Computational prediction of functions of intrinsically disordered regions

iDLB-Pred: identification of disordered lipid binding residues in protein sequences using convolutional neural network

Proteins, nucleic acids, and lipids all interact with intrinsically disordered protein areas. Lipid-binding regions are involved in a variety of biological processes as well as a number of human illnesses. The expanding body of experimental evidence for these interactions and the dearth of techniques to anticipate them from the protein sequence serve as driving forces. Although large-scale laboratory techniques are considered to be essential for equipment for studying binding residues, they are time consuming and costly, making it challenging for researchers to predict lipid binding residues. As a result, computational techniques are being looked at as a different strategy to overcome this difficulty. To predict disordered lipid-binding residues (DLBRs), we proposed iDLB-Pred predictor utilizing benchmark dataset to compute feature through extraction techniques to identify relevant patterns and information. Various classification techniques, including deep learning methods such as Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs), Deep Neural Networks (DNNs), Multilayer Perceptrons (MLPs), Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs), Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks, and Gated Recurrent Units (GRUs), were employed for model training. The proposed model, iDLB-Pred, was rigorously validated using metrics such as accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and Matthew's correlation coefficient. The results demonstrate the predictor's exceptional performance, achieving accuracy rates of 81% on an independent dataset and 86% in 10-fold cross-validation.

Molecular Docking of Intrinsically Disordered Proteins: Challenges and Strategies

Intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) are a novel class of proteins that have established a significant importance and attention within a very short period of time. These proteins are essentially characterized by their inherent structural disorder, encoded mainly by their amino acid sequences. The profound abundance of IDPs and intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs) in the biological world delineates their deep-rooted functionality. IDPs and IDRs convey such extensive functionality through their unique dynamic nature, which enables them to carry out huge number of multifaceted biomolecular interactions and make them "interaction hub" of the cellular systems. Additionally, with such widespread functions, their misfunctioning is also intimately associated with multiple diseases. Thus, understanding the dynamic heterogeneity of various IDPs along with their interactions with respective binding partners is an important field with immense potentials in biomolecular research. In this context, molecular docking-based computational approaches have proven to be remarkable in case of ordered proteins. Molecular docking methods essentially model the biomolecular interactions in both structural and energetic terms and use this information to characterize the putative interactions between the two participant molecules. However, direct applications of the conventional docking methods to study IDPs are largely limited by their structural heterogeneity and demands for unique IDP-centric strategies. Thus, in this chapter, we have presented an overview of current methodologies for successful docking operations involving IDPs and IDRs. These specialized methods majorly include the ensemble-based and fragment-based approaches with their own benefits and limitations. More recently, artificial intelligence and machine learning-assisted approaches are also used to significantly reduce the complexity and computational burden associated with various docking applications. Thus, this chapter aims to provide a comprehensive summary of major challenges and recent advancements of molecular docking approaches in the IDP field for their better utilization and greater applicability.Asp (D).

Availability of web servers significantly boosts citations rates of bioinformatics methods for protein function and disorder prediction

Motivation

Development of bioinformatics methods is a long, complex and resource-hungry process. Hundreds of these tools were released. While some methods are highly cited and used, many suffer relatively low citation rates. We empirically analyze a large collection of recently released methods in three diverse protein function and disorder prediction areas to identify key factors that contribute to increased citations.

Results

We show that provision of a working web server significantly boosts citation rates. On average, methods with working web servers generate three times as many citations compared to tools that are available as only source code, have no code and no server, or are no longer available. This observation holds consistently across different research areas and publication years. We also find that differences in predictive performance are unlikely to impact citation rates. Overall, our empirical results suggest that a relatively low-cost investment into the provision and long-term support of web servers would substantially increase the impact of bioinformatics tools.

