Acute kidney injury in the perioperative period and in intensive care units (excluding renal replacement therapies)

Incidence of acute kidney injury post cardiac surgery: a comparison of the AKIN and KDIGO criteria

Background and objectives

Data on urine output have not been routinely presented to define cardiac surgery-related acute kidney injury (AKI). We evaluated the incidence of AKI after cardiac surgery based on the AKIN and KDIGO criteria (considering serum creatinine concentration and urine output in the first 72 hours postoperatively) and compared the performance of the 2 criteria for AKI staging.

Methods

This was a prospective cohort study of adult patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), valve replacement, or CABG + valve replacement between October 2017 and April 2018 at a single institution. Patients were excluded if baseline creatinine concentration (measured within 7 days before surgery) was ≥ 2.5 mg.dL^-1. Patients were evaluated for the development of AKI based on changes in urine output and serum creatinine concentration, measured daily from postoperative day 1 to 7, according to the AKIN and KDIGO criteria, which were then compared.

Results

A total of 198 patients were included. AKI occurred in 83.8% by AKIN and in 82.8% by KDIGO, when using both urine output and serum creatinine concentration as defining criteria. Using serum creatinine concentration alone, the incidence of AKI fell to 27.3% by AKIN and to 24.7% by KDIGO. A kappa coefficient of 0.98 was obtained between the AKIN and KDIGO criteria.

Conclusions

Almost perfect agreement was found between AKIN and KDIGO. AKI may be underdiagnosed after cardiac surgery if serum creatinine concentration is used as the only defining criterion. Our findings underscore the fundamental importance of using the urine output criterion in the assessment of patients at risk for AKI.

Guidelines for the acute care of severe limb trauma patients

GOAL

To provide healthcare professionals with comprehensive multidisciplinary expert recommendations for the acute care of severe limb trauma patients, both during the prehospital phase and after admission to a Trauma Centre.

DESIGN

A consensus committee of 21 experts was formed. A formal conflict-of-interest (COI) policy was developed at the onset of the process and enforced throughout. The entire guidelines process was conducted independently of any industrial funding (i.e., pharmaceutical, medical devices). The authors were advised to follow the rules of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE®) system to guide assessment of the quality of evidence. The potential drawbacks of making strong recommendations in the presence of low-quality evidence were emphasised. Few recommendations remained non-graded.

METHODS

The committee addressed eleven questions relevant to the patient suffering severe limb trauma: 1) What are the key findings derived from medical history and clinical examination which lead to the patient's prompt referral to a Level 1 or Level 2 Trauma Centre? 2) What are the medical devices that must be implemented in the prehospital setting to reduce blood loss? 3) Which are the clinical findings prompting the performance of injected X-ray examinations? 4) What are the ideal timing and modalities for performing fracture fixation? 5) What are the clinical and operative findings which steer the surgical approach in case of vascular compromise and/or major musculoskeletal attrition? 6) How to best prevent infection? 7) How to best prevent thromboembolic complications? 8) What is the best strategy to precociously detect and treat limb compartment syndrome? 9) How to best and precociously detect post-traumatic rhabdomyolysis and prevent rhabdomyolysis-induced acute kidney injury? 10) What is the best strategy to reduce the incidence of fat emboli syndrome and post-traumatic systemic inflammatory response? 11) What is the best therapeutic strategy to treat acute trauma-induced pain? Every question was formulated in a PICO (Patient Intervention Comparison Outcome) format and the evidence profiles were produced. The literature review and recommendations were made according to the GRADE® methodology.

RESULTS

The experts' synthesis work and the application of the GRADE method resulted in 19 recommendations. Among the formalised recommendations, 4 had a high level of evidence (GRADE 1+/-) and 12 had a low level of evidence (GRADE 2+/-). For 3 recommendations, the GRADE method could not be applied, resulting in an expert advice. After two rounds of scoring and one amendment, strong agreement was reached on all the recommendations.

CONCLUSIONS

There was significant agreement among experts on strong recommendations to improve practices for severe limb trauma patients.

Sodium thiosulfate protects from renal impairement following hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) with Cisplatin

BACKGROUND

Cytoreductive surgery combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) has been shown to provide benefits in the management of peritoneal metastasis. Cisplatin (CDDP) is one of the most frequently used drugs for peritoneal infusion. A major restriction is that CDDP causes renal toxicity and acute renal failure, sometimes leading to chronic renal failure. The aim of the present study was to assess the impact of sodium thiosulfate (ST) in preventing renal impairment (RI) following HIPEC with CDDP.

