What is a vertebral fracture?

Osteoporotic Fractures: Diagnosis, Evaluation, and Significance From the International Working Group on DXA Best Practices

Osteoporotic fractures, also known as fragility fractures, are reflective of compromised bone strength and are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Such fractures may be clinically silent, and others may present clinically with pain and deformity at the time of the injury. Unfortunately, and even at the time of detection, most individuals sustaining fragility fractures are not identified as having underlying metabolic bone disease and are not evaluated or treated to reduce the incidence of future fractures. A multidisciplinary international working group with representation from international societies dedicated to advancing the care of patients with metabolic bone disease has developed best practice recommendations for the diagnosis and evaluation of individuals with fragility fractures. A comprehensive narrative review was conducted to identify key articles on fragility fractures and their impact on the incidence of further fractures, morbidity, and mortality. This document represents consensus among the supporting societies and harmonizes best practice recommendations consistent with advances in research. A fragility fracture in an adult is an important predictor of future fractures and requires further evaluation and treatment of the underlying osteoporosis. It is important to recognize that most fragility fractures occur in patients with bone mineral density T scores higher than -2.5, and these fractures confirm the presence of skeletal fragility even in the presence of a well-maintained bone mineral density. Fragility fractures require further evaluation with exclusion of contributing factors for osteoporosis and assessment of clinical risk factors for fracture followed by appropriate pharmacological intervention designed to reduce the risk of future fracture. Because most low-trauma vertebral fractures do not present with pain, dedicated vertebral imaging and review of past imaging is useful in identifying fractures in patients at high risk for vertebral fractures. Given the importance of fractures in confirming skeletal fragility and predicting future events, it is recommended that an established classification system be used for fracture identification and reporting.

Corrigendum to how to define an osteoporotic vertebral fracture

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.21037/qims.2019.09.10.].

How to define an osteoporotic vertebral fracture?

A vertebral deformity (VD) is not always a vertebral fracture (VF). Because of lack of a completely satisfactory "gold standard", there is no consensus on the exact definition of a VF. Therefore, it may sometimes be difficult, especially in mild cases, to discriminate the prevalent VF from a non-fracture deformity or short vertebral height (SVH). A combined standardized approach based on qualitative and semiquantitative (SQ) vertebral assessment may be the most option to correctly identify a VD as a VF. However this visual approach for VF identification is subjective, therefore it is mandatory an adequate training and experience of radiologist to reach a good sensitivity and specificity. Vertebral morphometry, objective and reproducible method, could be used only to evaluate the severity of VFs but requires the availability of reference values of vertebral height ratios. There is actually an evidentiary basis for suggesting that a qualitative approach by expert radiologists to morphological vertebral assessment, combined SQ and morphometric methods seem to be the preferred option for the correct diagnosis of VF as endplate or/and cortex fracture (ECF) or severe vertebral height loss.

Misdiagnosis of vertebral fractures on local radiographic readings of the multicentre POINT (Prevalence of Osteoporosis in INTernal medicine) study

BACKGROUND

Osteoporotic vertebral fractures (VFs) are often misdiagnosed because asymptomatic and occurring in the absence of specific trauma. Further, diagnostic assessment of VFs may be suboptimal.

AIM OF THE STUDY

To assess the misdiagnosis of vertebral fractures on local radiographic readings in the cohort of patients enrolled in the POINT study.

METHODS

We enrolled hospitalised patients, admitted for any cause to the Internal Medicine Units of 37 hospitals participating to the cross-sectional previously published POINT study. The assessment of VFs was performed both by local radiologists and by two expert skeletal radiologists, by using semiquantitative method (SQ). To better evaluate mild vertebral deformities, the two central radiologists also used the algorithm-based qualitative assessment (ABQ).

RESULTS

The radiographs of 661 patients (401 females; mean age 75.8±8.0) were evaluated. The inter-reader percent agreement between two central expert radiologists per-vertebra assessment was excellent (99.78%; k=0.984; 95% CI, 0.977-0.991). Central reading identified 318/661 (48.1%) patients with at least one VF. Local and central readings agreed in 502/661 (75.9%) patients, resulting in a fair reproducibility (k=0.52; 95% confidence interval 0.44-0.59). Diagnostic performance parameters of local readings were: sensitivity 76.1%; specificity 75.8%; PPV 74.46%; NPV 77.38%). By examining 9254 vertebrae, central and local readers diagnosed 665 (7.2%) and 562 (6.1%) VFs respectively. Misdiagnosis (102 false positives and 205 false negatives) mainly occurred for mild VFs. Local readings identified correctly 460 out 665 VFs diagnosed by central readings, resulting in sensitivity of 69.2% and PPV of 81.8%.

CONCLUSIONS

Following a standardized protocol of acquisition techniques and of interpretation criteria, an excellent agreement between local and central readings for moderate and severe vertebral fractures resulted. However a significant amount of mild vertebral fractures, that are the most of VFs, were misdiagnosed by local radiologists. In order to improve VFs assessment, the radiologists should be trained and sensitized in relation to the relevant clinical significance of osteoporotic VFs identification.

Epidemiology of Vertebral Fractures

Vertebral fractures are one of the most common fractures associated with skeletal fragility and can cause as much morbidity as hip fractures. However, the epidemiology of vertebral fractures differs from that of osteoporotic fractures at other skeletal sites in important ways, largely because only one quarter to one-third of vertebral fractures are recognized clinically at the time of their occurrence and otherwise require lateral spine imaging to be recognized. This article first reviews the prevalence and incidence of clinical and radiographic vertebral fractures in populations across the globe and secular trends in the incidence of vertebral fracture over time. Next, associations of vertebral fractures with measures of bone mineral density and bone microarchitecture are reviewed followed by associations of vertebral fracture with various textural measures of trabecular bone, including trabecular bone score. Finally, the article reviews clinical risk factors for vertebral fracture and the association of vertebral fractures with morbidity, mortality, and other subsequent adverse health outcomes.

