Comparison of methods for the estimation of carboplatin pharmacokinetics in paediatric cancer patients

Utility of carboplatin therapeutic drug monitoring for the treatment of neonate and infant retinoblastoma patients in the United Kingdom

BACKGROUND

Retinoblastoma is the most common intra-ocular malignancy in children and frequently presents in very young patients who commonly require intravenous carboplatin. Delivering this is challenging due to a lack of uniform dosing recommendations, rapid changes in physiological function and the risk of side-effects.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of neonates and infants in the UK with retinoblastoma, who have undergone carboplatin therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). We report on the pharmacokinetic, treatment efficacy and toxicity data.

RESULTS

In total, 29 patients (median age 5 weeks at treatment onset) underwent a total of 74 TDM guided cycles of chemotherapy, involving real time sampling and dose adjustment. An additional 13 patients underwent TDM sampling to modify doses between cycles. Without the adoption of TDM guided dosing, carboplatin exposures would have been ≥20% outside the target AUC in 38/78 (49%) of treatment cycles. Excellent responses and a reassuringly low incidence of toxicities were observed following dose adjustment, despite the young patient age and the implementation of dose increases in the majority of cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Real time TDM is safe, effective and deliverable for neonates and infants receiving carboplatin for retinoblastoma and should be considered standard of care up to the age of 6 months.

Generation of evidence-based carboplatin dosing guidelines for neonates and infants

BACKGROUND

To optimally dose childhood cancer patients it is essential that we apply evidence-based dosing approaches. Carboplatin is commonly dosed to achieve a cumulative target exposure (AUC) in children, with target AUC values of 5.2-7.8 mg/ml.min defined. To achieve these exposures patients are dosed at 6.6 mg/kg/day or 4.4 mg/kg for patients <5 kg. The current study uses real world clinical pharmacology data to optimise body weight-based doses to effectively target AUCs of 5.2-7.8 mg/ml.min in infants.

METHODS

Carboplatin exposures were determined across 165 treatment cycles in 82 patients ≤10 kg. AUC and clearance values were determined by Bayesian modelling from samples collected on day 1. These parameters were utilised to assess current dosing variability, determine doses required to achieve target AUC values and predict change in AUC using the modified dose.

RESULTS

No significant differences in clearance were identified between patients <5 kg and 5-10 kg. Consequently, for patients <5 kg, 4.4 mg/kg dosing was not sufficient to achieve a target AUC of 5.2 mg/ml.min, with <55% of patients within 25% of this target. Optimised daily doses for patients ≤10 kg were 6 mg/kg and 9 mg/kg for cumulative carboplatin target exposures of 5.2 and 7.8 mg/ml.min, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Adoption of these evidence-based carboplatin doses in neonates and infants will reduce drug exposure variability and positively impact treatment.

Over a decade of experience with carboplatin therapeutic drug monitoring in a childhood cancer setting in the United Kingdom

The widely used platinum agent carboplatin represents a good example of an anticancer drug where clear relationships between pharmacological exposure and clinical response and toxicity have previously been shown. Within the setting of childhood cancer, there are defined groups of patients who present a particular challenge when dosing with carboplatin, including neonates and infants, those who are anephric, and poor prognosis patients receiving high-dose chemotherapy. For these groups, nonstandard chemotherapy dosing regimens are currently utilised, often with different approaches between clinical study protocols and between treatment centres. For the treatment of these patient populations in the UK, there is now significant experience in carrying out therapeutic drug monitoring, aiming to consistently achieve target drug exposures, maximise drug efficacy and minimise treatment-related side effects. An ongoing clinical trial is currently providing information on drug exposure for a wide range of anticancer agents in these hard to treat patient populations. In addition to supporting dosing decisions for individual patients, the collection and analysis of these data may allow the development of future dosing regimens. For example, current reduced dosing approaches for neonates and infants based on age or body weight, may well be better replaced by regimens based on a sound pharmacological rationale. The successful use of adaptive carboplatin dosing in childhood cancer should encourage the development of therapeutic drug monitoring approaches more widely in an oncology setting.

Results from the UK Children's Cancer and Leukaemia Group study of extracranial germ cell tumours in children and adolescents (GCIII)

BACKGROUND

For extracranial malignant germ cell tumours (MGCTs) in the UK, the GCII study used carboplatin-based chemotherapy (JEb) and demonstrated equivalent survival to cisplatin-containing protocols. GCIII, a single-arm observational study, used new risk stratification, replaced consolidation chemotherapy with a standard number of cycles and introduced surveillance for all stage I MGCTs. Pure teratomas were registered to understand their natural history.

METHODS

Patients with MGCTs were stratified to three risk groups - low risk (LR), intermediate risk (IR) and high risk (HR), using stage and prognostic factors. Patients with alpha fetoprotein (AFP) >10,000 kU/L, stage IV disease (except testis <5 years and all germinomas) or stage II-IV mediastinal tumour were classified HR. Stage I tumours (LR) received chemotherapy only if disease progressed. IR and HR patients received 4 and 6 JEB cycles, respectively. Carboplatin dose was calculated using glomerular filtration rate to give an area under the curve of 7.9 ml/m².min.

