Comparison of the effects of visible femtosecond laser pulses and continuous wave laser radiation of low average intensity on the clonogenicity of Escherichia coli

Non-mammalian Hosts and Photobiomodulation: Do All Life-forms Respond to Light?

Photobiomodulation (PBM), also known as low-level laser (light) therapy, was discovered over 50 years ago, but only recently has it been making progress toward wide acceptance. PBM originally used red and near-infrared (NIR) lasers, but now other wavelengths and non-coherent light-emitting diodes (LEDs) are being explored. The almost complete lack of side effects makes the conduction of controlled clinical trials relatively easy. Laboratory research has mainly concentrated on mammalian cells (normal or cancer) in culture, and small rodents (mice and rats) as models of different diseases. A sizeable body of work was carried out in the 1970s and 1980s in Russia looking at various bacterial and fungal cells. The present review covers some of these studies and a recent number of papers that have applied PBM to so-called "model organisms." These models include flies (Drosophila), worms (Caenorhabditis elegans), fish (zebrafish) and caterpillars (Galleria). Much knowledge about the genomics and proteomics, and many reagents for these organisms already exist. They are inexpensive to work with and have lower regulatory barriers compared to vertebrate animals. Other researchers have studied different models (snails, sea urchins, Paramecium, toads, frogs and chickens). Plants may respond to NIR light differently from visible light (photosynthesis and photomorphogenesis) but PBM in plants has not been much studied. Veterinarians routinely use PBM to treat non-mammalian patients. The conclusion is that red or NIR light does indeed have significant biologic effects conserved over many different kingdoms, and perhaps it is true that "all life-forms respond to light."

Effects of low-power light therapy on wound healing: LASER x LED

Several studies demonstrate the benefits of low-power light therapy on wound healing. However, the use of LED as a therapeutic resource remains controversial. There are questions regarding the equality or not of biological effects promoted by LED and LASER. One objective of this review was to determine the biological effects that support the use of LED on wound healing. Another objective was to identify LED´s parameters for the treatment of wounds. The biological effects and parameters of LED will be compared to those of LASER. Literature was obtained from online databases such as Medline, PubMed, Science Direct and Scielo. The search was restricted to studies published in English and Portuguese from 1992 to 2012. Sixty-eight studies in vitro and in animals were analyzed. LED and LASER promote similar biological effects, such as decrease of inflammatory cells, increased fibroblast proliferation, stimulation of angiogenesis, granulation tissue formation and increased synthesis of collagen. The irradiation parameters are also similar between LED and LASER. The biological effects are dependent on irradiation parameters, mainly wavelength and dose. This review elucidates the importance of defining parameters for the use of light devices.

Risk estimation of skin damage due to ultrashort pulsed, focused near-infrared laser irradiation at 800 nm

New imaging techniques using near-infrared (NIR) femtosecond lasers (fs-lasers) in multiphoton laser scanning microscopy (MPLSM) have great potential for in vivo applications, particularly in human skin. However, little is known about possible risks. In order to evaluate the risk, a "biological dosimeter" was used. We irradiated fresh human skin samples with both an fs-laser and a solar simulator UV source (SSU). DNA damage introduced in the epidermis was evaluated using fluorescent antibodies against cyclobutane-pyrimidin-dimers (CPDs) in combination with immunofluorescence image analysis. Four fs-irradiation regimes (at 800-nm wavelength) were evaluated differing in laser power and step width of horizontal scans. Fs-irradiation did not give CPDs at 15-mW or 30-mW irradiation power using 10 horizontal scans every 5 microns. CPDs could be seen at 60-mW laser power and 5-microm step size and at 35-mW using 1-micron step width. Quantitative comparison of SSU-induced CPDs showed that the 60-mW laser irradiation regime is comparable to UV-irradiation, giving 0.6 minimal erythemal dose (MED). The 1-micron irradiation regime was comparable to 0.45 MED. Under these experimental conditions, the risk of DNA damage due to fs-laser irradiation on skin is in the range of natural UV-exposure.

