Prebypass glucose-insulin-potassium infusion in elective nondiabetic coronary artery surgery patients

Cardioprotective Effects of Glucose-Insulin-Potassium Infusion in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

The infusion of glucose-insulin-potassium (GIK) has yielded conflicting results in terms of cardioprotective effects. We conducted a meta-analysis to examine the impact of perioperative GIK infusion in early outcome after cardiac surgery. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were eligible if they examined the efficacy of GIK infusion in adults undergoing cardiac surgery. The main study endpoint was postoperative myocardial infarction (MI) and secondary outcomes were hemodynamics, any complications and hospital resources utilization. Subgroup analyses explored the impact of the type of surgery, GIK composition and timing of administration. Odds ratio (OR) or mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated with a random-effects model. Fifty-three studies (n=6129) met the inclusion criteria. Perioperative GIK infusion was effective in reducing MI (k=32 OR 0.66[0.48, 0.89] P=0.0069), acute kidney injury (k=7 OR 0.57[0.4, 0.82] P=0.0023) and hospital length of stay (k=19 MD -0.89[-1.63, -0.16] days P=0.0175). Postoperatively, the GIK-treated group presented higher cardiac index (k=14 MD 0.43[0.29, 0.57] L/min P<0.0001) and lesser hyperglycemia (k=20 MD -30[-47, -13] mg/dL P=0.0005) than in the usual care group. The GIK-associated protection for MI was effective when insulin infusion rate exceeded 2 mUI/kg/min and after coronary artery bypass surgery. Certainty of evidence was low given imprecision of the effect estimate, heterogeneity in outcome definition and risk of bias. Perioperative GIK infusion is associated with improved early outcome and reduced hospital resource utilization after cardiac surgery. Supporting evidence is heterogenous and further research is needed to standardize the optimal timing and composition of GIK solutions.

Glycemic Control in Coronary Revascularization

OPINION STATEMENT

Hyperglycemia in the setting of coronary revascularization is associated with increased adverse cardiovascular events in patients with or without diabetes mellitus. Data suggest that acute peri-procedural hyperglycemia causes an increase in inflammation, platelet activity, and endothelial dysfunction and is associated with plaque instability and infarct size. While peri-procedural blood glucose level is an independent predictor of adverse outcomes in patients undergoing coronary revascularization, treatment strategies remain uncertain. Randomized clinical trials of glucose-insulin-potassium infusions have consistently shown no benefit, while those comparing insulin therapy versus standard of care have demonstrated mixed results, likely due to the failure to reach euglycemia with these strategies. Although no glucose-lowering agent has been shown to be superior in peri-procedural glycemic control, the continuation of clinically prescribed long-acting glucose-lowering medications in patients with diabetes mellitus prior to coronary angiography and possible percutaneous coronary intervention may be the simplest and most effective approach to maintain euglycemia and decrease the associated increase in inflammation and platelet activity. However, alternative strategies such as therapies targeted at the underlying mechanism of harm (e.g., more potent anti-platelet therapy, anti-inflammatory therapy) should also be considered and warrant further investigation.

Effect of perioperative glucose-insulin-potassium infusions on mortality and atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass grafting: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Glucose-insulin infusions (with potassium [GIK] or without [GI]) have been advocated in the setting of coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery to optimize myocardial glucose use and to minimize ischemic injury.

OBJECTIVE

To conduct a meta-analysis assessing whether the use of GIKGI infusions perioperatively reduce in-hospital mortality or atrial fibrillation (AF) after CABG surgery.

METHODS

Electronic databases (Medline, EMBASE and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials [CENTRAL]) and references of retrieved articles were searched for randomized controlled trials that evaluated the effects of GIK or GI infusions, before or during CABG surgery, on in-hospital mortality andor postoperative AF. Pooled ORs and 95% CIs were calculated for each outcome.

RESULTS

Twenty trials were identified and eligible for review. The summary OR for in-hospital mortality was 0.88 (95% CI 0.56 to 1.40), based on 44 deaths among 2326 patients. While postoperative AF was a more frequent outcome (occurring in 519 of 1540 patients in the 10 trials reporting this outcome), the overall pooled estimate of effect was nonsignificant (OR 0.79, 95% CI 0.54 to 1.15). This latter finding needs to be interpreted cautiously because it is accompanied by significant heterogeneity across trials.