RESULTS

Eighty-six patients with MGCTs were enrolled from 2005 to 2009: 59% female, median age, 5.7 years. Twenty-five patients were LR, 21 IR and 38 HR. Seven LR patients had disease progression; all were successfully treated with chemotherapy. Overall survival (OS) for the whole group was 97%; 5-year event-free survival for JEb-treated patients was 92%, and OS, 95%. JEb was well tolerated with no observed significant hearing or renal side-effects. There was no discernible difference in carboplatin dose whether calculated by body surface area or creatinine clearance. Forty-seven patients with teratoma were managed with surgery and one had malignant transformation.

CONCLUSION

Carboplatin-based chemotherapy as part of a risk-stratified approach leads to excellent survival in paediatric MGCTs, minimising potential burden of long-term effects.

Personalised dosing of medicines for children

Objectives

Doses for most drugs are determined from population-level information, resulting in a standard ?one-size-fits-all’ dose range for all individuals. This review explores how doses can be personalised through the use of the individuals’ pharmacokinetic (PK)-pharmacodynamic (PD) profile, its particular application in children, and therapy areas where such approaches have made inroads.

Key findings

The Bayesian forecasting approach, based on population PK/PD models that account for variability in exposure and response, is a potent method for personalising drug therapy. Its potential utility is even greater in young children where additional sources of variability are observed such as maturation of eliminating enzymes and organs. The benefits of personalised dosing are most easily demonstrated for drugs with narrow therapeutic ranges such as antibiotics and cytotoxics and limited studies have shown improved outcomes. However, for a variety of reasons the approach has struggled to make more widespread impact at the bedside: complex dosing algorithms, high level of technical skills required, lack of randomised controlled clinical trials and the need for regulatory approval.

Summary

Personalised dosing will be a necessary corollary of the new precision medicine initiative. However, it faces a number of challenges that need to be overcome before such an approach to dosing in children becomes the norm.

Chemotherapy completion in elderly women with ovarian, primary peritoneal or fallopian tube cancer - An NRG oncology/Gynecologic Oncology Group study

PURPOSE

A simple measure to predict chemotherapy tolerance in elderly patients would be useful. We prospectively tested the association of baseline Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) score with ability to complete 4 cycles of first line chemotherapy without dose reductions or >7days delay in elderly ovarian cancer patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients' age ≥70 along with their physicians chose between two regimens: CP (Carboplatin AUC 5, Paclitaxel 135mg/m2) or C (Carboplatin AUC 5), both given every 3weeks either after primary surgery or as neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) with IADL and quality of life assessments performed at baseline, pre-cycle 3, and post-cycle 4.

RESULTS

Two-hundred-twelve women were enrolled, 152 selecting CP and 60 selecting C. Those who selected CP had higher baseline IADL scores (p<0.001). After adjusting for age and PS, baseline IADL was independently associated with the choice of regimen (p=0.035). The baseline IADL score was not found to be associated with completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy without dose reduction or delays (p=0.21), but was associated with completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy regardless of dose reduction and delay (p=0.008) and toxicity, with the odds ratio (OR) of grade 3+ toxicity decreasing 17% (OR: 0.83; 95%CI: 0.72-0.96; p=0.013) for each additional activity in which the patient was independent. After adjustment for chemotherapy regimen, IADL was also associated with overall survival (p=0.019) for patients receiving CP.

CONCLUSION

Patients with a higher baseline IADL score (more independent) were more likely to complete 4 cycles of chemotherapy and less likely to experience grade 3 or higher toxicity.

Therapeutic drug monitoring of cancer chemotherapy

Therapeutic drug monitoring is not routinely used for chemotherapy agents. There are Several reasons, but one major drawback is the lack of established therapeutic Concentration ranges. Combination chemotherapy makes the establishment of Therapeutic ranges for individual drugs difficult, the concentration-effect relationship for a single drug may not be the same as when that drug is used in a drug combination. Pharmacokinetic optimization protocols for many classes of cytotoxic compounds exist in specialized centers, and some of these protocols are now part of large multicentre trials. Nonetheless, TDM clearly has the potential to improve the clinical use of chemotherapy gents, most of which have very narrow therapeutic indices and highly variable pharmacokinetics. A substantial body of literature accumulating during the past 15 years demonstrates relationships between systemic exposure to various chemotherapy agents and their toxic or therapeutic effects. This article reviews TDM concepts in addition to tools based on pharmacokinetic modeling of chemotherapy agents. The administered dose of chemotherapy agents is sometimes adjusted individually using either a priori or a posteriori methods. These models can only be applied by using the same dose and schedule as the original study. Bayesian estimation offers more flexibility in blood sampling times and, owing to its precision and to the amount of information provided is the method of choice for ensuring that a given patient benefits from the desired systemic exposure. Moreover, the role and application of Pharmacogenetics as a tool for individualizing chemotherapy is discussed highlighting the agents and mechanisms that have been well studied and defined and their relevance to clinical practice. Finally, this paper address issues critical to the optimal use of TDM in a clinical setting, and the role of clinical pharmacist in this regard. In addition, it discusses future developments in this field that can contribute to improving cancer chemotherapy In terms of patient outcome and survival. J Oncol Pharm Practice (2007) 13: 207—221.