Tutorial: a guide for the selection of fast and accurate computational tools for the prediction of intrinsic disorder in proteins

Intrinsic disorder is instrumental for a wide range of protein functions, and its analysis, using computational predictions from primary structures, complements secondary and tertiary structure-based approaches. In this Tutorial, we provide an overview and comparison of 23 publicly available computational tools with complementary parameters useful for intrinsic disorder prediction, partly relying on results from the Critical Assessment of protein Intrinsic Disorder prediction experiment. We consider factors such as accuracy, runtime, availability and the need for functional insights. The selected tools are available as web servers and downloadable programs, offer state-of-the-art predictions and can be used in a high-throughput manner. We provide examples and instructions for the selected tools to illustrate practical aspects related to the submission, collection and interpretation of predictions, as well as the timing and their limitations. We highlight two predictors for intrinsically disordered proteins, flDPnn as accurate and fast and IUPred as very fast and moderately accurate, while suggesting ANCHOR2 and MoRFchibi as two of the best-performing predictors for intrinsically disordered region binding. We link these tools to additional resources, including databases of predictions and web servers that integrate multiple predictive methods. Altogether, this Tutorial provides a hands-on guide to comparatively evaluating multiple predictors, submitting and collecting their own predictions, and reading and interpreting results. It is suitable for experimentalists and computational biologists interested in accurately and conveniently identifying intrinsic disorder, facilitating the functional characterization of the rapidly growing collections of protein sequences.

Comparative evaluation of AlphaFold2 and disorder predictors for prediction of intrinsic disorder, disorder content and fully disordered proteins

We expand studies of AlphaFold2 (AF2) in the context of intrinsic disorder prediction by comparing it against a broad selection of 20 accurate, popular and recently released disorder predictors. We use 25% larger benchmark dataset with 646 proteins and cover protein-level predictions of disorder content and fully disordered proteins. AF2-based disorder predictions secure a relatively high Area Under receiver operating characteristic Curve (AUC) of 0.77 and are statistically outperformed by several modern disorder predictors that secure AUCs around 0.8 with median runtime of about 20 s compared to 1200 s for AF2. Moreover, AF2 provides modestly accurate predictions of fully disordered proteins (F1 = 0.59 vs. 0.91 for the best disorder predictor) and disorder content (mean absolute error of 0.21 vs. 0.15). AF2 also generates statistically more accurate disorder predictions for about 20% of proteins that have relatively short sequences and a few disordered regions that tend to be located at the sequence termini, and which are absent of disordered protein-binding regions. Interestingly, AF2 and the most accurate disorder predictors rely on deep neural networks, suggesting that these models are useful for protein structure and disorder predictions.

DEPICTER2: a comprehensive webserver for intrinsic disorder and disorder function prediction

Intrinsic disorder in proteins is relatively abundant in nature and essential for a broad spectrum of cellular functions. While disorder can be accurately predicted from protein sequences, as it was empirically demonstrated in recent community-organized assessments, it is rather challenging to collect and compile a comprehensive prediction that covers multiple disorder functions. To this end, we introduce the DEPICTER2 (DisorderEd PredictIon CenTER) webserver that offers convenient access to a curated collection of fast and accurate disorder and disorder function predictors. This server includes a state-of-the-art disorder predictor, flDPnn, and five modern methods that cover all currently predictable disorder functions: disordered linkers and protein, peptide, DNA, RNA and lipid binding. DEPICTER2 allows selection of any combination of the six methods, batch predictions of up to 25 proteins per request and provides interactive visualization of the resulting predictions. The webserver is freely available at http://biomine.cs.vcu.edu/servers/DEPICTER2/.

TransDFL: Identification of Disordered Flexible Linkers in Proteins by Transfer Learning

Disordered flexible linkers (DFLs) are the functional disordered regions in proteins, which are the sub-regions of intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs) and play important roles in connecting domains and maintaining inter-domain interactions. Trained with the limited available DFLs, the existing DFL predictors based on the machine learning techniques tend to predict the ordered residues as DFLs, leading to a high falsepositive rate (FPR) and low prediction accuracy. Previous studies have shown that DFLs are extremely flexible disordered regions, which are usually predicted as disordered residues with high confidence [P(D) > 0.9] by an IDR predictor. Therefore, transferring an IDR predictor to an accurate DFL predictor is of great significance for understanding the functions of IDRs. In this study, we proposed a new predictor called TransDFL for identifying DFLs by transferring the RFPR-IDP predictor for IDR identification to the DFL prediction. The RFPR-IDP was pre-trained with IDR sequences to learn the general features between IDRs and DFLs, which is helpful to reduce the false positives in the ordered regions. RFPR-IDP was fine-tuned with the DFL sequences to capture the specific features of DFLs so as to be transferred into the TransDFL. Experimental results of two application scenarios (prediction of DFLs only in IDRs or prediction of DFLs in entire proteins) showed that TransDFL consistently outperformed other existing DFL predictors with higher accuracy. The corresponding web server of TransDFL can be freely accessed at http://bliulab.net/TransDFL/.