CONCLUSIONS

Perioperative use of GIKGI does not significantly reduce mortality or atrial fibrillation in patients undergoing CABG surgery. Unless future trial data in support of GIKGI infusions become available, the routine use of these treatments in patients undergoing CABG surgery should be discouraged because the safety of these infusions has not been systematically examined.

Effect of perioperative insulin infusion on surgical morbidity and mortality: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.7

OBJECTIVE

To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to evaluate the effect of perioperative insulin infusion on outcomes important to patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We used 6 search strategies including an electronic database search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane CENTRAL, from their inception up to May 1, 2006, and included RCTs of perioperative insulin infusion (with or without glucose targets) measuring outcomes in patients undergoing any surgery. Pairs of reviewers working independently assessed the methodological quality and characteristics of included trials and abstracted data on perioperative outcomes (ie, outcomes that occurred during hospitalization or within 30 days of surgery).

RESULTS

We identified 34 eligible trials. In the 14 trials that assessed mortality, there were 68 deaths among 2192 patients randomized to insulin infusion compared with 98 deaths among 2163 patients randomized to control therapy (random-effects pooled relative risk, 0.69; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.51-0.94; 99% CI, 0.46-1.04; I2, 0%; 95% CI, 0.0%-47.4%). Hypoglycemia increased in the intensively treated group (20 trials, 119/1470 patients in insulin infusion vs 48/1476 patients in control group; relative risk, 2.07; 95% CI, 1.29-3.32; 99% CI, 1.09-3.88; I2, 31.5%; 95% CI, 0.0%-59.0%). No significant effect was seen in any other outcomes. The available mortality data represent only 40% of the optimal information size required to reliably detect a plausible treatment effect; potential methodological and reporting biases weaken inferences.

CONCLUSION

Perioperative insulin infusion may reduce mortality but increases hypoglycemia in patients who are undergoing surgery; however, mortality results require confirmation in large and rigorous RCTs.

Pharmacologic Prophylaxis

New-onset atrial fibrillation (AF) occurs frequently in patients after cardiac surgery. The purpose of this study was to review the published trials and to provide clinical practice guidelines for pharmacologic prophylaxis against postoperative AF. Trials of pharmacologic prophylaxis against AF after heart surgery were identified by searching MEDLINE, the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, and the bibliographies of published reports. Evidence grades and clinical recommendation scores were assigned to each prophylactic drug based on published evidence. Ninety-one trials were identified. The primary study design was a randomized, controlled trial of one drug vs placebo/usual care. Pharmacologic therapies that are reviewed include Vaughan-Williams class II agents (ie, beta-receptor antagonists) [29 trials; 2,901 patients], Vaughan-Williams class III agents (ie, sotalol and amiodarone) [18 trials; 2,978 patients], Vaughan-Williams class IV agents (ie, verapamil and diltiazem) [5 trials; 601 patients], and Vaughan-Williams class I agents (ie, quinidine and procainamide) [3 trials; 246 patients], as well as digitalis (10 trials; 1,401 patients), magnesium (14 trials; 1,853 patients), dexamethasone (1 trial; 216 patients), glucose-insulin-potassium (3 trials; 102 patients), insulin (1 trial; 501 patients), triiodothyronine (2 trials; 301 patients), and aniline (1 trial; 32 patients). A consistent finding in this review is that antiarrhythmic drugs with beta-adrenergic receptor-blocking effects (ie, class II beta-blockers, sotalol, and amiodarone) demonstrated successful prophylaxis. Furthermore, those therapies that did not inhibit beta-receptors generally failed to demonstrate a decreased incidence in postoperative AF. While sotalol and amiodarone have been shown in some studies to be effective, their safety and the incremental prophylactic advantage in comparison with beta-blockers has not been conclusively demonstrated. On the basis of evidence that has been reviewed and graded for quality, it is recommended that strong consideration should be given to the prophylactic administration of Vaughan-Williams class II beta-blocking drugs as a means of lowering the incidence of new-onset post-cardiac surgery AF.