Adaptive dosing of anticancer drugs in neonates: facilitating evidence-based dosing regimens

Purpose

Selection of the most appropriate chemotherapy dosing regimens for neonates treated within the first weeks of life represents a significant clinical dilemma. Due to a lack of information relating to the clinical pharmacology of anticancer drugs in these challenging patients, current dosing guidelines are based on limited scientific rationale. In the current study, we investigate the utilisation of therapeutic drug monitoring approaches in neonates with localised hepatoblastoma, Wilms’ tumour and stage 4S neuroblastoma, being treated with widely used anticancer drugs.

Methods

Plasma concentrations of cisplatin, vincristine, etoposide and carboplatin were quantified in two neonates being treated within the first 3 weeks of life and in a 32-week preterm infant treated at a gestational age of 40 weeks. Therapeutic drug monitoring was carried out where appropriate, based on the pharmacokinetic data obtained in conjunction with clinical response and toxicity.

Results

Treatment of a child aged 2 weeks with a recommended cisplatin dose reduction for weight to 1.8 mg/kg resulted in achievement of unbound cisplatin plasma concentrations of 0.01–0.08 µg/mL, markedly lower than exposures previously reported in infants and older children. A dose increase to 2.7 mg/kg was implemented, leading to the achievement of levels more in-line with those previously reported. This increased dose level was well tolerated over six courses of treatment, resulting in a good response to cisplatin monotherapy and the patient remains in remission at 3.5 years. In contrast, a 50 % vincristine dose reduction for weight in a 3-week-old neonate resulted in plasma concentrations comparable to levels observed in older children, leading to successful treatment and continued remission at 2 years. In a third patient, etoposide and carboplatin clearance values normalised to body weight were comparable to those reported in older children, resulting in comparatively lower exposures following reduced dosing.

Conclusions

The current report provides unique data on the pharmacokinetics of several widely used anticancer drugs in neonates treated within the first few weeks of life. The provision of these data acts as a useful reference point to support future dosing decisions to be made by clinicians in the treatment of these challenging patients.

Carboplatin therapeutic monitoring in preterm and full-term neonates

Introduction

Administration of the most appropriate dose of chemotherapy to neonates is particularly challenging and frequently not standardised based on any scientific rationale. We report the clinical utility of carboplatin therapeutic drug monitoring in preterm and full-term neonates within the first month of life.

Methods

Carboplatin therapeutic monitoring was performed to achieve target drug exposures area under the plasma concentration–time curve (AUC values) in nine preterm and full-term neonates diagnosed with retinoblastoma or neuroblastoma treated over an 8 year period. Carboplatin was administered over 3 days with therapeutic drug monitoring utilised to target cumulative AUC values of 5.2–7.8 mg/ml min.

Results

AUC values achieved were within 15% of target values for the individual courses of treatment in all but one patient (12/13 courses of treatment), with dose modifications of up to 215% required to achieve target AUC values, based on initial mg/kg dosing schedules. Carboplatin clearance determined across three consecutive chemotherapy courses in two patients increased from 3.4 to 7.1 ml/min and from 7.2 to 16.5 ml/min, representing increases of 210–230% over several weeks of treatment. Complete remission was observed in 8/9 patients, with no renal toxicity reported and only one patient experiencing ototoxicity.

Conclusion

The study highlights the benefits of utilising therapeutic drug monitoring to achieve target carboplatin AUC values in preterm and full-term neonates treated within the first few weeks of life, particularly in view of marked increases in drug clearance observed over consecutive chemotherapy courses. In the absence of therapeutic drug monitoring, body-weight based dosing is recommended, with dosing guidance provided for both approaches to inform future treatment.

Pharmacokinetics of Carboplatin in a One-Year-Old Anuric Boy Undergoing Hemodialysis and a Review of the Literature

There have been few reports of carboplatin-based chemotherapy for anuric infants. As we had a chance to treat a one-year-old anuric hepatoblastoma patient with carboplatin, we performed a pharmacokinetic analysis and examined the optimal treatment strategy. A one-year-old anuric boy under peritoneal dialysis was diagnosed with hepatoblastoma. Surgical resection was performed, and administration of carboplatin was scheduled postoperatively aiming at 5 mg·min/mL of the area under the curve from the time of dosing to the time of the last observation (AUC(0-t)). We set the initial dose at 50 mg, higher than that calculated by the Calvert formula (34 mg); the time from the end of carboplatin infusion to the initiation of hemodialysis at 2 h; and the hemodialysis duration at 24 h. The actual AUC0-t was 3.05 mg·min/mL because the elimination half-lives before and during hemodialysis were shorter than expected. The AUC(0-t) after the second dose (100 mg) and the third dose (80 mg) were 7.00 and 4.68 mg·min/mL, respectively. The Calvert formula is not suitable for hemodialysis patients because removal of platinum by hemodialysis is not taken into account. It appears that extrarenal clearance in anuric infants is different from that in adults. We obtained an optimal AUC(0-t) using a dose of 80 mg (200 mg/m(2)), setting the time from the end of carboplatin infusion to the initiation of hemodialysis at 2 h, and performing 8-h hemodialysis. Further accumulation of the pharmacokinetic data of carboplatin is necessary for anuric children.

