiltrate on disease-free survival (DFS) outcomes in patients with fully resected stage IIC-IIIC melanoma receiving adjuvant vemurafenib monotherapy or placebo in the BRIM8 study. PATIENTS AND METHODS BRIM8 was a phase III, international, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled study. Eligible patients with BRAFV600 mutation-positive, completely resected melanoma were randomly assigned to oral vemurafenib (960 mg twice daily) or matching placebo for 52 weeks. The primary end point was DFS. The association of CD8+ T-cell infiltration and programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression with DFS, as measured by immunohistochemistry, was explored retrospectively. RESULTS Four hundred ninety-eight patients were randomly assigned to receive adjuvant vemurafenib (n = 250) or placebo (n = 248); tumour samples were available for biomarker analysis for approximately 60% of patients. In the pooled biomarker population, placebo-treated patients with <1% CD8+ T cells in the tumour centre had shorter median DFS than those with ≥1% CD8+ T cells (7.7 versus 47.8 months). DFS benefit from vemurafenib versus placebo was greater in patients with <1% CD8+ T cells [hazard ratio (HR) 0.56; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.34-0.92) than in patients with ≥1% CD8+ T cells (HR 0.77; 95% CI 0.48-1.22). Likewise, median DFS was shorter among placebo-treated patients with <5% versus ≥5% PD-L1+ immune cells (IC) in the tumour (7.2 versus 47.8 months). A greater DFS benefit with vemurafenib versus placebo was observed in patients with <5% PD-L1+IC (HR 0.36; 95% CI 0.24-0.56) than in patients with ≥5% PD-L1+IC (HR 0.99; 95% CI 0.58-1.69). CONCLUSIONS The presence of CD8+ T cells and PD-L1+IC are favourable prognostic factors for DFS. Treatment with adjuvant vemurafenib may overcome the poor DFS prognosis associated with low CD8+ T-cell count or PD-L1 expression. CLINICALTRIALS. GOV IDENTIFIER NCT01667419.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P A Ascierto
- Melanoma Unit, Cancer Immunotherapy and Development Therapeutics, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, Italy.
| | - K D Lewis
- Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Comprehensive Cancer Center, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - A M Di Giacomo
- Division of Medical Oncology and Immunotherapy, University Hospital of Siena, Siena, Italy
| | - L Demidov
- Department of Biotherapy, N. N. Blokhin Russian Cancer Research Center, Ministry of Health, Moscow, Russia
| | - M Mandalà
- Department of Oncology and Haematology, Papa Giovanni XXIII Cancer Center Hospital, Bergamo, Italy
| | - I Bondarenko
- Dnipropetrovsk State Medical Academy, Dnipropetrovsk, Ukraine
| | - C Herbert
- Bristol Haematology and Oncology Centre, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - A Mackiewicz
- Department of Cancer Immunology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Med-POLONIA, Poznan, Poland
| | - P Rutkowski
- Department of Soft Tissue/Bone Sarcoma and Melanoma, Maria Sklodowska-Curie Institute - Oncology Center, Warsaw, Poland
| | - A Guminski
- Melanoma Translational Research Group, Melanoma Institute Australia, Wollstonecraft, New South Wales, Australia
| | - B Simmons
- Product Development Oncology, Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, California, USA
| | - C Ye
- Oncology Biostatistics, Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, California, USA
| | - G Hooper
- Clinical Development Department, Roche Products Ltd., Welwyn Garden City, UK
| | - M J Wongchenko
- Oncology Biomarker Development, Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, California, USA
| | - G R Goodman
- Safety Science Oncology, Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Y Yan
- Oncology Biomarker Development, Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, California, USA
| | - D Schadendorf
- Department of Dermatology, Essen University Hospital, Essen, Germany; German Cancer Consortium, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Keilholz U, Ascierto PA, Dummer R, Robert C, Lorigan P, van Akkooi A, Arance A, Blank CU, Chiarion Sileni V, Donia M, Faries MB, Gaudy-Marqueste C, Gogas H, Grob JJ, Guckenberger M, Haanen J, Hayes AJ, Hoeller C, Lebbé C, Lugowska I, Mandalà M, Márquez-Rodas I, Nathan P, Neyns B, Olofsson Bagge R, Puig S, Rutkowski P, Schilling B, Sondak VK, Tawbi H, Testori A, Michielin O. ESMO consensus conference recommendations on the management of metastatic melanoma: under the auspices of the ESMO Guidelines Committee. Ann Oncol 2020; 31:1435-1448. [PMID: 32763453 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.07.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 101] [Impact Index Per Article: 25.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2020] [Revised: 07/08/2020] [Accepted: 07/08/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
The European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) held a consensus conference on melanoma on 5-7 September 2019 in Amsterdam, The Netherlands. The conference included a multidisciplinary panel of 32 leading experts in the management of melanoma. The aim of the conference was to develop recommendations on topics that are not covered in detail in the current ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline and where available evidence is either limited or conflicting. The main topics identified for discussion were (i) the management of locoregional disease; (ii) targeted versus immunotherapies in the adjuvant setting; (iii) targeted versus immunotherapies for the first-line treatment of metastatic melanoma; (iv) when to stop immunotherapy or targeted therapy in the metastatic setting; and (v) systemic versus local treatment for brain metastases. The expert panel was divided into five working groups to each address questions relating to one of the five topics outlined above. Relevant scientific literature was reviewed in advance. Recommendations were developed by the working groups and then presented to the entire panel for further discussion and amendment before voting. This manuscript presents the results relating to the management of metastatic melanoma, including findings from the expert panel discussions, consensus recommendations and a summary of evidence supporting each recommendation. All participants approved the final manuscript.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- U Keilholz
- Charité Comprehensive Cancer Center, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
| | - P A Ascierto
- Melanoma, Cancer Immunotherapy and Development Therapeutics Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale, Napoli, Italy
| | - R Dummer
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - C Robert
- Department of Dermatology, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Paris-Saclay University, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
| | - P Lorigan
- Division of Cancer Sciences, The University of Manchester and The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - A van Akkooi
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - A Arance
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - C U Blank
- Division of Medical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - V Chiarion Sileni
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Oncology, Istituto Oncologico Veneto, IOV-IRCCS, Padova, Italy
| | - M Donia
- National Center for Cancer Immune Therapy, Department of Oncology, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Herlev, Denmark; University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - M B Faries
- Department of Surgery, The Angeles Clinic, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, USA
| | - C Gaudy-Marqueste
- Department of Dermatology and Skin Cancer, Aix Marseille University, Hôpital De La Timone, Marseille, France
| | - H Gogas
- First Department of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, School of Medicine, Athens, Greece
| | - J J Grob
- Department of Dermatology and Skin Cancer, Aix Marseille University, Hôpital De La Timone, Marseille, France
| | - M Guckenberger
- Department of Radio-Oncology, University Hospital Zürich, University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - J Haanen
- Division of Medical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - A J Hayes
- Department of Academic Surgery, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - C Hoeller
- Department of Dermatology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - C Lebbé
- AP-HP Dermatology, Université de Paris, Paris, France; INSERM U976, Hôpital Saint Louis, Paris, France
| | - I Lugowska
- Early Phase Clinical Trials Unit, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
| | - M Mandalà
- Department of Oncology and Haematology, Papa Giovanni XXIII Cancer Center Hospital, Bergamo, Italy
| | - I Márquez-Rodas
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañon, Madrid, Spain
| | - P Nathan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, UK
| | - B Neyns
- Department of Medical Oncology, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | - R Olofsson Bagge
- Sahlgrenska Cancer Center, Department of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden; Department of Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Region Västra Götaland, Sweden; Wallenberg Centre for Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - S Puig
- Dermatology Service, Hospital Clínic of Barcelona and University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer, Barcelona, Spain; CIBER, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Barcelona, Spain
| | - P Rutkowski
- Department of Soft Tissue/Bone Sarcoma and Melanoma, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
| | - B Schilling
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - V K Sondak
- Department of Cutaneous Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, USA
| | - H Tawbi
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | - A Testori
- Department of Dermatology, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
| | - O Michielin
- Department of Oncology, University Hospital Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Michielin O, van Akkooi A, Lorigan P, Ascierto PA, Dummer R, Robert C, Arance A, Blank CU, Chiarion Sileni V, Donia M, Faries MB, Gaudy-Marqueste C, Gogas H, Grob JJ, Guckenberger M, Haanen J, Hayes AJ, Hoeller C, Lebbé C, Lugowska I, Mandalà M, Márquez-Rodas I, Nathan P, Neyns B, Olofsson Bagge R, Puig S, Rutkowski P, Schilling B, Sondak VK, Tawbi H, Testori A, Keilholz U. ESMO consensus conference recommendations on the management of locoregional melanoma: under the auspices of the ESMO Guidelines Committee. Ann Oncol 2020; 31:1449-1461. [PMID: 32763452 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.07.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 63] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2020] [Revised: 07/08/2020] [Accepted: 07/08/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
The European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) held a consensus conference on melanoma on 5-7 September 2019 in Amsterdam, The Netherlands. The conference included a multidisciplinary panel of 32 leading experts in the management of melanoma. The aim of the conference was to develop recommendations on topics that are not covered in detail in the current ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline and where available evidence is either limited or conflicting. The main topics identified for discussion were: (i) the management of locoregional disease; (ii) targeted versus immunotherapies in the adjuvant setting; (iii) targeted versus immunotherapies for the first-line treatment of metastatic melanoma; (iv) when to stop immunotherapy or targeted therapy in the metastatic setting; and (v) systemic versus local treatment of brain metastases. The expert panel was divided into five working groups in order to each address questions relating to one of the five topics outlined above. Relevant scientific literature was reviewed in advance. Recommendations were developed by the working groups and then presented to the entire panel for further discussion and amendment before voting. This manuscript presents the results relating to the management of locoregional melanoma, including findings from the expert panel discussions, consensus recommendations and a summary of evidence supporting each recommendation. All participants approved the final manuscript.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- O Michielin
- Department of Oncology, University Hospital Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
| | - A van Akkooi
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - P Lorigan
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester and The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - P A Ascierto
- Melanoma, Cancer Immunotherapy and Development Therapeutics Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale, Napoli, Italy
| | - R Dummer
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - C Robert
- Department of Medicine, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Paris-Saclay University, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, Paris, France
| | - A Arance
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - C U Blank
- Division of Medical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - V Chiarion Sileni
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Oncology, Istituto Oncologico Veneto, IOV-IRCCS, Padova, Italy
| | - M Donia
- National Center for Cancer Immune Therapy, Department of Oncology, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Herlev, Denmark; University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - M B Faries
- Department of Surgery, The Angeles Clinic, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, USA
| | - C Gaudy-Marqueste
- Department of Dermatology and Skin Cancer, Aix Marseille University, Hôpital Timone, Marseille, France
| | - H Gogas
- First Department of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, School of Medicine, Athens, Greece
| | - J J Grob
- Department of Dermatology and Skin Cancer, Aix Marseille University, Hôpital Timone, Marseille, France
| | - M Guckenberger
- Department of Radio-Oncology, University Hospital Zürich, University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - J Haanen
- Division of Medical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - A J Hayes
- Department of Academic Surgery, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - C Hoeller
- Department of Dermatology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - C Lebbé
- AP-HP Dermatology, Université de Paris, Paris, France; INSERM U976, Hôpital Saint Louis, Paris, France
| | - I Lugowska
- Early Phase Clinical Trials Unit, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
| | - M Mandalà
- Department of Oncology and Haematology, Papa Giovanni XXIII Cancer Center Hospital, Bergamo, Italy
| | - I Márquez-Rodas
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañon, Madrid, Spain
| | - P Nathan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, UK
| | - B Neyns
- Department of Medical Oncology, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | - R Olofsson Bagge
