Preclinical Pharmacological Approaches in Drug Discovery for Chronic Pain

A Comprehensive Collection of Pain and Opioid Use Disorder Compounds for High-Throughput Screening and Artificial Intelligence-Driven Drug Discovery

As part of the NIH Helping to End Addiction Long-term (HEAL) Initiative, the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences is dedicated to the development of new pharmacological tools and investigational drugs for managing and treating pain as well as the prevention and treatment of opioid misuse and addiction. In line with these objectives, we created a comprehensive, annotated small molecule library including drugs, probes, and tool compounds that act on published pain- and addiction-relevant targets. Nearly 3000 small molecules associated with approximately 200 known and hypothesized HEAL targets have been assembled, curated, and annotated in one collection. Physical samples of the library compounds have been acquired and plated in 1536-well format, enabling a rapid and efficient high-throughput screen against a wide range of assays. The creation of the HEAL Targets and Compounds Library, coupled with an integrated computational platform for AI-driven machine learning, structural modeling, and virtual screening, provides a valuable source for strategic drug repurposing, innovative profiling, and hypothesis testing of novel targets related to pain and opioid use disorder (OUD). The library is available to investigators for screening pain and OUD-relevant phenotypes.

Burrowing as an index of inflammatory pain in male vs. female rats

The study objective was to determine whether burrowing behavior is useful as a functional index of pain in both male and female rats, and whether a 'no-training' protocol can be used to increase testing efficiency. Adult Sprague-Dawley rats were injected in one or both hindpaws with oil vehicle or complete Freund's adjuvant (CFA); starting the next day, the amount of gravel each rat burrowed out of a tube in 1 h was measured daily for ≤7 days. Without preliminary training on the burrowing procedure, CFA reliably suppressed burrowing for 2-3 days compared to controls, in both sexes. However, whereas unilateral CFA completely suppressed burrowing 1-day post-CFA in nearly all males, bilateral CFA was required to do so in females. When administered 30 min before testing, once daily for 5 days post-CFA, the nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug ketoprofen (0.01-3.2 mg/kg) and the opioid morphine (0.1-3.2 mg/kg) significantly increased CFA-suppressed burrowing, whereas the purported cannabinoid analgesic Δ 9 -tetrahydrocannabinol (0.01-2.0 mg/kg) did not. The benzodiazepine chlordiazepoxide (1.25-10 mg/kg), included as a 'true negative' control, also did not restore CFA-suppressed burrowing in either sex. However, in CFA-treated males only, chlordiazepoxide decreased burrowing, suggesting that anxiety may contribute to burrowing in males but not females that are in pain. Overall these results suggest that burrowing is a valid, functional index of inflammatory pain in both sexes, and training on the burrowing procedure is not necessary. However, females are more avid burrowers than males, which should be considered when both sexes are used in inflammatory pain testing.

OA foundations - experimental models of osteoarthritis

Osteoarthritis (OA) is increasingly recognised as a disease of diverse phenotypes with variable clinical presentation, progression, and response to therapeutic intervention. This same diversity is readily apparent in the many animal models of OA. However, model selection, study design, and interpretation of resultant findings, are not routinely done in the context of the target human (or veterinary) patient OA sub-population or phenotype. This review discusses the selection and use of animal models of OA in discovery and therapeutic-development research. Beyond evaluation of the different animal models on offer, this review suggests focussing the approach to OA-animal model selection on study objective(s), alignment of available models with OA-patient sub-types, and the resources available to achieve valid and translatable results. How this approach impacts model selection is discussed and an experimental design checklist for selecting the optimal model(s) is proposed. This approach should act as a guide to new researchers and a reminder to those already in the field, as to issues that need to be considered before embarking on in vivo pre-clinical research. The ultimate purpose of using an OA animal model is to provide the best possible evidence if, how, when and where a molecule, pathway, cell or process is important in clinical disease. By definition this requires both model and study outcomes to align with and be predictive of outcomes in patients. Keeping this at the forefront of research using pre-clinical OA models, will go a long way to improving the quality of evidence and its translational value.