Intraoperative Interventions

A comprehensive evidence review was conducted of the medical literature regarding the relationship between intraoperative interventions and the incidence of postoperative atrial arrhythmias, including, most commonly, atrial fibrillation (AF). Fifteen randomized, controlled studies and one large-scale concurrent cohort study were identified that reported on the following issues: systemic temperature during surgery (one report); "beating heart" surgery vs conventional bypass surgery (three reports); type of myocardial protection (five reports); the use of adjunctive posterior pericardiotomy (one report); the use of thoracic epidural anesthesia (TEA) [two reports]; the use of glucose-insulin-potassium (GIK) solutions (two reports); and the use of heparin-coated circuits for cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) [two reports]. Based on a systematic review of the reported data and an analysis of the quality of the reported data, we recommend the following: (1) that mild hypothermia, rather than moderate hypothermia, may be effective in reducing the frequency of postoperative AF; (2) the use of posterior pericardiotomy may be a useful adjunct to reduce the frequency of postoperative AF; and (3) the use of heparin-coated CPB circuits is associated with less postoperative AF. Because of conflicting or inadequate data, we cannot conclude that the frequency of postoperative AF is affected by (1) the use of beating-heart techniques, (2) the type of myocardial protection strategy used, (3) the use of TEA, or (4) the use of GIK solutions perioperatively.

Glucose-Insulin-Potassium in Cardiac Surgery: A Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Glucose-insulin-potassium therapy (GIK) has been suggested to reduce mortality and improve postoperative recovery after cardiac surgery. We performed a meta-analysis of all randomized studies using GIK in cardiac surgery.

METHODS

A systematic Medline search for all GIK studies in cardiac surgery was carried out. Randomized studies investigating the recovery of contractile function as a primary endpoint were included in the meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Thirty-five GIK trials were identified. Twenty-four studies were excluded because of lack of randomization, supplementary administration of other substances, or due to other primary endpoints. Eleven studies were included with a total of 468 patients who underwent either coronary artery bypass grafting or heart valve replacement. Six studies noted a significant improvement in postoperative recovery. One study demonstrated no effect. In four studies, no comparable statistical analysis was available. GIK patients required similar or lesser doses of catecholamines. From the available data we estimated a weighted mean of relative improvement in postoperative recovery of cardiac index for GIK patients versus controls of 11.4%. Five of 11 studies reported the incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation (AF). AF occurred in 23% (20/86) in GIK versus 42% (36/86) in control patients (p = 0.009).

CONCLUSIONS

The findings indicate that GIK may considerably improve postoperative recovery of contractile function and reduce the incidence of atrial arrhythmias after cardiac surgery. However, several factors limit the power of this analysis and large, randomized multicenter trials are needed to fully assess the efficacy of GIK after cardiac surgery.

Management of atrial fibrillation in the post-cardiac surgery setting

New onset postcardiac surgery AF is a prevalent problem associated with increased morbidity, hospital expense, and length of stay. Those agents that inhibit beta-adrenergic receptors (class II beta-blockers, sotalol, and amiodarone) have been demonstrated to be successful prophylaxis against postoperative AF. Furthermore, those therapies that do not inhibit beta-receptors are not effective prophylactic agents. Until comparative trials demonstrate a significant reduction in postoperative AF without additional adverse effects for sotalol or amiodarone compared with beta-blockers, class II beta-blockers are the preferred prophylactic therapy. If patients are deemed unable to take beta-blockers, amiodarone is likely the best alternative. Although prophylaxis against postoperative AF seems prudent, the impact of prophylactic therapy on length of stay and hospital costs has not been a primary objective of any randomized trial. Furthermore, no studies have compared prophylactic therapy for every patient versus therapy only for those patients who experience AF after heart surgery. In the absence of data from randomized clinical trials, postoperative AF should be managed in a similar fashion to clinical AF with attention to rate control, anticoagulation, and restoration of sinus rhythm.