METHODS

This prospective study assessed the RI rates for all patients who underwent HIPEC with CDDP during two successive periods: without ST (nST Period; from November 2016 to September 2017) and with ST (ST Period; from October 2017 to March 2018). During the ST Period, patients received an ST infusion at 9 mg/m² prior to HIPEC and at 12 mg/m² at the end of the procedure. RI was defined by postoperative serum creatinine >1.6 times elevation of baseline value. The impact of ST treatment was evaluated by comparison of the RI rates between the two periods.

RESULTS

During ST Period, none of 38 patients (0%) developed RI versus 11/35 patients (31.4%) during the nST Period (p < .005); 2 of whom required definitive hemodialysis. Baseline characteristics, background circumstances, indications and laboratory parameters before HIPEC were comparable between the two groups, as well as CDDP dose use during HIPEC.

CONCLUSION

ST appears to be an effective drug for the prevention of the renal toxicity of CDDP used for HIPEC and should be used for all such procedures.

Perioperative hemodynamic optimization: from guidelines to implementation-an experts' opinion paper

Despite a large body of evidence, the implementation of guidelines on hemodynamic optimization and goal-directed therapy remains limited in daily routine practice. To facilitate/accelerate this implementation, a panel of experts in the field proposes an approach based on six relevant questions/answers that are frequently mentioned by clinicians, using a critical appraisal of the literature and a modified Delphi process. The mean arterial pressure is a major determinant of organ perfusion, so that the authors unanimously recommend not to tolerate absolute values below 65 mmHg during surgery to reduce the risk of postoperative organ dysfunction. Despite well-identified limitations, the authors unanimously propose the use of dynamic indices to rationalize fluid therapy in a large number of patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery, pending the implementation of a "validity criteria checklist" before applying volume expansion. The authors recommend with a good agreement mini- or non-invasive stroke volume/cardiac output monitoring in moderate to high-risk surgical patients to optimize fluid therapy on an individual basis and avoid volume overload. The authors propose to use fluids and vasoconstrictors in combination to achieve optimal blood flow and maintain perfusion pressure above the thresholds considered at risk. Although purchase of disposable sensors and stand-alone monitors will result in additional costs, the authors unanimously acknowledge that there are data strongly suggesting this may be counterbalanced by a sustained reduction in postoperative morbidity and hospital lengths of stay. Beside existing guidelines, knowledge and explicit clinical reasoning tools followed by decision algorithms are mandatory to implement individualized hemodynamic optimization strategies and reduce postoperative morbidity and duration of hospital stay in high-risk surgical patients.

Intraoperative hypotension during liver transplant surgery is associated with postoperative acute kidney injury: a historical cohort study

Background

Acute kidney injury (AKI) occurs frequently after liver transplant surgery and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. While the impact of intraoperative hypotension (IOH) on postoperative AKI has been well demonstrated in patients undergoing a wide variety of non-cardiac surgeries, it remains poorly studied in liver transplant surgery. We tested the hypothesis that IOH is associated with AKI following liver transplant surgery.

Methods

This historical cohort study included all patients who underwent liver transplant surgery between 2014 and 2019 except those with a preoperative creatinine > 1.5 mg/dl and/or who had combined transplantation surgery. IOH was defined as any mean arterial pressure (MAP) < 65 mmHg and was classified according to the percentage of case time during which the MAP was < 65 mmHg into three groups, based on the interquartile range of the study cohort: “short” (Quartile 1, < 8.6% of case time), “intermediate” (Quartiles 2–3, 8.6–39.5%) and “long” (Quartile 4, > 39.5%) duration. AKI stages were classified according to a “modified” “Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes” (KDIGO) criteria. Logistic regression modelling was conducted to assess the association between IOH and postoperative AKI. The model was run both as a univariate and with multiple perioperative covariates to test for robustness to confounders.