Constancy in Integrated Cisplatin Plasma Concentrations Among Pediatric Patients

The authors report on the variability in the integrated quantity of free (unbound) plasma cisplatin (area under curve of plasma concentration versus time, AUC). The AUC was measured in 19 patients receiving cisplatin doses proportional to body surface areas (BSA), 30 mg/m2 over 1 hour. The relative standard deviation (RSD, population standard deviation divided by mean value) for the maximum free plasma cisplatin concentration (Cmax, microM) was 0.338; for the half-life (t1/2, minute), 0.210; and for the AUC (microM minute), 0.320. Thus, BSA-based dosing gave significant variability in the AUC. We attempted to use (weight)a(height)b, seeking values of a and b that gave the smallest RSD in AUC, but only minimal improvement could be obtained by deviating from the BSA formula (a=b=0.5). However, dosing proportional to (weight)d(Cmax)f (with d approximately 3/4 and f approximately -1) reduced the RSD in AUC from approximately 1/3 to approximately 1/10. Dosing proportional to (weight)m (Cmax)n(t1/2)p (with m approximately 0.7, n approximately -1, and p approximately -1/2) reduced it further, to approximately 1/32. In contrast, using (weight)d(Cmax)f(age)g gave no improvement over (weight)d(Cmax)f. The authors conclude that the inconsistency in AUC can be reduced 10-fold with dosing proportional to the weight and the drug pharmacokinetic parameters [(weight0.7)/(Cmaxxt1/2(0.5))].

Therapeutic drug monitoring in cancer chemotherapy

For a select number of drugs, proper management of patients includes monitoring serum or plasma concentrations of the drugs and adjusting the doses accordingly - this practice is referred to as therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). The need for TDM arises when pharmacokinetic variability of drugs is not easily accounted for by common clinical parameters. Many chemotherapeutic drugs have large interindividual variability, yet TDM is not commonplace in chemotherapy management. This review will discuss pharmacokinetics in the context of chemotherapeutic drugs, examine the few instances where TDM is currently used in the field of oncology and propose other drugs where TDM might be useful for dose adjustments in the management of chemotherapy.

Principles of therapeutic drug monitoring

Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is central to optimize drug efficacy in children, because the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of most drugs differ greatly between children and adults. Many factors should be analyzed to implement TDM in the pediatric population, including a validated pharmacological parameter and an analytical method adapted to children as limited sampling volumes and high sensitivity are required. The use of population approaches, new analytical methods such as saliva and dried blood spots, and pharmacodynamic monitoring give attractive options to improve TDM, individualize therapy in order to optimize efficacy and reduce adverse drug reactions.

A systematic review of limited sampling strategies for platinum agents used in cancer chemotherapy

Despite evidence in the literature suggesting that a strong correlation exists between the pharmacokinetic parameters and pharmacodynamic effect of anticancer agents, many of these agents are still dosed by body surface area. Therapeutic drug monitoring with the aim of pharmacokinetic-guided dosing would not only maintain target concentrations associated with efficacy but may potentially minimise the likelihood of dose-related systemic toxicities. The pharmacokinetic parameter that displays the best correlation with the pharmacodynamics of anticancer drugs is the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC). However, accurate determination of the AUC requires numerous blood samples over an extended interval, which is not feasible in clinical practice. Therefore, limited sampling strategies (LSSs) have been proposed as a means to accurately and precisely estimate pharmacokinetic parameters with a minimal number of blood samples. LSSs have been developed for many drugs, particularly ciclosporin and other immunosuppressants, as well as for certain anticancer drugs. This systematic review evaluates LSSs developed for the platinum compounds and categorises 18 pertinent citations according to criteria adapted from the US Preventive Services Task Force. Thirteen citations (four level I, six level II-1, three level II-2) pertained to LSSs for carboplatin, four citations (one level II-1, one level II-2, two level III) to cisplatin LSSs, and one citation (level II-2) to nedaplatin. Based on the current evidence, it appears that LSSs may be useful for pharmacokinetic-guided dosage adjustments of carboplatin in both adults and children with cancer. Although some validation studies suggest that LSSs can be extended to different cancer populations or different chemotherapy regimens, other studies dispute this finding. Although the use of LSSs to predict the pharmacokinetic parameters of cisplatin and nedaplatin appear promising, the quality of evidence from published studies does not support routine implementation at this time.LSSs represent one approach in which clinicians can make specific dosage adjustments for individual patients to optimise outcomes. However, the limitations of these strategies must also be taken into consideration. There is also a need for prospective studies to demonstrate that application of LSSs for platinum agents ultimately improves patient response and decreases systemic toxicities.

Adaptive dosing and platinum-DNA adduct formation in children receiving high-dose carboplatin for the treatment of solid tumours

A pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic study was carried out to investigate the feasibility and potential importance of therapeutic monitoring following high-dose carboplatin treatment in children. High-dose carboplatin was administered over 3 or 5 days, with the initial dose based on renal function, to achieve target area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) values of 21 or 20 mg ml(-1).min, respectively. Dose adjustment was carried out based on observed individual daily AUC values, to obtain the defined target exposures. Platinum-DNA adduct levels were determined in peripheral blood leucocytes and toxicity data were obtained. Twenty-eight children were studied. Based on observed AUC values, carboplatin dose adjustment was performed in 75% (21 out of 28) patients. Therapeutic monitoring resulted in the achievement of carboplatin exposures within 80-126% of target AUC values, as compared to estimated exposures of 65-213% of target values without dose adjustment. The carboplatin AUC predicted with no dose modification was positively correlated with pretreatment glomerular filtration rate (GFR) values. Higher GFR values were observed in those patients who would have experienced AUC values >25% above the target AUC than those patients attaining AUC values >25% below the target AUC, following renal function-based dosing. Platinum-DNA adduct levels correlated with observed AUC values on day 1 of carboplatin and increased over a 5-day course of treatment. Real-time monitoring of carboplatin pharmacokinetics with adaptive dosing is both feasible and necessary for the attainment of consistent AUC values in children receiving high-dose carboplatin treatment. Pharmacodynamic data suggest a strong correlation between carboplatin pharmacokinetics and the drug-target interaction.