Assessment of radiological vertebral fractures in HIV-infected patients: clinical implications and predictive factors

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical impact of including lateral spine X-ray in the screening of bone diseases in HIV-positive patients.

METHODS

A total of 194 HIV-positive patients underwent dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA), lateral spine X-ray and bone biochemical analysis. Vertebral fractures were identified using a morphometric analysis of X-rays and classified using the semiquantitative scoring system of Genant et al. For each patient, a spine deformity index (SDI) score was calculated by summing the grades of vertebral deformities. Reductions in vertebral body height of > 25% were considered vertebral fractures, and those < 25% were considered vertebral deformities. Risk factors associated with vertebral fractures were evaluated by univariate and multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

Vertebral fractures were detected in 24 patients (12.4%) and vertebral deformities in 17 patients (8.7%); 153 patients (78.9%) did not show any vertebral deformity. Among patients with fractures, only two with SDI > 10 reported lumbar pain; the remaining were asymptomatic. Patients over 50 years old showed a higher prevalence of vertebral fracture [24.4% versus 11.8% in patients 41-50 years old (P = 0.05) and 1.9% in patients ≤ 40 years old (P = 0.04)]. No significant increase in the prevalence according to bone mineral density (BMD) reduction was observed, and 70% of fractures were diagnosed in nonosteoporotic patients. Older age [adjusted odds ratio 1.09; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.03-1.13; P = 0.001] and steroid use (adjusted odds ratio 3.64; 95% CI 1.29-10.3; P = 0.01) were independently associated with vertebral fracture; no association was found with HIV- or highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART)-related variables.

CONCLUSIONS

A prevalence of vertebral fractures of 12.4% was observed in our HIV-positive cohort. Given that two-thirds of fractures occurred in nonosteoporotic patients, spine X-ray may be considered in patients at increased risk, irrespective of BMD; that is, in elderly patients and/or patients using steroids.

Simplified criteria for selecting patients for vertebral fracture assessment

The 2013 Position Development Conference of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry (ISCD) has adopted simplified indications for vertebral fracture assessment (VFA) based on an analysis of the Study of Osteoporotic Fractures (SOF). This showed that a simpler regression model, which included only age, bone mineral density (BMD), and height loss, was able to differentiate women with vertebral fractures from those without vertebral fractures almost as well as more complex models. We aimed to verify these findings in 1228 women referred for BMD testing and determine if the 2013 ISCD indications for VFA would perform as well the 2007 indications. The simple and complex SOF-based models were similar in terms of sensitivity (88.4% vs 89.4%), specificity (44.4% vs 45.5%), positive (25.9% vs 26.5%) and negative (94.5% vs 95.1%) predictive values, and area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUROC) (0.664 vs 0.674). The 2013 and 2007 ISCD VFA indications did not differ significantly in terms of sensitivity (88.2% vs 91.3%), specificity (41.3% vs 37.5%), positive (25.3% vs 22.9%) and negative (93.9% vs 95.5%) predictive values, and AUROC (0.648 vs 0.644). Our study provides support for the use of the simplified 2013 ISCD VFA indications as a practical approach to VFA testing.

Dual-energy CT in vertebral compression fractures: performance of visual and quantitative analysis for bone marrow edema demonstration with comparison to MRI

OBJECTIVE

To prospectively evaluate the performance of virtual non-calcium (VNC) dual-energy CT (DECT) images for the demonstration of trauma-related abnormal marrow attenuation in collapsed and non-collapsed vertebral compression fractures (VCF) with MRI as a reference standard.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty patients presenting with non-tumoral VCF were consecutively and prospectively included in this IRB-approved study, and underwent MRI and DECT of the spine. MR examination served as a reference standard. Two independent readers visually evaluated all vertebrae for abnormal marrow attenuation ("CT edema") on VNC DECT images; specificity, sensitivity, predictive values, intra and inter-observer agreements were calculated. A last reader performed a quantitative evaluation of CT numbers; cut-off values were calculated using ROC analysis.

RESULTS

In the visual analysis, VNC DECT images had an overall sensitivity of 84%, specificity of 97%, and accuracy of 95%, intra- and inter-observer agreements ranged from k = 0.74 to k = 0.90. CT numbers were significantly different between vertebrae with edema on MR and those without (p < 0.0001). Cut-off values provided sensitivity of 85% (77%) and specificity of 82% (74%) for "CT edema" on thoracic (lumbar) vertebrae.

CONCLUSIONS

VNC DECT images allowed an accurate demonstration of trauma-related abnormal attenuation in VCF, revealing the acute nature of the fracture, on both visual and quantitative evaluation.