Computational prediction of disordered binding regions

One of the key features of intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs) is their ability to interact with a broad range of partner molecules. Multiple types of interacting IDRs were identified including molecular recognition fragments (MoRFs), short linear sequence motifs (SLiMs), and protein-, nucleic acids- and lipid-binding regions. Prediction of binding IDRs in protein sequences is gaining momentum in recent years. We survey 38 predictors of binding IDRs that target interactions with a diverse set of partners, such as peptides, proteins, RNA, DNA and lipids. We offer a historical perspective and highlight key events that fueled efforts to develop these methods. These tools rely on a diverse range of predictive architectures that include scoring functions, regular expressions, traditional and deep machine learning and meta-models. Recent efforts focus on the development of deep neural network-based architectures and extending coverage to RNA, DNA and lipid-binding IDRs. We analyze availability of these methods and show that providing implementations and webservers results in much higher rates of citations/use. We also make several recommendations to take advantage of modern deep network architectures, develop tools that bundle predictions of multiple and different types of binding IDRs, and work on algorithms that model structures of the resulting complexes.

Computational Prediction of Protein Intrinsically Disordered Region Related Interactions and Functions

Intrinsically Disordered Proteins (IDPs) and Regions (IDRs) exist widely. Although without well-defined structures, they participate in many important biological processes. In addition, they are also widely related to human diseases and have become potential targets in drug discovery. However, there is a big gap between the experimental annotations related to IDPs/IDRs and their actual number. In recent decades, the computational methods related to IDPs/IDRs have been developed vigorously, including predicting IDPs/IDRs, the binding modes of IDPs/IDRs, the binding sites of IDPs/IDRs, and the molecular functions of IDPs/IDRs according to different tasks. In view of the correlation between these predictors, we have reviewed these prediction methods uniformly for the first time, summarized their computational methods and predictive performance, and discussed some problems and perspectives.

CLIP: accurate prediction of disordered linear interacting peptides from protein sequences using co-evolutionary information

One of key features of intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs) is facilitation of protein-protein and protein-nucleic acids interactions. These disordered binding regions include molecular recognition features (MoRFs), short linear motifs (SLiMs) and longer binding domains. Vast majority of current predictors of disordered binding regions target MoRFs, with a handful of methods that predict SLiMs and disordered protein-binding domains. A new and broader class of disordered binding regions, linear interacting peptides (LIPs), was introduced recently and applied in the MobiDB resource. LIPs are segments in protein sequences that undergo disorder-to-order transition upon binding to a protein or a nucleic acid, and they cover MoRFs, SLiMs and disordered protein-binding domains. Although current predictors of MoRFs and disordered protein-binding regions could be used to identify some LIPs, there are no dedicated sequence-based predictors of LIPs. To this end, we introduce CLIP, a new predictor of LIPs that utilizes robust logistic regression model to combine three complementary types of inputs: co-evolutionary information derived from multiple sequence alignments, physicochemical profiles and disorder predictions. Ablation analysis suggests that the co-evolutionary information is particularly useful for this prediction and that combining the three inputs provides substantial improvements when compared to using these inputs individually. Comparative empirical assessments using low-similarity test datasets reveal that CLIP secures area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.8 and substantially improves over the results produced by the closest current tools that predict MoRFs and disordered protein-binding regions. The webserver of CLIP is freely available at http://biomine.cs.vcu.edu/servers/CLIP/ and the standalone code can be downloaded from http://yanglab.qd.sdu.edu.cn/download/CLIP/.

