ECG-gated Versus Non-ECG-gated High-pitch Dual-source CT for Whole Body CT Angiography (CTA)

An Intra-Individual Comparison of Low-keV Photon-Counting CT versus Energy-Integrating-Detector CT Angiography of the Aorta

This retrospective study aims to provide an intra-individual comparison of aortic CT angiographies (CTAs) using first-generation photon-counting-detector CT (PCD-CT) and third-generation energy-integrating-detector CT (EID-CT). High-pitch CTAs were performed with both scanners and equal contrast-agent protocols. EID-CT employed automatic tube voltage selection (90/100 kVp) with reference tube current of 434/350 mAs, whereas multi-energy PCD-CT scans were generated with fixed tube voltage (120 kVp), image quality level of 64, and reconstructed as 55 keV monoenergetic images. For image quality assessment, contrast-to-noise ratios (CNRs) were calculated, and subjective evaluation (overall quality, luminal contrast, vessel sharpness, blooming, and beam hardening) was performed independently by three radiologists. Fifty-seven patients (12 women, 45 men) were included with a median interval between examinations of 12.7 months (interquartile range 11.1 months). Using manufacturer-recommended scan protocols resulted in a substantially lower radiation dose in PCD-CT (size-specific dose estimate: 4.88 ± 0.48 versus 6.28 ± 0.50 mGy, p < 0.001), while CNR was approximately 50% higher (41.11 ± 8.68 versus 27.05 ± 6.73, p < 0.001). Overall image quality and luminal contrast were deemed superior in PCD-CT (p < 0.001). Notably, EID-CT allowed for comparable vessel sharpness (p = 0.439) and less pronounced blooming and beam hardening (p < 0.001). Inter-rater agreement was good to excellent (0.58-0.87). Concluding, aortic PCD-CTAs facilitate increased image quality with significantly lower radiation dose compared to EID-CTAs.

Risk prediction of preoperative acute ischemic stroke in acute type A aortic dissection

OBJECTIVES

To predict preoperative acute ischemic stroke (AIS) in acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD).

METHODS

In this multi-center retrospective study, 508 consecutive patients diagnosed as ATAAD between April 2020 and March 2021 were considered for inclusion. The patients were divided into a development cohort and two validation cohorts based on time periods and centers. Clinical data and imaging findings obtained were analyzed. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to identify predictors associated with preoperative AIS. The performance of resulting nomogram was evaluated in discrimination and calibration on all cohorts.

RESULTS

A total of 224 patients were in the development cohort, 94 in the temporal validation cohort, and 118 in the geographical validation cohort. Six predictors were identified: age, syncope, D-dimer, moderate to severe aortic valve insufficiency, diameter ratio of true lumen in ascending aorta  < 0.33, and common carotid artery dissection. The nomogram established showed good discrimination (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC], 0.803; 95% CI: 0.742, 0.864) and calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow test p = 0.300) in the development cohort. External validation showed good discrimination and calibration abilities in both temporal (AUC, 0.778; 95% CI: 0.671, 0.885; Hosmer-Lemeshow test p = 0.161) and geographical cohort (AUC, 0.806; 95% CI: 0.717, 0.895; Hosmer-Lemeshow test p = 0.100).

CONCLUSIONS

A nomogram, based on simple imaging and clinical variables collected on admission, showed good discrimination and calibration abilities in predicting preoperative AIS for ATAAD patients.

KEY POINTS

• A nomogram based on simple imaging and clinical findings may predict preoperative acute ischemic stroke in patients with acute type A aortic dissection in emergencies. • The nomogram showed good discrimination and calibration abilities in validation cohorts.

Non-ECG-gated high-pitch CT angiography versus hybrid ECG-gated CT angiography for aorta using 512-slice CT: comparison of image quality and radiation dose

BACKGROUND

There have been few reports comparing image quality and radiation dose of aorta computed tomography angiography (CTA) between the high-pitch and the hybrid technique.

