Phase-sensitive inversion recovery single-shot balanced steady-state free precession for detection of myocardial infarction during a single breathhold

Parametric mapping using cardiovascular magnetic resonance for the differentiation of light chain amyloidosis and transthyretin-related amyloidosis

AIMS

To evaluate different cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) parameters for the differentiation of light chain amyloidosis (AL) and transthyretin-related amyloidosis (ATTR).

METHODS AND RESULTS

In total, 75 patients, 53 with cardiac amyloidosis {20 patients with AL [66 ± 12 years, 14 males (70%)] and 33 patients with ATTR [78 ± 5 years, 28 males (88%)]} were retrospectively analysed regarding CMR parameters such as T1 and T2 mapping, extracellular volume (ECV), late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) distribution patterns, and myocardial strain, and compared to a control cohort with other causes of left ventricular hypertrophy {LVH; 22 patients [53 ± 16 years, 17 males (85%)]}. One-way ANOVA and receiver operating characteristic analysis were used for statistical analysis. ECV was the single best parameter to differentiate between cardiac amyloidosis and controls [area under the curve (AUC): 0.97, 95% confidence intervals (CI): 0.89-0.99, P < 0.0001, cut-off: >30%]. T2 mapping was the best single parameter to differentiate between AL and ATTR amyloidosis (AL: 63 ± 4 ms, ATTR: 58 ± 2 ms, P < 0.001, AUC: 0.86, 95% CI: 0.74-0.94, cut-off: >61 ms). Subendocardial LGE was predominantly observed in AL patients (10/20 [50%] vs. 5/33 [15%]; P = 0.002). Transmural LGE was predominantly observed in ATTR patients (23/33 [70%] vs. 2/20 [10%]; P < 0.001). The diagnostic performance of T2 mapping to differentiate between AL and ATTR amyloidosis was further increased with the inclusion of LGE patterns [AUC: 0.96, 95% CI: (0.86-0.99); P = 0.05].

CONCLUSION

ECV differentiates cardiac amyloidosis from other causes of LVH. T2 mapping combined with LGE differentiates AL from ATTR amyloidosis with high accuracy on a patient level.

Diagnostic and prognostic role of late gadolinium enhancement in cardiomyopathies

Late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) is the most relevant tool of cardiac magnetic resonance for tissue characterization, and it plays a pivotal role for diagnostic and prognostic assessment of cardiomyopathies. The pattern of presentation of LGE allows differential diagnosis between ischaemic and non-ischaemic heart disease with high diagnostic accuracy, and among different cardiomyopathies, specific presentation of LGE may help to make a diagnosis. Late gadolinium enhancement may be caused by conditions that significantly increase the interstitial space or, less frequently, that slow down Gd exit, like myocardial fibrosis. In chronic myocardial infarction, hypertrophic cardiomyopathies (HCM), dilated cardiomyopathy, Fabry disease, and other conditions, LGE is a marker of myocardial fibrosis, but also in patients with acute myocarditis where LGE may be also explained by the increase of interstitial space caused by interstitial oedema or by tissue infiltration of inflammatory cells. In cardiac amyloidosis, LGE represents myocardial fibrosis but the interstitial overload of amyloid proteins should also be considered as a potential cause of LGE. The identification of the pattern of presentation of LGE is also very important. In the ischaemic pattern, LGE always involves the subendocardial layer with more or less transmural extent, it is confluent, and every single scar should be located in the territory of one coronary artery. In the non-ischaemic pattern, LGE does not fulfil the previous criteria, being midwall, subepicardial, or mixed, not necessarily confluent or confined to a territory of one coronary artery. For cardiomyopathies, the exact pattern of non-ischaemic LGE is important. Quantitative analysis of LGE is required in some specific conditions as in HCM. Magnetic resonance imaging with LGE technique should be performed in every patient with suspect of cardiomyopathy. The lack of standardization of pulse sequence and mostly of quantification methods is the main limitation of LGE technique.

Role of free-breathing motion-corrected late gadolinium enhancement technique for image quality assessment and LGE quantification

OBJECTIVE

To compare the image quality and late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) quantification between free-breathing motion-corrected and conventional breath-hold LGE method in a variety of cardiovascular diseases.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

149 consecutive patients underwent contrast-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance examination employing both free-breathing motion-corrected LGE and conventional breath-hold LGE method. Scan time, contrast-to-noise ratio, overall image quality score and LGE mass were measured and analyzed statistically.

