Common denominators for sex

A history of the genetic and molecular identification of genes and their functions controlling insect sex determination

The genetics of the sex determination regulatory cascade in Drosophila melanogaster has a fascinating history, interlinked with the foundation of the Genetics discipline itself. The discovery that alternative splicing rather than differential transcription is the molecular mechanism underlying the upstream control of sex differences in the Drosophila model system was surprising. This notion is now fully integrated into the scientific canon, appearing in many genetics textbooks and online education resources. In the last three decades, it was a key reference point for starting evolutionary studies in other insect species by using homology-based approaches. This review will introduce a very brief history of Drosophila genetics. It will describe the genetic and molecular approaches applied for the identifying and cloning key genes involved in sex determination in Drosophila and in many other insect species. These comparative analyses led to supporting the idea that sex-determining pathways have evolved mainly by recruiting different upstream signals/genes while maintaining widely conserved intermediate and downstream regulatory genes. The review also provides examples of the link between technological advances and research achievements, to stimulate reflections on how science is produced. It aims to hopefully strengthen the related historical and conceptual knowledge of general readers of other disciplines and of younger geneticists, often focused on the latest technical-molecular approaches.

The Drosophila STUbL protein Degringolade limits HES functions during embryogenesis

Degringolade (Dgrn) encodes a Drosophila SUMO-targeted ubiquitin ligase (STUbL) protein similar to that of mammalian RNF4. Dgrn facilitates the ubiquitylation of the HES protein Hairy, which disrupts the repressive activity of Hairy by inhibiting the recruitment of its cofactor Groucho. We show that Hey and all HES family members, except Her, interact with Dgrn and are substrates for its E3 ubiquitin ligase activity. Dgrn displays dynamic subcellular localization, accumulates in the nucleus at times when HES family members are active and limits Hey and HES family activity during sex determination, segmentation and neurogenesis. We show that Dgrn interacts with the Notch signaling pathway by it antagonizing the activity of E(spl)-C proteins. dgrn null mutants are female sterile, producing embryos that arrest development after two or three nuclear divisions. These mutant embryos exhibit fragmented or decondensed nuclei and accumulate higher levels of SUMO-conjugated proteins, suggesting a role for Dgrn in genome stability.

Molecular titration and ultrasensitivity in regulatory networks

Protein sequestration occurs when an active protein is sequestered by a repressor into an inactive complex. Using mathematical and computational modeling, we show how this regulatory mechanism (called "molecular titration") can generate ultrasensitive or "all-or-none" responses that are equivalent to highly cooperative processes. The ultrasensitive nature of the input-output response is mainly determined by two parameters: the dimer dissociation constant and the repressor concentration. Because in vivo concentrations are tunable through a variety of mechanisms, molecular titration represents a flexible mechanism for generating ultrasensitivity. Using physiological parameters, we report how details of in vivo protein degradation affect the strength of the ultrasensitivity at steady state. Given that developmental systems often transduce signals into cell-fate decisions on timescales incompatible with steady state, we further examine whether molecular titration can produce ultrasensitive responses within physiologically relevant time intervals. Using Drosophila somatic sex determination as a developmental paradigm, we demonstrate that molecular titration can generate ultrasensitivity on timescales compatible with most cell-fate decisions. Gene duplication followed by loss-of-function mutations can create dominant negatives that titrate and compete with the original protein. Dominant negatives are abundant in gene regulatory circuits, and our results suggest that molecular titration might be generating an ultrasensitive response in these networks.