- Sahlgrenska Cancer Center, Department of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden; Department of Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Region Västra Götaland, Sweden; Wallenberg Centre for Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - S Puig
- Dermatology Service, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona and University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August i Pi Sunyer, Barcelona, Spain; CIBERER, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Barcelona, Spain
| | - P Rutkowski
- Department of Soft Tissue/Bone Sarcoma and Melanoma, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
| | - B Schilling
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - V K Sondak
- Department of Cutaneous Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa
| | - H Tawbi
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | - A Testori
- Department of Dermatology, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
| | - U Keilholz
- Charité Comprehensive Cancer Center, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Ronconi G, Piccinni C, Dondi L, Calabria S, Pedrini A, Esposito I, Ascierto PA, Naldi L, Martini N. Identification of cases and estimate of direct costs of unresectable and advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: real-world data from a large Italian database. Br J Dermatol 2020; 183:172-174. [PMID: 31972051 DOI: 10.1111/bjd.18888] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- G Ronconi
- Fondazione ReS (Ricerca e Salute) - Research and Health Foundation, Casalecchio di Reno, Bologna, Italy
| | - C Piccinni
- Fondazione ReS (Ricerca e Salute) - Research and Health Foundation, Casalecchio di Reno, Bologna, Italy
| | - L Dondi
- Fondazione ReS (Ricerca e Salute) - Research and Health Foundation, Casalecchio di Reno, Bologna, Italy
| | - S Calabria
- Fondazione ReS (Ricerca e Salute) - Research and Health Foundation, Casalecchio di Reno, Bologna, Italy
| | - A Pedrini
- Fondazione ReS (Ricerca e Salute) - Research and Health Foundation, Casalecchio di Reno, Bologna, Italy
| | | | - P A Ascierto
- Unit of Melanoma, Cancer Immunotherapy and Development Therapeutics, Istituto Nazionale Tumori - IRCCS - "Fondazione G. Pascale", Napoli, Italy
| | - L Naldi
- Centro Studi GISED, Bergamo, Italy.,Department of Dermatology, San Bortolo Hospital, Vicenza, Italy
| | - N Martini
- Fondazione ReS (Ricerca e Salute) - Research and Health Foundation, Casalecchio di Reno, Bologna, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Michielin O, van Akkooi ACJ, Ascierto PA, Dummer R, Keilholz U. Cutaneous melanoma: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up†. Ann Oncol 2019; 30:1884-1901. [PMID: 31566661 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdz411] [Citation(s) in RCA: 322] [Impact Index Per Article: 64.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- O Michielin
- Department of Oncology, University Hospital Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - A C J van Akkooi
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - P A Ascierto
- Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione "G. Pascale", Napoli, Italy
| | - R Dummer
- Department of Dermatology, Skin Cancer Centre, University Hospital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - U Keilholz
- Charité Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Quagliariello V, Passariello M, Coppola C, Rea D, Barbieri A, Scherillo M, Monti MG, Iaffaioli RV, De Laurentiis M, Ascierto PA, Botti G, De Lorenzo C, Maurea N. Cardiotoxicity and pro-inflammatory effects of the immune checkpoint inhibitor Pembrolizumab associated to Trastuzumab. Int J Cardiol 2019; 292:171-179. [PMID: 31160077 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2019.05.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2019] [Revised: 04/19/2019] [Accepted: 05/13/2019] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The immunotherapy has revolutionized the world of oncology in the last decades with considerable advantages in terms of overall survival in cancer patients. The association of Pembrolizumab and Trastuzumab was recently proposed in clinical trials for the treatment of Trastuzumab-resistant advanced HER2-positive breast cancer. Although immunotherapies are frequently associated with a wide spectrum of immune-related adverse events, the cardiac toxicity has not been properly studied. PURPOSE We studied, for the first time, the putative cardiotoxic and pro-inflammatory effects of Pembrolizumab associated to Trastuzumab. METHODS Cell viability, intracellular calcium quantification and pro-inflammatory studies (analyses of the production of Interleukin 1β, 6 and 8, the expression of NF-kB and Leukotriene B4) were performed in human fetal cardiomyocytes. Preclinical studies were also performed in C57BL6 mice by analyzing fibrosis and inflammation in heart tissues. RESULTS The combination of Pembrolizumab and Trastuzumab leads to an increase of the intracellular calcium overload (of 3 times compared to untreated cells) and to a reduction of the cardiomyocytes viability (of 65 and 20-25%, compared to untreated and Pembrolizumab or Trastuzumab treated cells, respectively) indicating cardiotoxic effects. Notably, combination therapy increases the inflammation of cardiomyocytes by enhancing the expression of NF-kB and Interleukins. Moreover, in preclinical models, the association of Pembrolizumab and Trastuzumab increases the Interleukins expression of 40-50% compared to the single treatments; the expression of NF-kB and Leukotriene B4 was also increased. CONCLUSION Pembrolizumab associated to Trastuzumab leads to strong cardiac pro-inflammatory effects mediated by overexpression of NF-kB and Leukotriene B4 related pathways.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- V Quagliariello
- Division of Cardiology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori- IRCCS- Fondazione G. Pascale, Napoli, Italy
| | - M Passariello
- CEINGE - Biotecnologie Avanzate S.C.a.R.L., Naples, Italy
| | - C Coppola
- Division of Cardiology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori- IRCCS- Fondazione G. Pascale, Napoli, Italy
| | - D Rea
- Animal Facility, Istituto Nazionale Tumori- IRCCS- Fondazione G. Pascale, Napoli, Italy
| | - A Barbieri
- Animal Facility, Istituto Nazionale Tumori- IRCCS- Fondazione G. Pascale, Napoli, Italy
| | - M Scherillo
- Azienda ospedaliera San Pio, Cardiologia Interventistica ed UTIC, Azienda Ospedaliera "G.Rummo" di Benevento, Napoli, Italy
| | - M G Monti
- Department of Translational Medical Sciences, University Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - R V Iaffaioli
- Association for Multidisciplinary Studies in Oncology and Mediterranean Diet, Piazza Nicola Amore, Naples, Italy
| | - M De Laurentiis
- Breast Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori- IRCCS- Fondazione G. Pascale, Napoli, Italy
| | - P A Ascierto
- Melanoma, Cancer Immunotherapy and Development Therapeutics Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori- IRCCS- Fondazione G. Pascale, Napoli, Italy
| | - G Botti
- Scientific Direction, Istituto Nazionale Tumori- IRCCS- Fondazione G. Pascale, Napoli, Italy
| | - C De Lorenzo
- CEINGE - Biotecnologie Avanzate S.C.a.R.L., Naples, Italy; Department of Molecular Medicine and Medical Biotechnology, University of Naples "Federico II", Napoli, Italy.
| | - N Maurea
- Division of Cardiology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori- IRCCS- Fondazione G. Pascale, Napoli, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Botticelli A, Cerbelli B, Pisano A, Naso G, Monti M, Ascierto PA, Costarelli L, Magri V, Mauri M, Pignataro MG, Campagna D, Pernazza A, Nuti M, Fortunato L, Della Rocca C, D'Amati G, Marchetti P. Abstract P5-12-08: Not presented. Cancer Res 2019. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs18-p5-12-08] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
This abstract was not presented at the conference.
Citation Format: Botticelli A, Cerbelli B, Pisano A, Naso G, Monti M, Ascierto PA, Costarelli L, Magri V, Mauri M, Pignataro MG, Campagna D, Pernazza A, Nuti M, Fortunato L, Della Rocca C, D'Amati G, Marchetti P. Not presented [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-12-08.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Botticelli
- Sapienza , University of Rome, Rome, Italy; San Giovanni Addolorata, Hospital, Rome, Italy; Istituto Nazionale Tumori -IRCCS- 'Fondazione G. Pascale', Naples, Italy
| | - B Cerbelli
- Sapienza , University of Rome, Rome, Italy; San Giovanni Addolorata, Hospital, Rome, Italy; Istituto Nazionale Tumori -IRCCS- 'Fondazione G. Pascale', Naples, Italy
| | - A Pisano
- Sapienza , University of Rome, Rome, Italy; San Giovanni Addolorata, Hospital, Rome, Italy; Istituto Nazionale Tumori -IRCCS- 'Fondazione G. Pascale', Naples, Italy
| | - G Naso
- Sapienza , University of Rome, Rome, Italy; San Giovanni Addolorata, Hospital, Rome, Italy; Istituto Nazionale Tumori -IRCCS- 'Fondazione G. Pascale', Naples, Italy
| | - M Monti
- Sapienza , University of Rome, Rome, Italy; San Giovanni Addolorata, Hospital, Rome, Italy; Istituto Nazionale Tumori -IRCCS- 'Fondazione G. Pascale', Naples, Italy
| | - PA Ascierto
- Sapienza , University of Rome, Rome, Italy; San Giovanni Addolorata, Hospital, Rome, Italy; Istituto Nazionale Tumori -IRCCS- 'Fondazione G. Pascale', Naples, Italy
| | - L Costarelli
- Sapienza , University of Rome, Rome, Italy; San Giovanni Addolorata, Hospital, Rome, Italy; Istituto Nazionale Tumori -IRCCS- 'Fondazione G. Pascale', Naples, Italy
| | - V Magri
- Sapienza , University of Rome, Rome, Italy; San Giovanni Addolorata, Hospital, Rome, Italy; Istituto Nazionale Tumori -IRCCS- 'Fondazione G. Pascale', Naples, Italy
| | - M Mauri
- Sapienza , University of Rome, Rome, Italy; San Giovanni Addolorata, Hospital, Rome, Italy; Istituto Nazionale Tumori -IRCCS- 'Fondazione G. Pascale', Naples, Italy
| | - MG Pignataro
- Sapienza , University of Rome, Rome, Italy; San Giovanni Addolorata, Hospital, Rome, Italy; Istituto Nazionale Tumori -IRCCS- 'Fondazione G. Pascale', Naples, Italy
| | - D Campagna
- Sapienza , University of Rome, Rome, Italy; San Giovanni Addolorata, Hospital, Rome, Italy; Istituto Nazionale Tumori -IRCCS- 'Fondazione G. Pascale', Naples, Italy
| | - A Pernazza
- Sapienza , University of Rome, Rome, Italy; San Giovanni Addolorata, Hospital, Rome, Italy; Istituto Nazionale Tumori -IRCCS- 'Fondazione G. Pascale', Naples, Italy
| | - M Nuti
- Sapienza , University of Rome, Rome, Italy; San Giovanni Addolorata, Hospital, Rome, Italy; Istituto Nazionale Tumori -IRCCS- 'Fondazione G. Pascale', Naples, Italy
| | - L Fortunato
- Sapienza , University of Rome, Rome, Italy; San Giovanni Addolorata, Hospital, Rome, Italy; Istituto Nazionale Tumori -IRCCS- 'Fondazione G. Pascale', Naples, Italy
| | - C Della Rocca
- Sapienza , University of Rome, Rome, Italy; San Giovanni Addolorata, Hospital, Rome, Italy; Istituto Nazionale Tumori -IRCCS- 'Fondazione G. Pascale', Naples, Italy
| | - G D'Amati
- Sapienza , University of Rome, Rome, Italy; San Giovanni Addolorata, Hospital, Rome, Italy; Istituto Nazionale Tumori -IRCCS- 'Fondazione G. Pascale', Naples, Italy
| | - P Marchetti
- Sapienza , University of Rome, Rome, Italy; San Giovanni Addolorata, Hospital, Rome, Italy; Istituto Nazionale Tumori -IRCCS- 'Fondazione G. Pascale', Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Marabelle A, Andtbacka R, Harrington K, Melero I, Leidner R, de Baere T, Robert C, Ascierto PA, Baurain JF, Imperiale M, Rahimian S, Tersago D, Klumper E, Hendriks M, Kumar R, Stern M, Öhrling K, Massacesi C, Tchakov I, Tse A, Douillard JY, Tabernero J, Haanen J, Brody J. Starting the fight in the tumor: expert recommendations for the development of human intratumoral immunotherapy (HIT-IT). Ann Oncol 2018; 29:2163-2174. [PMID: 30295695 PMCID: PMC6290929 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdy423] [Citation(s) in RCA: 128] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
A European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO)-sponsored expert meeting was held in Paris on 8 March 2018 which comprised 11 experts from academia, 11 experts from the pharmaceutical industry and 2 clinicians who were representatives of ESMO. The focus of the meeting was exclusively on the intratumoral injection/delivery of immunostimulatory agents with the aim of harmonizing the standard terms and methodologies used in the reporting of human intratumoral immunotherapy (HIT-IT) clinical trials to ensure quality assurance and avoid a blurring of the data reported from different studies. The goal was to provide a reference document, endorsed by the panel members that could provide guidance to clinical investigators, pharmaceutical companies, ethics committees, independent review boards, patient advocates and the regulatory authorities and promote an increase in the number and quality of HIT-IT clinical trials in the future. Particular emphasis was placed not only on the development of precise definitions to facilitate a better understanding between investigators but also on the importance of systematic serial biopsies as a driver for translational research and the need for the recording and reporting of data, to facilitate a better understanding of the key processes involved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Marabelle
- Département d'Innovation Thérapeutique et d'Essais Précoces, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France.
| | - R Andtbacka
- Surgical Oncology Department of Surgery, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, USA
| | - K Harrington
- The Royal Marsden/The Institute of Cancer Research, National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Centre, London, UK
| | - I Melero
- Clinica Universidad de Navarra and CIBERONC, Pamplona, Spain
| | - R Leidner
- Providence Cancer Center, Earle A. Chiles Research Institute, Portland, USA
| | - T de Baere
- Department of Image Guided Therapy, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif
| | - C Robert
- Department of Dermatology, Institute Gustave-Roussy, Paris, France
| | - P A Ascierto
- Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale, Naples, Italy
| | - J-F Baurain
- King Albert II Cancer Institute, Cliniques Universitaires St Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
| | | | | | - D Tersago
- Clinical Development, Bioncotech Therapeutics, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - M Hendriks
- Aduro Biotech, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - R Kumar
- MedImmune, LLC, Gaithersburg, USA
| | | | | | - C Massacesi
- Global Product Development Oncology, Pfizer, USA
| | | | - A Tse
- Oncology Early Development, Merck & Co., Inc, Kenilworth, USA
| | | | - J Tabernero
- Medical Oncology Department, Vall d' Hebron University Hospital, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain
| | - J Haanen
- Division of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J Brody
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Ascierto PA, Marabelle A. How do immune checkpoint-targeted antibodies work? The need for improved pharmacokinetic evaluation in early phase studies. Ann Oncol 2018; 29:2157-2160. [PMID: 30307539 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdy420] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- P A Ascierto
- Unit of Melanoma, Cancer Immunotherapy and Development Therapeutics, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale, Napoli, Italic.
