Incorporating driving volatility measures in safety performance functions: Improving safety at signalized intersections

Safety in higher level automated vehicles: Investigating edge cases in crashes of vehicles equipped with automated driving systems

With emerging Automated Driving Systems (ADS) representing Automated Vehicles (AVs) of Level 3 or higher as classified by the Society of Automotive Engineers, several AV manufacturers are testing their vehicles on public roadways in the U.S. The safety performance of AVs has become a major concern for the transportation industry. Several ADS-equipped vehicle crashes have been reported to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) in recent years. Scrutinizing these crashes can reveal rare or complex scenarios beyond the normal capabilities of AV technologies called "edge cases." Investigating edge-case crashes helps AV companies prepare vehicles to handle these unusual scenarios and, as such, improves traffic safety. Through analyzing the NHTSA data from July 2021 to February 2023, this study utilizes an unsupervised machine learning technique, hierarchical clustering, to identify edge cases in ADS-equipped vehicle crashes. Fifteen out of 189 observations are identified as edge cases, representing 8 % of the population. Injuries occurred in 10 % of all crashes (19 out of 189), but the proportion rose to 27 % for edge cases (4 out of 15 edge cases). Based on the results, edge cases could be initiated by AVs, humans, infrastructure/environment, or their combination. Humans can be identified as one of the contributors to the onset of edge-case crashes in 60 % of the edge cases (9 out of 15 edge cases). The main scenarios for edge cases include unlawful behaviors of crash partners, absence of a safety driver within the AV, precrash disengagement, and complex events challenging for ADS, e.g., unexpected obstacles, unclear road markings, and sudden and unexpected changes in traffic flow, such as abrupt road congestion or sudden stopped traffic from a crash. Identifying and investigating edge cases is crucial for improving transportation safety and building public trust in AVs.

Investigating transportation safety in disadvantaged communities by integrating crash and Environmental Justice data

Recent efforts to identify disadvantaged communities (DACs) on a census tract level have evoked possibilities of attaining transportation justice and vision zero goals in these areas. To identify DACs, the United States Department of Transportation (USDOT) has developed six comprehensive indicators: economy, environment, equity, health, resilience, and transportation access. The indicators are used to explore the associations between DACs (in 71,728 census tracts) and five years of fatal crashes, providing a comprehensive understanding of safety risks. Specifically, using data on DACs and linking it with census and crash data, this study aims to understand the complex connections between safety (captured through fatal crashes) and disadvantages that communities confront due to a convergence of multiple challenges and burdens using Zero-Hurdle Negative Binomial models. The results reveal that health, resilience, and transportation-disadvantaged tracts are associated with more fatal crashes. The study also found the presence of a higher percentage of the population with bachelor's degrees and increased use of public transportation are correlated with fewer fatal crashes. Also, a higher fatal crash rate is observed in disadvantaged census tracts where a high proportion of the Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander, and American Indian or Alaska Native populations live. This implies that targeted interventions can be explored further in tracts that show high correlations with fatal crashes. The findings contribute to traffic safety by highlighting the risks in DACs, which can help design and implement traffic safety interventions. The insights gained from this study can inform decision-making and help to guide the development of more equitable traffic safety programs in disadvantaged communities.

CAV-enabled data analytics for enhancing adaptive signal control safety environment