A Theoretical Model for the Regulation of Sex-lethal, a Gene That Controls Sex Determination and Dosage Compensation in Drosophila melanogaster

Cell fate commitment relies upon making a choice between different developmental pathways and subsequently remembering that choice. Experimental studies have thoroughly investigated this central theme in biology for sex determination. In the somatic cells of Drosophila melanogaster, Sex-lethal (Sxl) is the master regulatory gene that specifies sexual identity. We have developed a theoretical model for the initial sex-specific regulation of Sxl expression. The model is based on the well-documented molecular details of the system and uses a stochastic formulation of transcription. Numerical simulations allow quantitative assessment of the role of different regulatory mechanisms in achieving a robust switch. We establish on a formal basis that the autoregulatory loop involved in the alternative splicing of Sxl primary transcripts generates an all-or-none bistable behavior and constitutes an efficient stabilization and memorization device. The model indicates that production of a small amount of early Sxl proteins leaves the autoregulatory loop in its off state. Numerical simulations of mutant genotypes enable us to reproduce and explain the phenotypic effects of perturbations induced in the dosage of genes whose products participate in the early Sxl promoter activation.

Structure, function and evolution of sex-determining systems in Dipteran insects

Nature has evolved an astonishing variety of genetic and epigenetic sex-determining systems which all achieve the same result, the generation of two sexes. Genetic and molecular analyses, mainly performed during the last 20 years, have gradually revealed the mechanisms that govern sexual differentiation in a few model organisms. In this review, we will introduce the sex-determining system of Drosophila and compare the fruitfly to the housefly Musca domestica and other Dipteran insects. Despite the ostensible variety, all these insects use the same basic strategy: a primary genetic signal that is different in males and females, a key gene that responds to the primary signal, and a double-switch gene that eventually selects between two alternative sexual programmes. These parallels, however, do not extend to the molecular level. Except for the double-switch gene doublesex at the end of the cascade, no functional homologies were found between more distantly related insects. In particular, Sex-lethal, the key gene that controls sexual differentiation in Drosophila, does not have a sex-determining function in any other genus studied so far. These results show that sex-determining cascades, in comparison to other regulatory pathways, evolve much more rapidly.

Vive la différence: males vs females in flies vs worms

For 600 million years, the two best-understood metazoan species, the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans and fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster, have developed independent strategies for solving a biological problem faced by essentially all metazoans: how to generate two sexes in the proper proportions. The genetic program for sexual dimorphism has been a major focus of research in these two organisms almost from the moment they were chosen for study, and it may now be the best-understood general aspect of their development. In this review, we compare and contrast the strategies used for sex determination (including dosage compensation) between "the fly" and "the worm" and the way this understanding has come about. Although no overlap has been found among the molecules used by flies and worms to achieve sex determination, striking similarities have been found in the genetic strategies used by these two species to differentiate their sexes.

scute (sis-b) function in Drosophila sex determination

The primary sex determination signal, the X chromosome-to-autosome (X/A) ratio, controls the choice of sexual identity in the Drosophila melanogaster embryo by regulating the activity of the early promoter of the Sex-lethal gene, Sxl-Pe. This promoter is activated in females (2X/2A), while it remains off in males (1X/2A). Promoter activation in females is dependent upon X-linked numerator genes. One of these genes, sisterless-b (sis-b), corresponds to the scute (sc) locus of the achaete-scute complex, and it encodes a helix-loop-helix transcription factor. In the studies reported here we have used monoclonal antibodies to study the expression and functioning of the sc(sis-b) protein. Sc is first detected at nuclear cycle 6 to 7, well before Sxl-Pe is first active. At this stage, the protein is in the cytoplasm, not the nucleus. Only after the formation of the syncytial blastoderm, at nuclear cycle 10 to 11, does a substantial fraction of the protein enter the nucleus, and this nuclear import closely coincides with the initial activation of Sxl-Pe. Consistent with the idea that the dose of sc(sis-b) is critical for its function as an X-chromosome counting element, wild-type syncytial blastoderm embryos could be grouped into two classes based on the level of protein. Western blot (immunoblot) analysis demonstrates that this difference in protein level correlates directly with the activity state of the Sxl gene. Finally, we provide the first direct evidence that Sc forms heteromeric complexes in vivo in early embryos with the maternally derived helix-loop-helix protein Daughterless. This in vivo complex is likely to be critical for Sc function in Sxl-Pe activation.