| | - A Marabelle
- Département d'Innovation Thérapeutique et d'Essais Précoces, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif; INSERM U1015, Villejuif, France
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Chapman PB, Robert C, Larkin J, Haanen JB, Ribas A, Hogg D, Hamid O, Ascierto PA, Testori A, Lorigan PC, Dummer R, Sosman JA, Flaherty KT, Chang I, Coleman S, Caro I, Hauschild A, McArthur GA. Vemurafenib in patients with BRAFV600 mutation-positive metastatic melanoma: final overall survival results of the randomized BRIM-3 study. Ann Oncol 2018; 28:2581-2587. [PMID: 28961848 PMCID: PMC5834156 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdx339] [Citation(s) in RCA: 157] [Impact Index Per Article: 26.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The BRIM-3 trial showed improved progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) for vemurafenib compared with dacarbazine in treatment-naive patients with BRAFV600 mutation-positive metastatic melanoma. We present final OS data from BRIM-3. Patients and methods Patients were randomly assigned in a 1 : 1 ratio to receive vemurafenib (960 mg twice daily) or dacarbazine (1000 mg/m2 every 3 weeks). OS and PFS were co-primary end points. OS was assessed in the intention-to-treat population, with and without censoring of data for dacarbazine patients who crossed over to vemurafenib. Results Between 4 January 2010 and 16 December 2010, a total of 675 patients were randomized to vemurafenib (n = 337) or dacarbazine (n = 338, of whom 84 crossed over to vemurafenib). At the time of database lock (14 August 2015), median OS, censored at crossover, was significantly longer for vemurafenib than for dacarbazine {13.6 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 12.0-15.4] versus 9.7 months [95% CI 7.9-12.8; hazard ratio (HR) 0.81 [95% CI 0.67-0.98]; P = 0.03}, as was median OS without censoring at crossover [13.6 months (95% CI 12.0-15.4) versus 10.3 months (95% CI 9.1-12.8); HR 0.81 (95% CI 0.68-0.96); P = 0.01]. Kaplan-Meier estimates of OS rates for vemurafenib versus dacarbazine were 56% versus 46%, 30% versus 24%, 21% versus 19% and 17% versus 16% at 1, 2, 3 and 4 years, respectively. Overall, 173 of the 338 patients (51%) in the dacarbazine arm and 175 of the 337 (52%) of those in the vemurafenib arm received subsequent anticancer therapies, most commonly ipilimumab. Safety data were consistent with the primary analysis. Conclusions Vemurafenib continues to be associated with improved median OS in the BRIM-3 trial after extended follow-up. OS curves converged after ≈3 years, likely as a result of crossover from dacarbazine to vemurafenib and receipt of subsequent anticancer therapies. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01006980.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P B Chapman
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA.
| | - C Robert
- Department of Medicine, Institut Gustave Roussy and Paris Sud University, Paris, France
| | - J Larkin
- Department of Medicine, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - J B Haanen
- Division of Medical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - A Ribas
- Department of Medicine, Hematology and Oncology, Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center at the University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA
| | - D Hogg
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Hospital and University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - O Hamid
- The Angeles Clinic and Research Institute, Melanoma Therapeutics, Los Angeles, USA
| | - P A Ascierto
- Melanoma, Cancer Immunotherapy and Innovative Therapy Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples
| | - A Testori
- Melanoma and Sarcoma, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, Milan, Italy
| | - P C Lorigan
- Department of Medical Oncology, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - R Dummer
- Department of Dermatology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - J A Sosman
- Department of Hematology/Oncology, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University, Chicago, USA
| | - K T Flaherty
- Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA
| | - I Chang
- Department of Biostatistics in Product Development, Biometrics, South San Francisco, USA
| | - S Coleman
- Clinical Department, Oncology, Genentech Inc., South San Francisco, USA
| | - I Caro
- Product Development, Oncology, Genentech Inc., South San Francisco, USA
| | - A Hauschild
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany
| | - G A McArthur
- Department of Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, East Melbourne, Australia; Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Helgadottir H, Kis L, Ljungman P, Larkin J, Kefford R, Ascierto PA, Hansson J, Masucci G. Lethal aplastic anemia caused by dual immune checkpoint blockade in metastatic melanoma. Ann Oncol 2018; 28:1672-1673. [PMID: 28407116 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdx177] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2017] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- H Helgadottir
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital
| | - L Kis
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital
| | - P Ljungman
- Departments of Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation and Hematology, Karolinska University Hospital.,Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine Huddinge, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - J Larkin
- Melanoma Unit, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London.,Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK
| | - R Kefford
- Westmead Hospital, Melanoma Institute Australia and Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
| | - P A Ascierto
- Melanoma, Cancer Immunotherapy and Innovative Therapies Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori di Napoli Fondazione "G. Pascale", Naples, Italy
| | - J Hansson
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital
| | - G Masucci
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Cavalieri S, Perrone F, Miceli R, Ascierto PA, Locati LD, Bergamini C, Granata R, Alfieri S, Resteghini C, Galbiati D, Busico A, Paielli N, Patuzzo R, Maurichi A, Gallino G, Ruggeri R, Mariani L, Palla M, Licitra L, Bossi P. Efficacy and safety of single-agent pan-human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER) inhibitor dacomitinib in locally advanced unresectable or metastatic skin squamous cell cancer. Eur J Cancer 2018; 97:7-15. [PMID: 29734047 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2018.04.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2017] [Revised: 12/07/2017] [Accepted: 04/05/2018] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In recurrent or metastatic (R/M) skin squamous cell cancer (sSCC) not amenable to radiotherapy (RT) or surgery, chemotherapy (CT) has a palliative intent and limited clinical responses. The role of oral pan-HER inhibitor dacomitinib in this setting was investigated within a clinical trial. METHODS Patients with diagnosis of R/M sSCC were treated. Dacomitinib was started at a dose of 30 mg daily (QD) for 15 d, followed by 45 mg QD. Primary end-point was response rate (RR). Tumour samples were analysed through next-generation sequencing using a custom panel targeting 36 genes associated with sSCC. RESULTS Forty-two patients (33 men; median age 77 years) were treated. Most (86%) received previous treatments consisting in surgery (86%), RT (50%) and CT (14%). RR was 28% (2% complete response; 26% partial response), disease control rate was 86%. Median progression-free survival and overall survival were 6 and 11 months, respectively. Most patients (93%) experienced at least one adverse event (AE): diarrhoea, skin rash (71% each), fatigue (36%) and mucositis (31%); AEs grade 3-4 occurred in 36% of pts. In 16% of cases, treatment was discontinued because of drug-related toxicity. TP53, NOTCH1/2, KMT2C/D, FAT1 and HER4 were the most frequently mutated genes. BRAF, NRAS and HRAS mutations were more frequent in non-responders, and KMT2C and CASP8 mutations were restricted to this subgroup. CONCLUSIONS In sSCC, dacomitinib showed activity similar to what was observed with anti-epidermal growth factor receptor agents, and durable clinical benefit was observed. Safety profile was comparable to previous experiences in other cancers. Molecular pt selection could improve therapeutic ratio.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Cavalieri
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Medical Oncology/Head and Neck Unit, Milan, Italy
| | - F Perrone
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Department of Pathology, Unit of Experimental Molecular Pathology, Milan, Italy
| | - R Miceli
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Clinical Epidemiology and Trial Organization, Milan, Italy
| | - P A Ascierto
- Istituto Nazionale Tumori Fondazione "G. Pascale", Unit of Melanoma, Cancer Immunotherapy and Innovative Therapy, Naples, Italy
| | - L D Locati
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Medical Oncology/Head and Neck Unit, Milan, Italy
| | - C Bergamini
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Medical Oncology/Head and Neck Unit, Milan, Italy
| | - R Granata
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Medical Oncology/Head and Neck Unit, Milan, Italy
| | - S Alfieri
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Medical Oncology/Head and Neck Unit, Milan, Italy
| | - C Resteghini
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Medical Oncology/Head and Neck Unit, Milan, Italy
| | - D Galbiati
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Medical Oncology/Head and Neck Unit, Milan, Italy
| | - A Busico
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Department of Pathology, Unit of Experimental Molecular Pathology, Milan, Italy
| | - N Paielli
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Department of Pathology, Unit of Experimental Molecular Pathology, Milan, Italy
| | - R Patuzzo
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Melanoma and Sarcoma Surgery Unit, Milan, Italy
| | - A Maurichi
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Melanoma and Sarcoma Surgery Unit, Milan, Italy
| | - G Gallino
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Melanoma and Sarcoma Surgery Unit, Milan, Italy
| | - R Ruggeri
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Melanoma and Sarcoma Surgery Unit, Milan, Italy
| | - L Mariani
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Clinical Epidemiology and Trial Organization, Milan, Italy
| | - M Palla
- Istituto Nazionale Tumori Fondazione "G. Pascale", Unit of Melanoma, Cancer Immunotherapy and Innovative Therapy, Naples, Italy
| | - L Licitra
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Medical Oncology/Head and Neck Unit, Milan, Italy; Università Degli Studi di Milano, Medical Oncology Department, Milan, Italy
| | - P Bossi
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Medical Oncology/Head and Neck Unit, Milan, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Caracò C, Chiofalo MG, Niro J, Ascierto PA, Botti G, Lastoria S, Mozzillo N. Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy to Stage Patients with Cutaneous Melanoma at the National Cancer Institute of Naples. Results from 240 Sentinel Node Biopsies. Tumori 2018; 88:S12-3. [PMID: 12365370 DOI: 10.1177/030089160208800324] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Aimsand background The presence of lymph node metastases in patients with cutaneous melanoma represents the basis for correct therapy planning and is the most powerful prognostic factor to evaluate overall survival at diagnosis. Methods and Study Design Since 1992, when Dr Morton published his first experience, the sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy technique seems to have resolved this matter by correctly staging patients. We analyzed our data from 240 SLN biopsies performed in the last five years at the National Cancer Institute of Naples, evaluating the total identification rate and the nodal recurrence rate, and compared them with the preliminary data of the MSLT (melanoma sentinel lymph node trial). Results Of all SLNs evaluated 18.5% were micrometastatic and 14% were identified by immunohistochemical staining. Forty-one patients had metastatic SLNs and nodal dissection of the positive basins revealed no other tumor-positive lymph nodes in more than 80% of them. All patients with a Breslow thickness of less than 2 mm had micrometastases only in the SLN, while with increasing thickness two, three or more positive nodes were found. Among SLN-negative patients nine (4%) developed lymph node recurrence in the previously treated basin and were therefore considered as false negative SLN biopsies. Conclusions The prognostic value of SLN biopsy needs to be confirmed by the final results of the MSLT evaluating the therapeutic use of this procedure in patients with a Breslow thickness of less than 2 mm and its possible impact on the course of the disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Caracò
- Surgical Division B, National Cancer Institute, Naples, Italy.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Dréno B, Ribas A, Larkin J, Ascierto PA, Hauschild A, Thomas L, Grob JJ, Koralek DO, Rooney I, Hsu JJ, McKenna EF, McArthur GA. Incidence, course, and management of toxicities associated with cobimetinib in combination with vemurafenib in the coBRIM study. Ann Oncol 2018; 28:1137-1144. [PMID: 28444112 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdx040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 63] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background In the coBRIM phase III trial, the addition of cobimetinib, an MEK inhibitor, to vemurafenib, a BRAF inhibitor, significantly improved progression-free survival [hazard ratio (HR), 0.58; P < 0.0001] and overall survival (HR, 0.70; P = 0.005) in advanced BRAF-mutated melanoma. Here, we report on the incidence, course, and management of key adverse events (AEs) in the coBRIM study. Patients and methods Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive vemurafenib (960 mg twice a day) and either cobimetinib (60 mg once a day, 21 days on/7 days off) or placebo. In addition to standard safety evaluations, patients underwent regular ophthalmic, cardiac, and dermatologic surveillance examinations. Results Of 495 patients recruited to the study, 493 patients received treatment and constituted the safety population (cobimetinib combined with vemurafenib, 247; vemurafenib, 246). At data cut-off (30 September 2015), median follow-up was 18.5 months. Nearly every patient experienced an AE. In patients who received cobimetinib combined with vemurafenib, the frequency of grade ≥3 AEs was higher than in patients who received vemurafenib alone (75% versus 61%). Most AEs, including grade ≥3 AEs, occurred within the first treatment cycle. After the first cycle (28 days), the incidence of common AEs (rash, diarrhoea, photosensitivity, elevated creatine phosphokinase, serous retinopathy, pyrexia, and liver laboratory abnormalities) decreased substantially over time. Most AEs were managed conservatively by supportive care measures, dose modifications of study treatment, and, occasionally, permanent treatment discontinuation. Conclusions These data indicate that most AEs arising from treatment with cobimetinib combined with vemurafenib generally occur early in the treatment course, are mild or moderate and are manageable by patient monitoring, dose modification and supportive care. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01689519.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B Dréno
- Department of Dermato Cancerology, Nantes University, Nantes, France
| | - A Ribas
- Department of Medicine, Hematology/Oncology, Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, The University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA
| | - J Larkin
- Department of Medicine, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - P A Ascierto
- Unit of Melanoma, Cancer Immunotherapy and Innovative Therapy, Istituto Nazionale Tumori Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, Italy
| | - A Hauschild
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany
| | - L Thomas
- Department of Dermatology, Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Lyon 1 University, Lyons Cancer Research Center, France
| | - J-J Grob
- Dermatology and Cutaneous Oncology, Aix-Marseille University Hôpital de la Timone AP-HM, Marseille, France
| | - D O Koralek
- Department of Clinical Development, Genentech Inc., South San Francisco, USA
| | - I Rooney
- Product Development Oncology, Genentech Inc., South San Francisco, USA
| | - J J Hsu
- Biostatistics, Genentech Inc., South San Francisco, USA
| | - E F McKenna
- Medical Affairs, Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, USA
| | - G A McArthur
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Basset-Séguin N, Hauschild A, Kunstfeld R, Grob J, Dréno B, Mortier L, Ascierto PA, Licitra L, Dutriaux C, Thomas L, Meyer N, Guillot B, Dummer R, Arenberger P, Fife K, Raimundo A, Dika E, Dimier N, Fittipaldo A, Xynos I, Hansson J. Vismodegib in patients with advanced basal cell carcinoma: Primary analysis of STEVIE, an international, open-label trial. Eur J Cancer 2017; 86:334-348. [PMID: 29073584 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2017.08.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 185] [Impact Index Per Article: 26.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2017] [Revised: 07/04/2017] [Accepted: 08/28/2017] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The SafeTy Events in VIsmodEgib study (STEVIE, ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01367665), assessed safety and efficacy of vismodegib-a first-in-class Hedgehog pathway inhibitor demonstrating clinical benefit in advanced basal cell carcinoma (BCC)-in a patient population representative of clinical practice. Primary analysis data are presented. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with locally advanced or metastatic BCC received oral vismodegib 150 mg/d until progressive disease, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal. Primary objective was safety. Efficacy variables were assessed as secondary end-points. RESULTS Evaluable adult patients (N = 1215, 1119 locally advanced; 96 metastatic BCC) from 36 countries were treated; 147 patients (12%) remained on study at time of reporting. Median (range) treatment duration was 8.6 (0-44) months. Most patients (98%) had ≥1 treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE). The incidence of the most common TEAEs was consistent with reports in previous analyses. No association between creatine phosphokinase (CPK) abnormalities and muscle spasm was observed. Serious TEAEs occurred in 289 patients (23.8%). Exposure ≥12 months did not lead to increased incidence or severity of new TEAEs. The majority of the most common TEAEs ongoing at time of treatment discontinuation resolved by 12 months afterwards, regardless of Gorlin syndrome status. Response rates (investigator-assessed) in patients with histologically confirmed measurable baseline disease were 68.5% (95% confidence interval (CI) 65.7-71.3) in patients with locally advanced BCC and 36.9% (95% CI 26.6-48.1) in patients with metastatic BCC. CONCLUSIONS The primary analysis of STEVIE demonstrates that vismodegib is tolerable in typical patients in clinical practice; safety profile is consistent with that in previous reports. Long-term exposure was not associated with worsening severity/frequency of TEAEs. Investigator-assessed response rates showed high rate of tumour control. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV: NCT01367665.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N Basset-Séguin
- Department of Dermatology, Hôpital Saint Louis, 1 Avenue Claude Vellefaux, 75475, Paris, France.