Utility of heel dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in diagnosing osteoporosis

Although peripheral dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry measurements have been found to predict fractures in population studies of white subjects, little is known about their utility in other races and in patients with greater risk of fracture. In a cross-sectional study of 874 women referred for bone mineral density (BMD) testing, we examined the utility of heel BMD in African-American (AA) compared with Caucasian (CA) women and in women using glucocorticoids. The ability of heel T-score to predict central osteoporosis was similar in AA and CA women (odds ratio [OR] per 1 unit decrease in T-score of 2.79 [95% confidence interval {CI} 2.16-3.60] and 3.15 [95% CI 2.53-3.92], respectively). The association between heel T-score and prevalent vertebral fractures was also similar in the 2 groups (OR 1.46 [95% CI 1.15-1.85] in AA and 1.42 [95% CI 1.16-1.74] in CA). In women using glucocorticoids heel T-score was better than central T-score in predicting vertebral fractures (OR 1.38 [95% CI 1.03-1.85] and 1.22 [95% CI 0.86-1.73], respectively). We conclude that in a multiracial referral population heel BMD predicts central osteoporosis and prevalent vertebral fractures equally well in AA as in CA women and may be better than central BMD in assessing fragility in glucocorticoid users.

Diagnostic performance of vertebral fracture assessment by the lunar iDXA scanner compared to conventional radiography

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of vertebral fracture assessment (VFA) using the Lunar iDXA scanner. Conventional spinal radiographs and images acquired by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) of 350 subjects (269 females, 81 males) were evaluated by two different readers. We visualized 4,476/4,550 (98.4 %) vertebrae from T4 to L4 on VFA images compared to 4,535/4,550 (99.7 %) on radiographs. Among the visualized vertebrae, 205/4,535 (4.5 %) and 190/4,476 (4.2 %) were identified as nonfracture deformities by reading of radiographs and VFA, respectively. Vertebral fractures (VFs) were 231 in 126 patients and 228 in 125 patients by semiquantitative assessment of radiographs (SQ-Rx) and by VFA, respectively. There was excellent agreement between the two techniques and high diagnostic performance of VFA both on a per-vertebra basis (k score = 0.984, 95 % CI 0.972-0.996, sensitivity 98.68 %, specificity 99.91 %, PPV 98.25 %, NPV 99.93 %) and on a per-patient basis (k score = 0.957, 95 % CI 0.925-0.988, sensitivity 96.83 %, specificity 98.66 %, PPV 97.60 %, NPV 98.22 %). In older patients (≥65 years) affected by moderate or severe osteoarthritis, SQ-Rx and VFA identified 96 VFs and 95 versus 90 vertebral deformities, respectively. This study demonstrates that most vertebrae are evaluable using the iDXA scanner, with improved VFA diagnostic performance even in discriminating mild VFs from vertebral deformities. Therefore, VFA may be appropriate as an alternative to conventional radiography in patients at high risk of VF who are undergoing DXA bone densitometry and in the follow-up of osteoporotic patients on treatment.

Vertebral morphometry by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) for osteoporotic vertebral fractures assessment (VFA)

PURPOSE

This study was done to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) compared with conventional radiography for identifying vertebral fractures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 930 postmenopausal women underwent conventional radiography and DXA imaging of the spine. The images were evaluated by two expert skeletal radiologists using the semiquantitative (SQ) method for conventional radiography and the morphometric vertebral fracture assessment (VFA) for DXA.

RESULTS

The SQ method for radiography (SQ-Rx) analysed 99.1% of vertebrae, identifying 442 vertebral fractures; VFA analysed 97.5% vertebrae, detecting 420 vertebral fractures. Agreement between SQ-Rx and VFA reached 98.76%, and the κ-score was 0.96 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.95-0.98]. Assessing the grading of vertebral fractures, agreement reached 97.5% and the κ-score was 0.841 (95% CI, 0.821-0.891). Considering SQ-Rx method as "gold standard", VFA had a sensitivity of 97.85 % and a specificity of 99.81%. The negative (NPV) and positive (PPV) predictive value for VFA were 99.83 % and 98.15%, respectively. Fractures were identified in 251 (27 %) and 242 (26 %) of patients on SQ-Rx and VFA, respectively. On a per-patient basis, the agreement between the two methods was 97% and the κ-score was 0.95 (95% CI, 0.920-0.968). The diagnostic parameters for VFA were 97.23% sensitivity, 98.86% specificity, 97.60% PPV and 98.84% NPV.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated that VFA with DXA may reach a high level of accuracy for diagnosing vertebral fractures, suggesting that VFA should be introduced in the screening of individuals with a risk of osteoporosis and in the follow-up of osteoporotic patients receiving treatment.

Vertebral morphometry by X-ray absorptiometry: which reference data for vertebral heights?

INTRODUCTION

The recent improvement in the resolution of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) images enables most vertebral levels to be seen adequately and thus DXA may be a worthwhile alternative to radiologic morphometry for the identification of vertebral fractures (VF). In this multicenter study, we have derived reference data for vertebral heights and their ratios in Italian women using morphometric X-ray absorptiometry (MXA).

METHODS

DXA scans were acquired in 1254 consecutive pre- and postmenopausal women, (mean age 63.7 ± 11.3, range 26-88 yrs), referred to six osteoporosis centers. MXA analysis of these images was performed by the same operator measuring vertebral heights and height ratios from L4 to T4. We calculated measures of central tendency and dispersion of vertebral heights and vertebral ratios using different approaches (mean and standard deviation as well as median and interquartile range of raw data, mean and standard deviation of trimmed data using an iterative algorithm, and mean and standard deviation of not fractured vertebrae).

RESULTS

Independently of the approach that we used, all the measures of central tendency were similar, while significant differences were found when compared with reference ranges in other populations. The vertebral heights of our sample at every vertebral level were significantly smaller than both Rea population and the Lunar reference values, even after normalization. Splitting data according to age groups, there was a decrease in the vertebral heights and ratios between the younger and older women.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that reference data for MXA should be population specific and age matched.

