Yield of Preoperative Whole-body CT in Patients Presenting with Single Brain Malignancy:: Experience at a Tertiary-care Center

When is a staging scan required for newly diagnosed brain lesions on CT? A multivariate logistic regression analysis

PURPOSE

For patients with a new lesion on CT head (CTH) suspected to be a brain tumor, a staging chest, abdomen, and pelvis CT (CTCAP) is only warranted if a metastatic lesion is suspected. Unnecessary CTCAPs are often performed too early in a patient's journey due to poor patient selection. We sought to create a protocol to guide the selection of patients for CTCAPs based on their CTH findings.

METHODS

Patients with suspected new brain tumors discussed at the neuro-oncology MDT at a tertiary neurosurgical center were reviewed. Patient demographics and CTH features were collected. For protocol creation, data was collected from July to December 2020, and predictor variables were identified using multivariate logistic regression. Candidate protocols were assessed in a protocol testing stage using similar data collected from January to June 2021. Sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) were computed for each protocol.

RESULTS

Variables from the protocol creation stage (222 patients) were assessed in the protocol testing stage (216 patients). The most sensitive variables predicting metastatic disease were a previous history of cancer, multiple lesions, lesion < 4 cm, and infratentorial location. A protocol recommending a CTCAP based on the presence of one of these features has a sensitivity of 99.1% (AUC 0.704).

CONCLUSIONS

Unnecessary CTCAPs are reduced if performed only if a patient has one of the four identified predictor variables.

Diagnostic Value of CT of Chest, Abdomen, and Pelvis in Patients With Solitary and Multiple Brain Lesions

OBJECTIVE. A common goal in patients with newly discovered brain lesions is to determine if the lesions are primary malignant brain neoplasms, metastases, or benign entities. Such patients often undergo CT of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis (CT CAP) to identify a primary neoplasm that may have metastasized to the brain. The aim of this study is to determine the frequency of finding a primary cancer on CT CAP. MATERIALS AND METHODS. A large academic hospital imaging database was searched for cases of new intracranial lesions with subsequent CT CAP performed for metastatic workup. The frequency of primary neoplasms diagnosed in the chest versus abdominal and pelvic portions of CT scans was determined in patients with newly identified intraaxial and extraaxial brain lesions. Lesion characteristics were recorded including size, number, and the presence of enhancement and hemorrhage. Ancillary signs of an abdominopelvic neoplasm were also recorded. RESULTS. A total of 227 of 287 (79%) cases of newly discovered intracranial lesions were malignant (primary or metastatic) and 60 (21%) were benign. Of the 227 malignant cases, 136 (60%) were primary brain neoplasms and 91 (40%) were brain metastases, and 68 of the 91 (75%) lung primary. Chest CT (CTC) identified a primary neoplasm in 65 of 287 (23%) cases; 63 of those 65 (96%) neoplasms arose in the lungs. CT of the abdomen and pelvis (CTAP) identified a primary neoplasm in only 3 of 287 (1%) cases. In 26 cases in which the intracranial lesions did not enhance, only one was metastatic. CONCLUSION. In patients with newly discovered brain lesions, CTC is warranted, but CTAP is unlikely to be useful in patients without ancillary signs of abdominopelvic neoplasm.

The Utility of Whole Body Imaging in the Evaluation of Solitary Brain Tumors

BACKGROUND

Solitary brain tumors can propose a diagnostic dilemma owing to the difficulty in differentiating between primary brain tumors and metastatic disease. The similar radiologic appearance on routine magnetic resonance imaging will necessitate the need for additional noninvasive testing. We sought to determine the clinical utility of preoperative whole body screening with computed tomography (CT) to detect metastatic disease in patients with solitary brain tumors.

METHODS

A prospectively maintained surgical database for a large quaternary care academic institution was retrospectively reviewed for all patients undergoing craniotomy for a new diagnosis of enhancing solitary brain lesion from January 2011 to January 2016. Patients were excluded if the imaging findings had demonstrated multiple brain tumors, they had a known diagnosis of malignancy, or they had undergone previous craniotomy. The demographic and radiographic information and clinical and histopathologic data were collected and tallied.

RESULTS

A total of 218 patients with solitary brain tumors met the inclusion criteria and were included in the present study. Histopathologic analysis confirmed primary central nervous system tumors in 152 patients (74.4%) and metastatic disease in 66 (25.6%). Preoperative screening with whole body CT had a sensitivity of 0.92 and specificity of 0.95 for detecting systemic metastases in the patients. Preoperative whole body CT correctly identified systemic malignancy in 88% of the patients ultimately diagnosed with metastasis (positive predictive value, 88%). Of those with negative whole body imaging findings, 97% had a diagnosis of a primary central nervous system neoplasm (negative predictive value, 97%).

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative whole body CT had a positive predictive value of 88% and negative predictive value of 97% in the present study and was both sensitive (92%) and specific (95%) for the detection of extracranial tumors. The identification of extracranial tumors on whole body CT screening might alter management.