Catalytic subunit of cAMP-dependent protein kinase from a catch muscle of the bivalve mollusk Mytilus galloprovincialis: purification, characterization, and phosphorylation of muscle proteins

Biological roles of cAMP: variations on a theme in the different kingdoms of life

Cyclic AMP (cAMP) plays a key regulatory role in most types of cells; however, the pathways controlled by cAMP may present important differences between organisms and between tissues within a specific organism. Changes in cAMP levels are caused by multiple triggers, most affecting adenylyl cyclases, the enzymes that synthesize cAMP. Adenylyl cyclases form a large and diverse family including soluble forms and others with one or more transmembrane domains. Regulatory mechanisms for the soluble adenylyl cyclases involve either interaction with diverse proteins, as happens in Escherichia coli or yeasts, or with calcium or bicarbonate ions, as occurs in mammalian cells. The transmembrane cyclases can be regulated by a variety of proteins, among which the α subunit and the βγ complex from G proteins coupled to membrane receptors are prominent. cAMP levels also are controlled by the activity of phosphodiesterases, enzymes that hydrolyze cAMP. Phosphodiesterases can be regulated by cAMP, cGMP or calcium-calmodulin or by phosphorylation by different protein kinases. Regulation through cAMP depends on its binding to diverse proteins, its proximal targets, this in turn causing changes in a variety of distal targets. Specifically, binding of cAMP to regulatory subunits of cAMP-dependent protein kinases (PKAs) affects the activity of substrates of PKA, binding to exchange proteins directly activated by cAMP (Epac) regulates small GTPases, binding to transcription factors such as the cAMP receptor protein (CRP) or the virulence factor regulator (Vfr) modifies the rate of transcription of certain genes, while cAMP binding to ion channels modulates their activity directly. Further studies on cAMP signalling will have important implications, not only for advancing fundamental knowledge but also for identifying targets for the development of new therapeutic agents.

Molecular basis of the catch state in molluscan smooth muscles: a catchy challenge

The catch state (or 'catch') of molluscan smooth muscles is a passive holding state that occurs after cessation of stimulation. During catch, force and, in particular, resistance to stretch are maintained for long time periods with low (or no) energy consumption at basal intracellular free [Ca2+]. The catch state is initiated by Ca2+-stimulated dephosphorylation of the titin-like protein twitchin and is inhibited by cAMP-dependent phosphorylation of twitchin. In addition, catch is pH sensitive, but the reason for this is unknown. According to a traditional model, catch is due to slower cross-bridge cycles where myosin heads remain longer attached to the actin filaments after force generation, possibly caused by a hindered release of ADP from the myosin heads. However, this model was disproved by recent findings which showed that (i) inhibitors of myosin function, such as vanadate, do not affect catch force; (ii) factors which terminate the catch state do not accelerate myosin head detachment kinetics and (iii) a catch-like high resistance to stretch is still inducible when force development is prevented. Thus, catch probably involves passive linkage structures interconnecting the myofilaments (catch linkages). For example twitchin could (i) tie myosin heads to the thin filaments, (ii) mechanically lock them in a stretch resistant state or (iii) interconnect thick and thin filaments directly. However, it is questionable if these mechanisms are sufficient since twitchin seems to be about 15-times less abundant than myosin. Therefore, in addition, interconnections between thick filaments could exist, which could involve e.g. paramyosin or twitchin. Catch could even involve changes in the compliance of thick filaments. The function of myorod, found specifically in catch muscles in equal abundance with myosin, is not known. The suggestion is made here that catch linkages are present already during active contraction either as ratchet-like elements resisting stretch and not opposing shortening or in some kind of 'standby' mode ready to transform suddenly into the working mode by stretches or after Ca2+ removal following cessation of stimulation.

Invertebrate muscles: thin and thick filament structure; molecular basis of contraction and its regulation, catch and asynchronous muscle

This is the second in a series of canonical reviews on invertebrate muscle. We cover here thin and thick filament structure, the molecular basis of force generation and its regulation, and two special properties of some invertebrate muscle, catch and asynchronous muscle. Invertebrate thin filaments resemble vertebrate thin filaments, although helix structure and tropomyosin arrangement show small differences. Invertebrate thick filaments, alternatively, are very different from vertebrate striated thick filaments and show great variation within invertebrates. Part of this diversity stems from variation in paramyosin content, which is greatly increased in very large diameter invertebrate thick filaments. Other of it arises from relatively small changes in filament backbone structure, which results in filaments with grossly similar myosin head placements (rotating crowns of heads every 14.5 nm) but large changes in detail (distances between heads in azimuthal registration varying from three to thousands of crowns). The lever arm basis of force generation is common to both vertebrates and invertebrates, and in some invertebrates this process is understood on the near atomic level. Invertebrate actomyosin is both thin (tropomyosin:troponin) and thick (primarily via direct Ca(++) binding to myosin) filament regulated, and most invertebrate muscles are dually regulated. These mechanisms are well understood on the molecular level, but the behavioral utility of dual regulation is less so. The phosphorylation state of the thick filament associated giant protein, twitchin, has been recently shown to be the molecular basis of catch. The molecular basis of the stretch activation underlying asynchronous muscle activity, however, remains unresolved.