Induction of phr gene expression in E. coli strain KY706/pPL-1 by He-Ne laser (632.8 nm) irradiation

We have observed that He-Ne laser irradiation of E. coli strain KY706/pPL-1 leads to induction of photolyase gene, phr. The magnitude of induction was found to depend on the He-Ne laser fluence, fluence rate and post-irradiation incubation period in the nutrient medium. The optimum values for fluence and fluence rate were 7x10(3) J/m(2) and 100 W/m(2), respectively, and the induction of phr gene was observed to saturate beyond an incubation period of approximately 2 h. Experiments carried out with singlet oxygen quenchers and with D(2)O suggest that the effect is mediated via singlet oxygen. Photoreactivation studies carried out after UVC exposure of both the He-Ne laser-exposed as well as unexposed cells showed a larger surviving fraction in the He-Ne laser pre-irradiated cells. This can be attributed to He-Ne laser irradiation-induced induction of phr expression. However, since even without photoreactivating light He-Ne laser pre-irradiated cells show higher survival against UVC radiation it appears that He-Ne laser irradiation induces both light-dependent as well as dark DNA repair processes.

Non-coherent visible and infrared radiation increase survival to UV (254 nm) in Escherichia coli K12

Interactions between visible or infrared (IR) and ultraviolet (UV, 254 nm) radiation have been studied in E. coli. Pre-illumination with non-coherent monochromatic 446, 466, 570 and 685 nm radiation, as well as with polychromatic red and IR radiation at room temperature, leads to increased cell survival after a subsequent irradiation with UV light. In the thermic range of the spectrum (red and IR), IR but not red light pre-treatment is able to increase cell survival to a subsequent lethal heat (51 degrees C) challenge, suggesting that increased UV survival may be due to IR-induced heat-shock response. On the other hand, visible-light-induced resistance may be due to a different mechanism, possibly involved with unknown bacterial light receptors.

Role of ground and excited singlet state oxygen in the red light-induced stimulation of Escherichia coli cell growth

Irradiation of selected Escherichia coli defective strains with red-light induces a stimulation of the cell growth rate. Such effect is wavelength-dependent and is accompanied by a transient increase of the cell volume and some enzymic activities. The presence of oxygen appears to be essential for the occurrence of a significant photostimulatory effect. The results obtained upon irradiation in the presence of quenchers (tryptophan, histidine, azide) or enhancers (deuterium oxide) of singlet oxygen (1O2) strongly suggest that this activated oxygen derivative is generated by excitation of endocellular chromophores (possibly cytochromes). The reaction of 1O2 with nearby cellular targets could induce a sublethal cell damage which in turn promotes an accelerated cell metabolism.

Primary and secondary mechanisms of action of visible to near-IR radiation on cells

Cytochrome c oxidase is discussed as a possible photoacceptor when cells are irradiated with monochromatic red to near-IR radiation. Four primary action mechanisms are reviewed: changes in the redox properties of the respiratory chain components following photoexcitation of their electronic states, generation of singlet oxygen, localized transient heating of absorbing chromophores, and increased superoxide anion production with subsequent increase in concentration of the product of its dismutation, H2O2. A cascade of reactions connected with alteration in cellular homeostasis parameters (pHi, [Cai], cAMP, Eh, [ATP] and some others) is considered as a photosignal transduction and amplification chain in a cell (secondary mechanisms).

Non-coherent near infrared radiation protects normal human dermal fibroblasts from solar ultraviolet toxicity