A strategy for controlling potential interactions between natural health products and chemotherapy: a review in pediatric oncology

The high prevalence of complementary and alternative medicine use including natural health products (NHPs) in the pediatric oncology population is well established. The potential for concurrent use of NHPs with conventional chemotherapy necessitates physician awareness regarding the potential risks and benefits that might come from this coadministration. Knowledge of interactions between NHPs and chemotherapy is poorly characterized; however, an understanding of potential mechanisms of interaction by researchers and clinicians is important. Concerns regarding the use of antioxidants during chemotherapy are controversial and evidence exists to support both adherents and detractors in this debate. Our review addresses issues regarding potential interactions between NHPs and chemotherapies used in pediatric oncology from a pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic perspective. Examples of combinations of NHP and chemotherapies are briefly presented in addition to a strategy to avoid (or induce) a possible interaction between a NHP and chemotherapy. In conclusion, more clinical research is needed to substantiate or preclude the use of NHPs in the treatment of cancer and especially in combination with chemotherapy.

Flat Dosing of Carboplatin Is Justified in Adult Patients with Normal Renal Function

PURPOSE

The Calvert formula is a widely applied algorithm for the a priori dosing of carboplatin based on patients glomerular filtration rate (GFR) as accurately measured using the 51Cr-EDTA clearance. Substitution of the GFR in this formula by an estimate of creatinine clearance or GFR as calculated by formulae using serum creatinine (SCR; Cockcroft-Gault, Jelliffe, and Wright) is, however, routine clinical practice in many hospitals. The goal of this study was to validate this practice retrospectively in a large heterogeneous adult patient population.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Concentration-time data of ultrafilterable platinum of 178 patients (280 courses, 3,119 samples) with different types of cancer receiving carboplatin-based chemotherapy in conventional and high doses were available. Data were described with a linear two-compartment population pharmacokinetic model. Relations between SCR-based formulae for estimating renal function and carboplatin clearance were investigated.

RESULTS

None of the tested SCR-based estimates of renal function were relevantly related to the pharmacokinetic variables of carboplatin. Neither SCR (median, 51; range, 18-124 micromol/L) nor the estimated GFR using the three different formulae was related to carboplatin clearance.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data do not support the application of modifications of the Calvert formula by estimating GFR from SCR in the a priori dosing of carboplatin in patients with relatively normal renal function (creatinine clearance, >50 mL/min). For targeted carboplatin exposures, the original Calvert formula, measuring GFR using the 51Cr-EDTA clearance, remains the method of choice. Alternatively, in patients with normal renal function, a flat dose based on the mean population carboplatin clearance should be administered.

Potential clinical impact of taking multiple blood samples for research studies in paediatric oncology: how much do we really know?

Pharmacological studies of anti-cancer agents in children are essential to determine their clinical safety and efficacy, both of which can differ considerably from that observed in adults. However, the potential clinical impact of taking blood samples, in addition to those required for standard clinical practice is commonly a concern for both medical and allied staff and parents. Frequently quoted 'safe limits' of 3%-5% of total blood volume taken on any one study day are not based on published data and may not be acceptable for all patients. This article reviews some of the reasons why clinical pharmacology data for anti-cancer drugs is often lacking in a paediatric patient population, summarises data from a retrospective study investigating the potential impact of repeated blood sampling for research purposes and discusses how this issue may be more systematically addressed in future studies. Research involving children with cancer should be limited to those studies addressing key scientific questions and should be designed to limit both the number and volume of blood samples required.

Sparse Sampling Design for Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Sequentially Administered Cyclophosphamide, Thiotepa, and Carboplatin (CTC)

