The association between a positive T and B cell flow cytometry crossmatch and renal transplant failure

Desensitization for solid organ and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Desensitization protocols are being used worldwide to enable kidney transplantation across immunologic barriers, i.e. antibody to donor HLA or ABO antigens, which were once thought to be absolute contraindications to transplantation. Desensitization protocols are also being applied to permit transplantation of HLA mismatched hematopoietic stem cells to patients with antibody to donor HLA, to enhance the opportunity for transplantation of non-renal organs, and to treat antibody-mediated rejection. Although desensitization for organ transplantation carries an increased risk of antibody-mediated rejection, ultimately these transplants extend and enhance the quality of life for solid organ recipients, and desensitization that permits transplantation of hematopoietic stem cells is life saving for patients with limited donor options. Complex patient factors and variability in treatment protocols have made it difficult to identify, precisely, the mechanisms underlying the downregulation of donor-specific antibodies. The mechanisms underlying desensitization may differ among the various protocols in use, although there are likely to be some common features. However, it is likely that desensitization achieves a sort of immune detente by first reducing the immunologic barrier and then by creating an environment in which an autoregulatory process restricts the immune response to the allograft.

Relevance of Posttransplant Flow Cytometric T- and B-cell Crossmatches in Tacrolimus-Treated Renal Transplant Patients

BACKGROUND

De novo development of anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies after transplantation is associated with increased rejection and decreased graft survival. In this study, the effect of posttransplant HLA antibodies on clinical outcome was evaluated in patients treated with tacrolimus by means of flow cytometric crossmatches (FCXm).

METHODS

T- and B-cell FCXm were performed retrospectively on posttransplant sera of patients who received a graft between 1997 and 1999. Ninety-four kidney-only recipients were tested and all FCXm positive sera were investigated for the presence of HLA class I and II antibodies by Flow panel reactive antibodies.

RESULTS

From 94 patients with a negative pretransplant complement-dependent cytotoxicity crossmatch, seven (7%) showed a positive pretransplant FCXm. After transplantation the FCXm became positive in five patients (6%). The predictive value of a positive FCXm after transplantation, and the log-transformed relative change in fluorescence ratio between pretransplant and posttransplant serum, were not significant to rejection within six months, nor to graft survival censored for death.

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of HLA antibodies before rejection or graft failure could only be shown in a minority of patients; most antibodies were detected after graft failure, especially after transplantectomy. Monitoring through antibody testing after transplantation on the basis of our results has no added value with tacrolimus-based immunosuppression.

Specific and durable elimination of antibody to donor HLA antigens in renal-transplant patients

BACKGROUND

Donor-specific antibody (DSA) is the major barrier to success of kidney transplants. Attempts to deal with this problem have used plasmapheresis to remove antibodies or high-dose pooled immunoglobulin (IVIg) to down-regulate DSA. However, elimination of antibodies by these methods has been limited in duration or scope.

METHODS

We have confirmed the presence of immunoglobulin (Ig)G antibody to one or more donor HLA antigens in 49 patients treated with alternate-day, single-volume plasmapheresis followed by low-dose cytomegalovirus (CMV) hyperimmune globulin (CMV-Ig) combined with quadruple immunosuppression. We examined the effect of the treatment protocol on antibodies to donor HLA, third-party HLA, and nominal antigens.

RESULTS

At the end of treatment, 63% of patients had lost antibody to donor HLA, whereas only 27% had lost antibody to third-party HLA (P<0.001). More strikingly, loss of antibody to donor and third-party HLA antigens occurred in 89% and 19%, respectively, of patients followed for 2 or more months after end of treatment (P<0.0001). No elimination of antiviral antibodies tested was seen. With one exception, elimination of DSA appeared to be independent of antibody titer or specificity, the number of different antibody specificities, or whether or not the target antigen was a repeat mismatch. The effect appears to be long lasting, with no return of DSA observed in patients followed for an average of 13 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Plasmapheresis and low-dose CMV-Ig combined with traditional immunosuppression is effective in producing a specific and durable elimination of antibody to donor HLA.