Vertebral morphometry

Visual semiquantitative (SQ) assessment of the radiographs by a trained and experienced observer is the "gold standard" method to detect vertebral fractures. Vertebral morphometry is a quantitative method to identify osteoporotic vertebral fractures based on the measurement of vertebral heights. Vertebral morphometry may be performed on conventional spinal radiographs (MRX: morphometric x-ray radiography) or on images obtained from dual x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scans (MXA: morphometric x-ray absorptiometry). Vertebral fracture assessment (VFA) indicates the method for identification of the vertebral fractures using lateral spine views acquired by DXA, with low-dose exposition. For epidemiologic studies and clinical drug trials in osteoporosis research but also in clinical practice, the preferred method is radiographic SQ assessment., because an expert eye can better distinguish between true fractures and vertebral anomalies than can quantitative morphometry. However, vertebral morphometry, calculating the deformity of overall thoracic and lumbar spine, may supply useful data about the vertebral fracture risk. VFA performed during routine densitometry allows identification, by visual or morphometric methods, of most osteoporotic vertebral fractures, even those that are asymptomatic.

Vertebral Fracture Assessment: the 2007 ISCD Official Positions

Vertebral fracture assessment (VFA) is an established, low radiation method for detection of prevalent vertebral fractures. Vertebral fractures are usually not recognized clinically at the time of their occurrence, but their presence indicates a substantial risk for subsequent fractures independent of bone mineral density. Significant evidence supporting VFA use for many post-menopausal women and older men has accumulated since the last ISCD Official Position Statement on VFA was published. The International Society for Clinical Densitometry considered the following issues at the 2007 Position Development Conference: (1) What are appropriate indications for Vertebral Fracture Assessment; (2) What is the most appropriate method of vertebral fracture detection with VFA; (3) What is the sensitivity and specificity for detection of vertebral fractures with this method; (4) When should additional spine imaging be performed following a VFA; and (5) What are the reporting obligations for those interpreting VFA images?

Vertebral fracture diagnosis in the multinational BONE study of oral ibandronate: quality management in radiology

A multicenter trial has established the antifracture efficacy of oral daily (2.5mg) as well as intermittent (20mg every other day for 12 doses every 3 mo) ibandronate in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis. As diagnostic spinal radiographs for this trial were read at 2 centers, the study protocol included rigorous procedures for diagnosis of morphometric vertebral fractures. These included standardized qualitative and morphometric assessment methods for diagnosing vertebral osteoporotic fractures and consensus cross-validation procedures for maximizing fracture diagnostic accuracy and consistency between the 2 radiographic reading centers. Using these stringent measures, the between-center discrepancy in the diagnosis of prevalent fractures was only 8%. Furthermore, after cross-validation, discrepancy in the final diagnosis of incident fractures between centers was found for only 4 patients, resulting in a net gain of only 2 fractures in the trial. This meticulous methodology provided a highly effective means of identifying vertebral fractures and recruiting the trial population in which to assess the efficacy of ibandronate in postmenopausal osteoporosis.

Risk factors for prevalent vertebral fractures in black and white female densitometry patients

This cross-sectional study compared risk factors for prevalent vertebral fractures (diagnosed using densitometric spine image Vertebral Fracture Assessment [VFA]) in 176 black and 345 white women recruited during their clinical bone mineral density (BMD) testing at the University of Chicago Hospitals. We used logistic regression to assess the association of prevalent vertebral fractures and risk factors (age, height loss, history of nonvertebral fractures, BMD, and use of corticosteroids). The prevalence of vertebral fractures was 21% for both races. All risk factors of interest were significantly associated with vertebral fractures in white women. Among black women, only age and corticosteroid use were found to be significant predictors of presence of vertebral fracture(s). In women without history of corticosteroid use, the probability of having vertebral fracture(s) given age was lower (p=0.02) in black subjects. In 77 patients with a history of corticosteroid use, the probability of having vertebral fracture(s) was higher in black than in white women after adjustment for age (p=0.045), BMD (p=0.045), or cumulative corticosteroid dose (p=0.08). Fewer black women were prescribed pharmacologic therapy for osteoporosis, regardless of their BMD level and corticosteroid use. We conclude that use of corticosteroids may be associated with relatively greater vertebral fracture risk in blacks than in whites.

Radiographic texture analysis of densitometer-generated calcaneus images differentiates postmenopausal women with and without fractures

INTRODUCTION

Bone fragility is determined by bone mass, measured as bone mineral density (BMD), and by trabecular structure, which cannot be easily measured using currently available noninvasive methods. In previous studies, radiographic texture analysis (RTA) performed on the radiographic images of the spine, proximal femur, and os calcis differentiated subjects with and without osteoporotic fractures. The present cross-sectional study was undertaken to determine whether such differentiation could also be made using high-resolution os calcis images obtained on a peripheral densitometer.

METHODS

In 170 postmenopausal women (42 with and 128 without prevalent vertebral fractures) who had no secondary causes of osteoporosis and were not receiving treatment for osteoporosis, BMD of the lumbar spine, proximal femur, and os calcis was measured using dual energy x-ray absorptiometry. Vertebral fractures were diagnosed on densitometric spine images. RTA, including Fourier-based and fractal analyses, was performed on densitometric images of os calcis.