Prediction of protein-protein interaction sites in intrinsically disordered proteins

Intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) participate in many biological processes by interacting with other proteins, including the regulation of transcription, translation, and the cell cycle. With the increasing amount of disorder sequence data available, it is thus crucial to identify the IDP binding sites for functional annotation of these proteins. Over the decades, many computational approaches have been developed to predict protein-protein binding sites of IDP (IDP-PPIS) based on protein sequence information. Moreover, there are new IDP-PPIS predictors developed every year with the rapid development of artificial intelligence. It is thus necessary to provide an up-to-date overview of these methods in this field. In this paper, we collected 30 representative predictors published recently and summarized the databases, features and algorithms. We described the procedure how the features were generated based on public data and used for the prediction of IDP-PPIS, along with the methods to generate the feature representations. All the predictors were divided into three categories: scoring functions, machine learning-based prediction, and consensus approaches. For each category, we described the details of algorithms and their performances. Hopefully, our manuscript will not only provide a full picture of the status quo of IDP binding prediction, but also a guide for selecting different methods. More importantly, it will shed light on the inspirations for future development trends and principles.

Compositional Bias of Intrinsically Disordered Proteins and Regions and Their Predictions

Intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs) carry out many cellular functions and vary in length and placement in protein sequences. This diversity leads to variations in the underlying compositional biases, which were demonstrated for the short vs. long IDRs. We analyze compositional biases across four classes of disorder: fully disordered proteins; short IDRs; long IDRs; and binding IDRs. We identify three distinct biases: for the fully disordered proteins, the short IDRs and the long and binding IDRs combined. We also investigate compositional bias for putative disorder produced by leading disorder predictors and find that it is similar to the bias of the native disorder. Interestingly, the accuracy of disorder predictions across different methods is correlated with the correctness of the compositional bias of their predictions highlighting the importance of the compositional bias. The predictive quality is relatively low for the disorder classes with compositional bias that is the most different from the “generic” disorder bias, while being much higher for the classes with the most similar bias. We discover that different predictors perform best across different classes of disorder. This suggests that no single predictor is universally best and motivates the development of new architectures that combine models that target specific disorder classes.

Complementarity of the residue-level protein function and structure predictions in human proteins

Sequence-based predictors of the residue-level protein function and structure cover a broad spectrum of characteristics including intrinsic disorder, secondary structure, solvent accessibility and binding to nucleic acids. They were catalogued and evaluated in numerous surveys and assessments. However, methods focusing on a given characteristic are studied separately from predictors of other characteristics, while they are typically used on the same proteins. We fill this void by studying complementarity of a representative collection of methods that target different predictions using a large, taxonomically consistent, and low similarity dataset of human proteins. First, we bridge the gap between the communities that develop structure-trained vs. disorder-trained predictors of binding residues. Motivated by a recent study of the protein-binding residue predictions, we empirically find that combining the structure-trained and disorder-trained predictors of the DNA-binding and RNA-binding residues leads to substantial improvements in predictive quality. Second, we investigate whether diverse predictors generate results that accurately reproduce relations between secondary structure, solvent accessibility, interaction sites, and intrinsic disorder that are present in the experimental data. Our empirical analysis concludes that predictions accurately reflect all combinations of these relations. Altogether, this study provides unique insights that support combining results produced by diverse residue-level predictors of protein function and structure.

Disordered-Ordered Protein Binary Classification by Circular Dichroism Spectroscopy

Intrinsically disordered proteins lack a stable tertiary structure and form dynamic conformational ensembles due to their characteristic physicochemical properties and amino acid composition. They are abundant in nature and responsible for a large variety of cellular functions. While numerous bioinformatics tools have been developed for in silico disorder prediction in the last decades, there is a need for experimental methods to verify the disordered state. CD spectroscopy is widely used for protein secondary structure analysis. It is usable in a wide concentration range under various buffer conditions. Even without providing high-resolution information, it is especially useful when NMR, X-ray, or other techniques are problematic or one simply needs a fast technique to verify the structure of proteins. Here, we propose an automatized binary disorder-order classification method by analyzing far-UV CD spectroscopy data. The method needs CD data at only three wavelength points, making high-throughput data collection possible. The mathematical analysis applies the k-nearest neighbor algorithm with cosine distance function, which is independent of the spectral amplitude and thus free of concentration determination errors. Moreover, the method can be used even for strong absorbing samples, such as the case of crowded environmental conditions, if the spectrum can be recorded down to the wavelength of 212 nm. We believe the classification method will be useful in identifying disorder and will also facilitate the growth of experimental data in IDP databases. The method is implemented on a webserver and freely available for academic users.

