Enzymatic glutaredoxin-dependent method to determine glutathione and protein S-glutathionylation using fluorescent eosin-glutathione

Emerging chemistry and biology in protein glutathionylation

Protein S-glutathionylation serves a regulatory role in proteins and modulates distinct biological processes implicated in health and diseases. Despite challenges in analyzing the dynamic and reversible nature of S-glutathionylation, recent chemical and biological methods have significantly advanced the field of S-glutathionylation, culminating in selective identification and detection, structural motif analysis, and functional studies of S-glutathionylation. This review will highlight emerging studies of protein glutathionylation, beginning by introducing biochemical tools that enable mass spectrometric identification and live-cell imaging of S-glutathionylation. Next, it will spotlight recent examples of S-glutathionylation regulating physiology and inflammation. Lastly, we will feature two emerging lines of glutathionylation research in cryptic cysteine glutathionylation and protein C-glutathionylation.

A colorimetric method to measure oxidized, reduced and total glutathione levels in erythrocytes

Background

The most important antioxidant for erythrocytes is glutathione. In this study, a non-enzymatic recycling spectrophotometric method was developed to measure oxidized and reduced glutathione (GSH) levels in erythrocytes. The newly developed method consists of two steps. In the first step, the levels of GSH were determined in the sample. Subsequently, total glutathione levels were measured by reducing the oxidized glutathione (GSSG) with sodium borohydride (NaBH4). Half of the difference between total glutathione and GSH gives the GSSG.

Results

The new method was linear between 0 and 3000 μmol/L (r2 = 0.999). The percentage recovery measured by the developed method was 100.2 ± 2.4%. The total precision of the total glutathione, GSH and GSSG was 1.26%, 1.02% and 6.65%, respectively. GSH levels were significantly lower in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM), while GSSG levels were significantly higher (p < 0.05). Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels were negatively correlated with GSH levels, whereas positively correlated with GSSG (p < 0.05).

Conclusions

In conclusion, this method is easy to apply in routine practice with high accuracy, precision and reproducibility.