Addressing Goals of Parents of Hospitalized Children: A Qualitative Analysis of Parents' and Physicians' Perspectives

Experiences of Inpatient Healthcare Services Among Children With Medical Complexity and Their Families: A Scoping Review

BACKGROUND

Children with medical complexity (CMC) have high healthcare utilization and face unique challenges during hospital admissions. The evidence describing their experiences of inpatient care is distributed across disciplines. The aim of this scoping review was to map the evidence related to the inpatient experience of care for CMC and their families, particularly related to key aspects and methodological approaches, and identify gaps that warrant further study.

METHODS

This scoping review was conducted in accordance with JBI methodology and included all studies that reported experiences of acute hospital care for CMC/families. All study designs were included. Databases searched included EMBASE, CINAHL Plus with Full Text, Web of Science, MEDLINE(R) and APA PsycInfo from 2000 to 2022. Details about the participants, concepts, study methods and key findings were abstracted using a data abstraction tool. A thematic analysis was conducted.

RESULTS

Forty-nine papers were included: 27 qualitative studies, 10 quantitative studies, six mixed methods studies, two descriptive studies and four reviews. Some quantitative studies used validated instruments to measure experience of care, but many used non-validated surveys. There were a few interventional studies with a small sample size. Results of thematic analysis described the importance of negotiating care roles, shared decision-making, common goal setting, relationship-building, communication, sharing expertise and the hospital setting itself.

CONCLUSION

CMC and families value relational elements of care and partnering through sharing expertise, decision-making and collaborative goal-setting when admitted to hospital.

PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

This review was conducted in alignment with the principles of patient and family engagement. The review was conceptualized, co-designed and conducted with the full engagement of the project's parent-partner. This team member was involved in all stages from constructing the review question, to developing the protocol, screening articles and drafting this manuscript.

Liminal Space: A Retrospective Content Analysis of Ethics Consultation for Patients Aged 18-26

PURPOSE

To characterize the primary ethical issue and contextual features of ethics consultation for patients aged 18-26 years based on setting (adult vs. pediatric).

METHODS

A retrospective review of 965 ethics consultation notes to identify patients aged 18-26 years cared for in the pediatric or adult setting between January 1, 2016-December 31, 2020. We collected demographic information and used conceptual content analysis to identify the primary ethical issue and contextual features for each consult and analyzed these using descriptive statistics.

RESULTS

We identified 46 consults (30 adult and 16 pediatric) for 40 unique patients (28 adult and 12 pediatric). The median age was 19 years in the pediatric setting and 24 in the adult setting. Fifty-three percent were female, 95% non-Hispanic, 68% White, and 76% were inpatient. The primary ethical issue in the adult setting was Refusal of Recommended Treatment (20%), while the dominant contextual issue was Communication Disputes/Conflicts Between the Staff and Patient (23%). The primary ethical issue for the pediatric setting was Goals of Care (31%) and the dominant contextual feature was concerns for Quality of Life (31%).

DISCUSSION

The primary ethical issues and related contextual features this population experiences differ based on setting. Improved understanding of adolescent and young adult development, especially related to values formation, decision-making, and communication skills training may ameliorate some of these challenges. Referral patterns for this age group overall and particularly for patients on the ends of the spectrum and inpatients raise concerns for ethics consultation use. Further education about ethics services is recommended.

Goals of Care Among Parents of Children Receiving Palliative Care

Importance

While knowing the goals of care (GOCs) for children receiving pediatric palliative care (PPC) are crucial for guiding the care they receive, how parents prioritize these goals and how their priorities may change over time is not known.

Objective

To determine parental prioritization of GOCs and patterns of change over time for parents of children receiving palliative care.

Design, Setting, and Participants

A Pediatric Palliative Care Research Network's Shared Data and Research cohort study with data collected at 0, 2, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months in hospital, outpatient, or home settings from April 10, 2017, to February 15, 2022, at 7 PPC programs based at children's hospitals across the US. Participants included parents of patients, birth to 30 years of age, who received PPC services.

Exposures

Analyses were adjusted for demographic characteristics, number of complex chronic conditions, and time enrolled in PPC.

Main Outcomes

Parents' importance scores, as measured using a discrete choice experiment, of 5 preselected GOCs: seeking quality of life (QOL), health, comfort, disease modification, or life extension. Importance scores for the 5 GOCs summed to 100.

Results

A total of 680 parents of 603 patients reported on GOCs. Median patient age was 4.4 (IQR, 0.8-13.2) years and 320 patients were male (53.1%). At baseline, parents scored QOL as the most important goal (mean score, 31.5 [SD, 8.4]), followed by health (26.3 [SD, 7.5]), comfort (22.4 [SD, 11.7]), disease modification (10.9 [SD, 9.2]), and life extension (8.9 [SD, 9.9]). Importantly, parents varied substantially in their baseline scores for each goal (IQRs more than 9.4), but across patients in different complex chronic conditions categories, the mean scores varied only slightly (means differ 8.7 or less). For each additional study month since PPC initiation, QOL was scored higher by 0.06 (95% CI, 0.04-0.08) and comfort scored higher by 0.3 (95% CI, 0-0.06), while the importance score for life extension decreased by 0.07 (95% CI, 0.04-0.09) and disease modification by 0.02 (95% CI, 0-0.04); health scores did not significantly differ from PPC initiation.

Conclusions and Relevance

Parents of children receiving PPC placed the highest value on QOL, but with considerable individual-level variation and substantial change over time. These findings emphasize the importance of reassessing GOCs with parents to guide appropriate clinical intervention.

Video tools in pediatric goals of care communication: A systematic review

•Goals of Care resources are primarily in written format and for adult patients.•Video tools can support families of pediatric patients facing prognostic uncertainty.•Videos represent an effective but underutilized Goals of Care communication tool.