Terminal Differentiation of Dendritic Cells

Fat Deposition and Fat Effects on Meat Quality—A Review

Simple Summary

Animal fat deposition has a major impact on the meat yield from individual carcasses as well the perceived eating quality for consumers. Understanding the impact of livestock production practices on fat deposition and the molecular mechanisms activated will lead to a better understanding of finishing livestock. This enhanced understanding will also lead to the increased efficiency and improved sustainability of practices for livestock production. The impact of fat storage on physiological functions and health are also important. This review brings together both the production practices and the current understanding of molecular processes associated with fat deposition.

Abstract

Growth is frequently described as weight gain over time. Researchers have used this information in equations to predict carcass composition and estimate fat deposition. Diet, species, breed, and gender all influence fat deposition. Alterations in diets result in changes in fat deposition as well as the fatty acid profile of meat. Additionally, the amount and composition of the fat can affect lipid stability and flavor development upon cooking. Fat functions not only as a storage of energy and contributor of flavor compounds, but also participates in signaling that affects many aspects of the physiological functions of the animal. Transcription factors that are upregulated in response to excess energy to be stored are an important avenue of research to improve the understanding of fat deposition and thus, the efficiency of production. Additionally, further study of the inflammation associated with increased fat depots may lead to a better understanding of finishing animals, production efficiency, and overall health.

Absence of Batf3 reveals a new dimension of cell state heterogeneity within conventional dendritic cells

Conventional dendritic cells (cDCs) are traditionally subdivided into cDC1 and cDC2 lineages. Batf3 is a cDC1-required transcription factor, and we observed that Batf3−/− mice harbor a population of cDC1-like cells co-expressing cDC2-associated surface molecules. Using single-cell RNA sequencing with integrated cell surface protein expression (CITE-seq), we found that Batf3−/− mitotic immature cDC1-like cells showed reduced expression of cDC1 features and increased levels of cDC2 features. In wild type, we also observed a proportion of mature cDC1 cells expressing surface features characteristic to cDC2 and found that overall cDC cell state heterogeneity was mainly driven by developmental stage, proliferation, and maturity. We detected population diversity within Sirpa+ cDC2 cells, including a Cd33+ cell state expressing high levels of Sox4 and lineage-mixed features characteristic to cDC1, cDC2, pDCs, and monocytes. In conclusion, these data suggest that multiple cDC cell states can co-express lineage-overlapping features, revealing a level of previously unappreciated cDC plasticity.

•

Single-cell proteogenomics identifies additional layers of DC heterogeneity

•

cDC diversity is driven by proliferation, developmental stage, and maturation

•

Lack of Batf3 increases cDCs with lineage-mixed features

•

Sox4+ cDCs represent a cell state of lineage-mixed features

Dendritic cells and Brucella spp. interaction: the sentinel host and the stealthy pathogen

As dendritic cells (DCs) are among the first cells to encounter antigens, these cells trigger both innate and T cell responses, and are the most potent antigen-presenting cells. Brucella spp., which is an intracellular facultative and stealthy pathogen, is able to evade the bactericidal activities of professional phagocytes. Several studies have demonstrated that Brucella can survive and replicate intracellularly, thereby provoking impaired maturation of DCs. Therefore, the interaction between DCs and Brucella becomes an interesting model to study the immune response. In this review, we first will describe the most common techniques for DCs differentiation in vitro as well as general features of brucellosis. Then, the interaction of DCs and Brucella, including pathogen recognition, molecular mechanisms of bacterial pathogenesis, and intracellular trafficking of Brucella to subvert innate response, will be reviewed. Finally, we will debate diversity in immunological DC response and the controversial role of DC activation against Brucella infection.

Metabolic Regulation of Dendritic Cell Differentiation

Dendritic cells (DCs) are important antigen-presenting cells (APCs) that play essential roles in bridging innate and adaptive immune responses. Differentiation stages of DC subsets from bone marrow progenitor cells have been well-defined during the past decades. Features that distinguish DC progenitor cells from each differentiation stages, related signaling pathways and transcription factors that are crucial for DC lineage commitment have been well-elucidated in numerous studies. Recently, growing evidence are showing that cellular metabolism, as one of the most fundamental process of cells, has essential role in the modulation of immune system. There have been multiple reports and reviews that focus on the metabolic modulations on DC functions, however little attention had been paid to the metabolic regulation of DC development and differentiation. In recent years, increasing evidence suggests that metabolic regulations also exert significant impact on DC differentiation, as well as on the homeostasis of tissue resident DCs. The focus of this review is to summarize the findings from recent studies on the metabolic regulation of DC differentiation and to discuss the impacts of the three major aspects of metabolism on the processes of DC development and differentiation, namely the changes in metabolic pathways, the molecular signaling pathways that modulate cell metabolism, and the effects of metabolites and nutrients. The aim of this review is to draw attentions to this important and exciting research field where the effects of metabolic process and their regulation in DC differentiation need to be further explored.