| | - A Hauschild
- Department of Dermatology, University of Kiel, Rosalind-Franklin-Str 7, D-24105, Kiel, Germany.
| | - R Kunstfeld
- University Dermatology Clinic, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, A-1090, Vienna, Austria.
| | - J Grob
- Dermatology and Oncology Service, Aix Marseille University and Timone Hospital, 264 Rue St. Pierre, 13385, Cedex 05 Marseille, France.
| | - B Dréno
- Department of Dermato Oncology, University Hospital Nantes, Hotel Dieu, Place Alexis Ricordeau, 44093, Cedex 01 Nantes, France.
| | - L Mortier
- Dermatology Service, University of Lille 2, Lille Regional University Hospital, Hôpital Huriez, 2 Avenue Oscar Lambret, 59037, Lille, France.
| | - P A Ascierto
- Melanoma, Cancer Immunotherapy and Innovative Therapy Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori Fondazione Pascale, Via Mariano Semmola, 80131, Naples, Italy.
| | - L Licitra
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, and University of Milan, Via Giacomo Venezian 1, 20133, Italy.
| | - C Dutriaux
- Dermatology Service, University Hospital of Bordeaux, 1 Rue Jean Burguet, 33075, Bordeaux, France.
| | - L Thomas
- Dermatology Service, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Lyon, Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, 69495, Pierre Bénite, Lyon, France.
| | - N Meyer
- Skin Cancer Unit, Paul Sabatier University and Toulouse University Cancer Institute, 24 Chemin de Pouvourville TSA30030, 31059, Toulouse, France.
| | - B Guillot
- Dermatology Department, University Hospital of Montpellier, 80 Avenue Augustin Fliche, 34090, Montpellier, France.
| | - R Dummer
- Dermatology Department, University Hospital Zurich, Gloriastr. 31, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.
| | - P Arenberger
- Dermatology Department, Charles University Third Faculty of Medicine, Šrobárova 1150/50, 100 34, Praha 10, Prague, Czech Republic.
| | - K Fife
- Oncology Centre, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 2OQ, UK.
| | - A Raimundo
- Oncology Department, Instituto Portugues de Oncologia, R. Dr. António Bernardino de Almeida, 4200-072, Porto, Portugal.
| | - E Dika
- Dermatology, Department of Diagnostic, Experimental and Specialty Medicine, University of Bologna, Via Massarenti 1, 40138, Bologna, Italy.
| | - N Dimier
- Roche Products Ltd., 6 Falcon Way, Shire Park, Welwyn Garden City, Hertfordshire, AL7 1TW, UK.
| | - A Fittipaldo
- Roche Products Ltd., 6 Falcon Way, Shire Park, Welwyn Garden City, Hertfordshire, AL7 1TW, UK.
| | - I Xynos
- Roche Products Ltd., 6 Falcon Way, Shire Park, Welwyn Garden City, Hertfordshire, AL7 1TW, UK.
| | - J Hansson
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska University Hospital, Hospital Solma, 171 76, Stockholm, Sweden.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Saiag P, Gutzmer R, Ascierto PA, Maio M, Grob JJ, Murawa P, Dreno B, Ross M, Weber J, Hauschild A, Rutkowski P, Testori A, Levchenko E, Enk A, Misery L, Vanden Abeele C, Vojtek I, Peeters O, Brichard VG, Therasse P. Prospective assessment of a gene signature potentially predictive of clinical benefit in metastatic melanoma patients following MAGE-A3 immunotherapeutic (PREDICT). Ann Oncol 2016; 27:1947-53. [PMID: 27502712 PMCID: PMC5035794 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdw291] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2016] [Revised: 05/26/2016] [Accepted: 07/20/2016] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Genomic profiling of tumor tissue may aid in identifying predictive or prognostic gene signatures (GS) in some cancers. Retrospective gene expression profiling of melanoma and non-small-cell lung cancer led to the characterization of a GS associated with clinical benefit, including improved overall survival (OS), following immunization with the MAGE-A3 immunotherapeutic. The goal of the present study was to prospectively evaluate the predictive value of the previously characterized GS. PATIENTS AND METHODS An open-label prospective phase II trial ('PREDICT') in patients with MAGE-A3-positive unresectable stage IIIB-C/IV-M1a melanoma. RESULTS Of 123 subjects who received the MAGE-A3 immunotherapeutic, 71 (58.7%) displayed the predictive GS (GS+). The 1-year OS rate was 83.1%/83.3% in the GS+/GS- populations. The rate of progression-free survival at 12 months was 5.8%/4.1% in GS+/GS- patients. The median time-to-treatment failure was 2.7/2.4 months (GS+/GS-). There was one complete response (GS-) and two partial responses (GS+). The MAGE-A3 immunotherapeutic was similarly immunogenic in both populations and had a clinically acceptable safety profile. CONCLUSION Treatment of patients with MAGE-A3-positive unresectable stage IIIB-C/IV-M1a melanoma with the MAGE-A3 immunotherapeutic demonstrated an overall 1-year OS rate of 83.5%. GS- and GS+ patients had similar 1-year OS rates, indicating that in this study, GS was not predictive of outcome. Unexpectedly, the objective response rate was lower in this study than in other studies carried out in the same setting with the MAGE-A3 immunotherapeutic. Investigation of a GS to predict clinical benefit to adjuvant MAGE-A3 immunotherapeutic treatment is ongoing in another melanoma study.This study is registered at www.clinicatrials.gov NCT00942162.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Saiag
- General Dermatology and Oncology Service, Ambroise-Paré Hospital, AP-HP, University of Versailles-Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Boulogne, France
| | - R Gutzmer
- Skin Cancer Center Hannover, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - P A Ascierto
- National Institute for Tumors Foundation 'G. Pascale', Napoli
| | - M Maio
- Medical Oncology and Immunotherapy, Department of Oncology, University Hospital of Siena, Istituto Toscano Tumori, Siena, Italy
| | - J-J Grob
- Department of Dermatology and Skin Cancers, La Timone APHM Hospital, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France
| | - P Murawa
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Poznań University of Medical Sciences, Poznań, Poland
| | - B Dreno
- Dermatology Clinic, Hôtel-Dieu Hospital, CHU Nantes, Nantes, France
| | - M Ross
- Department of Surgical Oncology, UTMD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - J Weber
- Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, USA
| | - A Hauschild
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany
| | - P Rutkowski
- Department of Soft Tissue/Bone Sarcoma and Melanoma, Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Center and Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
| | - A Testori
- Melanoma and Soft Tissue Sarcoma Division, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | - E Levchenko
- Petrov Research Institute of Oncology, St Petersburg, Russian Federation
| | - A Enk
- Department of Dermatology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - L Misery
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital of Brest, Brest, France
| | | | - I Vojtek
- GSK Vaccines, Rixensart, Belgium
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Galon J, Fox BA, Bifulco CB, Masucci G, Rau T, Botti G, Marincola FM, Ciliberto G, Pages F, Ascierto PA, Capone M. Immunoscore and Immunoprofiling in cancer: an update from the melanoma and immunotherapy bridge 2015. J Transl Med 2016; 14:273. [PMID: 27650038 PMCID: PMC5029056 DOI: 10.1186/s12967-016-1029-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 112] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2016] [Accepted: 09/06/2016] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
The fifth "Melanoma Bridge Meeting" took place in Naples, December 1-5th, 2015. The main topics discussed at this meeting were: Molecular and Immuno advances, Immunotherapies and Combination Therapies, Tumor Microenvironment and Biomarkers and Immunoscore. The natural history of cancer involves interactions between the tumor and the immune system of the host. The immune infiltration at the tumor site may be indicative of host response. Significant correlations were shown between the levels of immune cell infiltration in tumors and patient's clinical outcome. Moreover, incredible progress comes from the discovery of mutation-encoded tumor neoantigens. In fact, as tumors grow, they acquire mutations that are able to influence the response of patients to immune checkpoint inhibitors. It has been demonstrated that sensitivity to PD-1 and CTLA-4 blockade in patients with advanced NSCLC and melanoma was enhanced in tumors enriched for clonal neoantigens. The road ahead is still very long, but the knowledge of the mechanisms of immune escape, the study of tumor neo-antigens as well as of tumor microenvironment and the development of new immunotherapy strategies, will make cancer a more and more treatable disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Galon
- Laboratory of Integrative Cancer Immunology, INSERM UMRS1138 Cordeliers Research Center, University Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris 6, 15 Rue de l'Ecole de Medecine, 75006, Paris, France.,University Paris Descartes, 45 Rue Saints Pères, 75006, Paris, France
| | - B A Fox
- Robert W. Franz Cancer Research Center, Earle A. Chiles Research Institute, Providence Cancer Center, Providence Portland Medical Center, Portland, OR, 97213, USA.,Department of Molecular Microbiology & Immunology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, 97239, USA
| | - C B Bifulco
- Department of Pathology, Providence Portland Medical Center, Portland, OR, 97213, USA
| | - G Masucci
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, The Karolinska Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - T Rau
- Institute of Pathology, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - G Botti
- Unit of Pathology, IRCCS, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Fondazione "G. Pascale", Naples, Italy
| | | | - G Ciliberto
- IRCCS, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Fondazione "G. Pascale",Scentific Directorate, Naples, Italy
| | - F Pages
- University Paris Descartes, 45 Rue Saints Pères, 75006, Paris, France.,Laboratory of Integrative Cancer Immunology, INSERM UMRS1138, Cordeliers Research Center, 15 Rue de l'Ecole de Medecine, 75006, Paris, France.,Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers, University Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris 6, 15 Rue de l'Ecole de Medecine, 75006, Paris, France.,Immunomonitoring Platform, Laboratory of Immunology, Georges Pompidou European Hospital, 20-40 Rue Leblanc, 75015, Paris, France
| | - P A Ascierto
- Unit of Melanoma, Cancer Immunotherapy and Innovative Therapy, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Fondazione "G. Pascale", Naples, Italy
| | - M Capone