RESULTS

Free-breathing motion-corrected LGE method had a shorter scan time and higher overall image quality score in comparison with conventional breath-hold LGE method (p < 0.001). Univariate/multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that breath-holding difficulty, high heart rate and arrhythmia could be predictive factors possibly for an inferior image quality score (p < 0.05 for all). The contrast-to-noise ratios of free-breathing motion-corrected LGE images were higher than those of conventional breath-hold LGE images (p < 0.001). In the cases with subepicardial and/or transmural myocardial enhancement, the measured LGE masses were larger on free-breathing motion-corrected LGE images in comparison with those on conventional breath-hold LGE images (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Free-breathing motion-corrected LGE could be a better choice for patients who need contrast-enhanced cardiac MRI and have one or more of the risk factors for an inferior image quality score, including breath-holding difficulty, high heart rate and arrhythmia. However, an overestimation of LGE mass on free-breathing motion-corrected LGE image should be taken into consideration when LGE pattern involves subepicardial and/or transmural myocardium.

Twofold improved tumor-to-brain contrast using a novel T1 relaxation-enhanced steady-state (T1RESS) MRI technique

A technique that provides more accurate cancer detection would be of great value. Toward this end, we developed T1 relaxation-enhanced steady-state (T₁RESS), a novel magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) pulse sequence that enables the flexible modulation of T1 weighting and provides the unique feature that intravascular signals can be toggled on and off in contrast-enhanced scans. T₁RESS makes it possible to effectively use an MRI technique with improved signal-to-noise ratio efficiency for cancer imaging. In a proof-of-concept study, "dark blood" unbalanced T₁RESS provided a twofold improvement in tumor-to-brain contrast compared with standard techniques, whereas balanced T₁RESS greatly enhanced vascular detail. In conclusion, T₁RESS represents a new MRI technique with substantial potential value for cancer imaging, along with a broad range of other clinical applications.

Motion-corrected free-breathing LGE delivers high quality imaging and reduces scan time by half: an independent validation study

Late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) sequences have evolved. Free-breathing motion-corrected (MOCO) LGE has potential advantages over breath-held (bh) LGE including minimal user input for the short axis (SAX) stack without breath-holds. It has previously been shown that MOCO-LGE delivers high image quality compared to bh-LGE. We sought to conduct an independent validation study to investigate real-world performance of bh-LGE versus MOCO-LGE in a high-throughput CMR center immediately after the introduction of the MOCO-LGE sequence and with elementary staff induction in its use. Four-hundred consecutive patients, referred for CMR and graded by clinical complexity, underwent CMR on either of two scanners (1.5 T, both Siemens) in a UK tertiary cardiac center. Scar imaging was by bh-LGE or MOCO-LGE (both with phase sensitive inversion recovery). Image quality, scan time, reader confidence and report reproducibility were compared between those scanned by bh-LGE versus MOCO-LGE. Readers had > 3 years CMR experience. Categorical variables were compared by χ² or Fisher’s exact tests and continuous variables by unpaired Student’s t-test. Inter-rater agreement of LGE reports was by Cohen’s kappa. Image quality (low score = better) was better for MOCO-LGE (median, interquartile range [Q1–Q3]: 0 [0–0] vs. 2 [0–3], P < 0.0001). This persisted when just clinically complex patients were assessed (0 [0–1] vs. 2 [1–4] P < 0.0001). Readers were more confident in their MOCO-LGE rulings (P < 0.001) and reports more reproducible [bh-LGE vs. MOCO-LGE: kappa 0.76, confidence interval (CI) 0.7–0.9 vs. 0.82, CI 0.7–0.9]. MOCO-LGE significantly shortened LGE acquisition times compared to bh-LGE (for left ventricle SAX stack: 03:22 ± 01:14 vs 06:09 ± 01:47 min respectively, P < 0.0001). In a busy clinical service, immediately after its introduction and with elementary staff training, MOCO-LGE is demonstrably faster to bh-LGE, providing better images that are easier to interpret, even in the sickest of patients.

Ejection fraction in left bundle branch block is disproportionately reduced in relation to amount of myocardial scar

INTRODUCTION

The relationship between left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) and LV myocardial scar can identify potentially reversible causes of LV dysfunction. Left bundle branch block (LBBB) alters the electrical and mechanical activation of the LV. We hypothesized that the relationship between LVEF and scar extent is different in LBBB compared to controls.

METHODS

We compared the relationship between LVEF and scar burden between patients with LBBB and scar (n = 83), and patients with chronic ischemic heart disease and scar but no electrocardiographic conduction abnormality (controls, n = 90), who had undergone cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging at one of three centers. LVEF (%) was measured in CMR cine images. Scar burden was quantified by CMR late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) and expressed as % of LV mass (%LVM). Maximum possible LVEF (LVEFmax) was defined as the function describing the hypotenuse in the LVEF versus myocardial scar extent scatter plot. Dysfunction index was defined as LVEFmax derived from the control cohort minus the measured LVEF.