Results

Of the 205 patients who met our inclusion criteria, 117 (57.1%) developed AKI. Fifty-two (25%), 102 (50%) and 51 (25%) patients had short, intermediate and long duration of IOH respectively. In multivariate analysis, IOH was independently associated with an increased risk of AKI (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.05; 95%CI 1.02–1.09; P < 0.001). Compared to “short duration” of IOH, “intermediate duration” was associated with a 10-fold increased risk of developing AKI (OR 9.7; 95%CI 4.1–22.7; P < 0.001). “Long duration” was associated with an even greater risk of AKI compared to “short duration” (OR 34.6; 95%CI 11.5-108.6; P < 0.001).

Conclusions

Intraoperative hypotension is independently associated with the development of AKI after liver transplant surgery. The longer the MAP is < 65 mmHg, the higher the risk the patient will develop AKI in the immediate postoperative period, and the greater the likely severity. Anesthesiologists and surgeons must therefore make every effort to avoid IOH during surgery.

The concept of peri-operative medicine to prevent major adverse events and improve outcome in surgical patients: A narrative review

: Peri-operative Medicine is the patient-centred and value-based multidisciplinary peri-operative care of surgical patients. Peri-operative stress, that is the collective response to stimuli occurring before, during and after surgery, is, together with pre-existing comorbidities, the pathophysiological basis of major adverse events. The ultimate goal of Peri-operative Medicine is to promote high quality recovery after surgery. Clinical scores and/or biomarkers should be used to identify patients at high risk of developing major adverse events throughout the peri-operative period. Allocation of high-risk patients to specific care pathways with peri-operative organ protection, close surveillance and specific early interventions is likely to improve patient-relevant outcomes, such as disability, health-related quality of life and mortality.

Optimizing continuous renal replacement therapy in the ICU: a team strategy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The consideration of acute kidney injury, its incidence and its impact on the outcome of patients has grown continuously in recent years, leading to an increase in the use of renal replacement therapy (RRT) techniques. However, the successful conduct of RRT depends on the effectiveness of the entire team, doctors and nurses. It is therefore important to know the essential elements to be implemented in the ICU to ensure optimal RRT.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent studies show that the successful conduct of a RRT session requires a good knowledge of the principles of the technique, regular basic training, identification of experts, drafting clear and well followed protocols and good communication between the various stakeholders. In addition, the use of the latest advances, such as regional citrate anticoagulation, allows further optimization of therapy, only if, again, both physicians and nurses are properly trained and highly involved.

SUMMARY

We now have a better understanding of the measures to be deployed to optimize RRT. Organization, training, evaluation and protocols are the key points of the team's efficiency for a safe and effective implementation of RRT.

Optimization of the treatment with beta-lactam antibiotics in critically ill patients-guidelines from the French Society of Pharmacology and Therapeutics (Société Française de Pharmacologie et Thérapeutique-SFPT) and the French Society of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine (Société Française d'Anesthésie et Réanimation-SFAR)

BACKGROUND

Beta-lactam antibiotics (βLA) are the most commonly used antibiotics in the intensive care unit (ICU). ICU patients present many pathophysiological features that cause pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) specificities, leading to the risk of underdosage. The French Society of Pharmacology and Therapeutics (SFPT) and the French Society of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine (SFAR) have joined forces to provide guidelines on the optimization of beta-lactam treatment in ICU patients.

METHODS

A consensus committee of 18 experts from the two societies had the mission of producing these guidelines. The entire process was conducted independently of any industry funding. A list of questions formulated according to the PICO model (Population, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcomes) was drawn-up by the experts. Then, two bibliographic experts analysed the literature published since January 2000 using predefined keywords according to PRISMA recommendations. The quality of the data identified from the literature was assessed using the GRADE® methodology. Due to the lack of powerful studies having used mortality as main judgement criteria, it was decided, before drafting the recommendations, to formulate only "optional" recommendations.

RESULTS

After two rounds of rating and one amendment, a strong agreement was reached by the SFPT-SFAR guideline panel for 21 optional recommendations and a recapitulative algorithm for care covering four areas: (i) pharmacokinetic variability, (ii) PK-PD relationship, (iii) administration modalities, and (iv) therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). The most important recommendations regarding βLA administration in ICU patients concerned (i) the consideration of the many sources of PK variability in this population; (ii) the definition of free plasma concentration between four and eight times the Minimal Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) of the causative bacteria for 100% of the dosing interval as PK-PD target to maximize bacteriological and clinical responses; (iii) the use of continuous or prolonged administration of βLA in the most severe patients, in case of high MIC bacteria and in case of lower respiratory tract infection to improve clinical cure; and (iv) the use of TDM to improve PK-PD target achievement.