PURPOSE

To compare the image quality and radiation dose among non-electrocardiogram (ECG)-gated high-pitch CTA and hybrid ECG-gated CTA of the aorta using 512-slice CT.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This retrospective study included 110 patients who underwent non-ECG-gated high-pitch CTA (group 1) or hybrid ECG-gated CTA (group 2) of the entire aorta. Interpretability, image noise, contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and the mean effective radiation dose were compared.

RESULTS

The mean image noise of the whole aorta was significantly lower (15.7 ± 1.8 HU vs. 16.5 ± 1.2 HU, P = 0.008) in group 1 than in group 2. The CNR (22.3 ± 4.7 vs. 20.0 ± 3.9, P < 0.001) and SNR (26.5 ± 4.9 vs. 23.2 ± 4.0, P < 0.001) were higher in group 2 compared with group 1. Neither group showed a significant difference in interpretability of the ascending aorta, cardiac chamber, aortic valve, right ostium, and left ostium (all P = 1). The mean effective radiation dose was significantly lower in group 1 than in group 2 (3.5 ± 0.9 mSv vs. 4.3 ± 0.8 mSv, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The non-ECG-gated high-pitch technique shows significantly improved CNR and SNR due to reduced noise with lower radiation exposure. The interpretability of the cardiac structure, ascending aorta, aortic valve, and both ostia did not differ significantly between the two groups.

Dynamic Imaging of Aortic Pathologies: Review of Clinical Applications and Imaging Protocols

The past decade has seen significant advances in dynamic imaging of the aorta. Today's vascular surgeons have the opportunity to choose from a wide array of imaging modalities to evaluate different aortic pathologies. While vascular ultrasound and aortography are considered to be the bread and butter imaging modalities, newer dynamic imaging techniques provide time-resolved information in various aortic pathologies. However, despite growing evidence of their advantages in the literature, they have not been routinely adopted. In order to understand the role of these emerging modalities, one must understand their principles, advantages, and limitations in the context of various clinical scenarios. In this review, we provide an overview of dynamic imaging techniques for aortic pathologies and describe various dynamic computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging protocols, clinical applications, and potential future directions.

High-Pitch Photon-Counting Detector Computed Tomography Angiography of the Aorta: Intraindividual Comparison to Energy-Integrating Detector Computed Tomography at Equal Radiation Dose

PURPOSE

The aims of this study were to determine the objective and subjective image quality of high-pitch computed tomography (CT) angiography of the aorta in clinical dual-source photon-counting detector CT (PCD-CT) and to compare the image quality to conventional dual-source energy-integrating detector CT (EID-CT) in the same patients at equal radiation dose.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with prior CT angiography of the thoracoabdominal aorta acquired on third-generation dual-source EID-CT in the high-pitch mode and with automatic tube voltage selection (ATVS, reference tube voltage 100 kV) were included. Follow-up imaging was performed on a first-generation, clinical dual-source PCD-CT scanner in the high-pitch and multienergy (QuantumPlus) mode at 120 kV using the same contrast media protocol as with EID-CT. Radiation doses between scans were matched by adapting the tube current of PCD-CT. Polychromatic images for both EID-CT and PCD-CT (called T3D) and virtual monoenergetic images at 40, 45, 50, and 55 keV for PCD-CT were reconstructed. Computed tomography attenuation was measured in the aorta; noise was defined as the standard deviation of attenuation; contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) was calculated. Subjective image quality (noise, vessel attenuation, vessel sharpness, and overall quality) was rated by 2 blinded, independent radiologists.

RESULTS

Forty patients were included (mean age, 63 years; 8 women; mean body mass index [BMI], 26 kg/m2). There was no significant difference in BMI, effective diameter, or radiation dose between scans (all P's > 0.05). The ATVS in EID-CT selected 70, 80, 90, 100, 110, and 120 kV in 2, 14, 14, 7, 2, and 1 patients, respectively. Mean CNR was 17 ± 8 for EID-CT and 22 ± 7, 20 ± 6, 18 ± 5, 16 ± 5, and 12 ± 4 for PCD-CT at 40, 45, 50, 55 keV, and T3D, respectively. Contrast-to-noise ratio was significantly higher for 40 and 45 keV of PCD-CT as compared with EID-CT (both P's < 0.05). The linear regression model (adjusted R2, 0.38; P < 0.001) revealed that PCD-CT reconstruction (P < 0.001), BMI group (P = 0.007), and kV of the EID-CT scan (P = 0.01) were significantly associated with CNR difference, with an increase by 34% with PCD-CT for overweight as compared with normal weight patients. Subjective image quality reading revealed slight differences between readers for subjective vessel attenuation and sharpness, whereas subjective noise was rated significantly higher for 40 and 45 keV (P < 0.001) and overall quality similar (P > 0.05) between scans.