RESULTS

Compared to controls with scar, LBBB with scar had a lower LVEF (median [interquartile range] 27 [19-38] vs 36 [25-50] %, p < 0.001), smaller scar (4 [1-9] vs 11 [6-20] %LVM, p < 0.001), and greater dysfunction index (39 [30-52] vs 21 [12-35] % points, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Among LBBB patients referred for CMR, LVEF is disproportionately reduced in relation to the amount of scar. Dyssynchrony in LBBB may thus impair compensation for loss of contractile myocardium.

Myocardial late gadolinium enhancement: a head-to-head comparison of motion-corrected balanced steady-state free precession with segmented turbo fast low angle shot

AIM

To evaluate the image quality and diagnostic agreement with a head-to-head comparison of late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) images acquired by the motion-corrected (MOCO) balanced steady-state free precession (bSSFP) phase sensitivity inversion recovery (PSIR) and conventional segmented fast low angle shot (FLASH) PSIR methods^15,16 in a patient cohort with a wide spectrum of cardiovascular disease.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In 59 consecutive patients, signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs), contrast-to-noise ratios (CNRs) of the normal myocardium (NM), LGE, and blood pool (BP) were pair-wise compared between the two different sequences. A further semi-qualitative score system (graded 1 -4) was used to compare the overall image quality (OIQ). The diagnostic agreement of the two techniques were evaluated by both transmural severity and absolutely quantitative size of LGE.

RESULTS

The SNRs of the NM, LGE, and BP of MOCO bSSFP were 4.8±3.4, 53.6±35.6 and 43.2±29.3, compared with 3.9±3.6 (p=0.126), 27.7±18.5 (p<0.001) and 24.3±13.4 (p<0.001) of FLASH LGE, respectively. The CNRs of LGE to NM, LGE to BP, and BP to NM were 48.3±33.1 versus 23.8±16.7 (p<0.001), 6.5±21.6 versus 3.8±10.8 (p<0.001), and 38.3±27.2 versus 20.3±10.7 (p=0.448), respectively. The OIQ of MOCO bSSFP was higher than that of segmented FLASH (median 4 versus median 3, p<0.001). For quantification of LGE size, there is good agreement and high correlation (r=0.992, p<0.001) between the two methods.

CONCLUSIONS

MOCO bSSFP is a feasible, robust sequence for LGE imaging, especially for patients with arrhythmia and those incapable of breath-holding due to severe heart failure.

Cardiac MRI: a Translational Imaging Tool for Characterizing Anthracycline-Induced Myocardial Remodeling

Cardiovascular side effects of cancer therapeutics are the leading causes of morbidity and mortality in cancer survivors. Anthracyclines (AC) serve as the backbone of many anti-cancer treatment strategies, but dose-dependent myocardial injury limits their use. Cumulative AC exposure can disrupt the dynamic equilibrium of the myocardial microarchitecture while repeated injury and repair leads to myocyte loss, interstitial myocardial fibrosis, and impaired contractility. Although children are assumed to have greater myocardial plasticity, AC exposure at a younger age portends worse prognosis. In older patients, there is lower overall survival once they develop cardiovascular disease. Because aberrations in the myocardial architecture predispose the heart to a decline in function, early detection with sensitive imaging tools is crucial and the implications for resource utilization are substantial. As a comprehensive imaging modality, cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging is able to go beyond quantification of ejection fraction and myocardial deformation to characterize adaptive microstructural and microvascular changes that are important to myocardial tissue health. Herein, we describe CMR as an established translational imaging tool that can be used clinically to characterize AC-associated myocardial remodeling.

Influence of phase correction of late gadolinium enhancement images on scar signal quantification in patients with ischemic and non-ischemic cardiomyopathy

BACKGROUND

Myocardial fibrosis imaging using late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) has been validated as a quantitative predictive marker for response to medical, surgical, and device therapy. To date, all such studies have examined conventional, non-phase corrected magnitude images.  However, contemporary practice has rapdily adopted phase-corrected image reconstruction. We sought to investigate the existence of any systematic bias between threshold-based scar quantification performed on conventional magnitude inversion recovery (MIR) and matched phase sensitive inversion recovery (PSIR) images.