RESULTS

BMD at all three sites and all texture features was significantly different in subjects with and without fractures, with the most significant differences observed for the femoral neck and total hip measurements and for the RTA feature Minkowski fractal (p<0.001). In univariate logistic regression analysis, Minkowski fractal predicted the presence of vertebral fractures as well as femoral neck BMD (p<0.001). In multivariate logistic regression analysis, both femoral neck BMD and Minkowski fractal yielded significant predictive effects (p=0.001), and when age was added to the model, the effect of RTA remained significant (p=0.002), suggesting that RTA reflects an aspect of bone fragility that is not captured by age or BMD. Finally, when RTA was compared in 42 fracture patients and 42 nonfracture patients matched for age and BMD, the RTA features were significantly different between the groups (p=0.003 to p=0.04), although BMD and age were not.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that RTA of densitometer-generated calcaneus images provides an estimate of bone fragility independent of and complementary to BMD measurement and age.

Association between prior non-spine non-hip fractures or prevalent radiographic vertebral deformities known to be at least 10 years old and incident hip fracture

In this large cohort of elderly women, prior non-spine non-hip fractures and radiographic vertebral deformities >10 years old were modestly associated with incident hip fracture, but the excess risks of hip fracture attributable to those prior fractures and deformities seem to wane over time.

INTRODUCTION

Whereas prior clinical fractures and prevalent radiographic vertebral deformities are well-documented predictors of incident hip fracture, the excess risks of incident fractures attributable to those prior fractures and deformities may decrease over time. Current guidelines regarding the assessment of fracture risk do not consider elapsed time since prior fracture or ascertainment of radiographic vertebral deformity.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We ascertained self-reported history of prior clinical fractures and calcaneal and total hip bone BMD and performed lateral spine radiographs in a cohort of 9516 community-dwelling elderly women who had not had a prior hip fracture. We prospectively followed them to assess incident hip fracture. Prevalent radiographic vertebral deformities were identified at baseline using morphometry, and incident hip fractures were confirmed by review of radiographic reports during three follow-up periods (0-5, >5-10, and >10 years after baseline exam).

RESULTS

Among women who survived for 10 or more years after the baseline exam without having had a hip fracture, a history of non-spine non-hip fracture since age 50 reported at the baseline study examination was associated with a 21% age- and calcaneal BMD-adjusted excess risk (hazard ratio [HR], 1.21; 95% CI, 1.01-1.45) for subsequent incident hip fracture. Baseline radiographic vertebral deformity was associated with a 41% age- and BMD-adjusted excess risk (HR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.15-1.73) of hip fracture after 10 years of follow-up. In comparison, the age- and BMD-adjusted HRs of incident hip fracture during the first 5 years of follow-up associated with prior non-spine non-hip fractures reported at the baseline study exam and prevalent radiographic vertebral deformities were 1.70 (95% CI, 1.30-2.22) and 2.10 (95% CI, 1.58-2.78), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Self-reported prior non-spine non-hip fractures and prevalent radiographic vertebral deformities known to be at least 10 years old are modestly associated with incident hip fracture. The association between these predictor fractures and subsequent hip fractures seems to wane with increased time after ascertainment of the predictor fracture. Hip fracture risk assessment strategies incorporating prior fracture history should also consider elapsed time since those prior fractures.

Reliability and accuracy of vertebral fracture assessment with densitometry compared to radiography in clinical practice

Absorptiometry of the thoraco-lumbar spine at the time of bone densitometry to detect vertebral deformities consistent with fracture is now available. The performance of absorptiometry in clinical practice compared to radiography has not been fully established, especially in the presence of osteoarthritis or scoliosis. Our first objective was to compare absorptiometry to radiography for detection of vertebral deformity in elderly women who were referred for bone densitometry with or without scoliosis or disc space osteoarthritis excluded. Our second objective was to assess the effect of osteoarthritis and scoliosis on the inter-rater reliability of both technologies. The study group comprised two hundred five women age 65 and older referred for bone densitometry in a large multispecialty group practice. Lateral and antero-posterior (AP) absorptiometry images and lateral spine radiographs were obtained on all participants. The vertebrae on all images were evaluated for vertebral deformity by two observers according to the Genant semiquantitative criteria who were blinded to each other's readings. Disc spaces were evaluated on radiographs for osteoarthritis. Absorptiometry AP images were evaluated for scoliosis. In the absence of scoliosis, the sensitivity and specificity of absorptiometry for persons with one or more radiographic grade 2-3 deformities (>25% reduction of vertebral height) for the two readers were 87-93% and 93-95%, respectively. The inter-rater reliability of absorptiometry improved in the absence of moderate or severe disc space osteoarthritis. A strategy of absorptiometry with follow-up radiography only in those with scoliosis or apparent grade 2 deformity accurately identifies those with prevalent grade 2 or 3 deformity on radiography (accuracy 0.98 and kappa 0.86 for reader 1; accuracy 0.99 and kappa 0.92 for reader 2). Lateral and AP absorptiometry imaging of the spine with selective follow-up radiography accurately identifies elderly women with vertebral deformity consistent with moderate or severe fracture, but extra caution is necessary when evaluating vertebrae in the presence of adjacent disc space osteoarthritis.

Vertebral fracture assessment: the 2005 ISCD Official Positions

Vertebral Fracture Assessment (VFA) is a low radiation method for imaging the thoraco-lumbar spine using bone densitometers. VFA can easily be performed at the time of bone mineral density (BMD) measurement, allowing integration of BMD and vertebral fracture information into clinical patient care. As VFA is a relatively new procedure, it has received limited study and heretofore has not had widespread clinical application. Consequently, the International Society for Clinical Densitometry (ISCD) considered the following VFA issues at the 2005 Position Development Conference: (1) indications for VFA; (2) methodology for the diagnosis of vertebral fractures using VFA; and (3) indications for additional imaging after VFA. The ISCD Official Positions with respect to the above issues, as well as the rationale and evidence used to derive these positions, are presented here.