Therapy with insulin in cardiac surgery: controversies and possible solutions

Insulin has been used in the treatment of patients undergoing cardiac surgery or suffering from acute myocardial infarction. Most of these investigations have demonstrated that the metabolic cocktail consisting of glucose-insulin-potassium (GIK) improves recovery of function and outcome after cardiac surgery and substantially reduces mortality of patients with acute myocardial infarction. There is also evidence suggesting that insulin is not effective under these conditions, as demonstrated in a recent large randomized trial in cardiac surgery. It is therefore not surprising that insulin or GIK is not used routinely in clinical practice. Many hypotheses have been advanced to explain the effects of insulin and GIK but none of them has enjoyed convincing support. In cardiac surgery the many different application protocols described make it difficult to compare the results. The application of GIK after cardiac surgery may be complicated by severe disturbances in glucose or potassium homeostasis. In this article we review the literature in this field, addressing the areas of controversy. We discuss the different mechanisms suggested and we propose potential solutions. We conclude that a multifactorial mechanism is likely to explain the effects of insulin or GIK after ischemia and we propose that in a practical sense the application of high-dose insulin during reperfusion, utilizing a newly described, direct nonmetabolic effect, is a convincing concept. We will further demonstrate our clinical experience in establishing a protocol for putting this concept into clinical practice.

Coronary revascularization: a procedure in transition from on-pump to off-pump? The role of glucose-insulin-potassium revisited in a randomized, placebo-controlled study

OBJECTIVE

To investigate an optimized glucose-insulin-potassium (GIK) solution regimen as an alternate myocardial protective strategy in off-pump coronary artery bypass graft (OP-CAB) surgery and as a supplement to conventional coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery using cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB).

DESIGN

Prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled.

SETTING

Single institution, cardiothoracic specialty hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

Forty-four patients scheduled for elective multivessel coronary artery surgery using either conventional CPB (n = 22) or OP-CAB techniques (n = 22).

INTERVENTIONS

Preischemic, ischemic, and postischemic administration of GIK solution was carried out, optimally dosed to ensure nonesterified fatty acid (NEFA) suppression, and supplemented with magnesium, a glycolytic enzymatic cofactor.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

GIK solution therapy reduced plasma NEFA levels (p < 0.001) in OP-CAB surgery and CPB groups but failed to affect the incidence of non-Q wave perioperative myocardial infarction, incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation, incidence of postoperative infection, reduction in creatinine clearance, or duration of postoperative intensive care unit or hospital length of stay. After adjusting for GIK solution therapy, OP-CAB surgery resulted in significantly less ischemic injury (troponin I >15 microg/L, 19.0% v 91.3%; p = 0.0001) and reduced postoperative infections (14.3% v 43.5%; p = 0.049).

CONCLUSION

GIK solution therapy achieved NEFA suppression and an insignificant trend toward reduced biochemical parameters of ischemic injury in OP-CAB surgery and CPB groups, but no major clinical benefit (perioperative myocardial infarction, intensive care unit length of stay, or hospital length of stay) was shown after elective CABG surgery in low-risk patients. Compared with CPB, OP-CAB surgery significantly reduced ischemic injury and postoperative infections.

The effect of insulin cardioplegia on atrial fibrillation after high-risk coronary bypass surgery: a double-blinded, randomized, controlled trial

Atrial fibrillation after coronary bypass (CABG) surgery is an important cause of morbidity and increased resource utilization. Insulin-enhanced cardioplegia may reduce postoperative arrhythmias by improving aerobic myocardial metabolism and mitigating the deleterious effects of ischemia. We performed a double-blinded, randomized, controlled clinical trial to determine if insulin-enhanced cardioplegia decreases the risk of post-CABG atrial fibrillation in a high-risk patient population. We randomized 501 patients undergoing urgent CABG to receive insulin-enhanced (Humulin R 10 IU/L, Insulin group, n = 243) or standard (Control group, n = 258) blood cardioplegia during cardiopulmonary bypass. Patients were monitored by using continuous electrocardiography for a minimum of 3 days postoperatively. All standard cardiac medications, including beta-adrenergic blockers, were continued postoperatively. Insulin-enhanced cardioplegia did not result in a significant reduction in postoperative atrial fibrillation. Furthermore, we failed to detect a difference in the incidence of conduction defects, ventricular tachycardia, or pacemaker requirements between insulin and placebo patients. Atrial fibrillation was the most common arrhythmia, occurring in 31% of all patients. Independent predictors of atrial fibrillation were elderly age, preoperative atrial fibrillation, and renal insufficiency. Right bundle branch block was the most common conduction abnormality. Predictors of right bundle branch block were elderly age, female sex, and circumflex coronary artery disease. The incidence of postoperative ventricular tachycardia, left bundle branch block, and permanent pacemaker requirement was small. We conclude that insulin-enhanced cardioplegia does not reduce the incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation in high-risk CABG patients.