The sun is the most important and universal source of non-ionizing radiation shed on human populations. Life evolved on Earth bathed by this radiation. Solar UV damages cells, leading to deleterious conditions such as photoaging and carcinogenesis in human skin. During the process of evolution, the cells selected dark- and light-dependent repair mechanisms as a defence against these hazardous effects. This study describes the induction by non-coherent infrared radiation (700-2000 nm), in the absence of rising temperature, of a strong cellular defense against solar UV cytotoxicity as well as induction of cell mitosis. Blocking mitoses with arabinoside-cytosine or protein synthesis with cycloheximide did not abolish the protection, leading to the conclusion that this protection is independent of cell division and of protein neosynthesis. The protection provided by infrared radiation against solar UV radiation is shown to be a long-lasting (at least 24 h) and cumulatif phenomenon. Infrared radiation does not protect the lipids in cellular membranes against UVA induced peroxidation. The protection is not mediated by heat shock proteins. Living organisms on the Earth's surface are bathed by infrared radiation every day, before being submitted to solar UV. Thus, we propose that this as yet undescribed natural process of cell protection against solar UV, acquired and preserved through evolutional selection, plays an important role in life maintenance. Understanding and controlling this mechanism could provide important keys to the prevention of solar UV damage of human skin.

Does low-intensity He-Ne laser radiation produce a photobiological growth response in Escherichia coli?

A photobiological study was carried out on the bacterium Escherichia coli in order to determine whether stimulation of growth occurred after irradiation of an inoculum with coherent red light. No enhancement or inhibition of growth was observed for cultures of the bacterium following irradiation of inocula with a Helium-neon laser (continuous wave, lambda = 632.8 nm) at irradiances of 7.7 x 10(15) and 1.8 x 10(16) photons cm-2 s-1 using fluences of 4.5 x 10(-1) and 4.5 J cm-2 at each irradiance. Bacterial growth in irradiated and control cultures was monitored during a growth period of ca 2 h using a viable count technique after inocula in the early exponential phase had been diluted with fresh growth medium. These results do not provide support for the work of Karu et al. (1983, Nuov. Cim. 2D, 1138-1144), and Tiphlova and Karu (1988, Photochem. Photobiol. 48, 467-471), which appear to show substantial enhancement of E. coli growth under these conditions.

Two different mechanisms of low-intensity laser photobiological effects on Escherichia coli

Bacterial suspensions in a phosphate buffer were irradiated at wavelengths lambda of 632.8, 1066 and 1286 nm, incubated in Hottinguer broth for 60 min and assayed for viability by the standard surface-plating technique. The difference between the number of viable cells in the irradiated culture and the control was termed growth stimulation. Irradiation of the bacteria with an He-Ne laser (632.8 nm) or semiconductor lasers at 1066 and 1286 nm at various intensities and irradiation times produced two maxima in the growth stimulation vs. dose curve. The first maximum, in all cases, occurred near 50 J m-2, and the reciprocity law was obeyed. The second maximum occurred at an irradiation time of 100 s irrespective of the particular radiation intensity, and the reciprocity law was not obeyed. It is assumed that two different mechanisms are responsible for these two maxima in the growth stimulation vs. dose curve.

Effects of low power 904 nm radiation on rat fibroblasts explanted and in vitro cultured

In this study, 904 nm radiation was used on rat fibroblasts, explanted and in vitro cultured, to verify the action of various factors on cell growth. Parameters which can modify the behaviour of cultured cells, including the pulse repetition rate and the intensity of the radiation, the distance between the source and the irradiated dishes, the daily duration of exposure and the length of treatment, were studied. The most effective values of the intensity and pulse repetition rate which stimulate cell growth were 3 x 10(-4) W m-2 and 1.6 kHz respectively; the best stimulation was obtained at a sample-source distance of 0.1 m. The duration of daily exposure had no significant effect, whereas the best stimulus of cell growth was obtained by extending the treatment to 12 days.

Biochemical and morphological changes in Escherichia coli irradiated by coherent and non-coherent 632.8 nm light

Irradiation of Escherichia coli cells with either coherent or non-coherent 632.8 nm light (4 J cm-2) causes a transient acceleration of cell proliferation, which is maximal about 60 min after the end of the phototreatment. The stimulatory effect is dose dependent and is especially evident in the case of defective E. coli strains which are in the logarithmic phase of growth, while it becomes less important when cells are exposed to non-coherent 600-700 nm light. Stimulated cells exhibit biochemical and morphological changes, such as an intensified synthesis of cytoplasmic membrane proteins, increased cell volume and ribosomal content, which are suggestive of an enhanced cell metabolism.