CONCLUSIONS

The experts strongly suggest the use of personalized dosing, continuous or prolonged infusion and therapeutic drug monitoring when administering βLA in critically ill patients.

Oliguria in critically ill patients: a narrative review

Oliguria is often observed in critically ill patients. However, different thresholds in urine output (UO) have raised discussion as to the clinical importance of a transiently reduced UO of less than 0.5 ml/kg/h lasting for at least 6 h. While some studies have demonstrated that isolated oliguria without a concomitant increase in serum creatinine is associated with higher mortality rates, different underlying pathophysiological mechanisms suggest varied clinical importance of reduced UO, as some episodes of oliguria may be fully reversible. We aim to explore the clinical relevance of oliguria in critically ill patients and propose a clinical pathway for the diagnostic and therapeutic management of an oliguric, critically ill patient.

[Prevention of acute kidney injury in critically ill patients : Recommendations from the renal section of the DGIIN, ÖGIAIN and DIVI]

BACKGROUND

Acute kidney injury (AKI) has both high mortality and morbidity.

OBJECTIVES

To prevent the occurrence of AKI, current recommendations from the renal section of the DGIIN (Deutschen Gesellschaft für Internistische Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin), ÖGIAIN (Österreichischen Gesellschaft für Internistische und Allgemeine Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin) and DIVI (Deutschen Interdisziplinären Vereinigung für Intensiv- und Notfallmedizin) are stated.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The recommendations stated in this paper are based on the current Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) guidelines, the published statements of the "Working Group on Prevention, AKI section of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine" and the expert knowledge and clinical experience of the authors.

RESULTS

Currently there are no approved clinically effective drugs for the prevention of AKI. Therefore the mainstay of prevention is the optimization of renal perfusion by improving the mean arterial pressure (>65 mm Hg, higher target may be considered in hypertensive patients). This can be done by vasopressors, preferably norepinephrine and achieving or maintaining euvolemia. Hyperhydration that can lead to AKI itself should be avoided. In patients with maintained diuresis this can be done by diuretics that are per se no preventive drug for AKI. Radiocontrast enhanced imaging should not be withheld from patients at risk for AKI; if indicated, however, the contrast media should be limited to the smallest possible volume.

Perioperative management of adult diabetic patients. Preoperative period

In diabetic patients undergoing surgery, we recommend assessing glycaemic control preoperatively by assessing glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) levels and recent capillary blood sugar (glucose) levels, and to adjust any treatments accordingly before surgery, paying particular attention to specific complications of diabetes. Gastroparesis creates a risk of stasis and aspiration of gastric content at induction of anaesthesia requiring the use of a rapid sequence induction technique. Cardiac involvement can be divided into several types. Coronary disease is characterised by silent myocardial ischaemia, present in 30-50% of T2D patients. Diabetic cardiomyopathy is a real cause of heart failure. Finally, cardiac autonomic neuropathy (CAN), although rarely symptomatic, should be investigated because it causes an increased risk of cardiovascular events and a risk of sudden death. Several signs are suggestive of CAN, and confirmation calls for close perioperative surveillance. Chronic diabetic kidney disease (diabetic nephropathy) aggravates the risk of perioperative acute renal failure, and we recommend measurement of the glomerular filtration rate preoperatively. The final step of the consultation concerns the management of antidiabetic therapy. Preoperative glucose infusion is not necessary if the patient is not receiving insulin. Non-insulin drugs are not administered on the morning of the intervention except for metformin, which is not administered from the evening before. The insulins are injected at the usual dose the evening before. The insulin pump is maintained until the patient arrives in the surgical unit. It should be remembered that insulin deficiency in a T1D patient leads to ketoacidosis within a few hours.

New markers for early detection of acute kidney injury after transcatheter aortic valve implantation

BACKGROUND

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a frequent complication after a transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Biomarkers such as urinary G1 cell cycle arrest proteins (TIMP-2 and IGFBP7) and sonographic evaluation (Doppler Renal Resistive Index [RRI]) have been advocated to predict AKI at an early stage after a TAVI-procedure. The primary aim was to determine the predictive value of these markers to detect AKI after a TAVI-procedure at an early phase.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In a prospective observational study, 62 consecutive patients were scheduled for a TAVI. AKI was assessed based on the KDIGO criteria. Biomarkers and RRI were measured concomitantly before TAVI, at the first micturition post-implantation and the first micturition on the morning after the procedure.