IMPLICATIONS

We conducted a double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of insulin-enhanced cardioplegia in 501 patients undergoing urgent coronary bypass surgery. Insulin did not decrease the incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation when compared with placebo. We also failed to demonstrate a difference in the incidence of other postoperative arrhythmias between the two groups of patients.

Effects of dobutamine versus insulin on cardiac performance, myocardial oxygen demand, and total body metabolism after coronary artery bypass grafting

OBJECTIVE

The purpose was to study whether the hemodynamic benefit of a catabolic catecholamine (dobutamine) induces a certain oxygen cost for the myocardial energy demand and whether this effect would be less pronounced if an anabolic intervention, such as the administration of insulin, was used.

DESIGN

A prospective and randomized study.

SETTING

A university hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

Investigation of two comparable groups of cardiac patients.

INTERVENTIONS

The interventions were postoperative infusions of dobutamine, 7 micrograms/kg/min, and of insulin, 1.5 U/kg/h, respectively, over a period of 30 minutes.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The effects of the interventions were measured using parameters relating to cardiac work and myocardial oxygen demand. Moreover, parameters relating to total body metabolism were also recorded. In the dobutamine group, cardiac index (CI) and left ventricular stroke work index (LVSWI) increased significantly (p < 0.05) during therapy by 30% and 40%, respectively. Cardiac effort index (CEI) and tension time index (TTI) also increased (p < 0.05) during therapy by 41% and 30%, respectively. However, in the insulin group, CI and LVSWI also increased (p < 0.01 and p < 0.05) during therapy, although to a lesser extent (16% and 14%), but CEI and TTI did not change at all during therapy. Total body CO2 production (VCO2) and O2 consumption (VO2) in the dobutamine group increased (p < 0.05) during therapy by 9% and 11%, respectively, whereas in the insulin group only CO2 production increased (p < 0.05) by 13%. O2 consumption remained unchanged in this group.

CONCLUSIONS

It is concluded that dobutamine as well as insulin administration increase cardiac performance. However, in contrast to dobutamine, insulin does not appear to increase myocardial oxygen demand. Therefore, the anabolic insulin administration may represent a more economic pattern of energy-consuming hemodynamic intervention than does the catabolic catecholamine administration.

Rationale for metabolic support with amino acids and glucose-insulin-potassium (GIK) in cardiac surgery

Myocardial metabolism and the current state of metabolic intervention under conditions relevant to cardiac surgery are reviewed. The rationale for metabolic support differs considerably in various settings of cardiac surgery. Although preventive measures are theoretically attractive, their use in the preoperative setting remains to be clarified. Amino acid enrichment of blood cardioplegia seems to be justified by an abundance of animal experimental data. In the postoperative setting of cardiac surgery, metabolic abnormalities may explain reversible myocardial dysfunction. Further, the combined effects of ischemia and the systemic neuroendocrine response to surgical trauma may adversely affect recovery. Amino acids, particularly glutamate, seem vital for metabolic recovery in this setting. Treating the relative shortage of glutamate occurring during this period by the administration of exogenous glutamate and counteracting the effects of the systemic neuroendocrine stress response by high-dose glucose-insulin-potassium are measures that have been shown to improve the metabolic state of the heart and subsequently myocardial performance.

Glutamate and high-dose glucose-insulin-potassium (GIK) in the treatment of severe cardiac failure after cardiac operations

Postischemic derangement of myocardial metabolism that is further aggravated by the systemic neuroendocrine response to surgical trauma may explain reversible myocardial dysfunction after cardiac surgical procedures. Since 1991, all patients with signs of cardiac failure after operation for ischemic heart disease (45/515 patients) were treated according to our metabolic strategy. Sixteen patients in whom we previously would have considered use of an intraaortic balloon pump were treated by prolonged unloading of the heart with cardiopulmonary bypass, by glutamate infusion, and by high-dose glucose-insulin-potassium. Rapid improvement in hemodynamic performance was seen in the first hour and almost full recovery within 6 hours in the surviving patients (12/16). None of the 3 patients requiring mechanical assist survived. Our early clinical experience suggests that metabolic support with glutamate and high-dose glucose-insulin-potassium is a safe treatment with a high success rate in reversible cardiac failure.