The alkylating agents cyclophosphamide, thiotepa, and carboplatin (CTC) are administered simultaneously in high-dose chemotherapy regimens. This regimen is sometimes complicated by severe organ toxicities, which may be caused by interindividual variability in the pharmacokinetics of the agents. Monitoring plasma levels and adapting doses may reduce variability in exposure to the compounds and their metabolites. The aim of this study was to develop and validate a sparse sampling design for routine dose individualization of cyclophosphamide, thiotepa, and carboplatin both during and between courses in the CTC regimen. Models describing the population pharmacokinetics of the prodrug cyclophosphamide (4000 or 6000 mg/m) and its activated metabolite 4-hydroxycylophosphamide, thiotepa (320 or 480 mg/m), and its equipotent metabolite tepa, and carboplatin (1067 or 1600 mg/m) in the 4-day CTC regimen have been developed previously using the program NONMEM. Based on these models, plasma concentrations were calculated in 20 groups of 50 simulated patients in each group during multiple courses of therapy, and the exposure, expressed as area under the plasma concentration-versus-time curve (AUC), was calculated. Subsequently, individual model-predicted AUCs were calculated for all courses, based on selected simulated plasma concentrations during the first course of therapy. Strategies were compared by assessment of their predictive performance of the AUC and their applicability in clinical practice. Withdrawal of 3 samples on the first day of the course at 190, 290, and 400 minutes after start of cyclophosphamide infusion resulted in unbiased and precise first course AUC predictions of 4-hydroxycylophosphamide, thiotepa and tepa, and carboplatin (precision [root mean squared relative prediction error, %RMSE] 20%, 16%, 8.8%, respectively). Applying this same strategy at day 3 (or 4) of the course, with an additional sample at 600 minutes on both days, resulted in unbiased and precise predictions of the AUC of a following course (%RMSE 21%, 18%, 17%, respectively). Prospective validation of the strategies in 23 additional patients yielded comparable results. It can be concluded that a good and useful sparse sampling design was developed for precise and accurate estimation of the AUCs of 4-hydroxycyclophosphamide, thiotepa and tepa, and carboplatin in the CTC regimen. This method is valuable in pharmacokinetically guided dose adaptation both during and between CTC courses.

Pharmacokinetic studies in children with cancer

We reviewed the current status of our knowledge of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of some anti-neoplastic drugs, used in the treatment of childhood cancer. Extrapolation of data from pharmacokinetic studies in adults to the paediatric population is often not feasible. Specific studies in children are needed. Of all reviewed anti-neoplastic drugs methotrexate appears to be most extensively studied. Methotrexate pharmacokinetics is correlated with toxicity and response to therapy, and it has been shown that individualized adaptive dosing of methotrexate is correlated with a better response to therapy without increasing toxicity in children with ALL and osteosarcoma. Of most of the other reviewed anti-neoplastic drugs it is demonstrated that pharmacokinetics is correlated with toxicity, and of some drugs a relationship of pharmacokinetics with response to therapy is demonstrated as well. In case of cytarabine, etoposide, and teniposide, individualized dosing also appears to be feasible. However, there is no evidence that this strategy improves response to therapy. Specifically data on pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic correlations and effect of pharmacokinetically guided, individualized dosing are important for the design of optimal cancer chemotherapy for individual patients. Unfortunately for a considerable number of anti-neoplastic drugs these specific data are lacking in children and future research is needed.

Accuracy, Feasibility, and Clinical Impact of Prospective Bayesian Pharmacokinetically Guided Dosing of Cyclophosphamide, Thiotepa, and Carboplatin in High-Dose Chemotherapy

Purpose: Relationships between toxicity and pharmacokinetics have been shown for cyclophosphamide, thiotepa, and carboplatin (CTC) in high-dose chemotherapy. We prospectively evaluated whether variability in exposure to CTC and their activated metabolites can be decreased with pharmacokinetically guided dose administration and evaluated its clinical effect.

Experimental Design: Patients received multiple 4-day courses of cyclophosphamide (1,000–1,500 mg/m2/d), thiotepa (80–120 mg/m2/d), and carbop latin (area under the plasma concentration-time curve 3.3–5 mg × min/mL/d). Doses were adapted on day 3 based on pharmacokinetic analyses of cyclophosphamide, 4-hydroxycyclophosphamide, thiotepa, tepa, and carboplatin done on day 1 using a Bayesian algorithm. Doses were also adjusted before and during second and third courses. Observed toxicity was compared with that in patients receiving standard dose CTC (n = 43).

Results: A total of 46 patients (108 courses) were included. For cyclophosphamide, thiotepa, and carboplatin, a total of 39, 58, and 65 dose adaptations were done within courses and 17, 40, and 43 before courses. The precision within which the target exposure was reached improved compared with no adaptation, especially after within-course adaptations (precision for cyclophosphamide, thiotepa, and carboplatin is 19%, 16%, and 13%, respectively); &gt;85% led to an exposure within ±25% of the target compared with 60% without dose adjustments. Toxicity was similar to that in a reference population, although the incidence of veno-occlusive disease was reduced.

Conclusions: Bayesian pharmacokinetically guided dosing for CTC was feasible and led to a marked reduction in variability of exposure.

Pharmacokinetics of low-dose carboplatin and applicability of a method of calculation for estimating individual drug clearance

BACKGROUND

Carboplatin is the only cancer drug for which conventional doses are individually adjusted according to estimated clearance and target area under the curve (AUC). The aim of this prospective study was (i) to evaluate intra- and interpatient variability of ultrafilterable (UF) carboplatin AUC(0-)(infinity) and (ii) to test whether the prediction of carboplatin clearance according to the Chatelut formula established for conventional carboplatin doses was accurate for low carboplatin doses.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty-one head and neck cancer patients (29 men, two women, mean age 55.9 years) received concomitant radiotherapy (Rgamma 2 Gy/day) and chemotherapy (carboplatin 50 mg/m(2)/day i.v.) for 7 weeks: Rgamma was administered 5 days/week (days 1-5) and carboplatin 2 days/week (days 1 and 4). Pharmacokinetics was performed once per week. A limited sample strategy based on Bayesian analysis was first validated and blood was subsequently taken 1 and 4 h after the end of carboplatin administration.