Identification of multiple isoforms of the cAMP-dependent protein kinase catalytic subunit in the bivalve mollusc Mytilus galloprovincialis

Several isoforms of the cAMP-dependent protein kinase catalytic subunit (C-subunit) were separated from the posterior adductor muscle and the mantle tissues of the sea mussel Mytilus galloprovincialis by cation exchange chromatography, and identified by: (a) protein kinase activity; (b) antibody recognition; and (c) peptide mass fingerprinting. Some of the isozymes seemed to be tissue-specific, and all them were phosphorylated at serine and threonine residues and showed slight but significant differences in their apparent molecular mass values, which ranged from 41.3 to 44.5 kDa. The results from the MS analysis suggest that at least some of the mussel C-subunit isoforms arise as a result of alternative splicing events. Furthermore, several peptide sequences from mussel C-subunits, determined by de novo sequencing, showed a high degree of homology with the mammalian Calpha-isoform, and contained some structural motifs that are essential for catalytic function. On the other hand, no significant differences were observed in the kinetic parameters of C-subunit isoforms, determined by using synthetic peptides as substrate and inhibitor. However, the C-subunit isoforms separated from the mantle tissue differed in their ability to phosphorylate in vitro some proteins present in a mantle extract.

"Twitchin-actin linkage hypothesis" for the catch mechanism in molluscan muscles: evidence that twitchin interacts with myosin, myorod, and paramyosin core and affects properties of actomyosin

"Twitchin-actin linkage hypothesis" for the catch mechanism in molluscan smooth muscles postulates in vivo existence of twitchin links between thin and thick filaments that arise in a phosphorylation-dependent manner [N.S. Shelud'ko, G.G. Matusovskaya, T.V. Permyakova, O.S. Matusovsky, Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 432 (2004) 269-277]. In this paper, we proposed a scheme for a possible catch mechanism involving twitchin links and regulated thin filaments. The experimental evidence in support of the scheme is provided. It was found that twitchin can interact not only with mussel myosin and rabbit F-actin but also with the paramyosin core of thick filaments, myorod, mussel thin filaments, "natural" F-actin from mussel, and skeletal myosin from rabbit. No difference was revealed in binding of twitchin with mussel and rabbit myosin. The capability of twitchin to interact with all thick filament proteins suggests that putative twitchin links can be attached to any site of thick filaments. Addition of twitchin to a mixture of actin and paramyosin filaments, or to a mixture of Ca(2+)-regulated actin and myosin filaments under relaxing conditions caused in both cases similar changes in the optical properties of suspensions, indicating an interaction and aggregation of the filaments. The interaction of actin and myosin filaments in the presence of twitchin under relaxing conditions was not accompanied by an appreciable increase in the MgATPase activity. We suggest that in both cases aggregation of filaments was caused by formation of twitchin links between the filaments. We also demonstrate that native thin filaments from the catch muscle of the mussel Crenomytilus grayanus are Ca(2+)-regulated. Twitchin inhibits the ability of thin filaments to activate myosin MgATPase in the presence of Ca(2+). We suggest that twitchin inhibition of the actin-myosin interaction is due to twitchin-induced switching of the thin filaments to the inactive state.

Phosphorylation of myorod (catchin) by kinases tightly associated to molluscan and vertebrate smooth muscle myosins

Myorod, also known as catchin, a newly discovered component of molluscan smooth muscle thick filaments, is an alternative product of the myosin heavy chain gene. It contains a C-terminal rod part that is identical to that part of myosin and a unique N-terminal domain that is very small relative to the myosin head domain. The role of myorod in contraction or relaxation of this muscle type is unknown. In the present study we demonstrated that myorod was phosphorylated not only by a kinase endogenous to molluscan myosin and twitchin but also to vertebrate smooth muscle myosin light chain kinase (MLCK). The rates and maximal levels of phosphorylation were up to threefold higher than those observed by protein kinase A with clear optima at the physiological salt concentrations. Using a mild digestion with chymotrypsin we isolated an 11 kDa phosphopeptide and showed that the phosphorylation site was located at the N-terminal domain of myorod at Thr 141 position. The sequence around this site exhibited a high degree of similarity to that expected for the substrate recognition site of MLCK. The phosphorylation rates strongly depended on the ionic conditions indicating that this site could be readily sterically blocked during myorod polymerization. Another component of the thick filaments involved in regulation of the catch state, twitchin, was phosphorylated by MLCK and exhibited endogenous myorod kinase and MLCK activities. A possible role of these phosphorylation reactions in the regulation of molluscan smooth muscles is discussed.