Monomethyl fumarate treatment impairs maturation of human myeloid dendritic cells and their ability to activate T cells

BACKGROUND

Dimethyl fumarate (DMF) and its active metabolite monomethyl fumarate (MMF) effectively lead to reduction in disease relapses and active magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) lesions. DMF and MMF are known to be effective in modulating T- and B-cell responses; however, their effect on the phenotype and function of human myeloid dendritic cells (mDCs) is not fully understood.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the role of MMF on human mDCs maturation and function.

METHODS

mDCs from healthy controls were isolated and cultured in vitro with MMF. The effect of MMF on mDC gene expression was determined by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) array after in vitro MMF treatment. The ability of mDCs to activate T cells was assessed by in vitro co-culture system. mDCs from DMF-treated multiple sclerosis (MS) patients were analyzed by flow cytometry and PCR.

RESULTS

MMF treatment induced a less mature phenotype of mDCs with reduced expression of major histocompatibility complex class II (MHC-II), co-stimulatory molecules CD86, CD40, CD83, and expression of nuclear factor κB (NF-κB) subunits RELA and RELB. mDCs from DMF-treated MS patients also showed the same immature phenotype. T cells co-cultured with MMF-treated mDCs showed reduced proliferation with decreased production of interferon gamma (IFN-γ), interleukin-17 (IL-17), and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) compared to untreated cells.

CONCLUSION

We report that MMF can modulate immune response by affecting human mDC function.

Development of conventional dendritic cells: from common bone marrow progenitors to multiple subsets in peripheral tissues

Our understanding of conventional dendritic cell (cDC) development and the functional specializations of distinct subsets in the peripheral tissues has increased greatly in recent years. Here, we review cDC development from the distinct progenitors in the bone marrow through to the distinct cDC subsets found in barrier tissues, providing an overview of the different subsets described in each location. In addition, we detail the transcription factors and local signals that have been proposed to control this developmental process. Importantly, despite these significant advances, numerous questions remain to be answered regarding cDC development. For example, it remains unclear whether the different subsets described, such as the CD103+CD11b+ and CD103-CD11b+ cDCs in the intestines, truly represent different populations or rather distinct developmental or activation stages. Furthermore, whether distinct progenitors exist for these cDC subsets remains to be determined. Thus in the last part of this review we discuss what we believe will be the main questions facing the field for the coming years.

Batf3 selectively determines acquisition of CD8+ dendritic cell phenotype and function

Batf3 is a transcription factor that impacts the development of CD103⁺ tissue-resident dendritic cells (DCs). However, whether Batf3 is absolutely required for the development of CD8⁺ DCs remains controversial. Id2 is required for CD8⁺ DC development. Here we show that bone marrow chimeric mice with a deletion of Id2 in the CD11c compartment lose the ability to reject a skin graft expressing a non-self protein antigen or mount a delayed hypersensitivity response. In contrast, Batf3^-/- mice remained competent for skin graft rejection and delayed hypersensitivity, and retained a CD8⁺ DC population with markers characteristic of the CD11b⁺ DC lineage, including CD11b, CD4 and CD172α, as well as the key regulator transcription factor IRF4, but lacked IRF8 expression. CD8⁺ DCs in Batf3^-/- mice took up and cleaved protein antigen and larger particles but were unable to phagocytose dying cells, a characteristic feature to the CD8⁺ DC lineage. These data clarify a requirement for CD8⁺ lineage DCs to induce effectors of neo-antigen-driven skin graft rejection, and improve our understanding of DC subtype commitment by demonstrating that in the absence of Batf3 CD8⁺ DCs can change their fate and become CD11b⁺ DCs.

