Comparison of coronary artery calcium screening image quality between C-150 and e-Speed electron beam scanners

Accuracy in quantification of coronary calcification with CT: a cork-dog heart phantom study

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

Coronary artery calcium is a sensitive risk predictor of cardiac events. However, measurement of calcium foci is affected by partial-volume effects, which ultimately have an effect on accuracy and reproducibility of calcium scores. In this study, we describe the accuracy of quantification of calcium foci of known size and density using cork-dog heart phantoms.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Five study phantoms were constructed from cork chests and dog hearts containing 135 calcium hydroxyapatite (CaHA) foci of known volume, mass, and concentration located in the coronary arteries or the myocardium. Hearts were separated into two groups: (1) three hearts containing large, high-density foci and (2) two hearts containing small, low-density foci. The phantoms were scanned using a standard coronary artery calcium (CAC) protocol and the volume and mean intensity of foci were measured.

RESULTS

In group 1, the total volume of 87 CaHA foci measured was 4284 and 3779 mm(3) with electron beam computed tomography (EBCT); multidetector computed tomography (MDCT), respectively (P < .001). Both were significantly larger than the true volume (2713.9 mm(3), P < .001). In Group 2, the total volume of 57 CaHA foci measured was 592.6 and 702.9 mm(3) with EBT and MDCT, respectively (P < .001). Both were significantly smaller than the true volume (1733.2 mm(3), P < .001). We found that EBCT values for volume were approximately generally higher than MDCT values, but strongly correlated (r = 0.95, P < .0001). Agatston scores were found to be nearly equivalent between EBCT and MDCT and were similarly strongly correlated (r = 0.97, P < .0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Computed tomography images overestimate the volume of large, dense CaHA foci while underestimating the volume of smaller (<6.6 mm(3)), less dense foci. This may have significant implications on CAC scoring and volume measurement. EBCT overestimated calcium more than MDCT, most likely from increased image noise.

Influence of heart rate on the detectability and reproducibility of multislice computed tomography for measuring coronary calcium score using a pulsating calcified mock-vessel in comparison with electron beam tomography

BACKGROUND

The influence of heart rate on detectability and reproducibility of multislice computed tomography (MSCT) for measuring coronary calcium score was evaluated using pulsating calcified mock-vessels and compared with electron beam tomography (EBT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Four calcified mock-vessels with 200-350 HU were made to pulsate at a rate of 40-80 beat/min. Retrospective ECG-gating MSCT (Light Speed Ultra 16) scanning with 0.625 mm slice-thickness was performed twice at each pulsation rate. For comparison, EBT (Imatron C150 XP) was performed with 3 and 1.5 mm beam collimation with prospective ECG-gating and calcium scores were measured.

RESULTS

The comparison revealed that MSCT did not have better reproducibility than EBT, but the calcium scores with MSCT were less influenced by pulsation rates than those with EBT. Especially in mild calcification, the calcium scores decreased with EBT with 3 mm beam collimation with increasing pulsation rate, but the scores were stable in any rate with MSCT.

CONCLUSION

MSCT effectively detects coronary calcification, especially mild calcification, without being influenced by heart rate. This is accomplished by reducing the partial volume effect in the through plane using sub millimeter slice thickness, and using appropriate reconstruction methods, which improve temporal resolution.