Lateral vertebral assessment: a valuable technique to detect clinically significant vertebral fractures

Although many vertebral fractures are clinically silent, they are associated with increased risk for subsequent osteoporotic fractures. A substantial number of these fractures are demonstrable using instant vertebral assessment with Hologic densitometers. Whether similar recognition is possible using dual-energy lateral vertebral assessment (LVA) with GE Lunar densitometers remains uncertain. Thus, we evaluated the ability of clinicians using LVA to detect prevalent vertebral fractures. Dual-energy LVA and conventional thoracic and lumbar spine radiographs were concurrently obtained in 80 postmenopausal women. Using an established visual semiquantitative system, vertebral fractures were identified individually by two non-radiologist clinicians on LVA images, and the results were compared with spinal radiograph evaluation by an expert radiologist. Using LVA, 95% of vertebral bodies from T7 through L4 were evaluable, but a majority (66%) of vertebrae from T4 to T6 were not adequately visualized. In the LVA-evaluable vertebrae, prevalent fractures were identified in 40 vertebral bodies by radiography. In this regard, the clinicians using LVA detected 17 of 18 radiographically evident vertebral fractures of grade 2 or 3, a false negative rate of 6%. They identified 50% (11/22) of grade 1 fractures. Additionally, the vast majority of evaluable non-fractured vertebrae, (764/794, 96.2%) were correctly classified as normal by LVA. Thus, clinicians utilizing LVA correctly identified the vast majority of grade 2 or 3 vertebral compression fractures and normal vertebral bodies, although detection of grade 1 fractures was less effective. In conclusion, the low-radiation, dual-energy LVA technique provides a rapid and convenient way for clinicians to identify patients with, and without, grade 2 or 3 vertebral fractures, thereby enhancing care of osteoporotic patients.

Potential cost-effective use of spine radiographs to detect vertebral deformity and select osteopenic post-menopausal women for amino-bisphosphonate therapy

Prevalent vertebral deformities are predictive of future clinical fractures independent of bone density. We used a Markov model with eight health states to estimate from the societal perspective the cost-effectiveness of using spine radiographs to identify postmenopausal women age 60 or older with one or more vertebral deformities and then treat them with anti-resorptive drug therapy to prevent fractures. We compared three strategies: 5 years of amino-bisphosphonate (alendronate) therapy for all, 5 years of alendronate therapy for only those with prevalent a radiographic vertebral deformity or no initial alendronate treatment. Lifetime direct medical and indirect costs, quality adjusted life years (QALYs) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were tracked. For women with one or more prevalent vertebral deformities, the costs per QALY gained ranged from 5,084 dollars (for an 80 year old with a T-score of -2.4) to 61,192 dollars (for a 60 year old with a T-score of -1.0). For women without prevalent vertebral deformity, the costs per QALY gained ranged from 41,897 dollars (for a 60 year old with a T-score of -2.4) to 166,219 dollars (for an 80 year old with a T-score of -1.0). These results were modestly sensitive to reasonable changes in fracture rates, disutility, discount rates and assumptions about the accuracy of spinal radiographs for detecting vertebral deformity. Assuming a societal willingness to pay per QALY gained of 50,000 dollars, the strategy of performing spine radiographs in post-menopausal osteopenic women with T-scores at or below -1.5 and treating those with 1 or more prevalent vertebral deformities is likely to be cost-effective. However, further research on the accuracy of vertebral deformity ascertainment from routine clinical radiographs and on the efficacy of amino-bisphosphonate drugs for reducing the risk of non-vertebral fractures in osteopenic women is needed to define more precisely the subset of osteopenic post-menopausal women in whom use of spinal radiographs is most cost-effective.

Identification of vertebral fractures: an update

Osteoporotic vertebral fracture is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. As a powerful predictor of future fracture risk, the identification of vertebral fracture helps target individuals who will benefit from anti-fracture therapy. The identification of vertebral fractures is problematic because (1) "normal" radiological appearances in the spine vary greatly both among and within individuals; (2) "normal" vertebrae may exhibit misleading radiological appearances due to radiographic projection error; and (3) "abnormal" appearances due to non-fracture deformities and normal variants are common, but can be difficult to differentiate from true vertebral fracture. Various methods of vertebral fracture definition have been proposed, but there is no agreed gold standard. Quantitative methods of vertebral fracture definition are objective and reproducible, but the major limitation of these methods is their inability to differentiate between vertebral deformity and vertebral fracture. The qualitative visual approach draws on the expertise of the reader, but it is a subjective method with poor interobserver agreement. Semiquantitative assessment of vertebral fracture is a standardized visual method, which is commonly applied in research studies as a surrogate gold standard. This method is more objective and reproducible than a purely qualitative approach, but can be difficult to apply. The established methods focus primarily on the identification of "reduced" or short vertebral height as an indication of vertebral fracture, but this is also a feature of some non-fracture deformities and normal variants. A modified visual approach known as algorithm-based qualitative assessment of vertebral fracture (ABQ) has recently been introduced, and this focuses on radiological evidence of change at the vertebral endplate as the primary indicator of fracture. Preliminary testing of the ABQ method has produced promising results, but the method requires further evaluation. Vertebral imaging by means of dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scanner produces images of near-radiographic quality at a fraction of the radiation dose incurred by conventional radiography. There is growing interest in vertebral fracture assessment using this technique as a means of assessing a patient's fracture risk. Given the increasing availability of new technology and the importance of accurate diagnosis of vertebral fracture, there is an urgent need for better awareness of and training in the definition of vertebral fracture. Methods of vertebral fracture definition should be validated by testing the association with clinical outcomes of vertebral fracture, in particular the prediction of incident fractures.