METHODS

In 80 patients with confirmed ischemic (N = 40), or non-ischemic (n = 40) myocardial fibrosis, and also in a healthy control cohort (N = 40) without fibrosis, myocardial late enhancement was quantified using a Signal Threshold Versus Reference Myocardium technique (STRM) at ≥2, ≥3, and ≥5 SD threshold, and also using the Full Width at Half Maximal (FWHM) technique. This was performed on both MIR and PSIR images and values compared using linear regression and Bland-Altman analyses.

RESULTS

Linear regression analysis demonstrated excellent correlation for scar volumes between MIR and PSIR images at all three STRM signal thresholds for the ischemic (N = 40, r = 0.96, 0.95, 0.88 at 2, 3, and 5 SD, p < 0.0001 for all regressions), and non ischemic (N = 40, r = 0.86, 0.89, 0.90 at 2, 3, and 5 SD, p < 0.0001 for all regressions) cohorts. FWHM analysis demonstrated good correlation in the ischemic population (N = 40, r = 0.83, p < 0.0001). Bland-Altman analysis demonstrated a systematic bias with MIR images showing higher values than PSIR for ischemic (3.3 %, 3.9 % and 4.9 % at 2, 3, and 5 SD, respectively), and non-ischemic (9.7 %, 7.4 % and 4.1 % at ≥2, ≥3, and ≥5 SD thresholds, respectively) cohorts. Background myocardial signal measured in the control population demonstrated a similar bias of 4.4 %, 2.6 % and 0.7 % of the LV volume at 2, 3 and 5 SD thresholds, respectively. The bias observed using FWHM analysis was -6.9 %.

CONCLUSIONS

Scar quantification using phase corrected (PSIR) images achieves values highly correlated to those obtained on non-corrected (MIR) images. However, a systematic bias exists that appears exaggerated in non-ischemic cohorts. Such bias should be considered when comparing or translating knowledge between MIR- and PSIR-based imaging.

Optimization and comparison of myocardial T1 techniques at 3T in patients with aortic stenosis

Aims

To determine the optimal T1 mapping approach to assess myocardial fibrosis at 3T.

Methods and results

T1 mapping was performed at 3T using the modified look-locker-inversion sequence in 20 healthy volunteers and 20 patients with aortic stenosis (AS). Pre- and post-contrast myocardial T1, the partition coefficient (λ; ΔR_myocardium/ΔR_blood, where ΔR = 1/post-contrast T1 − 1/pre-contrast T1), and extracellular volume fraction [ECV; λ (1 − haematocrit)] were assessed. After establishing the optimal time point and myocardial region for analysis, we compared the reproducibility of these T1 measures and their ability to differentiate asymptomatic patients with AS from healthy volunteers. There was no segmental variation across the ventricle in any of the T1 measures evaluated. λ and ECV did not vary with time, while post-contrast T1 was relatively constant between 15 and 30 min. Thus, mid-cavity myocardium at 20 min was used for subsequent analyses. ECV displayed excellent intra-, inter-observer, and scan–rescan reproducibility [intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) 1.00, 0.97, and 0.96, respectively], as did λ (ICC 0.99, 0.94, 0.93, respectively). Moreover, ECV and λ were both higher in patients with AS compared with controls (ECV 28.3 ± 1.7 vs. 26.0 ± 1.6%, P < 0.001; λ 0.46 ± 0.03 vs. 0.44 ± 0.03, P = 0.02), with the former offering improved differentiation. In comparison, scan–rescan reproducibilities for pre- and post-contrast myocardial T1 were only modest (ICC 0.72 and 0.56) with no differences in values observed between cases and controls (both P> 0.05).

Conclusions

ECV appears to be the most promising measure of diffuse myocardial fibrosis at 3T based upon its superior reproducibility and ability to differentiate disease from health.

Cardiac imaging techniques for physicians: late enhancement

Late enhancement imaging is used to diagnose and characterize a wide range of ischemic and nonischemic cardiomyopathies, and its use has become ubiquitous in the cardiac MR exam. As the use of late enhancement imaging has matured and the span of applications has widened, the demands on image quality have grown. The characterization of subendocardial MI now includes the accurate quantification of scar size, shape, and characterization of borders which have been shown to have prognostic significance. More diverse patterns of late enhancement including patchy, mid-wall, subepicardial, or diffuse enhancement are of interest in diagnosing nonischemic cardiomyopathies. As clinicians are examining late enhancement images for more subtle indication of fibrosis, the demand for lower artifacts has increased. A range of new techniques have emerged to improve the speed and quality of late enhancement imaging including: methods for acquisition during free breathing, and fat water separated imaging for characterizing fibrofatty infiltration and reduction of artifacts related to the presence of fat. Methods for quantification of T1 and extracellular volume fraction are emerging to tackle the issue of discriminating globally diffuse fibrosis from normal healthy tissue which is challenging using conventional late enhancement methods. The aim of this review will be to describe the current state of the art and to provide a guide to various clinical protocols that are commonly used.