B-Cell crossmatching and kidney allograft outcome in 9031 United States transplant recipients

The predictive power of a positive B-cell crossmatch remains controversial due to the presence of cofactors, such as sensitization and human leukocyte antigen (HLA) mismatch levels. UNOS OPTN/Scientific Registry data were analyzed on 9031 cadaveric kidney graft recipients who were B-cell crossmatched during 1994 and 1995 for graft outcome. This 2-year time period was chosen so that most US transplant recipients in this study would have had a similar regimen of immunosuppression consisting of prednisone, Sandimmune, and azathioprine The two patient groups that were analyzed were B-pos (n = 336) and B-neg (n = 8,695). All T-cell crossmatches were negative. Data analyzed included donor-recipient demographics, sensitization levels, B-cell crossmatch techniques, histocompatibility mismatching, graft rejection incidence, early graft loss, cause of graft failure, and statistical analyses (univariate and multivariate) in primary and repeat graft recipients. Significant factors in both crossmatch groups included pretransplant transfusions, peak and most recent class I PRA levels, a previous kidney graft, histocompatibility mismatching at HLA-A plus -B, urine in first 24 h, and rejection incidence between discharge and 6 months post-transplantation. Class II antibody specificities and panel reactive antibody (PRA) levels were not available from the UNOS database. Fifty-seven percent of 15,896 (1994-1995) transplant recipients (n 9031) were B-cell crossmatched, and 336 of 9031 recipients (3.7%) were transplanted with a B-pos crossmatch. Sixteen percent of B-pos recipients experienced early graft loss (< 6 months) compared with 11% of B-neg recipients (p < 0.001). Both primary and repeat grafts with B-pos crossmatches experienced an increase in rejection incidence (p = 0.023) and early graft loss (p < 0.001). In the sensitized (PRA > 10%) recipient subset (n = 2,789), both primary (n = 93) and regraft (n = 52) recipients with B-pos crossmatches had a higher incidence of early graft loss at 3 months, p < 0.001 and p = 0.016, respectively. HLA-DR mismatch levels in both patient groups were not different (p = 0.109). There was a 68% increase in the odds of 3-month graft loss in B-pos versus B-neg recipients (multivariate logistic regression analysis p = 0.054, 95% confidence interval 0.99-2.85). In conclusion, a B-pos crossmatch in primary and regraft recipients, including a sensitized subset, is predictive of inferior kidney graft outcome.

A retrospective flow cytometric crossmatch study in transplant recipients with autoreactive lymphocytotoxic antibodies

Our previous data shows renal transplant recipients with autoreactive lymphocytotoxic antibodies to have a reduced transplant survival when compared to patients without autoantibodies. This could have been due to the presence of weak IgG antibodies inhibited by the dithiothreitol used to remove IgM antibodies in the pretransplant cytotoxicity crossmatch. That possibility was investigated in a retrospective study of 52 recipients of 57 renal transplants who were recrossmatched using a more sensitive flow cytometry crossmatch (FCXM) to detect recipient IgG antibodies to donor T and/or B cell splenic lymphocytes. Fourteen of the 57 (24%) transplants failed. Six losses were within the 1st month posttransplant and four of these were immunological failures. None of the transplant failures had a positive pretransplant FCXM. These results showed that the recipients with autoantibodies did not have pretransplant IgG anti-donor antibodies. The transplant failures did not, therefore, relate to the presence of antibodies undetected by the dithiothreitol-treated cytotoxicity crossmatch.

Effect of recipient sensitization (peak PRA) on graft outcome in haploidentical living related kidney transplants

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the influence of pre-transplant recipient sensitization on the outcome of 1-haploidentical live related donor (LRD) kidney transplants.

