1
|
Gutzmer R, Rivoltini L, Levchenko E, Testori A, Utikal J, Ascierto PA, Demidov L, Grob JJ, Ridolfi R, Schadendorf D, Queirolo P, Santoro A, Loquai C, Dreno B, Hauschild A, Schultz E, Lesimple TP, Vanhoutte N, Salaun B, Gillet M, Jarnjak S, De Sousa Alves PM, Louahed J, Brichard VG, Lehmann FF. Safety and immunogenicity of the PRAME cancer immunotherapeutic in metastatic melanoma: results of a phase I dose escalation study. ESMO Open 2016; 1:e000068. [PMID: 27843625 PMCID: PMC5070281 DOI: 10.1136/esmoopen-2016-000068] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2016] [Accepted: 04/22/2016] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose The PRAME tumour antigen is expressed in several tumour types but in few normal adult tissues. A dose-escalation phase I/II study (NCT01149343) assessed the safety, immunogenicity and clinical activity of the PRAME immunotherapeutic (recombinant PRAME protein (recPRAME) with the AS15 immunostimulant) in patients with advanced melanoma. Here, we report the phase I dose-escalation study segment. Patients and methods Patients with stage IV PRAME-positive melanoma were enrolled to 3 consecutive cohorts to receive up to 24 intramuscular injections of the PRAME immunotherapeutic. The RecPRAME dose was 20, 100 or 500 µg in cohorts 1, 2 and 3, respectively, with a fixed dose of AS15. Adverse events (AEs), including predefined dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) and the anti-PRAME humoral response (ELISA), were coprimary end points. Cellular immune responses were evaluated using in vitro assays. Results 66 patients were treated (20, 24 and 22 in the respective cohorts). AEs considered by the investigator to be causally related were mostly grade 1 or 2 injection site symptoms, fatigue, chills, fever and headache. Two DLTs (grade 3 brain oedema and proteinuria) were recorded in two patients in two cohorts (cohorts 2 and 3). All patients had detectable anti-PRAME antibodies after four immunisations. Percentages of patients with predefined PRAME-specific-CD4+T-cell responses after four immunisations were similar in each cohort. No CD8+ T-cell responses were detected. Conclusions The PRAME immunotherapeutic had an acceptable safety profile and induced similar anti-PRAME-specific humoral and cellular immune responses in all cohorts. As per protocol, the phase II study segment was initiated to further evaluate the 500 µg PRAME immunotherapeutic dose. Trial registration number NCT01149343, Results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Gutzmer
- Skin Cancer Center Hannover , Hannover Medical School , Hannover , Germany
| | - L Rivoltini
- Unit of Immunotherapy of Human Tumors , Fondazione RCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori , Milan , Italy
| | - E Levchenko
- Petrov Research Institute of Oncology , St. Petersburg , Russia
| | - A Testori
- Istituto Europeo Di Oncologia , Milano , Italy
| | - J Utikal
- Skin Cancer Unit, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Medical Center Mannheim, Ruprecht-Karl University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
| | - P A Ascierto
- Melanoma, Cancer Immunotherapy and Innovative Therapies Unit , Istituto Nazionale Tumori Fondazione Pascale , Naples , Italy
| | - L Demidov
- Cancer Research Center , Moscow , Russia
| | - J J Grob
- Aix Marseille University Hôpital de la Timone, Service de Dermatologie , Marseille , France
| | - R Ridolfi
- Immunotherapy Unit , Romagna Cancer Institute IRST- IRCCS , Meldola , Italy
| | - D Schadendorf
- Department of Dermatology , University Hospital Essen , Essen , Germany
| | - P Queirolo
- Istituto Nazionale per la Ricerca sul Cancro Oncologia Medica , Genova , Italy
| | - A Santoro
- Humanitas Cancer Center, Istituto Clinico Humanitas IRCCS , Rozzano , Italy
| | - C Loquai
- Department of Dermatology , University of Mainz , Mainz , Germany
| | - B Dreno
- Dermatology Clinic , Hôpital Hôtel-Dieu, CHU Nantes , Nantes , France
| | - A Hauschild
- Department of Dermatology , Skin Cancer Center, Schleswig-Holstein University Hospital , Kiel , Germany
| | - E Schultz
- Department of Dermatology , Paracelsus Medical University, Klinikum Nuremberg , Nuremberg , Germany
| | - T P Lesimple
- Département d'Oncologie Médicale , Centre Eugène Marquis , Rennes , France
| | | | - B Salaun
- GSK Vaccines , Rixensart , Belgium
| | - M Gillet
- GSK Vaccines , Rixensart , Belgium
| | | | - P M De Sousa Alves
- GSK Vaccines, Rixensart, Belgium; Celyad, Mont-Saint-Guibert, Rixensart, Belgium
| | | | - V G Brichard
- GSK Vaccines, Rixensart, Belgium; Vianova-Biosciences, Lasne, Belgium
| | - F F Lehmann
- GSK Vaccines, Rixensart, Belgium; Celyad, Mont-Saint-Guibert, Rixensart, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|