- Unit of Melanoma, Cancer Immunotherapy and Innovative Therapy, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Fondazione "G. Pascale", Naples, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Gutzmer R, Rivoltini L, Levchenko E, Testori A, Utikal J, Ascierto PA, Demidov L, Grob JJ, Ridolfi R, Schadendorf D, Queirolo P, Santoro A, Loquai C, Dreno B, Hauschild A, Schultz E, Lesimple TP, Vanhoutte N, Salaun B, Gillet M, Jarnjak S, De Sousa Alves PM, Louahed J, Brichard VG, Lehmann FF. Safety and immunogenicity of the PRAME cancer immunotherapeutic in metastatic melanoma: results of a phase I dose escalation study. ESMO Open 2016; 1:e000068. [PMID: 27843625 PMCID: PMC5070281 DOI: 10.1136/esmoopen-2016-000068] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2016] [Accepted: 04/22/2016] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose The PRAME tumour antigen is expressed in several tumour types but in few normal adult tissues. A dose-escalation phase I/II study (NCT01149343) assessed the safety, immunogenicity and clinical activity of the PRAME immunotherapeutic (recombinant PRAME protein (recPRAME) with the AS15 immunostimulant) in patients with advanced melanoma. Here, we report the phase I dose-escalation study segment. Patients and methods Patients with stage IV PRAME-positive melanoma were enrolled to 3 consecutive cohorts to receive up to 24 intramuscular injections of the PRAME immunotherapeutic. The RecPRAME dose was 20, 100 or 500 µg in cohorts 1, 2 and 3, respectively, with a fixed dose of AS15. Adverse events (AEs), including predefined dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) and the anti-PRAME humoral response (ELISA), were coprimary end points. Cellular immune responses were evaluated using in vitro assays. Results 66 patients were treated (20, 24 and 22 in the respective cohorts). AEs considered by the investigator to be causally related were mostly grade 1 or 2 injection site symptoms, fatigue, chills, fever and headache. Two DLTs (grade 3 brain oedema and proteinuria) were recorded in two patients in two cohorts (cohorts 2 and 3). All patients had detectable anti-PRAME antibodies after four immunisations. Percentages of patients with predefined PRAME-specific-CD4+T-cell responses after four immunisations were similar in each cohort. No CD8+ T-cell responses were detected. Conclusions The PRAME immunotherapeutic had an acceptable safety profile and induced similar anti-PRAME-specific humoral and cellular immune responses in all cohorts. As per protocol, the phase II study segment was initiated to further evaluate the 500 µg PRAME immunotherapeutic dose. Trial registration number NCT01149343, Results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Gutzmer
- Skin Cancer Center Hannover , Hannover Medical School , Hannover , Germany
| | - L Rivoltini
- Unit of Immunotherapy of Human Tumors , Fondazione RCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori , Milan , Italy
| | - E Levchenko
- Petrov Research Institute of Oncology , St. Petersburg , Russia
| | - A Testori
- Istituto Europeo Di Oncologia , Milano , Italy
| | - J Utikal
- Skin Cancer Unit, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Medical Center Mannheim, Ruprecht-Karl University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
| | - P A Ascierto
- Melanoma, Cancer Immunotherapy and Innovative Therapies Unit , Istituto Nazionale Tumori Fondazione Pascale , Naples , Italy
| | - L Demidov
- Cancer Research Center , Moscow , Russia
| | - J J Grob
- Aix Marseille University Hôpital de la Timone, Service de Dermatologie , Marseille , France
| | - R Ridolfi
- Immunotherapy Unit , Romagna Cancer Institute IRST- IRCCS , Meldola , Italy
| | - D Schadendorf
- Department of Dermatology , University Hospital Essen , Essen , Germany
| | - P Queirolo
- Istituto Nazionale per la Ricerca sul Cancro Oncologia Medica , Genova , Italy
| | - A Santoro
- Humanitas Cancer Center, Istituto Clinico Humanitas IRCCS , Rozzano , Italy
| | - C Loquai
- Department of Dermatology , University of Mainz , Mainz , Germany
| | - B Dreno
- Dermatology Clinic , Hôpital Hôtel-Dieu, CHU Nantes , Nantes , France
| | - A Hauschild
- Department of Dermatology , Skin Cancer Center, Schleswig-Holstein University Hospital , Kiel , Germany
| | - E Schultz
- Department of Dermatology , Paracelsus Medical University, Klinikum Nuremberg , Nuremberg , Germany
| | - T P Lesimple
- Département d'Oncologie Médicale , Centre Eugène Marquis , Rennes , France
| | | | - B Salaun
- GSK Vaccines , Rixensart , Belgium
| | - M Gillet
- GSK Vaccines , Rixensart , Belgium
| | | | - P M De Sousa Alves
- GSK Vaccines, Rixensart, Belgium; Celyad, Mont-Saint-Guibert, Rixensart, Belgium
| | | | - V G Brichard
- GSK Vaccines, Rixensart, Belgium; Vianova-Biosciences, Lasne, Belgium
| | - F F Lehmann
- GSK Vaccines, Rixensart, Belgium; Celyad, Mont-Saint-Guibert, Rixensart, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Long GV, Atkinson V, Ascierto PA, Robert C, Hassel JC, Rutkowski P, Savage KJ, Taylor F, Coon C, Gilloteau I, Dastani HB, Waxman IM, Abernethy AP. Effect of nivolumab on health-related quality of life in patients with treatment-naïve advanced melanoma: results from the phase III CheckMate 066 study. Ann Oncol 2016; 27:1940-6. [PMID: 27405322 PMCID: PMC5035785 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdw265] [Citation(s) in RCA: 85] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2016] [Accepted: 06/29/2016] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
In patients with advanced melanoma in the CheckMate 066 study, baseline health-related quality of life (HRQoL) with nivolumab was maintained over time, with statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvements in some exploratory analyses, and no HRQoL improvements with dacarbazine. Added to the survival benefit of nivolumab, the benefit-to-risk ratio favors nivolumab over dacarbazine. Background Nivolumab has shown significant survival benefit and a favorable safety profile compared with dacarbazine chemotherapy among treatment-naïve patients with metastatic melanoma in the CheckMate 066 phase III study. Results from the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) analyses from CheckMate 066 are presented. Patients and methods HRQoL was evaluated at baseline and every 6 weeks while on treatment using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Care (EORTC) Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30) and the EuroQoL Five Dimensions Questionnaire (EQ-5D). Via a multi-step statistical plan, data were analyzed descriptively, cross-sectionally, and longitudinally, adjusting for baseline covariates, in patients having baseline plus ≥1 post-baseline assessment. Results Baseline-adjusted completion rates for all HRQoL questionnaires across treatment arms were 65% and 70% for dacarbazine and nivolumab, respectively, and remained similar throughout treatment. The mean baseline HRQoL scores were similar for patients treated with nivolumab and dacarbazine. Baseline HRQoL levels with nivolumab were maintained over time. This exploratory analysis showed a between-arm difference in favor of nivolumab on the EQ-5D utility index and clinically meaningful EQ-5D improvements from baseline at several time points for patients receiving nivolumab. Patients treated with nivolumab did not show increased symptom burden as assessed by the EORTC QLQ-C30. No HRQoL change was noted with dacarbazine patients up to week 43, although the high attrition rate after week 13 did not allow any meaningful analyses. Patients receiving nivolumab deteriorated significantly later than those receiving dacarbazine on several EORTC QLQ-C30 scales and the EQ-5D utility index. Conclusions In addition to prolonged survival, these exploratory HRQoL results show that nivolumab maintains baseline HRQoL levels to provide long-term quality of survival benefit, compared with dacarbazine in patients with advanced melanoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G V Long
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, and Mater Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - V Atkinson
- Gallipoli Medical Research Foundation and Princess Alexandra Hospital, Greenslopes, Australia
| | - P A Ascierto
- Istituto Nazionale Tumori Fondazione Pascale, Napoli, Italy
| | | | - J C Hassel
- University Hospital Heidelberg and National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - P Rutkowski
- Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center and Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
| | - K J Savage
- BC Cancer Agency, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | | | - C Coon
- Adelphi Values, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | | | - I M Waxman
- Bristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
De Divitiis C, von Arx C, Grimaldi AM, Cicala D, Tatangelo F, Arcella A, Romano GM, Simeone E, Iaffaioli RV, Ascierto PA, Tafuto S. Metronomic temozolomide as second line treatment for metastatic poorly differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine carcinoma. J Transl Med 2016; 14:113. [PMID: 27142424 PMCID: PMC4855772 DOI: 10.1186/s12967-016-0857-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2015] [Accepted: 04/10/2016] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Neuroendocrine Neoplasms (NEN) are a group of heterogeneous malignancies derived from neuroendocrine cell compartment, with different roles in both endocrine and nervous system. Most NETs have gastroentero-pancreatic (GEP) origin, arising in the foregut, midgut, or hindgut. The 2010 WHO classification divides GEP-NETs into two main subgroups, neuroendocrine tumors (NET) and neuroendocrine carcinomas (NEC), according with Ki-67 levels. NET are tumors with low (<20 %) Ki-67 value, and NECs, including small cell lung carcinomas and Merkel Cell carcinomas, are all NETs with high Ki-67 levels (>20 %–G3). Poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas (NEC) are usually treated with cisplatin-based chemotherapy regimens. Here we present a case of a patient with pancreatic NEC progressing after cisplatin and etoposide, treated with temozolomide as palliative, second line treatment. According with the poor Performance Status (PS = 2) and to reduce the toxicity of the treatment was chosen an intermittent dosing regimen of metronomic temozolomide (75 mg/m2/day—one-week-on/on-week-off). MGMT resulted methylated. On July 2014 the patient started the treatment. On August 2014 the patient obtained a significant clinical benefit (PS = 0) and the total body CT scan performed on October 2014 showed a RECIST partial response on all the sites of disease. No drug-related side effects were reported by the patient. After 18 months of therapy the treatment continues without significant toxicity, and with further remission of the metastases. Treatment with metronomic “one-week-on/on-week-off” Temozolomide can be considered a good treatment option in patients with poor performance status, affected by pNEC with MGMT methylation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C De Divitiis
- Department of Abdominal Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, IRCCS-Fondazione "G. Pascale", Naples, Italy
| | - C von Arx
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - A M Grimaldi
- Melanoma, Cancer Immunotherapy, and Innovative Therapy Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, IRCCS-Fondazione "G. Pascale", Naples, Italy
| | - D Cicala
- Unit of Interventional Neuroradiology, Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, "Federico II" University, Naples, Italy
| | - F Tatangelo
- Department of Diagnostic Pathology and Laboratory, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, IRCCS-Fondazione "G. Pascale", Naples, Italy
| | - A Arcella
- IRCCS Neuromed, Località Camerelle, Pozzilli-Isernia, Italy
| | - G M Romano
- Department of Abdominal Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, IRCCS-Fondazione "G. Pascale", Naples, Italy
| | - E Simeone
- Melanoma, Cancer Immunotherapy, and Innovative Therapy Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, IRCCS-Fondazione "G. Pascale", Naples, Italy
| | - R V Iaffaioli
- Department of Abdominal Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, IRCCS-Fondazione "G. Pascale", Naples, Italy
| | - P A Ascierto
- Melanoma, Cancer Immunotherapy, and Innovative Therapy Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, IRCCS-Fondazione "G. Pascale", Naples, Italy
| | - S Tafuto
- Department of Abdominal Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, IRCCS-Fondazione "G. Pascale", Naples, Italy.
| | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Chiarion-Sileni V, Pigozzo J, Ascierto PA, Simeone E, Maio M, Calabrò L, Marchetti P, De Galitiis F, Testori A, Ferrucci PF, Queirolo P, Spagnolo F, Quaglino P, Carnevale Schianca F, Mandalà M, Di Guardo L, Del Vecchio M. Ipilimumab retreatment in patients with pretreated advanced melanoma: the expanded access programme in Italy. Br J Cancer 2014; 110:1721-6. [PMID: 24619072 PMCID: PMC3974075 DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2014.126] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2013] [Revised: 02/14/2014] [Accepted: 02/17/2014] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Retreatment with ipilimumab has been shown to re-establish disease control in some patients with disease progression. Here, we report the efficacy and safety of retreatment with ipilimumab 3 mg kg(-1) among patients participating in an expanded access programme in Italy. METHODS Patients who achieved disease control during induction therapy were retreated with ipilimumab upon progression (3 mg kg(-1) every 3 weeks for up to four doses), providing they had not experienced toxicity that precluded further dosing. Tumour assessments were conducted after retreatment, and patients were monitored throughout for adverse events. RESULTS Of 855 patients treated with ipilimumab, 51 were retreated upon disease progression. Of these, 28 (55%) regained disease control upon retreatment and 42% were alive 2 years after the first induction dose of ipilimumab; median overall survival was 21 months. Eleven patients (22%) had a treatment-related adverse event of any grade during retreatment. These were generally mild-to-moderate and resolved within a median of 4 days. No new types of toxicity were reported. CONCLUSIONS For patients who meet predefined criteria, retreatment with ipilimumab is generally well tolerated and can translate into clinical benefit. This strategy should be compared with other therapeutic options in randomised controlled trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- V Chiarion-Sileni
- Melanoma Cancer Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, Via Gattamelata, 64, 35128 Padua, Italy
| | - J Pigozzo
- Melanoma Cancer Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, Via Gattamelata, 64, 35128 Padua, Italy
| | - P A Ascierto
- Melanoma, Cancer Immunotherapy and Innovative Therapy Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori Fondazione 'G Pascale', Via Cappella dei Cangiani, 1, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - E Simeone
- Melanoma, Cancer Immunotherapy and Innovative Therapy Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori Fondazione 'G Pascale', Via Cappella dei Cangiani, 1, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - M Maio
- Medical Oncology and Immunotherapy Unit, University Hospital of Siena, Istituto Toscano Tumori, Strada delle Scotte, 14, 53100 Siena, Italy
| | - L Calabrò
- Medical Oncology and Immunotherapy Unit, University Hospital of Siena, Istituto Toscano Tumori, Strada delle Scotte, 14, 53100 Siena, Italy
| | - P Marchetti
- 1] Medical Oncology, Dermopathic Institute of the Immaculate IDI-IRCCS, Via dei Monti di Creta, 104, 00167 Rome, Italy [2] Medical Oncology, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Via di Grottarossa, 1035-39, 00189 Rome, Italy
| | - F De Galitiis
- Medical Oncology, Dermopathic Institute of the Immaculate IDI-IRCCS, Via dei Monti di Creta, 104, 00167 Rome, Italy
| | - A Testori
- Divisione Melanoma, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, Via Ripamonti, 435, 20141 Milan, Italy
| | - P F Ferrucci
- Oncology of Melanoma Unit, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, Via Ripamonti, 435, 20141 Milan, Italy
| | - P Queirolo
- Department of Medical Oncology A, San Martino Hospital, National Institute for Cancer Research, L.go R. Benzi, 10, 16132 Genoa, Italy
| | - F Spagnolo
- Department of Medical Oncology A, San Martino Hospital, National Institute for Cancer Research, L.go R. Benzi, 10, 16132 Genoa, Italy
| | - P Quaglino
- Dermatologic Clinic, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Torino, San Giovanni Battista di Torino, Via Cherasco, 23, 10126 Turin, Italy
| | - F Carnevale Schianca
- Division of Medical Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research and Treatment, IRCC, Piedmont Oncology Foundation, Strada Provinciale, 142, 10060 Candiolo, Italy
| | - M Mandalà
- Unit of Medical Oncology, Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital, Piazza OMS-Organizzazione Mondiale della Sanità, 1, 24127 Bergamo, Italy
| | - L Di Guardo
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Via Venezian, 1, 20133 Milan, Italy
| | - M Del Vecchio
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Via Venezian, 1, 20133 Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Maio M, Danielli R, Chiarion-Sileni V, Pigozzo J, Parmiani G, Ridolfi R, De Rosa F, Del Vecchio M, Di Guardo L, Queirolo P, Picasso V, Marchetti P, De Galitiis F, Mandalà M, Guida M, Simeone E, Ascierto PA. Efficacy and safety of ipilimumab in patients with pre-treated, uveal melanoma. Ann Oncol 2013; 24:2911-5. [PMID: 24067719 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdt376] [Citation(s) in RCA: 110] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with advanced uveal melanoma have a poor prognosis and limited treatment options. Ipilimumab is approved for pre-treated adult patients with advanced melanoma. However, because previous clinical trials with ipilimumab have excluded patients with uveal melanoma, data in this patient population are limited. PATIENTS AND METHODS Pre-treated patients with advanced uveal melanoma received ipilimumab 3 mg/kg through an expanded access programme, every 3 weeks for four doses. Tumour assessments were conducted at baseline and after completion of treatment and patients were monitored throughout for adverse events. RESULTS Among 82 assessable patients, 4 (5%) had an immune-related objective response and 24 (29%) had immune-related stable disease lasting ≥3 months for an immune-related disease control rate of 34%. With a median follow-up of 5.6 months, median overall survival (OS) was 6.0 months and median progression-free survival (PFS) was 3.6 months. The 1-year rates of OS and PFS were 31% and 11%, respectively. The safety profile of ipilimumab was similar to that in patients with cutaneous melanoma. CONCLUSIONS These data suggest ipilimumab 3 mg/kg is a feasible option in pre-treated patients with metastatic uveal melanoma. Evidence of disease control and a 1-year survival rate of 31% indicate the need for further investigation in randomised, controlled trials to determine the optimal timing and use of ipilimumab in this patient population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Maio
- Medical Oncology and Immunotherapy, Department of Oncology, University Hospital of Siena, Tuscan Cancer Institute, Siena
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Queirolo P, Morabito A, Laurent S, Lastraioli S, Piccioli P, Ascierto PA, Gentilcore G, Serra M, Marasco A, Tornari E, Dozin B, Pistillo MP. Association of CTLA-4 polymorphisms with improved overall survival in melanoma patients treated with CTLA-4 blockade: a pilot study. Cancer Invest 2013; 31:336-45. [PMID: 23641913 DOI: 10.3109/07357907.2013.793699] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
CTLA-4 blockade with monoclonal antibodies can lead to cancer regression in patients with metastatic melanoma (MM). CTLA-4 gene polymorphisms may influence the response to anti-CTLA-4 antibodies although few data are available regarding this issue. We analyzed six CTLA-4 single nucleotide polymorphisms (-1661A > G, -1577G > A, -658C > T, -319C > T, +49A > G, and CT60G > A) in 14 Italian MM patients and 45 healthy subjects. We found a significant association between the -1577G/A and CT60G/A genotypes and improved overall survival (Pc < 0.006, Bonferroni corrected), further confirmed by the diplotype analysis (-1577 & CT60 GG-AA diplotype, p < 0.001). A positive trend toward an association between these genotypes and response to therapy was also observed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Queirolo
- UOC Oncologia Medica A, IRCCS A.O.U. San Martino-IST, Genova, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Chapman PB, Hauschild A, Robert C, Larkin JMG, Haanen JBAG, Ribas A, Hogg D, O'Day S, Ascierto PA, Testori A, Lorigan P, Dummer R, Sosman JA, Garbe C, Lee RJ, Nolop KB, Nelson B, Hou J, Flaherty KT, McArthur GA. Phase III randomized, open-label, multicenter trial (BRIM3) comparing BRAF inhibitor vemurafenib with dacarbazine (DTIC) in patients with V600EBRAF-mutated melanoma. J Clin Oncol 2011. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2011.29.18_suppl.lba4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
LBA4 Background: About 50% of melanomas have an activating V600EBRAF mutation which led to the hypothesis that inhibition of the mutated BRAF kinase may be of clinical benefit. Phase I and II trials with vemurafenib (previously PLX4032/RO5185426), an orally available inhibitor of oncogenic BRAF kinase, showed response rates (RR; CR+PR) >50% in V600EBRAF- mutated melanoma patients (pts). We conducted a phase III trial to determine if vemurafenib improved overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in melanoma pts with V600EBRAF mutation. Methods: Pts with previously untreated, unresectable stage IIIC or stage IV melanoma that tested positive for V600EBRAF mutation by the cobas 4800 BRAF V600 Mutation Test were randomized (1:1) to vemurafenib (960 mg po bid) or DTIC (1,000 mg/m2, IV, q3w). Randomization was stratified by PS, stage, LDH, and geographic region. Pts were assessed for tumor responses after weeks 6, 12, and then q9 weeks. Co-primary endpoints were OS and PFS on the intent-to-treat population; secondary endpoints included RR, response duration, and safety. Final analysis was planned at 196 deaths. Results: 675 pts were enrolled at 103 centers worldwide between Jan and Dec 2010. Treatment cohorts were well-balanced. At the pre-planned interim analysis (50% of deaths needed for final analysis), the hazard ratios for OS and PFS were 0.37 (95% CI 0.26 to 0.55; p<0.0001) and 0.26 (95% CI 0.20 to 0.33; p<0.0001), respectively, both in favor of vemurafenib. The confirmed RR was 48.4% and 5.5% to vemurafenib and DTIC, respectively, among the 65% of pts evaluable for RR to date. Benefit in OS, PFS, and RR was seen in all subgroups examined. Due to these data, the DTIC cohort has been allowed to cross over to vemurafenib. At the time of data analysis, 66% of vemurafenib pts and 25% DTIC pts were still on treatment. The most common toxicities of vemurafenib were: diarrhea, rash, alopecia, photosensitivity, fatigue, arthralgia, and keratoacanthoma/skin squamous cell carcinoma. Conclusions: Vemurafenib is associated with significantly improved OS and PFS compared to DTIC in pts with previously untreated, V600EBRAF-mutated metastatic melanoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P. B. Chapman
- Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Universitaetsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel Schleswig-Holstein, Germany; Cancer Institute Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Urology Unit, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, United Kingdom; The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Department of Medical Oncology, Princess Margaret Hospital and University of
| | - A. Hauschild
- Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Universitaetsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel Schleswig-Holstein, Germany; Cancer Institute Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Urology Unit, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, United Kingdom; The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Department of Medical Oncology, Princess Margaret Hospital and University of
| | - C. Robert
- Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Universitaetsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel Schleswig-Holstein, Germany; Cancer Institute Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Urology Unit, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, United Kingdom; The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Department of Medical Oncology, Princess Margaret Hospital and University of
| | - J. M. G. Larkin
- Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Universitaetsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel Schleswig-Holstein, Germany; Cancer Institute Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Urology Unit, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, United Kingdom; The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Department of Medical Oncology, Princess Margaret Hospital and University of
| | - J. B. A. G. Haanen
- Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Universitaetsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel Schleswig-Holstein, Germany; Cancer Institute Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Urology Unit, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, United Kingdom; The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Department of Medical Oncology, Princess Margaret Hospital and University of
| | - A. Ribas
- Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Universitaetsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel Schleswig-Holstein, Germany; Cancer Institute Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Urology Unit, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, United Kingdom; The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Department of Medical Oncology, Princess Margaret Hospital and University of
| | - D. Hogg
- Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Universitaetsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel Schleswig-Holstein, Germany; Cancer Institute Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Urology Unit, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, United Kingdom; The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Department of Medical Oncology, Princess Margaret Hospital and University of
| | - S. O'Day
- Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Universitaetsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel Schleswig-Holstein, Germany; Cancer Institute Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Urology Unit, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, United Kingdom; The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Department of Medical Oncology, Princess Margaret Hospital and University of
| | - P. A. Ascierto
- Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Universitaetsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel Schleswig-Holstein, Germany; Cancer Institute Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Urology Unit, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, United Kingdom; The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Department of Medical Oncology, Princess Margaret Hospital and University of
| | - A. Testori
- Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Universitaetsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel Schleswig-Holstein, Germany; Cancer Institute Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Urology Unit, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, United Kingdom; The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Department of Medical Oncology, Princess Margaret Hospital and University of
| | - P. Lorigan
- Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Universitaetsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel Schleswig-Holstein, Germany; Cancer Institute Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Urology Unit, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, United Kingdom; The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Department of Medical Oncology, Princess Margaret Hospital and University of