RESULTS

A total of 143 cycles was analyzed. Ultrafilterable carboplatin AUC(0-)(infinity) ranged from 0.360 to 4.200 mg.min/ml (mean 0.830, median 0.670). As a corollary, UF carboplatin clearance ranged from 19.1 to 244.7 ml/min. Ultrafilterable carboplatin concentrations were very stable over time: AUC(0-)(infinity) variability due to treatment duration contributed to <1% of the total variance, while interpatient variability contributed to 68.6%. Accordingly, intrasubject effect was not significant (P = 0.38) whereas intersubject effect was highly significant (P <0.001). These results suggest that optimal dosage for targeting a given AUC may vary within a 13-fold range between patients. The Chatelut formula, based on creatininemia, body weight, age and sex, over estimates carboplatin clearance by 40% on average (bias 95% CI 29.6% to 51.1%). No significant relationship was observed between either bone marrow toxicity or creatinine clearance decrease and carboplatin pharmacokinetics.

CONCLUSIONS

The Chatelut carboplatin clearance model established for conventional carboplatin dosages (>100 mg/m(2)) is not applicable for targeting low AUC (<1 mg x min/ml).

Application of pharmacokinetic modelling to the routine therapeutic drug monitoring of anticancer drugs

Over the last 10 years, proofs of the clinical interest of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of certain anticancer drugs have been established. Numerous studies have shown that TDM is an efficient tool for controlling the toxicity of therapeutic drugs, and a few trials have even demonstrated that it can improve their efficacy. This article critically reviews TDM tools based on pharmacokinetic modelling of anticancer drugs. The administered dose of anticancer drugs is sometimes adjusted individually using either a priori or a posteriori methods. The most frequent clinical application of a priori formulae concerns carboplatin and allows the computation of the first dose based on biometrical and biological data such as weight, age, gender, creatinine clearance and glomerular filtration rate. A posteriori methods use drug plasma concentrations to adjust the subsequent dose(s). Thus, nomograms allowing dose adjustment on the basis of blood concentration are routinely used for 5-fluorouracil given as long continuous infusions. Multilinear regression models have been developed, for example for etoposide, doxorubicin. carboplatin, cyclophosphamide and irinotecan, to predict a single exposure variable [such as area under concentration-time curve (AUC)] from a small number of plasma concentrations obtained at predetermined times after a standard dose. These models can only be applied by using the same dose and schedule as the original study. Bayesian estimation offers more flexibility in blood sampling times and, owing to its precision and to the amount of information provided, is the method of choice for ensuring that a given patient benefits from the desired systemic exposure. Unlike the other a posteriori methods, Bayesian estimation is based on population pharmacokinetic studies and can take into account the effects of different individual factors on the pharmacokinetics of the drug. Bayesian estimators have been used to determine maximum tolerated systemic exposure thresholds (e.g. for topotecan or teniposide) as well as for the routine monitoring of drugs characterized by a very high interindividual pharmacokinetic variability such as methotrexate or carboplatin. The development of these methods has contributed to improving cancer chemotherapy in terms of patient outcome and survival and should be pursued.

Estimation of glomerular filtration rate in cancer patients

The frequent need to obtain an estimate of renal function in cancer patients, not least for targeting carboplatin dose, has led to a number of approaches to estimate glomerular filtration rate (GFR). This study aimed to develop a simple and reliable method to estimate GFR using readily-available patient characteristics. Data from 62 patients with estimates of 51Cr-EDTA clearance were analysed to determine the most appropriate formula relating this method of measuring GFR to patient characteristics. The population pharmacokinetics of 51Cr-EDTA were analysed using NONMEM to evaluate the influence of each covariate. The formulae derived were then validated using a further 38 patients and compared with those obtained using existing formulae. 51Cr-EDTA clearance (GFR) was positively related to Dubois surface area, negatively related to age, and inversely related to serum creatinine (SCr). Females had lower 51Cr-EDTA clearance than males. The enzymatic method of SCr assay gave more reliable results than the Jaffe colorimetric method. A measure of creatine kinase significantly improved the estimation of GFR. The new formula produced estimates of GFR which were less biased (Mean Prediction Error = -3%) and more precise (Mean Absolute Prediction Error = 12%) than Cockcroft and Gault (-8% and 16%) or Jelliffe (-15% and 19%) estimates. The formulae developed here can be used to provide reliable estimates of GFR, particularly in regard to targeted dosing of carboplatin.

Prospective validation of renal function-based carboplatin dosing in children with cancer: A United Kingdom Children's Cancer Study Group Trial

PURPOSE

Carboplatin dosing in adults with cancer is based on renal function. The purpose of the current study was to validate a previously developed pediatric carboplatin-dosing formula.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirty-eight pediatric patients were randomized to receive a carboplatin dose calculated according to surface area or a renal function-based dosing formula. On the next course of therapy, the alternative dosing method was used for each patient. Carboplatin pharmacokinetics (based on free plasma platinum concentrations) were measured after both courses.