Effectiveness and selectivity of a heroin conjugate vaccine to attenuate heroin, 6-acetylmorphine, and morphine antinociception in rats: Comparison with naltrexone

BACKGROUND

One emerging strategy to address the opioid crisis includes opioid-targeted immunopharmacotherapies. This study compared effectiveness of a heroin-tetanus toxoid (TT) conjugate vaccine to antagonize heroin, 6-acetylmorphine (6-AM), morphine, and fentanyl antinociception in rats.

METHODS

Adult male and female Sprague Dawley rats received three doses of active or control vaccine at weeks 0, 2, and 4. Vaccine pharmacological selectivity was assessed by comparing opioid dose-effect curves in 50 °C  warm-water tail-withdrawal procedure before and after active or control heroin-TT vaccine. Route of heroin administration [subcutaneous (SC) vs. intravenous [IV)] was also examined as a determinant of vaccine effectiveness. Continuous naltrexone treatment (0.0032-0.032 mg/kg/h) effects on heroin, 6-AM, and morphine antinociceptive potency were also determined as a benchmark for minimal vaccine effectiveness.

RESULTS

The heroin-TT vaccine decreased potency of SC heroin (5-fold), IV heroin (3-fold), and IV 6-AM (3-fold) for several weeks without affecting IV morphine or SC and IV fentanyl potency. The control vaccine did not alter potency of any opioid. Naltrexone dose-dependently decreased antinociceptive potency of SC heroin, and treatment with 0.01 mg/kg/h naltrexone produced similar, approximate 8-fold decreases in potencies of SC and IV heroin, IV 6-AM, and IV morphine. The combination of naltrexone and active vaccine was more effective than naltrexone alone to antagonize SC heroin but not IV heroin.

CONCLUSIONS

The heroin-TT vaccine formulation examined is less effective, but more selective, than chronic naltrexone to attenuate heroin antinociception in rats. Furthermore, these results provide an empirical framework for future preclinical opioid vaccine research to benchmark effectiveness against naltrexone.

Core Outcome Measures in Preclinical Assessment of Candidate Analgesics

All preclinical procedures for analgesic drug discovery involve two components: 1) a "pain stimulus" (the principal independent variable), which is delivered to an experimental subject with the intention of producing a pain state; and 2) a "pain behavior" (the principal dependent variable), which is measured as evidence of that pain state. Candidate analgesics are then evaluated for their effectiveness to reduce the pain behavior, and results are used to prioritize drugs for advancement to clinical testing. This review describes a taxonomy of preclinical procedures organized into an "antinociception matrix" by reference to their types of pain stimulus (noxious, inflammatory, neuropathic, disease related) and pain behavior (unconditioned, classically conditioned, operant conditioned). Particular emphasis is devoted to pain behaviors and the behavioral principals that govern their expression, pharmacological modulation, and preclinical-to-clinical translation. Strengths and weaknesses are compared and contrasted for procedures using each type of behavioral outcome measure, and the following four recommendations are offered to promote strategic use of these procedures for preclinical-to-clinical analgesic drug testing. First, attend to the degree of homology between preclinical and clinical outcome measures, and use preclinical procedures with behavioral outcome measures homologous to clinically relevant outcomes in humans. Second, use combinations of preclinical procedures with complementary strengths and weaknesses to optimize both sensitivity and selectivity of preclinical testing. Third, take advantage of failed clinical translation to identify drugs that can be back-translated preclinically as active negative controls. Finally, increase precision of procedure labels by indicating both the pain stimulus and the pain behavior in naming preclinical procedures.

Addressing the Opioid Crisis: The Importance of Choosing Translational Endpoints in Analgesic Drug Discovery

The opioid crisis has stimulated renewed interest in analgesic drug development. This effort will involve preclinical-to-clinical translational research and will benefit from a focus on endpoints that are both clinically relevant and shared across laboratory animals and humans. Measures of pain-related functional impairment and behavioral depression could serve this purpose.