Combination of cytokine-induced killer and dendritic cells pulsed with antigenic α-1,3-galactosyl epitope-enhanced lymphoma cell membrane for effective B-cell lymphoma immunotherapy

BACKGROUND AIMS

Refractory B-cell lymphomas are difficult to successfully treat with current chemotherapeutic regimens; however, immunotherapy may be an effective form of treatment for these patients.

METHODS

Fourteen refractory lymphoma patients (age, 29-74 y) were enrolled in the trial. α-1,3-galactosyl (α-Gal) epitopes were synthesized on lymphoma cell membranes with the use of bovine recombinant α-1,3-galactosyltransferase (α-GT) and neuraminidase to enhance tumor immunogenicity. Subsequent incubation of processed cell membranes with autologous dendritic cells (DCs) in the presence of human serum containing abundant natural anti-α-Gal immunoglobulin G led to the effective phagocytosis of tumor membranes by DCs. The pulsed DCs and autologous cytokine-induced killer cells were then co-cultured to promote maximum cytotoxicity to lymphoma cells and were infused back into the donor lymphoma patients. Therapeutic responses were assessed by clinical observation, laboratory tests and a computed tomography scan at 6 months after treatment.

RESULTS

Complete and partial remission occurred in four and three patients, respectively. The disease status remained unchanged in five patients, and disease progression was observed in two patients. No serious side effects or autoimmune diseases were observed in any participants. Serum lactate dehydrogenase and β2-macroglobulin decreased in 11 and 14 patients, respectively. All patients showed robust systemic cytotoxicity in response to tumor lysate as measured by interferon-γ expression in peripheral blood mononuclear cells after treatment (P < 0.001). The number of peripheral immune effector cells (CD3(+)/CD4(+), CD8(+)/CD28(+) and CD16(+)/CD56(+) cells) increased significantly (P < 0.05) 3 months after treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Lymphoma cell-specific α-Gal immunotherapy is safe, effective and has great potential for the treatment of refractory B-cell lymphoma.

The Ability of Precursory Monocytes (MO) to Differentiate Varies Among Individuals But Is Stable Over Time

Background

The ability to generate dendritic cells (DCs) from precursory monocytes (MOs) was a breakthrough in the field of immunology. However, it is unknown whether the ability of MOs to differentiate into immature DCs (iDCs) differs across subjects or is time dependent. Given that the study of immune system function is gaining recognition in the field of clinical medicine, it is important to know how certain immunologic features vary over time.

Material/Methods

This study investigates how much individuals’ MO-to-iDC differentiation potential changes over time. We estimated this potential by measuring the expression of an iDC marker (CD1a), cytokine secretion (interleukin [IL]-12p70), and the ability of IL-4 and granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) differentiation MOs to stimulate T cells. We collected MOs obtained from different subjects (n=17) at least 1 month apart. Furthermore, we investigated several variables (expression for cytokine receptors, timing, and emergence of DC-related transcriptional factor PU.1).

Results

The ability of MOs to become DCs under the influence of IL-4 and GM-CSF varied greatly between individuals (range of CD1a expression, 20–80%) but was stable over time (change of CD1a expression between sampling, ~5%). A similar pattern emerged when production of IL-12p70 was analyzed. The ability to stimulate T cells was variable and depended on the T-cell source. The ability of MOs to become iDCs was not linked to the surface expression of receptors for IL-4 and GM-CSF but rather to the activation of PU.1 in the precursory MO. It took 5 days for all committed MOs to become iDCs under in vitro influence of IL-4 and GM-CSF.

Conclusions

We concluded that the potential of MO to become iDC is an individual feature and depends on activation of PU.1.

IgE-mediated enhancement of CD4(+) T cell responses requires antigen presentation by CD8α(-) conventional dendritic cells

IgE, forming an immune complex with small proteins, can enhance the specific antibody and CD4(+) T cell responses in vivo. The effects require the presence of CD23 (Fcε-receptor II)(+) B cells, which capture IgE-complexed antigens (Ag) in the circulation and transport them to splenic B cell follicles. In addition, also CD11c(+) cells, which do not express CD23, are required for IgE-mediated enhancement of T cell responses. This suggests that some type of dendritic cell obtains IgE-Ag complexes from B cells and presents antigenic peptides to T cells. To elucidate the nature of this dendritic cell, mice were immunized with ovalbumin (OVA)-specific IgE and OVA, and different populations of CD11c(+) cells, obtained from the spleens four hours after immunization, were tested for their ability to present OVA. CD8α(-) conventional dendritic cells (cDCs) were much more efficient in inducing specific CD4(+) T cell proliferation ex vivo than were CD8α(+) cDCs or plasmacytoid dendritic cells. Thus, IgE-Ag complexes administered intravenously are rapidly transported to the spleen by recirculating B cells where they are delivered to CD8α(-) cDCs which induce proliferation of CD4(+) T cells.