| | - R. Dummer
- Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Universitaetsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel Schleswig-Holstein, Germany; Cancer Institute Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Urology Unit, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, United Kingdom; The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Department of Medical Oncology, Princess Margaret Hospital and University of
| | - J. A. Sosman
- Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Universitaetsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel Schleswig-Holstein, Germany; Cancer Institute Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Urology Unit, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, United Kingdom; The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Department of Medical Oncology, Princess Margaret Hospital and University of
| | - C. Garbe
- Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Universitaetsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel Schleswig-Holstein, Germany; Cancer Institute Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Urology Unit, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, United Kingdom; The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Department of Medical Oncology, Princess Margaret Hospital and University of
| | - R. J. Lee
- Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Universitaetsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel Schleswig-Holstein, Germany; Cancer Institute Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Urology Unit, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, United Kingdom; The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Department of Medical Oncology, Princess Margaret Hospital and University of
| | - K. B. Nolop
- Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Universitaetsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel Schleswig-Holstein, Germany; Cancer Institute Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Urology Unit, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, United Kingdom; The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Department of Medical Oncology, Princess Margaret Hospital and University of
| | - B. Nelson
- Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Universitaetsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel Schleswig-Holstein, Germany; Cancer Institute Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Urology Unit, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, United Kingdom; The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Department of Medical Oncology, Princess Margaret Hospital and University of
| | - J. Hou
- Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Universitaetsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel Schleswig-Holstein, Germany; Cancer Institute Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Urology Unit, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, United Kingdom; The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Department of Medical Oncology, Princess Margaret Hospital and University of
| | - K. T. Flaherty
- Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Universitaetsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel Schleswig-Holstein, Germany; Cancer Institute Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Urology Unit, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, United Kingdom; The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Department of Medical Oncology, Princess Margaret Hospital and University of
| | - G. A. McArthur
- Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Universitaetsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel Schleswig-Holstein, Germany; Cancer Institute Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Urology Unit, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, United Kingdom; The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Department of Medical Oncology, Princess Margaret Hospital and University of
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Queirolo P, Morabito A, Piccioli P, Lastraioli S, Callegari S, Camoriano M, Ascierto PA, Laurent S, Dozin B, Pistillo MP. Analysis of CTLA-4 gene polymorphisms in patients with advanced melanoma treated with anti-CTLA-4 therapy. J Clin Oncol 2011. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2011.29.15_suppl.8588] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
|
32
|
Chapman PB, Hauschild A, Robert C, Larkin JMG, Haanen JBAG, Ribas A, Hogg D, O'Day S, Ascierto PA, Testori A, Lorigan P, Dummer R, Sosman JA, Garbe C, Lee RJ, Nolop KB, Nelson B, Hou J, Flaherty KT, McArthur GA. Phase III randomized, open-label, multicenter trial (BRIM3) comparing BRAF inhibitor RG7204 with dacarbazine in patients with V600E BRAF-mutated melanomas. J Clin Oncol 2011. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2011.29.15_suppl.lba4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
|
33
|
Petrini M, Ridolfi L, Fiammenghi L, Napolitano M, Granato AM, Ancarani V, Pancisi E, Guidoboni M, Nicoletti S, Valmorri L, Riccobon A, Migliori G, Venanzi FM, Ascierto PA, Ridolfi R. Dendritic cell (DC) vaccination with low dose temozolomide phase I/II trial in melanoma patients: Preliminary data on peripheral blood regulatory t-cells (Treg) and DC-TEM8 expression modulations. J Clin Oncol 2011. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2011.29.15_suppl.e13029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
|
34
|
Colombino M, Capone M, Maio M, De Giorgi V, Cossu A, Lissia A, Rubino C, Massidda B, Staibano S, Nappi O, Botti G, Caraco C, Mozzillo N, Manca A, Sini M, Ascierto PA, Palmieri G. Mutation frequency in BRAF and NRAS genes among primary tumors and different types of metastasis from melanoma patients. J Clin Oncol 2011. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2011.29.15_suppl.8574] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
|
35
|
Di Giacomo AM, Ascierto PA, Fonsatti E, Pittiglio E, Queirolo P, Pilla L, Ridolfi R, Santinami M, Testori A, Parmiani G, Maio M. A phase II study combining ipilimumab and fotemustine in patients with metastatic melanoma: The NIBIT-M1 trial. J Clin Oncol 2011. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2011.29.15_suppl.tps230] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
|
36
|
Ridolfi L, Fiammenghi L, Petrini M, Granato A, Ancarani V, Pancisi E, Guidoboni M, Riccobon A, Ascierto PA, Ridolfi R. Low-dose temozolomide modulation of peripheral blood regulatory T cells before dendritic cell-based vaccination in metastatic melanoma: Phase I/II study. J Clin Oncol 2010. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2010.28.15_suppl.tps311] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
|
37
|
Eggermont AM, Suciu S, Rutkowski P, Marsden J, Testori A, Corrie P, Aamdal S, Ascierto PA, Patel P, Spatz A. Randomized phase III trial comparing postoperative adjuvant ganglioside GM2-KLH/QS-21 vaccination versus observation in stage II (T3-T4N0M0) melanoma: Final results of study EORTC 18961. J Clin Oncol 2010. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2010.28.15_suppl.8505] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
|
38
|
Palmieri G, Casula M, Budroni M, Cossu A, Tanda F, Ascierto PA, Canzanella S, Palomba G, Colombino M, Muggiano A. Correlation of polymorphic variants into the susceptibility of CDKN2 locus with melanoma outcome. J Clin Oncol 2010. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2010.28.15_suppl.8543] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
|
39
|
Vozza A, Di Girolamo F, Montesarchio G, Capuano A, Ascierto PA, Vozza G. Kerion Celsi favored by the use of a tretinoin+minoxidil+betamethasone valerate lotion in a 28-year-old woman. GIORN ITAL DERMAT V 2010; 145:313-315. [PMID: 20467404] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/29/2023]
Abstract
Kerion Celsi is a parasitic fungal skin infection that tends to occur mainly on the back of the neck, scalp or beard. It is caused by animal fungi. Sometimes the condition resolves itself in a matter of weeks but hair loss in the affected area may be permanent. We report a case of a young woman with Kerion Celsi favored by the use of a tretinoin+minoxidil+betametasone valerate lotion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Vozza
- Department of Dermatology, University of Medicine and Surgery, Seconda Università degli Studi di Napoli Naples, Italy.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Casula M, Budroni M, Cossu A, Ascierto PA, Mozzillo N, Canzanella S, Muggiano A, Palmieri G. The susceptibility CDKN2 locus may have a role on prognosis of melanoma patients. Ann Oncol 2010; 21:1379-1380. [PMID: 20231302 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdq056] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- M Casula
- Institute of Biomolecular Chemistry, National Research Council, Sassari
| | - M Budroni
- Department of Epidemiology, Local Health Unit 1, Sassari
| | - A Cossu
- Department of Pathology, Hospital-University Health Unit, Sassari
| | - P A Ascierto
- Melanoma Unit, National Cancer Institute-Fondazione Pascale, Naples
| | - N Mozzillo
- Melanoma Unit, National Cancer Institute-Fondazione Pascale, Naples
| | - S Canzanella
- House Hospital Onlus Nonprofit Organization, Naples
| | - A Muggiano
- Medical Oncology, Regional Cancer Hospital-Businco, Cagliari, Italy
| | - G Palmieri
- Institute of Biomolecular Chemistry, National Research Council, Sassari.
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Simeone E, Daponte A, De Feo G, Montesarchio V, Chiarion-Sileni V, De Michele I, Caracò C, Palmieri G, Mozzillo N, Ascierto PA. Metronomic schedule of temozolomide with conventional dose of cisplatin in metastatic melanoma. J Clin Oncol 2009. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2009.27.15_suppl.e20009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
e20009 Background: Dacarbazine (DTIC) is the standard treatment for metastatic melanoma. Temozolomide (TMZ) is a potentially attractive chemotherapeutic agent for this disease because of the oral route of administration and efficacy similar to that of dacarbazine. Cisplatin is active against melanoma and might counteract mechanisms of resistance to TMZ. Metronomic administration of TMZ might be another way to overcome resistance. Patients and Methods: We reviewed data of metastatic melanoma patients treated at our Institutions with cisplatin (75 mg/m2 every 28 days) plus TMZ (75 mg/m2/die from day 2 for 21 days). Our practice included such scheme for patients younger than 75 years, with a performance status not worse than 2, and adequate bone marrow, liver and renal function. Assessment of response was done every 3 cycles. Toxicity was graded according to NCI-CTC. Results: From August 2007 to September 2008, 33 patients were treated with a median age of 44 years (18–74); primary melanoma was ulcerated in 19 cases (58%); most frequent sites of metastases were lung (18 cases), brain and lymph nodes (11 cases each); 29 patients were treated as first-line and 4 as second-line. The median number of delivered cycles was 4 (range 2- 8). Toxicity was mild, with no grade 4 event reported. Nausea and vomiting were the most frequent and severe toxic effects: grade 3 in 2 cases each and grade 2 in 16 and 9 cases, respectively. Other toxicities included thrombocytopenia (2 case grade 3 and 3 cases grade 2), anemia (1 grade 3 and 4 grade 2), neutropenia, and fatigue (1 grade 3 each). Overall, 6 patients had a partial response (18.2%; 95% exact CI: 7.0–35.5) and 8 (24%) had a disease stabilization. With a median follow-up of 20 weeks (95% CI: 19–57), there were 19 progressions and a median progression-free survival of 24 weeks (95% CI:16-nr); 9 patients died with a median survival of 50 weeks (95% CI 43-nr). Conclusions: Results obtained in clinical practice with metronomic temozolomide plus cisplatin in the treatment of patients with metastatic melanoma are encouraging, in light of the negative prognostic features of treated patients. We are now planning a formal phase II study. [Table: see text]
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E. Simeone
- Istituto Nazionale Tumori Pascale, Naples, Italy; Azienda Ospedaliera Cotugno, Napoli, Italy; Istituto Oncologico Veneto, Padova, Italy; Institute of Biomolecular Chemistry-CNR, Sassari, Italy
| | - A. Daponte
- Istituto Nazionale Tumori Pascale, Naples, Italy; Azienda Ospedaliera Cotugno, Napoli, Italy; Istituto Oncologico Veneto, Padova, Italy; Institute of Biomolecular Chemistry-CNR, Sassari, Italy
| | - G. De Feo
- Istituto Nazionale Tumori Pascale, Naples, Italy; Azienda Ospedaliera Cotugno, Napoli, Italy; Istituto Oncologico Veneto, Padova, Italy; Institute of Biomolecular Chemistry-CNR, Sassari, Italy
| | - V. Montesarchio
- Istituto Nazionale Tumori Pascale, Naples, Italy; Azienda Ospedaliera Cotugno, Napoli, Italy; Istituto Oncologico Veneto, Padova, Italy; Institute of Biomolecular Chemistry-CNR, Sassari, Italy
| | - V. Chiarion-Sileni
- Istituto Nazionale Tumori Pascale, Naples, Italy; Azienda Ospedaliera Cotugno, Napoli, Italy; Istituto Oncologico Veneto, Padova, Italy; Institute of Biomolecular Chemistry-CNR, Sassari, Italy
| | - I. De Michele
- Istituto Nazionale Tumori Pascale, Naples, Italy; Azienda Ospedaliera Cotugno, Napoli, Italy; Istituto Oncologico Veneto, Padova, Italy; Institute of Biomolecular Chemistry-CNR, Sassari, Italy
| | - C. Caracò
- Istituto Nazionale Tumori Pascale, Naples, Italy; Azienda Ospedaliera Cotugno, Napoli, Italy; Istituto Oncologico Veneto, Padova, Italy; Institute of Biomolecular Chemistry-CNR, Sassari, Italy
| | - G. Palmieri
- Istituto Nazionale Tumori Pascale, Naples, Italy; Azienda Ospedaliera Cotugno, Napoli, Italy; Istituto Oncologico Veneto, Padova, Italy; Institute of Biomolecular Chemistry-CNR, Sassari, Italy
| | - N. Mozzillo
- Istituto Nazionale Tumori Pascale, Naples, Italy; Azienda Ospedaliera Cotugno, Napoli, Italy; Istituto Oncologico Veneto, Padova, Italy; Institute of Biomolecular Chemistry-CNR, Sassari, Italy
| | - P. A. Ascierto
- Istituto Nazionale Tumori Pascale, Naples, Italy; Azienda Ospedaliera Cotugno, Napoli, Italy; Istituto Oncologico Veneto, Padova, Italy; Institute of Biomolecular Chemistry-CNR, Sassari, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Ascierto PA, Napolitano M, Celentano E, Simeone E, Gentilcore G, Capone M, Ciccarelli L, Palmieri G, Castello G, Mozzillo N. Reduction of circulating regulatory T cell (Treg) by intravenous high-dose interferon (HDI) treatment in melanoma patients. J Clin Oncol 2009. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2009.27.15_suppl.9040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
9040 Background: T regulatory (Treg) cells are an immunoregulatory cell type which express high levels of surface CD25, CTLA-4, and GITR. Tregs have been shown to be present in tumor and tumor-draining lymph nodes, acting as an inhibitory population blocking effector cell function. Depletion or blockade of Tregs might be able to enhance antitumor immunity. Recent evidence has been reported about the possibility of High Dose Interferon (HDI) to act through an indirect immunomodulatory mechanism (Gogas, NEJM 2006; Moschos JCO 2006). We started a study to verify if iv HDI treatment in melanoma patients could be able to reduce the number of Treg cells in peripheral blood. Methods: Analysis was performed on melanoma pts referring to the National Cancer Institute of Naples since July 2006 and who addressed to Neoadjuvant or Adjuvant treatment with iv HDI (20 MUI/m2, 5 days per week) for 4 wks. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) were obtained from 22 consecutive melanoma pts. Blood draw was performed at days 0, 8, 15, 22 and 29. PBMC were thawed and labeled with anti-CD4 and anti-CD25hi (BD, San Diego, CA) and anti-FoxP3 (eBioscience, San Diego, CA). Labeled cells were analyzed using a FACScalibur (Becton Dickinson). Results: Fifteen (68.2%) out of 22 pts showed a decrease of Treg cells in peripheral blood. The average value at day 0 for circulating Treg (cTreg) was 2.7%. The average percentage at day 29 was 1.4%. The average reduction was 1,4 (50% reduction in the average value of cTreg). Statistical analysis showed an average decrease of 0.29% per week of treatment. Despite of this clear trend in reducing cTreg by HDI, statistical significance was not reached (probably due to the power of the study). Moreover, it has been observed great differences between the disease status, the prognosis (recurred/not recurred pts, alive/deceased) and an increased basal percentage of cTreg. Our preliminary data are consistent for an effect of HDI on reducing cTreg, although no conclusion about the role of such reduction in terms of response to treatment or as prognostic markers of better/worse disease can be inferred. Further data are awaited in order to verify if the Treg reduction after a HDI treatment may indeed contribute to the antitumor response. [Table: see text]