METHOD

We reviewed 141 consecutive cyclosporine-treated adult haploidentical first transplants for which panel reactive antibody (PRA) levels were available. Patients were divided into three groups according to their peak PRA levels: group I, PRA = 0 (n = 97); group II, PRA = 1-50% (n = 24); and group III, PRA = 51-100% (n = 20).

RESULTS

Differences in PRA were associated with significant differences in short- and longer-term graft survival, unrelated to patient survival. Graft survival at 1, 3, and 5 yr was only 74, 40, and 27% in group III, compared to 92, 87, and 52% in group II, and 96, 91, and 85% in group I (p < 0.001). Increasing PRA was associated with shorter time-to-graft failure. In group III, 20% lost their transplant from acute rejection in the first 6 months, versus 4% in group II and 3% in group I (p < 0.01). Graft survival in group II diverged from that of group I only after 3 yr, due to an increase in loss from chronic rejection. Hospitalization was longer in group III, in association with a significantly higher incidence of acute rejection during the first 3 months after transplantation (p < 0.02). Serum creatinine was higher in sensitized than nonsensitized patients at all time points.

CONCLUSIONS

Sensitization has a significant negative impact on the outcome of haploidentical LRD kidney transplants. Sensitized potential recipients and their potential donors should be aware of this in arriving at informed decision-making for transplantation. These patients may benefit from more sensitive cross-match testing, more intense or more novel immunosuppression, or immunomodulation to modify their immune responsiveness.

Evaluation of the flow cytometric crossmatch. Preliminary results of a multicenter study

The flow cytometric crossmatch is a technique that is increasingly being used by clinical transplant laboratories. In this multicenter study by the British Society for Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics Flow Cytometry Group, a series of crossmatches were carried out to determine whether different centers obtained same results when performing the same crossmatch. There was greater than 80% agreement among participating laboratories on the results of 35/54 tests. There was no clear agreement in the remaining 20 cases. Quantitative analysis, estimating the number of cell-bound fluorescein molecules, demonstrated that differences in the criteria used by each center to define a positive crossmatch were responsible for some discordant results. When applied, definition of positivity based on the molecules of fluorescein increased concordance from 57.5% to 81.4%.l. These results suggest that a criterion for the interpretation of results based on quantitative analysis of bound antibody may be more reliable than methods in current routine use.

Importance of minimizing HLA-DR mismatch and cold preservation time in cadaveric renal transplantation

Univariate and multivariate analyses have been performed on donor an d recipient variables to determine possible effects on the outcome of 516 primary cadaveric renal transplants performed in our single center from 1989 until 1993. The overall actuarial patient survival at 1 year and 5 years was 94.4% and 87.4%, respectively; the 1 year and 5 year graft survival rates were 88.3% and 77.8%, respectively. A total of 95 grafts were lost; death with function (35%) and chronic rejection (22%) were the major causes. Three variables (HLA-DR mismatch, delayed graft function, and prolonged cold ischemia time) had a significant detrimental effect on both short- and long-term graft survival. Zero HLA-DR mismatched grafts showed significantly enhanced survival over those with 1 HLA-DR mismatch both at 1 year (92.8% vs. 84.5%) and at 5 years (88.3% vs. 73.9%) only if cold ischemia time was less than 26 hours (P=0.0009). Occurrence of delayed graft function significantly lowered graft survival at both 1 year and 5 years (P=0.002), and the incidence was significantly associated with prolonged cold ischemia time (P<0.0001). HLA-A or HLA-B matching, percentage panel reactive antibodies (PRA), and anastomosis time showed no independent effect on long-term survival. The small number of 2 HLA-DR mismatched grafts (n=6) precluded separate analysis of this group. Acute rejection accounted for 12% of losses but had no statistically significant effect on graft survival, even though an increased frequency of rejection episodes was significantly associated with HLA-DR mismatch (P<0.0001). These results would suggest that significant survival benefits may be achieved by prospective HLA matching if cold ischemia times are limited. The efficiency of organ sharing must he improved to make optimal use of a limited resource.