RESULTS

The mean observed areas under the carboplatin concentration-versus-time curve (AUCs) after renal function- and surface area-based dosing were 98% and 95% of the target AUCs, respectively. The variation in the observed AUC was significantly less after renal function-based dosing (F test, P =.02), such that 74% of courses had an observed AUC within +/- 20% of the target value, versus 49% for courses after dosing according to surface area. Only one of 22 courses at the center with the most experience with renal function-based dosing was associated with an AUC outside +/- 20% of the target value, versus nine of 22 courses after surface area-based dosing in the same center. There was a relationship (r(2) =.71) between carboplatin AUC and thrombocytopenia in 10 neuroblastoma patients treated with a combination of carboplatin, vincristine, etoposide, and cyclophosphamide.

CONCLUSION

Renal function-based carboplatin dosing in children results in more consistent drug exposure than surface area-based drug administration.

Adaptive control methods for the dose individualisation of anticancer agents

Numerous studies have found a clear relationship between systemic exposure and the toxicity or (more rarely) the efficacy of anticancer agents. Moreover, the clearance of most of these drugs differs widely between patients. These findings, combined with the narrow therapeutic index of anticancer drugs, suggest that patient outcome would be improved if doses were individualised to achieve a target systemic exposure. Bayesian maximum a posteriori probability (MAP) forecasting is an efficient and robust method for the optimisation of drug therapy, but its use for anticancer drugs is not yet extensive. The aim of this paper is to review the application of population pharmacokinetics and MAP to anticancer drugs and to evaluate whether and when MAP Bayesian estimation improves the clinical benefit of anticancer chemotherapy. For each drug, the relationships between pharmacokinetic variables [e.g. plasma concentration or the area under the concentration-time curve] and pharmacodynamic effects are described. Secondly, the methodologies employed are considered and, finally, the results are analysed in terms of predictive performance as well as, where possible, the impact on clinical end-points. Some studies were retrospective and intended only to evaluate individual pharmacokinetic parameter values using very few blood samples. Among the prospective trials, a few studied the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic relationships which provided the basis for routine pharmacokinetic monitoring. Others were performed in clinical context where MAP Bayesian estimation was used to determine maximum tolerated systemic exposure (e.g. for carboplatin, topotecan, teniposide) or for pharmacokinetic monitoring (e.g. for methotrexate or platinum compounds). Indeed, its flexibility in blood sampling times makes this technique much more applicable than other limited sampling strategies. These examples demonstrate that individual dose adjustment helps manage toxicity. The performance of pharmacokinetic monitoring is linked to the methodology used at each step of its design and application. Moreover, a limitation to the use of pharmacokinetic monitoring for certain anticancer drugs has been the difficulty in obtaining pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic data. Recent progress in analytical methods, as well as the development of noninvasive methods (such as positron emission tomography) for evaluating the effects of chemotherapy, will help to define pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationships. Bayesian estimation is the strategy of choice for performing pharmacokinetic studies, as well as ensuring that a given patient benefits from the desired systemic exposure. Together, these methods could contribute to improving cancer chemotherapy in terms of patient outcome and survival.

A limited sampling strategy for determining carboplatin AUC and monitoring drug dosage

There are several convincing reports showing relationships between the area under the curve of ultrafilterable concentration versus time (AUC) and pharmacodynamics of carboplatin. It is advisable, in treated patients, to check the AUC that is effectively delivered as compared with the prescribed AUC. To this end, limited sampling strategy seems to be an adequate approach since it limits the constraints of repeated blood sampling for both patients and nursing staff. A flexible limited sampling method for assessing ultrafilterable carboplatin AUC was developed. This method was based on a Bayesian estimation of carboplatin clearance using the NON linear Mixed Effect Model (NONMEN) program and a large pharmacokinetic and covariates database (103 patients). The optimal sampling design was a two-sample schedule (1 and 4 h after the end of infusion). During a prospective evaluation, it allowed an adequate estimation of carboplatin clearance with a non-significant bias (-4.5%) and a good precision (9%). In a second stage, this method was clinically applied to monitor carboplatin AUC in a group of 5 patients with metastatic germ cell tumours treated with intensified high dose carboplatin-based chemotherapy for 4 days. Dosage adjustments were performed according to daily controls of their AUC in order to obtain a total AUC of 20 mg/ml x min. By using this strategy all patients effectively received a total AUC very close to this targeted AUC, thus proving the clinical usefulness of this limited sampling method.

Population pharmacokinetics of carboplatin in children

OBJECTIVES

In pediatric patients, administration of carboplatin according to body surface area results in a large variation in the area under the plasma ultrafilterable carboplatin concentration versus time curve. A population pharmacokinetic study using the NONMEM program was undertaken to determine the effects of a variety of covariates on the clearance of ultrafilterable carboplatin.

PATIENTS

Plasma carboplatin pharmacokinetics were determined in 57 children (2 months to 18 years old, with serum creatinine levels ranging from 27 to 268 mumol/L) treated for various tumor types.

RESULTS

The best fit corresponded to the formula: clearance (ml/min) = 2.85.weight.(1-0.00357.serum creatinine).(1-0.372.Np) + 8.7 (with serum creatinine in micromoles per liter, weight in kilograms, and Np = 1 or 0 for unilateral nephrectomy or not, respectively). The interindividual variability in clearance, as expressed by the coefficient of variation, decreased from 74% (no covariates) to 49% by taking account of weight, and to 29% under the final regression formula.

CONCLUSION

The ability of this formula to predict carboplatin clearance in children should be evaluated prospectively and compared to a method based on the determination of the glomerular filtration rate.