XCR1+ dendritic cells promote memory CD8+ T cell recall upon secondary infections with Listeria monocytogenes or certain viruses

Alexandre et al. demonstrate the XCR1⁺ DCs are instrumental in memory CD8⁺ T cell responses to Listeria, VSV or vaccinia virus infection, but not CMV. Depending on the infection, robust memory CTL responses require cytokine- and chemokine-dependent cross-talk between XCR1⁺ DCs and NK cells or other IFN-γ–producing lymphocytes.

Naive CD8⁺ T cell priming during tumor development or many primary infections requires cross-presentation by XCR1⁺ dendritic cells (DCs). Memory CD8⁺ T lymphocytes (mCTLs) harbor a lower activation threshold as compared with naive cells. However, whether their recall responses depend on XCR1⁺ DCs is unknown. By using a new mouse model allowing fluorescent tracking and conditional depletion of XCR1⁺ DCs, we demonstrate a differential requirement of these cells for mCTL recall during secondary infections by different pathogens. XCR1⁺ DCs were instrumental to promote this function upon secondary challenges with Listeria monocytogenes, vesicular stomatitis virus, or Vaccinia virus, but dispensable in the case of mouse cytomegalovirus. We deciphered how XCR1⁺ DCs promote mCTL recall upon secondary infections with Listeria. By visualizing for the first time the in vivo choreography of XCR1⁺ DCs, NK cells and mCTLs during secondary immune responses, and by neutralizing in vivo candidate molecules, we demonstrate that, very early after infection, mCTLs are activated, and attracted in a CXCR3-dependent manner, by NK cell–boosted, IL-12–, and CXCL9-producing XCR1⁺ DCs. Hence, depending on the infectious agent, strong recall of mCTLs during secondary challenges can require cytokine- and chemokine-dependent cross-talk with XCR1⁺ DCs and NK cells.

CD8αα⁺ innate-type lymphocytes in the intestinal epithelium mediate mucosal immunity

Innate immune responses are critical for mucosal immunity. Here we describe an innate lymphocyte population, iCD8α cells, characterized by expression of CD8α homodimers. iCD8α cells exhibit innate functional characteristics such as the capacity to engulf and kill bacteria. Development of iCD8α cells depends on expression of interleukin-2 receptor γ chain (IL-2Rγc), IL-15, and the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class Ib protein H2-T3, also known as the thymus leukemia antigen or TL. While lineage tracking experiments indicated that iCD8α cells have a lymphoid origin, their development was independent of the transcriptional suppressor Id2, suggesting that these cells do not belong to the family of innate lymphoid cells. Finally, we identified cells with a similar phenotype in humans, which were profoundly depleted in newborns with necrotizing enterocolitis. These findings suggest a critical role of iCD8α cells in immune responses associated with the intestinal epithelium.

Plasmacytoid dendritic cells: development, functions, and role in atherosclerotic inflammation

Plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDCs) are a specialized subset of DCs that links innate and adaptive immunity. They sense viral and bacterial pathogens and release high levels of Type I interferons (IFN-I) in response to infection. pDCs were shown to contribute to inflammatory responses in the steady state and in pathology. In atherosclerosis, pDCs are involved in priming vascular inflammation and atherogenesis through production of IFN-I and chemokines that attract inflammatory cells to inflamed sites. pDCs also contribute to the proinflammatory activation of effector T cells, cytotoxic T cells, and conventional DCs. However, tolerogenic populations of pDCs are found that suppress atherosclerosis-associated inflammation through down-regulation of function and proliferation of proinflammatory T cell subsets and induction of regulatory T cells with potent immunomodulatory properties. Notably, atheroprotective tolerogenic DCs could be induced by certain self-antigens or bacterial antigens that suggests for great therapeutic potential of these DCs for development of DC-based anti-atherogenic vaccines.