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P. A. Ascierto
- National Tumor Institute, Napoli, Italy; Institute of Biomolecular Chemistry, CNR, Sassari, Italy
| | - M. Napolitano
- National Tumor Institute, Napoli, Italy; Institute of Biomolecular Chemistry, CNR, Sassari, Italy
| | - E. Celentano
- National Tumor Institute, Napoli, Italy; Institute of Biomolecular Chemistry, CNR, Sassari, Italy
| | - E. Simeone
- National Tumor Institute, Napoli, Italy; Institute of Biomolecular Chemistry, CNR, Sassari, Italy
| | - G. Gentilcore
- National Tumor Institute, Napoli, Italy; Institute of Biomolecular Chemistry, CNR, Sassari, Italy
| | - M. Capone
- National Tumor Institute, Napoli, Italy; Institute of Biomolecular Chemistry, CNR, Sassari, Italy
| | - L. Ciccarelli
- National Tumor Institute, Napoli, Italy; Institute of Biomolecular Chemistry, CNR, Sassari, Italy
| | - G. Palmieri
- National Tumor Institute, Napoli, Italy; Institute of Biomolecular Chemistry, CNR, Sassari, Italy
| | - G. Castello
- National Tumor Institute, Napoli, Italy; Institute of Biomolecular Chemistry, CNR, Sassari, Italy
| | - N. Mozzillo
- National Tumor Institute, Napoli, Italy; Institute of Biomolecular Chemistry, CNR, Sassari, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Pisano M, Baldinu P, Sini MC, Ascierto PA, Tanda F, Palmieri G. Targeting Bcl-2 protein in treatment of melanoma still requires further clarifications. Ann Oncol 2008; 19:2092-3. [PMID: 18977852 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdn672] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|
44
|
Eggermont AM, Suciu S, Ruka W, Marsden J, Testori A, Corrie P, Aamdal S, Ascierto PA, Patel P, Spatz A. EORTC 18961: Post-operative adjuvant ganglioside GM2-KLH21 vaccination treatment vs observation in stage II (T3-T4N0M0) melanoma: 2nd interim analysis led to an early disclosure of the results. J Clin Oncol 2008. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2008.26.15_suppl.9004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
|
45
|
Palmieri G, Sini MC, Casula M, Baldinu P, Palomba G, Colombino M, Ascierto PA, Botti G, Caracò C, Cossu A, Tanda F. Molecular classification for the management of melanoma patients. J Clin Oncol 2008. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2008.26.15_suppl.20028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
|
46
|
Abstract
Prediction of metastatic potential remains one of the main goals to be pursued in order to better assess the risk subgroups of patients with melanoma. Detection of occult melanoma cells in peripheral blood (circulating metastatic cells [CMC]) or in sentinel lymph nodes (sentinel node metastatic cells [SNMC]), could significantly contribute to better predict survival in melanoma patients. An overview of the numerous published studies indicate the existence of several drawbacks about either the reliability of the approaches for identification of occult melanoma cells or the clinical value of CMC and SNMC as prognostic factors among melanoma patients. In this sense, characterization of the molecular mechanisms involved in development and progression of melanoma (referred to as melanomagenesis) could contribute to better classify the different subsets of melanoma patients. Increasing evidence suggest that melanoma develops as a result of accumulated abnormalities in genetic pathways within the melanocytic lineage. The different molecular mechanisms may have separate roles or cooperate during all evolutionary phases of melanocytic tumourigenesis, generating different subsets of melanoma patients with distinct aggressiveness, clinical behaviour, and response to therapy. All these features associated with either the dissemination of occult metastatic cells or the melanomagenesis might be useful to adequately manage the melanoma patients with different prognosis as well as to better address the different melanoma subsets toward more appropriate therapeutic approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Palmieri
- Istituto di Chimica Biomolecolare, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Li Punti-Sassari, Italy.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Sini MC, Manca A, Cossu A, Budroni M, Botti G, Ascierto PA, Cremona F, Muggiano A, D'Atri S, Casula M, Baldinu P, Palomba G, Lissia A, Tanda F, Palmieri G. Molecular alterations at chromosome 9p21 in melanocytic naevi and melanoma. Br J Dermatol 2007; 158:243-50. [PMID: 18028495 DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2007.08310.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The chromosome 9p21 and its CDKN locus, with the p16 tumour suppressor gene (CDKN2A), are recognized as the genomic regions involved in the pathogenesis of melanoma. OBJECTIVES To elucidate further the role of such regions during the different phases of melanocytic tumorigenesis. METHODS Tissue sections from naevi, primary and metastatic melanomas were investigated by fluorescence in situ hybridization for allelic loss at the 9p21 chromosome and by immunochemistry for p16CDKN2A expression. RESULTS Dysplastic naevi and primary or secondary melanomas were found to carry hemizygous deletions within the entire 9p21 region at similar frequencies (varying from 55% to 62%). Allelic deletion spanning the CDKN locus was observed at significantly increased rates moving from early (7%) to advanced (28%) primary melanomas and to secondary melanoma lesions (37%) (P=0.018). Also, inactivation of the p16 gene (CDKN2A) was absent in naevi and present at steadily increasing rates moving from primary melanomas (7% early lesions to 17% advanced lesions) to melanoma metastases (62%) (P=0.004). CONCLUSIONS Our findings indicate that, in a model of sequential accumulation of genetic alterations, 9p21 deletions may play a role in melanocytic transformation and tumour initiation whereas rearrangements at the CDKN locus, and p16 gene (CDKN2A) inactivation may contribute to tumour progression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M C Sini
- Istituto di Chimica Biomolecolare, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Traversa La Crucca 3-Regione Baldinca, 07040 Li Punti-Sassari, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Ascierto PA, Budroni M, Cossu A, Scala S, Simeone E, Giuliano P, Satriano SM, Caracò C, Casula M, Palmieri G. Serial RT-PCR detection of circulating tumour cells as a marker of disease progression in patients with malignant melanoma. J Clin Oncol 2006. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2006.24.18_suppl.18009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
18009 Background: Detection of circulating malignant cells (CMCs) through a reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assay seems to be a demonstration of systemic disease. We here evaluated the prognostic role of RT-PCR assays in serially-taken peripheral blood samples from patients with malignant melanoma (MM). Methods: One hundred forty-nine melanoma patients with disease stage ranging from I to III were consecutively collected in 1997. A multi-marker RT-PCR assay was used on peripheral blood samples obtained at time of diagnosis and every 6 months during the first two years of follow-up (total: 5 samples). Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed after 83 months of median follow-up. Results: Detection of at least one circulating mRNA marker was considered a signal of the presence of CMC (referred to as PCR-positive assay). A significant correlation was found between the rate of recurrences and the increasing number of PCR-positive assays (P = 0.007). Presence of CMC in a high number (≥2) of analysed blood samples was significantly correlated with a poor clinical outcome (disease-free survival: P = 0.019; overall survival: P = 0.034). Multivariate analysis revealed that presence of a PCR-positive status does play a role as independent prognostic factors for overall survival in melanoma patients, adding precision to the predictive power of the disease stage. Conclusions: Our findings indicated that serial RT-PCR assay may identify a high risk subset of melanoma patients with occult cancer cells constantly detected in blood circulation. Prolonged presence of CMCs seems to act as a surrogate marker of disease progression or a sign of more aggressive disease. No significant financial relationships to disclose.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P. A. Ascierto
- National Tumor Institute, Napoli, Italy; Centro Multizonale di Osservazione Azienda, Sassari, Italy; Servizio Anatomia Patologica, Azienda U.S.L.1, Sassari, Italy; Istituto di Chimica Biomolecolare-CNR, Sassari, Italy
| | - M. Budroni
- National Tumor Institute, Napoli, Italy; Centro Multizonale di Osservazione Azienda, Sassari, Italy; Servizio Anatomia Patologica, Azienda U.S.L.1, Sassari, Italy; Istituto di Chimica Biomolecolare-CNR, Sassari, Italy
| | - A. Cossu
- National Tumor Institute, Napoli, Italy; Centro Multizonale di Osservazione Azienda, Sassari, Italy; Servizio Anatomia Patologica, Azienda U.S.L.1, Sassari, Italy; Istituto di Chimica Biomolecolare-CNR, Sassari, Italy
| | - S. Scala
- National Tumor Institute, Napoli, Italy; Centro Multizonale di Osservazione Azienda, Sassari, Italy; Servizio Anatomia Patologica, Azienda U.S.L.1, Sassari, Italy; Istituto di Chimica Biomolecolare-CNR, Sassari, Italy
| | - E. Simeone
- National Tumor Institute, Napoli, Italy; Centro Multizonale di Osservazione Azienda, Sassari, Italy; Servizio Anatomia Patologica, Azienda U.S.L.1, Sassari, Italy; Istituto di Chimica Biomolecolare-CNR, Sassari, Italy
| | - P. Giuliano
- National Tumor Institute, Napoli, Italy; Centro Multizonale di Osservazione Azienda, Sassari, Italy; Servizio Anatomia Patologica, Azienda U.S.L.1, Sassari, Italy; Istituto di Chimica Biomolecolare-CNR, Sassari, Italy
| | - S. M. Satriano
- National Tumor Institute, Napoli, Italy; Centro Multizonale di Osservazione Azienda, Sassari, Italy; Servizio Anatomia Patologica, Azienda U.S.L.1, Sassari, Italy; Istituto di Chimica Biomolecolare-CNR, Sassari, Italy
| | - C. Caracò
- National Tumor Institute, Napoli, Italy; Centro Multizonale di Osservazione Azienda, Sassari, Italy; Servizio Anatomia Patologica, Azienda U.S.L.1, Sassari, Italy; Istituto di Chimica Biomolecolare-CNR, Sassari, Italy
| | - M. Casula
- National Tumor Institute, Napoli, Italy; Centro Multizonale di Osservazione Azienda, Sassari, Italy; Servizio Anatomia Patologica, Azienda U.S.L.1, Sassari, Italy; Istituto di Chimica Biomolecolare-CNR, Sassari, Italy
| | - G. Palmieri
- National Tumor Institute, Napoli, Italy; Centro Multizonale di Osservazione Azienda, Sassari, Italy; Servizio Anatomia Patologica, Azienda U.S.L.1, Sassari, Italy; Istituto di Chimica Biomolecolare-CNR, Sassari, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Palmieri G, Casula M, Colombino M, Satta MP, Rozzo C, Ascierto PA, Castello G, Bianchi-Scarrà G, Cossu A, Tanda F. BRAF gene contributes to melanoma pathogenesis but not to melanoma susceptibility. J Clin Oncol 2004. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2004.22.90140.9584] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- G. Palmieri
- Consiglio Nazionale Ricerche, Santa Maria La Palma, Italy; Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Napoli, Italy; Università degli Studi, Genova, Italy; Università degli Studi, Sassari, Italy
| | - M. Casula
- Consiglio Nazionale Ricerche, Santa Maria La Palma, Italy; Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Napoli, Italy; Università degli Studi, Genova, Italy; Università degli Studi, Sassari, Italy
| | - M. Colombino
- Consiglio Nazionale Ricerche, Santa Maria La Palma, Italy; Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Napoli, Italy; Università degli Studi, Genova, Italy; Università degli Studi, Sassari, Italy
| | - M. P. Satta
- Consiglio Nazionale Ricerche, Santa Maria La Palma, Italy; Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Napoli, Italy; Università degli Studi, Genova, Italy; Università degli Studi, Sassari, Italy
| | - C. Rozzo
- Consiglio Nazionale Ricerche, Santa Maria La Palma, Italy; Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Napoli, Italy; Università degli Studi, Genova, Italy; Università degli Studi, Sassari, Italy
| | - P. A. Ascierto
- Consiglio Nazionale Ricerche, Santa Maria La Palma, Italy; Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Napoli, Italy; Università degli Studi, Genova, Italy; Università degli Studi, Sassari, Italy
| | - G. Castello
- Consiglio Nazionale Ricerche, Santa Maria La Palma, Italy; Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Napoli, Italy; Università degli Studi, Genova, Italy; Università degli Studi, Sassari, Italy
| | - G. Bianchi-Scarrà
- Consiglio Nazionale Ricerche, Santa Maria La Palma, Italy; Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Napoli, Italy; Università degli Studi, Genova, Italy; Università degli Studi, Sassari, Italy
| | - A. Cossu
- Consiglio Nazionale Ricerche, Santa Maria La Palma, Italy; Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Napoli, Italy; Università degli Studi, Genova, Italy; Università degli Studi, Sassari, Italy
| | - F. Tanda
- Consiglio Nazionale Ricerche, Santa Maria La Palma, Italy; Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Napoli, Italy; Università degli Studi, Genova, Italy; Università degli Studi, Sassari, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Mozzillo N, Caracò C, Chiofalo MG, Celentano E, Lastoria S, Botti G, Ascierto PA. Sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with cutaneous melanoma: outcome after 3-year follow-up. Eur J Surg Oncol 2004; 30:440-3. [PMID: 15063899 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2004.01.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/29/2004] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
AIMS The management of patients with cutaneous melanoma in the absence of lymph-node metastases is still controversial. The experience of the National Cancer Institute in Naples was analysed to evaluate the 3-year disease free survival and overall survival for all patients submitted to sentinel node biopsy (SNB). METHODS Data from 265 sentinel biopsies performed in the last five years were reviewed to determine the effect of the treatment on disease free survival and overall survival stratified the patients for node status and tumour ulceration. RESULTS Statistical analysis showed a 3-year survival advantage for sentinel node negative patients compared to sentinel node positive cases with a 88.4 and 72.9%, respectively (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS SNB provides an accurate staging of nodal status in patients with melanoma in the absence of clinical evidence of metastases. Longer follow-up and final results from multicenter selective lymphadenectomy (MSLT) are needed to clarify the role of this procedure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N Mozzillo
- National Cancer Institute, Via M Semmola, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|