Tubal ligation and the risk of vertebral fractures

Osteoporosis is a major public problem. More than 35 million Americans are at risk of developing osteoporosis. Nearly half of all women will have an osteoporotic fracture in their lifetime. Tubal ligation (tubal sterilization) is used more than any other single method of contraception in the USA and worldwide. In 1995, 34.6% (approximately 7 million) of ever-married US women between ages 35-44 years had undergone tubal ligation. Tubal sterilization may disturb ovarian function and be associated with more menstrual and menopausal symptoms and, thus, may be a risk factor for osteoporosis. The objective of this paper is to examine the possible association between tubal sterilization and osteoporotic fractures. Data are from a questionnaire mailed to a previously identified cohort of college/university alumnae who had graduated between 1926 and 1981. This study was performed during 1996 and 1997, 15 years after the initial study. The subjects were 3,940 women participants in the follow-up study. Their mean age was 53.7 years at time of reporting, ranging from 37 to over 80 years. Excluding deaths and non-deliverables the response rate was 85%. Of the 3,940 subjects, 491 (12.5%), and, of the ever-pregnant women, 15.5%, had undergone tubal sterilization (TS); 899 (22.8%) reported at least one fracture after age 20, and 70 (1.8%) at least one vertebral fracture after age 20, which had been confirmed by X-ray. TS was strongly associated with self-reports of vertebral fractures that had been confirmed by X-ray. The multivariable adjusted odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals for women 50 years and over and for women 55 years and over were, respectively, 2.7 (1.4, 5.0) and 3.3 (1.5, 7.0). Having had any fracture was not significantly associated with TS: odds ratio (OR) = 1.1 for women 50 years and older and OR = 1.3 for those 55 years and older. This epidemiological study in a cohort of highly educated, mostly Caucasian women shows an association between past tubal sterilization and self-reported X-ray-confirmed vertebral fractures. These results need to be confirmed in other cohorts--the pathophysiology of this association is worthy of further study.

Classification of spinal injuries based on the essential traumatic spinal mechanisms

STUDY DESIGN

A biomechanical unitary classification of spinal injuries is proposed.

OBJECTIVE

To present an evaluation of spinal injuries based on the essential traumatic spinal mechanisms: axial deformation, torsion, translation and combined mechanisms in connection with the concept of the stabilizing axial spinal pillar.

SETTING

Hospital 'Sf. Treime', Iasi, Romania.

METHODS

The essential mechanisms of spinal injuries are considered: (1) axial deformation with (a) compression (centric or eccentric), most often eccentric, including compression in flexion or extension; (b) spinal elongation with distraction as centric elongation, but frequently axial eccentric elongation and a flexion or extension injury; (2) torsion or axial spinal rotation, (3) segmental translation, with a shearing version for the double translation and (4) combined mechanisms - the most frequent situation. Over 300 patients with spinal injuries were analysed and the spinal instability was determined using the criteria of clinical instability. The cases of spinal instability were studied in connection with the types of lesion of the central axial spinal pillar.

RESULTS

All cases with lesions of the central axial spinal pillar had traumatic spinal instability. The spinal instability was absent in cases of isolated lesions of the anterior or posterior secondary pillar. The X-ray and spinal CT analysis of the traumatic spinal lesions showed the types of lesions and specified the mechanisms of spinal injuries. The combined mechanisms were responsible for the majority of the spinal injuries.

CONCLUSIONS

Spinal instability occurs because of the lesion of the central axial spinal pillar The types of lesions of the central spinal pillar and of the secondary spinal pillars are determined by the essential traumatic spinal mechanisms: axial deformation (with compression or elongation), axial rotation, translation and most frequently the above combined mechanisms.

Similar prevalence of vertebral fractures despite different approaches to define reference data

Morphometric detection of vertebral fractures requires the use of reference normal values. In previous studies, normal values were obtained in young healthy adults or in adults of various ages in whom abnormal radiographs were excluded using trimming algorithms. We established four sets of normal values defined according to different approaches. We used a group of 102 young healthy women with normal spine radiographs and a population-based cohort of 260 women 51 to 85 years old (EVOS study) to select those with normal spine radiographs based on the semiquantitative method of Genant, the trimming algorithm defined by Melton, and the trimming algorithm defined by Black. Using the four sets of reference data, we applied two diagnostic criteria, the mean - 3SD and the 0.85 x mean to detect prevalent vertebral fractures in two groups of women: the population-based cohort of 260 women recruited for the EVOS study and 176 osteoporotic women 54 to 88 years old with at least one vertebral fracture. In the population-based cohort, the number of vertebral fractures varied from 53 to 57 for the 0.85 x mean cutoff and from 93 to 115 for the mean - 3SD cutoff. In the osteoporotic women, the number of vertebral fractures varied from 255 to 273 for the 0.85 x mean cutoff and from 372 to 404 for the mean - 3SD cutoff. In both groups, the number of vertebral fractures detected with the 0.85 x mean cutoff was close to the number detected by the semiquantitative method of Genant, which does not require a reference population. For the 0.85 x mean cutoff, agreement of diagnosis using different reference values was excellent (kappa = 0.96-0.99). For the mean - 3SD cutoff, agreement of vertebral fracture detection based on the four reference sets was good (kappa = 0.79-0.93). Agreement of diagnosis was lower when two cutoffs were compared using the same set of reference values (kappa = 0.60-0.81). In conclusion, reference data derived using different approaches give similar rates of prevalence of vertebral fractures. Compared to the semiquantitative assessment, the prevalence of vertebral fractures is similar for the 0.85 x mean cutoff, whereas it is considerably higher for the mean - 3SD cutoff.

