Are we correctly treating invasive candidiasis under continuous renal replacement therapy with echinocandins? Preliminary in vitro assessment

Caspofungin sequestration in a polyacrylonitrile-derived filter: Increasing the dose does not mitigate sequestration

OBJECTIVES

Critically ill patients frequently require continuous renal replacement therapy. Echinocandins are recommended as first-line treatment of candidemia. Preliminary results suggested echinocandin sequestration in a polyacrylonitrile filter. The present study aimed to determine whether increasing the dose might balance sequestration.

METHODS

An STX filter (Baxter-Gambro) was used. A liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry method was used for dosage of caspofungin. In vitro drug disposition was evaluated by NeckEpur (Neckepur, Versailles, France) technology using a crystalloid medium instead of diluted/reconstituted blood, focusing on the disposition of the unbound fraction of drugs. Two concentrations were assessed.

RESULTS

At the low dose, the mean measured initial concentration in the central compartment (CC) was 5.1 ± 0.6 mg/L. One hundred percent of the initial amount was eliminated from the CC within the 6-h session. The mean total clearance from the CC was 9.6 ± 2.5 L/h. The mean percentages of elimination resulting from sequestration and diafiltration were 96.0 ± 5.0 and 4.0 ± 5.2%, respectively. At high dose, the mean measured initial concentration in the CC was 13.1 mg/L. One hundred percent of the initial amount was eliminated from the CC within the 6-h session. The mean total clearance from the CC was 9.5 L/h. The mean percentages of elimination resulting from sequestration and filtration were 88.5% and 11.5%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Increasing the dose does not mitigate caspofungin sequestration in the STX filter. The results raise caution about the simultaneous use of caspofungin and polyacrylonitrile-derived filters. Intermittent modes of renal replacement therapy might be considered. For sensitive species, fluconazole might be an alternative.

Elimination of cefotaxime using polysulfone and polyacrylonitrile-derived filters: An in vitro assessment

Continuous renal replacement therapy (CCRT) efficiently eliminates cefotaxime. To our knowledge, there are no previous in vitro studies dealing with the disposition of cefotaxime. We studied the elimination of cefotaxime by two filters in a model mimicking a session of CRRT using the NeckEpur^® technology. The ST150^®-polyacrylonitrile filter with the Prismaflex, Baxter-Gambro, and the AV1000^®-polysulfone filter with the Multifiltrate Pro, Fresenius, were studied. Continuous filtration used a flowrate of 1 L/h in post-dilution only. Simulated blood flowrate was set at 200 mL/min. Routes of elimination were assessed using the NeckEpur^® technology. Cefotaxime concentrations were measured using ultra high-performance liquid chromatography, and tandem mass spectrometry. Two sessions were performed using the ST^® filter and three using the AV^® filter. Stability of cefotaxime during 6 h was assessed in triplicate with a mean variation of concentrations of 2.4 ± 1.5% at the end of the study. The mean measured initial concentration in the central compartment (CC) for the five sessions was 52.4 mg/L. The mean amount eliminated from the CC at the end of the sessions using the ST150^®-polyacrylonitrile and the AV1000^®-polysulfone filters were 72% and 73%, respectively. The clearances of cefotaxime from the central compartment (CC) were 1.1 and 1.2 L/h, respectively. The mean sieving coefficient were 0.99 and 0.99, respectively. The mean percentages of the amount eliminated from the CC by filtration/adsorption were 87/13% and 92/8%, respectively. Both adsorption percentages were below 15%. We conclude neither the ST150^®-polyacrylonitrile nor the AV1000^®-polysulfone filters result in clinically significant adsorption of cefotaxime.

Elimination of three doses of gentamicin over three consecutive days using a polyacrylonitrile-derived filter: An in vitro assessment

INTRODUCTION

Adsorption of gentamicin in a polyacrylonitrile filter was previously evidenced in a session lasting 6 h using the NeckEpur model. We extended the study over three consecutive days to mimic the 72-h life span of a filter.

METHODS

Prismaflex^® monitor and ST150^® filter were used in the continuous diafiltration (CDF) mode at a 2.5 L/h flowrate. The daily session started with a 6-h session of CDF. Thereafter, the 5-L central compartment was changed using a bag free of gentamicin to assess gentamicin release over the following 18 h. Experiments were repeated on Day 2 and stopped at the end of the 6-h session of CDF on Day 3. The experiment was performed in duplicate.