Protein-protein interactions among components of the Drosophila primary sex determination signal

Sex determination in Drosophila melanogaster is initiated in the early embryo by a signal provided by three types of genes: (1) X-linked numerator elements [e.g., sisterless-a (sis-a) and sisterless-b (sis-b)], (2) autosomally linked denominator elements [e.g., deadpan (dpn)], and (3) maternal factors [e.g., daughterless (da)]. This signal acts to stimulate transcription from an embryo-specific promoter of the master regulatory gene Sex-lethal (Sxl) in embryos that have two X chromosomes (females), while it fails to activate Sxl in those with only one X (males). It has been previously proposed that competitive dimerizations among the components of this signal might provide the molecular basis for this sex specificity. Here, we use the yeast two-hybrid system to demonstrate specific protein-protein interactions among the above-mentioned factors, and to delimit their interacting domains. These results support and extend the model of the molecular basis of the X/A ratio signal.

Multiple response elements in the Sex-lethal early promoter ensure its female-specific expression pattern

The choice of sexual identity in somatic tissues of the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster is determined early in embryogenesis by the X-chromosome-to-autosome (X/A) ratio. The system that signals the X/A ratio selects the sexual development pathway by determining the activity state of the binary switch Sex-lethal (Sxl). In 2X/2A animals, the X/A signalling system turns the Sxl gene on, ultimately activating an RNA-splicing autoregulatory feedback loop which serves to maintain the female state during the remainder of development. In 1X/2A animals, this autoregulatory feedback loop is not activated and the male state is subsequently maintained by the default splicing machinery. In the studies reported here, we have examined how the X/A signalling system controls the initial choice of sexual identity through its action on a special early embryonic Sxl promoter, Sxl-Pe. We show that in the early embryo, the activity of Sxl-Pe is controlled in a highly dose-sensitive fashion by the genes on the X chromosome that function as numerator elements and by genes located on the autosomes that function as denominator elements. Functional dissection of Sxl-Pe indicates that activating the promoter in females requires the cumulative action of multiple numerator genes which appear to exert their effects through reiterated cis-acting target sites in the promoter. Conversely, maintaining the promoter silent in males requires the repressive activities of denominator genes, and at least one of the denominator genes also appears to function through target sequences within the promoter.

Identification of a candidate primary sex determination locus, fox-1, on the X chromosome of Caenorhabditis elegans

Sex in Caenorhabditis elegans (XX hermaphrodite, XO male) is determined by the X:A ratio, which is the ratio of X chromosome number to autosomal set number. Recent genetic results with X chromosome duplications have suggested that there may be only a small number of major numerator sites on the X chromosome that contribute to this ratio. Mapping of duplication endpoints delimited a region of less than 300 kb, likely to contain one such element. Cosmid clones from this region were tested for numerator activity by constructing transgenic lines carrying extra copies of each tested cosmid. Most cosmid arrays have no effect on the viability of either XX or XO animals. One cosmid array was found to be viable in XX animals, but lethal and feminizing in XO animals, consistent with it containing a major numerator element. Further experiments defined a region of 12–30 kb with apparent numerator activity, which is designated fox-1, ‘Feminizing locus On X’. A cDNA clone hybridizing across part of this region encodes a predicted RNA-binding protein.

Sex determination and dosage compensation: lessons from flies and worms

In both Drosophila melanogaster and Caenorhabditis elegans somatic sex determination, germline sex determination, and dosage compensation are controlled by means of a chromosomal signal known as the X:A ratio. A variety of mechanisms are used for establishing and implementing the chromosomal signal, and these do not appear to be similar in the two species. Instead, the study of sex determination and dosage compensation is providing more general lessons about different types of signaling pathways used to control alternative developmental states of cells and organisms.