Differentiation of myocardial scar from potential pitfalls and artefacts in delayed enhancement MRI

Delayed enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance (DE-CMR) imaging is used increasingly to identify and quantify focal myocardial scar. Our objective is to describe factors used in the interpretation of DE-CMR images and to highlight potential pitfalls and artefacts that mimic myocardial scar. Inversion recovery gradient recalled echo sequence is commonly accepted as the standard of reference for DE-CMR. There are also alternative sequences that can be performed in a single breath-hold or with free breathing. Radiologists need to be aware of factors affecting image quality, and potential pitfalls and artefacts that may generate focal hyperintense areas that mimic myocardial scar.

Estimation of gadolinium-induced T1-shortening with measurement of simple signal intensity ratio between the cochlea and brain parenchyma on 3D-FLAIR: correlation with T1 measurement by TI scout sequence

PURPOSE

T(1)-shortening of labyrinthine fluid on 3-dimensional fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (3D-FLAIR) has been reported in many inner ear disorders. Although semi-quantitative assessment by simple signal intensity ratio between cochlear fluid and brain tissue has been tried, its feasibility using a multi-channel phased-array head coil with an inherently inhomogenous sensitivity distribution has not been fully evaluated. We evaluated the feasibility of measuring simple signal intensity ratio by correlating rapid T(1) measurements using an inversion time (TI) scout sequence.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We evaluated 10 patients with Meniere's disease and 4 patients with sudden deafness. Nine of the patients with Meniere's disease received a unilateral intratympanic injection of Gd-DTPA; the tenth patient received bilateral injections. The 4 patients with sudden deafness received a double-dose intravenous injection. Magnetic resonance (MR) images were obtained 24 hours after intratympanic injections and 4 hours after intravenous injections at 3 tesla using a 32-channel head coil. We measured the ratio (CM ratio) between the signal intensity of the perilymph in the cochlea (C) and that of the medulla oblongata (M) and correlated it with the null-point inversion time (TI(null)) obtained with the TI scout sequence. The TI scout consisted of 85 images obtained with TI values between 132.5 and 3087.5 ms at increments of 37.5 ms.

RESULTS

The correlation coefficient between TI(null) and the natural logarithm of the CM ratio was -0.88 (P<0.01). There was significant negative linear correlation.

CONCLUSIONS

Measurement of the simple signal intensity ratio between the cochlea and the medulla can be used for semi-quantitative analysis of 3D-FLAIR. The results of this study may facilitate clinical research of inner-ear disease using 3D-FLAIR.

Three-dimensional phase-sensitive inversion-recovery turbo FLASH sequence for the evaluation of left ventricular myocardial scar

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate a new free-breathing 3D phase-sensitive inversion-recovery (PSIR) turbo FLASH pulse sequence for the detection of left ventricular myocardial scar.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Patients with suspected myocardial scar were examined on a 1.5-T MR scanner for myocardial late enhancement after the administration of gadopentetate dimeglumine using a segmented 2D PSIR turbo FLASH sequence followed by a navigator-gated 3D PSIR turbo FLASH sequence. Image quality was scored by two independent readers using a 4-point Likert scale (0 = poor, nondiagnostic; 1 = fair, diagnostics may be impaired; 2 = good, some artifacts but not interfering in diagnostics; 3 = excellent, no artifacts). Scars were compared quantitatively in volume and graded qualitatively on the basis of size (area) and location.

RESULTS

Thirty-three patients were scanned using both techniques. In 25 patients, the quality of the 3D PSIR images was acceptable. Scars were detected in 12 patients. Hyperenhanced scar volumes (p = 0.43), qualitative analysis of scar area (p = 0.78), and scar location (p = 0.68) were similar for both techniques. More small hyperenhanced scars, corresponding mostly to nonischemic distribution patterns, were detected using 3D PSIR than 2D PSIR. Although 2D and 3D results were found to be highly correlated for scar volume, Bland-Altman analysis indicated a systematic smaller infarct volume on the 2D PSIR scans (R(2) = 0.84).

CONCLUSION

Free-breathing 3D PSIR turbo FLASH imaging is a promising technique for the assessment of left ventricular scar particularly for scar quantification and the detection of small nonischemic scars in the myocardium.