Given the connected and autonomous vehicle (CAV) generated trajectories as a "floating sensor" data source to obtain high resolution CAV-generated mobility data at intersections, to ensure maximum safety effect while maintaining efficient operations at the same time is actually a complex task in traffic management. Literature indicates that methods for evaluating the CAV-generated data potentials focusing on safety benefits are still immature. The primary reason lies in lack of underlying mechanism and data models to make the data intelligent to enhance safety environment through adaptive traffic signal control. On top of the developed intelligent CAV-generated mobility data fusion model framework in support of adaptive traffic signal control, parameters and models included in Surrogate Safety Assessment Model (SSAM) are integrated to indicate the risk of near crashes and then evaluate the safety environment. A proof-of-concept study is conducted in Uptown Cincinnati, Ohio to test the developed data fusion models in terms of safety enhancement, along with operational benefits. In the tests, the CAV-generated data supported developed adaptive signal plan is compared with the basic signal plans (i.e., pretimed signal plan, actuated signal plan) that supported by traditional detection systems. The results indicate that the adaptive signal plan has a great potential to decrease at most 91% of total collision risk (measured in probability), 71% of crossing collision risk, 90% of rear end collisions risk and 100% of lane-changing collisions risk, compared with basic signal plans. Meanwhile, it increases up to 6.8% of throughput, and decreases up to 91.49% of average delay, 96.23% of queue length and 75.00% of number of stops. The benefits of operation efficiency include reduced average delay and reduced number of stops; but no improvement in reducing collisions severity that is reflected by high maximum speed and relative speed of two vehicles involved in a potential collision.

Crash harm before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: Evidence for spatial heterogeneity in Tennessee

Major concerns have been raised about road safety during the COVID-19 pandemic in the US, as the crash fatalities have increased, despite the substantial reduction in traffic. However, a comprehensive analysis of safety-critical events on roadways based on a broader set of traffic safety metrics and their correlates is needed. In addition to fatalities, this study uses changes in total crashes and total monetary harm as additional measures of safety. A comprehensive and unique time-series database of crashes and socio-economic variables is created at the county level in Tennessee. Statistics show that while fatal crashes increase by 8.2%, total crashes decrease by 15.3%, and the total harm cost is lower by about $1.76 billion during COVID-19 (2020) compared with pre-COVID-19 conditions (2019). Several models, including generalized least squares linear, Poisson, and geographically weighted regression models using the differences between 2020 and 2019 values, are estimated to rigorously quantify the correlates of fatalities, crashes, and crash harm. The results indicate that compared to the pre-pandemic periods, fatal crashes that occurred during the pandemic are associated with more speeding & reckless behaviors and varied across jurisdictions. Fatal crashes are more likely to happen on interstates and dark-not-lighted roads and involve commercial trucks. These same factors largely contribute to crash harm. In addition, a greater number of long trips per person not staying home during COVID-19 is found to be associated with more crashes and crash harm. These results can inform policymaking to strengthen traffic law enforcement through appropriate countermeasures, such as the placement of warning signs and the reduction of the speed limit in hotspots.

Predicting intersection crash frequency using connected vehicle data: A framework for geographical random forest

Accurate crash frequency prediction is critical for proactive safety management. The emerging connected vehicles technology provides us with a wealth of vehicular motion data, which enables a better connection between crash frequency and driving behaviors. However, appropriately dealing with the spatial dependence of crash frequency and multitudinous driving features has been a difficult but critical challenge in the prediction process. To this end, this study aims to investigate a new Artificial Intelligence technique called Geographical Random Forest (GRF) that can address spatial heterogeneity and retain all potential predictors. By harnessing more than 2.2 billion high-resolution connected vehicle Basic Safety Message (BSM) observations from the Safety Pilot Model Deployment in Ann Arbor, MI, 30 indicators of driving volatility are extracted, including speed, longitudinal and lateral acceleration, and yaw rate. The developed GRF was implemented to predict rear-end crash frequency at intersections. The results show that: 1) rear-end crashes are more likely to happen at intersections connecting minor roads compared to major roads; 2) a higher number of hard acceleration and deceleration events beyond two standard deviations in the longitudinal direction is a leading indicator of rear-end crashes; 3) the optimal GRF significantly outperforms Global Random Forest, with a 9% lower test error and a substantially better fit; and 4) geographical visualization of variable importance highlights the presence of spatial non-stationarity. The proposed framework can proactively identify at-risk intersections and alert drivers when leading indicators of driving volatility tend to worsen.