Characterization of intrinsically disordered regions in proteins informed by human genetic diversity

All proteomes contain both proteins and polypeptide segments that don’t form a defined three-dimensional structure yet are biologically active—called intrinsically disordered proteins and regions (IDPs and IDRs). Most of these IDPs/IDRs lack useful functional annotation limiting our understanding of their importance for organism fitness. Here we characterized IDRs using protein sequence annotations of functional sites and regions available in the UniProt knowledgebase (“UniProt features”: active site, ligand-binding pocket, regions mediating protein-protein interactions, etc.). By measuring the statistical enrichment of twenty-five UniProt features in 981 IDRs of 561 human proteins, we identified eight features that are commonly located in IDRs. We then collected the genetic variant data from the general population and patient-based databases and evaluated the prevalence of population and pathogenic variations in IDPs/IDRs. We observed that some IDRs tolerate 2 to 12-times more single amino acid-substituting missense mutations than synonymous changes in the general population. However, we also found that 37% of all germline pathogenic mutations are located in disordered regions of 96 proteins. Based on the observed-to-expected frequency of mutations, we categorized 34 IDRs in 20 proteins (DDX3X, KIT, RB1, etc.) as intolerant to mutation. Finally, using statistical analysis and a machine learning approach, we demonstrate that mutation-intolerant IDRs carry a distinct signature of functional features. Our study presents a novel approach to assign functional importance to IDRs by leveraging the wealth of available genetic data, which will aid in a deeper understating of the role of IDRs in biological processes and disease mechanisms.

Deep learning in prediction of intrinsic disorder in proteins

Intrinsic disorder prediction is an active area that has developed over 100 predictors. We identify and investigate a recent trend towards the development of deep neural network (DNN)-based methods. The first DNN-based method was released in 2013 and since 2019 deep learners account for majority of the new disorder predictors. We find that the 13 currently available DNN-based predictors are diverse in their topologies, sizes of their networks and the inputs that they utilize. We empirically show that the deep learners are statistically more accurate than other types of disorder predictors using the blind test dataset from the recent community assessment of intrinsic disorder predictions (CAID). We also identify several well-rounded DNN-based predictors that are accurate, fast and/or conveniently available. The popularity, favorable predictive performance and architectural flexibility suggest that deep networks are likely to fuel the development of future disordered predictors. Novel hybrid designs of deep networks could be used to adequately accommodate for diversity of types and flavors of intrinsic disorder. We also discuss scarcity of the DNN-based methods for the prediction of disordered binding regions and the need to develop more accurate methods for this prediction.

Intrinsically disordered proteins: Ensembles at the limits of Anfinsen's dogma

Intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) are proteins that lack rigid 3D structure. Hence, they are often misconceived to present a challenge to Anfinsen's dogma. However, IDPs exist as ensembles that sample a quasi-continuum of rapidly interconverting conformations and, as such, may represent proteins at the extreme limit of the Anfinsen postulate. IDPs play important biological roles and are key components of the cellular protein interaction network (PIN). Many IDPs can interconvert between disordered and ordered states as they bind to appropriate partners. Conformational dynamics of IDPs contribute to conformational noise in the cell. Thus, the dysregulation of IDPs contributes to increased noise and "promiscuous" interactions. This leads to PIN rewiring to output an appropriate response underscoring the critical role of IDPs in cellular decision making. Nonetheless, IDPs are not easily tractable experimentally. Furthermore, in the absence of a reference conformation, discerning the energy landscape representation of the weakly funneled IDPs in terms of reaction coordinates is challenging. To understand conformational dynamics in real time and decipher how IDPs recognize multiple binding partners with high specificity, several sophisticated knowledge-based and physics-based in silico sampling techniques have been developed. Here, using specific examples, we highlight recent advances in energy landscape visualization and molecular dynamics simulations to discern conformational dynamics and discuss how the conformational preferences of IDPs modulate their function, especially in phenotypic switching. Finally, we discuss recent progress in identifying small molecules targeting IDPs underscoring the potential therapeutic value of IDPs. Understanding structure and function of IDPs can not only provide new insight on cellular decision making but may also help to refine and extend Anfinsen's structure/function paradigm.