RESULTS

Twenty-two patients (35%) developed AKI. On the first day after the TAVI-procedure, urinary TIMP-2 and IGFBP7 concentrations increased significantly in patients who developed AKI (0.1, [interquartile] [0.1-0.35] to 0.40 [0.10-1.00] vs. 0.2 [0.1-0.5] to 0.10 [0.10-0.20], P=0.012) with an area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve of 0.71 [0.55-0.83]. Sensitivity was 0.57 and specificity was 0.83 for a cut-off value of 0.35. No significant increases in RRI were found in patients who developed AKI.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the current guidelines for the diagnosis of AKI, the urinary proteins TIMP-2 and IGFBP7 do not detect AKI at an early stage accurately in patients undergoing a TAVI-procedure.

Can Renal Resistive Index Predict Acute Kidney Injury After Acute Type A Aortic Dissection Repair?

BACKGROUND

This study sought to determine whether assessment of the renal resistive index (RRI) can predict the short-term reversibility of acute kidney injury (AKI) after repair of acute type A aortic dissection (TAAD).

METHODS

This prospective study included 62 patients undergoing repair of acute TAAD. Doppler-based RRIs were obtained preoperatively, immediately after the surgical procedure, and 6, 24, and 48 hours postoperatively. The occurrence of AKI was evaluated daily according to Acute Kidney Injury Network criteria. Persistent AKI was defined as AKI lasting longer than 3 days. The association between the maximum RRI level at different time points and persistent AKI was analyzed by the receiver-operating characteristic curve.

RESULTS

Of the 62 patients, 22 (35.5%) had no AKI, 21 (33.9%) had transient AKI, and 19 (30.6%) had persistent AKI. The maximum RRI was 0.67 ± 0.03 (0.62 to 0.71), 0.71 ± 0.05 (0.59 to 0.79), and 0.78 ± 0.05 (0.70 to 0.92) in the no AKI, transient AKI, and persistent AKI groups, respectively. The maximum level of RRI was significantly correlated with that of SCr during the first 48 hours postoperatively (rho = 0.606; p < 0.001). RRI could predict persistent AKI with an area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve of 0.918 (95% confidence interval, 0.850 to 0.986; p < 0.001). A postoperative RRI of 0.725 or higher was a marker for early detection of persistent AKI with high sensitivity and specificity (94.7% and 72.1%, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

An elevated maximum RRI may be a predictor of persistent AKI after repair of acute TAAD. This is helpful for management decision making and improving the prognosis of patients with AKI.

Risk factors for acute kidney injury in critically ill patients with complicated intra-abdominal infection

PURPOSE

The aim was to determine the factors related to acute kidney injury (AKI) in surgical septic patients with complicated intra-abdominal infection (CIAI) and mortality associated to AKI.

METHODS

An observational study was performed in patients with CIAI requiring surgery and ICU admission (June 2011-June 2013). Factors at admission associated with developing of AKI and renal replacement therapy (RRT) and association between mortality and AKI and RRT were studied.

RESULTS

A total of 114 patients were included. Developing of AKI was independently associated with the sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score (odds ratio [OR], 1.570; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.286-2.016) and creatinine at admission (OR for 0.1 units, 1.560; 95% CI, 1.296-1.990). Renal replacement therapy was independently associated with arterial hypertension (OR, 4.896; 95% CI, 1.501-15.971) and SOFA (OR, 1.713; 95% CI, 1.377-2.132). In another model with more predictive capacity, the number of previous medications that may alter renal function (OR, 3.732; 95% CI, 1.923-8.383) and SOFA (OR, 1.860; 95% CI, 1.469-2.541) were related to RRT. Both AKI and RRT were related to intensive care unit (P=.014 and P<.001, respectively) and 28-day mortality (P=.045 and P<.001, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Acute kidney injury in patients with CIAI is clearly associated with SOFA and creatinine at admission. Severe AKI with RRT need is highly associated with both previous arterial hypertension and the number of previous medications potentially affecting renal function.