Osteoporosis due to cancer treatment: pathogenesis and management

Many therapeutic regimens in cancer treatment carry the risk of causing or favoring the development of osteoporosis. Therapies in which hypogonadism may occur are most relevant in this respect. Prompt hormone replacement therapy is indicated in these patients. In patients in whom this is undesirable because of a hormone-dependent tumor, the risk of osteoporosis should be assessed by means of osteodensitometry, and prophylactic or therapeutic measures should be instituted if necessary. Early intervention improves outcome because osteoporosis therapy is most effective in preventing deterioration of bone mass. There remains much uncertainty in assessing the risk of combination chemotherapy with regard to the development of osteoporosis. Negative effects on the skeleton have, however, been demonstrated for individual drugs, such as methotrexate and ifosfamide. Negative effects of the tumor itself on bone metabolism may aggravate the degree of osteoporosis. Detailed data and long-term experience to assess the risk are urgently needed in this area and constitute an important research topic for the coming years and decades. This review discusses the most prevalent mechanisms of osteoporosis caused by cancer treatment and outlines therapeutic strategies for the prevention and treatment of therapy-induced bone loss.

Morphometric dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry of the spine: report of a large series and correlation with axial bone mineral density

We studied vertebral morphometry and its relation to bone mineral density (BMD) in normal Brazilian women (n = 605). All women (age 22-97 years) were ambulatory and healthy. A lateral spine scan was done for morphometric X-ray absorptiometry using an imaging densitometer. In 429 of these women, BMD of the spine and proximal femur also were measured using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. All women were white with mean (+/- 1 SD) age of 53.7 (+/- 9.5) years. About 21% of the women over 50 years had a T score for spine BMD lower than -2.5 SD, and 7% had a femoral neck BMD below this osteoporosis threshold. Vertebral heights (anterior, HA; middle, HM; and posterior, HP) and ratios (HA/HP and HM/HP) were assessed. There was no systematic difference between younger (20-49 years) and older (50+ years) women in heights or ratios. The vertebral heights were normalized for those observed in each individual case for the L2-L4 sequence. This normalization was adequate for all vertebral heights; the Z score averaged about +0.1. The average Z score for HA/HP was +0.01, but that for the HM/HP was -0.72, indicating that the latter ratio might differ from the reference population used (white American and European women). We observed a small positive correlation between vertebral heights and spine or femur BMD, but this was due entirely to the influence of body size on BMD. On a group basis, the HM/HP showed a significant association with axial BMD; the 1 SD difference between the lowest and highest quartile was associated with a difference of 8-15% (0.5-1.0 SD) in axial BMD.

[Epidemiology of osteoporosis]

Epidemiological studies have identified osteoporosis as a disease of significant public health impact and have delineated numerous potential risk factors. Nevertheless, it has proven difficult to establish preventive strategies for several reasons. First, there has been no final agreement on the definition of osteoporosis, which has hampered efforts to characterize the magnitude of the problem as a whole. Secondly, as osteoporosis is a multifactorial chronic disorder, effective programs for risk assessment and intervention depend on the development of complex disease models. In summarizing the contributions of epidemiological studies to the current understanding of osteoporosis this review intends to outline the scientific background for the European Vertebral Osteoporosis Study (EVOS) and its successors.

[Vertebral deformity as an index of osteoporosis-induced spinal fracture--an external validity construct based on bone density data]

BACKGROUND

In order to test the validity of vertebral morphometry for the assessment of prevalent vertebral osteoporotic fractures, we examined the association between vertebral deformities and bone mineral density (BMD).

METHOD

The study population consisted of 595 postmenopausal women and 581 men aged 50 to 82 years who participated in the baseline survey of the European Vertebral Osteoporosis Study (EVOS) in Germany and received BMD measurements by dual-X-ray-absorptiometry (DXA) at the femur and the lumbar spine.

RESULTS

In both sexes only vertebral deformities defined by more stringent morphometric criteria (McCloskey; Eastell 4 SD criterion) were significantly and inversely related to BMD (odds ratios 1.42 to 3.21 for a 1 SD [standard deviation] reduction in BMD; p < 0.05). The strength of the association depended on the stringency of the morphometric algorithm applied, and on the site of BMD measurement. The strongest associations were observed with femoral neck BMD in women and with BMD at the lumbar spine in men. In contingency analyses between vertebral deformities and osteoporosis (WHO criteria; European young female BMD reference values), vertebral deformities proved to be highly specific by all methods, even slightly more so in men (87.8 to 97.5%) than in women (86.3 to 96.7%). The predictive value of a positive test with respect to vertebral osteoporosis reached a maximum value of about 50% in both sexes. It further increased up to 72%, when the definition of osteoporosis was based on low BMD values at either the spine or the femoral neck, but only in women.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, for both men and women the likelihood of vertebral deformities to be related to osteoporosis increases with the stringency of the morphometric method, with a similar probability of major deformities to represent vertebral osteoporotic fractures in men as in women. Nevertheless, even the most stringent morphometric criteria are not sufficiently valid instruments for the assessment of the prevalence of vertebral osteoporotic fractures in epidemiological studies.