A quantitative method for estimating individual lung cancer risk

Issues with implementing a high-quality lung cancer screening program

After a comprehensive review of the evidence, the United States Preventive Services Task Force recently endorsed screening with low-dose computed tomography as an early detection approach that has the potential to significantly reduce deaths due to lung cancer. Prudent implementation of lung cancer screening as a high-quality preventive health service is a complex challenge. The clinical evaluation and management of high-risk cohorts in the absence of symptoms mandates an approach that differs significantly from that of symptom-detected lung cancer. As with other cancer screenings, it is essential to provide to informed at-risk individuals a safe, high-quality, cost-effective, and accessible service. In this review, the components of a successful screening program are discussed as we begin to disseminate lung cancer screening as a national resource to improve outcomes with this lethal cancer. This information about lung cancer screening will assist clinicians with communications about the potential benefits and harms of this service for high-risk individuals considering participation in the screening process.

Optimal graph search based segmentation of airway tree double surfaces across bifurcations

Identification of both the luminal and the wall areas of the bronchial tree structure from volumetric X-ray computed tomography (CT) data sets is of critical importance in distinguishing important phenotypes within numerous major lung diseases including chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases (COPD) and asthma. However, accurate assessment of the inner and outer airway wall surfaces of a complete 3-D tree structure is difficult due to their complex nature, particularly around the branch areas. In this paper, we extend a graph search based technique (LOGISMOS) to simultaneously identify multiple inter-related surfaces of branching airway trees. We first perform a presegmentation of the input 3-D image to obtain basic information about the tree topology. The presegmented image is resampled along judiciously determined paths to produce a set of vectors of voxels (called voxel columns). The resampling process utilizes medial axes to ensure that voxel columns of appropriate lengths and directions are used to capture the object surfaces without interference. A geometric graph is constructed whose edges connect voxels in the resampled voxel columns and enforce validity of the smoothness and separation constraints on the sought surfaces. Cost functions with directional information are employed to distinguish inner and outer walls. The assessment of wall thickness measurement on a CT-scanned double-wall physical phantom (patterned after an in vivo imaged human airway tree) achieved highly accurate results on the entire 3-D tree. The observed mean signed error of wall thickness ranged from -0.09 ±0.24 mm to 0.07 ±0.23 mm in bifurcating/nonbifurcating areas. The mean unsigned errors were 0.16±0.12 mm to 0.20±0.11 mm. When the airway wall surface was partitioned into meaningful subregions, the airway wall thickness accuracy was the same in most tested bifurcation/nonbifurcation and carina/noncarina regions (p=NS). Once validated on phantoms, our method was applied to human in vivo volumetric CT data to demonstrate relationships of airway wall thickness as a function of luminal dimension and airway tree generation. Wall thickness differences between the bifurcation/nonbifurcation regions were statistically significant (p < 0.05) for tree generations 6, 7, 8, and 9. In carina/noncarina regions, the wall thickness was statistically different in generations 1, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8.

Quantitative computed tomography analysis, airflow obstruction, and lung cancer in the pittsburgh lung screening study

BACKGROUND

To study the relationship between emphysema, airflow obstruction, and lung cancer in a high-risk population, we performed quantitative analysis of screening computed tomography (CT) scans.

METHODS

Subjects completed questionnaires, spirometry, and low-dose helical chest CT. Analyses compared cases and controls according to automated quantitative analysis of lung parenchyma and airways measures.

RESULTS

Our case-control study of 117 matched pairs of lung cancer cases and controls did not reveal any airway or lung parenchymal findings on quantitative analysis of screening CT scans that were associated with increased lung cancer risk. Airway measures including wall area %, lumen perimeter, lumen area and average wall Hounsfield unit, and parenchymal measures including lung fraction less than -910 Hounsfield units were not statistically different between cases and controls.

CONCLUSIONS

The relationship between visual assessment of emphysema and increased lung cancer risk could not be verified by quantitative analysis of low-dose screening CT scans in a high-risk tobacco exposed population.