CONCLUSIONS

High-pitch PCD-CT angiography of the aorta with VMI at 40 and 45 keV resulted in significantly increased CNR compared with EID-CT with ATVS at matched radiation dose. The CNR gain of PCD-CT increased in overweight patients. Taking into account the subjective analysis, VMI at 45 to 50 keV is proposed as the best trade-off between objective and subjective image quality.

Chest CT Angiography for Acute Aortic Pathologic Conditions: Pearls and Pitfalls

Chest CT angiography (CTA) is essential in the diagnosis of acute aortic syndromes. Chest CTA quality can be optimized with attention to technical parameters pertaining to noncontrast imaging, timing of contrast-enhanced imaging, contrast material volume, kilovolt potential, tube-current modulation, and decisions regarding electrocardiographic-gating and ultra-fast imaging, which may affect the accurate diagnosis of acute aortic syndromes. An understanding of methods to apply to address suboptimal image quality is useful, as the accurate identification of acute aortic syndromes is essential for appropriate patient management. Acute aortic syndromes have high morbidity and mortality, particularly when involving the ascending aorta, and include classic aortic dissection, penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer, and acute intramural hematoma. An understanding of the pathogenesis and distinguishing imaging features of acute aortic syndromes and aortic rupture and some less common manifestations is helpful when interpreting imaging examinations. Related entities, such as ulcerated plaque, ulcerlike projections, and intramural blood pools, and mimics, such as vasculitis and aortic thrombus, are important to recognize; knowledge of these is important to avoid interpretive pitfalls. In addition, an awareness of postsurgical aortic changes can be useful when interpreting CTA examinations when patient history is incomplete. The authors review technical considerations when performing CTA, discuss acute aortic syndromes, and highlight diagnostic challenges encountered when interpreting aortic CTA examinations. ^©RSNA, 2021.

Updates in Vascular Computed Tomography

Computed tomography angiography (CTA) has become a mainstay for the imaging of vascular diseases, because of high accuracy, availability, and rapid turnaround time. High-quality CTA images can now be routinely obtained with high isotropic spatial resolution and temporal resolution. Advances in CTA have focused on improving the image quality, increasing the acquisition speed, eliminating artifacts, and reducing the doses of radiation and iodinated contrast media. Dual-energy computed tomography provides material composition capabilities that can be used for characterizing lesions, optimizing contrast, decreasing artifact, and reducing radiation dose. Deep learning techniques can be used for classification, segmentation, quantification, and image enhancement.

Vascular computed tomography angiography technique and indications

Non-invasive cross-sectional imaging techniques play a crucial role in the assessment of the vascular disease processes. Computed tomography angiography (CTA) is an imaging method of choice for a wide range of vascular diseases that span across different vascular territories. A diagnostic quality CTA requires a robust imaging protocol tailored according to the physiologic state and vascular area of interest. This review article is aimed to provide an overview of the technical considerations and clinical applications of CTA.

Electrocardiography-gated cardiac CT angiography can differentiate brachycephalic dogs with and without pulmonary valve stenosis and findings differ from transthoracic echocardiography