RESULTS

At a 2.5 L/h diafiltration flowrate, the mean daily clearances of gentamicin were 5.5, 4.0, and 3.3 L/h, respectively. The mean diafiltration and adsorption ratios in the daily elimination of gentamicin were 32/68%, 58/42%, and 88/12%, respectively. During days 1 and 2, the mean amount of gentamicin released from the ST150^® filter were 14 and 34 mg, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The pharmacokinetics of gentamicin over 3 days is strongly altered by adsorption in the same filter with a progressive decrease of elimination by adsorption, suggesting saturation of the filter. One limitation of our study results from the mode of administration using a bolus dose instead of an infusion over 30 min. Adsorption adds a clearance to those of diafiltration. The time-dependency of gentamicin clearance precludes using a constant dosage regimen over the filter's life span.

Elimination of fluconazole during continuous renal replacement therapy. An in vitro assessment

Introduction:

Continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) efficiently eliminates fluconazole. However, the routes of elimination were not clarified. Adsorption of fluconazole by filters is a pending question. We studied the elimination of fluconazole in a model mimicking a session of CRRT in humans using the NeckEpur® model. Two filters were studied.

Methods:

The AV1000®-polysulfone filter with the Multifiltrate Pro. Fresenius and the ST150®-polyacrylonitrile filter with the Prismaflex. Baxter-Gambro were studied. Continuous filtration used a flowrate of 2.5 L/h in post-dilution only. Session were made in duplicate. Routes of elimination were assessed using the NeckEpur® model.

Results:

The mean measured initial fluconazole concentration (mean ± SD) for the four sessions in the central compartment (CC) was 14.9 ± 0.2 mg/L. The amount eliminated from the CC at the end of 6 h-session at a 2.5 L/h filtration flowrate for the AV1000®-polysulfone and the ST150®-polyacrylonitrile filters were 90%–93% and 96%–94%, respectively; the clearances from the central compartment (CC) were 2.5–2.6 and 2.4–2.3 L/h, respectively. The means of the instantaneous sieving coefficient were 0.94%–0.91% and 0.99%–0.91%, respectively. The percentages of the amount eliminated from the CC by filtration/adsorption were 100/0%–95/5% and 100/0%–100/0%, respectively.

Conclusion:

Neither the ST150®-polyacrylonitrile nor the AV1000®-polysulfone filters result in any significant adsorption of fluconazole.

Diafiltration flowrate is a determinant of the extent of adsorption of amikacin in renal replacement therapy using the ST150®-AN69 filter: An in vitro study

Introduction:

In continuous renal replacement therapy, conduction and convection are controlled allowing prescribing dosage regimen improving survival. In contrast, adsorption is an uncontrolled property altering drug disposition. Whether adsorption depends on flowrates is unknown. We hypothesized an in vitro model may provide information in conditions mimicking continuous renal replacement therapy in humans.

Methods:

ST150®-AN69 filter and Prismaflex dialyzer, Baxter-Gambro were used. Simulated blood flowrate was set at 200 mL/min. The flowrates in the filtration (continuous filtration), dialysis (continuous dialysis), and diafiltration (continuous diafiltration) were 1500, 2500, and 4000 mL/h, respectively. Routes of elimination were assessed using NeckEpur® analysis.

Results:

The percentages of the total amount eliminated by continuous filtration, continuous dialysis, and continuous diafiltration were 82%, 86%, and 94%, respectively. Elimination by effluents and adsorption accounted for 42% ± 7% and 58% ± 5%, 57% ± 7% and 43% ± 6%, and 84% ± 6% and 16% ± 6% of amikacin elimination, respectively. There was a linear regression between flowrates and amikacin clearance: Y = 0.6 X ± 1.7 (R2 = 0.9782). Conversely, there was a linear inverse correlation between the magnitude of amikacin adsorption and flowrate: Y = –16.9 X ± 84.1 (R2 = 0.9976).

Conclusion:

Low flowrates resulted in predominant elimination by adsorption, accounting for 58% of the elimination of amikacin from the central compartment in the continuous filtration mode at 1500 mL/h of flowrate. Thereafter, the greater the flowrate, the lower the adsorption of amikacin in a linear manner. Flowrate is a major determinant of adsorption of amikacin. There was an about 17% decrease in the rate of adsorption per increase in the flowrate of 1 L/min.