Surveying over 100 predictors of intrinsic disorder in proteins

INTRODUCTION

Intrinsic disorder prediction field develops, assesses, and deploys computational predictors of disorder in protein sequences and constructs and disseminates databases of these predictions. Over 40 years of research resulted in the release of numerous resources.

AREAS COVERED

We identify and briefly summarize the most comprehensive to date collection of over 100 disorder predictors. We focus on their predictive models, availability and predictive performance. We categorize and study them from a historical point of view to highlight informative trends.

EXPERT OPINION

We find a consistent trend of improvements in predictive quality as newer and more advanced predictors are developed. The original focus on machine learning methods has shifted to meta-predictors in early 2010s, followed by a recent transition to deep learning. The use of deep learners will continue in foreseeable future given recent and convincing success of these methods. Moreover, a broad range of resources that facilitate convenient collection of accurate disorder predictions is available to users. They include web servers and standalone programs for disorder prediction, servers that combine prediction of disorder and disorder functions, and large databases of pre-computed predictions. We also point to the need to address the shortage of accurate methods that predict disordered binding regions.

DisoLipPred: accurate prediction of disordered lipid-binding residues in protein sequences with deep recurrent networks and transfer learning

MOTIVATION

Intrinsically disordered protein regions interact with proteins, nucleic acids and lipids. Regions that bind lipids are implicated in a wide spectrum of cellular functions and several human diseases. Motivated by the growing amount of experimental data for these interactions and lack of tools that can predict them from the protein sequence, we develop DisoLipPred, the first predictor of the disordered lipid-binding residues (DLBRs).

RESULTS

DisoLipPred relies on a deep bidirectional recurrent network that implements three innovative features: transfer learning, bypass module that sidesteps predictions for putative structured residues, and expanded inputs that cover physiochemical properties associated with the protein-lipid interactions. Ablation analysis shows that these features drive predictive quality of DisoLipPred. Tests on an independent test dataset and the yeast proteome reveal that DisoLipPred generates accurate results and that none of the related existing tools can be used to indirectly identify DLBR. We also show that DisoLipPred's predictions complement the results generated by predictors of the transmembrane regions. Altogether, we conclude that DisoLipPred provides high-quality predictions of DLBRs that complement the currently available methods.

AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION

DisoLipPred's webserver is available at http://biomine.cs.vcu.edu/servers/DisoLipPred/.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

flDPnn: Accurate intrinsic disorder prediction with putative propensities of disorder functions

Identification of intrinsic disorder in proteins relies in large part on computational predictors, which demands that their accuracy should be high. Since intrinsic disorder carries out a broad range of cellular functions, it is desirable to couple the disorder and disorder function predictions. We report a computational tool, flDPnn, that provides accurate, fast and comprehensive disorder and disorder function predictions from protein sequences. The recent Critical Assessment of protein Intrinsic Disorder prediction (CAID) experiment and results on other test datasets demonstrate that flDPnn offers accurate predictions of disorder, fully disordered proteins and four common disorder functions. These predictions are substantially better than the results of the existing disorder predictors and methods that predict functions of disorder. Ablation tests reveal that the high predictive performance stems from innovative ways used in flDPnn to derive sequence profiles and encode inputs. flDPnn's webserver is available at http://biomine.cs.vcu.edu/servers/flDPnn/.