Pulmonary valve stenosis (PS) is one of the most commonly diagnosed congenital heart defects in dogs. Currently, transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) is the standard modality used to evaluate PS. Image acquisition by TTE can be challenging in some brachycephalic breeds of dogs. The use of echocardiographic-gated CT angiography (ECG-gated CTA) in veterinary medicine is limited. This retrospective method comparison study investigated right and left ventricular outflow diameters by sedated ECG-gated CTA and unsedated TTE in 14 brachycephalic dogs with PS and 12 brachycephalic dogs without PS. Measurements of ventricular outflow structures were made in early systole and end diastole for both modalities and then compared for significance between systolic and diastolic phases, as well as between the two modalities. Ratios of the pulmonary trunk diameter to the aorta at different locations (aortic valve, aortic annulus, and ascending aorta) and in different planes (transverse, sagittal) were compared between dogs with PS and without PS, as well as within dogs, by both TTE and ECG-gated CTA. Transthoracic echocardiography and ECG-gated CTA both detected significantly greater pulmonary trunk to aorta ratios in dogs with PS at all aortic locations (P < 0.05). Pulmonary valve to aortic valve ratios were significantly smaller in dogs with PS (P < 0.05). Pulmonary trunk to aorta and pulmonary valve to aorta ratios were achieved with good anatomic detail using ECG-gated CTA. Ratios of the pulmonary trunk and pulmonary valve relative to the aorta may be useful to evaluate for PS using a modality that is underutilized for cardiac assessment.

Image Quality and Radiation Dose of High-Pitch Dual-Source Spiral Cardiothoracic Computed Tomography in Young Children with Congenital Heart Disease: Comparison of Non-Electrocardiography Synchronization and Prospective Electrocardiography Triggering

Objective

To compare image quality and radiation dose of high-pitch dual-source spiral cardiothoracic computed tomography (CT) between non-electrocardiography (ECG)-synchronized and prospectively ECG-triggered data acquisitions in young children with congenital heart disease.

Materials and Methods

Eighty-six children (≤ 3 years) with congenital heart disease who underwent high-pitch dual-source spiral cardiothoracic CT were included in this retrospective study. They were divided into two groups (n = 43 for each; group 1 with non-ECG-synchronization and group 2 with prospective ECG triggering). Patient-related parameters, radiation dose, and image quality were compared between the two groups.

Results

There were no significant differences in patient-related parameters including age, cross-sectional area, body density, and water-equivalent area between the two groups (p > 0.05). Regarding radiation dose parameters, only volume CT dose index values were significantly different between group 1 (1.13 ± 0.09 mGy) and group 2 (1.07 ± 0.12 mGy, p < 0.02). Among image quality parameters, significantly higher image noise (3.8 ± 0.7 Hounsfield units [HU] vs. 3.3 ± 0.6 HU, p < 0.001), significantly lower signal-to-noise ratio (105.0 ± 28.9 vs. 134.1 ± 44.4, p = 0.001) and contrast-to-noise ratio (84.5 ± 27.2 vs. 110.1 ± 43.2, p = 0.002), and significantly less diaphragm motion artifacts (3.8 ± 0.5 vs. 3.7 ± 0.4, p < 0.04) were found in group 1 compared with group 2. Image quality grades of cardiac structures, coronary arteries, ascending aorta, pulmonary trunk, lung markings, and chest wall showed no significant difference between groups (p > 0.05).

Conclusion

In high-pitch dual-source spiral pediatric cardiothoracic CT, additional ECG triggering does not substantially reduce motion artifacts in young children with congenital heart disease.

Application value of iterative reconstruction with CTA to intractable headache patients

Application value of iterative reconstruction with computed tomographic angiography (CTA) in the patients with intractable headache was investigated. One hundred and eighty patients with headache, who were admitted and treated in Cangzhou Central Hospital, were selected to undergo CTA scan. The patients were divided into group A, B and C according to different scanning conditions and data reconstruction techniques. In group A, the scanning parameters were 120 kV and 300 mA, and filtered back projection (FBP) algorithm was used for data reconstruction. In group B, the scan parameters were 100 kV and automatic milliamperes. Further, adaptive iterative dose reduction via three-dimensional processing (AIDR-3D) was used for data reconstruction. In group C, the scan parameters were 80 kV with automatic milliamperes, and AIDR-3D technique was utilized for data reconstruction. The CT value, noise, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), subjective assessment score of image quality and radiation dose of the three groups of images were compared. There were significant differences in CT values, standard deviation (SD) values, SNRs and CNRs of different vessel segments and muscles among the three groups (P<0.05). The image assessment scores at the levels of the atlas and C7 vertebra as well as those of the brain parenchyma in the three groups had notable differences (P<0.05). However, they showed no differences at the level of the C4 vertebra (P>0.05). Further, significant differences were observed in volume computed tomography dose index (CTDI_vol), dose-length product (DLP) and effective dose (ED) (P<0.05). In conclusion, for patients with intractable headache, the image quality of the CTA scan using AIDR-3D reconstruction method showed better results over FBP reconstruction method. Further, best results were observed when the scan parameters were 100 kV, automatic milliamperes and the data reconstruction was performed by AIDR-3D.