Sex determination in Drosophila melanogaster: X-linked genes involved in the initial step of sex-lethal activation

Sex determination is the commitment of an embryo to either the female or the male developmental pathway. The ratio of X chromosomes to sets of autosomes is the primary genetic signal that determines sex in Drosophila, by triggering the functional state of the gene Sex-lethal: in females (2X;2A) Sxl will be ON, whereas in males (X;2A) Sxl will be OFF. Genetic and molecular studies have defined a set of genes involved in the formation of the X:A signal, as well as other genes, with either maternal or zygotic effects, which are also involved in regulating the initial step of Sex-lethal activation. We review these data and present new data on two more regions of the X chromosome that define other genes needed for Sxl activation. In addition, we report on the interaction between some of the genes regulating Sxl activation.

The Drosophila sex determination signal: how do flies count to two?

Seventy years after the discovery that sex in Drosophila melanogaster is determined by the balance between X chromosomes and autosomes, we can finally identify some of the specific genes whose relative dosage is responsible for the male/female decision in somatic cells and study how they act at the molecular level. Discovery of these sex determination genes was delayed because their mutant phenotypes were unanticipated. It now seems appropriate to consider how the concept of the X/A balance may have limited thinking about the fruit fly sex determination signal.

The Drosophila 78C early late puff contains E78, an ecdysone-inducible gene that encodes a novel member of the nuclear hormone receptor superfamily

We report the molecular definition of an early late puff locus, at position 78C, that is inducible by ecdysone at the onset of Drosophila metamorphosis. This puff contains a single ecdysone-inducible gene consisting of two nested transcription units, E78A and E78B. E78A mRNA is expressed during a brief interval in mid-pupal development and encodes a novel member of the nuclear hormone receptor superfamily. E78B encodes a truncated receptor isoform that lacks the DNA-binding domain and is predominantly expressed at puparium formation and immediately following E78A in pupae. E78B is directly inducible by ecdysone in late third instar larvae and depends on ecdysone-induced protein synthesis for its maximal level of expression. These observations indicate that E78 represents a distinct subset of early ecdysone-inducible regulatory genes.

A bZIP protein, sisterless-a, collaborates with bHLH transcription factors early in Drosophila development to determine sex

Sexual identity in Drosophila is determined by zygotic X-chromosome dose. Two potent indicators of X-chromosome dose are sisterless-a (sis-a) and sisterless-b (sis-b). Genetic analysis has shown that a diplo-X dose of these genes activates their regulatory target, the feminizing switch gene Sex-lethal (Sxl), whereas a haplo-X dose leaves Sxl inactive. sis-b encodes a transcriptional activator of the bHLH family that dimerizes with several other HLH proteins required for the proper assessment of X dose. Here, we report that sis-a encodes a bZIP protein homolog that functions in all somatic nuclei to activate Sxl transcription. In contrast with other elements of the sex-determination signal, the functioning of this transcription factor in somatic cells may be specific to X-chromosome counting. Using in situ hybridization, we determined the time course of sis-a, sis-b, and Sxl transcription during the first few hours after fertilization. The pattern of sis-a RNA accumulation is very similar to that for sis-b, with a peak in nuclear cycle 12 at about the time of onset of Sxl transcription. Considered in the context of other studies, these results suggest that the ability to distinguish one X from two is attributable to combinatorial interactions between bZIP and bHLH proteins and their target, Sxl, as well as to positive and negative interactions with maternally supplied and zygotically produced proteins.

A cellular factor stimulates the DNA-binding activity of MyoD and E47

We show that mixing purified MyoD and E47 proteins results in heterodimers that fail to bind DNA, even though MyoD and E47 homodimers can bind DNA efficiently. Addition of cell extracts or a specific fraction from a cell extract enables the heterodimer to bind DNA, but components in this fraction fail to enter the DNA complex. The activity is sensitive to heat and protease and is not ATP-dependent. The activity functions on E47 and MyoD homodimers and can stimulate DNA binding of the basic-helix-loop-helix region of MyoD. The effectiveness of the activity, for MyoD homodimers, depends on the exact DNA sequence of the binding site. Our results suggest that specific factors in the cell might control the DNA-binding properties of helix-loop-helix proteins.