Dynamic Imaging of Aortic Pathologies: Review of Clinical Applications and Imaging Protocols

The past decade has seen significant advances in dynamic imaging of the aorta. Today's vascular surgeons have the opportunity to choose from a wide array of imaging modalities to evaluate different aortic pathologies. While vascular ultrasound and aortography are considered to be the bread and butter imaging modalities, newer dynamic imaging techniques provide time-resolved information in various aortic pathologies. However, despite growing evidence of their advantages in the literature, they have not been routinely adopted. In order to understand the role of these emerging modalities, one must understand their principles, advantages, and limitations in the context of various clinical scenarios. In this review, we provide an overview of dynamic imaging techniques for aortic pathologies and describe various dynamic computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging protocols, clinical applications, and potential future directions.

A novel sequence for simultaneous measurement of whole-brain static and dynamic MRA, intracranial vessel wall image, and T1 -weighted structural brain MRI

PURPOSE

To propose a highly time-efficient imaging technique named improved simultaneous noncontrast angiography and intraplaque hemorrhage (iSNAP) for simultaneous assessment of lumen, vessel wall, and blood flow in intracranial arteries.

METHODS

iSNAP consists of pulsed arterial spin labeling preparations and 3D golden angle radial acquisition. Images were reconstructed by k-space weighted image contrast (KWIC) method with optimized data-sharing strategies. Dynamic MRA for blood flow assessment was obtained from iSNAP by reconstruction at multiple inversion times and image subtraction, static MRA by both image subtraction approach and phase-sensitive inversion recovery technique, and vessel wall images by both reconstruction at zero-crossing time-point of blood and phase-sensitive inversion recovery. A T₁ -weighted brain MRI was also reconstructed from iSNAP. Preliminary comparison of iSNAP against the dedicated dynamic MRA sequence 4D-TRANCE, MRA/vessel wall imaging sequence SNAP, and vessel wall imaging sequence T₁ -weighted VISTA was performed in healthy volunteers and patients.

RESULTS

iSNAP has whole-brain coverage and takes ~6.5 min. The dedicated reconstruction strategies are feasible for each iSNAP image contrast and beneficial for image SNR. iSNAP-dynamic MRA yields similar dynamic flow information as 4D-TRANCE and allows more flexible temporal resolution. The 2 types of iSNAP static MRA images complement each other in characterizing both proximal large arteries and distal small arteries. Depiction of vessel wall lesions in iSNAP vessel wall images is better than SNAP and may be similar to T₁ -weighted VISTA, although the images are slightly blurred.

CONCLUSION

iSNAP provides a time-efficient evaluation of intracranial arteries and may have great potential for comprehensive assessment of intracranial vascular conditions using a single sequence.

Noncontrast enhanced four-dimensional dynamic MRA with golden angle radial acquisition and K-space weighted image contrast (KWIC) reconstruction

PURPOSE

To explore the feasibility of 2D and 3D golden-angle radial acquisition strategies in conjunction with k-space weighted image contrast (KWIC) temporal filtering to achieve noncontrast enhanced dynamic MRA (dMRA) with high spatial resolution, low streaking artifacts and high temporal fidelity.

METHODS

Simulations and in vivo examinations in eight normal volunteers and an arteriovenous malformation patient were carried out. Both 2D and 3D golden angle radial sequences, preceded by spin tagging, were used for dMRA of the brain. The radial dMRA data were temporally filtered using the KWIC strategy and compared with matched standard Cartesian techniques.

RESULTS

The 2D and 3D dynamic MRA image series acquired with the proposed radial techniques demonstrated excellent image quality without discernible temporal blurring compared with standard Cartesian based approaches. The image quality of radial dMRA was equivalent to or higher than that of Cartesian dMRA by visual inspection. A reduction factor of up to 10 and 3 in scan time was achieved for 2D and 3D radial dMRA compared with the Cartesian-based counterparts.

CONCLUSION

The proposed 2D and 3D radial dMRA techniques demonstrated image quality comparable or even superior to those obtained with standard Cartesian methods, but within a fraction of the scan time.