Noninvasive aortic imaging

Non-invasive imaging of the aorta has undergone considerable advancements in recent times; largely driven by the technological advances in computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). This review article highlights these recent advancements and discusses the current role of different imaging tools in the management of aortic diseases.

Can multiphase dynamic CT angiography provide a better assessment of aortic dissection compared with the standard triphasic protocol?

Background Acute aortic dissection (AD) is a life-threatening medical emergency. It has been debated whether the multiphase dynamic computed tomography angiography (CTA) protocol is superior to the standard triphasic protocol for revealing the characteristics of AD. Purpose To examine two multiphase dynamic protocols, Dynamic four-dimensional (4D) CTA using the shuttle mode and Flash 4D CTA using the high-pitch mode for the assessment of AD and to compare them with the standard triphasic protocol. Material and Methods A total of 54 consecutive patients were randomly and equally assigned to three groups and scanned with a second-generation DSCT scanner. Groups A, B, and C were assessed with the Dynamic 4D CTA in the shuttle mode, the Flash 4D CTA in the high-pitch mode, and the standard triphasic acquisition protocol, respectively. Image quality of all patients was evaluated. The effective radiation dose (ED) was recorded. Results In 54 patients, CTA images could display the true and false lumens, the intimal flap, the entry tear, and branch vessel involvement in the AD. Compared with group C, additional diagnostic information was obtained in groups A and B, including the dynamic enhancement delay between the true and false lumens (A = 18, B = 18); the presence of membrane oscillation (A = 8, B = 14); dynamic ejection of the contrast material from the true lumen into the false lumen (A = 6, B = 7); and the dynamic obstruction of the left renal artery (B = 2). The ED in these three groups was significantly different ( P < 0.05). Conclusion Compared to the standard triphasic protocol, the multiphase dynamic CTA protocol is feasible and is able to reveal additional diagnostic information. Therefore, we recommend using the high-pitch, dual-source multiphase dynamic CTA to assess ADs.

High-pitch dual-source CT angiography without ECG-gating for imaging the whole aorta: intraindividual comparison with standard pitch single-source technique without ECG gating

PURPOSE

We aimed to perform intraindividual comparison of computed tomography (CT) parameters, image quality, and radiation exposure between standard CT angiography (CTA) and high-pitch dual source (DS)-CTA, in subjects undergoing serial CTA of thoracoabdominal aorta.

METHODS

Eighteen subjects with thoracoabdominal CTA by standard technique and high-pitch DS-CTA technique within 6 months of each other were retrieved for intraindividual comparison of image quality in thoracic and abdominal aorta. Quantitative analysis was performed by comparison of mean aortic attenuation, noise, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR). Qualitative analysis was performed by visual assessment of motion artifacts and diagnostic confidence. Radiation exposure was quantified by effective dose. Image quality was apportioned to radiation exposure by means of figure of merit.

RESULTS

Mean aortic attenuation and noise were higher in high-pitch DS-CTA of thoracoabdominal aorta, whereas SNR and CNR were similar in thoracic aorta and significantly lower in high-pitch DS-CTA of abdominal aorta (P = 0.024 and P = 0.016). High-pitch DS-CTA was significantly better in the first segment of thoracic aorta. Effective dose was reduced by 72% in high-pitch DS-CTA.

CONCLUSION

High-pitch DS-CTA without electrocardiography-gating is an effective technique for imaging aorta with very low radiation exposure and with significant reduction of motion artifacts in ascending aorta; however, the overall quality of high-pitch DS-CTA in abdominal aorta is lower than standard CTA.