QUARTERplus: Accurate disorder predictions integrated with interpretable residue-level quality assessment scores

A recent advance in the disorder prediction field is the development of the quality assessment (QA) scores. QA scores complement the propensities produced by the disorder predictors by identifying regions where these predictions are more likely to be correct. We develop, empirically test and release a new QA tool, QUARTERplus, that addresses several key drawbacks of the current QA method, QUARTER. QUARTERplus is the first solution that utilizes QA scores and the associated input disorder predictions to produce very accurate disorder predictions with the help of a modern deep learning meta-model. The deep neural network utilizes the QA scores to identify and fix the regions where the original/input disorder predictions are poor. More importantly, the accurate QUATERplus's predictions are accompanied by easy to interpret residue-level QA scores that reliably quantify their residue-level predictive quality. We provide these interpretable QA scores for QUARTERplus and 10 other popular disorder predictors. Empirical tests on a large and independent (low similarity) test dataset show that QUARTERplus predictions secure AUC = 0.93 and are statistically more accurate than the results of twelve state-of-the-art disorder predictors. We also demonstrate that the new QA scores produced by QUARTERplus are highly correlated with the actual predictive quality and that they can be effectively used to identify regions of correct disorder predictions. This feature empowers the users to easily identify which parts of the predictions generated by the modern disorder predictors are more trustworthy. QUARTERplus is available as a convenient webserver at http://biomine.cs.vcu.edu/servers/QUARTERplus/.

APOD: accurate sequence-based predictor of disordered flexible linkers

Motivation

Disordered flexible linkers (DFLs) are abundant and functionally important intrinsically disordered regions that connect protein domains and structural elements within domains and which facilitate disorder-based allosteric regulation. Although computational estimates suggest that thousands of proteins have DFLs, they were annotated experimentally in <200 proteins. This substantial annotation gap can be reduced with the help of accurate computational predictors. The sole predictor of DFLs, DFLpred, trade-off accuracy for shorter runtime by excluding relevant but computationally costly predictive inputs. Moreover, it relies on the local/window-based information while lacking to consider useful protein-level characteristics.

Results

We conceptualize, design and test APOD (Accurate Predictor Of DFLs), the first highly accurate predictor that utilizes both local- and protein-level inputs that quantify propensity for disorder, sequence composition, sequence conservation and selected putative structural properties. Consequently, APOD offers significantly more accurate predictions when compared with its faster predecessor, DFLpred, and several other alternative ways to predict DFLs. These improvements stem from the use of a more comprehensive set of inputs that cover the protein-level information and the application of a more sophisticated predictive model, a well-parametrized support vector machine. APOD achieves area under the curve = 0.82 (28% improvement over DFLpred) and Matthews correlation coefficient = 0.42 (180% increase over DFLpred) when tested on an independent/low-similarity test dataset. Consequently, APOD is a suitable choice for accurate and small-scale prediction of DFLs.

Availability and implementation

https://yanglab.nankai.edu.cn/APOD/.

Prediction of protein-binding residues: dichotomy of sequence-based methods developed using structured complexes versus disordered proteins

MOTIVATION

There are over 30 sequence-based predictors of the protein-binding residues (PBRs). They use either structure-annotated or disorder-annotated training datasets, potentially creating a dichotomy where the structure-/disorder-specific models may not be able to cross-over to accurately predict the other type. Moreover, the structure-trained predictors were shown to substantially cross-predict PBRs among residues that interact with non-protein partners (nucleic acids and small ligands). We address these issues by performing first-of-its-kind comparative study of a representative collection of disorder- and structure-trained predictors using a comprehensive benchmark set with the structure- and disorder-derived annotations of PBRs (to analyze the cross-over) and the protein-, nucleic acid- and small ligand-binding proteins (to study the cross-predictions).

RESULTS

Three predictors provide accurate results: SCRIBER, ANCHOR and disoRDPbind. Some of the structure-trained methods make accurate predictions on the structure-annotated proteins. Similarly, the disorder-trained predictors predict well on the disorder-annotated proteins. However, the considered predictors generally fail to cross-over, with the exception of SCRIBER. Our study also reveals that virtually all methods substantially cross-predict PBRs, except for SCRIBER for the structure-annotated proteins and disoRDPbind for the disorder-annotated proteins. We formulate a novel hybrid predictor, hybridPBRpred, that combines results produced by disoRDPbind and SCRIBER to accurately predict disorder- and structure-annotated PBRs. HybridPBRpred generates accurate results that cross-over structure- and disorder-annotated proteins and produces relatively low amount of cross-predictions, offering an accurate alternative to predict PBRs.

AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION

HybridPBRpred webserver, benchmark dataset and supplementary information are available at http://biomine.cs.vcu.edu/servers/hybridPBRpred/.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Comparative Assessment of Intrinsic Disorder Predictions with a Focus on Protein and Nucleic Acid-Binding Proteins

With over 60 disorder predictors, users need help navigating the predictor selection task. We review 28 surveys of disorder predictors, showing that only 11 include assessment of predictive performance. We identify and address a few drawbacks of these past surveys. To this end, we release a novel benchmark dataset with reduced similarity to the training sets of the considered predictors. We use this dataset to perform a first-of-its-kind comparative analysis that targets two large functional families of disordered proteins that interact with proteins and with nucleic acids. We show that limiting sequence similarity between the benchmark and the training datasets has a substantial impact on predictive performance. We also demonstrate that predictive quality is sensitive to the use of the well-annotated order and inclusion of the fully structured proteins in the benchmark datasets, both of which should be considered in future assessments. We identify three predictors that provide favorable results using the new benchmark set. While we find that VSL2B offers the most accurate and robust results overall, ESpritz-DisProt and SPOT-Disorder perform particularly well for disordered proteins. Moreover, we find that predictions for the disordered protein-binding proteins suffer low predictive quality compared to generic disordered proteins and the disordered nucleic acids-binding proteins. This can be explained by the high disorder content of the disordered protein-binding proteins, which makes it difficult for the current methods to accurately identify ordered regions in these proteins. This finding motivates the development of a new generation of methods that would target these difficult-to-predict disordered proteins. We also discuss resources that support users in collecting and identifying high-quality disorder predictions.

Liquid-Liquid Phase Separation by Intrinsically Disordered Protein Regions of Viruses: Roles in Viral Life Cycle and Control of Virus-Host Interactions

Intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) are unable to adopt a unique 3D structure under physiological conditions and thus exist as highly dynamic conformational ensembles. IDPs are ubiquitous and widely spread in the protein realm. In the last decade, compelling experimental evidence has been gathered, pointing to the ability of IDPs and intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs) to undergo liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS), a phenomenon driving the formation of membrane-less organelles (MLOs). These biological condensates play a critical role in the spatio-temporal organization of the cell, where they exert a multitude of key biological functions, ranging from transcriptional regulation and silencing to control of signal transduction networks. After introducing IDPs and LLPS, we herein survey available data on LLPS by IDPs/IDRs of viral origin and discuss their functional implications. We distinguish LLPS associated with viral replication and trafficking of viral components, from the LLPS-mediated interference of viruses with host cell functions. We discuss emerging evidence on the ability of plant virus proteins to interfere with the regulation of MLOs of the host and propose that bacteriophages can interfere with bacterial LLPS, as well. We conclude by discussing how LLPS could be targeted to treat phase separation-associated diseases, including viral infections.

DEPICTER: Intrinsic Disorder and Disorder Function Prediction Server

Computational predictions of the intrinsic disorder and its functions are instrumental to facilitate annotation for the millions of unannotated proteins. However, access to these predictors is fragmented and requires substantial effort to find them and to collect and combine their results. The DEPICTER (DisorderEd PredictIon CenTER) server provides first-of-its-kind centralized access to 10 popular disorder and disorder function predictions that cover protein and nucleic acids binding, linkers, and moonlighting regions. It automates the prediction process, runs user-selected methods on the server side, visualizes the results, and outputs all predictions in a consistent and easy-to-parse format. DEPICTER also includes two accurate consensus predictors of disorder and disordered protein binding. Empirical tests on an independent (low similarity) benchmark dataset reveal that the computational tools included in DEPICTER generate accurate predictions that are significantly better than the results secured using sequence alignment. The DEPICTER server is freely available at http://biomine.cs.vcu.edu/servers/DEPICTER/.